Experimental SARS-CoV-2 infection using horseshoe bats

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,602 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Horseshoe bats are known as the natural reservoir of sarbecoviruses. To understand how horseshoe bats coexist with sarbecoviruses in nature, experimental infection can provide direct evidence. However, in vivo infection studies using horseshoe bats have been lacking because of the difficulty of maintaining insectivorous bats in a laboratory setting. Here, we established a stable husbandry system for greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) and performed experimental infection with SARS-CoV-2. In contrast to Syrian hamsters which showed substantial viral replication, infected horseshoe bats exhibited low-level but persistent viral replication in the lung without overt disease. Histological analyses revealed that inflammatory lesions in the bat lungs were spatially restricted and temporally delayed compared with those in hamsters. Transcriptomic analyses further showed preferential activation of tissue repair pathways but limited inflammatory responses following infection. Notably, bats expressed several interferon-stimulated genes prior to infection. Our results suggest that a host strategy combining constitutive antiviral state, limited inflammation and enhanced tissue repair may result in controlled viral replication without overt disease, likely enabling horseshoe bats to coexist with sarbecoviruses. Competing Interest Statement KS has consulting fees from Moderna Japan, Takeda Pharmaceutical and Shionogi & Co., and honoraria for lectures from Gilead Sciences, Moderna Japan, Astrazeneca, and Shionogi & Co. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00