In vitro evolution of caspofungin resistance in Candidozyma auris via FKS1 hotspot I mutations results in moderate fitness trade-offs but no reduction in virulence

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,833 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Resistance to echinocandins in the recently emerged pathogen Candidozyma auris (previously known as Candida auris) poses significant clinical challenges. This study reports the in vitro evolution of a caspofungin-sensitive C. auris clade II isolate to acquire caspofungin resistance. We sequenced the whole genome of the parental strain and its drug-resistant progeny. The resistant isolates harboured mutations in the FKS1 gene altering a conserved residue (S639) also mutated in caspofungin-resistant clinical isolates; demonstrating that FKS1-S639 mutations are sufficient to confer resistance to caspofungin. Using these resistant strains, we examined cross-resistance & collateral sensitivity to other antifungal drugs and to cell wall stress, cell wall ultrastructure, biofilm formation, and virulence. As expected, both FKS1-S639P and FKS1-S639Y variants exhibited resistance not only to caspofungin but also to other echinocandins. Interestingly, these resistant strains showed moderate collateral sensitivity to certain azole antifungals and increased susceptibility to cell wall stress. While cell wall chitin content was slightly elevated in resistant isolates compared to sensitive ones, overall cell wall structure and phosphomannan levels remained unchanged. Biofilm formation capabilities were similar across all strains, and virulence in invertebrate models was unaffected by the FKS1 mutations. These findings indicate that while the evolution of caspofungin resistance through FKS1 mutations does incur fitness trade-offs, it does not substantially compromise the pathogenic potential of C. auris. This underscores the complexities of evolution of antifungal resistance mechanisms in this pathogen and the impact on its biology. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0