TCRseek: Scalable Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search for T-Cell Receptor Repertoires via Windowed k-mer Embeddings

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,181 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The rapid growth of T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing data has created an urgent need for computational methods that can efficiently search CDR3 sequences at scale. Existing approaches either rely on exact pairwise distance computation, which scales quadratically with repertoire size, or employ heuristic grouping that sacrifices sensitivity. Here we present TCRseek, a two-stage retrieval framework that combines biologically informed sequence embeddings with approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) indexing for scalable search over TCR repertoires. TCRseek first encodes CDR3 amino acid sequences into fixed-length numerical vectors through a multi-scale windowed k-mer embedding scheme derived from BLOSUM62 eigendecomposition, then indexes these vectors using FAISS-based structures (IVF-Flat, IVF-PQ, or HNSW-Flat) that support sublinear-time search. A second-stage reranking module refines the shortlisted candidates using exact sequence alignment scores (Needleman–Wunsch with BLOSUM62), Levenshtein distance, or Hamming distance. We benchmarked TCRseek against tcrdist3, TCRMatch, and GIANA on a 100,000-sequence corpus with precomputed exact ground truth under three distance metrics. Under cross-metric evaluation—where the reranking and ground truth metrics differ, providing the most informative test of generalization—TCRseek achieved NDCG@10 = 0.890 (Levenshtein ground truth) and 0.880 (Hamming ground truth), ranking highest among the retained baselines under Hamming and remaining competitive with tcrdist3 (0.894) under Levenshtein. When the reranking metric matches the ground truth definition (BLOSUM62 alignment), NDCG@10 reached 0.993, confirming that the ANN shortlist captures >99% of true neighbors—the expected ceiling of the two-stage design. On the 100,000-sequence corpus, TCRseek achieved 3.6–39.6× speedup over exact brute-force search depending on index type and distance metric, with the largest gains for alignment-based retrieval. These results demonstrate that embedding-based ANN search provides a practical and scalable alternative for TCR repertoire analysis. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00