The laparoscopic appearance of Schistosomiasis may be mistaken for “non-pigmented” endometriosis

Kevin D Jones, Kevin Jones, Emeka O Okaro, E. Okaro, Chris Sutton, Christopher Sutton
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2003 · vol. 106(2) , pp. 227–229 · doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00220-8 · PMID:12551799 · W1981961575
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This paper describes how the laparoscopic appearance of schistosomiasis can be misdiagnosed as non-pigmented endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Schistosomiasis Adult Diagnosis, Differential Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Laparoscopy Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Schistosomiasis Schistosomiasis Schistosomiasis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

Cited by (1)

References (10)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:12:55.732728+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK