Temporal Trends in Tolvaptan Use After Revision of National Heart Failure Guidelines in Japan | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Temporal Trends in Tolvaptan Use After Revision of National Heart Failure Guidelines in Japan Yusuke Yamazaki, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Shun Kohsaka, Yuji Nagatomo, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-689564/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 8 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Within no definite diuretic protocol for acute heart failure (AHF) patients and its variation in regional clinical guidelines, the latest national guidelines in Japan commends use of tolvaptan in diuretic-resistant patients. This study aimed to examine trends in tolvaptan usage and associated outcomes of AHF patients requiring hospitalization. Between April, 2018 and October, 2019, 1343 consecutive AHF patients (median 78 [69–85] y/o) were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter registry in Japan. Trends over time in tolvaptan usage, along with the severity of heart failure status based on the Get With The Guideline-Heart Failure [GWTG-HF] risk score, and in-hospital outcomes were investigated. During the study period, tolvaptan usage has increased from 13.0% to 28.7% over time ( p for trend=0.07), and 49.4% started tolvaptan within 3 days after admission. The GWTG-HF risk score in the tolvaptan group has significantly decreased over time, while that in the non-tolvaptan group has unchanged. There were no differences in the in-hospital mortality rate between the patients with and without tolvaptan (6.7% vs. 5.8%). After revision of the Japanese clinical practice guidelines for AHF in March 2018, tolvaptan usage for AHF patients has steadily increased. However, in-hospital outcomes including mortality do not seem to be affected. Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems acute heart failure tolvaptan mortality natriuretic peptide renal impairment Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Introduction Clinical congestion is the primary pathophysiology that leads to impaired exercise capacity and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Diuretics continue to play an essential role in the treatment to relieve congestive signs and symptoms. Meanwhile, natriuretic agents (i.e. loop and /or thiazide-type diuretics) are also known to have a negative impact on clinical outcomes in patients with HF [ 1 , 2 ]. In this context, clinical practice guidelines generally recommend use of natriuretic agents to achieve and maintain euvolemia with the lowest achievable dose [ 3 , 4 ]. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin-2 receptor antagonist, leads to aquaresis without natriuresis-related electrolyte disturbances and is widely implemented in the modern HF management in Japan [ 5 ]. Originally, the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) and Japanese Heart Failure Society (JHFS) 2017 guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure commend use of tolvaptan with low dose (7.5–15 mg/day) for the treatment of fluid retention in patients not responding well to other diuretics including loop diuretics (Class IIa, Level of Evidence A) [ 6 ]. Favorable results on the surrogate outcomes (e.g. 48-hour urine volume) were demonstrated in the domestic trials with the usage of low-dose tolvaptan in Japan [ 7 , 8 ], albeit more large-scale trials that were performed in Western countries failed to show the effect of a high-dose tolvaptan (30 mg/day) on improving the prognosis as well as HF symptoms in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) [ 9 – 11 ]. These recommendations may have led to use of tolvaptan in a broader range of AHF patients. Herein, we aimed to examine the usage of tolvaptan by their risk profile in the Japanese inpatient-based multicenter registry of AHF patients. We also assessed an association of tolvaptan usage with in-hospital outcomes after revision of the JCS/JHFS clinical practice guidelines. Results Patient characteristics The mean age of the patients was 78 (IQR 69–85) years, and 62% were men with a systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and left ventricular ejection fraction of 135 (IQR 116–160) mm Hg, 92 (IQR 74–112) beat per minute, and 45% (IQR 31–57%), respectively. Overall, 267 (19.9%) patients received oral tolvaptan during their index hospitalization. A half (n = 132) of the tolvaptan group (an approved dose of tolvaptan 7.5–15 mg/day in Japan) started an add-on tolvaptan to loop diuretics within 3 days after admission (Fig. 1 ). Baseline characteristics of the AHF patients at the time of admission were compared by dividing into two groups based on use of tolvaptan during their hospitalization (Table 1 ). Compared with the non-tolvaptan group, the tolvaptan group had a higher serum creatinine level (1.21 [IQR 0.88–1.72] mg/dL vs.1.07 [IQR 0.82–1.46] mg/dL; p < 0.001) and a lower hemoglobin level (11.6 [IQR 9.8–13.2] g/dL vs. 12.3 [IQR 10.6–13.8] g/dL; p < 0.001). As for medication before admission, the tolvaptan group tended to frequently use loop diuretics (61% vs. 44%; p < 0.001) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (27% vs. 17%; p < 0.001). Also, the patient characteristics at the time of discharge by the tolvaptan and non-tolvaptan groups were presented in Table S1 in the Online Supplement. Table 1 Baseline characteristics Tolvaptan (-) n = 1,076 Tolvaptan (+) n = 267 P value Age, years 79 (68–86) 79 (71–85) 0.38 Men, n (%) 678 (64) 161 (60) 0.41 Body mass index, kg/m 2 22.7 (20.2–26.1) 23.4 (20.5–26.0) 0.27 Systolic BP, mm Hg 136 (117–161) 134 (115–157) 0.17 Heart rate, bpm 94 (75–114) 87 (73–105) 0.11 Left ventricular ejection fraction, % 44 (32–57) 45 (31–58) 0.59 GWTG-HF risk score 41 (35–47) 42 (36–48) 0.05 Etiology, n (%) 0.03 DCM 152 (14) 22 (8) ICM 256 (24) 66 (25) Valvular 233 (22) 73 (27) Others 435 (40) 106 (40) Comorbidities, n (%) History of HF hospitalization 381 (35) 102 (38) 0.40 Coronary artery disease 288 (27) 80 (30) 0.35 Atrial fibrillation 449 (41) 118 (45) 0.47 Hypertension 651 (62) 166 (64) 0.84 Diabetes mellitus 334 (31) 89 (34) 0.47 Dyslipidemia 352 (33) 103 (39) 0.07 Stroke 128 (12) 41 (14) 0.13 COPD 56 (5) 9 (3) 0.27 Dementia 103 (10) 13 (5) 0.02 Laboratory findings Hemoglobin, g/dl 12.3 (10.6–13.8) 11.6 (9.8–13.2) < 0.001 Creatinine, mg/dl 1.07 (0.82–1.46) 1.21 (0.88–1.72) < 0.001 BUN, mg/dl 22.8 (17.0–34.4) 26.3 (18.6–41.1) < 0.001 Sodium, mEq/l 140.0 (138.0–142.0) 139.0 (136.0–141.0) < 0.001 Albumin, mg/dl 3.5 (3.2–3.8) 3.5 (3.2–3.9) 0.71 BNP, pg/ml * 763 (444–1322) 822 (499–1414) 0.15 NT-proBNP, pg/ml * 4235 (2457–7860) 4846 (2380–9678) 0.16 Medication before admission, n (%) ACEI or ARB 402 (38) 105 (43) 0.55 Beta blocker 467 (42) 132 (49) 0.08 MRA 185 (17) 73 (27) < 0.001 Digoxin 33 (3) 10 (4) 0.56 Loop diuretics 479 (44) 162 (61) < 0.001 Furosemide equivalent, mg $ 0 (0–20) 20 (0–40) 0.29 Thiazide-type diuretics 37 (4) 12 (4) 0.47 In-hospital treatment, n (%) Loop diuretics, iv 871 (81) 225 (84) 0.21 Vasodilators, iv 359 (33) 93 (35) 0.65 Inotropes, iv 118 (11) 35 (13) 0.32 Non-invasive ventilation 386 (36) 126 (47) < 0.001 Intubation 34 (3) 11 (4) 0.45 IABP 19 (2) 6 (2) 0.61 VA-ECMO / VAD 9 (< 1) 1 (< 1) 0.70 BP, blood pressure; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; ICM, ischemic cardiomyopathy; HF, heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; ACEI; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB; angiotensin receptor blocker; MRA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; IABP, intraaortic balloon pumping; VA-ECMO, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; VAD, ventricular assist device. * In the 959 patients, BNP levels were measured, in contrast, NT-proBNP levels were measured in 384 patients. $ Furosemide 20 mg = Azosemide 30 mg = Torsemide 4 mg Time trend of tolvaptan usage and GWTG-HF risk score During the study period after revision of the JCS/JHFS clinical practice guidelines on March 2018, the tolvaptan usage steadily increased from 13.0–28.7% over time, but with no statistical significance ( p for trend = 0.07) (Fig. 2 ). Notably, the average GWTG-HF risk score in the tolvaptan group has significantly decreased from 47 to 41 over the study period ( p for trend = 0.015), while the score in the non-tolvaptan group remained unchanged (Fig. 3 ). Tolvaptan usage and in-hospital outcomes Regardless of tolvaptan usage, no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality rate was observed (6.7% in the tolvaptan group vs. 5.8% in the non-tolvaptan group, p = 0.56), even after adjusted for the GWTG-HF risk score. Meanwhile, the tolvaptan group had a longer LOHS compared with the non-tolvaptan group (23 [IQR 14–33] days vs. 16 [IQR 9–24] days; p < 0.001). Table 2 shows the change in clinical and laboratory data of the patients who were successfully discharged. In the tolvaptan group, body weight significantly decreased by 5.4 kg [IQR 3.0–8.5] compared with that in the non-tolvaptan group (4.4 kg [IQR 2.2–7.3]; p = 0.004). Meanwhile, the improvement rate of NP levels from admission to discharge in the tolvaptan group was significantly lower than that in the non-tolvaptan group: 56.9% [IQR 25.3–74.9] in the tolvaptan group vs. 62.3% [IQR 38.2–80.4] in the non-tolvaptan group (p = 0.006). Even in the multivariable linear regression model adjusting for the GWTG-HF risk score, tolvaptan usage remained to be associated with a lower improvement rate of NP levels (p = 0.006). In addition, there was no difference in a change in serum creatinine levels from admission to discharge between the two groups (0.05 mg/dL [95% confidence interval, -0.04–0.15] in the tolvaptan group vs. -0.02 mg/dL [95% confidence interval, -0.07–0.03] in the non-tolvaptan group, p = 0.16 for ANCOVA). Table 2 Changes in clinical variables during the index hospitalization Tolvaptan (-) n = 1,014 Tolvaptan (+) n = 249 P value Body weight (kg) -4.4 (-7.3 – -2.2) -5.4 (-8.5 – -3.0) 0.004 Systolic BP, mm Hg -25 (-47 – -7.0) -25 (-45 – -6) 0.58 Heart rate, bpm -20 (-42 – -3.0) -13 (-30–0) < 0.001 Hemoglobin, g/dl 0 (-0.9–0.9) -0.1 (-1.2–1.0) 0.16 Creatinine, mg/dl -0.02 (-0.07–0.03) 0.05 (-0.04–0.15) 0.16 BUN, mg/dl 0.40 (-6.1–6.3) 2.0 (-5.0–9.9) 0.005 Sodium, mEq/l -1.0 (-3.0–1.7) 0 (-3.0–3.0) 0.035 Albumin, mg/dl -0.10 (-0.40–0.20) -0.10 (-0.50–0.20) 0.16 Natriuretic peptides, %* 56.9 (25.3–74.9) 62.3 (38.3–80.4) 0.006 * The change in natriuretic peptide (NP) levels, including either B-type natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, was defined as ([NP values at admission – NP values at discharge] / NP values at admission). When dividing the patients receiving tolvaptan into 2 groups by the median time of initiation of tolvaptan, the early tolvaptan group that started tolvaptan within 3 days from hospitalization, compared with the late tolvaptan group (4 or more days after hospitalization), showed almost similar baseline characteristics, other than serum creatinine levels: 1.39 [IQR 0.96–1.93] mg/dl in the early group vs. 1.03 [IQR 0.83–1.62] mg/dl in the late group (p < 0.001) ( Table S2 in the Online Supplement). No statistical difference in the GWTG-HF risk score was observed between the early and late tolvaptan groups. The early group has a shorter LOHS than the late group (20 [IQR 12–30] days vs. 28 [IQR 19–43] days; p < 0.001), while no difference in the in-hospital mortality rate was observed between the two groups (6.8% in the early group vs. 6.6% in the late group; p = 0.58). Discussion Using this prospective multicenter registry, we demonstrated the following findings: 1) tolvaptan tends to be significantly used in patients with renal impairment as well as those who had loop diuretics and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists at baseline; 2) during the study period, tolvaptan usage has increased from 13.0–28.7% over time, but with no statistical significance; 3) in the tolvaptan group, the average GWTG-HF risk score has significantly decreased albeit that in the non-tolvaptan group has unchanged over the study period; and 4) irrespective of tolvaptan usage, there were no between-differences in the in-hospital mortality rate. Within the international clinical practice guidelines and expert's statements of the treatment for AHF patients, up-titration of intravenous loop diuretics is emphasized preferentially, while use of other diuretics in combination is commended after administration of a substantial dose of loop diuretics to reach the ceiling dose [ 3 , 4 ]. The JCS/JHFS 2017 guidelines also state a directionally similar approach to diuretic-resistant cases [ 6 ]. In this context, the nationwide claim-based database in Japan (n = 235,487) reported that tolvaptan usage for AHF patients increased steadily from 3.2% in 2011 to 39.0% in 2018 and the timing of tolvaptan usage became gradually early, and consequently tolvaptan was used within 2 days after admission among more than half of patients who received tolvaptan [ 5 ], which is comparable with our data. On another front, our data as with other observational studies showed that the baseline diuretic dose (20–40 mg furosemide equivalent) in Japanese patients was historically lower than that in Western patients [ 12 , 13 ]. Intravenous administration of loop diuretics for AHF patients is also quantitatively low in Japanese clinical practice: A multicenter observational study described that the median dose of intravenous furosemide was 60 mg (IQR 20–100 mg) within 48 hours of admission in AHF patients [ 14 ]. Despite a lack of clear reasons on low-dose diuretics in Japan, it may be explained by differences in pharmacokinetics and/or body mass index between ethnicities. Although we have no data on the dose of intravenous furosemide and are unable to examine an association of up-titration of loop diuretics and add-on tolvaptan with patient outcomes, results from our study and the previous study [ 5 ] seem to show that physicians in Japan preferentially implement the initial sequential nephron blockade strategy with tolvaptan relative to up-titration of loop diuretics in clinical practice. In the United States, however, one fifth to one third of inpatients with HF had in-hospital treatment escalated beyond initial intravenous diuretic therapy (i.e., up-titration of intravenous diuretics) [ 15 ] while 30–40% of AHF patients in Japan added tolvaptan into intravenous furosemide, reflecting a possibility that the initial dose of loop diuretics for AHF patients may not be sufficient in Japan. Future research is warranted to revalidate the position of 2nd -line diuretics, such as tolvaptan and thiazide-type diuretics, in the treatment for HF and identify patients who can benefit from tolvaptan, given that no clear recommendation with robust clinical evidence to the best diuretic regimen for diuretic-resistant cases. This study also found no association of tolvaptan usage with in-hospital mortality, regardless of the timing of its administration, as with the results from prior clinical trials [ 7 , 9 – 11 ]. On the contrary, the tolvaptan group had a longer LOHS with a greater body weight reduction and lower improvement rate of NP levels during hospitalization. This can be in part explained by more patients at advanced stages of HF in the tolvaptan group, reflecting renal impairment, anemia, and higher GWTG-HF risk scores. Short-term administration of tolvaptan leading to aquaresis may be also associated with a blunt responsiveness of NP levels. Given the pharmacological mechanism, tolvaptan removes both intravascular and extravascular volumes equally, and thus NP levels that largely reflect elevated intracardiac filling pressures due to excess of the intravascular volume could be lower in patients with tolvaptan than those who were mainly treated with natriuretic agents. Accumulating evidence suggests that the major component of volume loss with natriuretic agents is derived from the extravascular compartment [ 16 ]. Therefore, the time needed for distribution of fluid out of extravascular spaces is a key factor to achieve balanced decongestive therapies. To discriminate unbalanced congestive status, several biomarkers (i.e. carbohydrate antigen 125, soluble CD146, adrenomedullin, and etc.) are known to be independently linked with excessive volume overload beyond NP levels [ 17 ]. Further investigation on these reliable biomarkers for clinical congestion and differences in their responsiveness to specific treatments is warranted in the HF patient population. Limitation For a thorough understanding of our results, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, this study was not based on data from randomized controlled trial, and thus unknown confounders may have influenced the results. Second, our findings may not be applicable to other countries as well as other regions of Japan because WET-HF2 consists of 8 tertiary hospitals around the Tokyo area. Third, in this study we did not assess long-term outcomes, such as post-discharge mortality, rehospitalization, and also quality of life in AHF patients. A clinically substantial improvement of NP levels during the index hospitalization was seen in both the tolvaptan and non-tolvaptan groups, though its impact on post-discharge outcomes may differ by each treatment. Finally, we did assess renal function with serum creatinine levels at two time points (admission and discharge), but we do not have data on their highest levels during the index hospitalization, which can misjudge the effect of tolvaptan on the serum creatinine level. Conclusion After revised the clinical practice guidelines for HF in Japan, tolvaptan usage for AHF patients has increased steadily, and tended to be used in lower-risk patients. However, in-hospital outcomes including mortality do not seem to be affected. It may be necessary to reconsider the role of tolvaptan, and further investigation on long-term outcomes is needed to identify patients who can benefit from tolvaptan, particularly given the relative high-cost associated with use of tolvaptan. Methods Study Design and Participants The West Tokyo Heart Failure (WET-HF) registry was launched in 2006 and thereafter added several institutions to several facilities. From January, 2006 to December, 2017, patients hospitalized for AHF were registered at 6 tertiary hospitals (Keio University Hospital, Kyorin University Hospital, Sakakibara Heart Institute, St. Luke’s International Hospital, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, and Saiseikai Central Hospital) in the Tokyo area [ 18 ]. After newly added 2 institutions (National Defence Medical College Hospital and National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center) into the facilities, the WET-HF2 registry reinitiated since April, 2018 with an update of the collecting variables, including use of tolvaptan during the index hospitalization. The WET-HF2 is a prospective multicenter cohort registry designed to collect data on clinical backgrounds and outcomes from consecutive HF patients who were hospitalized for requiring urgent treatment within 8 tertiary care hospitals in Tokyo, Japan. Individual cardiologists made the clinical diagnosis of AHF at each institution based on the Framingham criteria [ 19 ] and the level of natriuretic peptides (NPs): B-type natriuretic peptide ≥ 100 pg/mL or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ≥ 300 pg/mL at the time of hospitalization. Specifically, patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome or those with < 20 years old were not included in this database. To assess the care and patient outcomes, baseline data and outcomes were collected by trained clinical research coordinators using a web-based electronic data capture system. To ensure consecutive case enrollment, the senior investigators (Y.S., S.K., A.G., T.K., Y.N., M.S., Y.N., M.I., M.T., N.S., and S.N.) performed on-site auditing to ensure proper registration of each eligible patient. To ensure the accuracy of clinical events, the WET-HF registry is supported by a central study committee that adjudicates mode of death. Initially, all deaths were reviewed by investigators and then categorized into those in need of adjudication or those whose mode of death could be defined clearly. Central committee members reviewed the abstracted record and adjudicated mode of death. In this study, we analyzed data from 1,343 consecutive AHF patients who were registered in the WET-HF2 between April 2018 and October 2019. Before the launch of the WET-HF2 registry, the objective and detailed design are provided for the clinical trial registration with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000032169). The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards at each site, and the research was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. According to the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects and Personal Information Protection Law in Japan, informed consent was obtained from each subject before the study began. Study Endpoints and Definitions of Pertinent Variables The study’s primary endpoint was a trend in tolvaptan usage for AHF patients after the JCS/JHFS 2017 guideline for HF was published. Secondary endpoints included the in-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay (LOHS), changes in both serum creatinine and natriuretic peptide levels, and also a trend in the severity of HF status defined by a validated risk model. The Get With The Guideline-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk score is a particularly useful tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in AHF patients, and it has been validated in the Japanese AHF patients [ 20 , 21 ]. The GWTG-HF risk score was calculated based on the 7 variables at the time of admission including race (black or nonblack race), age, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, blood urea nitrogen, serum sodium, and presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with and ranged from 0 to 101, with a higher score reflecting higher risk of mortality [ 14 ]. Data on demographics, medical history, laboratory and other tests (such as electrocardiogram and echocardiogram), medications, procedures, and clinical outcomes during hospitalization and after discharge were recorded with minimum and maximum follow-ups for 2 and 5 years. Of note, vital signs, laboratory tests, and medications were evaluated at the time of admission and discharge. The New York Heart Association functional class was also evaluated at both admission and discharge by individual cardiologists at each institution and reviewed by the investigators. Left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiogram was assessed by the modified Simpson’s method during the index hospitalization after the stabilization of HF signs and symptoms. Statistical Analysis The results are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) for continuous variables and as counts and percentages for categorical variables. Statistical comparisons between the two groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the Pearson’s chi-squared test for categorical variables. An association between use of tolvaptan and the in-hospital mortality and LOHS were evaluated using the multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for the GWTG-HF risk score. The generalized linear model was used to assess an association of use of tolvaptan with an improvement rate of NP levels ([NP values at admission – NP values at discharge] / NP values at admission) with an adjustment for the GWTG-HF risk score. We also performed the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to assess the association between use of tolvaptan and a change in serum creatinine levels from admission to discharge, adjusted for age, sex, and serum creatinine levels at baseline. A time-trend of tolvaptan usage in the acute setting was described. We also parallelly examined a trend in the severity of HF status based on the GWTG-HF risk score among the two groups. The trend analysis of categorical variables was conducted by using the Cochran-Armitage test, and the trend of continuous variables were assessed by using linear regression model. All probability values were 2-tailed, values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 26.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and RStudio software, version 3.2.3. Declarations Acknowledgments: The authors thank Drs. Ayumi Goda, Mike Saji, Munenori Ikegami, Munehisa Sakamoto, Makoto Takei, Shintaro Nakano, and all the investigators, clinical research coordinators, and institutions involved in the administration of the WET-HF registry. Author Contributions: Yusuke Yamazaki, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Yuji Nagatomo, Takashi Kohno, Tsutomu Yoshikawa collected data and check the manuscript. Yusuke Yamazaki, Yasuyuki Shiraishi and Shun Kohsaka designed the study, and analyzed and interpreted data, and drafted manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. Funding: WET-HF registry was supported by a grant from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (S.K. 201439013C), a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (T.Y. JPSS KAKENHI, 23591062, 26461088; T.K. 17K09526), a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (Y.S. JPSS KAKENHI, 18K15860), a Grant-in-Aid for Clinical Research from the Japanese Circulation Society (Y.S. 2019), a Grant-in-Aid from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (S.K. H29-Refractory Disease-034), a Health Labor Science Research Grant (S.K. 14528506) and Sakakibara Clinical Research Grant for the Promotion of Science (T.Y. 2012 to 2020). Disclosures: The authors stated that no such relationships exist, and provided the following details: Dr. Shiraishi is affiliated with an endowed department by Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd., Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd., and BIOTRONIK JAPAN Inc., and received research grants from the SECOM Science and Technology Foundation and the Uehara Memorial Foundation and honoraria from Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Ono Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.; and Dr. Kohsaka received an unrestricted research grant from the Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., and Novartis Pharma Co., Ltd.. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products to declare. Open Access: The article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and you intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . References Domanski M, Norman J, Pitt B, Haigney M, Hanlon S, Peyster E. Diuretic use, progressive heart failure, and death in patients in the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:705-708 Ahmed A, Husain A, Love TE, et al. Heart failure, chronic diuretic use, and increase in mortality and hospitalization: an observational study using propensity score methods. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1431-9 Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al; 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2013;128:e240-327 Ponikowski P, Voors, AA, Anker SD, et al; 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2016;37:2129-2200 Takashi Kuragaichi, Yukihito Sato. Temporal trends of a vasopressin V 2 receptor antagonist in heart failure using a nationwide database in Japan. ESC Heart Failure 2021;8: 527-538 Tsutsui H, Isobe M, Ito H, Ito H, Okumura K, Ono M, Kitakaze M, Kinugawa K, et al. JCS 2017/JHFS 2017 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure- Digest Version. Circ J 2019;83:2084-2184 Matsue Y, Maaten J, Suzuki M, Torii S, Yamaguchi S, Fukamizu S, et al. Early Treatment With Tolvaptan Improves Diuretic Response in Acute Heart Failure With Renal Dysfunction. Clin Res Cardiol 2017;106:802-812 Inomata T, Ikeda Y, Kida K, Shibagaki Y, Sato N, et al. Effects of Additive Tolvapyan vs. Increased Furosemide on Heart Failure With Diuretic Resistance and Renal Impairment Results From the K-STAR Study. Circ J 2017;82:159-167 Gheorghiade M, Konstam MA, Burnett JC, et al. Short-term Clinical Effects of Tolvaptan, an Oral Vasopressin Antagonist, in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure. The EVEREST Clinical Status Trials. JAMA 2007;297:1332-1343 Felker GM, Mentz RJ, Cole RT, Adams KF, Egnaczyk GF, Fiuzat M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:1399-1406 Konstam MA, Kiernan M, Chandler A, Dhingra R, Mody FV, Eisen H, et al. Short-Term Effects of Tolvaptan in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Volume Overload. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:1409-1419 Shiraishi Y, Kohsaka Shun, Nogai T, Goda A, et al. Validation and Recalibration of seattle Heart Failure Model in Japanese Acute Heart Failure Patients. J Card Fail 2019;25:561-567 Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, et al. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation 2006;113:1424-33 Matsue Y, Shiraishi A, Kagiyama N, et al. Renal function on admission modifies prognostic impact of diuretics in acute heart failure: a propensity score matched and interaction analysis. Heart Vessels 2016;31:1980-1987 Stephen JG, Taylor ST, Raluca LL, et al. In-Hospital Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction in the United States. JACC Heart Failure 2020;8(11):943-953 Miller WL, Mullan BP. Understanding the heterogeneity in volume overload and fluid distributuin in decompensated heart failure is key to optimal volume management: role for blood volume quantitation. JACC Heart Fail 2014;2:298-305 Boorsma EM, Maaten JMT, Damman K, et al. Congestion in heart failure: a contemporary look at physiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020;17;641-655 Shiraishi Y, Kohsaka S, Sato N, Takano T, Kitai T, Yoshikawa T, et al. 9-Year Trend in the Management of Acute Heart Failure in Japan: A Report From the National Consortium of Acute Heart Failure Registries. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e008687 McKee PA, et al. The natural history of congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 1971;285:1441-1446 Peterson PN, Rumsfeld JS, Liang L, Albert NM, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, et al; American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure Program. A validated risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure from the American Heart Association get with the guidelines program. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:25-32 Shiraishi Y , Kohsaka S , Abe T , Mizuno A , Goda A , Izumi Y , et al. Validation of the Get With The Guideline-Heart Failure risk score in Japanese patients and the potential improvement of its discrimination ability by the inclusion of B-type natriuretic peptide level. Am Heart J 2016;171:33-9 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files Supplementalmaterials.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 03 Aug, 2021 Reviews received at journal 26 Jul, 2021 Reviewers agreed at journal 26 Jul, 2021 Reviewers invited by journal 22 Jul, 2021 Editor assigned by journal 22 Jul, 2021 Editor invited by journal 06 Jul, 2021 Submission checks completed at journal 06 Jul, 2021 First submitted to journal 05 Jul, 2021 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-689564","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":37577260,"identity":"792468b8-5a0c-4d40-a54d-78d304df26d2","order_by":0,"name":"Yusuke Yamazaki","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Keio University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yusuke","middleName":"","lastName":"Yamazaki","suffix":""},{"id":37577261,"identity":"d0b28bf0-a5a1-4544-b9a9-fc4634f83e8a","order_by":1,"name":"Yasuyuki Shiraishi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Keio University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yasuyuki","middleName":"","lastName":"Shiraishi","suffix":""},{"id":37577263,"identity":"1908c1f2-2ef9-460f-a9fb-d93fd45235ad","order_by":2,"name":"Shun Kohsaka","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Keio University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shun","middleName":"","lastName":"Kohsaka","suffix":""},{"id":37577264,"identity":"00cd4084-9159-4392-aa95-7f25d58ad2ae","order_by":3,"name":"Yuji Nagatomo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Defence Medical College Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yuji","middleName":"","lastName":"Nagatomo","suffix":""},{"id":37577265,"identity":"bfb50e96-4e7c-4f46-b9b0-8713d8bb8a67","order_by":4,"name":"Keiichi Fukuda","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Keio University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Keiichi","middleName":"","lastName":"Fukuda","suffix":""},{"id":37577266,"identity":"82cc04c7-b411-4870-b662-c7adb2ef4258","order_by":5,"name":"Takashi Kohno","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kyorin University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Takashi","middleName":"","lastName":"Kohno","suffix":""},{"id":37577267,"identity":"74b22ade-eb53-40e2-95ce-c791f1809ac3","order_by":6,"name":"Tsutomu Yoshikawa","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sakakibara Heart Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tsutomu","middleName":"","lastName":"Yoshikawa","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2021-07-05 15:14:13","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-689564/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-689564/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":11304291,"identity":"53f30ff5-61dc-4957-9e68-c80c95dd5362","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-07-09 15:19:49","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":227811,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Timing of tolvaptan usage during the index hospitalization\nThe median time of initiation of tolvaptan from hospitalization was 3 days.","description":"","filename":"Figure1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-689564/v1/4de97026218e607f9406d8b2.jpg"},{"id":11304051,"identity":"1a475471-a542-4880-9151-711353890717","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-07-09 15:16:49","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":247316,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Temporal trend for tolvaptan usage after revision of the JCS/JHFS guidelines\nThe usage of tolvaptan in the acute setting increased steadily but no statistical significance (p for trend = 0.07).","description":"","filename":"Figure2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-689564/v1/0315f322f42eb2984a16c63d.jpg"},{"id":11304049,"identity":"07fc758a-ecb4-4368-a617-890cd0b68be3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-07-09 15:16:49","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":281837,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Temporal trends for disease severity by the Get With The Guideline-Heart Failure [GWTG-HF] risk score\nThe GWTG-HF risk score in the tolvaptan group significantly decreased from 47 to 41 (p for trend = 0.015), while that in the non-tolvaptan group remained unchanged.","description":"","filename":"Figure3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-689564/v1/5d0be77a4c76b6c886e68f4d.jpg"},{"id":13703207,"identity":"b3b5e84b-4d9c-4cbf-a658-4598b352e00e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-17 13:39:48","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":497168,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-689564/v1/18cbadea-f27a-49ba-89cf-6e0de9b39c10.pdf"},{"id":11304052,"identity":"ecd65652-265d-4b30-a0a6-a194a4d925d8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-07-09 15:16:49","extension":"docx","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":31537,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Supplementalmaterials.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-689564/v1/b747532d95a42993cbd0e0fe.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eTemporal Trends in Tolvaptan Use After Revision of National Heart Failure Guidelines in Japan\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":" \u003cp\u003eClinical congestion is the primary pathophysiology that leads to impaired exercise capacity and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Diuretics continue to play an essential role in the treatment to relieve congestive signs and symptoms. Meanwhile, natriuretic agents (i.e. loop and /or thiazide-type diuretics) are also known to have a negative impact on clinical outcomes in patients with HF [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. In this context, clinical practice guidelines generally recommend use of natriuretic agents to achieve and maintain euvolemia with the lowest achievable dose [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTolvaptan, a vasopressin-2 receptor antagonist, leads to aquaresis without natriuresis-related electrolyte disturbances and is widely implemented in the modern HF management in Japan [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. Originally, the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) and Japanese Heart Failure Society (JHFS) 2017 guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure commend use of tolvaptan with low dose (7.5\u0026ndash;15 mg/day) for the treatment of fluid retention in patients not responding well to other diuretics including loop diuretics (Class IIa, Level of Evidence A) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. Favorable results on the surrogate outcomes (e.g. 48-hour urine volume) were demonstrated in the domestic trials with the usage of low-dose tolvaptan in Japan [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e], albeit more large-scale trials that were performed in Western countries failed to show the effect of a high-dose tolvaptan (30 mg/day) on improving the prognosis as well as HF symptoms in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR10\" citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese recommendations may have led to use of tolvaptan in a broader range of AHF patients. Herein, we aimed to examine the usage of tolvaptan by their risk profile in the Japanese inpatient-based multicenter registry of AHF patients. We also assessed an association of tolvaptan usage with in-hospital outcomes after revision of the JCS/JHFS clinical practice guidelines.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv class=\"Section2\" id=\"Sec3\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003ePatient characteristics\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe mean age of the patients was 78 (IQR 69\u0026ndash;85) years, and 62% were men with a systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and left ventricular ejection fraction of 135 (IQR 116\u0026ndash;160) mm Hg, 92 (IQR 74\u0026ndash;112) beat per minute, and 45% (IQR 31\u0026ndash;57%), respectively. Overall, 267 (19.9%) patients received oral tolvaptan during their index hospitalization. A half (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;132) of the tolvaptan group (an approved dose of tolvaptan 7.5\u0026ndash;15 mg/day in Japan) started an add-on tolvaptan to loop diuretics within 3 days after admission (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBaseline characteristics of the AHF patients at the time of admission were compared by dividing into two groups based on use of tolvaptan during their hospitalization (Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Compared with the non-tolvaptan group, the tolvaptan group had a higher serum creatinine level (1.21 [IQR 0.88\u0026ndash;1.72] mg/dL vs.1.07 [IQR 0.82\u0026ndash;1.46] mg/dL; p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) and a lower hemoglobin level (11.6 [IQR 9.8\u0026ndash;13.2] g/dL vs. 12.3 [IQR 10.6\u0026ndash;13.8] g/dL; p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001). As for medication before admission, the tolvaptan group tended to frequently use loop diuretics (61% vs. 44%; p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (27% vs. 17%; p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001). Also, the patient characteristics at the time of discharge by the tolvaptan and non-tolvaptan groups were presented in \u003cstrong\u003eTable S1\u003c/strong\u003e in the Online Supplement.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBaseline characteristics\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTolvaptan (-)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1,076\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTolvaptan (+)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;267\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAge, years\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e79 (68\u0026ndash;86)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e79 (71\u0026ndash;85)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.38\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMen, n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e678 (64)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e161 (60)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBody mass index, kg/m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.7 (20.2\u0026ndash;26.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23.4 (20.5\u0026ndash;26.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSystolic BP, mm Hg\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e136 (117\u0026ndash;161)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e134 (115\u0026ndash;157)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHeart rate, bpm\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e94 (75\u0026ndash;114)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e87 (73\u0026ndash;105)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLeft ventricular ejection fraction, %\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44 (32\u0026ndash;57)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e45 (31\u0026ndash;58)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.59\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGWTG-HF risk score\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e41 (35\u0026ndash;47)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e42 (36\u0026ndash;48)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEtiology, n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.03\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDCM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e152 (14)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22 (8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eICM\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e256 (24)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e66 (25)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eValvular\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e233 (22)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73 (27)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eOthers\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e435 (40)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e106 (40)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eComorbidities, n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHistory of HF hospitalization\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e381 (35)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e102 (38)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCoronary artery disease\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e288 (27)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e80 (30)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.35\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAtrial fibrillation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e449 (41)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e118 (45)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHypertension\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e651 (62)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e166 (64)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDiabetes mellitus\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e334 (31)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e89 (34)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDyslipidemia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e352 (33)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e103 (39)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.07\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStroke\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e128 (12)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e41 (14)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCOPD\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e56 (5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9 (3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.27\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDementia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e103 (10)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13 (5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLaboratory findings\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHemoglobin, g/dl\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.3 (10.6\u0026ndash;13.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.6 (9.8\u0026ndash;13.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCreatinine, mg/dl\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.07 (0.82\u0026ndash;1.46)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.21 (0.88\u0026ndash;1.72)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBUN, mg/dl\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.8 (17.0\u0026ndash;34.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26.3 (18.6\u0026ndash;41.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSodium, mEq/l\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e140.0 (138.0\u0026ndash;142.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e139.0 (136.0\u0026ndash;141.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAlbumin, mg/dl\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.5 (3.2\u0026ndash;3.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.5 (3.2\u0026ndash;3.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.71\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBNP, pg/ml *\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e763 (444\u0026ndash;1322)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e822 (499\u0026ndash;1414)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNT-proBNP, pg/ml *\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4235 (2457\u0026ndash;7860)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4846 (2380\u0026ndash;9678)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMedication before admission, n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eACEI or ARB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e402 (38)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e105 (43)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.55\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBeta blocker\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e467 (42)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e132 (49)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMRA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e185 (17)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73 (27)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDigoxin\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e33 (3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10 (4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.56\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLoop diuretics\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e479 (44)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e162 (61)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFurosemide equivalent, mg \u003csup\u003e$\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0 (0\u0026ndash;20)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20 (0\u0026ndash;40)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThiazide-type diuretics\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e37 (4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12 (4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIn-hospital treatment, n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLoop diuretics, iv\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e871 (81)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e225 (84)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVasodilators, iv\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e359 (33)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e93 (35)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.65\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInotropes, iv\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e118 (11)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e35 (13)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.32\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNon-invasive ventilation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e386 (36)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e126 (47)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIntubation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e34 (3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11 (4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIABP\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19 (2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6 (2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.61\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVA-ECMO / VAD\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9 (\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1 (\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003eBP, blood pressure; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; ICM, ischemic cardiomyopathy; HF, heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; ACEI; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB; angiotensin receptor blocker; MRA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; IABP, intraaortic balloon pumping; VA-ECMO, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; VAD, ventricular assist device.\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003e* In the 959 patients, BNP levels were measured, in contrast, NT-proBNP levels were measured in 384 patients.\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003e\u003csup\u003e$\u003c/sup\u003e Furosemide 20 mg\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Azosemide 30 mg\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Torsemide 4 mg\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"Section2\" id=\"Sec4\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eTime trend of tolvaptan usage and GWTG-HF risk score\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDuring the study period after revision of the JCS/JHFS clinical practice guidelines on March 2018, the tolvaptan usage steadily increased from 13.0\u0026ndash;28.7% over time, but with no statistical significance (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e for trend\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.07) (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Notably, the average GWTG-HF risk score in the tolvaptan group has significantly decreased from 47 to 41 over the study period (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e for trend\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.015), while the score in the non-tolvaptan group remained unchanged (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"Section2\" id=\"Sec5\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eTolvaptan usage and in-hospital outcomes\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRegardless of tolvaptan usage, no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality rate was observed (6.7% in the tolvaptan group vs. 5.8% in the non-tolvaptan group, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.56), even after adjusted for the GWTG-HF risk score. Meanwhile, the tolvaptan group had a longer LOHS compared with the non-tolvaptan group (23 [IQR 14\u0026ndash;33] days vs. 16 [IQR 9\u0026ndash;24] days; p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e shows the change in clinical and laboratory data of the patients who were successfully discharged. In the tolvaptan group, body weight significantly decreased by 5.4 kg [IQR 3.0\u0026ndash;8.5] compared with that in the non-tolvaptan group (4.4 kg [IQR 2.2\u0026ndash;7.3]; p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.004). Meanwhile, the improvement rate of NP levels from admission to discharge in the tolvaptan group was significantly lower than that in the non-tolvaptan group: 56.9% [IQR 25.3\u0026ndash;74.9] in the tolvaptan group vs. 62.3% [IQR 38.2\u0026ndash;80.4] in the non-tolvaptan group (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.006). Even in the multivariable linear regression model adjusting for the GWTG-HF risk score, tolvaptan usage remained to be associated with a lower improvement rate of NP levels (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.006). In addition, there was no difference in a change in serum creatinine levels from admission to discharge between the two groups (0.05 mg/dL [95% confidence interval, -0.04\u0026ndash;0.15] in the tolvaptan group vs. -0.02 mg/dL [95% confidence interval, -0.07\u0026ndash;0.03] in the non-tolvaptan group, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.16 for ANCOVA).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" id=\"Tab2\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eChanges in clinical variables during the index hospitalization\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTolvaptan (-)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1,014\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTolvaptan (+)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003en\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;249\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eP value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBody weight (kg)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-4.4 (-7.3 \u0026ndash; -2.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-5.4 (-8.5 \u0026ndash; -3.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.004\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSystolic BP, mm Hg\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-25 (-47 \u0026ndash; -7.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-25 (-45 \u0026ndash; -6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.58\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHeart rate, bpm\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-20 (-42 \u0026ndash; -3.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-13 (-30\u0026ndash;0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHemoglobin, g/dl\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0 (-0.9\u0026ndash;0.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.1 (-1.2\u0026ndash;1.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCreatinine, mg/dl\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.02 (-0.07\u0026ndash;0.03)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.05 (-0.04\u0026ndash;0.15)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBUN, mg/dl\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.40 (-6.1\u0026ndash;6.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.0 (-5.0\u0026ndash;9.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.005\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSodium, mEq/l\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-1.0 (-3.0\u0026ndash;1.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0 (-3.0\u0026ndash;3.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.035\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAlbumin, mg/dl\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.10 (-0.40\u0026ndash;0.20)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e-0.10 (-0.50\u0026ndash;0.20)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.16\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNatriuretic peptides, %*\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e56.9 (25.3\u0026ndash;74.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e62.3 (38.3\u0026ndash;80.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003e* The change in natriuretic peptide (NP) levels, including either B-type natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, was defined as ([NP values at admission \u0026ndash; NP values at discharge] / NP values at admission).\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhen dividing the patients receiving tolvaptan into 2 groups by the median time of initiation of tolvaptan, the early tolvaptan group that started tolvaptan within 3 days from hospitalization, compared with the late tolvaptan group (4 or more days after hospitalization), showed almost similar baseline characteristics, other than serum creatinine levels: 1.39 [IQR 0.96\u0026ndash;1.93] mg/dl in the early group vs. 1.03 [IQR 0.83\u0026ndash;1.62] mg/dl in the late group (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) (\u003cstrong\u003eTable S2\u003c/strong\u003e in the Online Supplement). No statistical difference in the GWTG-HF risk score was observed between the early and late tolvaptan groups. The early group has a shorter LOHS than the late group (20 [IQR 12\u0026ndash;30] days vs. 28 [IQR 19\u0026ndash;43] days; p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), while no difference in the in-hospital mortality rate was observed between the two groups (6.8% in the early group vs. 6.6% in the late group; p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.58).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":" \u003cp\u003eUsing this prospective multicenter registry, we demonstrated the following findings: 1) tolvaptan tends to be significantly used in patients with renal impairment as well as those who had loop diuretics and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists at baseline; 2) during the study period, tolvaptan usage has increased from 13.0\u0026ndash;28.7% over time, but with no statistical significance; 3) in the tolvaptan group, the average GWTG-HF risk score has significantly decreased albeit that in the non-tolvaptan group has unchanged over the study period; and 4) irrespective of tolvaptan usage, there were no between-differences in the in-hospital mortality rate.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWithin the international clinical practice guidelines and expert's statements of the treatment for AHF patients, up-titration of intravenous loop diuretics is emphasized preferentially, while use of other diuretics in combination is commended after administration of a substantial dose of loop diuretics to reach the ceiling dose [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e]. The JCS/JHFS 2017 guidelines also state a directionally similar approach to diuretic-resistant cases [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. In this context, the nationwide claim-based database in Japan (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;235,487) reported that tolvaptan usage for AHF patients increased steadily from 3.2% in 2011 to 39.0% in 2018 and the timing of tolvaptan usage became gradually early, and consequently tolvaptan was used within 2 days after admission among more than half of patients who received tolvaptan [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e], which is comparable with our data. On another front, our data as with other observational studies showed that the baseline diuretic dose (20\u0026ndash;40 mg furosemide equivalent) in Japanese patients was historically lower than that in Western patients [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. Intravenous administration of loop diuretics for AHF patients is also quantitatively low in Japanese clinical practice: A multicenter observational study described that the median dose of intravenous furosemide was 60 mg (IQR 20\u0026ndash;100 mg) within 48 hours of admission in AHF patients [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. Despite a lack of clear reasons on low-dose diuretics in Japan, it may be explained by differences in pharmacokinetics and/or body mass index between ethnicities. Although we have no data on the dose of intravenous furosemide and are unable to examine an association of up-titration of loop diuretics and add-on tolvaptan with patient outcomes, results from our study and the previous study [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e] seem to show that physicians in Japan preferentially implement the initial sequential nephron blockade strategy with tolvaptan relative to up-titration of loop diuretics in clinical practice. In the United States, however, one fifth to one third of inpatients with HF had in-hospital treatment escalated beyond initial intravenous diuretic therapy (i.e., up-titration of intravenous diuretics) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e] while 30\u0026ndash;40% of AHF patients in Japan added tolvaptan into intravenous furosemide, reflecting a possibility that the initial dose of loop diuretics for AHF patients may not be sufficient in Japan. Future research is warranted to revalidate the position of 2nd -line diuretics, such as tolvaptan and thiazide-type diuretics, in the treatment for HF and identify patients who can benefit from tolvaptan, given that no clear recommendation with robust clinical evidence to the best diuretic regimen for diuretic-resistant cases.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study also found no association of tolvaptan usage with in-hospital mortality, regardless of the timing of its administration, as with the results from prior clinical trials [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR10\" citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. On the contrary, the tolvaptan group had a longer LOHS with a greater body weight reduction and lower improvement rate of NP levels during hospitalization. This can be in part explained by more patients at advanced stages of HF in the tolvaptan group, reflecting renal impairment, anemia, and higher GWTG-HF risk scores. Short-term administration of tolvaptan leading to aquaresis may be also associated with a blunt responsiveness of NP levels. Given the pharmacological mechanism, tolvaptan removes both intravascular and extravascular volumes equally, and thus NP levels that largely reflect elevated intracardiac filling pressures due to excess of the intravascular volume could be lower in patients with tolvaptan than those who were mainly treated with natriuretic agents. Accumulating evidence suggests that the major component of volume loss with natriuretic agents is derived from the extravascular compartment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, the time needed for distribution of fluid out of extravascular spaces is a key factor to achieve balanced decongestive therapies. To discriminate unbalanced congestive status, several biomarkers (i.e. carbohydrate antigen 125, soluble CD146, adrenomedullin, and etc.) are known to be independently linked with excessive volume overload beyond NP levels [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. Further investigation on these reliable biomarkers for clinical congestion and differences in their responsiveness to specific treatments is warranted in the HF patient population.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Limitation","content":" \u003cp\u003eFor a thorough understanding of our results, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, this study was not based on data from randomized controlled trial, and thus unknown confounders may have influenced the results. Second, our findings may not be applicable to other countries as well as other regions of Japan because WET-HF2 consists of 8 tertiary hospitals around the Tokyo area. Third, in this study we did not assess long-term outcomes, such as post-discharge mortality, rehospitalization, and also quality of life in AHF patients. A clinically substantial improvement of NP levels during the index hospitalization was seen in both the tolvaptan and non-tolvaptan groups, though its impact on post-discharge outcomes may differ by each treatment. Finally, we did assess renal function with serum creatinine levels at two time points (admission and discharge), but we do not have data on their highest levels during the index hospitalization, which can misjudge the effect of tolvaptan on the serum creatinine level.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Conclusion","content":" \u003cp\u003eAfter revised the clinical practice guidelines for HF in Japan, tolvaptan usage for AHF patients has increased steadily, and tended to be used in lower-risk patients. However, in-hospital outcomes including mortality do not seem to be affected. It may be necessary to reconsider the role of tolvaptan, and further investigation on long-term outcomes is needed to identify patients who can benefit from tolvaptan, particularly given the relative high-cost associated with use of tolvaptan.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":" \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStudy Design and Participants\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe West Tokyo Heart Failure (WET-HF) registry was launched in 2006 and thereafter added several institutions to several facilities. From January, 2006 to December, 2017, patients hospitalized for AHF were registered at 6 tertiary hospitals (Keio University Hospital, Kyorin University Hospital, Sakakibara Heart Institute, St. Luke\u0026rsquo;s International Hospital, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, and Saiseikai Central Hospital) in the Tokyo area [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. After newly added 2 institutions (National Defence Medical College Hospital and National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center) into the facilities, the WET-HF2 registry reinitiated since April, 2018 with an update of the collecting variables, including use of tolvaptan during the index hospitalization. The WET-HF2 is a prospective multicenter cohort registry designed to collect data on clinical backgrounds and outcomes from consecutive HF patients who were hospitalized for requiring urgent treatment within 8 tertiary care hospitals in Tokyo, Japan. Individual cardiologists made the clinical diagnosis of AHF at each institution based on the Framingham criteria [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e] and the level of natriuretic peptides (NPs): B-type natriuretic peptide\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;100 pg/mL or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;300 pg/mL at the time of hospitalization. Specifically, patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome or those with \u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;20 years old were not included in this database.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo assess the care and patient outcomes, baseline data and outcomes were collected by trained clinical research coordinators using a web-based electronic data capture system. To ensure consecutive case enrollment, the senior investigators (Y.S., S.K., A.G., T.K., Y.N., M.S., Y.N., M.I., M.T., N.S., and S.N.) performed on-site auditing to ensure proper registration of each eligible patient. To ensure the accuracy of clinical events, the WET-HF registry is supported by a central study committee that adjudicates mode of death. Initially, all deaths were reviewed by investigators and then categorized into those in need of adjudication or those whose mode of death could be defined clearly. Central committee members reviewed the abstracted record and adjudicated mode of death. In this study, we analyzed data from 1,343 consecutive AHF patients who were registered in the WET-HF2 between April 2018 and October 2019. Before the launch of the WET-HF2 registry, the objective and detailed design are provided for the clinical trial registration with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000032169). The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards at each site, and the research was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. According to the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects and Personal Information Protection Law in Japan, informed consent was obtained from each subject before the study began.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStudy Endpoints and Definitions of Pertinent Variables\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e The study\u0026rsquo;s primary endpoint was a trend in tolvaptan usage for AHF patients after the JCS/JHFS 2017 guideline for HF was published. Secondary endpoints included the in-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay (LOHS), changes in both serum creatinine and natriuretic peptide levels, and also a trend in the severity of HF status defined by a validated risk model. The Get With The Guideline-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk score is a particularly useful tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in AHF patients, and it has been validated in the Japanese AHF patients [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. The GWTG-HF risk score was calculated based on the 7 variables at the time of admission including race (black or nonblack race), age, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, blood urea nitrogen, serum sodium, and presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with and ranged from 0 to 101, with a higher score reflecting higher risk of mortality [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eData on demographics, medical history, laboratory and other tests (such as electrocardiogram and echocardiogram), medications, procedures, and clinical outcomes during hospitalization and after discharge were recorded with minimum and maximum follow-ups for 2 and 5 years. Of note, vital signs, laboratory tests, and medications were evaluated at the time of admission and discharge. The New York Heart Association functional class was also evaluated at both admission and discharge by individual cardiologists at each institution and reviewed by the investigators. Left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiogram was assessed by the modified Simpson\u0026rsquo;s method during the index hospitalization after the stabilization of HF signs and symptoms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe results are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) for continuous variables and as counts and percentages for categorical variables. Statistical comparisons between the two groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the Pearson\u0026rsquo;s chi-squared test for categorical variables. An association between use of tolvaptan and the in-hospital mortality and LOHS were evaluated using the multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for the GWTG-HF risk score. The generalized linear model was used to assess an association of use of tolvaptan with an improvement rate of NP levels ([NP values at admission \u0026ndash; NP values at discharge] / NP values at admission) with an adjustment for the GWTG-HF risk score. We also performed the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to assess the association between use of tolvaptan and a change in serum creatinine levels from admission to discharge, adjusted for age, sex, and serum creatinine levels at baseline.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA time-trend of tolvaptan usage in the acute setting was described. We also parallelly examined a trend in the severity of HF status based on the GWTG-HF risk score among the two groups. The trend analysis of categorical variables was conducted by using the Cochran-Armitage test, and the trend of continuous variables were assessed by using linear regression model. All probability values were 2-tailed, values of P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 26.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and RStudio software, version 3.2.3.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e "},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors thank Drs. Ayumi Goda, Mike Saji, Munenori Ikegami, Munehisa Sakamoto, Makoto Takei, Shintaro Nakano, and all the investigators, clinical research coordinators, and institutions involved in the administration of the WET-HF registry.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contributions:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eYusuke Yamazaki, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Yuji Nagatomo, Takashi Kohno, Tsutomu Yoshikawa collected data and check the manuscript. Yusuke Yamazaki, Yasuyuki Shiraishi and Shun Kohsaka designed the study, and analyzed and interpreted data, and drafted manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eWET-HF registry was supported by a grant from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (S.K. 201439013C), a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (T.Y. JPSS KAKENHI, 23591062, 26461088; T.K. 17K09526), a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (Y.S. JPSS KAKENHI, 18K15860), a Grant-in-Aid for Clinical Research from the Japanese Circulation Society (Y.S. 2019), a Grant-in-Aid from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (S.K. H29-Refractory Disease-034), a Health Labor Science Research Grant (S.K. 14528506) and Sakakibara Clinical Research Grant for the Promotion of Science (T.Y. 2012 to 2020).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDisclosures:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors stated that no such relationships exist, and provided the following details: Dr. Shiraishi is affiliated with an endowed department by Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd., Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd., and BIOTRONIK JAPAN Inc., and received research grants from the SECOM Science and Technology Foundation and the Uehara Memorial Foundation and honoraria from Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Ono Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.; and Dr. Kohsaka received an unrestricted research grant from the Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., and Novartis Pharma Co., Ltd.. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products to declare.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOpen Access:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article\u0026rsquo;s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article\u0026rsquo;s Creative Commons license and you intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit \u003ca href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/\"\u003ehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDomanski M, Norman J, Pitt B, Haigney M, Hanlon S, Peyster E. Diuretic use, progressive heart failure, and death in patients in the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eJ Am Coll Cardiol\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2003;42:705-708\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAhmed A, Husain A, Love TE, et al. Heart failure, chronic diuretic use, and increase in mortality and hospitalization: an observational study using propensity score methods. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEur Heart J\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2006;27:1431-9\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eYancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al; 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCirculation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2013;128:e240-327\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePonikowski P, Voors, AA, Anker SD, et al; 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEur Heart J\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2016;37:2129-2200\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTakashi Kuragaichi, Yukihito Sato. Temporal trends of a vasopressin V\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e receptor antagonist in heart failure using a nationwide database in Japan. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eESC Heart Failure\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2021;8: 527-538\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTsutsui H, Isobe M, Ito H, Ito H, Okumura K, Ono M, Kitakaze M, Kinugawa K, et al. JCS 2017/JHFS 2017 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure- Digest Version. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCirc J\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e2019;83:2084-2184\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMatsue Y, Maaten J, Suzuki M, Torii S, Yamaguchi S, Fukamizu S, et al. Early Treatment With Tolvaptan Improves Diuretic Response in Acute Heart Failure With Renal Dysfunction. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eClin Res Cardiol\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2017;106:802-812\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eInomata T, Ikeda Y, Kida K, Shibagaki Y, Sato N, et al. Effects of Additive Tolvapyan vs. Increased Furosemide on Heart Failure With Diuretic Resistance and Renal Impairment Results From the K-STAR Study. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCirc J\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2017;82:159-167\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGheorghiade M, Konstam MA, Burnett JC, et al. Short-term Clinical Effects of Tolvaptan, an Oral Vasopressin Antagonist, in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure. The EVEREST Clinical Status Trials. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eJAMA\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2007;297:1332-1343\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFelker GM, Mentz RJ, Cole RT, Adams KF, Egnaczyk GF, Fiuzat M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eJ Am Coll Cardiol\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2017;69:1399-1406\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKonstam MA, Kiernan M, Chandler A, Dhingra R, Mody FV, Eisen H, et al. Short-Term Effects of Tolvaptan in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Volume Overload. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eJ Am Coll Cardiol\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2017;69:1409-1419\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eShiraishi Y, Kohsaka Shun, Nogai T, Goda A, et al. Validation and Recalibration of seattle Heart Failure Model in Japanese Acute Heart Failure Patients.\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eJ Card Fail\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2019;25:561-567\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLevy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, et al. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCirculation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2006;113:1424-33\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMatsue Y, Shiraishi A, Kagiyama N, et al. Renal function on admission modifies prognostic impact of diuretics in acute heart failure: a propensity score matched and interaction analysis. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eHeart Vessels\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2016;31:1980-1987\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eStephen JG, Taylor ST, Raluca LL, et al. In-Hospital Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction in the United States. \u003cstrong\u003eJACC Heart Failure\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e2020;8(11):943-953\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMiller WL, Mullan BP. Understanding the heterogeneity in volume overload and fluid distributuin in decompensated heart failure is key to optimal volume management: role for blood volume quantitation. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eJACC Heart Fail\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2014;2:298-305\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBoorsma EM, Maaten JMT, Damman K, et al. Congestion in heart failure: a contemporary look at physiology, diagnosis and treatment. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNat Rev Cardiol\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2020;17;641-655\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eShiraishi Y, Kohsaka S, Sato N, Takano T, Kitai T, Yoshikawa T, et al. 9-Year Trend in the Management of Acute Heart Failure in Japan: A Report From the National Consortium of Acute Heart Failure Registries.\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;J Am Heart Assoc\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2018;7:e008687\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMcKee PA, et al. The natural history of congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eN Engl J Med\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 1971;285:1441-1446\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePeterson PN, Rumsfeld JS, Liang L, Albert NM, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, et al; American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure Program. A validated risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure from the American Heart Association get with the guidelines program. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCirc Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2010;3:25-32\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shiraishi%20Y%5BAuthor%5D\u0026cauthor=true\u0026cauthor_uid=26699598\"\u003eShiraishi Y\u003c/a\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Kohsaka%20S%5BAuthor%5D\u0026cauthor=true\u0026cauthor_uid=26699598\"\u003eKohsaka S\u003c/a\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Abe%20T%5BAuthor%5D\u0026cauthor=true\u0026cauthor_uid=26699598\"\u003eAbe T\u003c/a\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Mizuno%20A%5BAuthor%5D\u0026cauthor=true\u0026cauthor_uid=26699598\"\u003eMizuno A\u003c/a\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Goda%20A%5BAuthor%5D\u0026cauthor=true\u0026cauthor_uid=26699598\"\u003eGoda A\u003c/a\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Izumi%20Y%5BAuthor%5D\u0026cauthor=true\u0026cauthor_uid=26699598\"\u003eIzumi Y\u003c/a\u003e, et al.\u0026nbsp;Validation of the Get With The Guideline-Heart Failure risk score in Japanese patients and the potential improvement of its discrimination ability by the inclusion of B-type natriuretic peptide level. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAm Heart J\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e 2016;171:33-9\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"acute heart failure, tolvaptan, mortality, natriuretic peptide, renal impairment","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-689564/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-689564/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eWithin no definite diuretic protocol for acute heart failure (AHF) patients and its variation in regional clinical guidelines, the latest national guidelines in Japan commends use of tolvaptan in diuretic-resistant patients. This study aimed to examine trends in tolvaptan usage and associated outcomes of AHF patients requiring hospitalization. Between April, 2018 and October, 2019, 1343 consecutive AHF patients (median 78 [69–85] y/o) were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter registry in Japan. Trends over time in tolvaptan usage, along with the severity of heart failure status based on the Get With The Guideline-Heart Failure [GWTG-HF] risk score, and in-hospital outcomes were investigated. During the study period, tolvaptan usage has increased from 13.0% to 28.7% over time (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e for trend=0.07), and 49.4% started tolvaptan within 3 days after admission. The GWTG-HF risk score in the tolvaptan group has significantly decreased over time, while that in the non-tolvaptan group has unchanged. There were no differences in the in-hospital mortality rate between the patients with and without tolvaptan (6.7% vs. 5.8%). After revision of the Japanese clinical practice guidelines for AHF in March 2018, tolvaptan usage for AHF patients has steadily increased. However, in-hospital outcomes including mortality do not seem to be affected.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Temporal Trends in Tolvaptan Use After Revision of National Heart Failure Guidelines in Japan","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-07-09 15:16:47","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-689564/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2021-08-03T11:08:04+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2021-07-26T15:35:16+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"0cf31e46-5628-4150-8b32-a682b07179a1","date":"2021-07-26T15:22:07+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2021-07-22T12:54:42+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2021-07-22T06:57:58+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2021-07-06T07:23:26+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2021-07-06T07:21:58+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2021-07-05T15:13:26+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"9efc3e36-28db-478a-8fe5-e1bd8d25e034","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 9th, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":5545997,"name":"Cardiac \u0026 Cardiovascular Systems"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-08-19T07:59:06+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2021-07-09 15:16:47","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-689564","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-689564","identity":"rs-689564","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"WrCJVZZCHTDjtuVLN7oU0","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.