Providing Safety in a Rush: How Did Shadow Banks Respond to a $1 Trillion Shock
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
This paper examines the challenges faced by government money market funds (MMFs) in maintaining their safety during flight-to-liquidity events. Using exogenous variation in both demand for government MMF shares and the supply of Treasury bills, we show that Treasury securities are insufficient to accommodate MMFs' needs in a flight to liquidity. Instead, MMFs rely on the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs). FHLBs not only offer large amounts of safe assets on short notice, but also securities with features not offered by Treasury securities or repo that allow MMFs to manage liquidity and interest rate risks.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00