Timing of Umbilical Cord Clamping – Attitudes and Beliefs among Midwives, Obstetricians, and Neonatologists
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Abstract Objective To assess the attitudes and beliefs about cord clamping management among health professionals involved in neonatal resuscitation. Study design: A cross-sectional survey was administered electronically, using an adaptation of the questionnaire developed by Jelin et al. The survey was conducted among midwives, nursing staff, obstetricians, and pediatricians/neonatologists from September 2022 to August 2023. Results were analyzed descriptively. Result Of 838 respondents analyzed, 94% reported cord clamping timing being “very or moderately important” for neonatal outcomes. Midwives were more likely to use an event-based approach to cord clamping compared to physicians. Among midwives and pediatric physicians, 27% and 10% respectively preferred an event-based approach to cord clamping in resuscitation situations. Obstetricians predominantly selected < 30 s as the preferred timing for cord clamping in resuscitation scenarios. Conclusion Timing of cord clamping is considered important among respondents. Midwives and physicians differ in their approach to cord clamping.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-14T06:25:32.811723+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0