Faculty Opinions recommendation of Once daily oral relugolix combination therapy versus placebo in patients with endometriosis-associated pain: two replicate phase 3, randomised, double-blind, studies (SPIRIT 1 and 2).
Relugolix combination therapy significantly reduced endometriosis-associated dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain compared to placebo in two phase 3 trials.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper reports two replicate phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (SPIRIT 1 and 2) evaluating once-daily oral relugolix combination therapy (relugolix plus estradiol and norethisterone acetate) versus placebo, and versus delayed-start relugolix combination therapy, in women aged 18–50 years with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. Across 219 centres, participants were treated for 24 weeks and co-primary outcomes were week-24 responder rates for dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain based on NRS scores and analgesic use. In both trials, relugolix combination therapy significantly improved dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain responder rates versus placebo, with common adverse events including headache, nasopharyngitis, and hot flushes; least squares mean lumbar spine bone mineral density declined more with combination therapy than placebo, and suicidal ideation reports occurred across groups, though no deaths were reported. The main limitation explicitly noted is that post-treatment safety follow-up for bone mineral density and menses recovery was ongoing at the time of publication. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it is a phase 3 RCT showing improved endometriosis-associated pain with once-daily relugolix combination therapy.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
11,497 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Methods
Methods
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00