When Does the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient Hold? Scale- and Mechanism-Based Conditions

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The scale dependence of the latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG) has been widely acknowledged, yet its boundaries of applicability remain unclear. Here, we develop a multi-scale analytical framework to assess the environmental determinants of species richness across major taxonomic groups (plants, birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and total species), integrating climatic and topographic predictors with simulated richness data. Our results show that the latitudinal diversity gradient exhibits significant scale dependence, and that the ecological relationships at the overall and local levels display a statistical pattern similar to Simpson’s paradox. This divergence arises from the latitudinal turnover of dominant environmental drivers, coupled with their spatial continuity across transition zones. These findings indicate that the validity of the LDG is shaped by two key dimensions of environmental filtering, namely the spatial differentiation and transmission of dominant drivers, which together determine the applicability boundaries of environmental drivers.
Full text 2,046 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The scale dependence of the latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG) has been widely acknowledged, yet its boundaries of applicability remain unclear. Here, we develop a multi-scale analytical framework to assess the environmental determinants of species richness across major taxonomic groups (plants, birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and total species), integrating climatic and topographic predictors with simulated richness data. Our results show that the latitudinal diversity gradient exhibits significant scale dependence, and that the ecological relationships at the overall and local levels display a statistical pattern similar to Simpson’s paradox. This divergence arises from the latitudinal turnover of dominant environmental drivers, coupled with their spatial continuity across transition zones. These findings indicate that the validity of the LDG is shaped by two key dimensions of environmental filtering, namely the spatial differentiation and transmission of dominant drivers, which together determine the applicability boundaries of environmental drivers. Information & Authors Information Version history Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.

Keywords

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 203views 88downloads Citations Download citation Yange Wang, Zhou Fang, Zhongde Huang, et al. When Does the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient Hold? Scale- and Mechanism-Based Conditions. Authorea. 24 July 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175336621.10374354/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175336621.10374354/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00