Overexpression of Ginkbilobin-2 homologous domain gene to enhance the tolerance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in plants of European chestnut | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Overexpression of Ginkbilobin-2 homologous domain gene to enhance the tolerance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in plants of European chestnut Susana Serrazina, María Teresa Martínez, Silvia Valladares, Lucía Del Castillo, and 7 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7973831/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 09 Jan, 2026 Read the published version in BMC Genomics → Version 1 posted 9 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Castanea sativa , a species of high ecological and economic relevance in Europe, faces severe threats from root rot caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi . To explore genetic strategies for enhancing disease tolerance, we investigated the functional role of a chestnut gene homologous to Ginkgo biloba ’s ginkbilobin-2 ( Cast_Gnk2-like ), known for its antifungal properties. Using Agrobacterium tumefaciens -mediated transformation, the Cast_Gnk2-like gene was introduced into somatic embryos from two embryogenic chestnut lines. Transformation efficiency was genotype-dependent, and varied from 14.2% to 2.5%. Twelve independent transgenic lines were confirmed by PCR, and each was estimated to carry a single copy of the transgene. Gene expression analysis revealed significant Cast_Gnk2-like transcript levels in two transgenic lines. Following cold storage and germination treatment, viable transgenic plants were regenerated. Disease tolerance assays demonstrated that Cast_Gnk2-like overexpression significantly reduced root necrosis and symptom severity, indicating enhanced tolerance to P. cinnamomi . These findings highlight the potential of targeted gene overexpression to improve disease resilience in chestnut through genetic engineering. Agrobacterium tumefaciens Castanea sativa Cysteine-rich repeat secretory protein Genetic transformation In vitro tolerance assays Ink disease Somatic embryos Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Background Among the chestnut species, Castanea sativa Mill. is considered the only native species of the genus in Europe with a circum-Mediterranean distribution that extends from the Atlantic to the Caspian Sea [ 1 ]. Although primarily a forest tree, chestnut is also used in agriculture as a cultivated crop. Chestnut trees can appear isolated, forming groves of pure masses or in mixed masses together with different oak species or pines, although it is frequently to appear forming pure masses of anthropic origin called chestnut groves (in Spanish castañero s or soutos or in Portuguese castanhais ) [ 2 ]. Chestnut agrosystems have been declared of community interest habitat within Directive 92/43/CEE of the European Union [ 3 ], to promote their conservation, especially taking into account the threats that weigh on them and their great economic, ecological and social value. The species is valued for its high-quality wood and edible fruits, the chestnuts, whose cultivation is rising due to strong demand and versatile uses (dried, purees, flours, jams, preserves, stews, or marron glacé) [ 4 , 5 ]. Worldwide production is estimated at 2.21 Mt per year, with contributions from about 46 countries, 27 of them in Europe [ 6 ]. In addition, in the last years, chestnut fruits are being used to fed Galician pork from which are yielded high-quality products such as Chestnut-fed Galician ham pork, as well as a variety of premium cold meat [ 7 ]. The chestnut tree is also an emblematic species that supports a large number of traditional uses, being part of our culture for centuries as a food resource, essential for people and livestock, as well as an element of construction, crafts and essential fuel in many towns, also constituting one of the best examples of a comprehensive and sustainable productive ecosystem [ 8 ]. Chestnut ecosystems are also closely linked with tourism, leisure and well-being, and their exploitation as mentioned before represents a fundamental pillar for rural development in less productive areas, where the creation of employment and generation of income are vital. Root-rot or ink disease ( Phytophthora spp. ) and chestnut blight ( Cryphonectria parasitica (Murrill) Barr) are the most significant threats to European chestnut [ 9 ]. Due to the economic and ecological importance of this species, breeding programs have long sought to develop Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands (Pc)-resistant genotypes [ 10 – 14 ]. Traditional breeding efforts have led to the development of tolerant hybrids through controlled crosses between C. sativa and resistant Asian species ( C. crenata and C. mollissima ). However, many of these hybrids usually present lower fruit quality compared to pure C. sativa . While hybrid rootstocks have proven highly effective in mitigating Pc damage, they have demonstrated limited adaptability to colder and drier conditions in southern areas, where late frosts and droughts can compromise their survival [ 15 ]. Despite these limitations, they remain the only viable strategy against ink disease to ensure the sustainability of European chestnut orchards. One of the main challenges of conventional breeding in trees is the long time required to obtain new tolerant genotypes due to their biological cycle. To overcome this limitation, modern breeding programs now integrate genomic tools to accelerate the selection process and enhance precision. The use of transcriptomics, genetic mapping, and histopathology has provided key insights into the resistance mechanisms of Asian species, facilitating their transfer to C. sativa [ 16 – 19 ]. Notably, transcriptomic analyses identified several defence-related genes, including those involved in pathogen recognition, cell wall reinforcement, hormonal signalling pathways (salicylic acid, ethylene, and jasmonic acid), and antifungal activity. Among them, the Cast_Gnk2 like gene of C. crenata , encoding an antifungal protein, emerged as a key marker distinguishing resistant from susceptible chestnut genotypes [ 17 ]. This gene was subsequently used in Agrobacterium -mediated transformation studies of embryogenic chestnut lines, as well as for protein purification and functional validation [ 20 – 22 ]. Genetic transformation of the disease-prone Castanea species with antifungal or antimicrobial genes to increase disease resistance or tolerance is a reliable and complementary biotechnological alternative to conventional breeding efforts [ 23 ]. In European chestnut a genetic transformation protocol with marker genes was described for the first time by [ 24 ], and later optimized by [ 25 , 26 ] through somatic embryogenesis. Subsequently, since the genes involved on chestnut tolerance to Pc and C. parasitica were unknown, two pathogenesis-related proteins, namely a thaumatin-like protein [ 27 ] and a chitinase [ 28 ], were overexpressed in chestnut somatic embryos to assess their impact on the diseases affecting this species. However, in the last few years, considerable information about the mechanisms and genes involved on tolerance to Pc has been described, as the already focused Cast_Gnk2-like , that may play a role in resistance to this oomycete pathogen. Cast_Gnk2-like encodes a cysteine-rich repeat secretory protein and notably shares homology with Ginkbilobin2 (Gnk2), produced in gymnosperms in response to both biotic and abiotic stresses [ 29 ], further underscoring its potential involvement in stress-related defence mechanisms in other plant species. In Ginkgo biloba , Gnk2 is a secreted protein which binds with high affinity to D-mannose, being related with the attachment and disturbance to the cell wall of plant pathogenic fungi [ 29 ]. In previous reports, our group has overexpressed this antifungal gene on somatic embryos of holm oak and cork oak, and plants that overexpressed Cast_Gnk2-like survived more days than wild type controls during in vitro tests with the pathogen [ 20 , 22 ]. After the functional analysis studies of Cast_Gnk2-like in Pc-susceptible oaks, it's now the turn of C. sativa , with the objectives of the present work being the following: 1) Genetic transformation of C. sativa embryogenic cultures with the antifungal gene Cast_Gnk2-like and evaluation of transformation efficiency; 2) Molecular characterisation of transgenic lines; and 3) Plant regeneration and evaluation of their tolerance to Pc. Material and methods Plant material Embryonic lines named CI-3 and CI-9 were used as a source of explants to carry out the transformation experiments. These lines were maintained by secondary embryogenesis as described in [ 23 ] with subcultures at 6-week intervals in proliferation medium defined as Murashige and Skoog medium [ 30 ] with half-strength macronutrients and supplemented with 0.1 mg/l benzyladenine (BA), 0.1 mg/l naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 3% sucrose (w/v), 0.7% Agar Sigma (w/v; A-1296, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The embryogenic lines were cultured under a 16-h photoperiod (provided by cool-white fluorescent lamps at a photon flux density of 50–60 µmol m − 2 s − 1 ) and 25ºC light/20ºC dark temperatures (standard conditions). Phytophtora cinnamomi Rands Phytophtora cinnamomi strain was kindly provided by TRAGSA (Maceda nursery, Orense, Spain) and isolated by the Center for Research and Technology of Extremadura (CYCYTEX), located in Mérida, Spain. The Phytophthora cinnamomi mycelium culture was obtained from a fresh plate using previous describe methodology [ 31 – 33 ]. The zoospore stock was obtained, and saved at − 80ºC until use, following the previous optimized protocol at [ 34 ]. Plasmid construction and Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain The Gateway system (Invitrogen, USA) was used to clone the Cast_Gnk2-like gene into the plasmid pK7WG2D [ 35 ] under the CaMV35S promoter, as described by [ 23 ]. The vector also includes the neomycin phosphotransferase ( NPTII ) selective gene, and the green fluorescent protein ( EGFP ) reporter gene, used for the selection of transformed embryos. The final vector, denominated as pK7WG2D-GIN (see Supplementary information 1), was transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 [ 36 ] by the freeze-thaw method [ 37 ] and used in the transformation experiments. Transformation of somatic embryos For transformation, the procedure described in [ 23 ] was applied, starting from explants that consisted of small clumps of 2 or 3 somatic embryos in globular or early-torpedo stage, isolated from two chestnut embryogenic lines. Agrobacterium strain and infection culture was prepared following the procedure described by [ 23 ]. For each embryogenic line, 120 explants were used (6 Petri dishes with 10 explants and the experiment was repeated twice) resulting in a total of 240 explants. Additionally, for each line 20 explants that were not infected and were cultured on proliferation medium without antibiotics (positive control) and with antibiotics (negative control). Explants were co-cultured for 5 days in darkness with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105pK7WG2D-GIN. Then, bacteria were eliminated by a wash with sterilized water supplemented with 300 mg/l cefotaxime for 30 min, and subsequently explants were transferred to selective proliferation medium with 100 mg/l kanamycin (Kan), 200 mg/l cefotaxime and 300 mg/l carbenicillin. Cultures were subcultured every two weeks for a total duration of 10 weeks. Kan-resistant explants were subsequently identified, and the percentage of Kan-resistant explants (defined as the proportion of initial explants exhibiting Kan tolerance) was calculated. Selection and establishment of transgenic lines Kan-resistant explants were isolated and sub-cultured on selective medium with 150 mg/l Kan to increase the selective pressure. The transformation efficiency (TE, defined as the percentage of initial explants that showed fluorescence [GFP+]) were determined after 14 weeks. Fluorescence was observed using a Leica M205 FA magnifier (Germany) equipped with a 200 W lamp and a specific fluorescence filter, with an excitation of 470/40x nm and an emission of 525/50 nm. Images were obtained with a Leica DSC7000T camera (Germany). A single somatic embryo at the cotyledonary stage was isolated from each GFP + explant. Each embryo was proliferated by secondary embryogenesis in selective medium to establish the different transgenic embryogenic lines. Twelve weeks after isolation Kan was removed and transgenic lines were multiplied on proliferation medium. Molecular analysis of transformed embryogenic lines Gene presence analysis The presence of the transgenes ( Cast_Gnk2-like gene and marker genes GFP and NPTII ) was confirmed by PCR amplification, as described in [ 20 ]. DNA was obtained from transformed and untransformed (WT) somatic embryos using the Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Once extracted, the DNA concentration was quantified using a Nanodrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). All amplification reactions were carried out in an MJ Mini thermal cycler (BioRad, USA), using a 25 µl reaction volume. The reaction consisted of 250–500 ng of genomic DNA, 0.5 µl of MgCl, 0.1 µl of Taq DNA Polymerase (Qiagen, Germany), 2.5 mM of dNTPs, and 15 µM of primers. The primer sequences, the amplification programs used, the fragment size generated are described in Supplementary information 2. The PCR amplification products were resolved in 1.5% (w/v) agarose gels. Gene copy number estimation The number of Cast_Gnk2-like copies inserted into embryogenic transformed lines was estimated using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), as described by [ 20 ]. DNA was extracted as outlined in the previous section, and three biological replicates per line were prepared. Specific oligos targeting NPTII were utilized in the reactions (see Supplementary Information 2). A standard curve was established following the method of [ 38 ], by mixing the plasmid used for transformation with non-transformed genomic DNA. Based on the genome size of C. sativa reported by [ 39 ], we calculated the amount of plasmid required to be mixed with non-transgenic DNA to simulate 1, 2, 5, and 10 copies of the transgene. The qPCR cycling included a subsequent step for melting curve analysis. The qPCR experiments incorporated no template controls, two technical replicates, and two repetitions. The copy number in each sample was estimated by making the correspondence between the C T values and the simulated copies of the transgene. Gene expression analysis The expression of Cast_Gnk2-like was analyzed using qPCR. Total RNA was extracted from non-transformed and transformed lines, utilizing somatic embryos at the early cotyledonary stage. The extraction followed a CTAB buffer protocol as outlined by [ 22 ]. Three biological replicates were taken from three distinct embryo clumps. The extracted RNA was treated with the TURBO DNA-free™ Kit (Invitrogen, USA) to remove any potential DNA contamination. RNA integrity was confirmed on 1% (w/v) agarose gels. Total RNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop™ One Microvolume UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Three µg of total RNA were used as the template for reverse transcription with RevertAid H Minus Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), primed with an oligo(dT) 23 . Specific primers for Cast_Gnk2-like are detailed in the Supplementary Information 2. For each reaction, 1.2 ng of cDNA were used in a 15 µL final volume, which included 7.5 µL of NZYSupreme qPCR Green Master Mix (2x) (NZYtech, Portugal). Each primer was used at a final concentration of 0.2 µM in a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad, USA). The qPCR reactions began with a denaturation step at 95ºC for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95ºC for 15 seconds and annealing for 30 seconds. Each set of reactions included a no-template control, two technical replicates and two repetitions. Dissociation curves were used to check for non-specific PCR products. To normalize the expression data, Elongation factor 1-alpha ( EF1α ) and Actin (D. Matthews, personal communication, August 24, 2023) were used as reference genes (Supplementary Information 2). Gene expression was calculated using the Hellemans method [ 40 ]. Plant regeneration of transgenic embryos Germination and plant regeneration was performed following the protocols defined by [ 41 ]. Cotyledonary embryos (>5 mm) were isolated and matured on maturation medium for further development. After 4 weeks, they were cold-stored at 4°C in dim light conditions for 2 months, before being cultured on germination medium. Plant conversion rates were generally low, but some embryos developed shoots. These shoots were multiplied via axillary budding proliferation and rooted following [ 23 ]. Briefly, elongated shoots were rooted in rooting medium defined as GD medium (Gresshoff and Doy, 1972; Duchefa, Netherlands) [ 42 ] with third-strength macronutrients supplemented with 25 mg/l IBA and 0.6% BD Agar Difco (w/v; Difco Laboratories, New Jersey, USA). Shoots were cultured in rooting medium for 48 h in darkness and later transferred to auxin-free rooting medium. Fluorescence was also tested on leaves from transgenic and non-transgenic plants (control) as described before for somatic embryos. In vitro tolerance assays Plant growth conditions Plants obtained as described above were transferred from agar to plastic sterile tubes containing 1 ml of sterilized water and they were incubated in an Aralab chamber (Lisbon, Portugal), at 50% humidity, temperature of 24°C during the day and 18°C during the night, with a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod and light intensity of 150 µE. m − 2 per second for all experiments. They were maintained in these conditions for a week for acclimation. Plant infection Plants were transferred to sterile DeWit® culture tubes (Sgl, Barcelona, Spain), containing 1 ml of sterile water and maintained for an additional three days for further acclimation. The plants were divided into two groups: a control group and an inoculated group. The inoculated plants were transferred to culture tubes with 1 ml of Pc zoospores at a final concentration of 10 7 zoospores/ml, while control plants were transferred to sterilized water, following a previous optimized protocol [ 34 ]. Disease evaluation symptoms The plant disease symptoms produced by Pc were considered following the standards approved for diagnostic protocols for regulated pests by EPPO council [ 43 ]. Those symptoms included principally root rot brown lesions followed by necrosis produced directly by the pathogen and secondary symptoms of decline producing leave chlorosis, high necrosis and death. Disease symptoms were followed for 7 days using a modified infection criteria described by [ 44 ] as followed: 0. No symptoms, 1. Leaf chlorosis and light necrosis on roots, 2. Apparent necrosis on leaves and light necrosis on roots, 3. High necrosis on leaves and roots, 4. Decomposed plants. Fresh weight (FW) was measured at 7 dpi, to calculate the fresh weight lost (FWL) Following the formula: Photographs of the explants were captured for assessing root necrosis (RN). The quantification of root infection and necrosis involved measuring the total length of the infected root and the segments showing necrosis at 7 dpi using the software ImageJ. The calculations were performed using the following formula: Necrotic lesions were measured by Trypan blue staining, performed as previously described [ 45 ]. Roots were stained with Trypan Blue solution for 20 min, rinsed with 100% ethanol over two days, and preserved in 60% glycerol until microscopic observation. At least six photos were quantified per root area and treatment. Image processing was performed using ImageJ Software and specific plug-in tools for measuring root necrosis as previously described in [ 46 ]. Statistical analysis The effect of genotype on genetic transformation data was analyzed using G-test (Fig. 1 ). Gene expression levels were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by a Dunn’s test for significance analysis of the transgenic lines compared to the untransformed genotypes at p-value < 0.05 (Fig. 4 ). Both analyses were performed using the SPSS 29.0 statistical package for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). In the tolerance assay, the Stat Graphics Centurion XVI.II program (Stat Point Technologies, Inc., Warrenton, VA, United States) was used for all data analysis related to plant fresh weight lost and root necrosis. ANOVA I and Duncan’s mean comparison test were performed for all experiments and t-tests with a significance level of 0.05% (Figs. 5 , 6 ). In ANOVA analyses, percentages were subjected to square-root transformation prior to analysis to normalize the data. In the case of non-homogeneous variance, a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was used. Results Genetic transformation of somatic embryos Kan-resistant somatic embryos were detected after 10 weeks in both lines (Fig. 1 ), but the two lines exhibited distinct behaviours during selection. After initiating culture in the selection medium, embryo explants turned brownish/blackish, particularly in lines CI-3. New growth was observed in CI-9 line within 4 weeks, with the number of Kan-resistant explants increasing over time. In contrast, CI-3 required at least 8 weeks to show new growth. After 10 weeks, Kan-resistant frequency was determined and it was found to be significantly influenced (p ≤ 0.001) by genotype of embryogenic lines (Fig. 1 ). As result of this, line CI-9 exhibited frequencies of 14.2%, whereas line CI-3 showed significantly lower values of 2.5%. Kan-resistant explants were isolated from both lines and subcultured for an additional four weeks on selective medium to promote embryogenic development and confirm kanamycin tolerance (Fig. 2 A,C). The transformation efficiency assessed based on the fluorescence of surviving explants (Fig. 2 B,D) was also genotype-dependent (Fig. 1 ). The TE was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.001) in CI-9 line (14.2%) than in the CI-3 line (2.5%) (Fig. 1 ). A total of 12 independent transformed lines were established. Successful embryo proliferation by secondary embryogenesis occurred in all established transgenic lines. After 6 weeks on selective medium, the number of secondary somatic embryos per explant was recorded to assess multiplication capacity (data not shown) and embryogenic lines with the highest multiplication ability were selected for further research: two transgenic lines from genotype CI-3 (CI-3-G1 and CI-3-G3) and four transgenic lines from genotype CI-9 (CI-9-G1, CI-9-G4, CI-9-G11, and CI-9-G12). Molecular analysis of transgenic lines The presence of transgenes ( Cast_Gnk2-like gene and marker genes GFP and NPTII ) in genomic DNA of transgenic embryogenic lines with high proliferation ability was confirmed by PCR (Fig. 3 ). PCR amplification was obtained in all chestnut transgenic lines tested, as well as in the plasmid (positive control), but not in the untransformed lines (negative control) (Fig. 3 ). The estimation of Cast_Gnk2-like copy number in embryogenic transformed lines was obtained through the amplification of an NPTII fragment, which is adjacent to Cast_Gnk2-like in the T-DNA (Supplementary information 1). All the transformed lines have the same number of transgenes in their genome, estimated as one copy (Table 1 ). As expected, non-transformed genotypes have zero copies of NPTII gene. Table 1 Estimated copy number in C. sativa somatic embryogenic lines transformed with Cast_Gnk2-like gene. 1 Values from the correlation between the quantity of plasmid and the number of copies in C. sativa , as described in Material and Methods. Line C T Mean C T Standard deviation Estimated copy number 1 CI-3-WT 32,71 2,32 0 CI-3-G1 23,95 1,03 1 CI-3-G3 23,37 0,48 1 CI-9-WT 30,22 0,51 0 CI-9-G1 22,35 0,64 1 CI-9-G4 22,47 0,46 1 CI-9-G11 23,65 0,73 1 CI-9-G12 23,74 1,40 1 Transgene expression in each transformed line was compared to the corresponding non-transformed genotypes in somatic embryos (Fig. 4 ). Cast_Gnk2-like oligos used in qPCR were designed from the coding sequence of C. crenata . Since C. sativa and C. crenata belong to the same genus, both endogenous and transgene transcripts may be amplified in the same reaction. However, Cast_Gnk2-like had CaMV35S as the promoter, which has a constitutive action, so an expression level in transformed lines higher than in non-transformed genotypes was expected. This was true and significant for the CI-3-G1, CI-9-G1, and CI-9-G11 transformed lines (Fig. 4 ), indicating that these lines exhibit overexpression of the putative resistance gene Cast_Gnk2-like . Plant regeneration from transgenic somatic embryos Regeneration occurred in all transgenic lines after two months of cold storage and subsequent transfer to germination medium, except CI-9-G4 (Table 2 ). Total regeneration (shoot and plant conversion) was higher in the non-transformed lines than in the transformed lines (Table 2 ). The frequency of plant regeneration was low across all transformed lines and in CI-9-WT, with percentages ranging from 4.2% to 16.6%. Only an acceptable plant regeneration percentage was observed in line CI-3-WT (37.5%). In all cases, regenerated shoots were multiplied via axillary shoot proliferation, enabling unlimited production of transgenic shoots for rooting and acclimatization. GFP expression was also detected in shoots and leaves isolated from transgenic plants (Fig. 2 E,F). As expected, no green fluorescence was observed in leaves isolated from non-transformed regenerated plants (Fig. 2 F). Table 2 Plant regeneration performance with only root development, only shoot development and conversion into plantlets (root and shoot development) of different chestnut transformed and untransformed lines (WT) after 8 weeks on germination medium. LINE ONLY ROOT ONLY SHOOT CONVERSION (root + shoot) TOTAL PLANT REGENERATION (%) RL (mm) (%) SL (mm) (%) % LINES CI-3 CI-3-WT 33.3 ± 6.5 14.7 ± 3.6 12.5 ± 5.7 7.5 ± 0.3 25.0 ± 11.3 37.5 CI-3-G1 20.8 ± 3.3 12.2 ± 1.6 8.3 ± 3.3 6.5 ± 0.8 4.2 ± 3.3 12.5 CI-3-G3 25.0 ± 5.7 10.8 ± 1.5 4.2 ± 3.3 7.0 ± 0.6 4.2 ± 3.3 8.4 LINES CI-9 CI-9-WT 20.8 ± 3.3 6.8 ± 0.4 8.3 ± 3.3 7.5 ± 0.6 8.3 ± 0.6 16.6 CI-9-G1 8.3 ± 3.3 7.5 ± 0.8 4.2 ± 3.3 7.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 4.2 CI-9-G4 8.3 ± 3.3 8.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 - 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 CI-9-G11 12.5 ± 5.7 7.8 ± 0.4 4.2 ± 3.3 8.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 4.2 CI-9-G12 16.7 ± 3.3 7.3 ± 0.9 4.2 ± 3.3 7.5 ± 0.0 4.2 ± 3.3 8.4 Each value represents the mean ± standard error of 3 replications with 8 somatic embryos in each replicate. RL, root length; SL, shoot length. 1 Total Plan Regeneration is obtained from the sum of only shoot rate and plant conversion rate. Disease ratio analysis of transformed plants The analysis of the overexpressing lines CI-3-G1, Cl-3-G3, CI-9-G1 and Cl-9-G11, transformed with Cast_Gnk2-like gene under CaMV35S promoter control, produced lines with no apparent differences from non-transformed plants n terms of plant growth and development, allowing the subsequent analysis of resistance to Pc. The analysis revealed less statistically significant root necrosis caused by Pc in transformed lines when compared to the untransformed controls, although differences into levels of disease symptoms were observed (Figs. 5 and 6 ). Differences in the progression of symptoms among CI-3-WT, CI-3-G1, and CI-3-G3 lines, such as chlorosis and necrosis, are visible in Fig. 5 A–C. The root necrosis induced by the oomycete was evident in CI-3-WT lines and was confirmed by the trypan blue staining of root death cells, being lower in transformed plants (Fig. 5 D–F). The symptoms observed in roots were quantified by disease ratio, which is shown at Fig. 5 G. This data reveals a significantly lower disease severity and root necrosis than CI-3-WT (Fig. 5 H). Although transformed lines Cl-3-G1 and Cl-3-G3 exhibited an apparently lower fresh weight loss compared to the WT, the differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 5 I). Considering all the data, CI-3-G3 showed higher tolerance than G1, although the differences were not statistically significant. In Fig. 6 a similar analysis of the transformed lines CI-9-G1 and CI-9-G11, with the background Cl-9-WT, is shown. The results illustrate that the symptoms in both Cast_Gnk2-like overexpressing lines in response to Pc after 7 days were less severe relatively to the WT plants. Actually, lines CI-9-G1 and CI-9-G11 showed less root necrosis and lower disease indexes (Fig. 6 G-H), especially line CI-9-G11 (Fig. 6 A-C). Those results were in line with the levels of cell death on roots confirmed by trypan blue staining (Fig. 6 D-F). Line CI9-G1 showed much less differences with the WT, however still significant (Fig. 6 H). The differences in fresh weight loss between line CI-9-G11 and the WT were not statistically significant. By contrast, line CI-9-G1 presented a higher fresh weight loss compared to the WT, suggesting a possible pleiotropic effect in this line produced by the insertion (Fig. 6 I). Overall, CI-3-G3 and CI-9-G11 consistently demonstrated reductions in root necrosis upon Pc infection compared with WT, pointing that overexpression of the Gnk2 homolog ( Cast_Gnk2 -like) has a positive effect in the defense to the pathogen. Variability in resistance among the different lines indicates that further molecular analyses are needed to fully understand the observed differences. Discussion Pathogens as fungi, oomycetes, bacteria, and viruses compromise plant health and survival leading to significant economic losses [ 47 ]. Among these, ink disease, primarily caused by the oomycete Pc, has severely affected chestnut populations for many years. Since chemical treatments with fungicides and pesticides have proven largely ineffective, developing genotypes tolerant to the pathogen represents the most promising strategy. Biotechnological tools such as somatic embryogenesis and genetic transformation provide effective approaches for developing disease-tolerant genotypes especially in woody plants and for gaining insight into the mechanisms by which plants defend themselves against pathogens [ 48 ]. The overexpression of antifungal proteins represents an interesting strategy to enhance plant tolerance against fungal diseases, with potential applications in agricultural biotechnology [ 49 ]. In this study, the overexpression of the Cast_Gnk2-like , homologous to an antifungal protein, was obtained in the two embryogenic lines tested, although the transformation rates were influenced by the genotype. The effect of genotype on transformation frequencies has also been reported in other woody species, such as American chestnut [ 50 ] and pedunculate oak [ 51 ], emphasizing the importance of genetic background in determining the success of genetic transformation procedures. The transformation rates in chestnut were higher than those previously mentioned in holm oak [ 20 ] and cork oak [ 22 ] using the same construct and the same Agrobacterium strain. The use of the GFP as a marker gene enabled direct visual selection of transformed embryos, facilitating their identification. Although GFP has been reported to exhibit cytotoxic effects in some plant cells [ 52 ], evidence obtained in the present paper and other species like pear [ 53 ], rubber tree [ 54 ], holm oak [ 55 ], and cork oak [ 56 ] indicate that GFP does not negatively affect embryo development or plant regeneration. The conversion of somatic embryos into plants remains a major limiting factor in most embryogenic systems of woody species [ 57 ]. This limitation is even more pronounced in transgenic somatic embryos [ 27 , 58 , 59 ], likely due to extended culture in kanamycin-containing media [ 60 ]. Although conversion frequencies in European chestnut were low, the resulting shoots could be excised and easily multiplied through axillary bud proliferation and were subsequently rooted, thus producing viable plants for tolerance assays. A similar approach was also successfully used in cork oak for the regeneration of plants from somatic embryos overexpressing the CsTL1 gene, which encodes a thaumatin-like protein [ 56 ]. The number of Cast_Gnk2-like gene copies in transgenic lines was estimated to be one. Low copies of the chestnut thaumatin-like protein gene (one and two) were also obtained with C. sativa somatic embryos in our previous study [ 27 ]. One copy of the inserted gene is important to avoid transgene silencing. Despite the single number of Cast_Gnk2-like copies, the expression level was notably different among transgenic lines. Besides copy number, other factors may influence transgene expression, such as the position and integration of the T-DNA in the genome, and the use of the CaMV35S promoter [ 61 ]. The promoter was used to confer the overexpression of Cast_Gnk2-like gene, which was essential to proceed with the gene functional analysis. Expression levels of overexpressed genes considerably differ among different transgenic lines, even when the same gene and promoter are used. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate multiple lines to select those with adequate expression levels, as only lines surpassing a minimum threshold typically exhibit the desired phenotype, such as enhanced pathogen resistance. The tolerance of the lines overexpressing the Cast_Gnk2-like gene was evaluated in regenerated plants through an in vitro assay. In vitro testing techniques represent a valuable tool for the identification and selection of cultivars with tolerance or resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses [ 62 , 63 ]. This approach offers significant advantages over field trials, as it allows for faster, more cost-effective evaluations under controlled conditions, thereby reducing the time, space, and resources required, as well as the avoidance of pathogen escape. Moreover, the controlled laboratory environment enables the uniform reproduction of specific stress conditions, improving both the accuracy and reproducibility of the results. In the present study, in vitro assays were performed using previously isolated stocks of virulent zoospores of Pc, using an optimized protocol [ 34 ], enabling a more precise and reliable assessment of plant tolerance compared to previous methods that relied on mycelium plugs. The in vitro tests revealed that the insertions introduced into the transformed plants with Cast_Gnk2-like gene, improved the tolerance to Pc when compared to the non-transformed. However, the lines CI-3-G3 and CI-9_G11 were significantly more tolerant than CI-3-G1 and CI-9-G1. These less tolerant lines exhibited Cast_Gnk2-like fold change over 30-fold higher, whereas the more tolerant showed lower overexpression. This suggests that Cast_Gnk2-like may induce trade-off during the progression of infection, potentially compromising the efficiency of the plant’s immuneresponses. In some cases, such as in line CI-9-G1, the transformation may have triggered pleiotropic effects that altered plant development. For example, the lower fresh weight loss observed in this line during infection could be a consequence of a slight increase in shoot growth. Rapid shoot growth or accelerated flowering shortly after pathogen exposure is often observed in plants attempting to survive stress. Further molecular analysis of the transgene insertion is therefore required to confirm whether these developmental changes are linked to the observed variation in tolerance. In this study, the enhanced tolerance to Pc observed in lines CI-3-G3 and CI-9-G11 confirms the relevance of Cast_Gnk2 -like gene overexpression as part of a strategy for plant protection against the pathogen. Similarly, overexpression of Cast_Gnk2 -like has been successfully achieved in both holm oak and cork oak through genetic transformation, leading to increased tolerance to Pc [ 20 , 22 ]. In these species, transformed plants exhibited significantly improved survival rates and reduced root necrosis. Furthermore, overexpression of GNK2-1 from Ginkgo biloba seed kernels in cucumber also demonstrated a stable and significant inhibitory effect on Fusarium oxysporum growth [ 64 ]. The antifungal activity of Gnk2 is attributed to the presence of the DUF26 domain, characteristic of cysteine-rich lectins and defense-related proteins. This domain confers lectin activity, allowing the protein to bind to mannose and mannan residues in fungal cell walls, thereby disrupting their integrity and inhibiting fungal growth [ 29 ]. It might be plausible that Cast_Gnk2-like gene contributes to the synergistic interaction between lectins and pectins within the plant root defense machinery against Pc. Lectins and pectin work together in a multi-layered defense system, where lectins act as sensors and pectin serves as a target or trigger for immune responses against pathogens in the root environment [ 65 ]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that Pc zoospores show pectinase activity during penetration of plant roots [ 46 ]. One might speculate that the effect of Cast_Gnk2-like might not only be a direct antimicrobial effect on Pc, but also improve the pectin barrier and lectin activity in roots, improving root protection against the penetration of zoospores. This hypothesis has been previously suggested for another antimicrobial proteins [ 66 ], but would require further molecular analysis for the case of Gnk2. Consequently, the overexpression of soluble lectins or lectin receptor kinases may reduce pathogen growth and may activate defense responses such as the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), expression of pathogenesis-related genes, and the strengthening of cell walls, thereby enhancing the plant’s overall resistance to infections [ 67 – 69 ]. The mechanism seems very similar to that of glucanases or chitinases, which degrade key structural components of the pathogen’s cell wall. Taken together, these studies reinforce the idea that weakening the structural integrity of the pathogen’s cell wall, whether through molecular binding or enzymatic degradation, is an effective strategy to prevent infection. In turn, a broader theory is supported that a significant part of plant tolerance or resistance relies on the ability to recognize and target essential cell wall components of the pathogen, thereby blocking its colonization and progression. Overall, the studies concur that weakening the pathogen’s cell wall, whether by binding or enzymatic degradation, constitutes an effective means of preventing infection. Conclusions The overexpression of the Cast_Gnk2-like gene in European chestnut significantly enhancedtolerance to Phytophthora cinnamomi . These findings support the use of antifungal protein overexpression as an effective strategy to improve resistance to fungal pathogens, and position Cast_Gnk2-like gene as a promising candidate for reinforcing oomycete resistance in genetically improved crops. The use of an endogenous gene from chestnut ensures better physiological compatibility, stable expression, and integration into native defense pathways. Furthermore, since Cast_Gnk2-like originates from the same genus, future development of cisgenic lines via genome editing, may be feasible, potentially circumventing some of the regulatory constrains associated with transgenic approaches. In addition to improved pathogen tolerance, genome editing offers the advantage of precise genetic modifications without the need for exogenous promoters or reporter genes, which can sometimes interfere with normal plant development. Finally, although the tolerance results are promising, it is necessary to confirm these data through ex vitro tolerance assays. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests Funding At MBG-CSIC, work was partly supported by Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI, Spain) through the projects PID2020-112627RB-C33 (AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 ) and PID2024-156422OB-C33. At BioISI, work was supported by UIDB/04046/2020 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/ 04046/ 2020) and UIDP/04046/2020 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/ 04046/ 2020) Centre grants from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal. At UPM, research was partially funded by EU FEADER funds through the project “Breeding and conservation program for holm and cork oak for tolerance to oak decline” leaded by the Spanish Ministry for Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge (MITECO, Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación). At INIAV this work was supported by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P., through project reference UID/00239/2025. Portugal. SS is being funded by an FCT contract in the project 2022.06990. PTDC (DOI: 10.54499/2022.06990.PTDC ). PP was funded by a FPU (Formación de Profesorado Universitario) grant from Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MICIN, Spain) (FPU23/00921). LdC PhD contract was funded partially by Fundación Conde Del Valle Salazar (UPM), Spain. Author Contribution SS, MTM, EP, LdC, PP, SV, and MF investigated and performed data analyses. EC designed and managed the project. SS, RC, MB, RM and EC wrote the manuscript. All authors revised, read, and approved the manuscript. Acknowledgments We would like to thank Fátima Mosteiro, Cristina Buceta and Sol Campañó for their valuable technical assistance. Data Availability The protein sequence analyzed in this study (Cast_Gnk2-like) is publicly available in the NCBI Protein database and in the UniProt database under accession number P0DO63. References Conedera M, Tinner W, Krebs P, de Rigo D, Caudullo G. Castanea sativa in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San–Miguel–Ayanz J, De Rigo D, Caudullo G, Durrant T, Mauri A, editors. European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Luxembourg: Publ. Off. EU; 2016. pp. 78–9. Roces–Díaz JV, Díaz–Varela ER, Barrio–Anta M, Álvarez–Álvarez P. Sweet chestnut agroforestry systems in north–western Spain: classification, spatial distribution and an ecosystem services assessment. For Syst. 2018;27(1):e03. 10.5424/fs/2018271–11973 . Council of the European Communities. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official J Eur Communities L 206 (22 July 1992):7–50. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31992L0043 Santos MJ, Pinto T, Vilela A. Sweet chestnut ( Castanea sativa Mill.) nutritional and phenolic composition interactions with chestnut flavour physiology. Foods. 2022;11:4052. 10.3390/foods11244052 . Meleti Ε, Kossyva V, Maisoglou I, Vrontaki M, Manouras V, Tzereme A, Alexandraki M, Koureas M, Malissiova E, Manouras A. The nutritional benefits and sustainable by–product utilization of chestnuts: a comprehensive review. Agriculture. 2024;14:2262. 10.3390/agriculture14122262 . Gomes-Laranjo J, Pereira-Lorenzo S, Marino G. The world sector of chestnut. Acta Hortic. 2024;1400:1–14. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2024.1400.1 . Temperán S, Lorenzo JM, Domínguez B, Franco I, Carballo J. Carcass and meat quality traits of Celta heavy pigs. Effect of the inclusion of chestnuts in the finishing diet. Span J Agric Res. 2014;12(3):494–504. Bounous G. The chestnut: a multipurpose resource for the new millennium. Acta Hortic. 2005;693:33–40. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.693.1 . Fernandes P, Colavolpe MB, Serrazina S, Costa RL. European and American chestnuts: an overview of the main threats and control efforts. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:951844. 10.3389/fpls.2022.951844 . Vieitez AM, Vieitez ML, Vieitez E. Chestnut ( Castanea spp). In: Bajaj YPS, editor. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, Vol. 1: Trees I. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer–; 1986. pp. 393–414. Costa R, Santos C, Tavares F, Machado H, Gomes–Laranjo J, Kubisiak T et al. Mapping and transcriptomic approaches implemented for understanding disease resistance to Phytophthora cinammomi in Castanea sp. BMC Proc. 2011;5:O18. 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-O18 Santos C, Machado H, Correia I, Gomes F, Gomes–Laranjo J, Costa R. Phenotyping Castanea hybrids for Phytophthora cinnamomi resistance. Plant Pathol. 2015;64:901–10. 10.1111/ppa.12313 . Fernandes P, Tedesco S, da Silva IV, Santos C, Machado H, Costa RL. A new clonal propagation protocol develops quality root systems in chestnut. Forests. 2020;11:826. 10.3390/F11080826 . Fernandes P, Amaral A, Colavolpe B, Pereira A, Costa R. Avaliação agronómica de genótipos de castanheiro selecionados do programa de melhoramento genético para a resistência à tinta. Vida Rural. 2021a;76–82. Alcaide F, Solla A, Cherubini M, Mattioni C, Cuenca B, Camisón Á, Martín MA. Adaptive evolution of chestnut forests to the impact of ink disease in Spain. J Syst Evol. 2020;58(4):504–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/JSE.12551/SUPPINFO . Serrazina S, Santos C, Machado H, Pesquita C, Vicentini R, Pais MS, et al. Castanea root transcriptome in response to Phytophthora cinnamomi challenge. Tree Genet Genomes. 2015;11:6. 10.1007/s11295-014-0829-7 . Santos C, Nelson CD, Zhebentyayeva T, Machado H, Gomes–Laranjo J, Costa RL. First interspecific genetic linkage map for Castanea sativa × Castanea crenata revealed QTLs for resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi . PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0184381. 10.1371/journal.pone.0184381 . Fernandes P, Machado H, do Céu Silva M, Costa RL. A histopathological study reveals new insights into responses of chestnut ( Castanea spp.) to root infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi . Phytopathology. 2021b;111:345–55. 10. 1094/PHYTO–04–20–0115–R. Fernandes P, Pimentel D, Ramiro RS, Silva MdC, Fevereiro P, Costa RL. Dual transcriptomic analysis reveals early induced Castanea defense–related genes and Phytophthora cinnamomi effectors. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1439380. 10.3389/fpls.2024.1439380 . Serrazina S, Martínez MT, Cano V, Malhó R, Costa RL, Corredoira E. Genetic transformation of Quercus ilex somatic embryos with a Gnk2–like protein that reveals a putative anti–oomycete action. Plants. 2022;11:304. 10.3390/plants11030304 . Colavolpe MB, Vaz Dias F, Serrazina S, Malhó R, Lourenço Costa R. Castanea crenata Ginkbilobin–2–like recombinant protein reveals potential as an antimicrobial against Phytophthora cinnamomi , the causal agent of ink disease in European chestnut. Forests. 2023;14:785. 10.3390/f14040785 . Serrazina S, Martínez M, Soudani S, et al. Overexpression of Ginkbilobin–2 homologous domain gene improves tolerance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in somatic embryos of Quercus suber . Sci Rep. 2024;14:19357. 10.1038/s41598-024-70272-2 . Corredoira E, Valladares S, Vieitez AM, Ballester A, Chestnut. European ( Castanea sativa ). In: Wang K, editor. Methods in Molecular Biology: Agrobacterium Protocols. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer–; 2015. pp. 163–76. 10.1007/978-1-4939-1658-0_14 . Seabra RC, Pais MS. Genetic transformation of European chestnut. Plant Cell Rep. 1998;17:177–82. Corredoira E, Montenegro D, San–José MC, Vieitez AM, Ballester A. Agrobacterium –mediated transformation of European chestnut embryogenic cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 2004;23(5):311–8. 10.1007/s00299-004-0804-0 . Corredoira E, San–José MC, Vieitez AM, Ballester A. Improving genetic transformation of European chestnut and cryopreservation of transgenic lines. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2007;91:281–8. Corredoira E, Valladares S, Allona I, Aragoncillo C, Vieitez AM, Ballester A. Genetic transformation of European chestnut somatic embryos with a native thaumatin–like protein ( CsTL1 ) gene isolated from Castanea sativa seeds. Tree Physiol. 2012;32(11):1389–402. 10.1093/treephys/tps098 . Corredoira E, San José MC, Vieitez AM, Allona I, Aragoncillo C, Ballester A. Agrobacterium–mediated transformation of European chestnut somatic embryos with a Castanea sativa (Mill.) endochitinase gene. New For. 2016;47:669–84. 10.1007/s11056-016-9537-5 . Miyakawa T, Hatano K, Miyauchi Y, Suwa Y, Sawano Y, Tanokura M. Secreted protein with plant–specific cysteine–rich motif functions as a mannose–binding lectin that exhibits antifungal activity. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(2):766–78. 10.1104/pp.114.242636 . Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant. 1962;15:473–97. Chen DW, Zentmyer GA. Production of sporangia by Phytophthora cinnamomi in axenic culture. Mycologia. 1970;62(2):397–402. Byrt PN, Holland AA. Infection of axenic Eucalyptus seedlings with Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores. Aust J Bot. 1978;26(2):169–76. Byrt P, Grant BR. Some conditions governing zoospore production in axenic cultures of Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands. Aust J Bot. 1979;27(2):103–15. Del Castillo–González L, Soudani S, De La Cruz–Gómez N, Manzanera JA, Berrocal–Lobo M. An improved method to study Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands zoospores interactions with host. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):508. 10.1186/s12870-024-05205-2 . Karimi M, Inzé D, Depicker A. GATEWAY™ vectors for Agrobacterium -mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:193–5. 10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02251-3 . Hood EE, Gelvin SB, Melchers LS, Hoekema A. New Agrobacterium helper plasmids for gene transfer to plants. Transgenic Res. 1993;2:208–18. 10.1007/BF01977351 . Xu R, Li QQ, Protocol. Streamline cloning of genes into binary vectors in Agrobacterium via the Gateway–TOPO vector system. Plant Methods. 2008;4:4. 10.1186/1746-4811-4-4 . Song P, Cai C, Skokut M, Kosegi BD, Petolino JF. Quantitative real–time PCR as a screening tool for estimating transgene copy number in WHISKERS™–derived transgenic maize. Plant Cell Rep. 2002;20:948–54. 10.1007/s00299-001-0432-x . Bianco L, Fontana P, Marchesini A, et al. The de novo, chromosome–level genome assembly of the sweet chestnut ( Castanea sativa Mill.) cv. Marrone Di Chiusa Pesio. BMC Genom Data. 2024;25:64. 10.1186/s12863-024-01245-7 . Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F, Vandesompele J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real–time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol. 2007;8(2):R19. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19 . Corredoira E, Valladares S, Vieitez AM, Ballester A. Improved germination of somatic embryos and plant recovery of European chestnut. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2008;44, 307–315 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-008-9105-6 Gresshoff PM, Doy CH. Development and differentiation of haploid Lycopersicon esculentum . Planta. 1972;107:161–70. EPPO Bulletin. EPPO standards diagnostic protocols for regulated pests. 2004;34:155–7. Soudani S, Poza-Carrión C, De la Cruz Gómez N, González-Coloma A, Andrés MF, Berrocal-Lobo M. Essential Oils Prime Epigenetic and Metabolomic Changes in Tomato Defense Against Fusarium oxysporum . Front Plant Sci. 2002;13:804104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.80410 . Fernández–Bautista N, Domínguez–Núñez JA, Moreno MMC, Berrocal–Lobo M. Plant tissue trypan blue staining during phytopathogen infection. Bio–protocol. 2016;6(24):e2078–2078. Del Castillo–González L, Poza–Carrión C, Soudani S, De la Cruz–Gómez N, Andrés MF, González–Coloma A, Manzanera JA, Berrocal–Lobo M. The first molecular characterization of Solanum lycopersicum – Phytophthora cinnamomi phytopathosystem: the essential role of pectin. Phytopathology. 2025;115(6):618–33. Ali S, Ganai BA, Kamili AN, Bhat AA, Mir ZA, Bhat JA, Tyagi A, Islam ST, Mushtaq M, Yadav P, Rawat S, Grover A. Pathogenesis–related proteins and peptides as promising tools for engineering plants with multiple stress tolerance. Microbiol Res. 2018;212–213:29–37. 10.1016/j.micres.2018.04.008 . Dąbrowska E. Genetic engineering for enhanced disease resistance in plants. J Agric Sci Bot. 2024;8(4):249. Chiu T, Poucet T, Li Y. The potential of plant proteins as antifungal agents for agricultural applications. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2022;7(4):1075–83. 10.1016/j.synbio.2022.06.009 . Andrade GM, Nairn CJ, Le HT, Merkle SA. Sexually mature transgenic American chestnut trees via embryogenic suspension–based transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 2009;28:1385–97. Mallón R, Valladares S, Corredoira E, Vieitez AM, Vidal N. Overexpression of the chestnut CsTL1 gene coding for a thaumatin–like protein in somatic embryos of Quercus robur . Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014;116:141–51. 10.1007/s11240-013-0390-3 . Haseloff J, Amos B. GFP in plants. Trends Genet. 1995;11:328–9. Yancheva SD, Shlizerman LA, Golubowicz S, Yabloviz Z, Perl A, Hanania U, Flaishman MA. The use of green fluorescent protein (GFP) improves Agrobacterium –mediated transformation of ‘Spadona’ pear ( Pyrus communis L). Plant Cell Rep. 2006;25:183–9. Leclercq J, Lardet L, Martin F, Chapuset T, Oliver G, Montoro P. The green fluorescent protein as an efficient selection marker for Agrobacterium tumefaciens –mediated transformation in Hevea brasiliensis (Müll. Arg). Plant Cell Rep. 2010;29:513–22. Cano V, Martínez MT, San José MC, Couselo JL, Varas E, Bouza–Morcillo L, Toribio M, Corredoira E. Regeneration of transgenic plants by Agrobacterium –mediated transformation of Quercus ilex L. somatic embryos with the gene CsTL1 . New For. 2020;51:1003–1021. 10.1007/s11056-020-09771-9 Cano V, Martínez MT, Couselo JL, Varas E, Vieitez FJ, Corredoira E. Efficient transformation of somatic embryos and regeneration of cork oak plantlets with a gene ( CsTL1 ) encoding a chestnut thaumatin–like protein. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1757. 10.3390/ijms22041757 . Corredoira E, Merkle SA, Martínez MT, Toribio M, Canhoto JM, Correia SI, Ballester A, Vieitez AM. Non–zygotic embryogenesis in hardwood species. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2019;38:29–97. 10.1080/07352689.2018.1551122 . Urtubia C, Devia J, Castro A, Zamora P, Aguirre C, Tapia E, Barba P, Dell’Orto P, Moynihan MR, Petri C, et al. Agrobacterium–mediated genetic transformation of Prunus salicina . Plant Cell Rep. 2008;27:1333–40. 10.1007/s00299-008-0559-0 . Palomo–Ríos E, Cerezo S, Mercado JA, Pliego–Alfaro F. Agrobacterium–mediated transformation of avocado ( Persea americana Mill.) somatic embryos with fluorescent marker genes and optimization of transgenic plant recovery. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016;128:447–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-1122-2 . Maynard CA, Powell WA, Polin-McGuigan LD, Viéitez AM, Ballester A, Corredoira E, Merkle SA. Chestnut. Compendium of Transgenic Crop Plants. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley; 2008. pp. 169–92. De Buck S, De Paepe A, Depicker A. Transgene expression in plants, control of. In: Christou P, et al. editors. Sustainable Food Production. Springer; 2013. pp. 1570–93. 10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_412 . Pérez–Jiménez M, Pérez–Tornero O. In in Vitro plant evaluation trial: reliability test of salinity assays in Citrus plants. Plants. 2020;9(10):1352. Wijerathna–Yapa A, Hiti–Bandaralage J. Tissue culture–A sustainable approach to explore plant stresses. Life (Basel). 2023;13(3):780. 10.3390/life13030780 . Liu J, Tian H, Wang Y, Guo A. Overexpression of a novel antifungal protein gene GNK2–1 results in elevated resistance of transgenic cucumber to Fusarium oxysporum. Chin Bull Bot. 2010;45:411–8. Van Holle S, Van Damme EJM. Signaling through plant lectins: modulation of plant immunity and beyond. Biochem Soc Trans. 2018;46(2):217–33. 10.1042/BST20170371 . Farvardin A, González–Hernández AI, Llorens E, Camañes G, Scalschi L, Vicedo B. The dual role of antimicrobial proteins and peptides: exploring their direct impact and plant defense–enhancing abilities. Plants. 2024;13:2059. 10.3390/plants13152059 . Hwang IS, Hwang BK. The pepper mannose–binding lectin gene CaMBL1 is required to regulate cell death and defense responses to microbial pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2011;155(1):447–63. 10.1104/pp.110.164848 . Yue ZL, Tian ZJ, Zhang JW, Zhang SW, Li YD, Wu ZM. Overexpression of Lectin Receptor–Like Kinase 1 in tomato confers resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis–lycopersici. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:836269. 10.3389/fpls.2022.836269 . Peng X, Li Y, Xu J, Zeng Y, Li K, Guo X, Zhang Z, Tang X, Wang M. Overexpression of the lectin receptor–like kinase gene OsLecRK–S.7 inhibits plant growth and enhances disease resistance in rice. Plant Sci. 2025;356:112517. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2025.112517 . Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files Table1.Cscopynumber.docx Table2Plantregeneration.docx Supplementaryinformation1Construction.pdf Supplementaryinformation2Primersrelation.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 09 Jan, 2026 Read the published version in BMC Genomics → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 15 Dec, 2025 Reviews received at journal 15 Dec, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 24 Nov, 2025 Reviews received at journal 19 Nov, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 06 Nov, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 06 Nov, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 05 Nov, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 04 Nov, 2025 First submitted to journal 04 Nov, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7973831","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":545827842,"identity":"02f8dd52-c3aa-400c-8be7-047e8f143ba2","order_by":0,"name":"Susana Serrazina","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Lisbon","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Susana","middleName":"","lastName":"Serrazina","suffix":""},{"id":545827843,"identity":"52397120-0601-496b-8f3e-7ec324c33dec","order_by":1,"name":"María Teresa Martínez","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Misión Biológica de Galicia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"María","middleName":"Teresa","lastName":"Martínez","suffix":""},{"id":545827844,"identity":"ac8eb53a-2ac5-47c9-a449-813605007122","order_by":2,"name":"Silvia Valladares","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Misión Biológica de Galicia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Silvia","middleName":"","lastName":"Valladares","suffix":""},{"id":545827845,"identity":"b952f54d-5c9c-403c-b0e7-7ef60b813336","order_by":3,"name":"Lucía Del Castillo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Technical University of Madrid","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lucía","middleName":"Del","lastName":"Castillo","suffix":""},{"id":545827846,"identity":"a903d513-f0c5-471e-a57e-db496f5c3c5b","order_by":4,"name":"Marcelo Francisco","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Lisbon","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Marcelo","middleName":"","lastName":"Francisco","suffix":""},{"id":545827847,"identity":"58450383-6974-4ba6-966d-dfb6df358da0","order_by":5,"name":"Marta Berrocal-Lobo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Technical University of Madrid","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Marta","middleName":"","lastName":"Berrocal-Lobo","suffix":""},{"id":545827848,"identity":"2e13e5ad-d68e-4283-9609-547c1c06bb24","order_by":6,"name":"Eduardo Piñas","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Misión Biológica de Galicia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Eduardo","middleName":"","lastName":"Piñas","suffix":""},{"id":545827849,"identity":"30ab6795-a6ca-4f0a-b7c0-40fa1c90a7b9","order_by":7,"name":"Pablo Piñeiro","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Misión Biológica de Galicia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Pablo","middleName":"","lastName":"Piñeiro","suffix":""},{"id":545827850,"identity":"6ec739a1-41aa-4012-b174-1af16051cdbb","order_by":8,"name":"Rui Malhó","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Lisbon","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rui","middleName":"","lastName":"Malhó","suffix":""},{"id":545827851,"identity":"6c5553e3-03cb-43dd-9b0c-abe0f50475ab","order_by":9,"name":"Rita Costa","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rita","middleName":"","lastName":"Costa","suffix":""},{"id":545827852,"identity":"1c2e9c1d-96f8-4430-881d-f3aee94df197","order_by":10,"name":"Elena Corredoira","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Misión Biológica de Galicia","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Elena","middleName":"","lastName":"Corredoira","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-10-28 21:23:21","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7973831/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7973831/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-12485-x","type":"published","date":"2026-01-09T15:58:10+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":96073187,"identity":"118f41cb-cf15-4ff8-ad7c-68ced938576b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":88518,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ChestnutGINresponsetoBMCGreview.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/ce69f42def29f0c9f0593926.docx"},{"id":96246575,"identity":"a81ebe5c-ba6f-4270-8c7e-6dcbea6d7947","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:26:17","extension":"tif","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":10341466,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figura5.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/64a13b0388272154d3ee85c4.tif"},{"id":96249619,"identity":"433f8758-00d4-462c-8979-9a1cc363f2e3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:35:44","extension":"tif","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":13135490,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figura6.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/39f61b9b853fecc0316baf82.tif"},{"id":96073192,"identity":"8802fade-6c71-434b-85c2-06a1a312bcd9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"docx","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":15662,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figure1.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/11011ab0bfa1c6616f033a8d.docx"},{"id":96073193,"identity":"e3479a16-c8bd-43b4-92cf-34916b8975a5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"docx","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":16609,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Table1.Cscopynumber.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/66687cd5d3cadea4ad8c257b.docx"},{"id":96248484,"identity":"03adc752-153d-4926-b5d2-7a4d6732c6e2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:28:30","extension":"tif","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":495430,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figure2.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/2590e07d3d7950147f6cac50.tif"},{"id":96073197,"identity":"421badf9-a725-4b75-b5cf-be3123dc50f1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"docx","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":14544,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Table2Plantregeneration.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/cbfb83489796eb03266cf3cf.docx"},{"id":96073207,"identity":"5599dbde-1328-4301-8540-797feff9ff65","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"tif","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":74368,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figure3.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/9c177dfc15d059d9d4533770.tif"},{"id":96073201,"identity":"1292796c-c507-4298-90be-0e3d9ec79f0a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"docx","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":48646,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figure4.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/c1a9e4f9541ab263fcb4a1b2.docx"},{"id":96246620,"identity":"99258d68-b1f2-45d1-83cc-9ec54ff1bd4a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:26:22","extension":"json","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":10837,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"b0dcce71210d4260a2ab54b02b9f4c52.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/de29e3893c65634e9eb8da04.json"},{"id":96073198,"identity":"0d15e043-8b45-4409-bdab-19a14edc747b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"pdf","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":24358,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Supplementaryinformation1Construction.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/734013dd6b4c3143e85d2ff4.pdf"},{"id":96073205,"identity":"9de1386d-2bc4-4982-a2ae-7235cf854832","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"pdf","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":346794,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Supplementaryinformation2Primersrelation.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/b83b9bdda0cd86b0a1ded077.pdf"},{"id":96073211,"identity":"d4cad7cf-b20d-4e1e-ae72-3139b65830ac","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"xml","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":188956,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"b0dcce71210d4260a2ab54b02b9f4c521enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/e979131efe02218eb3d142f8.xml"},{"id":96248266,"identity":"6bfb3a41-1a24-403f-8e77-a2df3ee8f162","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:28:15","extension":"tif","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":10341466,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figura5.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/d5ee61af6619dc99a8ee8030.tif"},{"id":96248005,"identity":"9a5f6114-ca09-4b42-8170-e177ab65e2ea","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:27:57","extension":"tif","order_by":14,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":13135490,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figura6.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/5973f8730fe5cb00bf6a61ef.tif"},{"id":96247869,"identity":"54a949f8-7b75-4934-b298-c85700a8d5a7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:27:48","extension":"tif","order_by":15,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":495430,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figure2.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/397c93717e12c5a5057a5ac5.tif"},{"id":96247943,"identity":"b6a6f4e4-7df3-4e9c-9229-f8c869ec80c1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:27:53","extension":"tif","order_by":16,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":74368,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figure3.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/73a8ef7251ada80ac4e4c3c9.tif"},{"id":96073210,"identity":"2f32315c-e0c2-4905-a000-af26b087c503","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"png","order_by":18,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":15292,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/e7cbb2e21b9b8d2235b54b48.png"},{"id":96073203,"identity":"350c760f-d1d0-4da1-a23e-f31bde5c0a52","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"png","order_by":19,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":12437,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/732f79447e20e161435deeb5.png"},{"id":96248987,"identity":"bdda8c3b-8fc9-4850-8b98-d6bac5d0a0fb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:29:51","extension":"jpeg","order_by":20,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":243858,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/e8b4cf76c6f5c554e7b912e8.jpeg"},{"id":96073217,"identity":"69f3016d-811a-4276-a51e-e3080eaf5e1f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:38","extension":"png","order_by":21,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":308457,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"OnlineFigura5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/932481ccf59a852c9363547d.png"},{"id":96073212,"identity":"1a5d79fc-c09e-4281-81d6-ed9448a79799","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"png","order_by":22,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":323577,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"OnlineFigura6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/2ad79bd6575e11e39c328dc7.png"},{"id":96247347,"identity":"3d10488d-60cc-4a6c-ae41-1d51b67932fb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:27:25","extension":"png","order_by":23,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":38717,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"OnlineFigure2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/849d292f95d2f40282159f50.png"},{"id":96073219,"identity":"d376cf80-21f8-41c6-8bb0-c1fdf675522c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:38","extension":"png","order_by":24,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":27973,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"OnlineFigure3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/e42c34cb901b468f6b986dc1.png"},{"id":96073222,"identity":"49241556-ddf1-465c-90d9-78b7434c04c2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:38","extension":"png","order_by":25,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":4198,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/9ed1aa4d2e4aa68893f332c6.png"},{"id":96249530,"identity":"285ea87c-35bc-4619-9622-00265ab21be5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:33:51","extension":"png","order_by":26,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":12512,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/af90a5fe4bb6d8cd685b2e6a.png"},{"id":96073214,"identity":"222c7770-8a7a-4ea9-a618-0debca7e9ed4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:38","extension":"png","order_by":27,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":46184,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/d83ecb8e93a93a303b12f9a5.png"},{"id":96073223,"identity":"7bcdd2e5-ebfc-4921-abae-df6ce0e49e76","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:38","extension":"xml","order_by":28,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":187258,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"b0dcce71210d4260a2ab54b02b9f4c521structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/6eeb9b78e5848eb3ec231afe.xml"},{"id":96248936,"identity":"13296844-20c5-4b36-a831-e58d0a994690","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:29:43","extension":"html","order_by":29,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":201965,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/e485b96374bb876219ec2d18.html"},{"id":96248157,"identity":"74280efa-a5f9-404a-9ae9-97312b5582d7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:28:06","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":68240,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSee image above for figure legend\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/bf0acd2172918c2045a66d0b.png"},{"id":96249230,"identity":"14719581-f9f0-47ef-a7c3-0f50539d13a2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:30:56","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":563046,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eGenetic transformation of chestnut somatic embryos with \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene. A, C: Kan-resistant somatic embryos obtained from CI-3 (A) and CI-9 (C) lines after 14 weeks on selective medium with kanamycin. B, D: The same transgenic somatic embryos of line CI-3 (B) and CI-9 (D) showing GFP fluorescence. E: GFP expression on an apex of transgenic plant. F: GFP expression on a leaf of transgenic plant (left) and untransformed plant (right). B, D, E, F: visualization on an epi-fluorescence stereomicroscope under UV light. A-D: Bar 2 mm.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/785690d6def67fed05acb845.png"},{"id":96073190,"identity":"67f36693-6a44-4817-9039-061ca3a0a997","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":38122,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePCR-based detection of the presence of transgenes in putative chestnut transgenic lines. A: Amplification of NPTII product of 472-bp. B: Amplification of EGFP product of 740-bp. C: Amplification of Cast_Gnk2-like product of 890-bp. M: DNA size marker; Lanes 1, 6: DNA from non-transgenic somatic embryos (negative control). P: DNA from plasmid (positive control). Lanes 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8: DNA from embryogenic transgenic lines.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/541a26ba4f721b9ac9da3ff1.png"},{"id":96249679,"identity":"75f7b9b0-13a3-44f7-a0d4-2d6ce59d4c91","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:35:58","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":44885,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFold change of Cast_Gnk2-like expression among transformed lines, relative to the respective non-transgenic lines. Green: transformed lines from the CI-3-WT genotype; Blue: transformed lines from the CI-9-WT genotype. Asterisk indicates that the p-value obtained from the Kruskal-Wallis post hoc test is lower than 0.05 and hence considered statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/18bb84978ab7d8bd4d10e1ae.png"},{"id":96247331,"identity":"cd693156-8399-466d-90fc-1c81efdf256d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-19 07:27:23","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2189392,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eEvaluation of \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e tolerance in transgenic plants derived from the CI-3 genotype. Plants of CI-3-G1, CI-3-G3 and CI-3-WT were infected with Pc zoospores (10⁷ zoospores/mL) to assess their level of tolerance to the pathogen. A-C. Symptoms on explants after 7 days post-inoculation (7 dpi). Bars: (1 cm). D-F. Detail of cell death symptoms on explants stained with Trypan Blue (TB). Bars: (1 cm). G. Disease symptoms expressed in percent related to the total number of explants per treatment (n = 6), at 7 dpi, where: 0. No symptoms, 1. Leaf chlorosis and light necrosis on roots, 2. Apparent necrosis on leaves and light necrosis on roots, 3. High necrosis on leaves and roots, 4. Decayed explant. H. Root necrosis percentage on explants at 7 dpi. I. Fresh weight lost expressed in percentage related to controls at 7 dpi. The * in H denotes a statistically significant difference using variance check (P-value ≤ 0.05) and Tukey HSD test.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/03fedf71b2bd20ec7baf05b3.png"},{"id":96073200,"identity":"ec64f8c8-a4f1-4b22-bdc2-fe0776463bcd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2679328,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eEvaluation of \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e tolerance in transgenic plants derived from the CI-9 genotype. Plants of CI-9-G1, CI-9-G11 and CI-9-WT were infected with Pc zoospores (10⁷ zoospores/mL) to assess their level of tolerance to the pathogen. A-C. Symptoms on explants after 7 days post-inoculation (7 dpi). Bars: (1 cm). D-F. Detail of cell death symptoms on explants stained with Trypan Blue (TB). Bars: (1 cm). G. Disease symptoms expressed in percent related to the total number of explants per treatment (n = 6), at 7 dpi, where: 0. No symptoms, 1. Leaf chlorosis and light necrosis on roots, 2. Apparent necrosis on leaves and light necrosis on roots, 3. High necrosis on leaves and roots, 4. Decayed explant. H. Root necrosis percentage on explants at 7 dpi. I. Fresh weight lost expressed in percentage related to controls at 7 dpi. The * in H denotes a statistically significant difference using variance check (P-value ≤ 0.05) and Tukey HSD test.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/8c846552df08cd9bf84fec24.png"},{"id":100069273,"identity":"91aadfcd-3e9b-4593-aac5-92ec622a53b2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-12 16:12:28","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":6932501,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/87d43b96-28eb-4fb5-9a15-4963eb2420fd.pdf"},{"id":96073185,"identity":"180892be-c2c0-40ef-bfbe-68523fb87be5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":16609,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Table1.Cscopynumber.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/7cebe7ee88d173b7c5d3b2a4.docx"},{"id":96073188,"identity":"f56c0e92-a9d6-4f72-837f-4646be4dca95","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":14544,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Table2Plantregeneration.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/f9f72abfffa1b9dde9657b2f.docx"},{"id":96073191,"identity":"40c96ffa-9390-42bd-a568-c69a60db09ec","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"pdf","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":24358,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Supplementaryinformation1Construction.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/3185c17335ca8500c7ff526d.pdf"},{"id":96073195,"identity":"162ba555-bbd3-42f8-a2e8-c42fb2f90ed5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-17 10:13:37","extension":"pdf","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":346794,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Supplementaryinformation2Primersrelation.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7973831/v1/a4fd6ed92cbf95d8297578cb.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Overexpression of Ginkbilobin-2 homologous domain gene to enhance the tolerance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in plants of European chestnut","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eAmong the chestnut species, \u003cem\u003eCastanea sativa\u003c/em\u003e Mill. is considered the only native species of the genus in Europe with a circum-Mediterranean distribution that extends from the Atlantic to the Caspian Sea [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. Although primarily a forest tree, chestnut is also used in agriculture as a cultivated crop. Chestnut trees can appear isolated, forming groves of pure masses or in mixed masses together with different oak species or pines, although it is frequently to appear forming pure masses of anthropic origin called chestnut groves (in Spanish \u003cem\u003ecasta\u0026ntilde;ero\u003c/em\u003es or \u003cem\u003esoutos\u003c/em\u003e or in Portuguese \u003cem\u003ecastanhais\u003c/em\u003e) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. Chestnut agrosystems have been declared of community interest habitat within Directive 92/43/CEE of the European Union [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e], to promote their conservation, especially taking into account the threats that weigh on them and their great economic, ecological and social value. The species is valued for its high-quality wood and edible fruits, the chestnuts, whose cultivation is rising due to strong demand and versatile uses (dried, purees, flours, jams, preserves, stews, or marron glac\u0026eacute;) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. Worldwide production is estimated at 2.21 Mt per year, with contributions from about 46 countries, 27 of them in Europe [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. In addition, in the last years, chestnut fruits are being used to fed Galician pork from which are yielded high-quality products such as Chestnut-fed Galician ham pork, as well as a variety of premium cold meat [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e]. The chestnut tree is also an emblematic species that supports a large number of traditional uses, being part of our culture for centuries as a food resource, essential for people and livestock, as well as an element of construction, crafts and essential fuel in many towns, also constituting one of the best examples of a comprehensive and sustainable productive ecosystem [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. Chestnut ecosystems are also closely linked with tourism, leisure and well-being, and their exploitation as mentioned before represents a fundamental pillar for rural development in less productive areas, where the creation of employment and generation of income are vital.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRoot-rot or ink disease (\u003cem\u003ePhytophthora spp.\u003c/em\u003e) and chestnut blight (\u003cem\u003eCryphonectria parasitica\u003c/em\u003e (Murrill) Barr) are the most significant threats to European chestnut [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. Due to the economic and ecological importance of this species, breeding programs have long sought to develop \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e Rands (Pc)-resistant genotypes [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR11 CR12 CR13\" citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. Traditional breeding efforts have led to the development of tolerant hybrids through controlled crosses between \u003cem\u003eC. sativa\u003c/em\u003e and resistant Asian species (\u003cem\u003eC. crenata\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eC. mollissima\u003c/em\u003e). However, many of these hybrids usually present lower fruit quality compared to pure \u003cem\u003eC. sativa\u003c/em\u003e. While hybrid rootstocks have proven highly effective in mitigating Pc damage, they have demonstrated limited adaptability to colder and drier conditions in southern areas, where late frosts and droughts can compromise their survival [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. Despite these limitations, they remain the only viable strategy against ink disease to ensure the sustainability of European chestnut orchards.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOne of the main challenges of conventional breeding in trees is the long time required to obtain new tolerant genotypes due to their biological cycle. To overcome this limitation, modern breeding programs now integrate genomic tools to accelerate the selection process and enhance precision. The use of transcriptomics, genetic mapping, and histopathology has provided key insights into the resistance mechanisms of Asian species, facilitating their transfer to \u003cem\u003eC. sativa\u003c/em\u003e [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR17 CR18\" citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. Notably, transcriptomic analyses identified several defence-related genes, including those involved in pathogen recognition, cell wall reinforcement, hormonal signalling pathways (salicylic acid, ethylene, and jasmonic acid), and antifungal activity. Among them, the \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2 like\u003c/em\u003e gene of \u003cem\u003eC. crenata\u003c/em\u003e, encoding an antifungal protein, emerged as a key marker distinguishing resistant from susceptible chestnut genotypes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. This gene was subsequently used in \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e-mediated transformation studies of embryogenic chestnut lines, as well as for protein purification and functional validation [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR21\" citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGenetic transformation of the disease-prone \u003cem\u003eCastanea\u003c/em\u003e species with antifungal or antimicrobial genes to increase disease resistance or tolerance is a reliable and complementary biotechnological alternative to conventional breeding efforts [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. In European chestnut a genetic transformation protocol with marker genes was described for the first time by [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e], and later optimized by [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e] through somatic embryogenesis. Subsequently, since the genes involved on chestnut tolerance to Pc and \u003cem\u003eC. parasitica\u003c/em\u003e were unknown, two pathogenesis-related proteins, namely a thaumatin-like protein [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e] and a chitinase [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e], were overexpressed in chestnut somatic embryos to assess their impact on the diseases affecting this species. However, in the last few years, considerable information about the mechanisms and genes involved on tolerance to Pc has been described, as the already focused \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e, that may play a role in resistance to this oomycete pathogen. \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e encodes a cysteine-rich repeat secretory protein and notably shares homology with Ginkbilobin2 (Gnk2), produced in gymnosperms in response to both biotic and abiotic stresses [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e], further underscoring its potential involvement in stress-related defence mechanisms in other plant species. In \u003cem\u003eGinkgo biloba\u003c/em\u003e, Gnk2 is a secreted protein which binds with high affinity to D-mannose, being related with the attachment and disturbance to the cell wall of plant pathogenic fungi [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e]. In previous reports, our group has overexpressed this antifungal gene on somatic embryos of holm oak and cork oak, and plants that overexpressed \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e survived more days than wild type controls during \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e tests with the pathogen [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAfter the functional analysis studies of \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e in Pc-susceptible oaks, it's now the turn of \u003cem\u003eC. sativa\u003c/em\u003e, with the objectives of the present work being the following: 1) Genetic transformation of \u003cem\u003eC. sativa\u003c/em\u003e embryogenic cultures with the antifungal gene \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e and evaluation of transformation efficiency; 2) Molecular characterisation of transgenic lines; and 3) Plant regeneration and evaluation of their tolerance to Pc.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Material and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003ePlant material\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eEmbryonic lines named CI-3 and CI-9 were used as a source of explants to carry out the transformation experiments. These lines were maintained by secondary embryogenesis as described in [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e] with subcultures at 6-week intervals in proliferation medium defined as Murashige and Skoog medium [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e] with half-strength macronutrients and supplemented with 0.1 mg/l benzyladenine (BA), 0.1 mg/l naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 3% sucrose (w/v), 0.7% Agar Sigma (w/v; A-1296, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The embryogenic lines were cultured under a 16-h photoperiod (provided by cool-white fluorescent lamps at a photon flux density of 50\u0026ndash;60 \u0026micro;mol m\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e s\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e) and 25\u0026ordm;C light/20\u0026ordm;C dark temperatures (standard conditions).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePhytophtora cinnamomi\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eRands\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhytophtora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e strain was kindly provided by TRAGSA (Maceda nursery, Orense, Spain) and isolated by the Center for Research and Technology of Extremadura (CYCYTEX), located in M\u0026eacute;rida, Spain. The \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e mycelium culture was obtained from a fresh plate using previous describe methodology [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR32\" citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. The zoospore stock was obtained, and saved at \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;80\u0026ordm;C until use, following the previous optimized protocol at [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePlasmid construction and\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eAgrobacterium tumefaciens\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003estrain\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe Gateway system (Invitrogen, USA) was used to clone the \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene into the plasmid pK7WG2D [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e] under the CaMV35S promoter, as described by [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. The vector also includes the neomycin phosphotransferase (\u003cem\u003eNPTII\u003c/em\u003e) selective gene, and the green fluorescent protein (\u003cem\u003eEGFP\u003c/em\u003e) reporter gene, used for the selection of transformed embryos. The final vector, denominated as pK7WG2D-GIN (see Supplementary information 1), was transferred into \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium tumefaciens\u003c/em\u003e strain EHA105 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e] by the freeze-thaw method [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e] and used in the transformation experiments.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eTransformation of somatic embryos\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor transformation, the procedure described in [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e] was applied, starting from explants that consisted of small clumps of 2 or 3 somatic embryos in globular or early-torpedo stage, isolated from two chestnut embryogenic lines. \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e strain and infection culture was prepared following the procedure described by [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. For each embryogenic line, 120 explants were used (6 Petri dishes with 10 explants and the experiment was repeated twice) resulting in a total of 240 explants. Additionally, for each line 20 explants that were not infected and were cultured on proliferation medium without antibiotics (positive control) and with antibiotics (negative control). Explants were co-cultured for 5 days in darkness with the \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium tumefaciens\u003c/em\u003e strain EHA105pK7WG2D-GIN. Then, bacteria were eliminated by a wash with sterilized water supplemented with 300 mg/l cefotaxime for 30 min, and subsequently explants were transferred to selective proliferation medium with 100 mg/l kanamycin (Kan), 200 mg/l cefotaxime and 300 mg/l carbenicillin. Cultures were subcultured every two weeks for a total duration of 10 weeks. Kan-resistant explants were subsequently identified, and the percentage of Kan-resistant explants (defined as the proportion of initial explants exhibiting Kan tolerance) was calculated.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eSelection and establishment of transgenic lines\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKan-resistant explants were isolated and sub-cultured on selective medium with 150 mg/l Kan to increase the selective pressure. The transformation efficiency (TE, defined as the percentage of initial explants that showed fluorescence [GFP+]) were determined after 14 weeks. Fluorescence was observed using a Leica M205 FA magnifier (Germany) equipped with a 200 W lamp and a specific fluorescence filter, with an excitation of 470/40x nm and an emission of 525/50 nm. Images were obtained with a Leica DSC7000T camera (Germany). A single somatic embryo at the cotyledonary stage was isolated from each GFP\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;explant. Each embryo was proliferated by secondary embryogenesis in selective medium to establish the different transgenic embryogenic lines. Twelve weeks after isolation Kan was removed and transgenic lines were multiplied on proliferation medium.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMolecular analysis of transformed embryogenic lines\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGene presence analysis\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe presence of the transgenes (\u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene and marker genes \u003cem\u003eGFP\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eNPTII\u003c/em\u003e) was confirmed by PCR amplification, as described in [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]. DNA was obtained from transformed and untransformed (WT) somatic embryos using the Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Once extracted, the DNA concentration was quantified using a Nanodrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). All amplification reactions were carried out in an MJ Mini thermal cycler (BioRad, USA), using a 25 \u0026micro;l reaction volume. The reaction consisted of 250\u0026ndash;500 ng of genomic DNA, 0.5 \u0026micro;l of MgCl, 0.1 \u0026micro;l of Taq DNA Polymerase (Qiagen, Germany), 2.5 mM of dNTPs, and 15 \u0026micro;M of primers. The primer sequences, the amplification programs used, the fragment size generated are described in Supplementary information 2. The PCR amplification products were resolved in 1.5% (w/v) agarose gels.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGene copy number estimation\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe number of \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e copies inserted into embryogenic transformed lines was estimated using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), as described by [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]. DNA was extracted as outlined in the previous section, and three biological replicates per line were prepared. Specific oligos targeting \u003cem\u003eNPTII\u003c/em\u003e were utilized in the reactions (see Supplementary Information 2). A standard curve was established following the method of [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e], by mixing the plasmid used for transformation with non-transformed genomic DNA. Based on the genome size of \u003cem\u003eC. sativa\u003c/em\u003e reported by [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e], we calculated the amount of plasmid required to be mixed with non-transgenic DNA to simulate 1, 2, 5, and 10 copies of the transgene. The qPCR cycling included a subsequent step for melting curve analysis. The qPCR experiments incorporated no template controls, two technical replicates, and two repetitions. The copy number in each sample was estimated by making the correspondence between the C\u003csub\u003eT\u003c/sub\u003e values and the simulated copies of the transgene.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGene expression analysis\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe expression of \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e was analyzed using qPCR. Total RNA was extracted from non-transformed and transformed lines, utilizing somatic embryos at the early cotyledonary stage. The extraction followed a CTAB buffer protocol as outlined by [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. Three biological replicates were taken from three distinct embryo clumps. The extracted RNA was treated with the TURBO DNA-free\u0026trade; Kit (Invitrogen, USA) to remove any potential DNA contamination. RNA integrity was confirmed on 1% (w/v) agarose gels. Total RNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop\u0026trade; One Microvolume UV\u0026ndash;Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Three \u0026micro;g of total RNA were used as the template for reverse transcription with RevertAid H Minus Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), primed with an oligo(dT)\u003csub\u003e23\u003c/sub\u003e. Specific primers for \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e are detailed in the Supplementary Information 2. For each reaction, 1.2 ng of cDNA were used in a 15 \u0026micro;L final volume, which included 7.5 \u0026micro;L of NZYSupreme qPCR Green Master Mix (2x) (NZYtech, Portugal). Each primer was used at a final concentration of 0.2 \u0026micro;M in a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad, USA). The qPCR reactions began with a denaturation step at 95\u0026ordm;C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95\u0026ordm;C for 15 seconds and annealing for 30 seconds. Each set of reactions included a no-template control, two technical replicates and two repetitions. Dissociation curves were used to check for non-specific PCR products. To normalize the expression data, \u003cem\u003eElongation factor 1-alpha\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eEF1α\u003c/em\u003e) and \u003cem\u003eActin\u003c/em\u003e (D. Matthews, personal communication, August 24, 2023) were used as reference genes (Supplementary Information 2). Gene expression was calculated using the Hellemans method [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePlant regeneration of transgenic embryos\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGermination and plant regeneration was performed following the protocols defined by [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e]. Cotyledonary embryos (\u0026gt;5 mm) were isolated and matured on maturation medium for further development. After 4 weeks, they were cold-stored at 4\u0026deg;C in dim light conditions for 2 months, before being cultured on germination medium. Plant conversion rates were generally low, but some embryos developed shoots. These shoots were multiplied via axillary budding proliferation and rooted following [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. Briefly, elongated shoots were rooted in rooting medium defined as GD medium (Gresshoff and Doy, 1972; Duchefa, Netherlands) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e] with third-strength macronutrients supplemented with 25 mg/l IBA and 0.6% BD Agar Difco (w/v; Difco Laboratories, New Jersey, USA). Shoots were cultured in rooting medium for 48 h in darkness and later transferred to auxin-free rooting medium. Fluorescence was also tested on leaves from transgenic and non-transgenic plants (control) as described before for somatic embryos.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eIn vitro\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003etolerance assays\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePlant growth conditions\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePlants obtained as described above were transferred from agar to plastic sterile tubes containing 1 ml of sterilized water and they were incubated in an Aralab chamber (Lisbon, Portugal), at 50% humidity, temperature of 24\u0026deg;C during the day and 18\u0026deg;C during the night, with a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod and light intensity of 150 \u0026micro;E. m\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e per second for all experiments. They were maintained in these conditions for a week for acclimation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePlant infection\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePlants were transferred to sterile DeWit\u0026reg; culture tubes (Sgl, Barcelona, Spain), containing 1 ml of sterile water and maintained for an additional three days for further acclimation. The plants were divided into two groups: a control group and an inoculated group. The inoculated plants were transferred to culture tubes with 1 ml of Pc zoospores at a final concentration of 10\u003csup\u003e7\u003c/sup\u003e zoospores/ml, while control plants were transferred to sterilized water, following a previous optimized protocol [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDisease evaluation symptoms\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe plant disease symptoms produced by Pc were considered following the standards approved for diagnostic protocols for regulated pests by EPPO council [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e]. Those symptoms included principally root rot brown lesions followed by necrosis produced directly by the pathogen and secondary symptoms of decline producing leave chlorosis, high necrosis and death. Disease symptoms were followed for 7 days using a modified infection criteria described by [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e] as followed: 0. No symptoms, 1. Leaf chlorosis and light necrosis on roots, 2. Apparent necrosis on leaves and light necrosis on roots, 3. High necrosis on leaves and roots, 4. Decomposed plants.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFresh weight (FW) was measured at 7 dpi, to calculate the fresh weight lost (FWL) Following the formula:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePhotographs of the explants were captured for assessing root necrosis (RN). The quantification of root infection and necrosis involved measuring the total length of the infected root and the segments showing necrosis at 7 dpi using the software ImageJ. The calculations were performed using the following formula:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eNecrotic lesions were measured by Trypan blue staining, performed as previously described [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e]. Roots were stained with Trypan Blue solution for 20 min, rinsed with 100% ethanol over two days, and preserved in 60% glycerol until microscopic observation. At least six photos were quantified per root area and treatment. Image processing was performed using ImageJ Software and specific plug-in tools for measuring root necrosis as previously described in [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe effect of genotype on genetic transformation data was analyzed using G-test (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Gene expression levels were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by a Dunn\u0026rsquo;s test for significance analysis of the transgenic lines compared to the untransformed genotypes at p-value\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). Both analyses were performed using the SPSS 29.0 statistical package for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). In the tolerance assay, the Stat Graphics Centurion XVI.II program (Stat Point Technologies, Inc., Warrenton, VA, United States) was used for all data analysis related to plant fresh weight lost and root necrosis. ANOVA I and Duncan\u0026rsquo;s mean comparison test were performed for all experiments and t-tests with a significance level of 0.05% (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e). In ANOVA analyses, percentages were subjected to square-root transformation prior to analysis to normalize the data. In the case of non-homogeneous variance, a non-parametric Kruskal\u0026ndash;Wallis test was used.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eGenetic transformation of somatic embryos\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eKan-resistant somatic embryos were detected after 10 weeks in both lines (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e), but the two lines exhibited distinct behaviours during selection. After initiating culture in the selection medium, embryo explants turned brownish/blackish, particularly in lines CI-3. New growth was observed in CI-9 line within 4 weeks, with the number of Kan-resistant explants increasing over time. In contrast, CI-3 required at least 8 weeks to show new growth. After 10 weeks, Kan-resistant frequency was determined and it was found to be significantly influenced (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.001) by genotype of embryogenic lines (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). As result of this, line CI-9 exhibited frequencies of 14.2%, whereas line CI-3 showed significantly lower values of 2.5%. Kan-resistant explants were isolated from both lines and subcultured for an additional four weeks on selective medium to promote embryogenic development and confirm kanamycin tolerance (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA,C).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe transformation efficiency assessed based on the fluorescence of surviving explants (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB,D) was also genotype-dependent (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The TE was significantly higher (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.001) in CI-9 line (14.2%) than in the CI-3 line (2.5%) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). A total of 12 independent transformed lines were established. Successful embryo proliferation by secondary embryogenesis occurred in all established transgenic lines. After 6 weeks on selective medium, the number of secondary somatic embryos per explant was recorded to assess multiplication capacity (data not shown) and embryogenic lines with the highest multiplication ability were selected for further research: two transgenic lines from genotype CI-3 (CI-3-G1 and CI-3-G3) and four transgenic lines from genotype CI-9 (CI-9-G1, CI-9-G4, CI-9-G11, and CI-9-G12).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMolecular analysis of transgenic lines\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe presence of transgenes (\u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene and marker genes \u003cem\u003eGFP\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eNPTII\u003c/em\u003e) in genomic DNA of transgenic embryogenic lines with high proliferation ability was confirmed by PCR (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). PCR amplification was obtained in all chestnut transgenic lines tested, as well as in the plasmid (positive control), but not in the untransformed lines (negative control) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). The estimation of \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e copy number in embryogenic transformed lines was obtained through the amplification of an \u003cem\u003eNPTII\u003c/em\u003e fragment, which is adjacent to \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e in the T-DNA (Supplementary information 1). All the transformed lines have the same number of transgenes in their genome, estimated as one copy (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). As expected, non-transformed genotypes have zero copies of \u003cem\u003eNPTII\u003c/em\u003e gene.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eEstimated copy number in \u003cem\u003eC. sativa\u003c/em\u003e somatic embryogenic lines transformed with \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene. \u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e Values from the correlation between the quantity of plasmid and the number of copies in \u003cem\u003eC. sativa\u003c/em\u003e, as described in Material and Methods.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eLine\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eC\u003csub\u003eT\u003c/sub\u003e Mean\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eC\u003csub\u003eT\u003c/sub\u003e Standard deviation\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eEstimated copy number\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCI-3-WT\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e32,71\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2,32\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCI-3-G1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e23,95\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,03\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCI-3-G3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e23,37\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0,48\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCI-9-WT\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e30,22\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0,51\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCI-9-G1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e22,35\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0,64\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCI-9-G4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e22,47\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0,46\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCI-9-G11\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e23,65\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0,73\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCI-9-G12\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e23,74\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,40\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTransgene expression in each transformed line was compared to the corresponding non-transformed genotypes in somatic embryos (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e oligos used in qPCR were designed from the coding sequence of \u003cem\u003eC. crenata\u003c/em\u003e. Since \u003cem\u003eC. sativa\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eC. crenata\u003c/em\u003e belong to the same genus, both endogenous and transgene transcripts may be amplified in the same reaction. However, \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e had CaMV35S as the promoter, which has a constitutive action, so an expression level in transformed lines higher than in non-transformed genotypes was expected. This was true and significant for the CI-3-G1, CI-9-G1, and CI-9-G11 transformed lines (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e), indicating that these lines exhibit overexpression of the putative resistance gene \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003ePlant regeneration from transgenic somatic embryos\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eRegeneration occurred in all transgenic lines after two months of cold storage and subsequent transfer to germination medium, except CI-9-G4 (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Total regeneration (shoot and plant conversion) was higher in the non-transformed lines than in the transformed lines (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The frequency of plant regeneration was low across all transformed lines and in CI-9-WT, with percentages ranging from 4.2% to 16.6%. Only an acceptable plant regeneration percentage was observed in line CI-3-WT (37.5%). In all cases, regenerated shoots were multiplied via axillary shoot proliferation, enabling unlimited production of transgenic shoots for rooting and acclimatization. GFP expression was also detected in shoots and leaves isolated from transgenic plants (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eE,F). As expected, no green fluorescence was observed in leaves isolated from non-transformed regenerated plants (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eF).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePlant regeneration performance with only root development, only shoot development and conversion into plantlets (root and shoot development) of different chestnut transformed and untransformed lines (WT) after 8 weeks on germination medium.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eLINE\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eONLY ROOT\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eONLY SHOOT\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCONVERSION\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e(root\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;shoot)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTOTAL PLANT REGENERATION\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e(%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eRL (mm)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e(%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSL (mm)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e(%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e%\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eLINES CI-3\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCI-3-WT\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e33.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.5\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e14.7\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.7\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e25.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e37.5\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCI-3-G1\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e20.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e6.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.8\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12.5\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCI-3-G3\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e25.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.7\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e10.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.5\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eLINES CI-9\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCI-9-WT\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e20.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e6.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e16.6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCI-9-G1\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.8\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.2\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCI-9-G4\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCI-9-G11\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.7\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.2\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCI-9-G12\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e16.7\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.9\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eEach value represents the mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;standard error of 3 replications with 8 somatic embryos in each replicate. RL, root length; SL, shoot length. \u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003eTotal Plan Regeneration is obtained from the sum of only shoot rate and plant conversion rate.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eDisease ratio analysis of transformed plants\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe analysis of the overexpressing lines CI-3-G1, Cl-3-G3, CI-9-G1 and Cl-9-G11, transformed with \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene under CaMV35S promoter control, produced lines with no apparent differences from non-transformed plants n terms of plant growth and development, allowing the subsequent analysis of resistance to Pc. The analysis revealed less statistically significant root necrosis caused by Pc in transformed lines when compared to the untransformed controls, although differences into levels of disease symptoms were observed (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e). Differences in the progression of symptoms among CI-3-WT, CI-3-G1, and CI-3-G3 lines, such as chlorosis and necrosis, are visible in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA\u0026ndash;C. The root necrosis induced by the oomycete was evident in CI-3-WT lines and was confirmed by the trypan blue staining of root death cells, being lower in transformed plants (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eD\u0026ndash;F). The symptoms observed in roots were quantified by disease ratio, which is shown at Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eG. This data reveals a significantly lower disease severity and root necrosis than CI-3-WT (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eH). Although transformed lines Cl-3-G1 and Cl-3-G3 exhibited an apparently lower fresh weight loss compared to the WT, the differences were not statistically significant (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eI). Considering all the data, CI-3-G3 showed higher tolerance than G1, although the differences were not statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003ea similar analysis of the transformed lines CI-9-G1 and CI-9-G11, with the background Cl-9-WT, is shown. The results illustrate that the symptoms in both \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e overexpressing lines in response to Pc after 7 days were less severe relatively to the WT plants. Actually, lines CI-9-G1 and CI-9-G11 showed less root necrosis and lower disease indexes (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eG-H), especially line CI-9-G11 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA-C). Those results were in line with the levels of cell death on roots confirmed by trypan blue staining (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eD-F). Line CI9-G1 showed much less differences with the WT, however still significant (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eH). The differences in fresh weight loss between line CI-9-G11 and the WT were not statistically significant. By contrast, line CI-9-G1 presented a higher fresh weight loss compared to the WT, suggesting a possible pleiotropic effect in this line produced by the insertion (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eI).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOverall, CI-3-G3 and CI-9-G11 consistently demonstrated reductions in root necrosis upon Pc infection compared with WT, pointing that overexpression of the \u003cem\u003eGnk2\u003c/em\u003e homolog (\u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2\u003c/em\u003e-like) has a positive effect in the defense to the pathogen. Variability in resistance among the different lines indicates that further molecular analyses are needed to fully understand the observed differences.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003ePathogens as fungi, oomycetes, bacteria, and viruses compromise plant health and survival leading to significant economic losses [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e]. Among these, ink disease, primarily caused by the oomycete Pc, has severely affected chestnut populations for many years. Since chemical treatments with fungicides and pesticides have proven largely ineffective, developing genotypes tolerant to the pathogen represents the most promising strategy. Biotechnological tools such as somatic embryogenesis and genetic transformation provide effective approaches for developing disease-tolerant genotypes especially in woody plants and for gaining insight into the mechanisms by which plants defend themselves against pathogens [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e]. The overexpression of antifungal proteins represents an interesting strategy to enhance plant tolerance against fungal diseases, with potential applications in agricultural biotechnology [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn this study, the overexpression of the \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e, homologous to an antifungal protein, was obtained in the two embryogenic lines tested, although the transformation rates were influenced by the genotype. The effect of genotype on transformation frequencies has also been reported in other woody species, such as American chestnut [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e] and pedunculate oak [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e], emphasizing the importance of genetic background in determining the success of genetic transformation procedures. The transformation rates in chestnut were higher than those previously mentioned in holm oak [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e] and cork oak [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e] using the same construct and the same \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e strain. The use of the GFP as a marker gene enabled direct visual selection of transformed embryos, facilitating their identification. Although GFP has been reported to exhibit cytotoxic effects in some plant cells [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e], evidence obtained in the present paper and other species like pear [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e], rubber tree [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e], holm oak [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e], and cork oak [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e] indicate that GFP does not negatively affect embryo development or plant regeneration.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe conversion of somatic embryos into plants remains a major limiting factor in most embryogenic systems of woody species [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e]. This limitation is even more pronounced in transgenic somatic embryos [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e], likely due to extended culture in kanamycin-containing media [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e]. Although conversion frequencies in European chestnut were low, the resulting shoots could be excised and easily multiplied through axillary bud proliferation and were subsequently rooted, thus producing viable plants for tolerance assays. A similar approach was also successfully used in cork oak for the regeneration of plants from somatic embryos overexpressing the \u003cem\u003eCsTL1\u003c/em\u003e gene, which encodes a thaumatin-like protein [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe number of \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene copies in transgenic lines was estimated to be one. Low copies of the chestnut thaumatin-like protein gene (one and two) were also obtained with \u003cem\u003eC. sativa\u003c/em\u003e somatic embryos in our previous study [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. One copy of the inserted gene is important to avoid transgene silencing. Despite the single number of \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e copies, the expression level was notably different among transgenic lines. Besides copy number, other factors may influence transgene expression, such as the position and integration of the T-DNA in the genome, and the use of the CaMV35S promoter [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e]. The promoter was used to confer the overexpression of \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene, which was essential to proceed with the gene functional analysis. Expression levels of overexpressed genes considerably differ among different transgenic lines, even when the same gene and promoter are used. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate multiple lines to select those with adequate expression levels, as only lines surpassing a minimum threshold typically exhibit the desired phenotype, such as enhanced pathogen resistance.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe tolerance of the lines overexpressing the \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene was evaluated in regenerated plants through an \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e assay. \u003cem\u003eIn vitro\u003c/em\u003e testing techniques represent a valuable tool for the identification and selection of cultivars with tolerance or resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e63\u003c/span\u003e]. This approach offers significant advantages over field trials, as it allows for faster, more cost-effective evaluations under controlled conditions, thereby reducing the time, space, and resources required, as well as the avoidance of pathogen escape. Moreover, the controlled laboratory environment enables the uniform reproduction of specific stress conditions, improving both the accuracy and reproducibility of the results. In the present study, \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e assays were performed using previously isolated stocks of virulent zoospores of Pc, using an optimized protocol [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e], enabling a more precise and reliable assessment of plant tolerance compared to previous methods that relied on mycelium plugs. The \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e tests revealed that the insertions introduced into the transformed plants with \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene, improved the tolerance to Pc when compared to the non-transformed. However, the lines CI-3-G3 and CI-9_G11 were significantly more tolerant than CI-3-G1 and CI-9-G1. These less tolerant lines exhibited \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e fold change over 30-fold higher, whereas the more tolerant showed lower overexpression. This suggests that Cast_Gnk2-like may induce trade-off during the progression of infection, potentially compromising the efficiency of the plant\u0026rsquo;s immuneresponses. In some cases, such as in line CI-9-G1, the transformation may have triggered pleiotropic effects that altered plant development. For example, the lower fresh weight loss observed in this line during infection could be a consequence of a slight increase in shoot growth. Rapid shoot growth or accelerated flowering shortly after pathogen exposure is often observed in plants attempting to survive stress. Further molecular analysis of the transgene insertion is therefore required to confirm whether these developmental changes are linked to the observed variation in tolerance.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn this study, the enhanced tolerance to Pc observed in lines CI-3-G3 and CI-9-G11 confirms the relevance of \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2\u003c/em\u003e-like gene overexpression as part of a strategy for plant protection against the pathogen. Similarly, overexpression of \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2\u003c/em\u003e-like has been successfully achieved in both holm oak and cork oak through genetic transformation, leading to increased tolerance to Pc [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. In these species, transformed plants exhibited significantly improved survival rates and reduced root necrosis. Furthermore, overexpression of \u003cem\u003eGNK2-1\u003c/em\u003e from \u003cem\u003eGinkgo biloba\u003c/em\u003e seed kernels in cucumber also demonstrated a stable and significant inhibitory effect on \u003cem\u003eFusarium oxysporum\u003c/em\u003e growth [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e64\u003c/span\u003e]. The antifungal activity of Gnk2 is attributed to the presence of the DUF26 domain, characteristic of cysteine-rich lectins and defense-related proteins. This domain confers lectin activity, allowing the protein to bind to mannose and mannan residues in fungal cell walls, thereby disrupting their integrity and inhibiting fungal growth [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIt might be plausible that \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene contributes to the synergistic interaction between lectins and pectins within the plant root defense machinery against Pc. Lectins and pectin work together in a multi-layered defense system, where lectins act as sensors and pectin serves as a target or trigger for immune responses against pathogens in the root environment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e65\u003c/span\u003e]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that Pc zoospores show pectinase activity during penetration of plant roots [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e]. One might speculate that the effect of Cast_Gnk2-like might not only be a direct antimicrobial effect on Pc, but also improve the pectin barrier and lectin activity in roots, improving root protection against the penetration of zoospores. This hypothesis has been previously suggested for another antimicrobial proteins [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e66\u003c/span\u003e], but would require further molecular analysis for the case of Gnk2. Consequently, the overexpression of soluble lectins or lectin receptor kinases may reduce pathogen growth and may activate defense responses such as the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), expression of pathogenesis-related genes, and the strengthening of cell walls, thereby enhancing the plant\u0026rsquo;s overall resistance to infections [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR68\" citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e67\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e69\u003c/span\u003e]. The mechanism seems very similar to that of glucanases or chitinases, which degrade key structural components of the pathogen\u0026rsquo;s cell wall. Taken together, these studies reinforce the idea that weakening the structural integrity of the pathogen\u0026rsquo;s cell wall, whether through molecular binding or enzymatic degradation, is an effective strategy to prevent infection. In turn, a broader theory is supported that a significant part of plant tolerance or resistance relies on the ability to recognize and target essential cell wall components of the pathogen, thereby blocking its colonization and progression. Overall, the studies concur that weakening the pathogen\u0026rsquo;s cell wall, whether by binding or enzymatic degradation, constitutes an effective means of preventing infection.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe overexpression of the \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene in European chestnut significantly enhancedtolerance to \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e. These findings support the use of antifungal protein overexpression as an effective strategy to improve resistance to fungal pathogens, and position \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene as a promising candidate for reinforcing oomycete resistance in genetically improved crops. The use of an endogenous gene from chestnut ensures better physiological compatibility, stable expression, and integration into native defense pathways. Furthermore, since \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e originates from the same genus, future development of cisgenic lines via genome editing, may be feasible, potentially circumventing some of the regulatory constrains associated with transgenic approaches. In addition to improved pathogen tolerance, genome editing offers the advantage of precise genetic modifications without the need for exogenous promoters or reporter genes, which can sometimes interfere with normal plant development. Finally, although the tolerance results are promising, it is necessary to confirm these data through ex vitro tolerance assays.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003ch2\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFunding\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAt MBG-CSIC, work was partly supported by Agencia Estatal de Investigaci\u0026oacute;n (AEI, Spain) through the projects PID2020-112627RB-C33 (AEI/\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.13039/501100011033\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.13039/501100011033\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) and PID2024-156422OB-C33. At BioISI, work was supported by UIDB/04046/2020 (DOI: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.54499/UIDB/\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e 04046/ 2020) and UIDP/04046/2020 (DOI: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.54499/UIDP/\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e 04046/ 2020) Centre grants from Funda\u0026ccedil;\u0026atilde;o para a Ci\u0026ecirc;ncia e a Tecnologia, Portugal. At UPM, research was partially funded by EU FEADER funds through the project \u0026ldquo;Breeding and conservation program for holm and cork oak for tolerance to oak decline\u0026rdquo; leaded by the Spanish Ministry for Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge (MITECO, Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentaci\u0026oacute;n). At INIAV this work was supported by FCT \u0026ndash; Funda\u0026ccedil;\u0026atilde;o para a Ci\u0026ecirc;ncia e Tecnologia, I.P., through project reference UID/00239/2025. Portugal. SS is being funded by an FCT contract in the project 2022.06990. PTDC (DOI: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.54499/2022.06990.PTDC\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.54499/2022.06990.PTDC\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e). PP was funded by a FPU (Formaci\u0026oacute;n de Profesorado Universitario) grant from Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci\u0026oacute;n y Universidades (MICIN, Spain) (FPU23/00921). LdC PhD contract was funded partially by Fundaci\u0026oacute;n Conde Del Valle Salazar (UPM), Spain.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eSS, MTM, EP, LdC, PP, SV, and MF investigated and performed data analyses. EC designed and managed the project. SS, RC, MB, RM and EC wrote the manuscript. All authors revised, read, and approved the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe would like to thank F\u0026aacute;tima Mosteiro, Cristina Buceta and Sol Campa\u0026ntilde;\u0026oacute; for their valuable technical assistance.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData Availability\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe protein sequence analyzed in this study (Cast_Gnk2-like) is publicly available in the NCBI Protein database and in the UniProt database under accession number P0DO63.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eConedera M, Tinner W, Krebs P, de Rigo D, Caudullo G. Castanea sativa in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San\u0026ndash;Miguel\u0026ndash;Ayanz J, De Rigo D, Caudullo G, Durrant T, Mauri A, editors. European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Luxembourg: Publ. Off. EU; 2016. pp. 78\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRoces\u0026ndash;D\u0026iacute;az JV, D\u0026iacute;az\u0026ndash;Varela ER, Barrio\u0026ndash;Anta M, \u0026Aacute;lvarez\u0026ndash;\u0026Aacute;lvarez P. Sweet chestnut agroforestry systems in north\u0026ndash;western Spain: classification, spatial distribution and an ecosystem services assessment. For Syst. 2018;27(1):e03. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.5424/fs/2018271\u0026ndash;11973\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5424/fs/2018271\u0026ndash;11973\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCouncil of the European Communities. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official J Eur Communities L 206 (22 July 1992):7\u0026ndash;50. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31992L0043\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31992L0043\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSantos MJ, Pinto T, Vilela A. Sweet chestnut (\u003cem\u003eCastanea sativa\u003c/em\u003e Mill.) nutritional and phenolic composition interactions with chestnut flavour physiology. Foods. 2022;11:4052. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/foods11244052\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/foods11244052\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMeleti Ε, Kossyva V, Maisoglou I, Vrontaki M, Manouras V, Tzereme A, Alexandraki M, Koureas M, Malissiova E, Manouras A. The nutritional benefits and sustainable by\u0026ndash;product utilization of chestnuts: a comprehensive review. Agriculture. 2024;14:2262. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/agriculture14122262\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/agriculture14122262\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGomes-Laranjo J, Pereira-Lorenzo S, Marino G. The world sector of chestnut. Acta Hortic. 2024;1400:1\u0026ndash;14. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.17660/ActaHortic.2024.1400.1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.17660/ActaHortic.2024.1400.1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTemper\u0026aacute;n S, Lorenzo JM, Dom\u0026iacute;nguez B, Franco I, Carballo J. Carcass and meat quality traits of Celta heavy pigs. Effect of the inclusion of chestnuts in the finishing diet. Span J Agric Res. 2014;12(3):494\u0026ndash;504.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBounous G. The chestnut: a multipurpose resource for the new millennium. Acta Hortic. 2005;693:33\u0026ndash;40. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.693.1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.693.1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFernandes P, Colavolpe MB, Serrazina S, Costa RL. European and American chestnuts: an overview of the main threats and control efforts. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:951844. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fpls.2022.951844\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpls.2022.951844\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVieitez AM, Vieitez ML, Vieitez E. Chestnut (\u003cem\u003eCastanea\u003c/em\u003e spp). In: Bajaj YPS, editor. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, Vol. 1: Trees I. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer\u0026ndash;; 1986. pp. 393\u0026ndash;414.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCosta R, Santos C, Tavares F, Machado H, Gomes\u0026ndash;Laranjo J, Kubisiak T et al. Mapping and transcriptomic approaches implemented for understanding disease resistance to \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinammomi\u003c/em\u003e in \u003cem\u003eCastanea\u003c/em\u003e sp. BMC Proc. 2011;5:O18. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-O18\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-O18\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSantos C, Machado H, Correia I, Gomes F, Gomes\u0026ndash;Laranjo J, Costa R. Phenotyping \u003cem\u003eCastanea\u003c/em\u003e hybrids for \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e resistance. Plant Pathol. 2015;64:901\u0026ndash;10. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/ppa.12313\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/ppa.12313\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFernandes P, Tedesco S, da Silva IV, Santos C, Machado H, Costa RL. A new clonal propagation protocol develops quality root systems in chestnut. Forests. 2020;11:826. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/F11080826\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/F11080826\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFernandes P, Amaral A, Colavolpe B, Pereira A, Costa R. Avalia\u0026ccedil;\u0026atilde;o agron\u0026oacute;mica de gen\u0026oacute;tipos de castanheiro selecionados do programa de melhoramento gen\u0026eacute;tico para a resist\u0026ecirc;ncia \u0026agrave; tinta. Vida Rural. 2021a;76\u0026ndash;82.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlcaide F, Solla A, Cherubini M, Mattioni C, Cuenca B, Camis\u0026oacute;n \u0026Aacute;, Mart\u0026iacute;n MA. Adaptive evolution of chestnut forests to the impact of ink disease in Spain. J Syst Evol. 2020;58(4):504\u0026ndash;16. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/JSE.12551/SUPPINFO\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/JSE.12551/SUPPINFO\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSerrazina S, Santos C, Machado H, Pesquita C, Vicentini R, Pais MS, et al. \u003cem\u003eCastanea\u003c/em\u003e root transcriptome in response to \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e challenge. Tree Genet Genomes. 2015;11:6. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11295-014-0829-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11295-014-0829-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSantos C, Nelson CD, Zhebentyayeva T, Machado H, Gomes\u0026ndash;Laranjo J, Costa RL. First interspecific genetic linkage map for \u003cem\u003eCastanea sativa\u003c/em\u003e \u0026times; \u003cem\u003eCastanea crenata\u003c/em\u003e revealed QTLs for resistance to \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0184381. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1371/journal.pone.0184381\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pone.0184381\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFernandes P, Machado H, do C\u0026eacute;u Silva M, Costa RL. A histopathological study reveals new insights into responses of chestnut (\u003cem\u003eCastanea\u003c/em\u003e spp.) to root infection by \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e. Phytopathology. 2021b;111:345\u0026ndash;55. 10. 1094/PHYTO\u0026ndash;04\u0026ndash;20\u0026ndash;0115\u0026ndash;R.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFernandes P, Pimentel D, Ramiro RS, Silva MdC, Fevereiro P, Costa RL. Dual transcriptomic analysis reveals early induced \u003cem\u003eCastanea\u003c/em\u003e defense\u0026ndash;related genes and \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e effectors. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1439380. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fpls.2024.1439380\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpls.2024.1439380\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSerrazina S, Mart\u0026iacute;nez MT, Cano V, Malh\u0026oacute; R, Costa RL, Corredoira E. Genetic transformation of \u003cem\u003eQuercus ilex\u003c/em\u003e somatic embryos with a Gnk2\u0026ndash;like protein that reveals a putative anti\u0026ndash;oomycete action. Plants. 2022;11:304. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/plants11030304\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/plants11030304\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eColavolpe MB, Vaz Dias F, Serrazina S, Malh\u0026oacute; R, Louren\u0026ccedil;o Costa R. \u003cem\u003eCastanea crenata\u003c/em\u003e Ginkbilobin\u0026ndash;2\u0026ndash;like recombinant protein reveals potential as an antimicrobial against \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e, the causal agent of ink disease in European chestnut. Forests. 2023;14:785. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/f14040785\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/f14040785\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSerrazina S, Mart\u0026iacute;nez M, Soudani S, et al. Overexpression of Ginkbilobin\u0026ndash;2 homologous domain gene improves tolerance to \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e in somatic embryos of \u003cem\u003eQuercus suber\u003c/em\u003e. Sci Rep. 2024;14:19357. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/s41598-024-70272-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41598-024-70272-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorredoira E, Valladares S, Vieitez AM, Ballester A, Chestnut. European (\u003cem\u003eCastanea sativa\u003c/em\u003e). In: Wang K, editor. Methods in Molecular Biology: \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e Protocols. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer\u0026ndash;; 2015. pp. 163\u0026ndash;76. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/978-1-4939-1658-0_14\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-1-4939-1658-0_14\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSeabra RC, Pais MS. Genetic transformation of European chestnut. Plant Cell Rep. 1998;17:177\u0026ndash;82.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorredoira E, Montenegro D, San\u0026ndash;Jos\u0026eacute; MC, Vieitez AM, Ballester A. \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e\u0026ndash;mediated transformation of European chestnut embryogenic cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 2004;23(5):311\u0026ndash;8. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s00299-004-0804-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00299-004-0804-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorredoira E, San\u0026ndash;Jos\u0026eacute; MC, Vieitez AM, Ballester A. Improving genetic transformation of European chestnut and cryopreservation of transgenic lines. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2007;91:281\u0026ndash;8.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorredoira E, Valladares S, Allona I, Aragoncillo C, Vieitez AM, Ballester A. Genetic transformation of European chestnut somatic embryos with a native thaumatin\u0026ndash;like protein (\u003cem\u003eCsTL1\u003c/em\u003e) gene isolated from \u003cem\u003eCastanea sativa\u003c/em\u003e seeds. Tree Physiol. 2012;32(11):1389\u0026ndash;402. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1093/treephys/tps098\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/treephys/tps098\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorredoira E, San Jos\u0026eacute; MC, Vieitez AM, Allona I, Aragoncillo C, Ballester A. Agrobacterium\u0026ndash;mediated transformation of European chestnut somatic embryos with a \u003cem\u003eCastanea sativa\u003c/em\u003e (Mill.) endochitinase gene. New For. 2016;47:669\u0026ndash;84. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11056-016-9537-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11056-016-9537-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMiyakawa T, Hatano K, Miyauchi Y, Suwa Y, Sawano Y, Tanokura M. Secreted protein with plant\u0026ndash;specific cysteine\u0026ndash;rich motif functions as a mannose\u0026ndash;binding lectin that exhibits antifungal activity. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(2):766\u0026ndash;78. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1104/pp.114.242636\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1104/pp.114.242636\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMurashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant. 1962;15:473\u0026ndash;97.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen DW, Zentmyer GA. Production of sporangia by \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e in axenic culture. Mycologia. 1970;62(2):397\u0026ndash;402.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eByrt PN, Holland AA. Infection of axenic \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e seedlings with \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e zoospores. Aust J Bot. 1978;26(2):169\u0026ndash;76.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eByrt P, Grant BR. Some conditions governing zoospore production in axenic cultures of \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e Rands. Aust J Bot. 1979;27(2):103\u0026ndash;15.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDel Castillo\u0026ndash;Gonz\u0026aacute;lez L, Soudani S, De La Cruz\u0026ndash;G\u0026oacute;mez N, Manzanera JA, Berrocal\u0026ndash;Lobo M. An improved method to study \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e Rands zoospores interactions with host. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):508. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/s12870-024-05205-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12870-024-05205-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKarimi M, Inz\u0026eacute; D, Depicker A. GATEWAY\u0026trade; vectors for \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:193\u0026ndash;5. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02251-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02251-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHood EE, Gelvin SB, Melchers LS, Hoekema A. New Agrobacterium helper plasmids for gene transfer to plants. Transgenic Res. 1993;2:208\u0026ndash;18. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/BF01977351\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/BF01977351\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXu R, Li QQ, Protocol. Streamline cloning of genes into binary vectors in Agrobacterium via the Gateway\u0026ndash;TOPO vector system. Plant Methods. 2008;4:4. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/1746-4811-4-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/1746-4811-4-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSong P, Cai C, Skokut M, Kosegi BD, Petolino JF. Quantitative real\u0026ndash;time PCR as a screening tool for estimating transgene copy number in WHISKERS\u0026trade;\u0026ndash;derived transgenic maize. Plant Cell Rep. 2002;20:948\u0026ndash;54. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s00299-001-0432-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00299-001-0432-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBianco L, Fontana P, Marchesini A, et al. The de novo, chromosome\u0026ndash;level genome assembly of the sweet chestnut (\u003cem\u003eCastanea sativa\u003c/em\u003e Mill.) cv. Marrone Di Chiusa Pesio. BMC Genom Data. 2024;25:64. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/s12863-024-01245-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12863-024-01245-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F, Vandesompele J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real\u0026ndash;time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol. 2007;8(2):R19. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorredoira E, Valladares S, Vieitez AM, Ballester A. Improved germination of somatic embryos and plant recovery of European chestnut. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2008;44, 307\u0026ndash;315 (2008). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-008-9105-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11627-008-9105-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGresshoff PM, Doy CH. Development and differentiation of haploid \u003cem\u003eLycopersicon esculentum\u003c/em\u003e. Planta. 1972;107:161\u0026ndash;70.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEPPO Bulletin. EPPO standards diagnostic protocols for regulated pests. 2004;34:155\u0026ndash;7.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSoudani S, Poza-Carri\u0026oacute;n C, De la Cruz G\u0026oacute;mez N, Gonz\u0026aacute;lez-Coloma A, Andr\u0026eacute;s MF, Berrocal-Lobo M. Essential Oils Prime Epigenetic and Metabolomic Changes in Tomato Defense Against \u003cem\u003eFusarium oxysporum\u003c/em\u003e. Front Plant Sci. 2002;13:804104. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.80410\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpls.2022.80410\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFern\u0026aacute;ndez\u0026ndash;Bautista N, Dom\u0026iacute;nguez\u0026ndash;N\u0026uacute;\u0026ntilde;ez JA, Moreno MMC, Berrocal\u0026ndash;Lobo M. Plant tissue trypan blue staining during phytopathogen infection. Bio\u0026ndash;protocol. 2016;6(24):e2078\u0026ndash;2078.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDel Castillo\u0026ndash;Gonz\u0026aacute;lez L, Poza\u0026ndash;Carri\u0026oacute;n C, Soudani S, De la Cruz\u0026ndash;G\u0026oacute;mez N, Andr\u0026eacute;s MF, Gonz\u0026aacute;lez\u0026ndash;Coloma A, Manzanera JA, Berrocal\u0026ndash;Lobo M. The first molecular characterization of \u003cem\u003eSolanum lycopersicum\u003c/em\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e phytopathosystem: the essential role of pectin. Phytopathology. 2025;115(6):618\u0026ndash;33.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAli S, Ganai BA, Kamili AN, Bhat AA, Mir ZA, Bhat JA, Tyagi A, Islam ST, Mushtaq M, Yadav P, Rawat S, Grover A. Pathogenesis\u0026ndash;related proteins and peptides as promising tools for engineering plants with multiple stress tolerance. Microbiol Res. 2018;212\u0026ndash;213:29\u0026ndash;37. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.micres.2018.04.008\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.micres.2018.04.008\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDąbrowska E. Genetic engineering for enhanced disease resistance in plants. J Agric Sci Bot. 2024;8(4):249.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChiu T, Poucet T, Li Y. The potential of plant proteins as antifungal agents for agricultural applications. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2022;7(4):1075\u0026ndash;83. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.synbio.2022.06.009\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.synbio.2022.06.009\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAndrade GM, Nairn CJ, Le HT, Merkle SA. Sexually mature transgenic American chestnut trees via embryogenic suspension\u0026ndash;based transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 2009;28:1385\u0026ndash;97.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMall\u0026oacute;n R, Valladares S, Corredoira E, Vieitez AM, Vidal N. Overexpression of the chestnut CsTL1 gene coding for a thaumatin\u0026ndash;like protein in somatic embryos of \u003cem\u003eQuercus robur\u003c/em\u003e. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014;116:141\u0026ndash;51. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11240-013-0390-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11240-013-0390-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHaseloff J, Amos B. GFP in plants. Trends Genet. 1995;11:328\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYancheva SD, Shlizerman LA, Golubowicz S, Yabloviz Z, Perl A, Hanania U, Flaishman MA. The use of green fluorescent protein (GFP) improves \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e\u0026ndash;mediated transformation of \u0026lsquo;Spadona\u0026rsquo; pear (\u003cem\u003ePyrus communis\u003c/em\u003e L). Plant Cell Rep. 2006;25:183\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeclercq J, Lardet L, Martin F, Chapuset T, Oliver G, Montoro P. The green fluorescent protein as an efficient selection marker for \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium tumefaciens\u003c/em\u003e\u0026ndash;mediated transformation in \u003cem\u003eHevea brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e (M\u0026uuml;ll. Arg). Plant Cell Rep. 2010;29:513\u0026ndash;22.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCano V, Mart\u0026iacute;nez MT, San Jos\u0026eacute; MC, Couselo JL, Varas E, Bouza\u0026ndash;Morcillo L, Toribio M, Corredoira E. Regeneration of transgenic plants by \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e\u0026ndash;mediated transformation of \u003cem\u003eQuercus ilex\u003c/em\u003e L. somatic embryos with the gene \u003cem\u003eCsTL1\u003c/em\u003e. New For. 2020;51:1003\u0026ndash;1021. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11056-020-09771-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11056-020-09771-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCano V, Mart\u0026iacute;nez MT, Couselo JL, Varas E, Vieitez FJ, Corredoira E. Efficient transformation of somatic embryos and regeneration of cork oak plantlets with a gene (\u003cem\u003eCsTL1\u003c/em\u003e) encoding a chestnut thaumatin\u0026ndash;like protein. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1757. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/ijms22041757\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/ijms22041757\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorredoira E, Merkle SA, Mart\u0026iacute;nez MT, Toribio M, Canhoto JM, Correia SI, Ballester A, Vieitez AM. Non\u0026ndash;zygotic embryogenesis in hardwood species. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2019;38:29\u0026ndash;97. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/07352689.2018.1551122\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/07352689.2018.1551122\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUrtubia C, Devia J, Castro A, Zamora P, Aguirre C, Tapia E, Barba P, Dell\u0026rsquo;Orto P, Moynihan MR, Petri C, et al. Agrobacterium\u0026ndash;mediated genetic transformation of \u003cem\u003ePrunus salicina\u003c/em\u003e. Plant Cell Rep. 2008;27:1333\u0026ndash;40. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s00299-008-0559-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00299-008-0559-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePalomo\u0026ndash;R\u0026iacute;os E, Cerezo S, Mercado JA, Pliego\u0026ndash;Alfaro F. Agrobacterium\u0026ndash;mediated transformation of avocado (\u003cem\u003ePersea americana\u003c/em\u003e Mill.) somatic embryos with fluorescent marker genes and optimization of transgenic plant recovery. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016;128:447\u0026ndash;55. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-1122-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11240-016-1122-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMaynard CA, Powell WA, Polin-McGuigan LD, Vi\u0026eacute;itez AM, Ballester A, Corredoira E, Merkle SA. Chestnut. Compendium of Transgenic Crop Plants. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley; 2008. pp. 169\u0026ndash;92.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDe Buck S, De Paepe A, Depicker A. Transgene expression in plants, control of. In: Christou P, et al. editors. Sustainable Food Production. Springer; 2013. pp. 1570\u0026ndash;93. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_412\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_412\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eP\u0026eacute;rez\u0026ndash;Jim\u0026eacute;nez M, P\u0026eacute;rez\u0026ndash;Tornero O. In in Vitro plant evaluation trial: reliability test of salinity assays in \u003cem\u003eCitrus\u003c/em\u003e plants. Plants. 2020;9(10):1352.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWijerathna\u0026ndash;Yapa A, Hiti\u0026ndash;Bandaralage J. Tissue culture\u0026ndash;A sustainable approach to explore plant stresses. Life (Basel). 2023;13(3):780. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/life13030780\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/life13030780\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu J, Tian H, Wang Y, Guo A. Overexpression of a novel antifungal protein gene GNK2\u0026ndash;1 results in elevated resistance of transgenic cucumber to Fusarium oxysporum. Chin Bull Bot. 2010;45:411\u0026ndash;8.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVan Holle S, Van Damme EJM. Signaling through plant lectins: modulation of plant immunity and beyond. Biochem Soc Trans. 2018;46(2):217\u0026ndash;33. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1042/BST20170371\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1042/BST20170371\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFarvardin A, Gonz\u0026aacute;lez\u0026ndash;Hern\u0026aacute;ndez AI, Llorens E, Cama\u0026ntilde;es G, Scalschi L, Vicedo B. The dual role of antimicrobial proteins and peptides: exploring their direct impact and plant defense\u0026ndash;enhancing abilities. Plants. 2024;13:2059. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/plants13152059\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/plants13152059\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHwang IS, Hwang BK. The pepper mannose\u0026ndash;binding lectin gene CaMBL1 is required to regulate cell death and defense responses to microbial pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2011;155(1):447\u0026ndash;63. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1104/pp.110.164848\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1104/pp.110.164848\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYue ZL, Tian ZJ, Zhang JW, Zhang SW, Li YD, Wu ZM. Overexpression of Lectin Receptor\u0026ndash;Like Kinase 1 in tomato confers resistance to \u003cem\u003eFusarium oxysporum\u003c/em\u003e f. sp. radicis\u0026ndash;lycopersici. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:836269. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fpls.2022.836269\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpls.2022.836269\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePeng X, Li Y, Xu J, Zeng Y, Li K, Guo X, Zhang Z, Tang X, Wang M. Overexpression of the lectin receptor\u0026ndash;like kinase gene OsLecRK\u0026ndash;S.7 inhibits plant growth and enhances disease resistance in rice. Plant Sci. 2025;356:112517. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.plantsci.2025.112517\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.plantsci.2025.112517\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"bmc-genomics","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"gics","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Genomics](http://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/gics","title":"BMC Genomics","twitterHandle":"#BMCGenomics","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Castanea sativa, Cysteine-rich repeat secretory protein, Genetic transformation, In vitro tolerance assays, Ink disease, Somatic embryos","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7973831/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7973831/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCastanea sativa\u003c/em\u003e, a species of high ecological and economic relevance in Europe, faces severe threats from root rot caused by \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e. To explore genetic strategies for enhancing disease tolerance, we investigated the functional role of a chestnut gene homologous to \u003cem\u003eGinkgo biloba\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rsquo;s ginkbilobin-2 (\u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e), known for its antifungal properties. Using \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium tumefaciens\u003c/em\u003e-mediated transformation, the \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e gene was introduced into somatic embryos from two embryogenic chestnut lines. Transformation efficiency was genotype-dependent, and varied from 14.2% to 2.5%. Twelve independent transgenic lines were confirmed by PCR, and each was estimated to carry a single copy of the transgene. Gene expression analysis revealed significant \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e transcript levels in two transgenic lines. Following cold storage and germination treatment, viable transgenic plants were regenerated. Disease tolerance assays demonstrated that \u003cem\u003eCast_Gnk2-like\u003c/em\u003e overexpression significantly reduced root necrosis and symptom severity, indicating enhanced tolerance to \u003cem\u003eP. cinnamomi\u003c/em\u003e. These findings highlight the potential of targeted gene overexpression to improve disease resilience in chestnut through genetic engineering.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Overexpression of Ginkbilobin-2 homologous domain gene to enhance the tolerance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in plants of European chestnut","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-11-17 10:13:32","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7973831/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-12-15T20:07:01+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-12-15T09:56:09+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"261970352866778896124873094230253101980","date":"2025-11-24T12:23:15+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-11-19T16:53:04+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"151700879816251635014496533996170432280","date":"2025-11-07T03:49:42+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-11-06T09:22:03+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-11-05T16:05:12+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-11-04T21:39:17+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"BMC Genomics","date":"2025-11-04T21:28:05+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"bmc-genomics","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"gics","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Genomics](http://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/gics","title":"BMC Genomics","twitterHandle":"#BMCGenomics","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"213760b6-e1d6-44f5-b624-a4f6aabe0bea","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 17th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-01-12T16:03:30+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-7973831","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-12485-x","journal":{"identity":"bmc-genomics","isVorOnly":false,"title":"BMC Genomics"},"publishedOn":"2026-01-09 15:58:10","publishedOnDateReadable":"January 9th, 2026"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-11-17 10:13:32","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s12864-025-12485-x","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-12485-x","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7973831","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7973831","identity":"rs-7973831","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.