Full text
1,967 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) govern life processes. And exploring GRNs is of great value for understanding biological functions and developing species resources. At present, studies on plant GRNs are limited, mostly focusing on the tissue level, which hinders the discovery of cell type-specific regulatory networks and mechanisms. To address this, we have proposed a GRN research framework named ctsGRN (CellTypeSpecGRN) for conducting cell-specific GRN research at the cell type resolution. In this framework, we employed three representative algorithms from statistics (e.g., correlation analysis), traditional machine learning (e.g., random forest) and deep learning (e.g., neural networks) to construct GRNs for different cell types in Arabidopsis roots. Among these, traditional machine learning methods showed the best performance. Experimental validation through yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assays and ChIP-seq data confirmed the high reliability and predictive power of these inferred GRNs. By analyzing these networks, we mined novel cell type-specific regulatory relationships, identified core transcription factor (TF) AT5G08790 involved in root development, discovered 249 cell-type-specific hub TFs, and 136 key functional modules were found to be enriched in biological processes. Additionally, we revealed significant heterogeneity of TF-target gene interactions across various cell types. This comprehensive analysis offers a detailed overview of TF-mediated cell type-specific transcriptional regulation in Arabidopsis roots, providing new insights into the molecular mechanisms of root development and establishing a guideline framework for GRN research at the cell-type level in plants.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
Email addresses: YJ: jiangyu{at}stu.dali.edu.cn, HY: yhl{at}stu.dali.edu.cn, JG: GaoJian{at}stu.dali.edu.cn, QZ: zhangqi{at}stu.dali.edu.cn, ZY: 1026196319{at}qq.com
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.