Hierarchical Machine Learning Uncovers Topological Signatures of Autophagy Regulation by Oral Bacteria in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,854 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) progression has been increasingly linked to dysbiosis of the oral microbiome. We hypothesized that pathogenic versus commensal bacteria differentially rewire host autophagy networks to either promote or inhibit OSCC progression. To test this, we constructed host–bacterium autophagy interactomes from KEGG, STRING, and curated databases, identifying key network hubs (e.g., MAPK1, STAT3) via graph-theoretic metrics. We then applied a hierarchical unsupervised machine learning pipeline, combining two-stage principal component analysis with permutation testing and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), to interrogate differences in network topology. This multi-layer approach revealed a clear separation between pro-cancer (pathogenic) and anti-cancer (commensal) bacterial network signatures, with Fusobacterium nucleatum and Streptococcus mitis emerging as dominant global outliers. Pathogenic taxa activated inflammatory–metabolic autophagy signatures (e.g., NFKB1, MYC, ACACA), whereas commensals stabilized kinase–homeostasis signaling (EGFR, PTEN, HSP90AA1). Permutation testing confirmed that these network differences were highly significant and non-random (p < 0.001). We also derived a Dysbiosis Index that robustly distinguished the pro- versus anti-cancer bacterial cohorts with high predictive power. Collectively, our findings highlight oral microbiota–autophagy network topologies as potential biomarkers of OSCC dysbiosis and as novel therapeutic targets. Lay summary Healthy mouth bacteria help cells stay balanced and protected. When harmful bacteria take over, they disrupt cell recycling (autophagy), increase inflammation, and causing cells to become more aggressive, which can promote oral cancer development. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00