XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

The XENOBREAST trial prospectively assessed the feasibility of establishing patient-derived xenografts from primary or metastatic triple negative or luminal B breast cancer surgical specimens.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

The XENOBREAST trial is a prospective study designed to establish patient-derived xenograft models from surgical specimens of breast cancer, enrolling both triple-negative and luminal B subtypes. The study’s key aim is procedural feasibility and success of xenograft establishment using tissue collected at surgery, with ongoing tracking of outcomes in the xenograft workflow. A major limitation is that the provided text does not include detailed results, sample numbers, xenograft take rates, or explicit caveats about representativeness or technical failure modes. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) can be used to explore tumour pathophysiology and could be useful to better understand therapeutic response in breast cancer. PDX from mammary tumours are usually made from metastatic tumours. Thus, PDX from primary mammary tumours or after neoadjuvant treatment are still rare. This study aims to assess the feasibility to establish xenografts from tumour samples of patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer in neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. Methods: : XENOBREAST is a single-centre and prospective study. This feasibility pilot trial aims to produce xenografts from tumour samples of patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer. Patient enrolment is expected to take 3 years: 85 patients will be enrolled and followed for 28 months. Additional blood samples will be taken as part of the study. Surgical specimens from post-NAC surgery, primary surgery or surgical excision of the metastases will be collected to establish PDX. Histomolecular characteristics of the established PDX will be investigated and compared with the initial histomolecular profile of the collected tumours to ensure that they are well-established. Ethics and dissemination: XENOBREAST belongs to category 2 interventional research on the human person. This study has been approved by the Sud Méditerranée IV – Montpellier ethics committee. It is conducted notably in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Study data and findings will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals. We also plan to present the study and all data at national congresses and conferences. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04133077 ; registered on October 21, 2019.
Full text 160,914 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219" }, "headline": "XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with...", "datePublished": "2020-10-09T13:22:55", "dateModified": "2021-06-21T10:20:01", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Hugo Veyssière" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Judith Passildas" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Angeline Ginzac" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Sejdi Lusho" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Yannick Bidet" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Ioana Molnar" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Maureen Bernadach" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Mathias Cavaille" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Nina Radosevic-Robin" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Xavier Durando" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": "Introduction: Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) can be used to explore tumour pathophysiology and could be useful to better understand therapeutic response in breast cancer. PDX from mammary tumours are usually made from metastatic tumours. Thus, PDX from primary mammary tumours or after neoadjuvant treatment are still rare. This study aims to assess the feasibility to establish xenografts from tumour samples of patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer in neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. Methods: XENOBREAST is a single-centre and prospective study. This feasibility pilot trial aims to produce xenografts from tumour samples of patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer. Patient enrolment is expected to take 3 years: 85 patients will be enrolled and followed for 28 months. Additional blood samples will be taken as part of the study. Surgical specimens from post-NAC surgery, primary surgery or surgical excision of the metastases will be collected to establish PDX. Histomolecular characteristics of the established PDX will be investigated and compared with the initial histomolecular profile of the collected tumours to ensure that they are well-established. Ethics and dissemination: XENOBREAST belongs to category 2 interventional research on the human person. This study has been approved by the Sud Méditerranée IV – Montpellier ethics committee. It is conducted notably in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Study data and findings will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals. We also plan to present the study and all data at national congresses and conferences. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04133077; registered on October 21, 2019." } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219", "name": "XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment..." } } ] } Home Browse XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Veyssière H, Passildas J, Ginzac A et al. XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26873.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Study Protocol Revised XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] Hugo Veyssière https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2202-7362 1-3 , Judith Passildas 1-3 , Angeline Ginzac https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5614-0876 1-3 , [...] Sejdi Lusho 1-3 , Yannick Bidet https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-8195 1,4 , Ioana Molnar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5114-2648 1-3 , Maureen Bernadach https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-0809 1-3,5 , Mathias Cavaille 1,4 , Nina Radosevic-Robin 1,6 , Xavier Durando https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6035-3172 1-3,5 Hugo Veyssière https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2202-7362 1-3 , Judith Passildas 1-3 , [...] Angeline Ginzac https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5614-0876 1-3 , Sejdi Lusho 1-3 , Yannick Bidet https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-8195 1,4 , Ioana Molnar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5114-2648 1-3 , Maureen Bernadach https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-0809 1-3,5 , Mathias Cavaille 1,4 , Nina Radosevic-Robin 1,6 , Xavier Durando https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6035-3172 1-3,5 PUBLISHED 21 Jun 2021 Author details Author details 1 Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM UMR 1240 « Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques », Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 2 Division de Recherche Clinique, Délégation Recherche Clinique & Innovation, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 3 Centre d’Investigation Clinique, UMR501, F-63001, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 4 Département d’oncogénétique, Laboratoire d'Oncologie Moléculaire, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 5 Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 6 Département d’anatomie et de cytologie pathologiques, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France Hugo Veyssière Roles: Writing – Original Draft Preparation Judith Passildas Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration Angeline Ginzac Roles: Writing – Review & Editing Sejdi Lusho Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing Yannick Bidet Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing Ioana Molnar Roles: Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing Maureen Bernadach Roles: Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing Mathias Cavaille Roles: Investigation Nina Radosevic-Robin Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing Xavier Durando Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the Oncology gateway. Abstract Introduction: Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) can be used to explore tumour pathophysiology and could be useful to better understand therapeutic response in breast cancer. PDX from mammary tumours are usually made from metastatic tumours. Thus, PDX from primary mammary tumours or after neoadjuvant treatment are still rare. This study aims to assess the feasibility to establish xenografts from tumour samples of patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer in neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. Methods: XENOBREAST is a single-centre and prospective study. This feasibility pilot trial aims to produce xenografts from tumour samples of patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer. Patient enrolment is expected to take 3 years: 85 patients will be enrolled and followed for 28 months. Additional blood samples will be taken as part of the study. Surgical specimens from post-NAC surgery, primary surgery or surgical excision of the metastases will be collected to establish PDX. Histomolecular characteristics of the established PDX will be investigated and compared with the initial histomolecular profile of the collected tumours to ensure that they are well-established. Ethics and dissemination: XENOBREAST belongs to category 2 interventional research on the human person. This study has been approved by the Sud Méditerranée IV – Montpellier ethics committee. It is conducted notably in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Study data and findings will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals. We also plan to present the study and all data at national congresses and conferences. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04133077 ; registered on October 21, 2019. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Patient-Derived Xenografts, Triple negative breast cancer, Luminal B breast cancer, Interventional research Corresponding Author(s) Hugo Veyssière ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Hugo Veyssière Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2021 Veyssière H et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Veyssière H, Passildas J, Ginzac A et al. XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26873.3 ) First published: 09 Oct 2020, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26873.1 ) Latest published: 21 Jun 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26873.3 ) Revised Amendments from Version 2 We added relevant literature in the introduction section. We also cited five new references: Bruna et al. (2016) (PMID: 27641504), DeRose et al. (2011) (PMID: 22019887), Sachs et al. (2018) (PMID: 29224780), Rosenbluth et al. (2020) (PMID: 32249764) Ben-David et al . (2017) (PMID: 28991255). Some details have been added about the PDXs commercialization and production We added relevant literature in the introduction section. We also cited five new references: Bruna et al. (2016) (PMID: 27641504), DeRose et al. (2011) (PMID: 22019887), Sachs et al. (2018) (PMID: 29224780), Rosenbluth et al. (2020) (PMID: 32249764) Ben-David et al . (2017) (PMID: 28991255). Some details have been added about the PDXs commercialization and production See the authors' detailed response to the review by Fares Al-Ejeh See the authors' detailed response to the review by Jessica Finlay-Schultz READ REVIEWER RESPONSES Introduction Breast cancer can be classified into different molecular subtypes according to gene expression: luminal A (Hormone Receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-), with high HR expression and low levels of the protein Ki-67), luminal B (HR+ either HER2+ or HER2- with high levels of Ki-67 and with low HR expression), HER2-enriched (amplification of ERBB2 gene, regardless of HR status) and triple-negative (HR-/HER2-). Luminal B and triple-negative tumours account respectively for approximately 20% and 10–15% of all breast cancers 1 – 3 . Although rarer than luminal A breast cancers, luminal B and triple-negative tumours are often high-grade tumours with a poorer prognosis 1 . The establishment of patient derived xenografts (PDX) could be useful to discover new treatments and strategies needed in the fight against these subtypes of breast cancer. PDX are derived from tumour tissue in which the tumour architecture and the proportion of cancer and stromal cells are both maintained: advantages not found in cell lines. Therefore, PDX effectively model intra- and inter-tumoural heterogeneity 4 , 5 . It is important to note that PDXs have been shown to undergo mouse-specific tumour evolution 6 . Thus, PDX are used to answer questions such as the contribution of tumour heterogeneity to therapeutic response, patterns of tumour progression during metastatic progression and mechanisms of treatment resistance 7 , 8 . Most of the available PDX or organoids, which have been xenografted into mice and recapitulate the primary tumours, are generated from primary breast cancer tissue 5 , 9 – 11 . In contrast, generated PDX from metastatic tumours remain rarer and may allow the identification of eventual molecular therapeutic targets in metastatic setting. It is also necessary to have PDX models from primary breast lesions that are resistant to neoadjuvant therapies. Recent prospective studies show that PDX can be obtained from neoadjuvant breast tumours and demonstrate the feasibility of tumour sequencing in these situations 12 , 13 . Breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have an increased risk of recurrence. Similarly, high-grade breast tumours treated by primary surgery are very rare, poorly known, and aggressive. The production of PDX from post-NAC residual breast tumours or from high-grade breast tumours will provide data on the molecular characteristics of these tumours with a high risk of recurrence. In this study, we want to establish PDX from tumour samples of patients with triple-negative and luminal B breast cancers in neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic settings. In addition, to verify whether or not the PDX obtained is consistent with the original tumour, we will study the tumour exomes of both the PDX and the original tumour. The study of the patients’ constitutional exome will serve as the basis for this comparison and is an essential element in the overall somatic analysis. Methods Study design This is a single-centre prospective trial designed to establish xenografts from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer in neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. Patient enrolment is expected to take 3 years: 85 patients will be enrolled and followed during 28 months. Study design is presented in Figure 1 . The management of patients in the study may vary depending on the setting: neo-adjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic. In all the settings and as a part of their medical follow-up, patients will go through a pre-operative biological assessment. For patients in metastatic setting, this assessment will be performed before surgical excision of the metastases. Blood samples will be used to perform sequencing of the patient's constitutional exome. At the end of the surgery, one sample of the surgical specimen will be taken to generate PDX and another one to sequence the patient's tumour exome. Figure 1. Design of the XENOBREAST study. Adult women with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer in neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting will be included. In all the settings, patients will go through a pre-operative biological assessment. Blood samples will be used to perform sequencing of the patient's constitutional exome. At the end of the surgery (post-NAC surgery, primary surgery or surgical excision of the metastases), a sample of the surgical specimen will be taken to generate patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and another one to sequence the patient's tumour exome. Participants can withdraw at any time. Data obtained will be retained with consent, and any reasons given for withdrawal will be recorded. PDX generation The patient-derived tumour xenograft platform called XenTech will generate the PDX. All PDX will be established as approved by the ethical authorisation #16569: « Développement d’une collection de modèles de tumeurs humaines greffés sur souris (PDX) ». The different steps of the development of an established xenograft model are summarized in Figure 2 . Overall, fresh surgical tissue will be cut into small fragments and grafted into the inter-scapular region or into the renal capsule of 6- to 13-week-old female immunodeficient or severe-combined immuno-deficiency (SCID) or non-obese diabetic SCID mice. The inter-scapular site allows easy access to a well vascularized region with tissue that in female mice is in continuity with the mammary gland. Although the use of extracellular matrix tends to increase xenograft take rates, tumor fragments will be implanted without any matrix. Mice should weigh 18g at 6 months. At the onset of tumour growth, a latency period of 1 to 9 months is expected. The mouse generation with the patient derived graft will be called F0 and the following generations will be numbered F1, F2, and F3. When the tumour volume reaches the ethical limit (10% of the total weight of the mouse), the tumour is removed and fragmented as follows: a part is grafted to a new set of mice; a second part is fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin for histological studies; a third part is frozen in liquid nitrogen for molecular studies; and a last part is frozen in a 10% DMSO solution to generate a viable tissue stock. These steps are repeated for the F1, F2 and F3 generation. A xenograft will be considered as well-established in the third generation (F3). When it is necessary, the animal will be sacrificed by cervical dislocation. For the duration of the study, mice will be housed, by a maximum of 6, in individually ventilated cages. They will be housed in a light-dark cycle with temperature and hygrometry control. The mice will have throughout the duration of the project a complete diet and drinking water. For the ER+ PDX models, mice will receive 17β-estradiol supplementation in the drinking water, useful for the establishment of these models 14 . No estrogen pellets will be implanted. Figure 2. Scheme summarizing the different steps from the patient's surgery to the generation of an established patient-derived xenografts (PDX) model. Fresh surgical tissue will be grafted into the inter-scapular region or into the renal capsule of immunodeficient or severe-combined immuno-deficiency mice. When the tumour volume reaches the ethical limit, the tumour is removed and fragmented as follows: a part is grafted to a new set of mice; a second part is fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin for histological studies; a third part is frozen in liquid nitrogen for molecular studies; and a last part is frozen in a 10% DMSO solution to generate a viable tissue stock. These steps are repeated for the F1, F2 and F3 generation. A xenograft will be considered as well-established in the third generation (F3). Sample selection Inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in Table 1 . Briefly, adult women (18 years or older) with triple-negative or luminal B breast cancer in neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting will be included. Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria • Female • Age ≥ 18 years • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status ≤ 2 • Women with : ○ high grade metaplastic triple-negative (TN) breast cancer, histologically proven before treatment, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and having, after treatment, a breast residue of at least 15 mm on the specimen. The mammary residue will measure at least 15 mm on the mammography performed at the end of neoadjuvant treatment OR ○ high grade metaplastic triple-negative (TN) breast cancer, histologically proven before treatment, treated by primary surgery with a tumour size of at least 15 mm on the specimen OR ○ inflammatory TN breast cancer (T4d), histologically proven prior to treatment, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and having, after treatment, a breast residue of at least 15 mm on the specimen. The mammary residue will measure at least 15 mm on the mammography performed at the end of the neoadjuvant treatment OR ○ TN breast cancer other than non-metaplastic or inflammatory, histologically proven prior to treatment, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and having, after treatment, a mammary residue of at least 30 mm on the specimen. The mammary residue will measure at least 15 mm on the mammography performed at the end of the neoadjuvant treatment OR ○ Luminal B breast cancer, histologically proven prior to treatment, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and having, after treatment, a mammary residue of at least 30 mm on the specimen. The mammary residue will measure at least 15 mm on the mammography performed at the end of the neoadjuvant treatment OR ○ Metastatic TN or luminal B breast cancer, histologically proven at diagnosis, with an operable metastasis and having after chemotherapy a residue of at least 10 mm on the surgical specimen. Residual metastasis will measure at least 15 mm on imaging. • Patients in a metastatic situation can be included regardless of the therapeutic line • Affiliation to social security • Signature of the participation consent of the study Exclusion criteria • Pregnant woman • Patient deprived of liberty by court or administration decision • In neoadjuvant situation: neoadjuvant treatment by radiotherapy or hormone therapy • Refusal to participate to the study Recruitment and consent Eligible patients will be offered the opportunity to participate in the study by their oncologist or their surgeon. Patients who agree to participate in this study will provide written informed consents (clinical consent and genetic consent) for enrolment. XenTech is allowed to commercialize the PDX generated in this project. The patients will be made aware of that during consent. Sample size calculation This feasibility study aims to obtain xenografts from tumours that are either rare or tumours that are resistant to treatment and therefore difficult to establish. We consider that a minimum of five successful grafts would meet this objective. Under these conditions, knowing the graft success rate specific to each histological type and the proportion of luminal B (2/3) and triple-negative breast cancers (1/3), we calculate the number of subjects required so that the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the success rate multiplied by the number of subjects is ≥5. To obtain a xenograft, the average rate is 30% from triple-negative tumours and 10% from luminal B tumours. Taking these data into account, we will include 2/3 luminal B tumours and 1/3 triple negative tumours: the expected rate of successful xenografts will be approximately 17%. The number of patients needed to be included is therefore at least 65: lower bound of the CI-95% of 17% for 65 subjects = 8% or 5 patients (8%×65=5.2). Since for some patients the tumour will be of sufficient size for imaging, but of insufficient size in the operating room, we consider that this number should be increased by 30%, to a total number of 85 patients. Study objectives and data collections The primary objective of the XENOBREAST trial is to establish xenografts from tumour samples of patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer in neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. Furthermore, the study aims to investigate histomolecular characteristics of the established PDX and to compare these characteristics with the initial histomolecular profile of the collected tumours. Data collected are the patient's age (month and year of birth), pathology, treatments received, response to treatments, date and nature of surgery (primary tumour, metastasis), data concerning exomes (constitutional and tumour), as well as histomolecular profiles of the initial tumour and of the different xenograft generations. To define these histomolecular profiles we will quantify the expression of the oestrogen, progesterone and androgen receptors by immunohistochemistry, the amplification status of the ERBB2 gene, and the fraction of tumour cells expressing Ki67. Finally, tumours will be classified into molecular classes according to the above-mentioned data: luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched or triple negative. Data collected and transmitted to the sponsor of the study by the investigators will be pseudonymized. Study data will not contain any names or other personal identifiers such as addresses. Patients included in the trial will be identified by a code specific to this trial. The investigator will have access to the correspondence table between the patient's last name, first name, date of birth and the code assigned in the trial. Statistical analysis Primary analysis. The main outcome of this feasibility trial is the number of successful xenografts obtained, a xenograft being considered successful when it reaches the F3 generation and its molecular subtype defined by immunohistochemistry has remained identical to the original tumour. The percentage of tumours yielding a successful xenograft will also be calculated, along with a 95% confidence interval. The feasibility will be considered acceptable if at least five successful transplants are obtained. Secondary analysis. A diversity analysis of genomic data from the tumour exomes and the constitutional exome will be performed. Differential analyses using bioinformatics tools adapted to these data could be envisaged if the number of patients allows it. We will describe in detail the collected tumours (description of the population, histomolecular profile, anatomopathological data, etc.). Qualitative characteristics will be described using their number and frequency, and quantitative characteristics (age at diagnosis, tumour size, etc.) using standard distribution parameters: mean, median, standard deviation, extremes, normality. The characteristics of the tumours will also be described according to whether or not a xenograft was successful. These characteristics will also be compared, if the sample sizes allow it, using Fisher’s exact test, and Welch's t-test or the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test if needed. All tests will be two-sided and the statistical significance threshold will be generally set at 0.05 except in case of differential analyses on the exome data where multiple testing corrections will be applied. Ethical considerations The XENOBREAST trial has been approved by an ethics committee (Sud Méditerranée IV – Montpellier) on April 2020 (Reference: 20 03 02 and ID-RCB number: 2020-A00398-31). It is conducted notably in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Study data and finding will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals. We plan to present the study and all data at national congresses and conferences. Trial status Participant recruitment is expected to begin in October 2020 and to finish in October 2023. The approved protocol is version 02, 24/03/2020. Conclusion The XENOBREAST study a feasibility pilot trial that will allow us to estimate the success rate of xenografts and to estimate PDX drift by comparing the histomolecular profile of the PDX to that of the tumour. In perspective, the generation of PDX from rare and chemo-resistant tumours would allow for testing new treatments before their administration in vivo . In the long term, the establishment of PDX from primary mammary tumours or after neoadjuvant treatment would allow a better understanding of the therapeutic response. Moreover, it could be a great model to explore tumour evolution patterns during metastatic progression and to observe tumour resistance mechanisms in non-metastatic tumours. Data availability No data are associated with this article. Acknowledgements The authors thank the patient-derived xenografts platform XenTech for their help in the study design and in the PDX xenografts establishment. The authors also thank the Laboratoire d’Oncogénétique of the Jean PERRIN centre of Clermont-Ferrand. Faculty Opinions recommended References 1. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al. : Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13 (15 Pt 1): 4429–4434. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 2. Prat A, Pineda E, Adamo B, et al. : Clinical implications of the intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast. 2015; 24 Suppl 2 : S26–35. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 3. Voduc KD, Cheang MCU, Tyldesley S, et al. : Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28 (10): 1684–1691. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 4. Varešlija D, Cocchiglia S, Byrne C, et al. : Patient-Derived Xenografts of Breast Cancer. In: Martin F, Stein T, Howlin J (eds). Methods Mol Biol. Springer, New York, NY. 2017; 1501 : 327–336. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 5. DeRose YS, Wang G, Lin YC, et al. : Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes. Nat Med. 2011; 17 (11): 1514–1520. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 6. Ben-David U, Ha G, Tseng YY, et al. : Patient-Derived Xenografts Undergo Mouse-Specific Tumor Evolution. Nat Genet. 2017; 49 (11): 1567–75. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 7. Byrne AT, Alférez DG, Amant F, et al. : Interrogating open issues in cancer precision medicine with patient-derived xenografts. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017; 17 (4): 254–268. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 8. Dobrolecki LE, Airhart SD, Alferez DG, et al. : Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016; 35 (4): 547–573. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 9. Bruna A, Rueda OM, Greenwood W, et al. : A Biobank of Breast Cancer Explants with Preserved Intra-tumor Heterogeneity to Screen Anticancer Compounds. Cell. 2016; 167 (1): 260–274.e22. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 10. Rosenbluth JM, Schackmann RCJ, Gray GK, et al. : Organoid Cultures from Normal and Cancer-Prone Human Breast Tissues Preserve Complex Epithelial Lineages. Nat Commun. 2020; 11 (1): 1711. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 11. Sachs N, de Ligt J, Kopper O, et al. : A Living Biobank of Breast Cancer Organoids Captures Disease Heterogeneity. Cell. 2018; 172 (1–2): 373–386.e10. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 12. Goetz MP, Kalari KR, Suman VJ, et al. : Tumor Sequencing and Patient-Derived Xenografts in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017; 109 (7): djw306. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 13. Yu J, Qin B, Moyer AM, et al. : Establishing and characterizing patient-derived xenografts using pre-chemotherapy percutaneous biopsy and post-chemotherapy surgical samples from a prospective neoadjuvant breast cancer study. Breast Cancer Res. 2017; 19 (1): 130. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 14. Kabos P, Finlay-Schultz J, Li C, et al. : Patient-derived luminal breast cancer xenografts retain hormone receptor heterogeneity and help define unique estrogen-dependent gene signatures. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 135 (2): 415–32. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 09 Oct 2020 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM UMR 1240 « Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques », Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 2 Division de Recherche Clinique, Délégation Recherche Clinique & Innovation, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 3 Centre d’Investigation Clinique, UMR501, F-63001, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 4 Département d’oncogénétique, Laboratoire d'Oncologie Moléculaire, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 5 Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 6 Département d’anatomie et de cytologie pathologiques, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France Hugo Veyssière Roles: Writing – Original Draft Preparation Judith Passildas Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration Angeline Ginzac Roles: Writing – Review & Editing Sejdi Lusho Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing Yannick Bidet Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing Ioana Molnar Roles: Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing Maureen Bernadach Roles: Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing Mathias Cavaille Roles: Investigation Nina Radosevic-Robin Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing Xavier Durando Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (3) version 3 Revised Published: 21 Jun 2021, 9:1219 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26873.3 version 2 Revised Published: 10 Mar 2021, 9:1219 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26873.2 version 1 Published: 09 Oct 2020, 9:1219 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26873.1 Copyright © 2021 Veyssière H et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Veyssière H, Passildas J, Ginzac A et al. XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26873.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 21 Jun 2021 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Al-Ejeh F. Reviewer Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.57809.r87975 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v3#referee-response-87975 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 05 Jul 2021 Fares Al-Ejeh , QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia; Qatar Biomedical Research Institute, Doha, Qatar Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.57809.r87975 The authors' revisions address the ... Continue reading READ ALL The authors' revisions address the points raised on the previous version. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Breast cancer research and translational in vitro and in vivo models, including PDXs and PDCLs. My area of research is cancer signalling and identification of biomarkers and therapeutic targets from clinical samples to investigate their role and clinical potential in preclinical models. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Al-Ejeh F. Reviewer Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.57809.r87975 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v3#referee-response-87975 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Mar 2021 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Al-Ejeh F. Reviewer Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.54662.r84566 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v2#referee-response-84566 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 28 May 2021 Fares Al-Ejeh , QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia; Qatar Biomedical Research Institute, Doha, Qatar Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.54662.r84566 In this protocol, the investigators aim to establish PDXs from the more aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, TNBC and Luminal B for future use in translational research. Overall, the protocol for the XENOBREAST study is clearly described. ... Continue reading READ ALL In this protocol, the investigators aim to establish PDXs from the more aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, TNBC and Luminal B for future use in translational research. Overall, the protocol for the XENOBREAST study is clearly described. However, some edits and inclusion of suggested literature below should be included. The abstract and the introduction makes a statement that " Most of the available PDX, derived from breast cancer, were generated from metastatic tumours. " - This is not accurate. Indeed, most of the commonly breast cancer cells lines established few decades ago were from metastases (mainly pleural effusion). In contrast, PDXs and organoids, which have been xenotransplated into mice and recapitulate the primary tumors, are more commonly derived from primary breast cancer tissue (Bruna et al. (2016 1 ), DeRose et al. (2011 2 ), Sachs et al. (2018 3 ), Rosenbluth et al. (2020 4 )). Also see the following link . This statement needs to be corrected and to cite this relevant literature. The involvement of the company XenTech, who already have established breast cancer xenografts, needs to be clarified. - Is the company only providing a service or will maintain, use and sell those established xenografts? If commercial rights are involved in favor of XenTech, it is important to state that patients will be made aware during consent. The choice of into the inter-scapular region or into the renal capsule as the injection sites are unusual (not orthotopic) for breast cancer. - PDXs have been shown to undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution (Ben-David et al . (2017 5 )), which should be noted and cited in this manuscript. The environment where PDXs are established will also have an impact on the molecular profile of the tumor, thus the choice to avoid the mammary gland to establish PDXs in this study needs to be clearly explained and justified. Moreover, it is not clear if estrogen pellets (not in the feed) will be implanted in the mice for the establishment and maintenance of luminal B PDXs. Considering the above, why is not the design considering cryopreservation of tumor pieces to store alongside the injection of some pieces into mice? This will allow the option to implant the PDXs in the mammary glands if the investigators find that the inter-scapular region and the renal capsule sites cause genetic/molecular drift in the established PDXs compared to the original tissue and during PDX passage (F0-F3). Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Partly Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable References 1. Bruna A, Rueda O, Greenwood W, Batra A, et al.: A Biobank of Breast Cancer Explants with Preserved Intra-tumor Heterogeneity to Screen Anticancer Compounds. Cell . 2016; 167 (1): 260-274.e22 Publisher Full Text 2. DeRose YS, Wang G, Lin YC, Bernard PS, et al.: Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes. Nat Med . 2011; 17 (11): 1514-20 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 3. Sachs N, de Ligt J, Kopper O, Gogola E, et al.: A Living Biobank of Breast Cancer Organoids Captures Disease Heterogeneity. Cell . 2018; 172 (1-2): 373-386.e10 Publisher Full Text 4. Rosenbluth J, Schackmann R, Gray G, Selfors L, et al.: Organoid cultures from normal and cancer-prone human breast tissues preserve complex epithelial lineages. Nature Communications . 2020; 11 (1). Publisher Full Text 5. Ben-David U, Ha G, Tseng YY, Greenwald NF, et al.: Patient-derived xenografts undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution. Nat Genet . 2017; 49 (11): 1567-1575 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Breast cancer research and translational in vitro and in vivo models, including PDXs and PDCLs. My area of research is cancer signalling and identification of biomarkers and therapeutic targets from clinical samples to investigate their role and clinical potential in preclinical models. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Al-Ejeh F. Reviewer Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.54662.r84566 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v2#referee-response-84566 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 21 Jun 2021 Hugo Veyssière , Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM UMR 1240 « Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques », Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 21 Jun 2021 Author Response Thank you for your report and comments. The abstract and the introduction make a statement that "Most of the available PDX, derived from breast cancer, were generated from metastatic ... Continue reading Thank you for your report and comments. The abstract and the introduction make a statement that "Most of the available PDX, derived from breast cancer, were generated from metastatic tumours." - This is not accurate. Indeed, most of the commonly breast cancer cells lines established few decades ago were from metastases (mainly pleural effusion). In contrast, PDXs and organoids, which have been xenotransplanted into mice and recapitulate the primary tumors, are more commonly derived from primary breast cancer tissue (Bruna et al. (2016), DeRose et al. (2011), Sachs et al. (2018), Rosenbluth et al. (2020)). Also see the following link. This statement needs to be corrected and to cite this relevant literature. Response: The statement has been modified and relevant literature is cited in the introduction. The involvement of the company XenTech, who already have established breast cancer xenografts, needs to be clarified. - Is the company only providing a service or will maintain, use and sell those established xenografts? If commercial rights are involved in favor of XenTech, it is important to state that patients will be made aware during consent. Response: XenTech may commercialize the product of its research (this sentence is present in the consent). And patients will be made aware during consent. We added a sentence in the “Recruitment and consent” paragraph: “ XenTech may commercialize the product of its research, and patients will be made aware during consent.” The choice of into the inter-scapular region or into the renal capsule as the injection sites are unusual (not orthotopic) for breast cancer. - PDXs have been shown to undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution (Ben-David et al. (20175)), which should be noted and cited in this manuscript. The environment where PDXs are established will also have an impact on the molecular profile of the tumor, thus the choice to avoid the mammary gland to establish PDXs in this study needs to be clearly explained and justified. Response: For breast cancer PDXs, the placement in the interscapular region is a choice made by Xentech when it began generating breast cancer PDXs. This implant site allows easy access to a well vascularized region with tissue that in female mice is in continuity with the mammary gland. We added a sentence in the “PDX generation” paragraph. Moreover, it is not clear if estrogen pellets (not in the feed) will be implanted in the mice for the establishment and maintenance of luminal B PDXs. Response: As mentioned in the manuscript, for the ER+ PDX models, mice will receive 17β-estradiol supplementation in the drinking water, useful for the establishment and the maintenance of these models Considering the above, why is not the design considering cryopreservation of tumor pieces to store alongside the injection of some pieces into mice? This will allow the option to implant the PDXs in the mammary glands if the investigators find that the inter-scapular region and the renal capsule sites cause genetic/molecular drift in the established PDXs compared to the original tissue and during PDX passage (F0-F3). Response: As we wrote in the manuscript, “a part is grafted to a new set of mice; a second part is fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin for histological studies; a third part is frozen in liquid nitrogen for molecular studies, and a last part is frozen in a 10% DMSO solution to generate a viable tissue stock.” Thus, we do want to have a viable tissue stock. However, because the surgical specimen will be limited we are not sure that we will have enough material to cryopreserve a part of the tumors. Thank you for your report and comments. The abstract and the introduction make a statement that "Most of the available PDX, derived from breast cancer, were generated from metastatic tumours." - This is not accurate. Indeed, most of the commonly breast cancer cells lines established few decades ago were from metastases (mainly pleural effusion). In contrast, PDXs and organoids, which have been xenotransplanted into mice and recapitulate the primary tumors, are more commonly derived from primary breast cancer tissue (Bruna et al. (2016), DeRose et al. (2011), Sachs et al. (2018), Rosenbluth et al. (2020)). Also see the following link. This statement needs to be corrected and to cite this relevant literature. Response: The statement has been modified and relevant literature is cited in the introduction. The involvement of the company XenTech, who already have established breast cancer xenografts, needs to be clarified. - Is the company only providing a service or will maintain, use and sell those established xenografts? If commercial rights are involved in favor of XenTech, it is important to state that patients will be made aware during consent. Response: XenTech may commercialize the product of its research (this sentence is present in the consent). And patients will be made aware during consent. We added a sentence in the “Recruitment and consent” paragraph: “ XenTech may commercialize the product of its research, and patients will be made aware during consent.” The choice of into the inter-scapular region or into the renal capsule as the injection sites are unusual (not orthotopic) for breast cancer. - PDXs have been shown to undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution (Ben-David et al. (20175)), which should be noted and cited in this manuscript. The environment where PDXs are established will also have an impact on the molecular profile of the tumor, thus the choice to avoid the mammary gland to establish PDXs in this study needs to be clearly explained and justified. Response: For breast cancer PDXs, the placement in the interscapular region is a choice made by Xentech when it began generating breast cancer PDXs. This implant site allows easy access to a well vascularized region with tissue that in female mice is in continuity with the mammary gland. We added a sentence in the “PDX generation” paragraph. Moreover, it is not clear if estrogen pellets (not in the feed) will be implanted in the mice for the establishment and maintenance of luminal B PDXs. Response: As mentioned in the manuscript, for the ER+ PDX models, mice will receive 17β-estradiol supplementation in the drinking water, useful for the establishment and the maintenance of these models Considering the above, why is not the design considering cryopreservation of tumor pieces to store alongside the injection of some pieces into mice? This will allow the option to implant the PDXs in the mammary glands if the investigators find that the inter-scapular region and the renal capsule sites cause genetic/molecular drift in the established PDXs compared to the original tissue and during PDX passage (F0-F3). Response: As we wrote in the manuscript, “a part is grafted to a new set of mice; a second part is fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin for histological studies; a third part is frozen in liquid nitrogen for molecular studies, and a last part is frozen in a 10% DMSO solution to generate a viable tissue stock.” Thus, we do want to have a viable tissue stock. However, because the surgical specimen will be limited we are not sure that we will have enough material to cryopreserve a part of the tumors. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 21 Jun 2021 Hugo Veyssière , Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM UMR 1240 « Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques », Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 21 Jun 2021 Author Response Thank you for your report and comments. The abstract and the introduction make a statement that "Most of the available PDX, derived from breast cancer, were generated from metastatic ... Continue reading Thank you for your report and comments. The abstract and the introduction make a statement that "Most of the available PDX, derived from breast cancer, were generated from metastatic tumours." - This is not accurate. Indeed, most of the commonly breast cancer cells lines established few decades ago were from metastases (mainly pleural effusion). In contrast, PDXs and organoids, which have been xenotransplanted into mice and recapitulate the primary tumors, are more commonly derived from primary breast cancer tissue (Bruna et al. (2016), DeRose et al. (2011), Sachs et al. (2018), Rosenbluth et al. (2020)). Also see the following link. This statement needs to be corrected and to cite this relevant literature. Response: The statement has been modified and relevant literature is cited in the introduction. The involvement of the company XenTech, who already have established breast cancer xenografts, needs to be clarified. - Is the company only providing a service or will maintain, use and sell those established xenografts? If commercial rights are involved in favor of XenTech, it is important to state that patients will be made aware during consent. Response: XenTech may commercialize the product of its research (this sentence is present in the consent). And patients will be made aware during consent. We added a sentence in the “Recruitment and consent” paragraph: “ XenTech may commercialize the product of its research, and patients will be made aware during consent.” The choice of into the inter-scapular region or into the renal capsule as the injection sites are unusual (not orthotopic) for breast cancer. - PDXs have been shown to undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution (Ben-David et al. (20175)), which should be noted and cited in this manuscript. The environment where PDXs are established will also have an impact on the molecular profile of the tumor, thus the choice to avoid the mammary gland to establish PDXs in this study needs to be clearly explained and justified. Response: For breast cancer PDXs, the placement in the interscapular region is a choice made by Xentech when it began generating breast cancer PDXs. This implant site allows easy access to a well vascularized region with tissue that in female mice is in continuity with the mammary gland. We added a sentence in the “PDX generation” paragraph. Moreover, it is not clear if estrogen pellets (not in the feed) will be implanted in the mice for the establishment and maintenance of luminal B PDXs. Response: As mentioned in the manuscript, for the ER+ PDX models, mice will receive 17β-estradiol supplementation in the drinking water, useful for the establishment and the maintenance of these models Considering the above, why is not the design considering cryopreservation of tumor pieces to store alongside the injection of some pieces into mice? This will allow the option to implant the PDXs in the mammary glands if the investigators find that the inter-scapular region and the renal capsule sites cause genetic/molecular drift in the established PDXs compared to the original tissue and during PDX passage (F0-F3). Response: As we wrote in the manuscript, “a part is grafted to a new set of mice; a second part is fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin for histological studies; a third part is frozen in liquid nitrogen for molecular studies, and a last part is frozen in a 10% DMSO solution to generate a viable tissue stock.” Thus, we do want to have a viable tissue stock. However, because the surgical specimen will be limited we are not sure that we will have enough material to cryopreserve a part of the tumors. Thank you for your report and comments. The abstract and the introduction make a statement that "Most of the available PDX, derived from breast cancer, were generated from metastatic tumours." - This is not accurate. Indeed, most of the commonly breast cancer cells lines established few decades ago were from metastases (mainly pleural effusion). In contrast, PDXs and organoids, which have been xenotransplanted into mice and recapitulate the primary tumors, are more commonly derived from primary breast cancer tissue (Bruna et al. (2016), DeRose et al. (2011), Sachs et al. (2018), Rosenbluth et al. (2020)). Also see the following link. This statement needs to be corrected and to cite this relevant literature. Response: The statement has been modified and relevant literature is cited in the introduction. The involvement of the company XenTech, who already have established breast cancer xenografts, needs to be clarified. - Is the company only providing a service or will maintain, use and sell those established xenografts? If commercial rights are involved in favor of XenTech, it is important to state that patients will be made aware during consent. Response: XenTech may commercialize the product of its research (this sentence is present in the consent). And patients will be made aware during consent. We added a sentence in the “Recruitment and consent” paragraph: “ XenTech may commercialize the product of its research, and patients will be made aware during consent.” The choice of into the inter-scapular region or into the renal capsule as the injection sites are unusual (not orthotopic) for breast cancer. - PDXs have been shown to undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution (Ben-David et al. (20175)), which should be noted and cited in this manuscript. The environment where PDXs are established will also have an impact on the molecular profile of the tumor, thus the choice to avoid the mammary gland to establish PDXs in this study needs to be clearly explained and justified. Response: For breast cancer PDXs, the placement in the interscapular region is a choice made by Xentech when it began generating breast cancer PDXs. This implant site allows easy access to a well vascularized region with tissue that in female mice is in continuity with the mammary gland. We added a sentence in the “PDX generation” paragraph. Moreover, it is not clear if estrogen pellets (not in the feed) will be implanted in the mice for the establishment and maintenance of luminal B PDXs. Response: As mentioned in the manuscript, for the ER+ PDX models, mice will receive 17β-estradiol supplementation in the drinking water, useful for the establishment and the maintenance of these models Considering the above, why is not the design considering cryopreservation of tumor pieces to store alongside the injection of some pieces into mice? This will allow the option to implant the PDXs in the mammary glands if the investigators find that the inter-scapular region and the renal capsule sites cause genetic/molecular drift in the established PDXs compared to the original tissue and during PDX passage (F0-F3). Response: As we wrote in the manuscript, “a part is grafted to a new set of mice; a second part is fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin for histological studies; a third part is frozen in liquid nitrogen for molecular studies, and a last part is frozen in a 10% DMSO solution to generate a viable tissue stock.” Thus, we do want to have a viable tissue stock. However, because the surgical specimen will be limited we are not sure that we will have enough material to cryopreserve a part of the tumors. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Finlay-Schultz J. Reviewer Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.54662.r81197 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v2#referee-response-81197 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 12 Mar 2021 Jessica Finlay-Schultz , Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80309, USA Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.54662.r81197 I have ... Continue reading READ ALL I have no further comments. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: My expertise is in the establishment and propagation of breast cancer PDX models, primarily from hormone receptor positive tumors. My area of research includes estrogen and progesterone receptor signaling, crosstalk, and transcriptional regulation in breast cancer models, including PDX and cell lines derived from primary tissue and PDX models. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Finlay-Schultz J. Reviewer Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.54662.r81197 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v2#referee-response-81197 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 09 Oct 2020 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Finlay-Schultz J. Reviewer Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.29677.r76613 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v1#referee-response-76613 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 26 Jan 2021 Jessica Finlay-Schultz , Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80309, USA Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.29677.r76613 In this manuscript, Veyssière et al. outline a study protocol for generation of PDX models from patient tumors of the triple negative or luminal B molecular subtypes. The overall study metrics and patient enrollment numbers appear sound, though the methods ... Continue reading READ ALL In this manuscript, Veyssière et al. outline a study protocol for generation of PDX models from patient tumors of the triple negative or luminal B molecular subtypes. The overall study metrics and patient enrollment numbers appear sound, though the methods are light on experimental details. The writing is clear and concise, though the phrase “primitive mammary tumours” should be replaced with “primary mammary tumours” in the Abstract. While I understand that the authors will be using a private company to generate these PDX models, some details of their generation should be included, and the group would benefit from reviewing additional established PDX generation protocols. Kabos et al. (PMID 22821401) 1 have established that supplementation with 17β-estradiol is useful for the establishment of ER+ PDX models. Is there a plan for hormone supplementation for the Luminal B portion of this study? In addition, breast cancer PDX models are often placed into the #4 mammary fat pad of these animals. Is there a specific reason behind avoiding this placement in this study? Will there be the use of an extracellular matrix for implantation of the primary tumor? While ECM use tends to increase xenograft take rates, there have been historical links between some ECM producers and the propagation of LDEV (Lactate Dehydrogenase Elevating Virus) with tumor tissues. Review and citation of Dobrolecki et al (PMID 28025748) 2 will help answer some major questions in the breast tumor PDX field, and this should be referenced in your study, as it is a comprehensive review of the majority of well-established breast tumor PDX banks. Please include that the primary molecule that differs between Luminal A and Luminal B tumors is Ki67. While Luminal B tumors may often exhibit lower HR expression, it is not the main factor used to classify these tumors. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? No Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable References 1. Kabos P, Finlay-Schultz J, Li C, Kline E, et al.: Patient-derived luminal breast cancer xenografts retain hormone receptor heterogeneity and help define unique estrogen-dependent gene signatures. Breast Cancer Res Treat . 2012; 135 (2): 415-32 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 2. Dobrolecki LE, Airhart SD, Alferez DG, Aparicio S, et al.: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research. Cancer Metastasis Rev . 35 (4): 547-573 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: My expertise is in the establishment and propagation of breast cancer PDX models, primarily from hormone receptor positive tumors. My area of research includes estrogen and progesterone receptor signaling, crosstalk, and transcriptional regulation in breast cancer models, including PDX and cell lines derived from primary tissue and PDX models. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Finlay-Schultz J. Reviewer Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.29677.r76613 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v1#referee-response-76613 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 10 Mar 2021 Hugo Veyssière , Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM UMR 1240 « Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques », Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 10 Mar 2021 Author Response Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript. We appreciate your helpful comments. 1) Kabos et al. (PMID 22821401) 1 have established that supplementation with 17β-estradiol is useful for the establishment ... Continue reading Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript. We appreciate your helpful comments. 1) Kabos et al. (PMID 22821401) 1 have established that supplementation with 17β-estradiol is useful for the establishment of ER+ PDX models. Is there a plan for hormone supplementation for the Luminal B portion of this study? All the ER+ PDX models are established in mice receiving 17β-estradiol supplementation in the drinking water. A sentence has been added in our manuscript. 2) In addition, breast cancer PDX models are often placed into the #4 mammary fat pad of these animals. Is there a specific reason behind avoiding this placement in this study? For breast cancer PDXs, the placement in the interscapular region is a choice made by Xentech when it began generating breast cancer PDXs. This implant site allows easy access to a well vascularized region with tissue that in female mice is in continuity with the mammary gland. 3) Will there be the use of an extracellular matrix for implantation of the primary tumor? While ECM use tends to increase xenograft take rates, there have been historical links between some ECM producers and the propagation of LDEV (Lactate Dehydrogenase Elevating Virus) with tumor tissues. We do not foresee the use of any matrix during the first implantation, only tumor fragments will be implanted. 4) Review and citation of Dobrolecki et al (PMID 28025748) 2 will help answer some major questions in the breast tumor PDX field, and this should be referenced in your study, as it is a comprehensive review of the majority of well-established breast tumor PDX banks. Dobrolecki et al. has been added to references. 5) Please include that the primary molecule that differs between Luminal A and Luminal B tumors is Ki67. While Luminal B tumors may often exhibit lower HR expression, it is not the main factor used to classify these tumors. Precisions have been added in the article. Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript. We appreciate your helpful comments. 1) Kabos et al. (PMID 22821401) 1 have established that supplementation with 17β-estradiol is useful for the establishment of ER+ PDX models. Is there a plan for hormone supplementation for the Luminal B portion of this study? All the ER+ PDX models are established in mice receiving 17β-estradiol supplementation in the drinking water. A sentence has been added in our manuscript. 2) In addition, breast cancer PDX models are often placed into the #4 mammary fat pad of these animals. Is there a specific reason behind avoiding this placement in this study? For breast cancer PDXs, the placement in the interscapular region is a choice made by Xentech when it began generating breast cancer PDXs. This implant site allows easy access to a well vascularized region with tissue that in female mice is in continuity with the mammary gland. 3) Will there be the use of an extracellular matrix for implantation of the primary tumor? While ECM use tends to increase xenograft take rates, there have been historical links between some ECM producers and the propagation of LDEV (Lactate Dehydrogenase Elevating Virus) with tumor tissues. We do not foresee the use of any matrix during the first implantation, only tumor fragments will be implanted. 4) Review and citation of Dobrolecki et al (PMID 28025748) 2 will help answer some major questions in the breast tumor PDX field, and this should be referenced in your study, as it is a comprehensive review of the majority of well-established breast tumor PDX banks. Dobrolecki et al. has been added to references. 5) Please include that the primary molecule that differs between Luminal A and Luminal B tumors is Ki67. While Luminal B tumors may often exhibit lower HR expression, it is not the main factor used to classify these tumors. Precisions have been added in the article. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 10 Mar 2021 Hugo Veyssière , Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM UMR 1240 « Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques », Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France 10 Mar 2021 Author Response Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript. We appreciate your helpful comments. 1) Kabos et al. (PMID 22821401) 1 have established that supplementation with 17β-estradiol is useful for the establishment ... Continue reading Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript. We appreciate your helpful comments. 1) Kabos et al. (PMID 22821401) 1 have established that supplementation with 17β-estradiol is useful for the establishment of ER+ PDX models. Is there a plan for hormone supplementation for the Luminal B portion of this study? All the ER+ PDX models are established in mice receiving 17β-estradiol supplementation in the drinking water. A sentence has been added in our manuscript. 2) In addition, breast cancer PDX models are often placed into the #4 mammary fat pad of these animals. Is there a specific reason behind avoiding this placement in this study? For breast cancer PDXs, the placement in the interscapular region is a choice made by Xentech when it began generating breast cancer PDXs. This implant site allows easy access to a well vascularized region with tissue that in female mice is in continuity with the mammary gland. 3) Will there be the use of an extracellular matrix for implantation of the primary tumor? While ECM use tends to increase xenograft take rates, there have been historical links between some ECM producers and the propagation of LDEV (Lactate Dehydrogenase Elevating Virus) with tumor tissues. We do not foresee the use of any matrix during the first implantation, only tumor fragments will be implanted. 4) Review and citation of Dobrolecki et al (PMID 28025748) 2 will help answer some major questions in the breast tumor PDX field, and this should be referenced in your study, as it is a comprehensive review of the majority of well-established breast tumor PDX banks. Dobrolecki et al. has been added to references. 5) Please include that the primary molecule that differs between Luminal A and Luminal B tumors is Ki67. While Luminal B tumors may often exhibit lower HR expression, it is not the main factor used to classify these tumors. Precisions have been added in the article. Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript. We appreciate your helpful comments. 1) Kabos et al. (PMID 22821401) 1 have established that supplementation with 17β-estradiol is useful for the establishment of ER+ PDX models. Is there a plan for hormone supplementation for the Luminal B portion of this study? All the ER+ PDX models are established in mice receiving 17β-estradiol supplementation in the drinking water. A sentence has been added in our manuscript. 2) In addition, breast cancer PDX models are often placed into the #4 mammary fat pad of these animals. Is there a specific reason behind avoiding this placement in this study? For breast cancer PDXs, the placement in the interscapular region is a choice made by Xentech when it began generating breast cancer PDXs. This implant site allows easy access to a well vascularized region with tissue that in female mice is in continuity with the mammary gland. 3) Will there be the use of an extracellular matrix for implantation of the primary tumor? While ECM use tends to increase xenograft take rates, there have been historical links between some ECM producers and the propagation of LDEV (Lactate Dehydrogenase Elevating Virus) with tumor tissues. We do not foresee the use of any matrix during the first implantation, only tumor fragments will be implanted. 4) Review and citation of Dobrolecki et al (PMID 28025748) 2 will help answer some major questions in the breast tumor PDX field, and this should be referenced in your study, as it is a comprehensive review of the majority of well-established breast tumor PDX banks. Dobrolecki et al. has been added to references. 5) Please include that the primary molecule that differs between Luminal A and Luminal B tumors is Ki67. While Luminal B tumors may often exhibit lower HR expression, it is not the main factor used to classify these tumors. Precisions have been added in the article. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 09 Oct 2020 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 Version 3 (revision) 21 Jun 21 read Version 2 (revision) 10 Mar 21 read read Version 1 09 Oct 20 read Jessica Finlay-Schultz , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA Fares Al-Ejeh , QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Australia; Qatar Biomedical Research Institute, Doha, Qatar Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2021 Al-Ejeh F. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 05 Jul 2021 | for Version 3 Fares Al-Ejeh , QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia; Qatar Biomedical Research Institute, Doha, Qatar 0 Views copyright © 2021 Al-Ejeh F. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The authors' revisions address the points raised on the previous version. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Breast cancer research and translational in vitro and in vivo models, including PDXs and PDCLs. My area of research is cancer signalling and identification of biomarkers and therapeutic targets from clinical samples to investigate their role and clinical potential in preclinical models. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Al-Ejeh F. Peer Review Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.57809.r87975) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v3#referee-response-87975 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2021 Al-Ejeh F. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 28 May 2021 | for Version 2 Fares Al-Ejeh , QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia; Qatar Biomedical Research Institute, Doha, Qatar 0 Views copyright © 2021 Al-Ejeh F. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions In this protocol, the investigators aim to establish PDXs from the more aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, TNBC and Luminal B for future use in translational research. Overall, the protocol for the XENOBREAST study is clearly described. However, some edits and inclusion of suggested literature below should be included. The abstract and the introduction makes a statement that " Most of the available PDX, derived from breast cancer, were generated from metastatic tumours. " - This is not accurate. Indeed, most of the commonly breast cancer cells lines established few decades ago were from metastases (mainly pleural effusion). In contrast, PDXs and organoids, which have been xenotransplated into mice and recapitulate the primary tumors, are more commonly derived from primary breast cancer tissue (Bruna et al. (2016 1 ), DeRose et al. (2011 2 ), Sachs et al. (2018 3 ), Rosenbluth et al. (2020 4 )). Also see the following link . This statement needs to be corrected and to cite this relevant literature. The involvement of the company XenTech, who already have established breast cancer xenografts, needs to be clarified. - Is the company only providing a service or will maintain, use and sell those established xenografts? If commercial rights are involved in favor of XenTech, it is important to state that patients will be made aware during consent. The choice of into the inter-scapular region or into the renal capsule as the injection sites are unusual (not orthotopic) for breast cancer. - PDXs have been shown to undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution (Ben-David et al . (2017 5 )), which should be noted and cited in this manuscript. The environment where PDXs are established will also have an impact on the molecular profile of the tumor, thus the choice to avoid the mammary gland to establish PDXs in this study needs to be clearly explained and justified. Moreover, it is not clear if estrogen pellets (not in the feed) will be implanted in the mice for the establishment and maintenance of luminal B PDXs. Considering the above, why is not the design considering cryopreservation of tumor pieces to store alongside the injection of some pieces into mice? This will allow the option to implant the PDXs in the mammary glands if the investigators find that the inter-scapular region and the renal capsule sites cause genetic/molecular drift in the established PDXs compared to the original tissue and during PDX passage (F0-F3). Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Partly Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable References 1. Bruna A, Rueda O, Greenwood W, Batra A, et al.: A Biobank of Breast Cancer Explants with Preserved Intra-tumor Heterogeneity to Screen Anticancer Compounds. Cell . 2016; 167 (1): 260-274.e22 Publisher Full Text 2. DeRose YS, Wang G, Lin YC, Bernard PS, et al.: Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes. Nat Med . 2011; 17 (11): 1514-20 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 3. Sachs N, de Ligt J, Kopper O, Gogola E, et al.: A Living Biobank of Breast Cancer Organoids Captures Disease Heterogeneity. Cell . 2018; 172 (1-2): 373-386.e10 Publisher Full Text 4. Rosenbluth J, Schackmann R, Gray G, Selfors L, et al.: Organoid cultures from normal and cancer-prone human breast tissues preserve complex epithelial lineages. Nature Communications . 2020; 11 (1). Publisher Full Text 5. Ben-David U, Ha G, Tseng YY, Greenwald NF, et al.: Patient-derived xenografts undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution. Nat Genet . 2017; 49 (11): 1567-1575 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Breast cancer research and translational in vitro and in vivo models, including PDXs and PDCLs. My area of research is cancer signalling and identification of biomarkers and therapeutic targets from clinical samples to investigate their role and clinical potential in preclinical models. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 21 Jun 2021 Hugo Veyssière, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM UMR 1240 « Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques », Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France Thank you for your report and comments. The abstract and the introduction make a statement that "Most of the available PDX, derived from breast cancer, were generated from metastatic tumours." - This is not accurate. Indeed, most of the commonly breast cancer cells lines established few decades ago were from metastases (mainly pleural effusion). In contrast, PDXs and organoids, which have been xenotransplanted into mice and recapitulate the primary tumors, are more commonly derived from primary breast cancer tissue (Bruna et al. (2016), DeRose et al. (2011), Sachs et al. (2018), Rosenbluth et al. (2020)). Also see the following link. This statement needs to be corrected and to cite this relevant literature. Response: The statement has been modified and relevant literature is cited in the introduction. The involvement of the company XenTech, who already have established breast cancer xenografts, needs to be clarified. - Is the company only providing a service or will maintain, use and sell those established xenografts? If commercial rights are involved in favor of XenTech, it is important to state that patients will be made aware during consent. Response: XenTech may commercialize the product of its research (this sentence is present in the consent). And patients will be made aware during consent. We added a sentence in the “Recruitment and consent” paragraph: “ XenTech may commercialize the product of its research, and patients will be made aware during consent.” The choice of into the inter-scapular region or into the renal capsule as the injection sites are unusual (not orthotopic) for breast cancer. - PDXs have been shown to undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution (Ben-David et al. (20175)), which should be noted and cited in this manuscript. The environment where PDXs are established will also have an impact on the molecular profile of the tumor, thus the choice to avoid the mammary gland to establish PDXs in this study needs to be clearly explained and justified. Response: For breast cancer PDXs, the placement in the interscapular region is a choice made by Xentech when it began generating breast cancer PDXs. This implant site allows easy access to a well vascularized region with tissue that in female mice is in continuity with the mammary gland. We added a sentence in the “PDX generation” paragraph. Moreover, it is not clear if estrogen pellets (not in the feed) will be implanted in the mice for the establishment and maintenance of luminal B PDXs. Response: As mentioned in the manuscript, for the ER+ PDX models, mice will receive 17β-estradiol supplementation in the drinking water, useful for the establishment and the maintenance of these models Considering the above, why is not the design considering cryopreservation of tumor pieces to store alongside the injection of some pieces into mice? This will allow the option to implant the PDXs in the mammary glands if the investigators find that the inter-scapular region and the renal capsule sites cause genetic/molecular drift in the established PDXs compared to the original tissue and during PDX passage (F0-F3). Response: As we wrote in the manuscript, “a part is grafted to a new set of mice; a second part is fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin for histological studies; a third part is frozen in liquid nitrogen for molecular studies, and a last part is frozen in a 10% DMSO solution to generate a viable tissue stock.” Thus, we do want to have a viable tissue stock. However, because the surgical specimen will be limited we are not sure that we will have enough material to cryopreserve a part of the tumors. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Al-Ejeh F. Peer Review Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.54662.r84566) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v2#referee-response-84566 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2021 Finlay-Schultz J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 12 Mar 2021 | for Version 2 Jessica Finlay-Schultz , Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80309, USA 0 Views copyright © 2021 Finlay-Schultz J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions I have no further comments. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise My expertise is in the establishment and propagation of breast cancer PDX models, primarily from hormone receptor positive tumors. My area of research includes estrogen and progesterone receptor signaling, crosstalk, and transcriptional regulation in breast cancer models, including PDX and cell lines derived from primary tissue and PDX models. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Finlay-Schultz J. Peer Review Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.54662.r81197) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v2#referee-response-81197 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2021 Finlay-Schultz J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 26 Jan 2021 | for Version 1 Jessica Finlay-Schultz , Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, 80309, USA 0 Views copyright © 2021 Finlay-Schultz J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions In this manuscript, Veyssière et al. outline a study protocol for generation of PDX models from patient tumors of the triple negative or luminal B molecular subtypes. The overall study metrics and patient enrollment numbers appear sound, though the methods are light on experimental details. The writing is clear and concise, though the phrase “primitive mammary tumours” should be replaced with “primary mammary tumours” in the Abstract. While I understand that the authors will be using a private company to generate these PDX models, some details of their generation should be included, and the group would benefit from reviewing additional established PDX generation protocols. Kabos et al. (PMID 22821401) 1 have established that supplementation with 17β-estradiol is useful for the establishment of ER+ PDX models. Is there a plan for hormone supplementation for the Luminal B portion of this study? In addition, breast cancer PDX models are often placed into the #4 mammary fat pad of these animals. Is there a specific reason behind avoiding this placement in this study? Will there be the use of an extracellular matrix for implantation of the primary tumor? While ECM use tends to increase xenograft take rates, there have been historical links between some ECM producers and the propagation of LDEV (Lactate Dehydrogenase Elevating Virus) with tumor tissues. Review and citation of Dobrolecki et al (PMID 28025748) 2 will help answer some major questions in the breast tumor PDX field, and this should be referenced in your study, as it is a comprehensive review of the majority of well-established breast tumor PDX banks. Please include that the primary molecule that differs between Luminal A and Luminal B tumors is Ki67. While Luminal B tumors may often exhibit lower HR expression, it is not the main factor used to classify these tumors. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? No Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable References 1. Kabos P, Finlay-Schultz J, Li C, Kline E, et al.: Patient-derived luminal breast cancer xenografts retain hormone receptor heterogeneity and help define unique estrogen-dependent gene signatures. Breast Cancer Res Treat . 2012; 135 (2): 415-32 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 2. Dobrolecki LE, Airhart SD, Alferez DG, Aparicio S, et al.: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research. Cancer Metastasis Rev . 35 (4): 547-573 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise My expertise is in the establishment and propagation of breast cancer PDX models, primarily from hormone receptor positive tumors. My area of research includes estrogen and progesterone receptor signaling, crosstalk, and transcriptional regulation in breast cancer models, including PDX and cell lines derived from primary tissue and PDX models. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 10 Mar 2021 Hugo Veyssière, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM UMR 1240 « Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques », Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript. We appreciate your helpful comments. 1) Kabos et al. (PMID 22821401) 1 have established that supplementation with 17β-estradiol is useful for the establishment of ER+ PDX models. Is there a plan for hormone supplementation for the Luminal B portion of this study? All the ER+ PDX models are established in mice receiving 17β-estradiol supplementation in the drinking water. A sentence has been added in our manuscript. 2) In addition, breast cancer PDX models are often placed into the #4 mammary fat pad of these animals. Is there a specific reason behind avoiding this placement in this study? For breast cancer PDXs, the placement in the interscapular region is a choice made by Xentech when it began generating breast cancer PDXs. This implant site allows easy access to a well vascularized region with tissue that in female mice is in continuity with the mammary gland. 3) Will there be the use of an extracellular matrix for implantation of the primary tumor? While ECM use tends to increase xenograft take rates, there have been historical links between some ECM producers and the propagation of LDEV (Lactate Dehydrogenase Elevating Virus) with tumor tissues. We do not foresee the use of any matrix during the first implantation, only tumor fragments will be implanted. 4) Review and citation of Dobrolecki et al (PMID 28025748) 2 will help answer some major questions in the breast tumor PDX field, and this should be referenced in your study, as it is a comprehensive review of the majority of well-established breast tumor PDX banks. Dobrolecki et al. has been added to references. 5) Please include that the primary molecule that differs between Luminal A and Luminal B tumors is Ki67. While Luminal B tumors may often exhibit lower HR expression, it is not the main factor used to classify these tumors. Precisions have been added in the article. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Finlay-Schultz J. Peer Review Report For: XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment from surgical specimens of patients with triple negative or luminal b breast cancer [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2021, 9 :1219 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.29677.r76613) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v1#referee-response-76613 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v3&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Veyssière H et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v3/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219", templates : { twitter : "XENOBREAST Trial: A prospective study of xenografts establishment.... Veyssière H et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/9-1219/v3" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/26873/57809") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "57809"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "80131": 0, "83715": 0, "80130": 0, "83714": 0, "80133": 0, "83717": 0, "80132": 0, "83716": 0, "83718": 0, "73486": 0, "73489": 0, "73488": 0, "73493": 0, "73492": 0, "74657": 0, "74658": 0, "82085": 0, "87975": 8, "82087": 0, "87974": 0, "82086": 0, "82088": 0, "81323": 0, "81322": 0, "81197": 9, "89015": 0, "89014": 0, "76609": 0, "76611": 0, "76610": 0, "76613": 43, "76612": 0, "76615": 0, "76614": 0, "84565": 0, "84564": 0, "84567": 0, "84566": 19, "84569": 0, "84568": 0, "84571": 0, "84570": 0, "76637": 0, "84573": 0, "84572": 0, "76639": 0, "83039": 0, "76638": 0, "83041": 0, "76640": 0, "83040": 0, "83043": 0, "83042": 0, "82673": 0, "82674": 0, "75900": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "6dd31152-c088-4100-b3be-60f9a8a4ce98"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00