Machine learning classification of fibromyalgia from blood transcriptomes: confounder benchmarking and implications for endometriosis-associated pain

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-31 ⓘ

Reanalysis of fibromyalgia transcriptomes reveals that machine learning performance is largely explained by sex and cell composition rather than disease-specific signals, suggesting future biomarker studies for endometriosis-associated pain must benchmark against these confounds.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-28 · read from full text ⓘ

This study reanalyzed a large public cohort of fibromyalgia patients to evaluate whether blood transcriptomic signatures can effectively distinguish them from healthy controls using machine learning. While gene expression models achieved high classification accuracy, the performance was nearly matched by simple baselines based solely on sex or peripheral blood mononuclear cell composition. The authors note that confounding factors such as gynecological comorbidities and hormonal status were absent from the metadata and remain untested contributors to the observed signals. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically, it is cited in the context of related nociplastic pain conditions where future biomarker studies should account for demographic and cellular confounds.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Fibromyalgia (FM) lacks an objective biomarker, and blood transcriptomic signatures have been proposed to fill this gap. Here, the largest public peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) RNA-seq cohort of FM reporting expression subtypes (96 patients, 93 controls) was reanalysed using leakage-free nested cross-validation, with feature selection and scaling confined strictly to training folds. Gene expression discriminated patients from controls (ROC-AUC 0.821 for logistic regression and 0.825 for XGBoost), clearing a 100-repetition permutation-label null (p= 0.0099). Two simple, disease-agnostic baselines, however, reach nearly the same performance: sex alone reaches AUC 0.727, and a four-score PBMC cell-composition proxy reaches AUC 0.71-0.76. Restricting to females alone gives AUC 0.783 (0.705-0.858), and excluding X/Y-linked genes does not reduce performance, so the signal is not purely a sex-composition artifact; but the female-only expression model does not significantly exceed the composition-only proxy in the same females (0.783 vs. 0.712, paired 95% CI -0.025 to 0.175), so a composition contribution cannot be excluded. Preranked gene set enrichment analysis finds curated CLEAR/lysosomal and interferon/JAK-STAT gene sets, proxies for two subtype signatures of the original study, enriched among genes expressed lower in FM, also in females alone, but this enrichment disappears after adjusting for the composition proxies. Gynecological comorbidity, hormonal status, and medication are absent from the public metadata and remain plausible, untested contributors to the female-only estimate. These findings are hypothesis-generating, not a basis for clinical diagnosis: a single-cohort, correlational result consistent with, but not sufficient to establish, an FM-specific signal distinct from demographic, hormonal, and cell-composition confounds, pending independent replication. Future blood-based biomarker studies for FM, and for related nociplastic pain conditions such as endometriosis, should report performance relative to sex- and composition-based baselines as standard practice.
Full text 2,203 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Fibromyalgia (FM) lacks an objective biomarker, and blood transcriptomic signatures have been proposed to fill this gap. Here, the largest public peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) RNA-seq cohort of FM reporting expression subtypes (96 patients, 93 controls) was reanalysed using leakage-free nested cross-validation, with feature selection and scaling confined strictly to training folds. Gene expression discriminated patients from controls (ROC-AUC 0.821 for logistic regression and 0.825 for XGBoost), clearing a 100-repetition permutation-label null (p= 0.0099). Two simple, disease-agnostic baselines, however, reach nearly the same performance: sex alone reaches AUC 0.727, and a four-score PBMC cell-composition proxy reaches AUC 0.71-0.76. Restricting to females alone gives AUC 0.783 (0.705-0.858), and excluding X/Y-linked genes does not reduce performance, so the signal is not purely a sex-composition artifact; but the female-only expression model does not significantly exceed the composition-only proxy in the same females (0.783 vs. 0.712, paired 95% CI -0.025 to 0.175), so a composition contribution cannot be excluded. Preranked gene set enrichment analysis finds curated CLEAR/lysosomal and interferon/JAK-STAT gene sets, proxies for two subtype signatures of the original study, enriched among genes expressed lower in FM, also in females alone, but this enrichment disappears after adjusting for the composition proxies. Gynecological comorbidity, hormonal status, and medication are absent from the public metadata and remain plausible, untested contributors to the female-only estimate. These findings are hypothesis-generating, not a basis for clinical diagnosis: a single-cohort, correlational result consistent with, but not sufficient to establish, an FM-specific signal distinct from demographic, hormonal, and cell-composition confounds, pending independent replication. Future blood-based biomarker studies for FM, and for related nociplastic pain conditions such as endometriosis, should report performance relative to sex- and composition-based baselines as standard practice. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-11-07T06:36:24.232959+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-29T06:31:18.914191+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0