New estimates and synthesis of chromosome number, ploidy level and genome size variation in Allium sect. Codonoprasum: a step towards understanding the hitherto unresolved diversification and evolution of the section

New estimates and synthesis of chromosome number, ploidy level and genome size variation in Allium sect. Codonoprasum: a step towards understanding the hitherto unresolved diversification and evolution of the section | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article New estimates and synthesis of chromosome number, ploidy level and genome size variation in Allium sect. Codonoprasum : a step towards understanding the hitherto unresolved diversification and evolution of the section Lucie Kobrlová, Michaela Jandová, Kateřina Vojtěchová, Lenka Šafářová, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4972960/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 24 Dec, 2024 Read the published version in Botanical Studies → Version 1 posted 5 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background The genus Allium is known for its high chromosomal variability, but most chromosome counts are based on a few individuals and genome size (GS) reports are limited in certain taxonomic groups. This is evident in the Allium sect. Codonoprasum , a species-rich (> 150 species) and taxonomically complex section with weak morphological differences between taxa, the presence of polyploidy and frequent misidentification of taxa. Consequently, a significant proportion of older karyological reports may be unreliable and GS data are lacking for the majority of species within the section. This study, using chromosome counting and flow cytometry (FCM), provides the first complex and detailed insight into variation in chromosome number, polyploid frequency and distribution, and GS in section members, a step towards understanding the section's unresolved diversification and evolution. Results We analysed 1,582 individuals from 311 populations of 25 taxa and reported DNA ploidy levels and their GS, with calibration from chromosome counts in 21 taxa. Five taxa had multiple ploidy levels. GS estimates for 16 taxa are primary estimates. A comprehensive review of chromosome number and DNA-ploidy levels in 128 taxa of the section revealed that all taxa had x = 8, except A. rupestre with two polyploid series (x = 8, descending dysploidy x = 7), unique for this section. Diploid taxa dominated (71.1%), while di-/polyploid (12.5%) and pure polyploid (16.4%) taxa were less common. Ploidy diversity showed that diploid taxa were dominant in the eastern Mediterranean (> 85%), decreasing towards the west and north, with only polyploid taxa present in northern and northwestern Europe. A 4.1-fold variation in GS was observed across 33 taxa (2C = 22.3–92.1 pg), mainly due to polyploidy, with GS downsizing observed in taxa with multiple ploidy levels. Intra-sectional GS variation suggests evolutionary relationships, and intraspecific GS variation within some taxa may indicate taxonomic heterogeneity and/or historical migration patterns. Conclusions Our study showed advantages of FCM as an effective tool for detecting ploidy levels and determining GS within the section. GS could be an additional character in understanding evolution and phylogenetic relationships within the section. cytogeography DNA ploidy level chromosome number flow cytometry genome size polyploidy Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Background As the evolutionary history of organisms is inscribed in their chromosomes, chromosome number is a fundamental genomic attribute of an organism (Mayrose and Lysák 2020 ). Information on chromosome number (Rice et al., 2015 ) and nuclear DNA content (Greilhuber et al. 2005 ; Pellicer and Leitch 2020 ; Siljak-Yakovlev et al. 2020 ) highlights the role of numerical variation (Van de Peer et al., 2017 ) and, together with the study of karyotypic differentiation, helps to understand the role of structural changes in evolutionary processes (e.g. Schubert and Lysák 2011 ; Mandáková and Lysák 2018 ). Chromosome number and genome size (hereafter GS) are important species-specific traits (Stebbins 1971 ; Guerra 2008 , 2012 ; Goldblatt and Lowry 2011 ; Carta et al. 2020 ; Pellicer and Leitch 2020 ), which are useful tools for discriminating between taxa and resolving taxonomy within groups that are critical, for example, due to morphological reduction, phenotypic plasticity, mating systems and reticulate evolution (e.g. Castro et al. 2012 ; Hajrudinović et al. 2015 ; Prančl et al. 2018 ; Popelka et al. 2019 ; Afonso et al. 2021 ). GS and its intraspecific variation may also help to understand the evolutionary forces shaping genomic features (Šmarda and Bureš 2010 ; Prančl et al. 2014 , 2018 ; Becher et al. 2021 ) and functional diversity of plants (e.g. Šímová and Herben 2012 ; Roddy et al. 2020 ; Bitomský et al. 2022 , 2023 ). Reports on the chromosomes of species are usually based on small numbers of individuals. Such an approach may underestimate the variability in cytotype composition within and between populations, which is usually the result of genome duplication (Stuessy 2009 ). From a practical perspective, flow cytometry has proven valuable in plant biosystematics over the last two decades (Bourge et al. 2018 ; Sliwinska et al. 2022 ; Loureiro et al., 2023 ). This technique allows rapid and non-destructive estimation of DNA-ploidy levels and nuclear DNA content in a large number of samples (e.g. Trávníček et al. 2012 ; Čertner et al. 2017 , 2022 ; Rejlová et al. 2019 ). Its application has led to the discovery of diverse cytotypes in various plant taxa, providing a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying cytotype origin and coexistence (reviewed in Kolář et al. 2017 ), cytogeographic diversity across species ranges (e.g. Mráz et al. 2008 ; Duchoslav et al. 2010 , 2020 ; Šafářová and Duchoslav 2010 ; Šafářová et al. 2011 ; Kobrlová et al. 2016 , 2022 ; Taraška et al. 2021 , 2024 ; Horák et al. 2023 ; Vejvodová et al. 2024 ) or the identification of patterns of ecological diversification or habitat shifts (e.g. Duchoslav et al. 2020 ; Kobrlová et al. 2022 r et al. 2023), which can provide insight into the evolutionary history of species (Blommaert 2020 ; Cang et al. 2024 ). The genus Allium L. (Amaryllidaceae, Allieae) is one of the largest monocotyledonous genera (Chase et al. 2009 ; Costa et al. 2020 ), with over a thousand accepted species (POWO 2024 ), represented by perennial rhizomatous or bulbiferous herbs that combine sexual and asexual reproduction (Rabinowitch and Currah 2002 ), and is widely distributed throughout the Northern Hemisphere (Fritsch and Friesen 2002 ; Friesen et al. 2006 ; Li et al. 2010 ; Hauenschild et al. 2017 ). The genus exhibits multiple basic chromosome numbers, including x = 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 (Hanelt et al. 1992 ; Friesen et al. 2006 ; Li et al. 2016 ; Peruzzi et al. 2017 ; Han et al. 2020 ). The genus also displays high levels of polyploidy (Friesen 1992 ; Hanelt et al. 1992 ; Han et al. 2020 ) and occasional B chromosome appearance (Speta 1984 ; Holmes and Bougourd 1989 ; Vujošević et al. 2013 ). Polyploidisation is considered the main driver of adaptations and speciation across diverse environments within the genus (Han et al. 2020 ). A number of studies have been conducted on the diversity of chromosome number (for a comprehensive survey see Peruzzi et al. 2017 ; Han et al. 2020 ) and GS (Leitch et al. 2019 ) in the genus Allium . However, despite the genus's taxonomic richness, certain groups within the genus are underrepresented in databases of chromosome count and GS. This is particularly evident in the Allium sect. Codonoprasum Rchnb. This section is one of the largest and taxonomically most complicated within the genus (Hanelt 1996 ; Salmeri et al. 2014 , 2016 ; Özhatay and Koçyiğit 2019 ), exhibiting minor morphological differences between taxa and presence of polyploid species/species groups (Tzanoudakis and Vosa 1988 ; Peruzzi et al. 2017 ; Duchoslav et al. 2020 ; Han et al. 2020 ). This often leads to misidentification of taxa (Salmeri et al. 2016 ; Vojtěchová et al. 2023 ), and thus a significant proportion of older karyological reports for certain species may not be reliable due to uncertain identification of the studied individuals. In addition, GS data are lacking for the majority of species within the section, with only a small subset of taxa having been studied (Ohri et al. 1998 ; Baranyi and Greilhuber 1999 ; Duchoslav et al. 2013 ; Šmarda et al. 2019 ; Vojtěchová et al. 2023 , 2024 ). Furthermore, more detailed analyses focusing on population-level differences in GS (i.e. global and local distribution patterns of cytotypes) are almost absent for section members (Duchoslav et al. 2010 , 2013 ; 2020 ; Šafářová and Duchoslav 2010 ; Šafářová et al. 2011 ). To address these issues in a broader context, we collected population samples of 25 taxa (species, subspecies) of A . sect. Codonoprasum across Europe and neighbouring regions. Using classical karyology, flow cytometry and a comprehensive review of the available literature, our aims were to (i) determine the diversity of DNA ploidy levels ( sensu Suda et al. 2006 ) within and between populations for each taxon studied, (ii) validate the detected DNA ploidy levels by chromosome counting, (iii) estimate the GS of the detected ploidy levels and evaluate its variation and spatial pattern, and (iv) critically compare the new data with those from the literature. Finally, we aimed to discuss the patterns obtained in more general content. Therefore, we extracted all available data on chromosome number and GS for the remaining section members not covered by our present research and synthesised the current knowledge on cytogenetic diversity within the section. Our goal is to highlight problematic groups and to stimulate further studies aimed primarily at understanding the taxonomic relationships and phylogeny of this evolutionarily young group. Material and methods Plant material and species identification Determination of the studied taxa was based on the descriptions in the original species/subspecies descriptions, regional floras or studies dealing with their taxonomy. Specifically, we mostly accepted the recent treatments dealing with the respective species. Plant individuals were collected between 2004 and 2023 from natural populations across Europe, Caucasus and Israel, with emphasis to cover as much of the range of the taxa studied as possible (Table S1 ). Plants were transported and cultivated in the experimental garden of Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech Republic. All analyses were done with the cultivated plants. The voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of Palacký University in Olomouc (OL). Chromosome counts Actively growing, young roots were harvested from the pot-cultivated plants, pre-treated with 8-hydroxyquinoline (0.002 M) in darkness at room temperature for 4 h, fixed in a cold mixture of ethanol and acetic acid (3:1) overnight and then stored at 4°C until use. Selected root tips were hydrolysed in 5 N HCl for 25 minutes, stained with Schiff reagent for 40 minutes and squashed in 45% acetic acid (Lillie 1951 ). Preparations were photographed and counted using an Olympus CX-31 light microscope. Usually, at least five metaphases were counted for each individual studied. Flow cytometry Flow cytometry (FCM) was used to estimate the DNA ploidy level (relative genome size, RGS, i.e. ratio of the 2C-peak of the sample to the 2C-peak of the internal standard; Suda et al. 2006 ) and to determine nuclear DNA content, i.e. the holoploid genome size (absolute genome size, AGS; 2C value sensu Greilhuber et al. 2005 ) of samples. The methodical recommendations of Sliwinska et al. ( 2022 ) were followed. Chromosome counts for selected individuals analysed by FCM served as reference material for the estimates obtained using FCM. The monoploid genome size (1Cx value sensu Greilhuber et al. 2005 ) was calculated as the 2C value of the sample divided by its ploidy level. Samples were prepared according to the protocol described by Duchoslav et al. ( 2010 ) and stained with propidium iodide (PI) with addition of RNAse (both 50 µg·ml– 1 ). The analyses were performed on a Partec PAS (Partec GmbH, Münster, Germany) or BD Accuri C6 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA) cytometer. Secale cereale L. ‘Daňkovské’ (2C = 16.19 pg; Doležel et al. 1998 ); Triticum aestivum ‘Saxana’ (2C = 34.24 pg; Šafářová and Duchoslav 2010 ); Pisum sativum ‘Ctirad’ (2C = 8.75 pg; Vojtěchová et al. 2023 ); Vicia faba 'Inovec' (2C = 26.81 pg, the value recalculated to the primary standard S. cereale ) served as internal standards. Where multiple internal standards were used for FCM within a given taxon, the observed values based on the less frequently used standards were recalculated to the dominant standard and these values are presented. Separate plants or mixed samples of up to four plants per population were measured for the RGS estimation. For each (mixed) sample, fluorescence intensity of usually 3,000 particles were recorded for the RGS estimations. If more peaks were identified in the mixed sample, measurements were repeated with each individual measured separately. The following measurement strategy was chosen to ensure validity of the AGS estimation: (i) all measurements were made over period when the plants were in an identical phenological phase of development, with young fresh leaves without any symptoms of senescence or pathogen attack (March to May), (ii) at least 5000 nuclei per sample were recorded, (iii) only CV for the G 0 /G 1 peaks of the standard and Allium samples below 5% were accepted, (iv) each sample was measured by the same operator at least three different times on different days and mean AGS value was calculated from these three measurements (Doležel et al. 2007 ). Bibliographic review on chromosome counts and GS An extensive bibliographic review was performed using the metadatabase CCDB (Rice et al. 2015 ), the plant C-value database (Leitch et al. 2019 ) and additional own searches, providing a detailed list of chromosome numbers and nuclear DNA contents (2C values) estimated by different methods (FCM, Feulgen microdensitometry (FEM), Vickers M86 scanning microdensitometry (VIM), Hardie et al. 2002 ; Doležel et al. 2007 ) of the taxa of A. sect. Codonoprasum published to date. All records were critically reviewed from a taxonomic point of view to ensure correct determination and nomenclature, according to the original publications and recent taxonomic concepts, as well as by direct contact with the authors of the original descriptions, if possible. The assignment of the studied taxa to A . sect. Codonoprasum usually followed the original description or later taxonomic revisions. Recently, Özhatay and Koçyiğit ( 2019 ) transferred 23 species, mostly described from Turkey and originally assigned to A . sect. Codonoprasum , to A . sect. Scorodon K. Koch. We present both taxonomic treatments in the review, i.e. with and without acceptance of the above-mentioned section change. The majority of extracted chromosome data sets of the studied taxa (those with a given locality) were georeferenced. Distribution maps of the different ploidy levels were constructed for selected di-&polyploid and polyploid taxa with a large number of records. Additionally, all available GS estimates for Allium (Leitch et al. 2019 ) were extracted and used as a background GS data to describe the known variation in GS of the genus. Data analyses Frequency of different cytotype compositions of populations was estimated for each studied taxon based on the presence of cytotypes within populations. Frequency of each cytotype within each taxon was based on the total number of FCM-analysed individuals, ignoring their population assignment. Summary statistics of GS parameters were calculated for each studied taxon, based on population-level data. Relationship between genome size (AGS, RGS) and geographic coordinates (latitude, longitude) for selected ploidy levels of the taxa studied was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. Data were analysed in NCSS 9 ( www.ncss.com ). The maps were created in QGIS 3.28 ( www.qgis.org ) , using the Terrain Elevation Above Sea Level map provided by the Global Solar Atlas 2.0 ( https://globalsolaratlas.info ) as a background. Results and discussion Chromosome number, DNA-ploidy level and GS assessment for 25 studied taxa The new data on the diversity and frequency of cytotypes in their populations and the RGS and AGS for each ploidy level in each taxon are summarised in Table 1, while Table S1 gives these data for the individual populations studied. Detailed bibliographic reviews of published karyological and GS data for the taxa studied are given in Tables S2 and S3, respectively. A total of 25 taxa were analysed by FCM (311 populations/1 582 individuals), with first AGS estimates provided for 16 taxa (Table 1). For nine taxa, several reports on nuclear DNA content have been published previously (Tables S3), whereas for two of them we detected the occurrence of new cytotypes. In five taxa more than one ploidy level was found. Chromosome numbers were counted for 21 taxa, with a new report for A. rupestre Steven. Multiple ploidy levels were confirmed in four taxa. A commentary on the data obtained for each taxon studied is given below, together with critical assessment of the available literature. Allium aetnense Brullo, Pavone & Salmeri . – The species is a regional endemic of Mt. Etna in Sicily (Brullo et al. 2013 ). The FCM of six plants from a population on the northern slopes of Mt. Etna revealed a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n = 16, Fig. S1 A), consistent with the only previous report (Brullo et al. 2013 ). Our AGS estimate is the first for the species (Table 1). Allium carinatum subsp. carinatum . – The subspecies is the most common member of an informal A. carinatum complex ( sensu Levan 1933 ; Stearn 1980), although in some taxonomic treatments (e.g. Jauzein and Tison 2001 ) more complex treatment is applied, where A. flexum Waldst. & Kit. and A. consimile Jordan ex Gren. are separated from it as independent species. It is native to northern Turkey and most parts of Europe except southwestern and northwestern Europe, Finland, Belarus and Russia (POWO 2024 ). The FCM of 464 plants from 77 populations revealed the presence of three cytotypes (Table 1): dominant triploids (2n = 3 x = 24), less frequent diploids (2n = 2 x = 16) and a very rare cytotype with the RGS corresponding to DNA-tetraploids, detected for the first time in this subspecies. The RGS data in di- and triploids were confirmed by chromosome counts (Fig. S1 B,C), whereas this was not possible in the inferred DNA-tetraploids due to poor growth of the plants. Previously, two ploidy levels (i.e. 2 x , 3 x ) have been reported for this taxon in numerous studies (e.g. Levan 1933 ; Geitler and Tschermak-Woess 1962 ; Table S2 ). Jauzein and Tison ( 2001 ) report tetraploid count for related A. consimile from France. Since some authorities (POWO 2024 ) consider this species to be a synonym of A. carinatum (= A. carinatum subsp. carinatum ), this count might be confirmation of supposed DNA-4 x we measured by FCM. However, we agree with Jauzein and Tison ( 2001 ) that its taxonomic status requires further study. In addition, aneuploids (2n = 25, 26) have rarely been documented in several Austrian populations (Tschermak-Woess 1947 ; Geitler and Tschermak-Woess 1962 ). However, later authors (e.g. Speta 1984 ; Wetschnig 1992), who have also detected supernumerary chromosomes in triploid Austrian populations, have presented them as B chromosomes. Similarly, Cheshmedzhiev ( 1973 ) has reported the presence of a B chromosome in one triploid Bulgarian population (Table S2 ). Pure triploid populations (79.2%) followed by pure diploid populations (14.3%) were the most frequent in our data set. Pure DNA-4 x and mixed 2 x + 3 x and 2 x + DNA-4 x populations were rare, accounting for a total of five populations (Table 1). Previously, only pure cytotype populations had been reported, with triploids being more common than diploids (Table S2 ). In agreement with published data, diploids and triploids had a similar geographical distribution and occurred throughout the range of the subspecies (Fig. 1 A). Several new national records were found for both di- and triploids (Table S1 ). Putative DNA-4 x were found in three countries (Bulgaria, Italy, Slovakia). The RGS of diploids showed a tendency for bimodal distribution and a significant geographical pattern of increasing RGS westwards (latitude: r s = 0.341, P = 0.195; longitude: r s = -0.785, P < 0.001, Fig. 2 A, Fig. S2 A). In triploids, RGS also increased westwards (latitude: r s = 0.305, P = 0.019; longitude: r s = -0.485, P < 0.001; Fig. 2 A), but the pattern was more complex, with occurrences of mosaic parapatry or mosaic sympatry of populations with high and low RGS (Fig. S2 B). The AGS of diploids and triploids were variable, i.e. 31.2–36.9 pg (mean 32.9 ± 1.8 pg) and 45.0–51.7 pg (mean 47.9 ± 1.5 pg), respectively. The AGS of likely DNA-tetraploids was 56.7 pg (Fig. S2 C). The 1Cx values decreased with increasing ploidy level (Table 1). Previous estimates of nuclear DNA content based on various techniques for both di- and triploids (Nagl and Fusenig 1979 ; Labani and Elkington 1987 ; Ohri et al. 1998 ; Baranyi and Greilhuber 1999 ; Šmarda et al. 2019 ) were within the range of the AGS we measured and followed the spatial patterns we observed (although sometimes reported with incorrect ploidy, as the authors did not count chromosomes), considering the geographical origin of the measured plants (Table S3 ). Only one of the previously published DNA amounts (2C = 22.4 pg, Bösen and Nagl 1978 ) was completely different, most probably belonging to another species. Divergent AGS values we measured might suggest the existence of several lineages within the taxon and require additional study employing molecular markers. Allium carinatum subsp. pulchellum (Regel) Bonnier & Layens . – The subspecies is distributed as native in southeastern France, southern parts of Central Europe, Italy, and southeastern Europe to western Romania (POWO 2024 ) and northeastern Turkey (Marmara region, Kollmann 1984 ). The FCM of 120 plants from 21 populations (Table 1, Table S1 ) revealed a single cytotype, identified as diploid by multiple chromosome counts (2n = 16; Fig. S1 D). This agrees with numerous previous records of diploids from several European countries, the only exceptions being a triploid count (2n = 24 + 1B; Cheshmedzhiev 1973 ) and several diploid counts with the presence of a B chromosome (2n = 16 + 1B; Cheshmedzhiev 1973 , 1975a ) from Bulgaria (Fig. 1 B, Table S2 ). The RGS showed substantial variation (Table 1), with a significant increase towards the northwest (latitude: r s = 0.620, P = 0.003; longitude: r s = -0.788, P < 0.001; Fig. 2 B). The AGS followed the spatial pattern observed in the RGS, ranging from 28.1 to 38.8 pg with a mean of 33.6 ± 3.60 pg (Table 1). The Bulgarian and Serbian populations had considerably lower RGS and AGS (-38%) than the other populations (Fig. S2 D). So far, measurements of the nuclear DNA amount using FEM and FCM have been provided by Labani and Elkington ( 1987 ) and Veselý et al. ( 2012 ) for samples of unknown origin and SE France, respectively (Table S3 ). Both agree well with the majority of our estimates. As the rather divergent AGS values were confirmed by chromosome counting, there are at least two diploid lineages within the taxon: one with lower AGS typical of the eastern localities and the other with higher AGS common to the more western localities. Allium daninianum Brullo, Pavone & Salmeri . – Widespread representative of the A. stamineum species group in the Middle East (Brullo et al. 1996a , 2007 ). FCM of 10 plants from three Israeli populations (Table S1 ) revealed a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n = 16, Fig. S1 G). This is consistent with previous records of diploids from Israel and Lebanon (Table S2 ), with the occurrence of 1–2 B chromosomes reported by Brullo et al. ( 1996a ) from the Coastal Galilee. Our AGS estimate is the first for the species (Table 1). Allium dentiferum Webb and Berthel . – The species is considered taxonomically critical due to confusion with A. longispathum Redouté. Some authorities (Bartolucci et al. 2024 ; POWO 2024 ) and French authors (Jauzein and Tison 2001 ; Dobignard and Chatelain 2010 ; Tison and de Foucault 2014 ) treat A. dentiferum as a synonym of A. longispathum , considering some diagnostic characters of the former species (especially the presence of interstaminal teeth) to be variable and not distinctive, whereas Brullo (Brullo et al. 1991 , 2008 ; Brullo and Guarino 2017 ) considers A. dentiferum to be distinct from A. longispathum . The taxonomic confusion is related to the fact that both the protologue and the original illustration of A. longispathum (Redoute 1811) and the lectotype designated by Wilde-Duyfjes (1976) do not allow an unequivocal morphological differentiation from some related species. The treatment on the origin and morphological variation and habitat of the type material of A. longispathum by Jauzein and Tison ( 2001 ) and the recent photographs of plants of the species from the vicinity of the type locality (Bordeaux, France) on iNaturalist ( https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/14161096 ) suggest that both taxa might be closely related, if not identical. If identical, the name A. longispathum has priority over A. dentiferum (Jauzein and Tison 2001 ). During our research (Vojtěchová et al., unpubl. results) we observed two groups of plants: (i) plants that closely resembled the description of A. dentiferum ( sensu Brullo et al. 2008 ), (ii) plants that differed from “typical” A. dentiferum by shorter (4–5.5 mm), apiculate, truncate or subobtuse petals with a slightly different colour (dirty white with pinkish to purplish strips or strikes), ovary cylindrical-elliptical, smooth or slightly papillose in the upper part, stamens exerted from the perigon and often inconspicuous or absent interstaminal teeths (provisionally labelled as “ A. dentiferum-pallens ”). The second group of plants mix characters of several species, i.e. they partly resemble the description of A. longispathum ( sensu Jauzein and Tison 2001 ), but also A. pallens L. p. p. ( sensu Brullo et al. 2003 ). Genetic analysis is urgently needed to clarify the relationships within this complex, as the morphological variation observed could be partly due to hybridisation between A. dentiferum and A. pallens , or introgression of A. pallens into A. dentiferum , as speculated by Jauzein and Tison ( 2001 ). The FCM of 199 plants from 39 populations of “typical” A. dentiferum (Table S1 ) revealed two cytotypes, confirmed by several chromosome counts (Table 1, Fig. S1 E,F): tetraploid (2n = 32) and pentaploid (2n = 40), both also reported in previous reports, which were directly referred to as A. dentiferum (Brullo et al. 1991 , 2008 ). However, in contrast to previous reports (Table S2 ) where tetraploids dominated (69%) over pentaploids (41%), our data suggest the opposite (4 x : 12.8%, 5 x : 87.2%, Table 1). We confirmed previous records of tetraploids from Spain, Italy and Greece (Crete). Brullo et al. ( 1991 , 2008 ) also recorded tetraploids in Malta, Cyprus and Turkey (Table S2 ). Pentaploids were documented from Italy and France (Table S2 ), and we recorded them as new records for Croatia, Slovenia, Greece and Spain (Fig. 1 C, Table S1 ). Only pure-cytotype populations were found (Table 1). Several chromosome records attributed to the Bulgarian A. pallens var. pallens by Cheshmedziev (1970, 1975b) may actually belong to A. dentiferum , considering the photographs of the analysed plants and the notes on their morphology made by the author in his later paper (Cheshmedziev 1975b). On the other hand, some chromosome reports (Cheshmedziev 1975c, 1977) of Bulgarian plants considered as A. longispathum probably represent other, presently unidentified, species (Table S2 ). Koçyiğit and Özhatay ( 2011 ) reported diploids of A. dentiferum for plants sampled in Turkey, but we consider this number to belong to other species. The RGS in tetraploids were almost constant (latitude: r s = 0.500, P = 0.667; longitude: r s = 0.500, P = 0.667; Fig. 2 C, Fig. S2 E) while it showed intermediate variation in pentaploids, with nearly significant increase towards the east (latitude: r s = -0.062, P = 0.728; longitude: r s = 0.340, P = 0.053; Fig. 2 C, Fig. S2 F). The AGS of pentaploids followed the spatial pattern observed in the RGS, with the easternmost populations having about 5 pg (7%) higher AGS than the westermost populations (Table S1 ). Our AGS estimates are the first for the both ploidies, with the 1Cx values decreasing with increasing ploidy level (Table 1). Twenty-six plants of the nine populations assigned to the second group (“ A. dentiferum-pallens ”) were all found to be tetraploid (Table 1, Fig. S1 H), which agrees with data from France for A. longispathum (Jauzein and Tison 2001 ). In contrast to tetraploid A. dentiferum , however, their RGS were more variable (Fig. S2 G) and mean AGS was slightly shifted to lower values (Table 1, Table S1 ). These populations were found in Spain, Italy, Croatia, Bulgaria and Greece (Fig. 1 D, Table S1 ) and require additional taxonomic study. Allium flavum L . – The taxonomy and cytogenetics of this species complex are still poorly understood. The most recent taxonomic treatment (POWO 2024 ) recognizes four infraspecific taxa: subsp. flavum , subsp. ionochlorum Maire, subsp. tauricum (Besser ex Rchb.) K. Richt., and var. pilosum (Kollmann & Koyuncu) Koçyiğit & Özhatay. In addition, several other taxa very similar in morphology to members of the A. flavum complex have been described from the Eastern Mediterranean and neighbouring regions, most of them being assigned into the informal A. stamineum species group (see Brullo et al. 2007 ). In the Balkan Peninsula this is the case for A. guicciardii Heldr. (see below) or A. croaticum Bogdanović, Brullo, Mitić and Salmeri (Brullo et al. 2007 ; Bogdanović et al. 2008 ). Many karyological reports of A. flavum remain unclear, as they refer to A. flavum s.l., without further differentiation at the intraspecific level (Liveri et al. 2019 ). However, in some cases, knowing the sampling location and the range of the taxon or taxonomic concept used in the respective study, it is possible to infer the infraspecific taxon for which the corresponding chromosome number was published (Table S2 ). The nominate subspecies ( A. flavum subsp . flavum , including var. minus Boiss.) is distributed as native to southwestern and southern Europe, the southern part of Central Europe and southeastern Europe from southern France to Romania, and Turkey (POWO 2024 ). The FCM of 337 plants from 76 populations revealed two cytotypes, confirmed by several chromosome counts (Table 1, Fig. S1 I,J): diploid (2n = 16, 89.9%) and tetraploid (2n = 32, 10.1%), both also reported in previous reports (Table S2 ), rarely with the presence of additional 1–3 B chromosomes (see Vujošević et al. 2013 for survey). Cheshmedzhiev ( 1970 ) also reported an aneuploid plant (2n = 33) from Bulgaria. In addition, triploids (2n = 24) have rarely been reported from Bulgaria and Greece (Ved Brat 1965 ; Cheshmedzhiev 1994 ), but solely for var. minus (= A. webbii G. C. Clementi). Consistent with previous reports (Table S2 ), pure diploid populations were the most common (89.5%), followed by pure tetraploid populations (9.2%). Diploids were found throughout the range of the species, as previously reported (Fig. 1 E). The occurrence of tetraploids has been reported from the Balkan Peninsula (Table S2 ) and from Granada, Spain (Ruiz Rejón and Sañudo 1976). However, A. flavum is not considered to be present in Spain (Aedo 2013 ) and the count mentioned therefore belongs to a different species. The range of tetraploids increased towards the north (Fig. 1 E), with new records for Romania, Hungary and Slovakia. We also found a 2 x + 4 x mixed population in Slovakia, which is the first report of a mixed-ploidy population for the species (Table 1). The RGS of diploids showed considerable variation (Table 1), with a significant increase towards the south-east (latitude: r s = -0.285, P = 0.020; longitude: r s = 0.380, P = 0.002; Fig. 2 E, Fig. S2 I). In tetraploids, the RGS showed much less variation (Table 1), but the RGS showed the opposite spatial pattern to the diploids, increasing towards the northwest (latitude: r s = 0.714, P = 0.047; longitude: r s = -0.690, P = 0.058; Fig. 2 F, Fig. S2 J). Except for one measurement, the AGS of diploids had a unimodal pattern with a mean of 2C = 27.9 pg (Table 1), which is in good agreement with previous reports based on both FEM and FCM (Table S3 ; Baranyi and Greilhuber 1999 ; Veselý et al. 2012 ). An extremely low AGS (i.e. 2C = 21.4 pg) was detected for the population sampled near Minerve in southern France, far from the rest of the analysed populations (Table S1 ). We interpret this value as a result of processes acting on isolated and/or marginal populations at the edge of the species' range (Šmarda and Bureš 2010 ). However, more samples from southwestern Europe are needed to draw a firm conclusion on the observed pattern. The AGS of the tetraploids showed a bimodal pattern, with one population group originating from Bulgaria having AGS values between 2C = 38 and 41 pg and the second group (Eastern Central Europe, Serbia) having AGS values between 2C = 42 and 46 pg (Fig. S2 J). These divergent AGS values were confirmed by chromosome counting (Table S1 ) and fit well with previous estimates of DNA content using various methods (Labani and Elkington 1987 ; Ohri et al. 1998 ; Baranyi and Greilhuber 1999 ; Ohri and Pistrick 2001 ), although some of them (Labani and Elkington 1987 ; Ohri et al. 1998 ; Ohri and Pistrick 2001 ) erroneously present them as diploid (Table S3 ). The 1Cx values decreased with increasing ploidy level (Table 1). The subspecies Allium flavum subsp . tauricum (Besser ex Rchb.) K. Richt . is native to southeastern Europe, Ukraine, European Russia, Kazakhstan, Caucasian countries, Turkey and Iran (POWO 2024 ). Plants show rather variable size, shape and colouring of perigon, filaments and anthers (e.g. Vvedensky 1935 ; Stearn 1980; Ciocârlan 2000 ; Cheshmedzhiev 2011 ), which has probably led to the description of several taxa of low taxonomic rank (e.g. Zahariadi 1966 ; Özhatay and Koçyiğit 2019 ), but also to species misidentifications (Bogdanović et al. 2011 ; Tzanoudakis et al. 2019 ). Recently, Özhatay and Koçyiğit ( 2019 ) questioned A. paczoskianum as a synonym of A. flavum subsp. tauricum and consider both taxa as separate, different species. Furthermore, the possibility of confusion with morphologically very similar and rarely reported species of the A. stamineum group, e.g. A. guicciardii (Brullo et al. 2007 )d croaticum (Bogdanović et al. 2008 ), cannot be excluded in published records. The FCM of 62 plants from 19 populations revealed two cytotypes: karyologically confirmed tetraploids (2n = 32, Fig. S1 K) and a cytotype with the RGS approximately 75% of that measured in tetraploids (Table 1). Despite the lack of chromosome counts for these lower RGS plants, we classify them as DNA-diploids, based on a similar pattern of RGS differences between diploids and tetraploids in the closely related A. flavum subsp. flavum . However, to be sure, additional chromosome counts are desirable. Four ploidy levels and two aneuploid counts were previously reported for this taxon (Table S2 ). Tetraploids were the most frequently reported ploidy, followed by diploids. This is consistent with our data, with pure tetraploid populations being the most common (73.7%), followed by pure DNA-diploid populations (26.3%), and no records of cytotype-mixed populations (Table 1). Cheshmedzhiev ( 1975a , 1982 ) reported several additional cytotypes, mostly as single records from the Rhodopi Mts and the Thracian Lowlands in Bulgaria, i.e. penta- (2n = 40) and hexaploid (2n = 48) as well as tetraploid with 0–3 B chromosomes and aneuploids with 2n = 33 and 34. Previous records suggested partially different distribution patterns of diploids and tetraploids, with diploids reported from the Caucasus (Pogosian 1983 ; Magulaev 1992 ), Turkey (Tanker and Kurucu 1979 sub A. amphipulchellum Zahar.; Johnson and Brandham 1997 ), Northern and Southern Greece (Strid and Franzén 1981 ; Tzanoudakis and Vosa 1988 sub A. flavum ) and the island of Lesvos (Karavokyrou and Tzanoudakis 1991 sub A. flavum ), and tetraploids from Bulgaria (Cheshmedzhiev 1970 , 1975a , 1982 ) and Turkey (Özhatay 1990 , 1993 ). We recorded diploids as a new cytotype for Bulgaria and North Macedonia, and tetraploids as a new cytotype for Ukraine and North Macedonia (Table S1 ). Bulgaria represents the most cytotype-diverse region (Fig. 1 F, Table S2 ). The range of RGS in DNA-diploids was relatively narrow (Table 1), with an almost significant increase towards the east (latitude: r s = -0.154, P = 0.804; longitude: r s = 0.872, P = 0.054; Fig. 2 F, Fig. S2 K). In tetraploids, RGS was variable with a significant increase towards the southwest (latitude: r s = -0.688, P = 0.007; longitude: r s = -0.842, P < 0.001; Fig. 2 F, Fig. S2 L), i.e. opposite to that found in DNA-diploids. The pattern of AGS followed that of RGS. Outlier RGS/AGS values were recorded from two Bulgarian populations, which were approximately 2–4 pg higher than those of the remaining tetraploid populations (Table S1 ). Whether this could be an indication of taxonomic heterogeneity should be the subject of future investigation. There is only one nuclear DNA estimate using FEM, which was erroneously reported as diploid (2C = 39.6 pg, Vakhtina et al. 1977 ), although according to our measurements it is more likely to be tetraploid. The mean 1Cx of the tetraploids was lower than that of the diploids (Table 1). Allium garbarii Peruzzi . – The species is endemic to the Calabrian coast in Italy (Peruzzi 2007 ). The FCM of four plants from the locus classicus revealed a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n = 16, Fig. S1 L), confirming previous results (Peruzzi 2007 ). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table 1). Allium guicciardii Heldr . – The species of the A. stamineum group is only very rarely reported in the literature, although it is reported to occur in Central and Northern Greece and Romania (Brullo et al. 2007 ) and is considered to be a Greek endemic with a limited range (Dimopoulos et al. 2023 ). We observed a northern Greek population that clearly belonged to the A. flavum/A. stamineum groups, but differed from typical nominate A. flavum by yellow-greenish perigon and stamens white below and violet above. Though literature is not consistent in diagnostic characters to unequivocally distinguish this species from closely related taxa (Brullo et al. 2007 ; Bogdanović et al. 2008 ), we provisionally assign this population to A. guicciardii . The FCM of eight plants revealed a single cytotype (Table 1), which was not confirmed by chromosome counting (material not available). However, considering the RGS/AGS of plants analysed and those of closely related A. flavum s. str., a diploid ploidy level is suggested for these plants. Previously, diploids (2n = 16; Alden 1976 ) and tetraploids (2n = 32; Brullo et al. 2007 ) have been reported for A. guicciardii , with both ploidy levels occurring in Greece and tetraploids occurring also in Romania (Brullo et al. 2007 ). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table 1). Allium hermoneum (Kollmann & Shmida) Brullo, Guglielmo, Pavone & Salmeri . – The species is reported to occur in the alpine belt of the Anti-Lebanon Mts in Syria, Israel and Lebanon (Kollmann and Shmida 1977 ; Brullo et al. 2007 ; Danin and Fragman-Sapir 2016+). FCM analysis and chromosome counting of two plants from two micropopulations between the peaks of Mt. Habushic and Mt. Hermon (Israel) revealed a single cytotype, identified as tetraploid (2n = 32, Fig. S1 M). Previously, Shmida and Kollmann ( 1977 ) and Kollmann ( 1985 ) reported both diploid and tetraploid chromosome numbers for samples collected at the type locality (Mt. Hermon). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table 1). Allium karsianum Fomin . – The range of this species is restricted to NE Turkey and the Transcaucasus (POWO 2024 ). It is closely related to A. kunthianum Vved. from which it is problematic to distinguish due to contradictions in diagnostic characters in regional floras and frequently reported intermediates (e.g. Vvedensky 1935 ; Oganesian and Agababian 2001 ). The FCM of five plants from three populations from Georgia and Armenia revealed a single cytotype (Table 1), identified as diploid (2n = 16, Fig. S1 N), confirming previous diploid records from Armenia (Pogosian 1983 ) and Turkey (Özhatay 1993 ). Our AGS estimate for three populations of diploids was very narrow, around 2C = 35.4 pg (Table 1). There is only one previous AGS report by FEM (2C = 28.5 pg) for diploids of unknown origin by Vakhtina et al. ( 1977 ), which is, however, quite distant from our data. Allium kunthianum Vved . – This species, which is closely related to A. karsianum (see above), is reported to occur in Iran, North Caucasus, Transcaucasus and Turkey (POWO 2024 ). The FCM of ten plants from three populations from Georgia revealed a single cytotype, identified as diploid (2n = 16, Fig. S1 O), confirming the previous diploid records from Georgia (Gagnidze et al. 2015 ) and Armenia (e.g. Pogosian 1983 , Table S2 ). Vakhtina and Kudryashova (1985) also report a tetraploid count from Armenia. Our AGS estimate for three populations of diploids was very narrow, around 2C = 32.4 pg (Table 1). There is only one previous AGS report by FEM (2C = 35.1 pg) for diploids of unknown origin by Vakhtina et al. ( 1977 ), which is rather closer to our AGS of A. karsianum . Allium macedonicum Zahar . – This rare species is reported to occur in the Pangaion Hills (NE Greece), from where it was described (Zahariadi 1975 ), and NC Greece (Dimopoulos et al. 2023 ). A specimen from a locality in the southern part of North Macedonia, close to known distribution range, has 2C = 28.9 pg, which could be considered as DNA-diploid, based on the only diploid (2n = 16) chromosome report (Papanicolaou 1984 ) and the similarity of the AGS value with that of the related species of the A. paniculatum L. group (Table 1). Allium melanantherum Pančić . – This rare Balkan endemic species occurs in Bulgaria, Serbia, Kosovo, North Macedonia and northern Greece (Anderson 1991; Anačkov 2009 ; Assyov et al. 2012 ; Teofilovski 2021 ; Dimopoulos et al. 2023 ; POWO 2024 ). The FCM of 14 plants from two nearby populations in the Rila Mts (Bulgaria) revealed a single cytotype, identified as triploid (2n = 24, Fig. S1 P). Our chromosome count confirms previous triploid records (some of which indicate the presence of 0–1 B chromosomes) from Bulgaria, from which diploids (2n = 16) and tetraploids (2n = 32) have also been reported (Cheshmedzhiev 1970 , 1971 , 1976 , 1979 , 1992 ). Triploids have also been reported from northern Greece (Tzanoudakis and Vosa 1988 , Table S2 ). Our AGS estimate is the first for triploids (Table 1). Previously, AGS of tetraploids (2C = 47.5 pg) was estimated using FEM (Ohri et al. 1998 ; Ohri and Pistrick 2001 ). The 1Cx value of tetraploids were found to be lower than that of triploids (Fig. 4 , Table). Allium oporinanthum Brullo, Pavone & Salmeri . – The species is considered a northwestern Mediterranean species, occurring in Spain, France (Brullo et al. 1997a ) and the Aosta Valley in the northwestern Italy (Rey et al. 2015 ). The FCM of 65 plants from 11 populations revealed a single cytotype, which was identified as tetraploid (2n = 32, Table 1, Fig. S1 Q), confirming previous tetraploid records from several localities in Spain and France (Brullo et al. 1997a ; Jauzein and Tison 2001 ). The range of RGS and AGS values were relatively narrow, and our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table 1). Allium orestis Kalpoutz., Trigas & Constantin . – The species was described from the Parnon Mt and Taigetos Mt of the southern Peloponnese, Greece (Kalpoutzakis et al. 2012 ). The FCM of nine plants from the locus classicus resulted in a single cytotype, which was identified as diploid (2n = 16) by the authors of the species description (Kalpoutzakis et al. 2012 ). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table 1). Allium pallens L. – Widespread semi-ruderal species in the Mediterranean (Brullo et al. 2003 ). FCM of 121 plants from 19 populations, clearly matching the species description in Brullo et al. ( 2003 ), yielded a single cytotype identified as tetraploid (2n = 32, Table 1, Fig. S1 R). Our chromosome counts confirm previous tetraploid records from several European, Turkish and north-African localities (e.g. Jauzein and Tison 2001 ; Brullo et al. 2003 ; Fig. 1 F), frequently referred under the names A. coppoleri Tineo or A. stearnii Pastor & Valdés (Table S2 ). Reported diploid records (2n = 16, Table S2 ), e.g. from Spain (e.g. Pastor 1982 ; Ruíz Rejón et al. 1980 , 1986 ), Greece (Karavokyrou and Tzanoudakis 1991 ) and Turkey (Ved Brat 1965 ) likely belong to other, presently unidentifiable, species and require further study, owing to frequent misidentification or misinterpretation of the species (Brullo et al. 2003 ), and are not presented in the map (Fig. 1 F). The range of RGS and AGS values of tetraploids was relatively wide, with a clear increase towards the northwest (RGS: latitude: r s = 0.515, P = 0.029; longitude: r s = -0.492, P = 0.038; Fig. 2 D, Fig. S2 H). The AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table 1). Allium praescissum Rchb . – The species is distributed from east of the Dnieper River in Ukraine to western Siberia and typically occurs on saline soils (Dobrochaeva et al. 1999 ; Seregin 2007 ; Sinitsina 2019 ). The FCM of eight plants from a Russian population revealed a single cytotype. Despite the lack of chromosome counts for these plants, we classify them as DNA-diploids, based on the similarity of our AGS estimates (2C = 31.6 pg, Table 1) to the karyologically verified nuclear DNA content using FEM (2n = 16, 2C = 28.5 pg) by Vakhtina et al. ( 1977 ). Zakirova and Nafanailova ( 1988 ) reported diploids also from Kazakhstan (Table S2 ). Allium pseudostamineum Kollmann & Shmida . – This endemic species is native to Israel, Syria and Lebanon (Brullo et al. 2007 ; POWO 2024 ) and was described from Mt. Hermon in the Anti-Lebanon Mts (Kollmann and Shmida 1977 ). FCM analysis of a single plant from the population between the peaks of Mt. Habushic and Mt. Hermon (Israel) revealed a single cytotype, identified as a DNA-diploid, consistent with the previous report of 2n = 16 from the type locality (Shmida and Kollmann 1977 ). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table 1). Allium rhodopeum Velen . – This rare species is native to Bulgaria, Serbia, North Macedonia, Albania, Greece and Turkey (Brullo et al. 1998 ; Barina and Pifko 2011; Nikolov 2021 ; POWO 2024 ). The FCM of 31 plants from five populations sampled in Bulgaria and Greece revealed a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n = 16, Table 1, Fig. S1 S). This confirms previous diploid records from other regions of Bulgaria (Cheshmedzhiev 1970 , 1973 ), Greece (Brullo et al. 1998 ) and Turkey (Özhatay 1990 , 1993 ). Ricci ( 1965 ) published tetraploid count (2n = 32) in a plant of unknown origin but we omit this count due to uncertainty of the species determination. Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table 1). Allium rupestre Steven – The species occurs in Crimea, Turkey and Caucasus (Vvedensky 1935 ; POWO 2024 ). The FCM of 23 plants from six populations sampled in Georgia and Crimea revealed four distinct RGS/AGS groups. Most of our AGS estimates are the first for the species (Table 1). Three groups with increasing AGS mean of 2C = 22.3, 29.0 and 42.9 pg probably represent a polyploid series with basic chromosome number x = 7 and chromosome numbers 2n = 2 x = 14, 2n = 3 x = 21 and 2n = 4 x = 28, respectively (Fig. S1 T, U, V). The 2n = 14 is most likely the first such count for the species. However, Vakhtina and Kudryashova (1985) commented on the possibility that a count of 2n = 14 for A. kunthianum by Vakhtina ( 1964 ) might actually belong to A. rupestre . Chromosome counts of 2n = 21 and 2n = 28 have already been published for individuals sampled in the Crimea (Ukraine) and the foothills of the Caucasus (Georgia), respectively (Vakhtina and Kudryashova 1985). Another group with an AGS of 2C = 38.6 pg, intermediate between the AGS of the tri- and tetraploids (see above) is represented by plants from a population originating from Georgia (Table 1), for which we counted 2n = 24 (Fig. S1 W). A very similar nuclear DNA amount (2C = 37.8 pg) was also measured for plants originating from the other Georgian locality (Borjomi), from which a chromosome number 2n = 24 was previously reported (Ohri et al. 1998 ; Ohri and Pistrick 2001 ). The authors consider this chromosome count to be triploid, based on x = 8 and two diploid reports (2n = 16) from Armenia (Pogosian 1990) and Turkey (Özhatay 1993 ). These rare records suggest a rather complicated evolution within the species and require more detailed research over the whole Caucasian region. Allium telmatum Bogdanović, Brullo, Giusso & Salmeri . – The species is endemic to the northwestern Croatian coast (Bogdanović et al. 2009 ). The FCM of ten plants from one population revealed a single cytotype identified as tetraploid (2n = 32, Fig. S1 S). Our chromosome count confirms previous records from two localities (Bogdanović et al. 2009 ) close to newly sampled locality. Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table 1). Allium tenuiflorum Ten . – This Mediterranean species is reported to occur in southern Europe from southeastern France to Bulgaria and in Libya (POWO 2024 ). However, the species is critical because of its morphological similarity to some other species such as A. pallens and A. dentiferum (Jauzein and Tison 2001 ; Brullo et al. 2003 ). The taxonomic status of the eastern Balkan populations (e.g. Bulgaria) also requires further study. FCM of 24 plants from five populations sampled at the southern edge of its range in Italy (cf. Brullo et al. 2003 ) and 12 plants from two localities in Croatia (Istria, N Dalmatia) yielded a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n = 16, Table 1, Fig. S1 Y), confirming previous diploid records (rarely with 1–6 B chromosomes) from Italy (e.g. Marcucci and Tornadore 1994 ; Jauzein and Tison 2001 ; Brullo et al. 2003 ; Peruzzi 2003 ; Tornadore and Marcucci 2005 ), Croatia (Puizina et al. 1997 ) and Bulgaria (Cheshmedzhiev 1975c ). In addition, Fernandes and Queiros (1971) also reported diploid count, but for a plant of unknown origin, so this count must be considered doubtful. Apart from diploids, there are two records of triploids, one from Hyères in southern France (Jauzein and Tison 2001 ) and one from Apulia in southern Italy (Tornadore 1981 ). The pentaploids (2n = 40) reported by Vosa ( 1976 ) from central Italy clearly belong to another species, most probably A. dentiferum . The ranges of RGS and AGS of the diploids we analysed were wide, with a weak tendency of Croatian populations towards slightly higher GS compared to Italian populations (Table S1 ). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table 1). Allium valdesianum Brullo, Pavone & Salmeri . – The species is endemic to the alpine belt of Sierra Nevada Mts in Spain (Brullo et al. 1996b ). The FCM of five plants from a population in the northwestern part of the Sierra Nevada Mts revealed a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n = 16, Fig. S1 Z), in agreement with the only previous diploid record from the locus classicus (Brullo et al. 1996b ), which is almost identical to our locality. Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table 1). Ploidy variation and frequency in Allium sect. Codonoprasum : overview The issue of high chromosomal variation in the genus Allium has long been of interest since the benchmarking studies of Levan ( 1931 , 1933 ). A recent review found that only 3.2% of Allium species are pure polyploids (exclusively 4 x ), but almost 30.2% of species within the genus show intraspecific variation in ploidy levels, up to eight ploidies (2 x -10 x ; Han et al. 2020 ). However, only a subset of species of A . sect. Codonoprasum , sometimes even with inaccurate cytotype composition, was included in Han’s review. Almost half of the taxa (i.e. 44%) we screened using FCM were polyploid or di-&polyploid, with tetraploids/DNA-tetraploids being the most common polyploid cytotype (Table 1). The synthesis of our new data (Table S1 ) and the published chromosomal/DNA-ploidy data for 160 recognised taxa of A. sect. Codonoprasum (Tables S2, S4, all taxa summarised in Table S5 ) showed that 32 species (20.0% of total) have no data on their ploidy. Moreover, many older chromosome number records in specimens assigned by the given authors especially to members of the A. paniculatum complex (e.g. A. paniculatum L., A. fuscum Waldst. & Kit.) should be considered with caution or even excluded due to species misconception/misidentification (Salmeri et al. 2016 ; Vojtěchová et al. 2023 ; see Table S4 for details). Considering only reliable records of taxa with at least one chromosome record (128 taxa), diploid taxa are dominant (71.1%), while di-&polyploid and pure polyploid taxa are less common, occurring at similar frequencies of 12.5% and 16.4%, respectively (Fig. 3 A). After excluding taxa that were recently transferred to another section according to Özhatay and Koçyiğit ( 2019 ), 80 out of 116 taxa with at least one chromosome count are diploid (69.0%), 16 di-&polyploid (13.8%) and 20 polyploid only (17.2%, Fig. 3 B). While proportion of diploid species is consistent with the overall pattern observed in the entire genus Allium (Han et al. 2020 ), proportion of di-&polyploid and polyploid taxa within the A . sect. Codonoprasum is apparently different from those found by Han et al. ( 2020 ). We explain these differences by using a narrower and more critical species concept and more detailed survey in our study compared to Han et al. ( 2020 ). Detailed insight into ploidy composition in di-&polyploid and polyploid taxa shows that 4 x , 3 x , 2 x + 3 x and 2 x + 3 x + 4 x taxa are dominant, while frequencies of other ploidies and/or their combinations are rare (Fig. 3 C, Table S5 ), e.g. pentaploid A. pseudotelmatum Duchoslav & Jandová, hexaploid A. exaltatum (Meikle) Brullo, Pavone, Salmeri & Venora, and up to hexaploid A. flavum subsp. tauricum . Allium oleraceum L. shows the most intriguing ploidy composition ranging from tri- to octoploids (for details Duchoslav et al. 2020 ). This contrasts with Han et al. ( 2020 ), who found the 2 x + 4 x combination to be the most common (46.3%) within di-&polyploid and polyploid Allium species. In addition, our synthesis adds some new cytotype combinations not covered by Han et al. ( 2020 ), suggesting a high diversity of cytotype composition within A . sect. Codonoprasum . It also shows that the true proportion of mixed ploidy species may be underestimated due to the sample-size limitations of classical chromosome counting (Duchoslav et al. 2020 ), and mixed populations may not be detected at all, although reports of different cytotypes coexisting in the same regions in several taxa (Tables S1, S2, S4) might suggest this. In this respect, the use of more convenient and efficient FCM is beneficial (Siljak-Yakovlev et al. 2020 ; Sliwinska et al. 2022 ), although its use within the genus is still scarce (but see Duchoslav et al. 2010 , 2013 , 2020 ; Vojtěchová et al. 2023 , 2024 ). However, contrary to our expectations (Fig. 3 ), we recorded only four mixed-ploidy populations, representing 1.3% of the populations analysed, and in only two taxa, A. carinatum subsp. carinatum and A. flavum subsp. flavum (Table S1 ). Adding previously published population-level ploidy data (Table S4 ), only three other taxa in the section ( A. oleraceum , A. paniculatum , A. marginatum Janka) had reported ploidy-mixed populations. Apart from the unique A. oleraceum with complex ploidy structure of populations (Duchoslav et al. 2010 , 2020 ), only 2 x + 3 x and 2 x + 4 x populations were rarely found in the above four mentioned taxa (Table S4 ), which is far below the average percentage (16.1%) of populations with multiple cytotypes found in 39 mixed-ploidy species (Kolář et al. 2017 ). However, in contrast to our study, the majority of studies reviewed by Kolář et al. ( 2017 ) were specifically designed to detect within-population ploidy diversity by sampling a high number of individuals per population (16 vs. 5 on average, Kolář et al. 2017 vs. our study) and extensively covering the entire area of the population, which has been shown to increase the probability of detecting multiple ploidies (Duchoslav et al. 2020 ). Therefore, the combination of intensive within-population sampling and FCM may increase the frequency of mixed-ploidy populations, especially within the taxa with increased vegetative reproduction (bulbils, bulblets), which may help different cytotypes to overcome the process of minority cytotype exclusion in local sympatry (Herben et al. 2017 ; Kolář et al. 2017 ). The spatial pattern of ploidy diversity of taxa from A . sect. Codonoprasum across Europe and adjacent regions is shown in Fig. 3 D. Diploid taxa dominate in the eastern Mediterranean, where they represent more than 85% of all taxa with counted chromosome numbers. The proportion of diploid taxa gradually decreases both westwards and northwards, with only polyploid taxa present in northern and northwestern Europe. The dominance and diversity of diploid taxa in the Eastern Mediterranean and the adjacent Irano-Turanian region are explained by the fact that these regions are considered as genus/section evolutionary centres (Hanelt 1996 ; Fritsch and Friesen 2002 ; Friesen et al. 2006 ), from which the ancestors of extant species migrated westward in the past, e.g. across newly opened dry environments during the Messinian salinity crisis (Krijgsman et al. 1999; Trájer et al. 2021 ), followed by evolution in isolation of newly colonised regions after the marine transgression at the end of the Tertiary (Garcia-Castellanos et al. 2009 ). This east-west phylogeographical break has frequently been inferred, and sometimes dated in various plant groups (Nieto Feliner 2014 ). Several authors (e.g., Bogdanović et al. 2009 ; Salmeri et al. 2016 ) hypothesised this scenario as very likely in autumn-flowering taxa of A . sect. Codonoprasum , where all but one ( A. apolloniensis Biel et al.) extant taxa in Eastern Mediterranean are diploid while those occurring westward are (paleo-)polyploids (Brullo et al. 1997b ; Bogdanović et al. 2009 ; Özhatay et al. 2018 ), with both groups forming different subclades in the concatenated nr-ITS and cp-DNA tree (Salmeri et al. 2016 ). A high proportion of diploid taxa, often endemic, is also associated with regions of climatic, geological and topographical complexity with less harmful glaciation effects during the Quaternary (Hughes and Woodward 2017 ; Noroozi et al. 2019 ), e.g. Turkey and Greece but also southern Italy and Sicily (Peruzzi et al. 2015 ). This scenario is considered to be the most parsimonious explanation of high species diversity and endemism in many species’ complexes in the Mediterranean region (Nieto Feliner 2014 ). On the other hand, more northern regions of Europe are dominated by di-&polyploid or only polyploid taxa of the section (Fig. 3 D) or higher ploidies (Fig. 1 C, F), and also the most widespread taxa of the section are polyploids (e.g. A. oleraceu m, Duchoslav et al. 2020 ; A. dentiferum , A. pallens ; see Fig. 1 C,D). Observed increase of polyploid taxa towards north fits well with the common pattern observed worldwide (Rice et al. 2019 ) and reflect the strong influence of the Quaternary glacial cycles on the flora of central and northern Europe (Hewitt 1999 ), as well as the adaptive advantage of polyploidisation and hybridisation within the section (Duchoslav et al. 2020 ), which might resulted from secondary contacts during postglacial range expansions (Schmitt 2007 ). The high proportion of polyploid and mixed-ploidy taxa within the section is considered a sign of ongoing diversification (Tzanoudakis and Vosa 1985; Hanelt 1996 ), which is likely to have played a role in the ecological radiation of A . sect. Codonoprasum into newly emerging habitats, especially those with mesic climates and/or fertile conditions, as demonstrated by Han et al. ( 2020 ) for the genus Allium . Indeed, many widely distributed polyploid taxa of this section dominate in mesic and/or fertile, frequently anthropogenic, disturbed habitats (Brullo et al. 2008 ; Duchoslav et al. 2020 ; Vojtěchová et al. 2024 ). Also, relatively high frequency of odd ploidy taxa/levels within taxa (especially 3x) observed within the section is uncommon in polyploid plants (Kolář et al. 2017 ) because odd ploidy causes meiotic irregularities leading to a reduction of the seed set and thus fitness of newly emerging polyploid (Ramsey and Schemske 1998 , 2002 ). However, polyploid members of the section either form or increase their vegetative reproduction via production of aerial bulbils or underground bulblets (e.g. triploid A. corsicum , Jauzein et al. 2002 ; polyploid A. oleraceu m, Fialová and Duchoslav 2014 ), which allow them to establish, persist within a site and disperse to new areas (Hörandl 2009 ) and thus overcome reproductive constraints. Robust data explaining the origin of di-&polyploid and polyploid A. sect. Codonoprasum species are limited and mostly based on interpretation of mitotic chromosome arrangements (e.g. Pastor 1982 ; Bogdanović et al. 2011 ) or GS (e.g. Vojtěchová et al. 2023 , 2024 ). Therefore, the origin of most of these taxa is generally not clarified, but only outlined in literature, and both evolutionary pathways of polyploid formation (auto- and allopolyploidy) are briefly discussed. For example, some tetraploid species are considered to be either autotetraploid (e.g. A. occultum Tzanoud. & Trigas; Tzanoudakis and Trigas 2015 ) or allotetraploid (e.g. A. apergii Trigas, Iatroú & Tzanoud.; Trigas et al. 2010 ). For some di-&polyploid species containing tri- and/or tetraploids in addition to diploids (e.g. A. paniculatum , A. marginatum ), autopolyploid origin is postulated based on both GS and molecular markers (Vojtěchová et al. 2023 ), whereas for polyploid 4 x -5 x A. dentiferum and 3 x -8 x A. oleraceum allopolyploid origin is most likely (Brullo et al. 2008 ; Duchoslav et al. 2020 and references therein). Rare dysploidy in A. rupestre Traditionally, several basic chromosome numbers have been distinguished within the genus Allium , ranging from x = 7 to x = 11 (Jones and Rees 1968 ; Friesen et al. 2006 ). The most common is x = 8, which is dominant in the majority of subgenera (Fritsch et al. 2010 ), including the subgenus Allium (Ved Brat 1965 ; Peruzzi et al. 2017 ; Han et al. 2020 ), and has also been inferred as the ancestral basic chromosome number by ancestral state reconstruction (Peruzzi et al. 2017 ). Consistent with previous knowledge, all but one of the species we analysed had x = 8. When studying A. rupestre populations, we found, besides 2n = 24, corresponding to 3 x with x = 8, a polyploid series 2 x– 3 x –4 x with 2n = 14, 21 and 28 (see also Vakhtina and Kudryashova 1985). So far, these results indicate a descending dysploidy leading to x = 7, which is very unusual for members of A . sect. Codonoprasum , as well as for the subgenus Allium (Mathew 1996 ; Peruzzi et al. 2017 ; Babin and Bell 2022 ), where only a few dysploid ( x = 7) species are known, e.g. from the A. sect. Cupanioscordum Ceschm. (Brullo et al. 2015 ; Trigas et al. 2017 ), which is sister to the A . sect. Codonoprasum (Li et al. 2010 ). General patterns of GS variation within the Allium sect. Codonoprasum Our work represents the first comprehensive study of GS in A. sect. Codonoprasum , increasing by 78% the number of taxa for which GS is now known (Leitch et al. 2019 ). AGS estimation revealed a 2.6-fold difference in nuclear DNA content, ranging from 2C = 22.3 pg, which is the lowest known AGS within this section, to 2C = 58.5 pg (Table 1, Fig. 4 A). Previously, Jones and Rees ( 1968 ) reported an even lower 2C value (18.4 pg) than the lowest we measured within this section, but this record certainly belongs to other species, probably from another section (Vojtěchová et al. 2023 ). Adding previous AGS records of other measured species in this section (Leitch et al. 2019 ), including the highly polyploid A. oleraceum (Duchoslav et al. 2013 ), this difference is even larger, up to 4.1-fold, with the maximum known 2C = 92.1 pg in octoploid A. oleraceum (Fig. 4 A, Table S3 ). This variation covers most of the known range of AGS in the whole genus (Fig. 4 A inset), with the exception of several species from other sections that either have lower AGS, with the lowest AGS (2C = 15.2–16.9 pg) found in A. schoenoprasum L. (Jones and Rees 1968 ; Baranyi and Greilhuber 1999 ), or an extremely high AGS record in A. validum S. Watson (2C = 148.9 pg, Ohri et al. 1996). The AGS of the analysed section members indicate that the section belongs to the plant groups with either large or very large GS sensu Leitch et al. ( 1998 ). The observed GS variation in A. sect. Codonoprasum is mainly due to polyploidy (Fig. 4 A), which has a strong influence on the genus evolution (e.g. Friesen 1992 ; Hanelt et al. 1992 ; Gurushidze et al. 2012 ; Han et al. 2020 ; Wang et al. 2023 ), but is also crucial for ecological radiation in Allium (Wu et al. 2010 ; Han et al. 2020 ; Wang et al. 2023 ). Increased chromosome number due to polyploidy resulted in higher 2C values but lower 1Cx values in all but two cases of single ploidy in two taxa examined that were represented by multiple ploidy levels (Fig. 4 A,B). As previously documented, polyploid formation is often associated with DNA loss, such that polyploids often exhibit lower 1Cx values compared to their diploid/low ploidy relatives. This genome reduction may be a mechanism that promotes the success of autopolyploid/allopolyploid speciation (e.g. Ozkan et al. 2003 ; Leitch and Bennett 2004 ; Poggio et al. 2014 ; Wang et al. 2021 ). Notable differences in the difference between 1Cx values of di- and tetraploids observed in some diploid-polyploid taxa (e.g. A. flavum versus A. carinatum ) may be related to the age of the polyploids, with a small decrease in 1Cx typical of very young polyploids (neopolyploids), where processes leading to genome downsizing have not yet taken place (Ekrt et al. 2010 ; Bressler et al. 2017 ; Wang et al. 2021 ; Pungaršek and Frajman 2024 ). This may also explain why the 2C values of some (neoauto-)triploids, e.g. in A. paniculatum and A. marginatum (Fig. 4 B, see Vojtěchová et al. 2023 for discussion), are similar to those of tetraploids of other species, despite the similarity of 2C values between the respective diploids (Fig. 4 B). Alternatively, some of such tetraploid cytotypes might represent allopolyploids, which originated by polyploidization of hybrids between diploid species with different 2C values. In A. rupestre ( x = 7), tetraploids had a higher 1Cx than triploids, but this may be related to the effect of dysploidy observed in this species (see above). GS variation in Allium may also be affected by phylogenetic signal (Wang et al. 2023 ), suggesting that GS evolution may reflect phylogenetic relationships (e.g. Weiss-Schneeweiss et al. 2006 ; Chrtek et al. 2009 ; Hutang et al. 2023 ). Unfortunately, only a limited number of A . sect. Codonoprasum members have been sequenced, which, together with the limited number of GS estimates available, currently precludes full reconstruction of GS evolution along the phylogeny. Two main clades [A, B] have been identified in the limited number of accessions of A . sect. Codonoprasum analysed so far using ITS and/or the combined ITS and trnH-psbA dataset (Fig. 6 in Salmeri et al. 2016 ; Fig. 2 in Vojtěchová et al. 2024 ). Interestingly, when mapping the available 2C values of diploid members of both clades onto these phylogenetic trees, diploid species with larger genomes (2C > 27 pg, Fig. 4 A) and smaller genomes (with 2C 12 pg (e.g. A. flavum , A. paniculatum ) are placed in the A clade, whereas those with 1Cx < 12 pg (e.g. A. dentiferum , A. pallens , A. tenuiflorum ) are included in the B clade. Any further consideration of the ancestral state and possible direction of GS evolution in the two main clades will require additional sequencing, as the current trees may be limited by incomplete taxon sampling. Intraspecific intra-ploidy variation in GS and its ecological and taxonomic consequences Traditionally considered to be a stable trait at the plant species level (Ohri 1998 ), GS can actually exhibit significant intraspecific variability among individuals and populations (Šmarda and Bureš 2010 ). Published chromosome/karyotype reports suggest that the higher intra-ploidy GS variation found in some taxa (e.g. A. flavu m, Vujošević et al. 2013 ) could be partly explained by changes at the chromosomal level via aneuploidy or the presence of accessory B chromosomes. However, supernumerary chromosomes have only a minor effect on individual GS, and even less on plants with higher GS (Levin et al. 2005 ; Chumová et al. 2016 ; but see Leitch et al. 2009 ), which is the case in Allium species. The primary mechanism contributing to genome expansion is the proliferation of transposable elements within a given ploidy level (Feschotte and Pritham 2007 ; Lisch 2013 ). On the other hand, losses in DNA content often result from unequal homologous recombination or illegitimate recombination events (Bennetzen 2005). Such observed variation may indicate the response of GS to environmental constraints along ecogeographic gradients (Knight et al. 2005 ) or during the range expansion/invasion (Guo et al. 2024 ), accompanied by drift (Cang et al. 2024 ). Alternatively, intraspecific GS variation could reflect a complex evolutionary history of the taxon under study (Loureiro et al. 2010 ) due to unrecognised phylogenetic components (Greilhuber 1998 , 2005 ). We recorded considerable intraspecific intra-ploidy GS variation for several taxa (e.g., A. carinatum , A. flavum , Table 1, Fig. 2 , Fig. 4 A,B), for which we gathered samples along substantial parts of their geographical range. Longitude, which can be considered a surrogate for the continental climate gradient in Europe (Mikolaskova 2009 ) and a measure of the growing season and water availability (Berg et al. 2017 ), appeared to be the most frequent factor correlated with GS in our dataset. However, we did not observe consistent relationships between GS variation and geography, both between taxa and between-ploidy within taxa, consistent with patterns previously observed in A. oleraceum (Duchoslav et al. 2013 ). It can be conducted that the observed intraspecific intra-ploidy GS variation in the studied Allium taxa is likely to be complex and idiosyncratic to each taxon, probably reflecting phylogenetic heterogeneity (Rešetnik et al. 2014 ), as well as past processes associated with range shifts during the Holocene, or survival in refugia where several lineages may have evolved in isolation (Nieto Feliner 2014 ; Horák et al. 2023 ). Therefore, both selection and drift may have influenced the evolution of divergent GS in topographically complex and ecologically divergent landscapes (Griffiths et al. 2004 ), such as the Balkan Peninsula (Španiel and Rešetnik 2022 ). Similar results were previously obtained, for example, by Frajman et al. ( 2015 ) for representatives of Knautia L. and Terlević et al. ( 2022 ) for Dianthus sylvestris Wulfen. Longitudinal gradients in GS observed within some widely distributed Allium taxa might also reflect westward migration in the past, as discussed above. Future studies should focus on these taxa to ascertain whether there is a strong correlation between intraspecific GS variation and phylogeny, and to determine whether any taxonomic conclusions can be drawn. Similarly, but at the interspecific level, Wang et al. ( 2023 ) found no significant relationship between GS and 19 bioclimatic variables in the 62 Allium species from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau in China. Also, Veselý et al. ( 2012 ), analysing 219 European geophytic species, found no relationship between GS and Pignatti's indicators of continentality, moisture and temperature, with only a tendency for species with very high GS to avoid water-stressed environments. Indeed, in the Allium species we studied, taxa with very high GS (2C > 40 pg, polyploids only) usually inhabit less stressful, often man-made habitats with higher nutrient availability (i.e. arable fields, vineyards, road ditches, moist grasslands, secondary forests; e.g. Brullo et al. 2008 ; Duchoslav et al. 2020 , see discussion above), representing new niches for Allium polyploids (Hanelt 1996 ). GS as an extra taxonomic character for species identification? FCM has repeatedly proven beneficial in biosystematic research (e.g. Zonneveld 2001 ; Castro et al. 2012 ; Lepší et al. 2019 ; Popelka et al. 2019 ; Kobrlová et al. 2022 ), and GS is considered an efficient tool for taxa discrimination, especially in morphologically challenging groups (e.g. Prančl et al. 2018 ; Sochor et al. 2019 ). We have also found GS useful in combination with classical karyology within the A . sect. Codonoprasum , despite the observed intrataxon variation in GS that we found for some species (see above). An illustrative example could be the morphologically similar triplet A. tenuiflorum/A. dentiferum / A. pallens , where A. tenuiflorum is the only diploid and the rest are polyploids, i.e. A. dentiferum : 4 x , 5 x and A. pallens : 4 x . Despite the presence of the same ploidy level (4 x ), these two latter species differ in AGS/RGS with no overlap (Table 1, Fig. 4 A). In our pilot screening, we also found a difference in GS between two often barely distinguishable related diploid species occurring in the same area, A. karsianum and A. kunthianum (Table 1). Moreover, FCM was also effective in distinguishing between closely related and morphologically very similar diploid species of the A. paniculatum complex (Fig. 4 A, Table 1, see Vojtěchová et al. 2023 for details). Furthermore, FCM could also be potentially promising for the revision of the A. stamineum complex ( sensu Brullo et al. 2007 ), as members measured by FCM differ in 1Cx values. As precise genetic identification is required for further taxonomic assessment of such complexes, FCM may facilitate their delimitation. Conclusion This study showed the advantage of FCM for ploidy screening and estimation of GS in the A . sect. Codonoprasum . Genome size should be used regularly as an extra taxonomic character that allow to differentiate between closely related taxa, could help to detect and/or resolve the taxonomic heterogeneity of some species groups within the genus Allium and to identify poorly developed individuals (i.e., reduce misidentifications, see Salmeri et al. 2016 ; Vojtěchová et al. 2023 ). However, our population-based FCM data also clearly showed that there is an urgent need to cover as much of the geographic range of the taxa studied as possible in order to find out if variation in ploidy and GS is occurring and what the causes are. This will be of great value for future phylogenetic assessments of this taxonomically complex group. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable Consent for publication Not applicable Availability of data and material All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files] Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Funding We acknowledged several projects during which we had a possibility to sample wild Allium populations (Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, grant numbers 206/04/P115, 206/09/1126). Kateřina Vojtěchová was supported by internal grants from Palacky University (IGA_PrF_2023_001, 2024_001). Authors' contributions The design of the research was taken care by M.D. The performance of the research – sampling was taken care by M.D. with a contribution of all authors. L.K., M.J. and L.Š. Data analysis was taken care by M.D. with a contribution of L.K. and K.V. The writing of the manuscript was taken care by M.D. and L.K. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements We thank particularly the many sample contributors mentioned in the supplement (Table S1), namely Roman Kalous, Bohumil Trávníček, Michal Hroneš, Martin Dančák, Alena Lepší, Michal Sochor, František Krahulec, Radim Vašut, David Horák, Ivan Moysiyenko, Vojtěch Taraška, Jiří Ohryzek, Miloslav Kitner, and others. Without their enthusiasm and help, we will not be able to gather such a large collection. We would like to thank Alena Fišerová (Váňová) for providing us with data from her master's thesis. We also thank Ori Fragman-Sapir (Botanical Garden Jerusalem, Israel) for his valuable advice on sampling in Israel. Salvatore Brullo (University of Catania, Italy), Dimitris Tzanoudakis (University of Patras, Greece) and Sandro Bogdanović (University of Zagreb, Croatia) are acknowledged for their consultations concerning the taxonomic identity of some populations sampled by us. Mihai Pușkaș (Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca) and Adam Kantor (Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava) are acknowledged for consultation on distribution of selected taxa in Romania and Slovakia, respectively. References Aedo C (2013) Allium L. In: Rico E, Crespo MB, Quintanar A, Herrero A, Aedo C (eds.) Flora Iberica, Vol. 20, Liliaceae-Agavaceae. Editorial CSIC, Madrid, pp. 220–273. Afonso A, Loureiro J, Arroyo J, Olmedo-Vicente E, Castro S (2021) Cytogenetic diversity in the polyploid complex Linum suffruticosum s.l . (Linaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 195:216–232. doi:10.1093/botlinnean/boaa060 Alden B (1976) Floristic reports from the high mountains of Pindhos, Greece. Bot Not 129:297–321. Anačkov G (2009) Taxonomy and chorology of genus Allium L. 1754 (Amaryllidales, Alliaceae) in Serbia. Dissertation, University of Novi Sad, Serbia. Andersson IA (1991) Allium L. In: Strid A, Tan K (eds.) Mountain Flora of Greece, 2. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 701–714. Assyov B, Petrova A, Dimitrov D, Vassilev R (2012) Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora. Distribution maps and floristic elements, ed. 4. Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation, Sofia. Babin CH, Bell CD (2022) Evolution of chromosome number in wild onions ( Allium , Amaryllidaceae). Syst Bot 47:335–346. doi:10.1600/036364422X16512564801678 Baranyi M, Greilhuber J (1999) Genome size in Allium : In quest of reproducible data. Ann Bot 83:687–695. doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.0871 Barina Z, Pifkó D (2011) Contributions to the flora of Albania, 2. Willdenowia 41:139–149. doi:10.3372/wi.41.41118 Bartolucci F, Peruzzi L, Galasso G, et al (2024) A second update to the checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. Plant Biosyst 158:219–296.doi:10.1080/11263504.2024.2320126 Becher H, Powell RF, Brown MR, et al (2021) The nature of intraspecific and interspecific genome size variation in taxonomically complex eyebrights. Ann Bot 128:639–651. doi:10.1093/aob/mcab102 Bennetzen JL, Ma J, Devos KM (2005) Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. Ann Bot 95: 127–132. doi:10.1093/aob/mci008 Berg C, Welk E, Jäger EJ (2017) Revising Ellenberg’s indicator values for continentality based on global vascular plant species distribution. Appl Veg Sci 20:482–493. doi: 10.1111/avsc.12306 Bitomský M, Kobrlová L, Hroneš M et al (2022) Stoichiometry versus ecology: the relationships between genome size and guanine–cytosine content, and tissue nitrogen and phosphorus in grassland herbs. Ann Bot 130:189–197. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac079 Bitomský M, Martíková J, Lubbe FC et al (2023) Genome size is strongly linked to carbohydrate storage and weakly linked to root sprouting ability in herbs. Ann Bot 132:1021–1032. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad158 Blommaert J (2020) Genome size evolution: towards new model systems for old questions. Proc Royal Soc B. 287:20201441. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1441 Bogdanović S, Brullo S, Mitić B et al (2008) A new species of Allium (Alliaceae) from Dalmatia, Croatia. Bot J Linn Soc 158:106–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2008.00790.x Bogdanović S, Brullo S, Giusso del Galdo G et al (2009) A new autumn-flowering species of Allium (Alliaceae) from Croatia. Folia Geobot 44:83–93. doi: 10.1007/s12224-009-9032-2 Bogdanović S, Brullo C, Brullo et al (2011) Allium achaium Boiss. (Alliaceae), a critical species of Greek flora. Candollea 66:57–64. doi: 10.15553/c2011v661a3 Bösen H, Nagl W (1978) Short duration of the mitotic and endomitotic cell cycle in the heterochromatin-rich monocot Allium carinatum . Cell Biol Int Rep 2:565–571. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(78)90065-6 Bourge M, Brown SC, Siljak-Yakovlev S (2018) Flow cytometry as tool in plant sciences, with emphasis on genome size and ploidy level assessment. Genetics & Applications 2:1–12. doi: 10.31383/ga.vol2iss2pp1-12. Bressler S, Klatte-Asselmeyer V, Fischer A et al (2017) Variation in genome size in the Valeriana officinalis complex resulting from multiple chromosomal evolutionary processes. Preslia 89:41–61. doi: 10.23855/preslia.2017.041 Brullo S, Guarino R (2017) Allium L. – Aglio. In: Pignatti S (ed) Flora d’Italia, ed. 2. Edagricole di New Business Media, Bologna, pp 238–269. Brullo S, Guglielmo A, Pavone P et al (2003) Cytotaxonomical remarks on Allium pallens and its relationships with A. convallarioides (Alliaceae). Bocconea 16:557–571.: Brullo S, Guglielmo A, Pavone P et al (2007) Cytotaxonomic considerations on Allium stamineum Boiss. group (Alliaceae). Bocconea 21:325–343. Brullo S, Guglielmo A, Pavone P (2008) Taxonomical remarks on Allium dentiferum and its relationships with allied species. Taxon 57:243–253. doi: 10.2307/25065965 Brullo S, Guglielmo A, Terrasi MC (1998) Notes on Allium rhodopeum (Alliaceae), a neglected species from the E Mediterranean area. Plant Biosyst 132:63–69. doi: 10.1080/11263504.1998.10654192 Brullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (1991) Cytotaxonomical notes on Allium dentiferum Webb & Berthelot, an unknown species of the Mediterranean flora. Bot Chronica 10:785–796. Brullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (1996a) Allium daninianum (Alliaceae), a new species from the Middle East. Wildenowia 26:237–244. doi: 10.3372/wi.26.2610 Brullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (1996b) A new species of Allium sect. Codonoprasum from Sierra Nevada (Spain). Sendtnera 3:95–100. Brullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (1997a) Allium oporinanthum (Alliaceae), a new species from the NW Mediterranean area. Anales Jard Bot Madrid 55:297–302. doi:10.3989/ajbm.1997.v55.i2.276 Brullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (1997b) Specie a fioritura tardiva del gruppo di Allium paniculatum nell′ area mediterranea. Inform Bot Ital 29:300–302. Brullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (2013) Allium aetnense (Amaryllidaceae), a new species from Sicily. Plant Biosyst 147:835–843. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2013.832433 Brullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (2015) Biosystematic researches on Allium cupani group (Amaryllidaceae) in the Mediterranean area. Fl Medit 25:209–244. doi:10.7320/FlMedit25SI.209 Cang FA, Welles SR, Wong J et al (2024) Genome size variation and evolution during invasive range expansion in an introduced plant. Evol Appl 1:e13624. doi: 10.1111/eva.13624 Carta A, Bedini G, Peruzzi L (2020) A deep dive into the ancestral chromosome number and genome size of flowering plants. New Phytol 228:1097–1106. doi: 10.1111/nph.16668 Castro M, Castro S, Loureiro J (2012) Genome size variation and incidence of polyploidy in Scrophulariaceae sensu lato from the Iberian Peninsula. AoB PLANTS 2012:pls037. doi:10.1093/aobpla/pls037 Čertner M, Fenclová E, Kúr P et al (2017) Evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations in an annual herb: dispersal, local persistence and recurrent origins of polyploids. Ann Bot 120:303–315. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx032 Čertner M, Rydlo J, Dudáš M et al (2022) A unique diploid – triploid contact zone provides insights into the evolutionary mechanisms of cytotype coexistence in flowering rush ( Butomus umbellatus ). Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 54:125659. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2022.125659 Chase MW, Reveal JL, Fay MF (2009) A subfamilial classification for the expanded asparagalean families Amaryllidaceae, Asparagaceae and Xanthorrhoeaceae. Bot J Linn Soc 161:132–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00999.x Cheshmedzhiev IV (1970) A contribution to the cytosystematics of certain species of Allium L. from the flora of Bulgaria. Bot Zhurn 55:1100–1110. Cheshmedzhiev IV (1971) Cytosystematic study of some species from genus Allium L. and Nectaroscordum Lindl. Bot Zhurn 56:1644–1657. Cheshmedzhiev IV (1973) To the cytotaxonomy of some Bulgarian Allium L. species. Bot Zhurn 58:864–875. Cheshmedzhiev IV (1975a) On chromosome polymorphism in some Allium species. Genet Selekts 8:184–191. Cheshmedzhiev IV (1975b) Cytotaxonomic investigation of some onion species from the Codonoprasum Reichenb. section. In: Velchev V et al (eds) In honor Acad. Daki Jordanov. Publishing House Bulg. Acad. Sci., Sofia, pp. 79–89. Cheshmedzhiev IV (1975c) Cytotaxonomic studies of several species of onion from section Codonoprasum Reichenb. C R Acad Bulg Sci 28:795–798. Cheshmedzhiev IV (1976) Reports by I.V. Cheshmedzhiev. In: Löve Á (ed) IOPB Chromosome Number Reports LIV. Taxon 25:442–444. Cheshmedzhiev IV (1977) B-chromosomes in species of the Allium genus. Dokl Bulg Akad Nauk 30:435-437. Cheshmedzhiev IV (1979) Karyosystematic investigations on species of the genus Allium L. in Bulgaria. Fitologija 11:40–46. Cheshmedzhiev IV (1982) Cytotaxonomic study of Allium flavum L. and Allium paczoskianum Tuzson. Nauchni Trudove Selskost Inst Vasil Kolarov 27:11–23. Cheshmedzhiev I (1992) Allium melanantherum complex in Bulgaria. In: Hanelt P, Hammer K, Knüpffer H (eds) The Genus Allium – Taxonomic Problems and Genetic Resources. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Gatersleben: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, pp. 21–26. Cheshmedzhiev IV (1994) Reports (313-366) by I.V. Cheshmedzhiev. In: Kamari G, Felber F, Garbari F (ed) Mediterranean chromosome number reports - 4. Fl Medit 4:233–301. Cheshmedzhiev I (2011) Alliaceae. In: Delipavlov D, Cheshmedzhiev I (eds) Opredelitel na rasteniyata v Bulgariya. Akademichno izdatelstvo na Agrarnija universitet, Plovdiv, pp. 447–452. Chrtek J. Jr., Zahradníček J, Krak J et al (2009) Genome size in Hieracium subgenus Hieracium (Asteraceae) is strongly correlated with major phylogenetic groups. Ann Bot 104:161–178. doi:10.1093/aob/mcp107 Chumová Z, Mandáková T, Trávníček P (2016) Are B-chromosomes responsible for the extraordinary genome size variation in selected Anthoxanthum annuals? Pl Syst Evol 302:731–738. doi:10.1007/s00606-016-1295-5 Ciocârlan V (2000) Flora ilustrată a României. Editura Ceres, Bucureşti. Costa L, Jimenez H, Carvalho R et al (2020) Divide to conquer: Evolutionary history of Allioideae tribes (Amaryllidaceae) is linked to distinct trends of karyotype evolution. Front Plant Sc. 11:320.doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00320 Danin A, Fragman-Sapir O (2016+) Flora of Israel and adjacent areas. https://flora.org.il/en/plants/ Dimopoulos P, Raus T, Strid A (ed) (2023) Flora of Greece web. Vascular plants of Greece. An annotated checklist. Version V (November 2023). https://portal.cybertaxonomy.org/flora-greece/ [accessed June 2024]. Dobignard D, Chatelain C (2010) Index synonymique de la flore d'Afrique du nord 1. Éditions des conservatoire et jardin botaniques, Genève, 455 pp. Dobrochaeva DN, Kotov MI, Prokudin YN (eds) (1999) Key to the higher plants of Ukraine. Fitosociocentr, Kyiv. Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S et al (1998) Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: Inter-laboratory comparison. Ann Bot 82 (Suppl. A):17–26. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010312 Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (2007) Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2:2233–2244. doi: 0.1038/nprot.2007.310 Duchoslav M, Jandová M, Kobrlová L et al (2020) Intricate distribution patterns of six cytotypes of Allium oleraceum at a continental scale: Niche expansion and innovation followed by niche contraction with increasing ploidy level. Front Plant Sci 11:591137. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.591137 Duchoslav M, Šafářová L, Jandová M (2013) Role of adaptive and non-adaptive mechanisms forming complex patterns of genome size variation in six cytotypes of polyploid Allium oleraceum (Amaryllidaceae) on a continental scale. Ann Bot 111:419–431. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs297 Duchoslav M, Šafářová L, Krahulec F (2010) Complex distribution patterns, ecology and coexistence of ploidy levels of Allium oleraceum (Alliaceae) in the Czech Republic. Ann Bot 105:719–735. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq035 Ekrt L, Holubová R, Trávníček P et al (2010) Species boundaries and frequency of hybridization in the D ryopteris carthusiana (Dryopteridaceae) complex: A taxonomic puzzle resolved using genome size data. Am J Bot 97:1208–1219. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900206 Fernandes A, Quieros M (1971) Sur la caryologie de quelque plantes recoltees pendant la Illeme reunion de botanique peninsulaire. Mem Soc Broteriana 21:343–385. Feschotte C, Pritham EJ (2007) DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Annu Rev Genet 41:331–368. Fialová M, Duchoslav M (2014) Response to competition of bulbous geophyte Allium oleraceum differing in ploidy level. Plant Biol 16:186-96. doi: 10.1111/plb.12042 Frajman B, Rešetnik I, Weiss-Schneeweiss H et al (2015) Cytotype diversity and genome size variation in Knautia (Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacoideae). BMC Evol Biol 15:140. doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0425-y Friesen N (1992) Systematics of the Siberian polyploid complex in subgenus Rhizirideum ( Allium ). In: Hanelt P, Hammer K, Knüpffer H (eds) The genus Allium : taxonomic problems and genetic resources. Proceedings of an international symposium held at Gatersleben, Germany, 11-13 Jun 1991. Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung, Gatersleben, pp. 55–66. Friesen N, Fritsch RM, Blattner FR (2006) Phylogeny and new intrageneric classification of Allium (Alliaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences. Aliso 22:372–395. doi:10.5642/aliso.20062201.31 Fritsch RM, Blattner FR, Gurushidze M (2010) New classification of Allium L. subg. Melanocrommyum (Webb & Berthel.) Rouy (Alliaceae) based on molecular and morphological characters. Phyton (Horn) 49:145–220. doi: Fritsch RM, Friesen N (2002) Evolution, domestication and taxonomy. In: Rabinowitch HD, Currah L (eds) Allium crop science: recent advances. CABI publishing, Wallingford, pp. 5–30. Gagnidze R, Gviniashvili T, Danelia I, Tedoradze G. (2015) Reports by Gagnidze et al. In: Marhold K, Breitwieser I (eds) IAPT/IOPB chromosome data 19. Taxon 64:1068-1074. doi:10.12705/645.34 Garcia-Castellanos D, Estrada F, Jiménez-Munt I et al (2009) Catastrophic flood of the Mediterranean after the Messinian salinity crisis. Nature 462:778–781. doi:10.1038/nature08555 Geitler L, Tschermak-Woess E (1962) Chromosomale Variation, strukturelle Hybridität und ihre Folgen bei Allium carinatum . Österr Bot Z 109:150–167. doi:10.1007/BF01289615 Goldblatt P, Lowry PP (2011) The Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers (IPCN): three decades of publication by the Missouri Botanical Garden come to an end. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 98:226–227. doi:10.3417/2011027 Greilhuber J (1998) Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size: A Critical Reassessment. Ann Bot 82:27–35. doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0725 Greilhuber J (2005) Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size in Angiosperms: Identifying its Existence. Ann Bot 95:91–98. doi:10.1093/aob/mci004 Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysák MA et al (2005) The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclearDNA contents. Ann Bot 95:255–260. doi:10.1093/aob/mci019 Griffiths HI, Krystufek B, Reed JM (eds) (2004) Balkan Biodiversity. Pattern and Process in the European Hotspot. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Guerra M (2008) Chromosome numbers in plant cytotaxonomy: concepts and implications. Cytogenet Genome Res 120:339–350. doi:10.1159/000121083 Guerra M (2012) Cytotaxonomy: The end of childhood. Plant Biosyst 146:703–710. doi:10.1080/11263504.2012.717973 Guo K, Pyšek P, van Kleunen M et al (2024) Plant invasion and naturalization are influenced by genome size, ecology and economic use globally. Nat Commun 15:1330. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45667-4 Gurushidze M, Fuchs J, Blattner FR (2012) The evolution of genome size variation in Drumstick Onions ( Allium subgenus Melanocrommyum ). Syst Bot 37:96–104. doi:10.1600/036364412X616675 Hajrudinović A, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Brown SC et al (2015) When sexual meets apomict: genome size, ploidy level and reproductive mode variation of Sorbus aria s.l. and S. austriaca (Rosaceae) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ann Bot 116:301–312. doi:10.1093/aob/mcv093 Han TS, Zheng QJ, Onstein RE et al (2020) Polyploidy promotes species diversification of Allium through ecological shifts. New Phytol 225:571–583. doi:10.1111/nph.16098 Hanelt P (1996) Taxonomic problems in Mediterranean Allium and relationships with non-Mediterranean Allium groups. Bocconea 5:259–265. Hanelt P, Schultze-Motel J, Fritsch R et al (1992) Infrageneric grouping of Allium – the Gatersleben approach. In: Hanelt P, Hammer K, Knüpffer H (eds) The Genus Allium – Taxonomic Problems and Genetic Resources. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Gatersleben: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, pp. 107–123. Hardie DC, Gregory TR, Hebert PDN (2002) From pixels to picograms: A beginners’ guide to genome quantification by Feulgen image analysis densitometry. J Histochem Cytochem 50:735–749. doi:10.1177/002215540205000601 Hauenschild F, Favre A, Schnitzler J et al (2017) Spatio-temporal evolution of Allium L. in the Qinghai–Tibet-Plateau region: Immigration and in situ radiation. Pl Diversity 39:167–179. doi:10.1016/j.pld.2017.05.010 Herben T, Suda J, Klimešová J (2017) Polyploid species rely on vegetative reproduction more than diploids: a re-examination of the old hypothesis. Ann Bot 120:341–349. doi:10.1093/aob/mcx009 Hewitt GM (1999) Postglacial recolonization of European biota. Biol J Linn Soc 68:87–112. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01160.x Holmes DS, Bougourd SM (1989) B-chromosome selection in Allium schoenoprasum . I. Natural populations. Heredity 63:83–87. doi:10.1038/hdy.1989.78 Horák D, Trávníček B, Király G et al (2023) Cytogeography of Gagea bohemica (Liliaceae) outside the Mediterranean: two ploidy levels, spatial differentiation of cytotypes, and occurrence of mixed-ploidy populations. Pl Syst Evol 309:37. doi:10.1007/s00606-023-01877-9 Hörandl E (2009) A combinational theory for maintenance of sex. Heredity 103:445–457. doi:10.1038/hdy.2009.85 Hughes PD, Woodward JC (2017) Quaternary glaciation in the Mediterranean mountains: a new synthesis. In: Hughes PD, Woodward JC (eds) Quaternary Glaciation in the Mediterranean Mountains. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 433, pp. 1–23. Hutang GR, Tong Y, Zhu XG et al (2023) Genome size variation and polyploidy prevalence in the genus Eragrostis are associated with the global dispersal in arid area. Front Plant Sci 14:1066925. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1066925 Jauzein P, Tison JM (2001) Étude analytique du genre Allium L., sous-genre Codonoprasum (Reichenb.) Zahar., section Codonoprasum Reichenb., en France. J Bot Soc Bot France 15:29–50. Jauzein P, Tison JM, Deschâtres R et al (2002) Allium corsicum Jauzein, J.-M. Tison, Deschâtres & H. Couderc spec. nova, espece méconnue de la flore corse. Candollea 5:301–314. Johnson MAT, Brandham PE (1997) New chromosome numbers in petaloid monocotyledons and in other miscellaneous Angiosperms. Kew Bull 52:121–138. Jones RN, Rees H (1968) Nuclear DNA variation in Allium . Heredity 23:591–605. doi:10.1038/hdy.1987.103 Kalpoutzakis E, Trigas P, Constantinidis T (2012) Allium orestis sp. nov. (Amaryllidaceae) from Parnon and Taigetos mountains, south Peloponnisos, Greece. Nord J Bot 30:195–200. doi:10.1111/j.1756-1051.2011.01490.x Karavokyrou E, Tzanoudakis D (1991) The genus Allium in Greece: II. A cytogeographical study of the E Aegean species. Bot Chron 10:777–784. Knight CA, Molinari NA, Petrov DA (2005) The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype. Ann Bot 95:177–190. doi:10.1093/aob/mci011 Kobrlová L, Duchoslav M, Hroneš M (2022) Morphological, ecological and geographic differences between diploids and tetraploids of Symphytum officinale (Boraginaceae) justify both cytotypes as separate species. AoB PLANTS 14:plac028. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plac028 Kobrlová L, Hroneš M, Koutecký P et al (2016) Symphytum tuberosum complex in central Europe: cytogeography, morphology, ecology and taxonomy. Preslia 88:77–112. Koçyiğit M, Özhatay N (2011) Taxonomic remarks on eight Allium species (sect. Codonoprasum ) from south Anatolia. J Fac Pharm Istanbul 41:42–55. Kolář F, Čertner M, Suda J et al (2017) Mixed-ploidy species: progress and opportunities in polyploid research. Trends Plant. Sci. 22:1041–1055. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.011 Kollmann F (1984) Allium . In: Davis PH (ed) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Volume 8. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 98–211. Kollmann F (1985) The genus Allium in Israel. Rotem, 15. Jerusalem. Kollmann F, Shmida A (1977) Allium species of Mt. Hermon. I. Taxonomy. Israel J Bot 26:128−148. Krijgsman W, Hilgen F, Raffi I et al (99) Chronology, causes and progression of the Messinian salinity crisis. Nature 400:652–655. doi:10.1038/23231 Kúr P, Gregor T, Jandová M et al (2023) Cryptic invasion suggested by a cytogeographic analysis of the halophytic Puccinellia distans complex (Poaceae) in Central Europe. Front Plant Sci 14:1249292. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1249292 Labani RM, Elkington TT (1987) Nuclear DNA variation in the genus Allium L. (Liliaceae). Heredity 59:119–128. doi:10.1038/hdy.1987.103 Leitch IJ, Bennett MD (2004) Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol J Linn Soc 82:651–663. doi10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00349.x Leitch IJ, Chase MW, Bennett MD (1998) Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Ann Bot 82:85–94. doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0783 Leitch IJ, Johnston E, Pellicer J et al (2019) Plant DNA C-values Database – Release 7.1. Kew (UK): The Royal Botanic Gardens [updated 2019 April]. https://cvalues.science.kew.org/ . Leitch IJ, Kahandawala I, Suda J et al (2009) Genome diversity in orchids: consequences and evolution. Ann Bot 104:469–481. doi:10.1093/aob/mcp003 Lepší M, Lepší P, Koutecký P et al (2019) Stellaria ruderalis , a new species in the Stellaria media group from central Europe. Preslia 91:391–420. doi:10.23855/preslia.2019.391 Levan A (1931) Cytological studies in Allium . A preliminary note. Hereditas 15:347–356. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1931.tb02557.x Levan A (1933) Cytological studies in Allium . III. Allium carinatum and Allium oleraceum . Hereditas 18:101–114. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1933.tb02602.x Levin DA, Palestis BG, Jones RN et al (2005) Phyletic hot spots for B chromosomes in Angiosperms. Evolution 59:962–969. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01035.x Li QQ, Zhou SD, He XJ et al (2010) Phylogeny and biogeography of Allium (Amaryllidaceae: Allieae) based on nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer and chloroplast rps16 sequences, focusing on the inclusion of species endemic to China. Ann Bot 106:709–733. doi:10.1093/aob/mcq177 Li QQ, Zhou SD, Huang DQ et al (2016) Molecular phylogeny, divergence time estimates and historical biogeography within one of the world’s largest monocot genera. AoB PLANTS 8:plw041. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plw041 Lillie RD (1951) Simplification of the manufacture of Schiff reagent for use in histochemical procedures. Stain Technol 26:163–165. Lisch D (2013) How important are transposons for plant evolution? Nat Rev Genet 14:49–61.doi:10.1038/nrg3374 Liveri E, Katopodi E, Kamari G (2019) Karyosystematic study of some taxa from the Ionian floristic region (Greece). II. Fl Medit 29:308–320. doi:10.7320/FlMedit29.308 Loureiro J, Čertner M, Lučanová M et al (2023) The use of flow cytometry for estimating genome sizes and DNA ploidy levels in plants. In: Heitkam T, Garcia S (eds) Plant Cytogenetics and Cytogenomics. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 2672. Humana, New York, pp. 25–64. Loureiro J, Trávníček P, Rauchová J et al (2010) The use of flow cytometry in the biosystematics, ecology and population biology of homoploid plants. Preslia 82:3–21. Magulaev AY (1992) Chromosome numbers in some species of vascular plants of the northern Caucasus flora. Bot Zhurn 77:88–90. Mandáková T, Lysák MA (2018) Post-polyploid diploidization and diversification through dysploid changes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 42:55–65. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2018.03.001 Marcucci R, Tornadore N (1994) Cariologia di alcuni popolamenti di Allium tenuiflorum Ten. provenienti dal Cilento (Italia meridionale). Giorn Bot Ital 12:252. Gagnidze R, Gviniashvili T, MukbaJinjolianiani M et al (2015) Reports by Gagnidze, R., Gviniashvili, T., Mukbaniani, M. & Jinjolia, L. In: Marhold K (ed) IAPT/IOPB chromosome data 19. Taxon 64:1068–1074. doi:10.12705/645.34 Mayrose I, Lysák MA (2020) The evolution of chromosome numbers: mechanistic models and experimental approaches. Genome Biol Evol 13:evaa220. doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa220 Mathew B (1996) A review of Allium section Allium . Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Mikolaskova K (2009) Continental and oceanic precipitation régime in Europe. Cent Eur J Geosci 1:176–182. doi:10.2478/v10085-009-0013-8 Mráz P, Šingliarová B, Urfus T et al (2008) Cytogeography of Pilosella officinarum (Compositae): Altitudinal and Longitudinal Differences in Ploidy Level Distribution in the Czech Republic and Slovakia and the General Pattern in Europe. Ann Bot 101:59–71. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm282 Nagl W, Fusenig HP (1979) Types of chromatin organization in plant nuclei. In: Nagl W, Hemleben V, Ehrendorfer F (eds) Genome and Chromatin: Organization, Evolution, Function. Plant Systematics and Evolution. Vol. 2. Springer, Vienna, pp. 221–233. Nieto Feliner G (2014) Patterns and processes in plant phylogeography in the Mediterranean Basin. A review. Perspect Pl Ecol Evol Syst 16:265–278. doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2014.07.002 Nikolov Z (2021) Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Allium (Alliaceae) in the flora of the Republic of North Macedonia. Acta Mus Maced Sci Nat 24:55–64. Noroozi J, Zare G, Sherafati M et al (2019) Patterns of Endemism in Turkey, the Meeting Point of Three Global Biodiversity Hotspots, Based on Three Diverse Families of Vascular Plants. Front Ecol Evol 7:159. doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00159 Oganesian ME, Agababian MV (2001) Sem. 3 Alliaceae, Lukovye. In: Takhtajan AL (ed) Flora Armenii. Tom 10 Monocotyledones. Gantner, Ruggell, pp. 280–348. Ohri O (1998) Genome Size Variation and Plant Systematics. Ann Bot 82:75–83. doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0765 Ohri D, Fritsch RM, Hanelt P (1998) Evolution of genome size in Allium (Alliaceae). Pl Syst Evol 210:57–86. doi:10.1007/BF00984728 Ohri D, Pistrick K (2001) Phenology and genome size variation in Allium L. - a tight correlation? Plant Biol 3:654–660. doi:10.1055/s-2001-19362 Özhatay N (1990) The genus Allium in European Turkey and around Istanbul. Ann Mus Goulandris 8:115–128. Özhatay N (1993) Allium in Turkey: distribution, diversity, endemism and chromosome number. In: Demiriz H, Özhatay N (ed) 5th OPTIMA Meeting; 1986 Sep 8-15, Istanbul University Press, Istanbul, pp. 247–271. Özhatay N, Koçyiğit M (2019) A checklist of Turkish species, with taxonomic assessments: Allium sect. Allium , sect. Codonoprasum and sect. Scorodon . Bot Chron 22:73–85. Özhatay N, Koçyiğit M, Brullo S et al (2018) Allium istanbulense , a new autumnal species of A . sect. Codonoprasum (Amaryllidaceae) from Turkey and its taxonomic position among allied species. Phytotaxa 334:152-166. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.334.2.5 Ozkan H, Tuna M, Arumuganathan K (2003) Nonadditive changes in genome size during allopolyploidization in the wheat ( Aegilops - Triticum ) group. J Hered 94:260–264. doi:10.1093/jhered/esg053 Papanicolaou K (1984) Reports by Papanicolaou K. In: Löve Á (ed) Chromosome Number Reports LXXXII. Taxon 33:126–134. doi:10.1002/j.1996-8175.1984.tb02474.x Pastor J (1982) Karyology of Allium species from the Iberian Peninsula. Phyton (Horn) 22:171–200. Pellicer J, Leitch IJ (2020) The Plant DNA C-values database (release 7.1): an updated online repository of plant genome size data for comparative studies. New Phytol 226:301–305. doi:10.1111/nph.16261 Peruzzi L (2003) Numeri cromosomici per la Flora Italiana 1415-1420. Inform Bot Ital 35:81-84. Peruzzi L (2007) Allium garbarii (Alliaceae), a new species endemic to Calabria (S Italy). Candollea 62:17–25. Peruzzi L, Carta A, Altinordu F (2017) Chromosome diversity and evolution in Allium (Allioideae, Amaryllidaceae). Plant Biosyst 151:212–220. doi:10.1080/11263504.2016.1149123 Peruzzi L, Domina G, Bartolucci F et al (2015) An inventory of the names of vascular plants endemic to Italy, their loci classici and types. Phytotaxa 196:30. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.410.1.1 Poggio L, Realini MF, Fourastié MF et al (2014) Genome downsizing and karyotype constancy in diploid and polyploid congeners: a model of genome size variation. AoB PLANTS 6:plu029. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plu029 Pogosian AI (1983) Chromosome numbers of some species of the genus Allium (Alliaceae) distributed in Armenia and Iran. Bot Zhurn 68:652–660. Pogosian AI (1990) Reports by A.I. Pogosian. In: Agapova ND, Zakharova KB, Vakhtina LI et al Numeri chromosomatum Magnoliophytorum florae URSS. Aceraceae–Menyantaceae. Nauka, Lenigrad, p. 32. Popelka O, Sochor M, Duchoslav M (2019) Reciprocal hybridization between diploid Ficaria calthifolia and tetraploid Ficaria verna subsp. verna : evidence from experimental crossing, genome size and molecular markers. Bot J Linn Soc 189:293–310. doi:10.1093/botlinnean/boy085 POWO (2024) Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the Internet. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/. Accessed 10 June 2024. Prančl J, Kaplan Z, Trávníček P et al (2014) Genome size as a key to evolutionary complex aquatic plants: polyploidy and hybridization in Callitriche (Plantaginaceae). PLoS ONE 9:e105997. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105997 Prančl J, Koutecký P, Trávníček P et al (2018) Cytotype variation, cryptic diversity and hybridization in Ranunculus sect. Batrachium revealed by flow cytometry and chromosome numbers. Preslia 90:195–223. doi:10.23855/preslia.2018.195 Puizina J, Jelisavac M, Šolić ME et al (1997) B-chromosomes in the population of Allium pallens ssp. tenuiflorum from the region of Makarska. Period Biol 99:129–134. Pungaršek Š, Frajman B (2024) Influence of polyploidy on morphology and distribution of the Cypress Spurge ( Euphorbia cyparissias , Euphorbiaceae). Plant Biol https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13685 Rabinowitch HD, Currah L (eds) (2002) Allium crop science: recent advances. CAB Int., Wallington, UK. Ramsey J, Schemske DW (1998) Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:467–501. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467 Ramsey J, Schemske DW (2002) Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 33:589–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150437 Redouté PJ (1811) Les Liliacées. Volume VI. Paris. Rejlová L, Chrtek J, Trávníček P et al (2019) Polyploid evolution: The ultimate way to grasp the nettle. PLoS ONE 14:e0218389. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218389 Rešetnik I, Frajman B, Bogdanović S et al (2014) Disentangling relationships among the diploid members of the intricate genus Knautia (Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacoideae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 74:97–110. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.01.028 Rey C, Rey S, Kaplan K et al (2015) Allium oporinanthum Brullo, Pavone & Salmeri, new species for the Aoste Valley and for Italy. Rev Valdôtaine Hist Nat 69:21–40. Ricci I (1965) Ricerche citotassonomiche su alcune specie di Allium. Ann Bo. (Roma) 28:351–363. Rice A, Glick L, Abadi S et al (2015) The Chromosome Counts Database (CCDB) – a community resource of plant chromosome numbers. New Phytol 206:19–26. doi:10.1111/nph.13191 Rice A, Šmarda P, Novosolov M et al (2019) The global biogeography of polyploid plants. Nat Ecol Evol 3:265–273. doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0787-9 Roddy AB, Théroux-Rancourt G, Abbo T et al. (2020) The scaling of genome size and cell size limits maximum rates of photosynthesis with implications for ecological strategies. Int J Plant Sci 181:75–87. doi:10.1086/706186 Ruíz Rejón M, Sañudo A (1976) Estudios cariologicos en especies españolas del orden Liliales. I. Allium , Lapiedra , Narcissus . Lagascalia 6:225–238. Ruíz Rejón M, Oliver JL, Ruíz Rejón C et al (1980) Numeros cromosomicos para la flora española. 121-182. Lagascalia 9:249–284. Ruíz Rejón C, Lozano R, Ruíz Rejón M (1986) Números cromosómicos para la flora española, numeros 479-484. Lagascalia 14:292–297. Šafářová L, Duchoslav M (2010) Cytotype distribution in mixed populations of polyploid Allium oleraceum measured at a microgeographic scale. Preslia 82:107–126. Šafářová L, Duchoslav M, Jandová M et al (2011) Allium oleraceum in Slovakia: cytotype distribution and ecology. Preslia 83:513–527. Salmeri C, Brullo C, Brullo S et al (2016) What is Allium paniculatum ? Establishing taxonomic and molecular phylogenetic relationships within A. sect. Codonoprasum . J Syst Evol 54:123–135. doi:10.1111/jse.12170 Salmeri C, Brullo S, Messina V (2014) Analisi molecolare e filogenesi delle specie a fioritura tardiva del genere Allium (Amaryllidaceae, Allioideae). Flora vascolare d'Italia: studi biosistematici, taxa endemici e loci classici, SOCIETÀ BOTANICA ITALIANA, Orto botanico, La Sapienza Università di Roma, 19-20 ottobre 2012, pp. 43–45. Schmitt T (2007) Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and postglacial trends. Front Zool 4:11. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-4-11 Schubert I, Lysák MA (2011) Interpretation of karyotype evolution should consider chromosome structural constraints. Trends Genet. 27: 207–216. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.03.004 Seregin AP (2007) The genus Allium L. (Alliaceae) in the flora of Eastern Europe. PhD dissertation, Lomonosov State University, Moscow. Shmida A, Kollmann F (1977) Allium species of Mt. Hermon. II. Distribution, variation and polyploidy correlated with vertical zonation. Isr J Bot 26:149–159. Siljak-Yakovlev S, Muratović E. Bogunić F et al. (2020) Genome size of Balkan flora: a database (GeSDaBaF) and C-values for 51 taxa of which 46 are novel. Plant Syst Evol 306:40. doi:10.1007/s00606-020-01670-y Šímová I, Herben T (2012) Geometrical constraints in the scaling relationships between genome size, cell size and cell cycle length in herbaceous plants. Proc R Soc B Bio. Sci 279:867–875. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1284 Sinitsina TA (2019) Genus Allium L. (Alliaceae) in Siberia. Vavilovia 2:3–22. doi:10.30901/2658-3860-2019-3-3-22 Sliwinska E, Loureiro J Leitch IJ et al (2022) Application-based guidelines for best practices in plant flow cytometry. Cytometry A 101:749–781. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.24499 Šmarda P, Bureš P (2010) Understanding intraspecific variation in genome size in plants. Preslia 82:41–61. Šmarda P, Knápek O, Březinová A et al (2019) Genome sizes and genomic guanine+cytosine (GC) contents of the Czech vascular flora with new estimates for 1700 species. Preslia 91:117–142. doi:10.23855/preslia.2019.117 Sochor M, Trávníček B, Király G (2019) Ploidy level variation in the genus Rubus in the Pannonian Basin and the northern Balkans, and evolutionary implications. Pl Syst Evol 305:611–626. doi:10.1007/s00606-019-01593-3 Španiel S, Rešetnik I (2022) Plant phylogeography of the Balkan Peninsula: spatio-temporal patterns and processes. Pl Syst Evol 308:38. doi:10.1007/s00606-022-01831-1 Speta F (1984) Über Oberösterreich wildwachsende Laucharten ( Allium L, Alliaceae). Linz Biol Beitr 16:45–81. Stearn WT (1980) Allium L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA et al (eds) Flora Europaea, Volume 5: Alismataceae to Orchidaceae (Monocotyledones). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 49–69. Stebbins GL (1971) Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold, London. Strid A, Franzén R (1981) Reports by A. Strid and R. Franzén. In: Löve Á (ed) Chromosome Number Reports LXXIII. Taxon 30:829–861. doi:10.1002/j.1996-8175.1981.tb04309.x Stuessy TF (2009) Plant Taxonomy. The Systematic Evolution of Comparative Data, 2nd Edition. Columbia University Press, New York. Suda J, Krahulcová A, Trávníček P et al (2006) Ploidy level vs. DNA ploidy level: an appeal for consistent terminology. Taxon 55: 447–450. doi:10.2307/25065591 Tanker N, Kurucu S (1979) Cytotaxonomical researches on some species of Allium naturally growing in Turkey. Ankara Univo Eczac Fak Mecm 9:1–82. Taraška V, Batoušek P, Duchoslav M et al (2021) Morphological variability, cytotype diversity, and cytogeography of populations traditionally called Dactylorhiza fuchsii in Central Europe. Pl Syst Evol 307:51. doi:10.1007/s00606-021-01770-3 Taraška V, Duchoslav M, Hroneš M et al (2024) Dactylorhiza maculata agg. (Orchidaceae) in Central Europe: Intricate Patterns in Morphological Variability, Cytotype Diversity and Ecology Support the Single-Species Concept. Folia Geobot 58:151–188. doi:10.1007/s12224-024-09441-0 Teofilovski A (2021) New floristic data in North Macedonia with a first record of Allium melanantherum Pančić. Biol Nyssana 12:1–10. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5522951 Terlević A, Bogdanović S, Frajman B et al (2022) Genome size variation in Dianthus sylvestris Wulfen sensu lato (Caryophyllaceae). Plants 11:1481. doi:10.3390/plants11111481 Tison JM, de Foucault B (eds) (2014) Flora Gallica: Flore de France. Biotope Éditions. Tornadore N (1981) Numeri cromosomici per la flora italiana: 806-813. Inform Bot Ital 13:151–157. Tornadore N, Marcucci R (2005) Analisi cariologica e micromorfologica di alcuni taxa del Distretto Euganeo (Padova, NE Italia). Inform Bot Ital 37:56–57. Trájer AJ, Sebestyén V, Padisák J (2021) The impacts of the Messinian salinity crisis on the biogeography of three Mediterranean sandfly (Diptera: Psychodidae) species. Geobios 65:51–66. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2021.02.003 Trávníček P, Jersáková J, Kubátková B et al (2012) Minority cytotypes in European populations of the Gymnadenia conopsea complex (Orchidaceae) greatly increase intraspecific and intrapopulation diversity. Ann Bot 110:977–986. doi:10.1093/aob/mcs171 Trigas P, Iatrou G, Tzanoudakis D (2010) Allium apergii sp. nov. (Alliaceae, A . sect. Codonoprasum ) from Evvia Island, Greece. J Biol Res-Thessalon 14:225–229. Trigas P, Kalpoutzakis E, Constantinidis T (2017) Two new Allium ( A. sect. Cupanioscordum , Amaryllidaceae) species from Greece. Phytotaxa 297:179–188. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.297.2.5 Tschermak-Woess E (1947) Über chromosomale Plastizität bei Wildformen von Allium carinatum und anderen Allium -Arten aus den Ostalpen. Chromosoma 3:66–87. Tzanoudakis D, Trigas P (2015) Allium occultum , a new species of A . sect. Codonoprasum (Amaryllidaceae) from Skiros Island (W Aegean, Greece). Phytotaxa 202:135–142. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.202.2.5 Tzanoudakis D, Tsakiri M, Raus Th (2019) What is Allium achaium Boiss. & Orph.? Disentangling the taxonomy of a Greek mountain species. Willdenowia 49:231–239. do:i10.3372/wi.49.49211 Tzanoudakis D, Vosa CG (1988) The cytogeographical distribution pattern of Allium (Alliaceae) in the Greek Peninsula and Islands. Pl Syst Evol 159:193–215. Vakhtina LI (1964) Chromosome numbers of some species of the genus Allium , occurring in the territory of the USSR. Bot Zhurn 49:870–875. Vakhtina LI, Kudryjashova GL (1985) Karyosystematic study in some species of the section Codonoprasum of the genus Allium (Alliaceae). Bot Zhurn 70:76–88. Vakhtina LI, Zakirova RO, Vakhtin YB (1977) Interspecific differences in DNA contents and taxonomically valid characters in Allium L. (Liliaceae). Bot Zhurn 62:677–682. Van de Peer Y, Mizrachi E, Marchal K (2017) The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat Rev Genet 18:411–424. doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.26 Ved Brat S (1965) Genetic systems in Allium , I. Chromosome variation. Chromosoma 16:486–499. Veselý P, Bureš P, Šmarda P et al (2012) Genome size and DNA base composition of geophytes: the mirror of phenology and ecology? Ann Bot 109:65–75. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr267 Vejvodová K, Krejčí J, Koutecký P et al (2024) High mountains of central Europe as a refuge of surprising cytotype diversity of Huperzia selago (Lycopodiaceae). Alp Bot 134:87–100. doi:10.1007/s00035-024-00312-0 Vojtěchová K, Kobrlová L, Schönswetter P et al (2023) Disentangling the taxonomic structure of the Allium paniculatum species complex in central and eastern Europe using molecular, cytogenetic and morphological tools. Preslia 95:119–163. doi:10.23855/preslia.2023.119 Vojtěchová K, Kobrlová L, Kitner M et al (2024) Allium goumenissanum (Amaryllidaceae), a new species for Bulgaria and new localities in Greece, with additions to the genetic, cytogenetic and morphological characteristics of the species. Mediterr Bot 45:e89106. doi:10.5209/mbot.89106 Vosa CG (1976) Heterochromatic banding pattern in Allium . II. Heterochromatin variation in species of the paniculatum group. Chromosoma 57:119–133. Vujošević M, Jovanović V, Blagojević J (2013) Polyploidy and b chromosomes in Allium flavum from Serbia. Arch Biol Sci 65:23–32. doi:10.2298/ABS1301023V Vvedensky A (1935) Allium L. In: Komarov VL (ed) Flora SSSR, Vol. 4. Liliiflorae, Microspermae. Izdateľstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva & Leningrad, pp. 112–280. Wang X, Morton JA, Pellicer J et al (2021) Genome downsizing after polyploidy: mechanisms, rates and selection pressures. Plant J 107:1003–1015. doi:10.1111/tpj.15363 Wang G, Zhou N, Chen Q et al (2023) Gradual genome size evolution and polyploidy in Allium from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Ann Bot 131:109–122. doi:10.1093/aob/mcab155 Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Greilhuber J, Schneeweiss GM (2006) Genome size evolution in holoparasitic Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) and related genera. Am J Bot 93:148–156. doi:10.3732/ajb.93.1.148 Wetching VW (1992) Chromosomenzahlen Kärntner Gefäßpflanzen (Teil 3): Karyologie und Verbreitung der Allium -Arten (Alliaceae) in Kärnten. Carinthia II 182:497–533. Wilde-Duyfjes de BEE (1976) A revision of the genus Allium L. (Liliaceae) in Africa. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen 76:1–237. Wu LL, Cui XK, Milne RI et al (2010) Multiple autopolyploidizations and range expansion of Allium przewalskianum Regel. (Alliaceae) in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Mol Ecol 19:1691–704. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04613.x Zakirova RO, Nafanailova II (1988) Chromosome numbers in members of some families of the Kazakhstan flora. Bot Zhurn 73:452–453. Zahariadi C (1966) Allium L. In: Săvulescu T (ed.) Flora republicae socialisticae Romanicae 11. Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România, Bucharest, pp. 187–267. Zahariadi C (1975) Le sous-genre Codonoprasum (Genre Alium L., fam. Alliaceae Agardh 1858) en Grece et en Roumainie. IIe partie. Biologia Gallo-Helenica 6:27–64. Zonneveld BJM (2001) Nuclear DNA contents of all species of Helleborus (Ranunculaceae) discriminate between species and sectional divisions. Pl Syst Evol 229:125–130. doi:10.1007/s006060170022 Additional Declarations Table 1 is available in the supplementary files section. Supplementary Files Table1.docx SupplementaryMaterial.docx SupplementaryFiguresS1S2.docx TableS1.xlsx TableS2.xlsx TableS3.xlsx TableS4.xlsx TableS5.xlsx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 24 Dec, 2024 Read the published version in Botanical Studies → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Minor revision 17 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 02 Sep, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 02 Sep, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 28 Aug, 2024 First submitted to journal 25 Aug, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4972960","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":348218675,"identity":"90938c59-b2a8-47b1-8fe1-d09bb9a824e0","order_by":0,"name":"Lucie Kobrlová","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Palacky University Olomouc Faculty of Science: Univerzita Palackeho v Olomouci Prirodovedecka fakulta","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lucie","middleName":"","lastName":"Kobrlová","suffix":""},{"id":348218676,"identity":"b42728c2-ca57-4638-9e51-5070018a20a4","order_by":1,"name":"Michaela Jandová","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences: Botanicky Ustav Akademie Ved Ceske Republiky","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Michaela","middleName":"","lastName":"Jandová","suffix":""},{"id":348218677,"identity":"62cc8907-e434-4399-aca7-82bf53cbfbd0","order_by":2,"name":"Kateřina Vojtěchová","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Palacky University Olomouc Faculty of Science: Univerzita Palackeho v Olomouci Prirodovedecka fakulta","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kateřina","middleName":"","lastName":"Vojtěchová","suffix":""},{"id":348218678,"identity":"88a6fde1-773b-4a8f-be67-cc2e0c9284c1","order_by":3,"name":"Lenka Šafářová","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Palacky University Olomouc Faculty of Science: Univerzita Palackeho v Olomouci Prirodovedecka fakulta","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lenka","middleName":"","lastName":"Šafářová","suffix":""},{"id":348218679,"identity":"a46350e7-8f51-47da-9806-a2d7af90c233","order_by":4,"name":"Martin Duchoslav","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8553-8226","institution":"Palacky University Olomouc Faculty of Science: Univerzita Palackeho v Olomouci Prirodovedecka fakulta","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Martin","middleName":"","lastName":"Duchoslav","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-08-25 13:41:36","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4972960/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4972960/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-024-00446-8","type":"published","date":"2024-12-24T15:57:50+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":64197148,"identity":"4ea1d75c-0ff1-4ba5-9329-2c6e506dd779","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 21:59:33","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":2335605,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eDistribution of ploidy levels of some taxa of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e, based on new and published records. \u003cstrong\u003eA\u003c/strong\u003e. \u003cem\u003eA. carinatum\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003ecarinatum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eB.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. carinatum \u003c/em\u003esubsp. \u003cem\u003epulchellum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum \u003c/em\u003e[DEN] and \u003cem\u003eA. longispathum sensu \u003c/em\u003eJauzein and Tison (2001) [LON], \u003cstrong\u003eD.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. pallens \u003c/em\u003e[PAL] and group of populations assigned to the informal group “\u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum-pallens\u003c/em\u003e” [DEN-PAL], \u003cstrong\u003eE.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. flavum \u003c/em\u003esubsp. \u003cem\u003eflavum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eF.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. flavum \u003c/em\u003esubsp. \u003cem\u003etauricum\u003c/em\u003e. Circles represent new records based on either chromosome number counts or FCM, diamonds represent previously published records [publ. CHN]. Mixed-ploidy populations are indicated by ‘+’ between co-occurring ploidies. The approximate range of each taxon (except \u003cem\u003eA. longispathum\u003c/em\u003e and “\u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum-pallens\u003c/em\u003e”), based on various sources, is shown in light yellow within the respective map.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/0cdaba19634526dba4e2ddab.png"},{"id":64197152,"identity":"6d67a17f-bec6-464d-90cb-4e9f305465b2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 21:59:33","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":175739,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eRelationships between relative genome size (RGS) and geography (longitude, latitude) for measured accessions of \u003cstrong\u003eA.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. carinatum\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003ecarinatum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eB.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. carinatum\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003epulchellum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eC.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eD.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. pallens, \u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eE.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003eflavum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cstrong\u003eF.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003etauricum\u003c/em\u003e. Each ploidy level is shown separately within the plots. Each point represents the mean RGS of the respective population (see Table S2).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/95712933e6d8340f6cb04544.png"},{"id":64197150,"identity":"ecc2f0c3-3c5f-4ef4-80c5-28fa711661ec","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 21:59:33","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":945332,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePloidy level composition of taxa of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum. \u003c/em\u003eFrequency (both absolute and relative) of ploidy categories (di-, di-\u0026amp;polyploid, polyploid) with \u003cstrong\u003eA.\u003c/strong\u003e all revised taxa with at least one chromosome count and \u003cstrong\u003eB.\u003c/strong\u003e with 13 taxa excluded based on Özhatay and Koçyiğit (2019). \u003cstrong\u003eC.\u003c/strong\u003ePloidy level composition of the respective di-\u0026amp;polyploid and polyploid taxa, both with (all, n = 37 taxa) and without accounting for some taxa excluded (ex, n = 36 taxa) based on Özhatay and Koçyiğit (2019). \u003cstrong\u003eD.\u003c/strong\u003e Ploidy composition (di-, di-\u0026amp;polyploid, polyploid; see colours in A of all taxa with known ploidy in respective regions (from east to west: Caucasus without RUS; Near East without TUR; TUR; CYP; UKR+RUS+BLR; BGR+ROU; GRC incl. Aegean islands; Former YUG; ITA; Central Europe; North and northwestern Europe; North Africa; FRA; ESP+PRT). For details see Tables S1, S2, S4.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/d0b5a611afda7c7d2692284c.png"},{"id":64197065,"identity":"20a1477b-0f3a-4fcd-984f-a85f456c5503","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 21:51:33","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":197369,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eGenome size of taxa in the \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e. All available data on GS (population means) meeting the strict criteria (see M\u0026amp;M) were used for the analyses. \u003cstrong\u003eA.\u003c/strong\u003e Absolute genome size (AGS, 2C values, pg). In the inset, variation in AGS (2C values) within the whole genus \u003cem\u003eAllium \u003c/em\u003e(data from Leitch et al. 2019) and \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum \u003c/em\u003e(Tables S1, S3) are compared. \u003cstrong\u003eB.\u003c/strong\u003e Monoploid genome size (1Cx values, pg). Taxa are ordered along the x-axis from left to the right according to an increasing median of 2C values of the lowermost ploidy. Where multiple population measurements are available for a given taxon, a boxplot of GS is presented, separately for each ploidy level. The median AGS is represented by a coloured circle. In the case of only one measurement per taxon/ploidy, only the coloured circle representing the measured value is shown.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/cf26481f59b0bd5f41db69c6.png"},{"id":72640645,"identity":"09addba2-a2c0-4624-b930-a1a6be5d55ce","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-12-30 16:07:57","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":5150325,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/8f4311a6-7651-4f6c-a5dd-4333d08f14e4.pdf"},{"id":64197071,"identity":"bf67b784-efb1-4200-a042-604d3ca141e2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 21:51:33","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":183839,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Table1.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/62cddc27f38d2fe20fd61e8a.docx"},{"id":64197309,"identity":"bd2cd098-cd63-46aa-83aa-c5b0cf5ffe11","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 22:07:33","extension":"docx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":16642,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryMaterial.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/40280506f49f0ed56ef8d425.docx"},{"id":64197074,"identity":"e537f2f2-0c74-4e19-8614-3aa3600955a1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 21:51:33","extension":"docx","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":6719057,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryFiguresS1S2.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/551f6d4edcf54e1f162a1e92.docx"},{"id":64197151,"identity":"51530187-47be-4f6b-8b40-dd127c7a3c91","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 21:59:33","extension":"xlsx","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":173550,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TableS1.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/62070d839c52c9a9abe02fa6.xlsx"},{"id":64197076,"identity":"ff173828-ed65-46fa-ae45-1816827f5ba1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 21:51:33","extension":"xlsx","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":221647,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TableS2.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/7ea2275fad752296dea57d01.xlsx"},{"id":64197072,"identity":"d3e1b035-8209-4e5a-9be4-bdd1bd949bd5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 21:51:33","extension":"xlsx","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":87132,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TableS3.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/e8d847f5a015d24d45303e15.xlsx"},{"id":64197079,"identity":"678b584d-d267-430d-aa5e-692cada86379","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 21:51:34","extension":"xlsx","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":407879,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TableS4.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/51d0e8aa5055d3e8aadca3c9.xlsx"},{"id":64197077,"identity":"2dcce0db-ff80-4242-b196-9a2c73325a82","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-09 21:51:33","extension":"xlsx","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":173556,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"TableS5.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4972960/v1/1d115678ce209851ec70c181.xlsx"}],"financialInterests":"\u003cp\u003eTable 1 is available in the supplementary files section.\u003c/p\u003e","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eNew estimates and synthesis of chromosome number, ploidy level and genome size variation in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e: a step towards understanding the hitherto unresolved diversification and evolution of the section\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eAs the evolutionary history of organisms is inscribed in their chromosomes, chromosome number is a fundamental genomic attribute of an organism (Mayrose and Lys\u0026aacute;k \u003cspan citationid=\"CR137\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Information on chromosome number (Rice et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR178\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) and nuclear DNA content (Greilhuber et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR82\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e; Pellicer and Leitch \u003cspan citationid=\"CR156\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Siljak-Yakovlev et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR192\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) highlights the role of numerical variation (Van de Peer et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR225\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) and, together with the study of karyotypic differentiation, helps to understand the role of structural changes in evolutionary processes (e.g. Schubert and Lys\u0026aacute;k \u003cspan citationid=\"CR189\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Mand\u0026aacute;kov\u0026aacute; and Lys\u0026aacute;k \u003cspan citationid=\"CR134\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). Chromosome number and genome size (hereafter GS) are important species-specific traits (Stebbins \u003cspan citationid=\"CR202\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1971\u003c/span\u003e; Guerra \u003cspan citationid=\"CR84\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR85\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Goldblatt and Lowry \u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Carta et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Pellicer and Leitch \u003cspan citationid=\"CR156\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), which are useful tools for discriminating between taxa and resolving taxonomy within groups that are critical, for example, due to morphological reduction, phenotypic plasticity, mating systems and reticulate evolution (e.g. Castro et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Hajrudinović et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR88\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Prančl et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR167\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Popelka et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR164\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Afonso et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). GS and its intraspecific variation may also help to understand the evolutionary forces shaping genomic features (Šmarda and Bureš \u003cspan citationid=\"CR196\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Prančl et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR166\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR167\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Becher et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) and functional diversity of plants (e.g. Š\u0026iacute;mov\u0026aacute; and Herben \u003cspan citationid=\"CR193\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Roddy et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR180\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Bitomsk\u0026yacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReports on the chromosomes of species are usually based on small numbers of individuals. Such an approach may underestimate the variability in cytotype composition within and between populations, which is usually the result of genome duplication (Stuessy \u003cspan citationid=\"CR204\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). From a practical perspective, flow cytometry has proven valuable in plant biosystematics over the last two decades (Bourge et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Sliwinska et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR195\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Loureiro et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR131\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). This technique allows rapid and non-destructive estimation of DNA-ploidy levels and nuclear DNA content in a large number of samples (e.g. Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR215\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Čertner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Rejlov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR174\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Its application has led to the discovery of diverse cytotypes in various plant taxa, providing a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying cytotype origin and coexistence (reviewed in Kol\u0026aacute;ř et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR111\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e), cytogeographic diversity across species ranges (e.g. Mr\u0026aacute;z et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR140\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Šaf\u0026aacute;řov\u0026aacute; and Duchoslav \u003cspan citationid=\"CR184\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Šaf\u0026aacute;řov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR185\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Kobrlov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR109\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR108\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Taraška et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR207\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR208\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Hor\u0026aacute;k et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR97\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Vejvodov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR228\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) or the identification of patterns of ecological diversification or habitat shifts (e.g. Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Kobrlov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR108\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003er et al. 2023), which can provide insight into the evolutionary history of species (Blommaert \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Cang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e L. (Amaryllidaceae, Allieae) is one of the largest monocotyledonous genera (Chase et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Costa et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), with over a thousand accepted species (POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e), represented by perennial rhizomatous or bulbiferous herbs that combine sexual and asexual reproduction (Rabinowitch and Currah \u003cspan citationid=\"CR170\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e), and is widely distributed throughout the Northern Hemisphere (Fritsch and Friesen \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e; Friesen et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e; Li et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR126\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Hauenschild et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR93\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). The genus exhibits multiple basic chromosome numbers, including \u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7, 8, 9, 10, 11 (Hanelt et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR91\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e; Friesen et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e; Li et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR127\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Peruzzi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR159\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Han et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). The genus also displays high levels of polyploidy (Friesen \u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e; Hanelt et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR91\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e; Han et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) and occasional B chromosome appearance (Speta \u003cspan citationid=\"CR200\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1984\u003c/span\u003e; Holmes and Bougourd \u003cspan citationid=\"CR96\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e; Vujošević et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR232\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). Polyploidisation is considered the main driver of adaptations and speciation across diverse environments within the genus (Han et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA number of studies have been conducted on the diversity of chromosome number (for a comprehensive survey see Peruzzi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR159\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Han et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) and GS (Leitch et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR120\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) in the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e. However, despite the genus's taxonomic richness, certain groups within the genus are underrepresented in databases of chromosome count and GS. This is particularly evident in the \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e Rchnb. This section is one of the largest and taxonomically most complicated within the genus (Hanelt \u003cspan citationid=\"CR90\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e; Salmeri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR187\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR186\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; \u0026Ouml;zhatay and Ko\u0026ccedil;yiğit \u003cspan citationid=\"CR151\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), exhibiting minor morphological differences between taxa and presence of polyploid species/species groups (Tzanoudakis and Vosa \u003cspan citationid=\"CR221\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e; Peruzzi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR159\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Han et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). This often leads to misidentification of taxa (Salmeri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR186\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR229\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), and thus a significant proportion of older karyological reports for certain species may not be reliable due to uncertain identification of the studied individuals. In addition, GS data are lacking for the majority of species within the section, with only a small subset of taxa having been studied (Ohri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR147\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e; Baranyi and Greilhuber \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e; Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Šmarda et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR197\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR229\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR230\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Furthermore, more detailed analyses focusing on population-level differences in GS (i.e. global and local distribution patterns of cytotypes) are almost absent for section members (Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Šaf\u0026aacute;řov\u0026aacute; and Duchoslav \u003cspan citationid=\"CR184\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Šaf\u0026aacute;řov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR185\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo address these issues in a broader context, we collected population samples of 25 taxa (species, subspecies) of \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e across Europe and neighbouring regions. Using classical karyology, flow cytometry and a comprehensive review of the available literature, our aims were to (i) determine the diversity of DNA ploidy levels (\u003cem\u003esensu\u003c/em\u003e Suda et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR205\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e) within and between populations for each taxon studied, (ii) validate the detected DNA ploidy levels by chromosome counting, (iii) estimate the GS of the detected ploidy levels and evaluate its variation and spatial pattern, and (iv) critically compare the new data with those from the literature. Finally, we aimed to discuss the patterns obtained in more general content. Therefore, we extracted all available data on chromosome number and GS for the remaining section members not covered by our present research and synthesised the current knowledge on cytogenetic diversity within the section. Our goal is to highlight problematic groups and to stimulate further studies aimed primarily at understanding the taxonomic relationships and phylogeny of this evolutionarily young group.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Material and methods","content":"\u003cp\u003ePlant material and species identification\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDetermination of the studied taxa was based on the descriptions in the original species/subspecies descriptions, regional floras or studies dealing with their taxonomy. Specifically, we mostly accepted the recent treatments dealing with the respective species. Plant individuals were collected between 2004 and 2023 from natural populations across Europe, Caucasus and Israel, with emphasis to cover as much of the range of the taxa studied as possible (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Plants were transported and cultivated in the experimental garden of Palack\u0026yacute; University in Olomouc, Czech Republic. All analyses were done with the cultivated plants. The voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of Palack\u0026yacute; University in Olomouc (OL).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChromosome counts\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eActively growing, young roots were harvested from the pot-cultivated plants, pre-treated with 8-hydroxyquinoline (0.002 M) in darkness at room temperature for 4 h, fixed in a cold mixture of ethanol and acetic acid (3:1) overnight and then stored at 4\u0026deg;C until use. Selected root tips were hydrolysed in 5 N HCl for 25 minutes, stained with Schiff reagent for 40 minutes and squashed in 45% acetic acid (Lillie \u003cspan citationid=\"CR128\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1951\u003c/span\u003e). Preparations were photographed and counted using an Olympus CX-31 light microscope. Usually, at least five metaphases were counted for each individual studied.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlow cytometry\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlow cytometry (FCM) was used to estimate the DNA ploidy level (relative genome size, RGS, i.e. ratio of the 2C-peak of the sample to the 2C-peak of the internal standard; Suda et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR205\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e) and to determine nuclear DNA content, i.e. the holoploid genome size (absolute genome size, AGS; 2C value \u003cem\u003esensu\u003c/em\u003e Greilhuber et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR82\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e) of samples. The methodical recommendations of Sliwinska et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR195\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) were followed. Chromosome counts for selected individuals analysed by FCM served as reference material for the estimates obtained using FCM. The monoploid genome size (1Cx value \u003cem\u003esensu\u003c/em\u003e Greilhuber et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR82\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e) was calculated as the 2C value of the sample divided by its ploidy level. Samples were prepared according to the protocol described by Duchoslav et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e) and stained with propidium iodide (PI) with addition of RNAse (both 50 \u0026micro;g\u0026middot;ml\u0026ndash;\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e). The analyses were performed on a Partec PAS (Partec GmbH, M\u0026uuml;nster, Germany) or BD Accuri C6 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA) cytometer. \u003cem\u003eSecale cereale\u003c/em\u003e L. \u0026lsquo;Daňkovsk\u0026eacute;\u0026rsquo; (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16.19 pg; Doležel et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e); \u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lsquo;Saxana\u0026rsquo; (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;34.24 pg; Šaf\u0026aacute;řov\u0026aacute; and Duchoslav \u003cspan citationid=\"CR184\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e); \u003cem\u003ePisum sativum\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lsquo;Ctirad\u0026rsquo; (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8.75 pg; Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR229\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e); \u003cem\u003eVicia faba\u003c/em\u003e 'Inovec' (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;26.81 pg, the value recalculated to the primary standard \u003cem\u003eS. cereale\u003c/em\u003e) served as internal standards. Where multiple internal standards were used for FCM within a given taxon, the observed values based on the less frequently used standards were recalculated to the dominant standard and these values are presented.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeparate plants or mixed samples of up to four plants per population were measured for the RGS estimation. For each (mixed) sample, fluorescence intensity of usually 3,000 particles were recorded for the RGS estimations. If more peaks were identified in the mixed sample, measurements were repeated with each individual measured separately. The following measurement strategy was chosen to ensure validity of the AGS estimation: (i) all measurements were made over period when the plants were in an identical phenological phase of development, with young fresh leaves without any symptoms of senescence or pathogen attack (March to May), (ii) at least 5000 nuclei per sample were recorded, (iii) only CV for the G\u003csub\u003e0\u003c/sub\u003e/G\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e peaks of the standard and \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e samples below 5% were accepted, (iv) each sample was measured by the same operator at least three different times on different days and mean AGS value was calculated from these three measurements (Doležel et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBibliographic review on chromosome counts and GS\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn extensive bibliographic review was performed using the metadatabase CCDB (Rice et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR178\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e), the plant C-value database (Leitch et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR120\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) and additional own searches, providing a detailed list of chromosome numbers and nuclear DNA contents (2C values) estimated by different methods (FCM, Feulgen microdensitometry (FEM), Vickers M86 scanning microdensitometry (VIM), Hardie et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR92\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e; Doležel et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e) of the taxa of \u003cem\u003eA.\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e published to date. All records were critically reviewed from a taxonomic point of view to ensure correct determination and nomenclature, according to the original publications and recent taxonomic concepts, as well as by direct contact with the authors of the original descriptions, if possible. The assignment of the studied taxa to \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e usually followed the original description or later taxonomic revisions. Recently, \u0026Ouml;zhatay and Ko\u0026ccedil;yiğit (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR151\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) transferred 23 species, mostly described from Turkey and originally assigned to \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e, to \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eScorodon\u003c/em\u003e K. Koch. We present both taxonomic treatments in the review, i.e. with and without acceptance of the above-mentioned section change.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe majority of extracted chromosome data sets of the studied taxa (those with a given locality) were georeferenced. Distribution maps of the different ploidy levels were constructed for selected di-\u0026amp;polyploid and polyploid taxa with a large number of records. Additionally, all available GS estimates for \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e (Leitch et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR120\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) were extracted and used as a background GS data to describe the known variation in GS of the genus.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eData analyses\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrequency of different cytotype compositions of populations was estimated for each studied taxon based on the presence of cytotypes within populations. Frequency of each cytotype within each taxon was based on the total number of FCM-analysed individuals, ignoring their population assignment. Summary statistics of GS parameters were calculated for each studied taxon, based on population-level data. Relationship between genome size (AGS, RGS) and geographic coordinates (latitude, longitude) for selected ploidy levels of the taxa studied was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. Data were analysed in NCSS 9 (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.ncss.com\" target=\"_blank\"\u003ewww.ncss.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.ncss.com\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e). The maps were created in QGIS 3.28 (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.ncss.com\" target=\"_blank\"\u003ewww.qgis.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.qgis.org\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003e)\u003c/span\u003e, using the Terrain Elevation Above Sea Level map provided by the Global Solar Atlas 2.0 (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://globalsolaratlas.info\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://globalsolaratlas.info\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003e)\u003c/span\u003e as a background.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results and discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eChromosome number, DNA-ploidy level and GS assessment for 25 studied taxa\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe new data on the diversity and frequency of cytotypes in their populations and the RGS and AGS for each ploidy level in each taxon are summarised in Table\u0026nbsp;1, while Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e gives these data for the individual populations studied. Detailed bibliographic reviews of published karyological and GS data for the taxa studied are given in Tables S2 and S3, respectively. A total of 25 taxa were analysed by FCM (311 populations/1 582 individuals), with first AGS estimates provided for 16 taxa (Table\u0026nbsp;1). For nine taxa, several reports on nuclear DNA content have been published previously (Tables S3), whereas for two of them we detected the occurrence of new cytotypes. In five taxa more than one ploidy level was found. Chromosome numbers were counted for 21 taxa, with a new report for \u003cem\u003eA. rupestre\u003c/em\u003e Steven. Multiple ploidy levels were confirmed in four taxa. A commentary on the data obtained for each taxon studied is given below, together with critical assessment of the available literature.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium aetnense\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eBrullo, Pavone \u0026amp; Salmeri\u003c/b\u003e. \u0026ndash; The species is a regional endemic of Mt. Etna in Sicily (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of six plants from a population on the northern slopes of Mt. Etna revealed a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eA), consistent with the only previous report (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). Our AGS estimate is the first for the species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium carinatum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003esubsp.\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003ecarinatum\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e The subspecies is the most common member of an informal \u003cem\u003eA. carinatum\u003c/em\u003e complex (\u003cem\u003esensu\u003c/em\u003e Levan \u003cspan citationid=\"CR124\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1933\u003c/span\u003e; Stearn 1980), although in some taxonomic treatments (e.g. Jauzein and Tison \u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e) more complex treatment is applied, where \u003cem\u003eA. flexum\u003c/em\u003e Waldst. \u0026amp; Kit. and \u003cem\u003eA. consimile\u003c/em\u003e Jordan ex Gren. are separated from it as independent species. It is native to northern Turkey and most parts of Europe except southwestern and northwestern Europe, Finland, Belarus and Russia (POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of 464 plants from 77 populations revealed the presence of three cytotypes (Table\u0026nbsp;1): dominant triploids (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24), less frequent diploids (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16) and a very rare cytotype with the RGS corresponding to DNA-tetraploids, detected for the first time in this subspecies. The RGS data in di- and triploids were confirmed by chromosome counts (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eB,C), whereas this was not possible in the inferred DNA-tetraploids due to poor growth of the plants. Previously, two ploidy levels (i.e. 2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e, 3\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e) have been reported for this taxon in numerous studies (e.g. Levan \u003cspan citationid=\"CR124\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1933\u003c/span\u003e; Geitler and Tschermak-Woess \u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1962\u003c/span\u003e; Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e). Jauzein and Tison (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e) report tetraploid count for related \u003cem\u003eA. consimile\u003c/em\u003e from France. Since some authorities (POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) consider this species to be a synonym of \u003cem\u003eA. carinatum\u003c/em\u003e (=\u0026thinsp;\u003cem\u003eA. carinatum\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003ecarinatum\u003c/em\u003e), this count might be confirmation of supposed DNA-4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e we measured by FCM. However, we agree with Jauzein and Tison (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e) that its taxonomic status requires further study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition, aneuploids (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;25, 26) have rarely been documented in several Austrian populations (Tschermak-Woess \u003cspan citationid=\"CR218\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1947\u003c/span\u003e; Geitler and Tschermak-Woess \u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1962\u003c/span\u003e). However, later authors (e.g. Speta \u003cspan citationid=\"CR200\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1984\u003c/span\u003e; Wetschnig 1992), who have also detected supernumerary chromosomes in triploid Austrian populations, have presented them as B chromosomes. Similarly, Cheshmedzhiev (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1973\u003c/span\u003e) has reported the presence of a B chromosome in one triploid Bulgarian population (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePure triploid populations (79.2%) followed by pure diploid populations (14.3%) were the most frequent in our data set. Pure DNA-4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e and mixed 2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;3\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e and 2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;DNA-4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e populations were rare, accounting for a total of five populations (Table\u0026nbsp;1). Previously, only pure cytotype populations had been reported, with triploids being more common than diploids (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e). In agreement with published data, diploids and triploids had a similar geographical distribution and occurred throughout the range of the subspecies (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eA). Several new national records were found for both di- and triploids (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Putative DNA-4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e were found in three countries (Bulgaria, Italy, Slovakia).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe RGS of diploids showed a tendency for bimodal distribution and a significant geographical pattern of increasing RGS westwards (latitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = 0.341, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.195; longitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = -0.785, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eA). In triploids, RGS also increased westwards (latitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = 0.305, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.019; longitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = -0.485, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA), but the pattern was more complex, with occurrences of mosaic parapatry or mosaic sympatry of populations with high and low RGS (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eB). The AGS of diploids and triploids were variable, i.e. 31.2\u0026ndash;36.9 pg (mean 32.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.8 pg) and 45.0\u0026ndash;51.7 pg (mean 47.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.5 pg), respectively. The AGS of likely DNA-tetraploids was 56.7 pg (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eC). The 1Cx values decreased with increasing ploidy level (Table\u0026nbsp;1). Previous estimates of nuclear DNA content based on various techniques for both di- and triploids (Nagl and Fusenig \u003cspan citationid=\"CR141\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1979\u003c/span\u003e; Labani and Elkington \u003cspan citationid=\"CR117\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1987\u003c/span\u003e; Ohri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR147\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e; Baranyi and Greilhuber \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e; Šmarda et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR197\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) were within the range of the AGS we measured and followed the spatial patterns we observed (although sometimes reported with incorrect ploidy, as the authors did not count chromosomes), considering the geographical origin of the measured plants (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS3\u003c/span\u003e). Only one of the previously published DNA amounts (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;22.4 pg, B\u0026ouml;sen and Nagl \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1978\u003c/span\u003e) was completely different, most probably belonging to another species. Divergent AGS values we measured might suggest the existence of several lineages within the taxon and require additional study employing molecular markers.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium carinatum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003esubsp.\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003epulchellum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003e(Regel) Bonnier \u0026amp; Layens\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e The subspecies is distributed as native in southeastern France, southern parts of Central Europe, Italy, and southeastern Europe to western Romania (POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) and northeastern Turkey (Marmara region, Kollmann \u003cspan citationid=\"CR112\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1984\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of 120 plants from 21 populations (Table\u0026nbsp;1, Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e) revealed a single cytotype, identified as diploid by multiple chromosome counts (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16; Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eD). This agrees with numerous previous records of diploids from several European countries, the only exceptions being a triploid count (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;1B; Cheshmedzhiev \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1973\u003c/span\u003e) and several diploid counts with the presence of a B chromosome (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;1B; Cheshmedzhiev \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1973\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1975a\u003c/span\u003e) from Bulgaria (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eB, Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe RGS showed substantial variation (Table\u0026nbsp;1), with a significant increase towards the northwest (latitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = 0.620, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.003; longitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = -0.788, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB). The AGS followed the spatial pattern observed in the RGS, ranging from 28.1 to 38.8 pg with a mean of 33.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.60 pg (Table\u0026nbsp;1). The Bulgarian and Serbian populations had considerably lower RGS and AGS (-38%) than the other populations (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eD). So far, measurements of the nuclear DNA amount using FEM and FCM have been provided by Labani and Elkington (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR117\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1987\u003c/span\u003e) and Vesel\u0026yacute; et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR227\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e) for samples of unknown origin and SE France, respectively (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS3\u003c/span\u003e). Both agree well with the majority of our estimates. As the rather divergent AGS values were confirmed by chromosome counting, there are at least two diploid lineages within the taxon: one with lower AGS typical of the eastern localities and the other with higher AGS common to the more western localities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium daninianum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eBrullo, Pavone \u0026amp; Salmeri\u003c/b\u003e. \u0026ndash; Widespread representative of the \u003cem\u003eA. stamineum\u003c/em\u003e species group in the Middle East (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996a\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). FCM of 10 plants from three Israeli populations (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e) revealed a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eG). This is consistent with previous records of diploids from Israel and Lebanon (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e), with the occurrence of 1\u0026ndash;2 B chromosomes reported by Brullo et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996a\u003c/span\u003e) from the Coastal Galilee. Our AGS estimate is the first for the species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium dentiferum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eWebb and Berthel\u003c/b\u003e. \u0026ndash; The species is considered taxonomically critical due to confusion with \u003cem\u003eA. longispathum\u003c/em\u003e Redout\u0026eacute;. Some authorities (Bartolucci et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) and French authors (Jauzein and Tison \u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e; Dobignard and Chatelain \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Tison and de Foucault \u003cspan citationid=\"CR211\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e) treat \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e as a synonym of \u003cem\u003eA. longispathum\u003c/em\u003e, considering some diagnostic characters of the former species (especially the presence of interstaminal teeth) to be variable and not distinctive, whereas Brullo (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1991\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Brullo and Guarino \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) considers \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e to be distinct from \u003cem\u003eA. longispathum\u003c/em\u003e. The taxonomic confusion is related to the fact that both the protologue and the original illustration of \u003cem\u003eA. longispathum\u003c/em\u003e (Redoute 1811) and the lectotype designated by Wilde-Duyfjes (1976) do not allow an unequivocal morphological differentiation from some related species. The treatment on the origin and morphological variation and habitat of the type material of \u003cem\u003eA. longispathum\u003c/em\u003e by Jauzein and Tison (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e) and the recent photographs of plants of the species from the vicinity of the type locality (Bordeaux, France) on iNaturalist (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.inaturalist.org/observations/14161096\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/14161096\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) suggest that both taxa might be closely related, if not identical. If identical, the name \u003cem\u003eA. longispathum\u003c/em\u003e has priority over \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e (Jauzein and Tison \u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuring our research (Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al., unpubl. results) we observed two groups of plants: (i) plants that closely resembled the description of \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003esensu\u003c/em\u003e Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e), (ii) plants that differed from \u0026ldquo;typical\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e by shorter (4\u0026ndash;5.5 mm), apiculate, truncate or subobtuse petals with a slightly different colour (dirty white with pinkish to purplish strips or strikes), ovary cylindrical-elliptical, smooth or slightly papillose in the upper part, stamens exerted from the perigon and often inconspicuous or absent interstaminal teeths (provisionally labelled as \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum-pallens\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo;). The second group of plants mix characters of several species, i.e. they partly resemble the description of \u003cem\u003eA. longispathum\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003esensu\u003c/em\u003e Jauzein and Tison \u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e), but also \u003cem\u003eA. pallens\u003c/em\u003e L. p. p. (\u003cem\u003esensu\u003c/em\u003e Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). Genetic analysis is urgently needed to clarify the relationships within this complex, as the morphological variation observed could be partly due to hybridisation between \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eA. pallens\u003c/em\u003e, or introgression of \u003cem\u003eA. pallens\u003c/em\u003e into \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e, as speculated by Jauzein and Tison (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe FCM of 199 plants from 39 populations of \u0026ldquo;typical\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e) revealed two cytotypes, confirmed by several chromosome counts (Table\u0026nbsp;1, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eE,F): tetraploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32) and pentaploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;40), both also reported in previous reports, which were directly referred to as \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1991\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). However, in contrast to previous reports (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e) where tetraploids dominated (69%) over pentaploids (41%), our data suggest the opposite (4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e: 12.8%, 5\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e: 87.2%, Table\u0026nbsp;1). We confirmed previous records of tetraploids from Spain, Italy and Greece (Crete). Brullo et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1991\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e) also recorded tetraploids in Malta, Cyprus and Turkey (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e). Pentaploids were documented from Italy and France (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e), and we recorded them as new records for Croatia, Slovenia, Greece and Spain (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eC, Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Only pure-cytotype populations were found (Table\u0026nbsp;1). Several chromosome records attributed to the Bulgarian \u003cem\u003eA. pallens\u003c/em\u003e var. \u003cem\u003epallens\u003c/em\u003e by Cheshmedziev (1970, 1975b) may actually belong to \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e, considering the photographs of the analysed plants and the notes on their morphology made by the author in his later paper (Cheshmedziev 1975b). On the other hand, some chromosome reports (Cheshmedziev 1975c, 1977) of Bulgarian plants considered as \u003cem\u003eA. longispathum\u003c/em\u003e probably represent other, presently unidentified, species (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e). Ko\u0026ccedil;yiğit and \u0026Ouml;zhatay (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR110\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e) reported diploids of \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e for plants sampled in Turkey, but we consider this number to belong to other species.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe RGS in tetraploids were almost constant (latitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = 0.500, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.667; longitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = 0.500, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.667; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eE) while it showed intermediate variation in pentaploids, with nearly significant increase towards the east (latitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = -0.062, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.728; longitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = 0.340, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.053; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eF). The AGS of pentaploids followed the spatial pattern observed in the RGS, with the easternmost populations having about 5 pg (7%) higher AGS than the westermost populations (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Our AGS estimates are the first for the both ploidies, with the 1Cx values decreasing with increasing ploidy level (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTwenty-six plants of the nine populations assigned to the second group (\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum-pallens\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo;) were all found to be tetraploid (Table\u0026nbsp;1, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eH), which agrees with data from France for \u003cem\u003eA. longispathum\u003c/em\u003e (Jauzein and Tison \u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e). In contrast to tetraploid \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e, however, their RGS were more variable (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eG) and mean AGS was slightly shifted to lower values (Table\u0026nbsp;1, Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). These populations were found in Spain, Italy, Croatia, Bulgaria and Greece (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eD, Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e) and require additional taxonomic study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium flavum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eL\u003c/b\u003e. \u0026ndash; The taxonomy and cytogenetics of this species complex are still poorly understood. The most recent taxonomic treatment (POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) recognizes four infraspecific taxa: subsp. \u003cem\u003eflavum\u003c/em\u003e, subsp. \u003cem\u003eionochlorum\u003c/em\u003e Maire, subsp. \u003cem\u003etauricum\u003c/em\u003e (Besser ex Rchb.) K. Richt., and var. \u003cem\u003epilosum\u003c/em\u003e (Kollmann \u0026amp; Koyuncu) Ko\u0026ccedil;yiğit \u0026amp; \u0026Ouml;zhatay. In addition, several other taxa very similar in morphology to members of the \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e complex have been described from the Eastern Mediterranean and neighbouring regions, most of them being assigned into the informal \u003cem\u003eA. stamineum\u003c/em\u003e species group (see Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). In the Balkan Peninsula this is the case for \u003cem\u003eA. guicciardii\u003c/em\u003e Heldr. (see below) or \u003cem\u003eA. croaticum\u003c/em\u003e Bogdanović, Brullo, Mitić and Salmeri (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Bogdanović et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). Many karyological reports of \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e remain unclear, as they refer to \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e s.l., without further differentiation at the intraspecific level (Liveri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR130\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). However, in some cases, knowing the sampling location and the range of the taxon or taxonomic concept used in the respective study, it is possible to infer the infraspecific taxon for which the corresponding chromosome number was published (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe nominate subspecies (\u003cb\u003eA. flavum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003esubsp\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cb\u003eflavum\u003c/b\u003e, including var. \u003cem\u003eminus\u003c/em\u003e Boiss.) is distributed as native to southwestern and southern Europe, the southern part of Central Europe and southeastern Europe from southern France to Romania, and Turkey (POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of 337 plants from 76 populations revealed two cytotypes, confirmed by several chromosome counts (Table\u0026nbsp;1, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eI,J): diploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, 89.9%) and tetraploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32, 10.1%), both also reported in previous reports (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e), rarely with the presence of additional 1\u0026ndash;3 B chromosomes (see Vujošević et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR232\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e for survey). Cheshmedzhiev (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1970\u003c/span\u003e) also reported an aneuploid plant (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;33) from Bulgaria. In addition, triploids (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24) have rarely been reported from Bulgaria and Greece (Ved Brat \u003cspan citationid=\"CR226\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1965\u003c/span\u003e; Cheshmedzhiev \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1994\u003c/span\u003e), but solely for var. \u003cem\u003eminus\u003c/em\u003e (=\u0026thinsp;\u003cem\u003eA. webbii\u003c/em\u003e G. C. Clementi). Consistent with previous reports (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e), pure diploid populations were the most common (89.5%), followed by pure tetraploid populations (9.2%). Diploids were found throughout the range of the species, as previously reported (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eE). The occurrence of tetraploids has been reported from the Balkan Peninsula (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e) and from Granada, Spain (Ruiz Rej\u0026oacute;n and Sa\u0026ntilde;udo 1976). However, \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e is not considered to be present in Spain (Aedo \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e) and the count mentioned therefore belongs to a different species. The range of tetraploids increased towards the north (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eE), with new records for Romania, Hungary and Slovakia. We also found a 2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e mixed population in Slovakia, which is the first report of a mixed-ploidy population for the species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe RGS of diploids showed considerable variation (Table\u0026nbsp;1), with a significant increase towards the south-east (latitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = -0.285, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.020; longitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = 0.380, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.002; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eE, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eI). In tetraploids, the RGS showed much less variation (Table\u0026nbsp;1), but the RGS showed the opposite spatial pattern to the diploids, increasing towards the northwest (latitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = 0.714, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.047; longitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = -0.690, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.058; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eF, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eJ). Except for one measurement, the AGS of diploids had a unimodal pattern with a mean of 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;27.9 pg (Table\u0026nbsp;1), which is in good agreement with previous reports based on both FEM and FCM (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS3\u003c/span\u003e; Baranyi and Greilhuber \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e; Vesel\u0026yacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR227\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). An extremely low AGS (i.e. 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;21.4 pg) was detected for the population sampled near Minerve in southern France, far from the rest of the analysed populations (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). We interpret this value as a result of processes acting on isolated and/or marginal populations at the edge of the species' range (Šmarda and Bureš \u003cspan citationid=\"CR196\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). However, more samples from southwestern Europe are needed to draw a firm conclusion on the observed pattern.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe AGS of the tetraploids showed a bimodal pattern, with one population group originating from Bulgaria having AGS values between 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38 and 41 pg and the second group (Eastern Central Europe, Serbia) having AGS values between 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;42 and 46 pg (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eJ). These divergent AGS values were confirmed by chromosome counting (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e) and fit well with previous estimates of DNA content using various methods (Labani and Elkington \u003cspan citationid=\"CR117\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1987\u003c/span\u003e; Ohri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR147\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e; Baranyi and Greilhuber \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e; Ohri and Pistrick \u003cspan citationid=\"CR148\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e), although some of them (Labani and Elkington \u003cspan citationid=\"CR117\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1987\u003c/span\u003e; Ohri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR147\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e; Ohri and Pistrick \u003cspan citationid=\"CR148\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e) erroneously present them as diploid (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS3\u003c/span\u003e). The 1Cx values decreased with increasing ploidy level (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe subspecies \u003cb\u003eAllium flavum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003esubsp\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cb\u003etauricum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003e(Besser ex Rchb.) K. Richt\u003c/b\u003e. is native to southeastern Europe, Ukraine, European Russia, Kazakhstan, Caucasian countries, Turkey and Iran (POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Plants show rather variable size, shape and colouring of perigon, filaments and anthers (e.g. Vvedensky \u003cspan citationid=\"CR233\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1935\u003c/span\u003e; Stearn 1980; Cioc\u0026acirc;rlan \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e; Cheshmedzhiev \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e), which has probably led to the description of several taxa of low taxonomic rank (e.g. Zahariadi \u003cspan citationid=\"CR241\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1966\u003c/span\u003e; \u0026Ouml;zhatay and Ko\u0026ccedil;yiğit \u003cspan citationid=\"CR151\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), but also to species misidentifications (Bogdanović et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Tzanoudakis et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR220\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Recently, \u0026Ouml;zhatay and Ko\u0026ccedil;yiğit (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR151\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) questioned \u003cem\u003eA. paczoskianum\u003c/em\u003e as a synonym of \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003etauricum\u003c/em\u003e and consider both taxa as separate, different species. Furthermore, the possibility of confusion with morphologically very similar and rarely reported species of the \u003cem\u003eA. stamineum\u003c/em\u003e group, e.g. \u003cem\u003eA. guicciardii\u003c/em\u003e (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e)d \u003cem\u003ecroaticum\u003c/em\u003e (Bogdanović et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e), cannot be excluded in published records. The FCM of 62 plants from 19 populations revealed two cytotypes: karyologically confirmed tetraploids (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eK) and a cytotype with the RGS approximately 75% of that measured in tetraploids (Table\u0026nbsp;1). Despite the lack of chromosome counts for these lower RGS plants, we classify them as DNA-diploids, based on a similar pattern of RGS differences between diploids and tetraploids in the closely related \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003eflavum\u003c/em\u003e. However, to be sure, additional chromosome counts are desirable.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFour ploidy levels and two aneuploid counts were previously reported for this taxon (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e). Tetraploids were the most frequently reported ploidy, followed by diploids. This is consistent with our data, with pure tetraploid populations being the most common (73.7%), followed by pure DNA-diploid populations (26.3%), and no records of cytotype-mixed populations (Table\u0026nbsp;1). Cheshmedzhiev (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1975a\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1982\u003c/span\u003e) reported several additional cytotypes, mostly as single records from the Rhodopi Mts and the Thracian Lowlands in Bulgaria, i.e. penta- (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;40) and hexaploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;48) as well as tetraploid with 0\u0026ndash;3 B chromosomes and aneuploids with 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;33 and 34.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrevious records suggested partially different distribution patterns of diploids and tetraploids, with diploids reported from the Caucasus (Pogosian \u003cspan citationid=\"CR162\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1983\u003c/span\u003e; Magulaev \u003cspan citationid=\"CR133\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e), Turkey (Tanker and Kurucu \u003cspan citationid=\"CR206\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1979\u003c/span\u003e sub \u003cem\u003eA. amphipulchellum\u003c/em\u003e Zahar.; Johnson and Brandham \u003cspan citationid=\"CR103\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e), Northern and Southern Greece (Strid and Franz\u0026eacute;n \u003cspan citationid=\"CR203\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1981\u003c/span\u003e; Tzanoudakis and Vosa \u003cspan citationid=\"CR221\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e sub \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e) and the island of Lesvos (Karavokyrou and Tzanoudakis \u003cspan citationid=\"CR106\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1991\u003c/span\u003e sub \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e), and tetraploids from Bulgaria (Cheshmedzhiev \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1970\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1975a\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1982\u003c/span\u003e) and Turkey (\u0026Ouml;zhatay \u003cspan citationid=\"CR149\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1990\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR150\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e). We recorded diploids as a new cytotype for Bulgaria and North Macedonia, and tetraploids as a new cytotype for Ukraine and North Macedonia (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Bulgaria represents the most cytotype-diverse region (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eF, Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe range of RGS in DNA-diploids was relatively narrow (Table\u0026nbsp;1), with an almost significant increase towards the east (latitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = -0.154, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.804; longitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = 0.872, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.054; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eF, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eK). In tetraploids, RGS was variable with a significant increase towards the southwest (latitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = -0.688, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.007; longitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = -0.842, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eF, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eL), i.e. opposite to that found in DNA-diploids. The pattern of AGS followed that of RGS. Outlier RGS/AGS values were recorded from two Bulgarian populations, which were approximately 2\u0026ndash;4 pg higher than those of the remaining tetraploid populations (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Whether this could be an indication of taxonomic heterogeneity should be the subject of future investigation. There is only one nuclear DNA estimate using FEM, which was erroneously reported as diploid (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;39.6 pg, Vakhtina et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR224\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e), although according to our measurements it is more likely to be tetraploid. The mean 1Cx of the tetraploids was lower than that of the diploids (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium garbarii\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003ePeruzzi\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e The species is endemic to the Calabrian coast in Italy (Peruzzi \u003cspan citationid=\"CR158\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of four plants from the \u003cem\u003elocus classicus\u003c/em\u003e revealed a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eL), confirming previous results (Peruzzi \u003cspan citationid=\"CR158\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium guicciardii\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eHeldr\u003c/b\u003e. \u0026ndash; The species of the \u003cem\u003eA. stamineum\u003c/em\u003e group is only very rarely reported in the literature, although it is reported to occur in Central and Northern Greece and Romania (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e) and is considered to be a Greek endemic with a limited range (Dimopoulos et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). We observed a northern Greek population that clearly belonged to the \u003cem\u003eA. flavum/A. stamineum\u003c/em\u003e groups, but differed from typical nominate \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e by yellow-greenish perigon and stamens white below and violet above. Though literature is not consistent in diagnostic characters to unequivocally distinguish this species from closely related taxa (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Bogdanović et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e), we provisionally assign this population to \u003cem\u003eA. guicciardii\u003c/em\u003e. The FCM of eight plants revealed a single cytotype (Table\u0026nbsp;1), which was not confirmed by chromosome counting (material not available). However, considering the RGS/AGS of plants analysed and those of closely related \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e s. str., a diploid ploidy level is suggested for these plants. Previously, diploids (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16; Alden \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1976\u003c/span\u003e) and tetraploids (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32; Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e) have been reported for \u003cem\u003eA. guicciardii\u003c/em\u003e, with both ploidy levels occurring in Greece and tetraploids occurring also in Romania (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium hermoneum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003e(Kollmann \u0026amp; Shmida) Brullo, Guglielmo, Pavone \u0026amp; Salmeri\u003c/b\u003e. \u0026ndash; The species is reported to occur in the alpine belt of the Anti-Lebanon Mts in Syria, Israel and Lebanon (Kollmann and Shmida \u003cspan citationid=\"CR114\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e; Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Danin and Fragman-Sapir 2016+). FCM analysis and chromosome counting of two plants from two micropopulations between the peaks of Mt. Habushic and Mt. Hermon (Israel) revealed a single cytotype, identified as tetraploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eM). Previously, Shmida and Kollmann (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR114\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e) and Kollmann (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR113\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1985\u003c/span\u003e) reported both diploid and tetraploid chromosome numbers for samples collected at the type locality (Mt. Hermon). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium karsianum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eFomin\u003c/b\u003e. \u0026ndash; The range of this species is restricted to NE Turkey and the Transcaucasus (POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). It is closely related to \u003cem\u003eA. kunthianum\u003c/em\u003e Vved. from which it is problematic to distinguish due to contradictions in diagnostic characters in regional floras and frequently reported intermediates (e.g. Vvedensky \u003cspan citationid=\"CR233\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1935\u003c/span\u003e; Oganesian and Agababian \u003cspan citationid=\"CR145\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of five plants from three populations from Georgia and Armenia revealed a single cytotype (Table\u0026nbsp;1), identified as diploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eN), confirming previous diploid records from Armenia (Pogosian \u003cspan citationid=\"CR162\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1983\u003c/span\u003e) and Turkey (\u0026Ouml;zhatay \u003cspan citationid=\"CR150\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e). Our AGS estimate for three populations of diploids was very narrow, around 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;35.4 pg (Table\u0026nbsp;1). There is only one previous AGS report by FEM (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;28.5 pg) for diploids of unknown origin by Vakhtina et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR224\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e), which is, however, quite distant from our data.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium kunthianum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eVved\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e This species, which is closely related to \u003cem\u003eA. karsianum\u003c/em\u003e (see above), is reported to occur in Iran, North Caucasus, Transcaucasus and Turkey (POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of ten plants from three populations from Georgia revealed a single cytotype, identified as diploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eO), confirming the previous diploid records from Georgia (Gagnidze et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR136\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) and Armenia (e.g. Pogosian \u003cspan citationid=\"CR162\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1983\u003c/span\u003e, Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e). Vakhtina and Kudryashova (1985) also report a tetraploid count from Armenia. Our AGS estimate for three populations of diploids was very narrow, around 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32.4 pg (Table\u0026nbsp;1). There is only one previous AGS report by FEM (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;35.1 pg) for diploids of unknown origin by Vakhtina et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR224\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e), which is rather closer to our AGS of \u003cem\u003eA. karsianum\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium macedonicum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eZahar\u003c/b\u003e. \u0026ndash; This rare species is reported to occur in the Pangaion Hills (NE Greece), from where it was described (Zahariadi \u003cspan citationid=\"CR242\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1975\u003c/span\u003e), and NC Greece (Dimopoulos et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). A specimen from a locality in the southern part of North Macedonia, close to known distribution range, has 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;28.9 pg, which could be considered as DNA-diploid, based on the only diploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16) chromosome report (Papanicolaou \u003cspan citationid=\"CR154\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1984\u003c/span\u003e) and the similarity of the AGS value with that of the related species of the \u003cem\u003eA. paniculatum\u003c/em\u003e L. group (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium melanantherum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003ePančić\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e This rare Balkan endemic species occurs in Bulgaria, Serbia, Kosovo, North Macedonia and northern Greece (Anderson 1991; Anačkov \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Assyov et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Teofilovski \u003cspan citationid=\"CR209\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Dimopoulos et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of 14 plants from two nearby populations in the Rila Mts (Bulgaria) revealed a single cytotype, identified as triploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eP). Our chromosome count confirms previous triploid records (some of which indicate the presence of 0\u0026ndash;1 B chromosomes) from Bulgaria, from which diploids (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16) and tetraploids (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32) have also been reported (Cheshmedzhiev \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1970\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1971\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1976\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1979\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e). Triploids have also been reported from northern Greece (Tzanoudakis and Vosa \u003cspan citationid=\"CR221\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e, Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e). Our AGS estimate is the first for triploids (Table\u0026nbsp;1). Previously, AGS of tetraploids (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;47.5 pg) was estimated using FEM (Ohri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR147\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e; Ohri and Pistrick \u003cspan citationid=\"CR148\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e). The 1Cx value of tetraploids were found to be lower than that of triploids (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, Table).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium oporinanthum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eBrullo, Pavone \u0026amp; Salmeri\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e The species is considered a northwestern Mediterranean species, occurring in Spain, France (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997a\u003c/span\u003e) and the Aosta Valley in the northwestern Italy (Rey et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR176\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of 65 plants from 11 populations revealed a single cytotype, which was identified as tetraploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32, Table\u0026nbsp;1, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eQ), confirming previous tetraploid records from several localities in Spain and France (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997a\u003c/span\u003e; Jauzein and Tison \u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e). The range of RGS and AGS values were relatively narrow, and our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium orestis\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eKalpoutz., Trigas \u0026amp; Constantin\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e The species was described from the Parnon Mt and Taigetos Mt of the southern Peloponnese, Greece (Kalpoutzakis et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR105\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of nine plants from the \u003cem\u003elocus classicus\u003c/em\u003e resulted in a single cytotype, which was identified as diploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16) by the authors of the species description (Kalpoutzakis et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR105\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium pallens\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eL.\u003c/b\u003e \u0026ndash; Widespread semi-ruderal species in the Mediterranean (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). FCM of 121 plants from 19 populations, clearly matching the species description in Brullo et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e), yielded a single cytotype identified as tetraploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32, Table\u0026nbsp;1, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eR). Our chromosome counts confirm previous tetraploid records from several European, Turkish and north-African localities (e.g. Jauzein and Tison \u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e; Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eF), frequently referred under the names \u003cem\u003eA. coppoleri\u003c/em\u003e Tineo or \u003cem\u003eA. stearnii\u003c/em\u003e Pastor \u0026amp; Vald\u0026eacute;s (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e). Reported diploid records (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e), e.g. from Spain (e.g. Pastor \u003cspan citationid=\"CR155\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1982\u003c/span\u003e; Ru\u0026iacute;z Rej\u0026oacute;n et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR182\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR183\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1986\u003c/span\u003e), Greece (Karavokyrou and Tzanoudakis \u003cspan citationid=\"CR106\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1991\u003c/span\u003e) and Turkey (Ved Brat \u003cspan citationid=\"CR226\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1965\u003c/span\u003e) likely belong to other, presently unidentifiable, species and require further study, owing to frequent misidentification or misinterpretation of the species (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e), and are not presented in the map (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eF). The range of RGS and AGS values of tetraploids was relatively wide, with a clear increase towards the northwest (RGS: latitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = 0.515, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.029; longitude: r\u003csub\u003es\u003c/sub\u003e = -0.492, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.038; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003eH). The AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium praescissum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eRchb\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e The species is distributed from east of the Dnieper River in Ukraine to western Siberia and typically occurs on saline soils (Dobrochaeva et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e; Seregin \u003cspan citationid=\"CR190\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Sinitsina \u003cspan citationid=\"CR194\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of eight plants from a Russian population revealed a single cytotype. Despite the lack of chromosome counts for these plants, we classify them as DNA-diploids, based on the similarity of our AGS estimates (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;31.6 pg, Table\u0026nbsp;1) to the karyologically verified nuclear DNA content using FEM (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;28.5 pg) by Vakhtina et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR224\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e). Zakirova and Nafanailova (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR240\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e) reported diploids also from Kazakhstan (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium pseudostamineum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eKollmann \u0026amp; Shmida\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e This endemic species is native to Israel, Syria and Lebanon (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) and was described from Mt. Hermon in the Anti-Lebanon Mts (Kollmann and Shmida \u003cspan citationid=\"CR114\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e). FCM analysis of a single plant from the population between the peaks of Mt. Habushic and Mt. Hermon (Israel) revealed a single cytotype, identified as a DNA-diploid, consistent with the previous report of 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16 from the type locality (Shmida and Kollmann \u003cspan citationid=\"CR114\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium rhodopeum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eVelen\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e This rare species is native to Bulgaria, Serbia, North Macedonia, Albania, Greece and Turkey (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e; Barina and Pifko 2011; Nikolov \u003cspan citationid=\"CR143\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of 31 plants from five populations sampled in Bulgaria and Greece revealed a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, Table\u0026nbsp;1, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eS). This confirms previous diploid records from other regions of Bulgaria (Cheshmedzhiev \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1970\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1973\u003c/span\u003e), Greece (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e) and Turkey (\u0026Ouml;zhatay \u003cspan citationid=\"CR149\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1990\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR150\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e). Ricci (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR177\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1965\u003c/span\u003e) published tetraploid count (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32) in a plant of unknown origin but we omit this count due to uncertainty of the species determination. Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium rupestre\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eSteven\u003c/b\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e The species occurs in Crimea, Turkey and Caucasus (Vvedensky \u003cspan citationid=\"CR233\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1935\u003c/span\u003e; POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of 23 plants from six populations sampled in Georgia and Crimea revealed four distinct RGS/AGS groups. Most of our AGS estimates are the first for the species (Table\u0026nbsp;1). Three groups with increasing AGS mean of 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;22.3, 29.0 and 42.9 pg probably represent a polyploid series with basic chromosome number \u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7 and chromosome numbers 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;14, 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;21 and 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;28, respectively (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eT, U, V). The 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;14 is most likely the first such count for the species. However, Vakhtina and Kudryashova (1985) commented on the possibility that a count of 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;14 for \u003cem\u003eA. kunthianum\u003c/em\u003e by Vakhtina (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR222\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1964\u003c/span\u003e) might actually belong to \u003cem\u003eA. rupestre\u003c/em\u003e. Chromosome counts of 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;21 and 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;28 have already been published for individuals sampled in the Crimea (Ukraine) and the foothills of the Caucasus (Georgia), respectively (Vakhtina and Kudryashova 1985).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother group with an AGS of 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38.6 pg, intermediate between the AGS of the tri- and tetraploids (see above) is represented by plants from a population originating from Georgia (Table\u0026nbsp;1), for which we counted 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24 (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eW). A very similar nuclear DNA amount (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;37.8 pg) was also measured for plants originating from the other Georgian locality (Borjomi), from which a chromosome number 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24 was previously reported (Ohri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR147\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e; Ohri and Pistrick \u003cspan citationid=\"CR148\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e). The authors consider this chromosome count to be triploid, based on \u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8 and two diploid reports (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16) from Armenia (Pogosian 1990) and Turkey (\u0026Ouml;zhatay \u003cspan citationid=\"CR150\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e). These rare records suggest a rather complicated evolution within the species and require more detailed research over the whole Caucasian region.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium telmatum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eBogdanović, Brullo, Giusso \u0026amp; Salmeri\u003c/b\u003e. \u0026ndash; The species is endemic to the northwestern Croatian coast (Bogdanović et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of ten plants from one population revealed a single cytotype identified as tetraploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eS). Our chromosome count confirms previous records from two localities (Bogdanović et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e) close to newly sampled locality. Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium tenuiflorum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eTen\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e This Mediterranean species is reported to occur in southern Europe from southeastern France to Bulgaria and in Libya (POWO \u003cspan citationid=\"CR165\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). However, the species is critical because of its morphological similarity to some other species such as \u003cem\u003eA. pallens\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e (Jauzein and Tison \u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e; Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). The taxonomic status of the eastern Balkan populations (e.g. Bulgaria) also requires further study. FCM of 24 plants from five populations sampled at the southern edge of its range in Italy (cf. Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e) and 12 plants from two localities in Croatia (Istria, N Dalmatia) yielded a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, Table\u0026nbsp;1, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eY), confirming previous diploid records (rarely with 1\u0026ndash;6 B chromosomes) from Italy (e.g. Marcucci and Tornadore \u003cspan citationid=\"CR135\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1994\u003c/span\u003e; Jauzein and Tison \u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e; Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Peruzzi \u003cspan citationid=\"CR157\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Tornadore and Marcucci \u003cspan citationid=\"CR213\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e), Croatia (Puizina et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR168\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e) and Bulgaria (Cheshmedzhiev \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1975c\u003c/span\u003e). In addition, Fernandes and Queiros (1971) also reported diploid count, but for a plant of unknown origin, so this count must be considered doubtful. Apart from diploids, there are two records of triploids, one from Hy\u0026egrave;res in southern France (Jauzein and Tison \u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e) and one from Apulia in southern Italy (Tornadore \u003cspan citationid=\"CR212\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1981\u003c/span\u003e). The pentaploids (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;40) reported by Vosa (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR231\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1976\u003c/span\u003e) from central Italy clearly belong to another species, most probably \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e. The ranges of RGS and AGS of the diploids we analysed were wide, with a weak tendency of Croatian populations towards slightly higher GS compared to Italian populations (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAllium valdesianum\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eBrullo, Pavone \u0026amp; Salmeri\u003c/b\u003e. \u003cem\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e The species is endemic to the alpine belt of Sierra Nevada Mts in Spain (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996b\u003c/span\u003e). The FCM of five plants from a population in the northwestern part of the Sierra Nevada Mts revealed a single cytotype identified as diploid (2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;16, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003eZ), in agreement with the only previous diploid record from the \u003cem\u003elocus classicus\u003c/em\u003e (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996b\u003c/span\u003e), which is almost identical to our locality. Our AGS estimate is the first for this species (Table\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePloidy variation and frequency in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e: overview\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe issue of high chromosomal variation in the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e has long been of interest since the benchmarking studies of Levan (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR123\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1931\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR124\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1933\u003c/span\u003e). A recent review found that only 3.2% of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e species are pure polyploids (exclusively 4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e), but almost 30.2% of species within the genus show intraspecific variation in ploidy levels, up to eight ploidies (2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e-10\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e; Han et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). However, only a subset of species of \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e, sometimes even with inaccurate cytotype composition, was included in Han\u0026rsquo;s review. Almost half of the taxa (i.e. 44%) we screened using FCM were polyploid or di-\u0026amp;polyploid, with tetraploids/DNA-tetraploids being the most common polyploid cytotype (Table\u0026nbsp;1). The synthesis of our new data (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e) and the published chromosomal/DNA-ploidy data for 160 recognised taxa of \u003cem\u003eA.\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e (Tables S2, S4, all taxa summarised in Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS5\u003c/span\u003e) showed that 32 species (20.0% of total) have no data on their ploidy. Moreover, many older chromosome number records in specimens assigned by the given authors especially to members of the \u003cem\u003eA. paniculatum\u003c/em\u003e complex (e.g. \u003cem\u003eA. paniculatum\u003c/em\u003e L., \u003cem\u003eA. fuscum\u003c/em\u003e Waldst. \u0026amp; Kit.) should be considered with caution or even excluded due to species misconception/misidentification (Salmeri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR186\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR229\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; see Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS4\u003c/span\u003e for details). Considering only reliable records of taxa with at least one chromosome record (128 taxa), diploid taxa are dominant (71.1%), while di-\u0026amp;polyploid and pure polyploid taxa are less common, occurring at similar frequencies of 12.5% and 16.4%, respectively (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA). After excluding taxa that were recently transferred to another section according to \u0026Ouml;zhatay and Ko\u0026ccedil;yiğit (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR151\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), 80 out of 116 taxa with at least one chromosome count are diploid (69.0%), 16 di-\u0026amp;polyploid (13.8%) and 20 polyploid only (17.2%, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB). While proportion of diploid species is consistent with the overall pattern observed in the entire genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e (Han et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), proportion of di-\u0026amp;polyploid and polyploid taxa within the \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e is apparently different from those found by Han et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). We explain these differences by using a narrower and more critical species concept and more detailed survey in our study compared to Han et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDetailed insight into ploidy composition in di-\u0026amp;polyploid and polyploid taxa shows that 4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e, 3\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e, 2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;3\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e and 2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;3\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e taxa are dominant, while frequencies of other ploidies and/or their combinations are rare (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eC, Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS5\u003c/span\u003e), e.g. pentaploid \u003cem\u003eA. pseudotelmatum\u003c/em\u003e Duchoslav \u0026amp; Jandov\u0026aacute;, hexaploid \u003cem\u003eA. exaltatum\u003c/em\u003e (Meikle) Brullo, Pavone, Salmeri \u0026amp; Venora, and up to hexaploid \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003etauricum\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eAllium oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e L. shows the most intriguing ploidy composition ranging from tri- to octoploids (for details Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). This contrasts with Han et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), who found the 2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e combination to be the most common (46.3%) within di-\u0026amp;polyploid and polyploid \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e species. In addition, our synthesis adds some new cytotype combinations not covered by Han et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), suggesting a high diversity of cytotype composition within \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e. It also shows that the true proportion of mixed ploidy species may be underestimated due to the sample-size limitations of classical chromosome counting (Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), and mixed populations may not be detected at all, although reports of different cytotypes coexisting in the same regions in several taxa (Tables S1, S2, S4) might suggest this. In this respect, the use of more convenient and efficient FCM is beneficial (Siljak-Yakovlev et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR192\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Sliwinska et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR195\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), although its use within the genus is still scarce (but see Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR229\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR230\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, contrary to our expectations (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e), we recorded only four mixed-ploidy populations, representing 1.3% of the populations analysed, and in only two taxa, \u003cem\u003eA. carinatum\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003ecarinatum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003eflavum\u003c/em\u003e (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Adding previously published population-level ploidy data (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS4\u003c/span\u003e), only three other taxa in the section (\u003cem\u003eA. oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eA. paniculatum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eA. marginatum\u003c/em\u003e Janka) had reported ploidy-mixed populations. Apart from the unique \u003cem\u003eA. oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e with complex ploidy structure of populations (Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), only 2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;3\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e and 2\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e populations were rarely found in the above four mentioned taxa (Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS4\u003c/span\u003e), which is far below the average percentage (16.1%) of populations with multiple cytotypes found in 39 mixed-ploidy species (Kol\u0026aacute;ř et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR111\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). However, in contrast to our study, the majority of studies reviewed by Kol\u0026aacute;ř et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR111\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) were specifically designed to detect within-population ploidy diversity by sampling a high number of individuals per population (16 \u003cem\u003evs.\u003c/em\u003e 5 on average, Kol\u0026aacute;ř et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR111\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e \u003cem\u003evs.\u003c/em\u003e our study) and extensively covering the entire area of the population, which has been shown to increase the probability of detecting multiple ploidies (Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Therefore, the combination of intensive within-population sampling and FCM may increase the frequency of mixed-ploidy populations, especially within the taxa with increased vegetative reproduction (bulbils, bulblets), which may help different cytotypes to overcome the process of minority cytotype exclusion in local sympatry (Herben et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR94\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Kol\u0026aacute;ř et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR111\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe spatial pattern of ploidy diversity of taxa from \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e across Europe and adjacent regions is shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD. Diploid taxa dominate in the eastern Mediterranean, where they represent more than 85% of all taxa with counted chromosome numbers. The proportion of diploid taxa gradually decreases both westwards and northwards, with only polyploid taxa present in northern and northwestern Europe. The dominance and diversity of diploid taxa in the Eastern Mediterranean and the adjacent Irano-Turanian region are explained by the fact that these regions are considered as genus/section evolutionary centres (Hanelt \u003cspan citationid=\"CR90\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e; Fritsch and Friesen \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e; Friesen et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e), from which the ancestors of extant species migrated westward in the past, e.g. across newly opened dry environments during the Messinian salinity crisis (Krijgsman et al. 1999; Tr\u0026aacute;jer et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR214\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e), followed by evolution in isolation of newly colonised regions after the marine transgression at the end of the Tertiary (Garcia-Castellanos et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR77\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). This east-west phylogeographical break has frequently been inferred, and sometimes dated in various plant groups (Nieto Feliner \u003cspan citationid=\"CR142\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). Several authors (e.g., Bogdanović et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Salmeri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR186\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e) hypothesised this scenario as very likely in autumn-flowering taxa of \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e, where all but one (\u003cem\u003eA. apolloniensis\u003c/em\u003e Biel et al.) extant taxa in Eastern Mediterranean are diploid while those occurring westward are (paleo-)polyploids (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997b\u003c/span\u003e; Bogdanović et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; \u0026Ouml;zhatay et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR152\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e), with both groups forming different subclades in the concatenated nr-ITS and cp-DNA tree (Salmeri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR186\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA high proportion of diploid taxa, often endemic, is also associated with regions of climatic, geological and topographical complexity with less harmful glaciation effects during the Quaternary (Hughes and Woodward \u003cspan citationid=\"CR99\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Noroozi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR144\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), e.g. Turkey and Greece but also southern Italy and Sicily (Peruzzi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR160\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). This scenario is considered to be the most parsimonious explanation of high species diversity and endemism in many species\u0026rsquo; complexes in the Mediterranean region (Nieto Feliner \u003cspan citationid=\"CR142\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOn the other hand, more northern regions of Europe are dominated by di-\u0026amp;polyploid or only polyploid taxa of the section (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD) or higher ploidies (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eC, F), and also the most widespread taxa of the section are polyploids (e.g. \u003cem\u003eA. oleraceu\u003c/em\u003em, Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; A. \u003cem\u003edentiferum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eA. pallens\u003c/em\u003e; see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eC,D). Observed increase of polyploid taxa towards north fits well with the common pattern observed worldwide (Rice et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR179\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) and reflect the strong influence of the Quaternary glacial cycles on the flora of central and northern Europe (Hewitt \u003cspan citationid=\"CR95\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e), as well as the adaptive advantage of polyploidisation and hybridisation within the section (Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), which might resulted from secondary contacts during postglacial range expansions (Schmitt \u003cspan citationid=\"CR188\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). The high proportion of polyploid and mixed-ploidy taxa within the section is considered a sign of ongoing diversification (Tzanoudakis and Vosa 1985; Hanelt \u003cspan citationid=\"CR90\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e), which is likely to have played a role in the ecological radiation of \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e into newly emerging habitats, especially those with mesic climates and/or fertile conditions, as demonstrated by Han et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) for the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e. Indeed, many widely distributed polyploid taxa of this section dominate in mesic and/or fertile, frequently anthropogenic, disturbed habitats (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR230\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Also, relatively high frequency of odd ploidy taxa/levels within taxa (especially 3x) observed within the section is uncommon in polyploid plants (Kol\u0026aacute;ř et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR111\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) because odd ploidy causes meiotic irregularities leading to a reduction of the seed set and thus fitness of newly emerging polyploid (Ramsey and Schemske \u003cspan citationid=\"CR171\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR172\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). However, polyploid members of the section either form or increase their vegetative reproduction \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e production of aerial bulbils or underground bulblets (e.g. triploid \u003cem\u003eA. corsicum\u003c/em\u003e, Jauzein et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR102\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e; polyploid \u003cem\u003eA. oleraceu\u003c/em\u003em, Fialov\u0026aacute; and Duchoslav \u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e), which allow them to establish, persist within a site and disperse to new areas (H\u0026ouml;randl \u003cspan citationid=\"CR98\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e) and thus overcome reproductive constraints.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRobust data explaining the origin of di-\u0026amp;polyploid and polyploid \u003cem\u003eA.\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e species are limited and mostly based on interpretation of mitotic chromosome arrangements (e.g. Pastor \u003cspan citationid=\"CR155\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1982\u003c/span\u003e; Bogdanović et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e) or GS (e.g. Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR229\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR230\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Therefore, the origin of most of these taxa is generally not clarified, but only outlined in literature, and both evolutionary pathways of polyploid formation (auto- and allopolyploidy) are briefly discussed. For example, some tetraploid species are considered to be either autotetraploid (e.g. \u003cem\u003eA. occultum\u003c/em\u003e Tzanoud. \u0026amp; Trigas; Tzanoudakis and Trigas \u003cspan citationid=\"CR219\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) or allotetraploid (e.g. \u003cem\u003eA. apergii\u003c/em\u003e Trigas, Iatro\u0026uacute; \u0026amp; Tzanoud.; Trigas et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR216\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). For some di-\u0026amp;polyploid species containing tri- and/or tetraploids in addition to diploids (e.g. \u003cem\u003eA. paniculatum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eA. marginatum\u003c/em\u003e), autopolyploid origin is postulated based on both GS and molecular markers (Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR229\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), whereas for polyploid 4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e-5\u003cem\u003ex A. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e and 3\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e-8\u003cem\u003ex A. oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e allopolyploid origin is most likely (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e and references therein).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRare dysploidy in \u003cem\u003eA. rupestre\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTraditionally, several basic chromosome numbers have been distinguished within the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e, ranging from \u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7 to \u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;11 (Jones and Rees \u003cspan citationid=\"CR104\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1968\u003c/span\u003e; Friesen et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e). The most common is \u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8, which is dominant in the majority of subgenera (Fritsch et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR74\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e), including the subgenus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e (Ved Brat \u003cspan citationid=\"CR226\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1965\u003c/span\u003e; Peruzzi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR159\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Han et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), and has also been inferred as the ancestral basic chromosome number by ancestral state reconstruction (Peruzzi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR159\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). Consistent with previous knowledge, all but one of the species we analysed had \u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8. When studying \u003cem\u003eA. rupestre\u003c/em\u003e populations, we found, besides 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;24, corresponding to 3\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e with \u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8, a polyploid series 2\u003cem\u003ex\u0026ndash;\u003c/em\u003e3\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026ndash;4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e with 2n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;14, 21 and 28 (see also Vakhtina and Kudryashova 1985). So far, these results indicate a descending dysploidy leading to \u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7, which is very unusual for members of \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e, as well as for the subgenus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e (Mathew \u003cspan citationid=\"CR138\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e; Peruzzi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR159\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Babin and Bell \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), where only a few dysploid (\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7) species are known, e.g. from the \u003cem\u003eA.\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCupanioscordum\u003c/em\u003e Ceschm. (Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Trigas et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR217\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e), which is sister to the \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e (Li et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR126\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGeneral patterns of GS variation within the \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur work represents the first comprehensive study of GS in \u003cem\u003eA.\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e, increasing by 78% the number of taxa for which GS is now known (Leitch et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR120\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). AGS estimation revealed a 2.6-fold difference in nuclear DNA content, ranging from 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;22.3 pg, which is the lowest known AGS within this section, to 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;58.5 pg (Table\u0026nbsp;1, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA). Previously, Jones and Rees (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR104\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1968\u003c/span\u003e) reported an even lower 2C value (18.4 pg) than the lowest we measured within this section, but this record certainly belongs to other species, probably from another section (Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR229\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Adding previous AGS records of other measured species in this section (Leitch et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR120\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), including the highly polyploid \u003cem\u003eA. oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e (Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e), this difference is even larger, up to 4.1-fold, with the maximum known 2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;92.1 pg in octoploid \u003cem\u003eA. oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA, Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS3\u003c/span\u003e). This variation covers most of the known range of AGS in the whole genus (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA inset), with the exception of several species from other sections that either have lower AGS, with the lowest AGS (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;15.2\u0026ndash;16.9 pg) found in \u003cem\u003eA. schoenoprasum\u003c/em\u003e L. (Jones and Rees \u003cspan citationid=\"CR104\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1968\u003c/span\u003e; Baranyi and Greilhuber \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e), or an extremely high AGS record in \u003cem\u003eA. validum\u003c/em\u003e S. Watson (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;148.9 pg, Ohri et al. 1996). The AGS of the analysed section members indicate that the section belongs to the plant groups with either large or very large GS \u003cem\u003esensu\u003c/em\u003e Leitch et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR119\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe observed GS variation in \u003cem\u003eA.\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e is mainly due to polyploidy (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA), which has a strong influence on the genus evolution (e.g. Friesen \u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e; Hanelt et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR91\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e; Gurushidze et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR87\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Han et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Wang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR235\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), but is also crucial for ecological radiation in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e (Wu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR239\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Han et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Wang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR235\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Increased chromosome number due to polyploidy resulted in higher 2C values but lower 1Cx values in all but two cases of single ploidy in two taxa examined that were represented by multiple ploidy levels (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA,B). As previously documented, polyploid formation is often associated with DNA loss, such that polyploids often exhibit lower 1Cx values compared to their diploid/low ploidy relatives. This genome reduction may be a mechanism that promotes the success of autopolyploid/allopolyploid speciation (e.g. Ozkan et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR153\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Leitch and Bennett \u003cspan citationid=\"CR118\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e; Poggio et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR161\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Wang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR234\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Notable differences in the difference between 1Cx values of di- and tetraploids observed in some diploid-polyploid taxa (e.g. \u003cem\u003eA. flavum versus A. carinatum\u003c/em\u003e) may be related to the age of the polyploids, with a small decrease in 1Cx typical of very young polyploids (neopolyploids), where processes leading to genome downsizing have not yet taken place (Ekrt et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Bressler et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Wang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR234\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Pungaršek and Frajman \u003cspan citationid=\"CR169\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). This may also explain why the 2C values of some (neoauto-)triploids, e.g. in \u003cem\u003eA. paniculatum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eA. marginatum\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB, see Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR229\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e for discussion), are similar to those of tetraploids of other species, despite the similarity of 2C values between the respective diploids (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB). Alternatively, some of such tetraploid cytotypes might represent allopolyploids, which originated by polyploidization of hybrids between diploid species with different 2C values. In \u003cem\u003eA. rupestre\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7), tetraploids had a higher 1Cx than triploids, but this may be related to the effect of dysploidy observed in this species (see above).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGS variation in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e may also be affected by phylogenetic signal (Wang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR235\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), suggesting that GS evolution may reflect phylogenetic relationships (e.g. Weiss-Schneeweiss et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR236\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e; Chrtek et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Hutang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR100\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Unfortunately, only a limited number of \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e members have been sequenced, which, together with the limited number of GS estimates available, currently precludes full reconstruction of GS evolution along the phylogeny. Two main clades [A, B] have been identified in the limited number of accessions of \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e analysed so far using ITS and/or the combined ITS and trnH-psbA dataset (Fig.\u0026nbsp;6 in Salmeri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR186\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e in Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR230\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Interestingly, when mapping the available 2C values of diploid members of both clades onto these phylogenetic trees, diploid species with larger genomes (2C\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;27 pg, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA) and smaller genomes (with 2C\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;25 pg) are recorded within the A and B clades (\u003cem\u003esensu\u003c/em\u003e Salmeri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR186\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e), respectively. Considering the monoploid GS, sequenced taxa with 1Cx\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;12 pg (e.g. \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eA. paniculatum\u003c/em\u003e) are placed in the A clade, whereas those with 1Cx\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;12 pg (e.g. \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eA. pallens\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eA. tenuiflorum\u003c/em\u003e) are included in the B clade. Any further consideration of the ancestral state and possible direction of GS evolution in the two main clades will require additional sequencing, as the current trees may be limited by incomplete taxon sampling.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntraspecific intra-ploidy variation in GS and its ecological and taxonomic consequences\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTraditionally considered to be a stable trait at the plant species level (Ohri \u003cspan citationid=\"CR146\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e), GS can actually exhibit significant intraspecific variability among individuals and populations (Šmarda and Bureš \u003cspan citationid=\"CR196\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). Published chromosome/karyotype reports suggest that the higher intra-ploidy GS variation found in some taxa (e.g. \u003cem\u003eA. flavu\u003c/em\u003em, Vujošević et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR232\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e) could be partly explained by changes at the chromosomal level via aneuploidy or the presence of accessory B chromosomes. However, supernumerary chromosomes have only a minor effect on individual GS, and even less on plants with higher GS (Levin et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR125\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e; Chumov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; but see Leitch et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR121\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e), which is the case in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e species.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe primary mechanism contributing to genome expansion is the proliferation of transposable elements within a given ploidy level (Feschotte and Pritham \u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Lisch \u003cspan citationid=\"CR129\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). On the other hand, losses in DNA content often result from unequal homologous recombination or illegitimate recombination events (Bennetzen 2005). Such observed variation may indicate the response of GS to environmental constraints along ecogeographic gradients (Knight et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR107\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e) or during the range expansion/invasion (Guo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e), accompanied by drift (Cang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Alternatively, intraspecific GS variation could reflect a complex evolutionary history of the taxon under study (Loureiro et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR132\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e) due to unrecognised phylogenetic components (Greilhuber \u003cspan citationid=\"CR80\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR81\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e). We recorded considerable intraspecific intra-ploidy GS variation for several taxa (e.g., \u003cem\u003eA. carinatum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eA. flavum\u003c/em\u003e, Table\u0026nbsp;1, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA,B), for which we gathered samples along substantial parts of their geographical range. Longitude, which can be considered a surrogate for the continental climate gradient in Europe (Mikolaskova \u003cspan citationid=\"CR139\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e) and a measure of the growing season and water availability (Berg et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e), appeared to be the most frequent factor correlated with GS in our dataset. However, we did not observe consistent relationships between GS variation and geography, both between taxa and between-ploidy within taxa, consistent with patterns previously observed in \u003cem\u003eA. oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e (Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). It can be conducted that the observed intraspecific intra-ploidy GS variation in the studied \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e taxa is likely to be complex and idiosyncratic to each taxon, probably reflecting phylogenetic heterogeneity (Rešetnik et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR175\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e), as well as past processes associated with range shifts during the Holocene, or survival in refugia where several lineages may have evolved in isolation (Nieto Feliner \u003cspan citationid=\"CR142\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Hor\u0026aacute;k et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR97\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Therefore, both selection and drift may have influenced the evolution of divergent GS in topographically complex and ecologically divergent landscapes (Griffiths et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR83\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e), such as the Balkan Peninsula (Španiel and Rešetnik \u003cspan citationid=\"CR199\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Similar results were previously obtained, for example, by Frajman et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR71\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) for representatives of \u003cem\u003eKnautia\u003c/em\u003e L. and Terlević et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR210\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) for \u003cem\u003eDianthus sylvestris\u003c/em\u003e Wulfen. Longitudinal gradients in GS observed within some widely distributed \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e taxa might also reflect westward migration in the past, as discussed above. Future studies should focus on these taxa to ascertain whether there is a strong correlation between intraspecific GS variation and phylogeny, and to determine whether any taxonomic conclusions can be drawn.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSimilarly, but at the interspecific level, Wang et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR235\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) found no significant relationship between GS and 19 bioclimatic variables in the 62 \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e species from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau in China. Also, Vesel\u0026yacute; et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR227\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e), analysing 219 European geophytic species, found no relationship between GS and Pignatti's indicators of continentality, moisture and temperature, with only a tendency for species with very high GS to avoid water-stressed environments. Indeed, in the \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e species we studied, taxa with very high GS (2C\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;40 pg, polyploids only) usually inhabit less stressful, often man-made habitats with higher nutrient availability (i.e. arable fields, vineyards, road ditches, moist grasslands, secondary forests; e.g. Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Duchoslav et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e, see discussion above), representing new niches for \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e polyploids (Hanelt \u003cspan citationid=\"CR90\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGS as an extra taxonomic character for species identification?\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFCM has repeatedly proven beneficial in biosystematic research (e.g. Zonneveld \u003cspan citationid=\"CR243\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e; Castro et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Lepš\u0026iacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR122\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Popelka et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR164\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Kobrlov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR108\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), and GS is considered an efficient tool for taxa discrimination, especially in morphologically challenging groups (e.g. Prančl et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR167\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Sochor et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR198\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). We have also found GS useful in combination with classical karyology within the \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e, despite the observed intrataxon variation in GS that we found for some species (see above). An illustrative example could be the morphologically similar triplet \u003cem\u003eA. tenuiflorum/A. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e/\u003cem\u003eA. pallens\u003c/em\u003e, where \u003cem\u003eA. tenuiflorum\u003c/em\u003e is the only diploid and the rest are polyploids, i.e. \u003cem\u003eA. dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e: 4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e, 5\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eA. pallens\u003c/em\u003e: 4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e. Despite the presence of the same ploidy level (4\u003cem\u003ex\u003c/em\u003e), these two latter species differ in AGS/RGS with no overlap (Table\u0026nbsp;1, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA). In our pilot screening, we also found a difference in GS between two often barely distinguishable related diploid species occurring in the same area, \u003cem\u003eA. karsianum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eA. kunthianum\u003c/em\u003e (Table\u0026nbsp;1). Moreover, FCM was also effective in distinguishing between closely related and morphologically very similar diploid species of the \u003cem\u003eA. paniculatum\u003c/em\u003e complex (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA, Table\u0026nbsp;1, see Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR229\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e for details). Furthermore, FCM could also be potentially promising for the revision of the \u003cem\u003eA. stamineum\u003c/em\u003e complex (\u003cem\u003esensu\u003c/em\u003e Brullo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e), as members measured by FCM differ in 1Cx values. As precise genetic identification is required for further taxonomic assessment of such complexes, FCM may facilitate their delimitation.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study showed the advantage of FCM for ploidy screening and estimation of GS in the \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e. Genome size should be used regularly as an extra taxonomic character that allow to differentiate between closely related taxa, could help to detect and/or resolve the taxonomic heterogeneity of some species groups within the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e and to identify poorly developed individuals (i.e., reduce misidentifications, see Salmeri et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR186\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR229\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). However, our population-based FCM data also clearly showed that there is an urgent need to cover as much of the geographic range of the taxa studied as possible in order to find out if variation in ploidy and GS is occurring and what the causes are. This will be of great value for future phylogenetic assessments of this taxonomically complex group.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNot applicable\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNot applicable\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and material\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe acknowledged several projects during which we had a possibility to sample wild \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e populations (Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, grant numbers 206/04/P115, 206/09/1126). Kateřina Vojtěchov\u0026aacute; was supported by internal grants from Palacky University (IGA_PrF_2023_001, 2024_001).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026apos; contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe design of the research was taken care by M.D. The performance of the research \u0026ndash; sampling was taken care by M.D. with a contribution of all authors. L.K., M.J. and L.\u0026Scaron;. \u0026nbsp;Data analysis was taken care by M.D. with a contribution of L.K. and K.V. The writing of the manuscript was taken care by M.D. and L.K. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe thank particularly the many sample contributors mentioned in the supplement (Table S1), namely Roman Kalous, Bohumil Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček, Michal Hrone\u0026scaron;, Martin Danč\u0026aacute;k, Alena Lep\u0026scaron;\u0026iacute;, Michal Sochor, Franti\u0026scaron;ek Krahulec, Radim Va\u0026scaron;ut, David Hor\u0026aacute;k, Ivan Moysiyenko, Vojtěch Tara\u0026scaron;ka, Jiř\u0026iacute; Ohryzek, Miloslav Kitner, and others. Without their enthusiasm and help, we will not be able to gather such a large collection. We would like to thank Alena Fi\u0026scaron;erov\u0026aacute; (V\u0026aacute;ňov\u0026aacute;) for providing us with data from her master\u0026apos;s thesis. We also thank Ori Fragman-Sapir (Botanical Garden Jerusalem, Israel) for his valuable advice on sampling in Israel. Salvatore Brullo (University of Catania, Italy), Dimitris Tzanoudakis (University of Patras, Greece) and Sandro Bogdanović (University of Zagreb, Croatia) are acknowledged for their consultations concerning the taxonomic identity of some populations sampled by us. Mihai Pușkaș (Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca) and Adam Kantor (Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava) are acknowledged for consultation on distribution of selected taxa in Romania and Slovakia, respectively.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003cp\u003eAedo C (2013) \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. In: Rico E, Crespo MB, Quintanar A, Herrero A, Aedo C (eds.) Flora Iberica, Vol. 20, Liliaceae-Agavaceae. Editorial CSIC, Madrid, pp. 220\u0026ndash;273.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfonso A, Loureiro J, Arroyo J, Olmedo-Vicente E, Castro S (2021) Cytogenetic diversity in the polyploid complex \u003cem\u003eLinum suffruticosum s.l\u003c/em\u003e. (Linaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 195:216\u0026ndash;232. doi:10.1093/botlinnean/boaa060\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlden B (1976) Floristic reports from the high mountains of Pindhos, Greece. Bot Not 129:297\u0026ndash;321.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnačkov G (2009) Taxonomy and chorology of genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. 1754 (Amaryllidales, Alliaceae) in Serbia. Dissertation, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndersson IA (1991) \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. In: Strid A, Tan K (eds.) Mountain Flora of Greece, 2. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 701\u0026ndash;714.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAssyov B, Petrova A, Dimitrov D, Vassilev R (2012) Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora. Distribution maps and floristic elements, ed. 4. Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation, Sofia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBabin CH, Bell CD (2022) Evolution of chromosome number in wild onions (\u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e, Amaryllidaceae). Syst Bot 47:335\u0026ndash;346. doi:10.1600/036364422X16512564801678\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBaranyi M, Greilhuber J (1999) Genome size in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e: In quest of reproducible data. Ann Bot 83:687\u0026ndash;695. doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.0871\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBarina Z, Pifk\u0026oacute; D (2011) Contributions to the flora of Albania, 2. Willdenowia 41:139\u0026ndash;149. doi:10.3372/wi.41.41118\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBartolucci F, Peruzzi L, Galasso G, et al (2024) A second update to the checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. Plant Biosyst 158:219\u0026ndash;296.doi:10.1080/11263504.2024.2320126\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBecher H, Powell RF, Brown MR, et al (2021) The nature of intraspecific and interspecific genome size variation in taxonomically complex eyebrights. Ann Bot 128:639\u0026ndash;651. doi:10.1093/aob/mcab102\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBennetzen JL, Ma J, Devos KM (2005) Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. Ann Bot 95: 127\u0026ndash;132. doi:10.1093/aob/mci008\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBerg C, Welk E, J\u0026auml;ger EJ (2017) Revising Ellenberg\u0026rsquo;s indicator values for continentality based on global vascular plant species distribution. Appl Veg Sci 20:482\u0026ndash;493. doi: 10.1111/avsc.12306\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBitomsk\u0026yacute; M, Kobrlov\u0026aacute; L, Hrone\u0026scaron; M et al (2022) Stoichiometry versus ecology: the relationships between genome size and guanine\u0026ndash;cytosine content, and tissue nitrogen and phosphorus in grassland herbs. Ann Bot 130:189\u0026ndash;197. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac079\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBitomsk\u0026yacute; M, Mart\u0026iacute;kov\u0026aacute; J, Lubbe FC et al (2023) Genome size is strongly linked to carbohydrate storage and weakly linked to root sprouting ability in herbs. Ann Bot 132:1021\u0026ndash;1032. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad158\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBlommaert J (2020) Genome size evolution: towards new model systems for old questions. Proc Royal Soc B. 287:20201441. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1441\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBogdanović S, Brullo S, Mitić B et al (2008) A new species of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Alliaceae) from Dalmatia, Croatia. Bot J Linn Soc 158:106\u0026ndash;114. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2008.00790.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBogdanović S, Brullo S, Giusso del Galdo G et al (2009) A new autumn-flowering species of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e (Alliaceae) from Croatia. Folia Geobot 44:83\u0026ndash;93. doi: 10.1007/s12224-009-9032-2\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBogdanović S, Brullo C, Brullo et al (2011) \u003cem\u003eAllium achaium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eBoiss. (Alliaceae), a critical species of Greek flora. Candollea 66:57\u0026ndash;64. doi: 10.15553/c2011v661a3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eB\u0026ouml;sen H, Nagl W (1978) Short duration of the mitotic and endomitotic cell cycle in the heterochromatin-rich monocot \u003cem\u003eAllium carinatum\u003c/em\u003e. Cell Biol Int Rep 2:565\u0026ndash;571. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(78)90065-6\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBourge M, Brown SC, Siljak-Yakovlev S (2018) Flow cytometry as tool in plant sciences, with emphasis on genome size and ploidy level assessment. Genetics \u0026amp; Applications 2:1\u0026ndash;12. doi: 10.31383/ga.vol2iss2pp1-12.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBressler S, Klatte-Asselmeyer V, Fischer A et al (2017) Variation in genome size in the \u003cem\u003eValeriana officinalis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ecomplex resulting from multiple chromosomal evolutionary processes. Preslia 89:41\u0026ndash;61. doi: 10.23855/preslia.2017.041\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Guarino R (2017) \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. \u0026ndash; Aglio. In: Pignatti S (ed) Flora d\u0026rsquo;Italia, ed. 2. Edagricole di New Business Media, Bologna, pp 238\u0026ndash;269.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Guglielmo A, Pavone P et al (2003) Cytotaxonomical remarks on \u003cem\u003eAllium pallens\u003c/em\u003e and its relationships with \u003cem\u003eA. convallarioides\u003c/em\u003e (Alliaceae). Bocconea 16:557\u0026ndash;571.:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Guglielmo A, Pavone P et al (2007) Cytotaxonomic considerations on \u003cem\u003eAllium stamineum\u003c/em\u003e Boiss. group (Alliaceae). Bocconea 21:325\u0026ndash;343.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Guglielmo A, Pavone P (2008) Taxonomical remarks on \u003cem\u003eAllium dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e and its relationships with allied species. Taxon 57:243\u0026ndash;253. doi: 10.2307/25065965\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Guglielmo A, Terrasi MC (1998) Notes on \u003cem\u003eAllium rhodopeum\u003c/em\u003e (Alliaceae), a neglected species from the E Mediterranean area. Plant Biosyst 132:63\u0026ndash;69. doi: 10.1080/11263504.1998.10654192\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (1991) Cytotaxonomical notes on \u003cem\u003eAllium dentiferum\u003c/em\u003e Webb \u0026amp; Berthelot, an unknown species of the Mediterranean flora. Bot Chronica 10:785\u0026ndash;796.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (1996a) \u003cem\u003eAllium daninianum\u003c/em\u003e (Alliaceae), a new species from the Middle East. Wildenowia 26:237\u0026ndash;244. doi: 10.3372/wi.26.2610\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (1996b) A new species of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e from Sierra Nevada (Spain). Sendtnera 3:95\u0026ndash;100.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (1997a) \u003cem\u003eAllium oporinanthum\u003c/em\u003e (Alliaceae), a new species from the NW Mediterranean area. Anales Jard Bot Madrid 55:297\u0026ndash;302. doi:10.3989/ajbm.1997.v55.i2.276\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (1997b) Specie a fioritura tardiva del gruppo di \u003cem\u003eAllium paniculatum\u003c/em\u003e nell\u0026prime; area mediterranea. Inform Bot Ital 29:300\u0026ndash;302.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (2013) \u003cem\u003eAllium aetnense\u003c/em\u003e (Amaryllidaceae), a new species from Sicily. Plant Biosyst 147:835\u0026ndash;843. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2013.832433\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrullo S, Pavone P, Salmeri C (2015) Biosystematic researches on \u003cem\u003eAllium cupani\u003c/em\u003e group (Amaryllidaceae) in the Mediterranean area. Fl Medit 25:209\u0026ndash;244. doi:10.7320/FlMedit25SI.209\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCang FA, Welles SR, Wong J et al (2024) Genome size variation and evolution during invasive range expansion in an introduced plant. Evol Appl 1:e13624. doi: 10.1111/eva.13624\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCarta A, Bedini G, Peruzzi L (2020) A deep dive into the ancestral chromosome number and genome size of flowering plants. New Phytol 228:1097\u0026ndash;1106. doi: 10.1111/nph.16668\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCastro M, Castro S, Loureiro J (2012) Genome size variation and incidence of polyploidy in Scrophulariaceae sensu lato from the Iberian Peninsula. AoB PLANTS 2012:pls037. doi:10.1093/aobpla/pls037\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eČertner M, Fenclov\u0026aacute; E, K\u0026uacute;r P et al (2017) Evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations in an annual herb: dispersal, local persistence and recurrent origins of polyploids. Ann Bot 120:303\u0026ndash;315. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx032\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eČertner M, Rydlo J, Dud\u0026aacute;\u0026scaron; M et al (2022) A unique diploid \u0026ndash; triploid contact zone provides insights into the evolutionary mechanisms of cytotype coexistence in flowering rush (\u003cem\u003eButomus umbellatus\u003c/em\u003e). Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 54:125659. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2022.125659\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChase MW, Reveal JL, Fay MF (2009) A subfamilial classification for the expanded asparagalean families Amaryllidaceae, Asparagaceae and Xanthorrhoeaceae. Bot J Linn Soc 161:132\u0026ndash;136. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00999.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev IV (1970) A contribution to the cytosystematics of certain species of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e L. from the flora of Bulgaria. Bot Zhurn 55:1100\u0026ndash;1110.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev IV (1971) Cytosystematic study of some species from genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. and \u003cem\u003eNectaroscordum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eLindl. Bot Zhurn 56:1644\u0026ndash;1657.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev IV (1973) To the cytotaxonomy of some Bulgarian \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e L. species. Bot Zhurn 58:864\u0026ndash;875.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev IV (1975a) On chromosome polymorphism in some \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003especies. Genet Selekts 8:184\u0026ndash;191.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev IV (1975b) Cytotaxonomic investigation of some onion species from the \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eReichenb. section. In: Velchev V et al (eds) In honor Acad. Daki Jordanov. Publishing House Bulg. Acad. Sci., Sofia, pp. 79\u0026ndash;89.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev IV (1975c) Cytotaxonomic studies of several species of onion from section \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eReichenb. C R Acad Bulg Sci 28:795\u0026ndash;798.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev IV (1976) Reports by I.V. Cheshmedzhiev. In: L\u0026ouml;ve \u0026Aacute; (ed) IOPB Chromosome Number Reports LIV. Taxon 25:442\u0026ndash;444.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev IV (1977) B-chromosomes in species of the \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003egenus. Dokl Bulg Akad Nauk 30:435-437.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev IV (1979) Karyosystematic investigations on species of the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. in Bulgaria. Fitologija 11:40\u0026ndash;46.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev IV (1982) Cytotaxonomic study of \u003cem\u003eAllium flavum\u003c/em\u003e L. and \u003cem\u003eAllium paczoskianum\u003c/em\u003e Tuzson. Nauchni Trudove Selskost Inst Vasil Kolarov 27:11\u0026ndash;23.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev I (1992) \u003cem\u003eAllium melanantherum\u003c/em\u003e complex in Bulgaria. In: Hanelt P, Hammer K, Kn\u0026uuml;pffer H (eds) The Genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e \u0026ndash; Taxonomic Problems and Genetic Resources. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Gatersleben: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, pp. 21\u0026ndash;26.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev IV (1994) Reports (313-366) by I.V. Cheshmedzhiev. In: Kamari G, Felber F, Garbari F (ed) Mediterranean chromosome number reports - 4. Fl Medit 4:233\u0026ndash;301.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheshmedzhiev I (2011) Alliaceae. In: Delipavlov D, Cheshmedzhiev I (eds) Opredelitel na rasteniyata v Bulgariya. Akademichno izdatelstvo na Agrarnija universitet, Plovdiv, pp. 447\u0026ndash;452.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChrtek J. Jr., Zahradn\u0026iacute;ček J, Krak J et al (2009) Genome size in \u003cem\u003eHieracium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003esubgenus \u003cem\u003eHieracium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Asteraceae) is strongly correlated with major phylogenetic groups. Ann Bot 104:161\u0026ndash;178. doi:10.1093/aob/mcp107\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChumov\u0026aacute; Z, Mand\u0026aacute;kov\u0026aacute; T, Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček P (2016) Are B-chromosomes responsible for the extraordinary genome size variation in selected \u003cem\u003eAnthoxanthum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eannuals? Pl Syst Evol 302:731\u0026ndash;738. doi:10.1007/s00606-016-1295-5\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCioc\u0026acirc;rlan V (2000) Flora ilustrată a Rom\u0026acirc;niei. Editura Ceres, Bucureşti.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCosta L, Jimenez H, Carvalho R et al (2020) Divide to conquer: Evolutionary history of Allioideae tribes (Amaryllidaceae) is linked to distinct trends of karyotype evolution. Front Plant Sc. 11:320.doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00320\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDanin A, Fragman-Sapir O (2016+) Flora of Israel and adjacent areas.\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://flora.org.il/en/plants/\"\u003ehttps://flora.org.il/en/plants/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDimopoulos P, Raus T, Strid A (ed) (2023) Flora of Greece web. Vascular plants of Greece. An annotated checklist. Version V (November 2023).\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://portal.cybertaxonomy.org/flora-greece/\"\u003ehttps://portal.cybertaxonomy.org/flora-greece/\u003c/a\u003e [accessed June 2024].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDobignard D, Chatelain C (2010) Index synonymique de la flore d\u0026apos;Afrique du nord 1. \u0026Eacute;ditions des conservatoire et jardin botaniques, Gen\u0026egrave;ve, 455 pp.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDobrochaeva DN, Kotov MI, Prokudin YN (eds) (1999) Key to the higher plants of Ukraine. Fitosociocentr, Kyiv.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoležel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S et al (1998) Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: Inter-laboratory comparison. Ann Bot 82 (Suppl. A):17\u0026ndash;26. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010312\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (2007) Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2:2233\u0026ndash;2244. doi: 0.1038/nprot.2007.310\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuchoslav M, Jandov\u0026aacute; M, Kobrlov\u0026aacute; L et al (2020) Intricate distribution patterns of six cytotypes of \u003cem\u003eAllium oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e at a continental scale: Niche expansion and innovation followed by niche contraction with increasing ploidy level. Front Plant Sci 11:591137. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.591137\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuchoslav M, \u0026Scaron;af\u0026aacute;řov\u0026aacute; L, Jandov\u0026aacute; M (2013) Role of adaptive and non-adaptive mechanisms forming complex patterns of genome size variation in six cytotypes of polyploid \u003cem\u003eAllium oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e (Amaryllidaceae) on a continental scale. Ann Bot 111:419\u0026ndash;431. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs297\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuchoslav M, \u0026Scaron;af\u0026aacute;řov\u0026aacute; L, Krahulec F (2010) Complex distribution patterns, ecology and coexistence of ploidy levels of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eoleraceum\u003c/em\u003e (Alliaceae) in the Czech Republic. Ann Bot 105:719\u0026ndash;735. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq035\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEkrt L, Holubov\u0026aacute; R, Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček P et al (2010) Species boundaries and frequency of hybridization in the D\u003cem\u003eryopteris carthusiana\u003c/em\u003e (Dryopteridaceae) complex: A taxonomic puzzle resolved using genome size data. Am J Bot 97:1208\u0026ndash;1219. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900206\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFernandes A, Quieros M (1971) Sur la caryologie de quelque plantes recoltees pendant la Illeme reunion de botanique peninsulaire. Mem Soc Broteriana 21:343\u0026ndash;385.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFeschotte C, Pritham EJ (2007) DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Annu Rev Genet 41:331\u0026ndash;368.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFialov\u0026aacute; M, Duchoslav M (2014) Response to competition of bulbous geophyte \u003cem\u003eAllium oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e differing in ploidy level. Plant Biol 16:186-96. doi: 10.1111/plb.12042\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFrajman B, Re\u0026scaron;etnik I, Weiss-Schneeweiss H et al (2015) Cytotype diversity and genome size variation in \u003cem\u003eKnautia\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacoideae). BMC Evol Biol 15:140. doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0425-y\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFriesen N (1992) Systematics of the Siberian polyploid complex in subgenus \u003cem\u003eRhizirideum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(\u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e). In: Hanelt P, Hammer K, Kn\u0026uuml;pffer H (eds) The genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e: taxonomic problems and genetic resources. Proceedings of an international symposium held at Gatersleben, Germany, 11-13 Jun 1991. Institut f\u0026uuml;r Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung, Gatersleben, pp. 55\u0026ndash;66.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFriesen N, Fritsch RM, Blattner FR (2006) Phylogeny and new intrageneric classification of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Alliaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences. Aliso 22:372\u0026ndash;395. doi:10.5642/aliso.20062201.31\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFritsch RM, Blattner FR, Gurushidze M (2010) New classification of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. subg. \u003cem\u003eMelanocrommyum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Webb \u0026amp; Berthel.) Rouy (Alliaceae) based on molecular and morphological characters. Phyton (Horn) 49:145\u0026ndash;220. doi:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFritsch RM, Friesen N (2002) Evolution, domestication and taxonomy. In: Rabinowitch HD, Currah L (eds) \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ecrop science: recent advances. CABI publishing, Wallingford, pp. 5\u0026ndash;30.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGagnidze R, Gviniashvili T, Danelia I, Tedoradze G. (2015) Reports by Gagnidze et al. In: Marhold K, Breitwieser I (eds) IAPT/IOPB chromosome data 19. Taxon 64:1068-1074. doi:10.12705/645.34\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGarcia-Castellanos D, Estrada F, Jim\u0026eacute;nez-Munt I et al (2009) Catastrophic flood of the Mediterranean after the Messinian salinity crisis. Nature 462:778\u0026ndash;781. doi:10.1038/nature08555\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGeitler L, Tschermak-Woess E (1962) Chromosomale Variation, strukturelle Hybridit\u0026auml;t und ihre Folgen bei \u003cem\u003eAllium carinatum\u003c/em\u003e. \u0026Ouml;sterr Bot Z 109:150\u0026ndash;167. doi:10.1007/BF01289615\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGoldblatt P, Lowry PP (2011) The Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers (IPCN): three decades of publication by the Missouri Botanical Garden come to an end. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 98:226\u0026ndash;227. doi:10.3417/2011027\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreilhuber J (1998) Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size: A Critical Reassessment. Ann Bot 82:27\u0026ndash;35. doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0725\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreilhuber J (2005) Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size in Angiosperms: Identifying its Existence. Ann Bot 95:91\u0026ndash;98. doi:10.1093/aob/mci004\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreilhuber J, Doležel J, Lys\u0026aacute;k MA et al (2005) The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms \u0026lsquo;genome size\u0026rsquo; and \u0026lsquo;C-value\u0026rsquo; to describe nuclearDNA contents. Ann Bot 95:255\u0026ndash;260. doi:10.1093/aob/mci019\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGriffiths HI, Krystufek B, Reed JM (eds) (2004) Balkan Biodiversity. Pattern and Process in the European Hotspot. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGuerra M (2008) Chromosome numbers in plant cytotaxonomy: concepts and implications. Cytogenet Genome Res 120:339\u0026ndash;350. doi:10.1159/000121083\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGuerra M (2012) Cytotaxonomy: The end of childhood. Plant Biosyst 146:703\u0026ndash;710. doi:10.1080/11263504.2012.717973\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGuo K, Py\u0026scaron;ek P, van Kleunen M et al (2024) Plant invasion and naturalization are influenced by genome size, ecology and economic use globally. Nat Commun 15:1330. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45667-4\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGurushidze M, Fuchs J, Blattner FR (2012) The evolution of genome size variation in Drumstick Onions (\u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e subgenus \u003cem\u003eMelanocrommyum\u003c/em\u003e). Syst Bot 37:96\u0026ndash;104. doi:10.1600/036364412X616675\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHajrudinović A, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Brown SC et al (2015) When sexual meets apomict: genome size, ploidy level and reproductive mode variation of Sorbus aria s.l. and S. austriaca (Rosaceae) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ann Bot 116:301\u0026ndash;312. doi:10.1093/aob/mcv093\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHan TS, Zheng QJ, Onstein RE et al (2020) Polyploidy promotes species diversification of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ethrough ecological shifts. New Phytol 225:571\u0026ndash;583. doi:10.1111/nph.16098\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHanelt P (1996) Taxonomic problems in Mediterranean \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e and relationships with non-Mediterranean \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e groups. Bocconea 5:259\u0026ndash;265.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHanelt P, Schultze-Motel J, Fritsch R et al (1992) Infrageneric grouping of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e \u0026ndash; the Gatersleben approach. In: Hanelt P, Hammer K, Kn\u0026uuml;pffer H (eds) The Genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e \u0026ndash; Taxonomic Problems and Genetic Resources. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Gatersleben: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, pp. 107\u0026ndash;123.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHardie DC, Gregory TR, Hebert PDN (2002) From pixels to picograms: A beginners\u0026rsquo; guide to genome quantification by Feulgen image analysis densitometry. J Histochem Cytochem 50:735\u0026ndash;749. doi:10.1177/002215540205000601\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHauenschild F, Favre A, Schnitzler J et al (2017) Spatio-temporal evolution of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. in the Qinghai\u0026ndash;Tibet-Plateau region: Immigration and in situ radiation. Pl Diversity 39:167\u0026ndash;179. doi:10.1016/j.pld.2017.05.010\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHerben T, Suda J, Klime\u0026scaron;ov\u0026aacute; J (2017) Polyploid species rely on vegetative reproduction more than diploids: a re-examination of the old hypothesis. Ann Bot\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e120:341\u0026ndash;349. doi:10.1093/aob/mcx009\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHewitt GM (1999) Postglacial recolonization of European biota. Biol J Linn Soc\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e68:87\u0026ndash;112. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01160.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHolmes DS, Bougourd SM (1989) B-chromosome selection in \u003cem\u003eAllium schoenoprasum\u003c/em\u003e. I. Natural populations. Heredity 63:83\u0026ndash;87. doi:10.1038/hdy.1989.78\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHor\u0026aacute;k D, Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček B, Kir\u0026aacute;ly G et al (2023) Cytogeography of \u003cem\u003eGagea bohemica\u003c/em\u003e (Liliaceae) outside the Mediterranean: two ploidy levels, spatial differentiation of cytotypes, and occurrence of mixed-ploidy populations. Pl Syst Evol 309:37. doi:10.1007/s00606-023-01877-9\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eH\u0026ouml;randl E (2009) A combinational theory for maintenance of sex. Heredity 103:445\u0026ndash;457. doi:10.1038/hdy.2009.85\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHughes PD, Woodward JC (2017) Quaternary glaciation in the Mediterranean mountains: a new synthesis. In: Hughes PD, Woodward JC (eds) Quaternary Glaciation in the Mediterranean Mountains. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 433, pp. 1\u0026ndash;23.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHutang GR, Tong Y, Zhu XG et al (2023) Genome size variation and polyploidy prevalence in the genus \u003cem\u003eEragrostis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eare associated with the global dispersal in arid area. Front Plant Sci 14:1066925. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1066925\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJauzein P, Tison JM (2001) \u0026Eacute;tude analytique du genre \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL., sous-genre \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Reichenb.) Zahar., section \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eReichenb., en France. J Bot Soc Bot France 15:29\u0026ndash;50.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJauzein P, Tison JM, Desch\u0026acirc;tres R et al (2002) \u003cem\u003eAllium corsicum\u003c/em\u003e Jauzein, J.-M. Tison, Desch\u0026acirc;tres \u0026amp; H. Couderc spec. nova, espece m\u0026eacute;connue de la flore corse. Candollea 5:301\u0026ndash;314.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJohnson MAT, Brandham PE (1997) New chromosome numbers in petaloid monocotyledons and in other miscellaneous Angiosperms. Kew Bull 52:121\u0026ndash;138.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJones RN, Rees H (1968) Nuclear DNA variation in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e. Heredity 23:591\u0026ndash;605. doi:10.1038/hdy.1987.103\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKalpoutzakis E, Trigas P, Constantinidis T (2012) \u003cem\u003eAllium orestis\u003c/em\u003e sp. nov. (Amaryllidaceae) from Parnon and Taigetos mountains, south Peloponnisos, Greece. Nord J Bot 30:195\u0026ndash;200. doi:10.1111/j.1756-1051.2011.01490.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKaravokyrou E, Tzanoudakis D (1991) The genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ein Greece: II. A cytogeographical study of the E Aegean species. Bot Chron 10:777\u0026ndash;784.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKnight CA, Molinari NA, Petrov DA (2005) The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype. Ann Bot 95:177\u0026ndash;190. doi:10.1093/aob/mci011\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKobrlov\u0026aacute; L, Duchoslav M, Hrone\u0026scaron; M (2022) Morphological, ecological and geographic differences between diploids and tetraploids of \u003cem\u003eSymphytum officinale\u003c/em\u003e (Boraginaceae) justify both cytotypes as separate species. AoB PLANTS 14:plac028. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plac028\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKobrlov\u0026aacute; L, Hrone\u0026scaron; M, Kouteck\u0026yacute; P et al (2016) \u003cem\u003eSymphytum tuberosum\u003c/em\u003e complex in central Europe: cytogeography, morphology, ecology and taxonomy. Preslia 88:77\u0026ndash;112.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKo\u0026ccedil;yiğit M, \u0026Ouml;zhatay N (2011) Taxonomic remarks on eight \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003especies (sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e) from south Anatolia. J Fac Pharm Istanbul 41:42\u0026ndash;55.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKol\u0026aacute;ř F, Čertner M, Suda J et al (2017) Mixed-ploidy species: progress and opportunities in polyploid research. Trends Plant. Sci. 22:1041\u0026ndash;1055. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.011\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKollmann F (1984) \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e. In: Davis PH (ed) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Volume 8. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 98\u0026ndash;211.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKollmann F (1985) The genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ein Israel. Rotem, 15. Jerusalem.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKollmann F, Shmida A (1977) \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003especies of Mt. Hermon. I. Taxonomy. Israel J Bot 26:128\u0026minus;148.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKrijgsman W, Hilgen F, Raffi I et al (99) Chronology, causes and progression of the Messinian salinity crisis. Nature 400:652\u0026ndash;655. doi:10.1038/23231\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eK\u0026uacute;r P, Gregor T, Jandov\u0026aacute; M et al (2023) Cryptic invasion suggested by a cytogeographic analysis of the halophytic \u003cem\u003ePuccinellia distans\u003c/em\u003e complex (Poaceae) in Central Europe. Front Plant Sci 14:1249292. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1249292\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLabani RM, Elkington TT (1987) Nuclear DNA variation in the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e L. (Liliaceae). Heredity 59:119\u0026ndash;128. doi:10.1038/hdy.1987.103\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLeitch IJ, Bennett MD (2004) Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol J Linn Soc 82:651\u0026ndash;663. doi10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00349.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLeitch IJ, Chase MW, Bennett MD (1998) Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Ann Bot 82:85\u0026ndash;94. doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0783\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLeitch IJ, Johnston E, Pellicer J et al (2019) Plant DNA C-values Database \u0026ndash; Release 7.1. Kew (UK): The Royal Botanic Gardens [updated 2019 April].\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://cvalues.science.kew.org/\"\u003ehttps://cvalues.science.kew.org/\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLeitch IJ, Kahandawala I, Suda J et al (2009) Genome diversity in orchids: consequences and evolution. Ann Bot 104:469\u0026ndash;481. doi:10.1093/aob/mcp003\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLep\u0026scaron;\u0026iacute; M, Lep\u0026scaron;\u0026iacute; P, Kouteck\u0026yacute; P et al (2019) \u003cem\u003eStellaria ruderalis\u003c/em\u003e, a new species in the \u003cem\u003eStellaria media\u003c/em\u003e group from central Europe. Preslia 91:391\u0026ndash;420. doi:10.23855/preslia.2019.391\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLevan A (1931) Cytological studies in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e. A preliminary note. Hereditas 15:347\u0026ndash;356. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1931.tb02557.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLevan A (1933) Cytological studies in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e. III. \u003cem\u003eAllium carinatum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAllium oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e. Hereditas 18:101\u0026ndash;114. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1933.tb02602.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLevin DA, Palestis BG, Jones RN et al (2005) Phyletic hot spots for B chromosomes in Angiosperms. Evolution 59:962\u0026ndash;969. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01035.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLi QQ, Zhou SD, He XJ et al (2010) Phylogeny and biogeography of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Amaryllidaceae: Allieae) based on nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer and chloroplast rps16 sequences, focusing on the inclusion of species endemic to China. Ann Bot 106:709\u0026ndash;733. doi:10.1093/aob/mcq177\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLi QQ, Zhou SD, Huang DQ et al (2016) Molecular phylogeny, divergence time estimates and historical biogeography within one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest monocot genera. AoB PLANTS 8:plw041. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plw041\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLillie RD (1951) Simplification of the manufacture of Schiff reagent for use in histochemical procedures. Stain Technol 26:163\u0026ndash;165.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLisch D (2013) How important are transposons for plant evolution? Nat Rev Genet 14:49\u0026ndash;61.doi:10.1038/nrg3374\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiveri E, Katopodi E, Kamari G (2019) Karyosystematic study of some taxa from the Ionian floristic region (Greece). II. Fl Medit 29:308\u0026ndash;320. doi:10.7320/FlMedit29.308\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLoureiro J, Čertner M, Lučanov\u0026aacute; M et al (2023) The use of flow cytometry for estimating genome sizes and DNA ploidy levels in plants. In: Heitkam T, Garcia S (eds) Plant Cytogenetics and Cytogenomics. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 2672. Humana, New York, pp. 25\u0026ndash;64.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLoureiro J, Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček P, Rauchov\u0026aacute; J et al (2010) The use of flow cytometry in the biosystematics, ecology and population biology of homoploid plants. Preslia 82:3\u0026ndash;21.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMagulaev AY (1992) Chromosome numbers in some species of vascular plants of the northern Caucasus flora. Bot Zhurn 77:88\u0026ndash;90.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMand\u0026aacute;kov\u0026aacute; T, Lys\u0026aacute;k MA (2018) Post-polyploid diploidization and diversification through dysploid changes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 42:55\u0026ndash;65. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2018.03.001\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMarcucci R, Tornadore N (1994) Cariologia di alcuni popolamenti di \u003cem\u003eAllium tenuiflorum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eTen. provenienti dal Cilento (Italia meridionale). Giorn Bot Ital 12:252.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGagnidze R, Gviniashvili T, MukbaJinjolianiani M et al (2015) Reports by Gagnidze, R., Gviniashvili, T., Mukbaniani, M. \u0026amp; Jinjolia, L. In: Marhold K (ed) IAPT/IOPB chromosome data 19. Taxon 64:1068\u0026ndash;1074. doi:10.12705/645.34\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMayrose I, Lys\u0026aacute;k MA (2020) The evolution of chromosome numbers: mechanistic models and experimental approaches. Genome Biol Evol 13:evaa220. doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa220\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMathew B (1996) A review of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003esection \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMikolaskova K (2009) Continental and oceanic precipitation r\u0026eacute;gime in Europe. Cent Eur J Geosci 1:176\u0026ndash;182. doi:10.2478/v10085-009-0013-8\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMr\u0026aacute;z P, \u0026Scaron;ingliarov\u0026aacute; B, Urfus T et al (2008) Cytogeography of \u003cem\u003ePilosella officinarum\u003c/em\u003e (Compositae): Altitudinal and Longitudinal Differences in Ploidy Level Distribution in the Czech Republic and Slovakia and the General Pattern in Europe. Ann Bot 101:59\u0026ndash;71. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm282\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNagl W, Fusenig HP (1979) Types of chromatin organization in plant nuclei. In: Nagl W, Hemleben V, Ehrendorfer F (eds) Genome and Chromatin: Organization, Evolution, Function. Plant Systematics and Evolution. Vol. 2. Springer, Vienna, pp. 221\u0026ndash;233.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNieto Feliner G (2014) Patterns and processes in plant phylogeography in the Mediterranean Basin. A review. Perspect Pl Ecol Evol Syst 16:265\u0026ndash;278. doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2014.07.002\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikolov Z (2021) Contribution to the knowledge of the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Alliaceae) in the flora of the Republic of North Macedonia. Acta Mus Maced Sci Nat 24:55\u0026ndash;64.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNoroozi J, Zare G, Sherafati M et al (2019) Patterns of Endemism in Turkey, the Meeting Point of Three Global Biodiversity Hotspots, Based on Three Diverse Families of Vascular Plants. Front Ecol Evol 7:159. doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00159\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOganesian ME, Agababian MV (2001) Sem. 3 Alliaceae, Lukovye. In: Takhtajan AL (ed) Flora Armenii. Tom 10 Monocotyledones. Gantner, Ruggell, pp. 280\u0026ndash;348.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOhri O (1998) Genome Size Variation and Plant Systematics. Ann Bot 82:75\u0026ndash;83. doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0765\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOhri D, Fritsch RM, Hanelt P (1998) Evolution of genome size in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Alliaceae). Pl Syst Evol 210:57\u0026ndash;86. doi:10.1007/BF00984728\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOhri D, Pistrick K (2001) Phenology and genome size variation in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e L. - a tight correlation? Plant Biol 3:654\u0026ndash;660. doi:10.1055/s-2001-19362\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026Ouml;zhatay N (1990) The genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e in European Turkey and around Istanbul. Ann Mus Goulandris 8:115\u0026ndash;128.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026Ouml;zhatay N (1993)\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;Allium\u003c/em\u003e in Turkey: distribution, diversity, endemism and chromosome number. In: Demiriz H, \u0026Ouml;zhatay N (ed) 5th OPTIMA Meeting; 1986 Sep 8-15, Istanbul University Press, Istanbul, pp. 247\u0026ndash;271.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026Ouml;zhatay N, Ko\u0026ccedil;yiğit M (2019) A checklist of Turkish species, with taxonomic assessments: \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003esect. \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e, sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eand sect. \u003cem\u003eScorodon\u003c/em\u003e. Bot Chron 22:73\u0026ndash;85.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026Ouml;zhatay N, Ko\u0026ccedil;yiğit M, Brullo S et al (2018) \u003cem\u003eAllium istanbulense\u003c/em\u003e, a new autumnal species of \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Amaryllidaceae) from Turkey and its taxonomic position among allied species. Phytotaxa 334:152-166. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.334.2.5\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOzkan H, Tuna M, Arumuganathan K (2003) Nonadditive changes in genome size during allopolyploidization in the wheat (\u003cem\u003eAegilops\u003c/em\u003e-\u003cem\u003eTriticum\u003c/em\u003e) group. J Hered 94:260\u0026ndash;264. doi:10.1093/jhered/esg053\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePapanicolaou K (1984) Reports by Papanicolaou K. In: L\u0026ouml;ve \u0026Aacute; (ed) Chromosome Number Reports LXXXII. Taxon 33:126\u0026ndash;134. doi:10.1002/j.1996-8175.1984.tb02474.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePastor J (1982) Karyology of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003especies from the Iberian Peninsula. Phyton (Horn) 22:171\u0026ndash;200.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePellicer J, Leitch IJ (2020) The Plant DNA C-values database (release 7.1): an updated online repository of plant genome size data for comparative studies. New Phytol 226:301\u0026ndash;305. doi:10.1111/nph.16261\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePeruzzi L (2003) Numeri cromosomici per la Flora Italiana 1415-1420. Inform Bot Ital 35:81-84.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePeruzzi L (2007) \u003cem\u003eAllium garbarii\u003c/em\u003e (Alliaceae), a new species endemic to Calabria (S Italy). Candollea 62:17\u0026ndash;25.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePeruzzi L, Carta A, Altinordu F (2017) Chromosome diversity and evolution in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e (Allioideae, Amaryllidaceae). Plant Biosyst 151:212\u0026ndash;220. doi:10.1080/11263504.2016.1149123\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePeruzzi L, Domina G, Bartolucci F et al (2015) An inventory of the names of vascular plants endemic to Italy, their loci classici and types. Phytotaxa 196:30. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.410.1.1\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePoggio L, Realini MF, Fourasti\u0026eacute; MF et al (2014) Genome downsizing and karyotype constancy in diploid and polyploid congeners: a model of genome size variation. AoB PLANTS 6:plu029. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plu029\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePogosian AI (1983) Chromosome numbers of some species of the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Alliaceae) distributed in Armenia and Iran. Bot Zhurn 68:652\u0026ndash;660.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePogosian AI (1990) Reports by A.I. Pogosian. In: Agapova ND, Zakharova KB, Vakhtina LI et al Numeri chromosomatum Magnoliophytorum florae URSS. Aceraceae\u0026ndash;Menyantaceae. Nauka, Lenigrad, p. 32.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePopelka O, Sochor M, Duchoslav M (2019) Reciprocal hybridization between diploid \u003cem\u003eFicaria\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003ecalthifolia\u003c/em\u003e and tetraploid \u003cem\u003eFicaria verna\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003everna\u003c/em\u003e: evidence from experimental crossing, genome size and molecular markers. Bot J Linn Soc 189:293\u0026ndash;310. doi:10.1093/botlinnean/boy085\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePOWO (2024) Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the Internet. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/. Accessed 10 June 2024.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrančl J, Kaplan Z, Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček P et al (2014) Genome size as a key to evolutionary complex aquatic plants: polyploidy and hybridization in \u003cem\u003eCallitriche\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Plantaginaceae). PLoS ONE 9:e105997. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105997\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrančl J, Kouteck\u0026yacute; P, Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček P et al (2018) Cytotype variation, cryptic diversity and hybridization in \u003cem\u003eRanunculus\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eBatrachium\u003c/em\u003e revealed by flow cytometry and chromosome numbers. Preslia 90:195\u0026ndash;223. doi:10.23855/preslia.2018.195\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePuizina J, Jelisavac M, \u0026nbsp;\u0026Scaron;olić ME et al (1997) B-chromosomes in the population of \u003cem\u003eAllium pallens\u003c/em\u003e ssp. \u003cem\u003etenuiflorum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom the region of Makarska. Period Biol 99:129\u0026ndash;134.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePungar\u0026scaron;ek \u0026Scaron;, Frajman B (2024) Influence of polyploidy on morphology and distribution of the Cypress Spurge (\u003cem\u003eEuphorbia cyparissias\u003c/em\u003e, Euphorbiaceae). Plant Biol https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13685\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRabinowitch HD, Currah L (eds) (2002) \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e crop science: recent advances. CAB Int., Wallington, UK.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRamsey J, Schemske DW (1998) Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e29:467\u0026ndash;501. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRamsey J, Schemske DW (2002) Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e33:589\u0026ndash;639. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150437\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRedout\u0026eacute; PJ (1811) Les Liliac\u0026eacute;es. Volume VI. Paris.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRejlov\u0026aacute; L, Chrtek J, Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček P et al (2019) Polyploid evolution: The ultimate way to grasp the nettle. PLoS ONE 14:e0218389. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218389\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRe\u0026scaron;etnik I, Frajman B, Bogdanović S et al (2014) Disentangling relationships among the diploid members of the intricate genus \u003cem\u003eKnautia\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacoideae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 74:97\u0026ndash;110. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.01.028\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRey C, Rey S, Kaplan K et al (2015) \u003cem\u003eAllium oporinanthum\u003c/em\u003e Brullo, Pavone \u0026amp; Salmeri, new species for the Aoste Valley and for Italy. Rev Vald\u0026ocirc;taine Hist Nat 69:21\u0026ndash;40.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRicci I (1965) Ricerche citotassonomiche su alcune specie di Allium. Ann Bo. (Roma) 28:351\u0026ndash;363.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRice A, Glick L, Abadi S et al (2015) The Chromosome Counts Database (CCDB) \u0026ndash; a community resource of plant chromosome numbers. New Phytol 206:19\u0026ndash;26. doi:10.1111/nph.13191\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRice A, \u0026Scaron;marda P, Novosolov M et al (2019) The global biogeography of polyploid plants. Nat Ecol Evol 3:265\u0026ndash;273. doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0787-9\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRoddy AB, Th\u0026eacute;roux-Rancourt G, Abbo T et al. (2020) The scaling of genome size and cell size limits maximum rates of photosynthesis with implications for ecological strategies. Int J Plant Sci 181:75\u0026ndash;87. doi:10.1086/706186\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRu\u0026iacute;z Rej\u0026oacute;n M, Sa\u0026ntilde;udo A (1976) Estudios cariologicos en especies espa\u0026ntilde;olas del orden Liliales. I. \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eLapiedra\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eNarcissus\u003c/em\u003e. Lagascalia 6:225\u0026ndash;238.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRu\u0026iacute;z Rej\u0026oacute;n M, Oliver JL, Ru\u0026iacute;z Rej\u0026oacute;n C et al (1980) Numeros cromosomicos para la flora espa\u0026ntilde;ola. 121-182. Lagascalia 9:249\u0026ndash;284.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRu\u0026iacute;z Rej\u0026oacute;n C, Lozano R, Ru\u0026iacute;z Rej\u0026oacute;n M (1986) N\u0026uacute;meros cromos\u0026oacute;micos para la flora espa\u0026ntilde;ola, numeros 479-484. Lagascalia 14:292\u0026ndash;297.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026Scaron;af\u0026aacute;řov\u0026aacute; L, Duchoslav M (2010) Cytotype distribution in mixed populations of polyploid \u003cem\u003eAllium oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e measured at a microgeographic scale. Preslia 82:107\u0026ndash;126.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026Scaron;af\u0026aacute;řov\u0026aacute; L, Duchoslav M, Jandov\u0026aacute; M et al (2011) \u003cem\u003eAllium oleraceum\u003c/em\u003e in Slovakia: cytotype distribution and ecology. Preslia 83:513\u0026ndash;527.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSalmeri C, Brullo C, Brullo S et al (2016) What is \u003cem\u003eAllium paniculatum\u003c/em\u003e? Establishing taxonomic and molecular phylogenetic relationships within \u003cem\u003eA.\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e. J Syst Evol 54:123\u0026ndash;135. doi:10.1111/jse.12170\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSalmeri C, Brullo S, Messina V (2014) Analisi molecolare e filogenesi delle specie a fioritura tardiva del genere \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Amaryllidaceae, Allioideae). Flora vascolare d\u0026apos;Italia: studi biosistematici, taxa endemici e loci classici, SOCIET\u0026Agrave; BOTANICA ITALIANA, Orto botanico, La Sapienza Universit\u0026agrave; di Roma, 19-20 ottobre 2012, pp. 43\u0026ndash;45.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSchmitt T (2007) Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and postglacial trends. Front Zool 4:11. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-4-11\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSchubert I, Lys\u0026aacute;k MA (2011) Interpretation of karyotype evolution should consider chromosome structural constraints. Trends Genet. 27: 207\u0026ndash;216. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.03.004\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSeregin AP (2007) The genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. (Alliaceae) in the flora of Eastern Europe. PhD dissertation, Lomonosov State University, Moscow.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShmida A, Kollmann F (1977) \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003especies of Mt. Hermon. II. Distribution, variation and polyploidy correlated with vertical zonation. Isr J Bot 26:149\u0026ndash;159.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSiljak-Yakovlev S, Muratović E. Bogunić F\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eet al. (2020) Genome size of Balkan flora: a database (GeSDaBaF) and C-values for 51 taxa of which 46 are novel. Plant Syst Evol 306:40. doi:10.1007/s00606-020-01670-y\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026Scaron;\u0026iacute;mov\u0026aacute; I, Herben T (2012) Geometrical constraints in the scaling relationships between genome size, cell size and cell cycle length in herbaceous plants. Proc R Soc B Bio. Sci 279:867\u0026ndash;875. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1284\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSinitsina TA (2019) Genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. (Alliaceae) in Siberia. Vavilovia 2:3\u0026ndash;22. doi:10.30901/2658-3860-2019-3-3-22\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSliwinska E, Loureiro J Leitch IJ et al (2022) Application-based guidelines for best practices in plant flow cytometry. Cytometry A 101:749\u0026ndash;781. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.24499\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026Scaron;marda P, Bure\u0026scaron; P (2010) Understanding intraspecific variation in genome size in plants. Preslia 82:41\u0026ndash;61.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026Scaron;marda P, Kn\u0026aacute;pek O, Březinov\u0026aacute; A et al (2019) Genome sizes and genomic guanine+cytosine (GC) contents of the Czech vascular flora with new estimates for 1700 species. Preslia 91:117\u0026ndash;142. doi:10.23855/preslia.2019.117\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSochor M, Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček B, Kir\u0026aacute;ly G (2019) Ploidy level variation in the genus \u003cem\u003eRubus\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ein the Pannonian Basin and the northern Balkans, and evolutionary implications. Pl Syst Evol 305:611\u0026ndash;626. doi:10.1007/s00606-019-01593-3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026Scaron;paniel S, Re\u0026scaron;etnik I (2022) Plant phylogeography of the Balkan Peninsula: spatio-temporal patterns and processes. Pl Syst Evol 308:38. doi:10.1007/s00606-022-01831-1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSpeta F (1984) \u0026Uuml;ber Ober\u0026ouml;sterreich wildwachsende Laucharten (\u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e L, Alliaceae). Linz Biol Beitr 16:45\u0026ndash;81.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStearn WT (1980)\u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA et al (eds) Flora Europaea, Volume 5: Alismataceae to Orchidaceae (Monocotyledones). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 49\u0026ndash;69.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStebbins GL (1971) Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold, London.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStrid A, Franz\u0026eacute;n R (1981) Reports by A. Strid and R. Franz\u0026eacute;n. In: L\u0026ouml;ve \u0026Aacute; (ed) Chromosome Number Reports LXXIII. Taxon 30:829\u0026ndash;861. doi:10.1002/j.1996-8175.1981.tb04309.x\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStuessy TF (2009) Plant Taxonomy. The Systematic Evolution of Comparative Data, 2nd Edition. Columbia University Press, New York.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSuda J, Krahulcov\u0026aacute; A, Tr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček P et al (2006) Ploidy level vs. DNA ploidy level: an appeal for consistent terminology. Taxon 55: 447\u0026ndash;450. doi:10.2307/25065591\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTanker N, Kurucu S (1979) Cytotaxonomical researches on some species of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003enaturally growing in Turkey. Ankara Univo Eczac Fak Mecm 9:1\u0026ndash;82.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTara\u0026scaron;ka V, Batou\u0026scaron;ek P, Duchoslav M et al (2021) Morphological variability, cytotype diversity, and cytogeography of populations traditionally called \u003cem\u003eDactylorhiza fuchsii\u003c/em\u003e in Central Europe. Pl Syst Evol 307:51. doi:10.1007/s00606-021-01770-3\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTara\u0026scaron;ka V, Duchoslav M, Hrone\u0026scaron; M et al (2024) \u003cem\u003eDactylorhiza maculata\u003c/em\u003e agg. (Orchidaceae) in Central Europe: Intricate Patterns in Morphological Variability, Cytotype Diversity and Ecology Support the Single-Species Concept. Folia Geobot 58:151\u0026ndash;188. doi:10.1007/s12224-024-09441-0\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTeofilovski A (2021) New floristic data in North Macedonia with a first record of \u003cem\u003eAllium melanantherum\u003c/em\u003e Pančić. Biol Nyssana 12:1\u0026ndash;10. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5522951\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTerlević A, Bogdanović S, Frajman B et al (2022) Genome size variation in \u003cem\u003eDianthus sylvestris\u003c/em\u003e Wulfen sensu lato (Caryophyllaceae). Plants 11:1481. doi:10.3390/plants11111481\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTison JM, de Foucault B (eds) (2014) Flora Gallica: Flore de France. Biotope \u0026Eacute;ditions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTornadore N (1981) Numeri cromosomici per la flora italiana: 806-813. Inform Bot Ital 13:151\u0026ndash;157.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTornadore N, Marcucci R (2005) Analisi cariologica e micromorfologica di alcuni taxa del Distretto Euganeo (Padova, NE Italia). Inform Bot Ital 37:56\u0026ndash;57.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTr\u0026aacute;jer AJ, Sebesty\u0026eacute;n V, Padis\u0026aacute;k J (2021) The impacts of the Messinian salinity crisis on the biogeography of three Mediterranean sandfly (Diptera: Psychodidae) species. Geobios 65:51\u0026ndash;66. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2021.02.003\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTr\u0026aacute;vn\u0026iacute;ček P, Jers\u0026aacute;kov\u0026aacute; J, Kub\u0026aacute;tkov\u0026aacute; B et al (2012) Minority cytotypes in European populations of the \u003cem\u003eGymnadenia conopsea\u003c/em\u003e complex (Orchidaceae) greatly increase intraspecific and intrapopulation diversity. Ann Bot 110:977\u0026ndash;986. doi:10.1093/aob/mcs171\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTrigas P, Iatrou G, Tzanoudakis D (2010) \u003cem\u003eAllium apergii\u003c/em\u003e sp. nov. (Alliaceae, \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e) from Evvia Island, Greece. J Biol Res-Thessalon 14:225\u0026ndash;229.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTrigas P, Kalpoutzakis E, Constantinidis T (2017) Two new \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(\u003cem\u003eA.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003esect. \u003cem\u003eCupanioscordum\u003c/em\u003e, Amaryllidaceae) species from Greece. Phytotaxa 297:179\u0026ndash;188. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.297.2.5\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTschermak-Woess E (1947) \u0026Uuml;ber chromosomale Plastizit\u0026auml;t bei Wildformen von \u003cem\u003eAllium carinatum\u003c/em\u003e und anderen \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e-Arten aus den Ostalpen. Chromosoma 3:66\u0026ndash;87.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTzanoudakis D, Trigas P (2015) \u003cem\u003eAllium occultum\u003c/em\u003e, a new species of \u003cem\u003eA\u003c/em\u003e. sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Amaryllidaceae) from Skiros Island (W Aegean, Greece). Phytotaxa 202:135\u0026ndash;142. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.202.2.5\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTzanoudakis D, Tsakiri M, Raus Th (2019) What is \u003cem\u003eAllium achaium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eBoiss. \u0026amp; Orph.? Disentangling the taxonomy of a Greek mountain species. Willdenowia 49:231\u0026ndash;239. do:i10.3372/wi.49.49211\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTzanoudakis D, Vosa CG (1988) The cytogeographical distribution pattern of \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e (Alliaceae) in the Greek Peninsula and Islands. Pl Syst Evol 159:193\u0026ndash;215.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVakhtina LI (1964) Chromosome numbers of some species of the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e, occurring in the territory of the USSR. Bot Zhurn 49:870\u0026ndash;875.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVakhtina LI, Kudryjashova GL (1985) Karyosystematic study in some species of the section \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e of the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e (Alliaceae). Bot Zhurn 70:76\u0026ndash;88.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVakhtina LI, Zakirova RO, Vakhtin YB (1977) Interspecific differences in DNA contents and taxonomically valid characters in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. (Liliaceae). Bot Zhurn 62:677\u0026ndash;682.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVan de Peer Y, Mizrachi E, Marchal K (2017) The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat Rev Genet 18:411\u0026ndash;424. doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.26\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVed Brat S (1965) Genetic systems in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e, I. Chromosome variation. Chromosoma 16:486\u0026ndash;499.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVesel\u0026yacute; P, Bure\u0026scaron; P, \u0026Scaron;marda P et al (2012) Genome size and DNA base composition of geophytes: the mirror of phenology and ecology? Ann Bot 109:65\u0026ndash;75. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr267\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVejvodov\u0026aacute; K, Krejč\u0026iacute; J, Kouteck\u0026yacute; P et al (2024) High mountains of central Europe as a refuge of surprising cytotype diversity of \u003cem\u003eHuperzia selago\u003c/em\u003e (Lycopodiaceae). Alp Bot 134:87\u0026ndash;100. doi:10.1007/s00035-024-00312-0\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVojtěchov\u0026aacute; K, Kobrlov\u0026aacute; L, Sch\u0026ouml;nswetter P et al (2023) Disentangling the taxonomic structure of the \u003cem\u003eAllium paniculatum\u003c/em\u003e species complex in central and eastern Europe using molecular, cytogenetic and morphological tools. Preslia 95:119\u0026ndash;163. doi:10.23855/preslia.2023.119\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVojtěchov\u0026aacute; K, Kobrlov\u0026aacute; L, Kitner M et al (2024) \u003cem\u003eAllium goumenissanum\u003c/em\u003e (Amaryllidaceae), a new species for Bulgaria and new localities in Greece, with additions to the genetic, cytogenetic and morphological characteristics of the species. Mediterr Bot 45:e89106. doi:10.5209/mbot.89106\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVosa CG (1976) Heterochromatic banding pattern in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e. II. Heterochromatin variation in species of the \u003cem\u003epaniculatum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003egroup. Chromosoma 57:119\u0026ndash;133.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVujo\u0026scaron;ević M, Jovanović V, Blagojević J (2013) Polyploidy and b chromosomes in \u003cem\u003eAllium flavum\u003c/em\u003e from Serbia. Arch Biol Sci 65:23\u0026ndash;32. doi:10.2298/ABS1301023V\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVvedensky A (1935) \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. In: Komarov VL (ed) Flora SSSR, Vol. 4. Liliiflorae, Microspermae. Izdateľstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva \u0026amp; Leningrad, pp. 112\u0026ndash;280.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWang X, Morton JA, Pellicer J et al (2021) Genome downsizing after polyploidy: mechanisms, rates and selection pressures. Plant J 107:1003\u0026ndash;1015. doi:10.1111/tpj.15363\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWang G, Zhou N, Chen Q et al (2023) Gradual genome size evolution and polyploidy in \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Ann Bot 131:109\u0026ndash;122. doi:10.1093/aob/mcab155\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWeiss-Schneeweiss H, Greilhuber J, Schneeweiss GM (2006) Genome size evolution in holoparasitic \u003cem\u003eOrobanche\u003c/em\u003e (Orobanchaceae) and related genera. Am J Bot 93:148\u0026ndash;156. doi:10.3732/ajb.93.1.148\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWetching VW (1992) Chromosomenzahlen K\u0026auml;rntner Gef\u0026auml;\u0026szlig;pflanzen (Teil 3): Karyologie und Verbreitung der \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e-Arten (Alliaceae) in K\u0026auml;rnten. Carinthia II 182:497\u0026ndash;533.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWilde-Duyfjes de BEE (1976) A revision of the genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. (Liliaceae) in Africa. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen 76:1\u0026ndash;237.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWu LL, Cui XK, Milne RI et al (2010) Multiple autopolyploidizations and range expansion of \u003cem\u003eAllium przewalskianum\u003c/em\u003e Regel. (Alliaceae) in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Mol Ecol 19:1691\u0026ndash;704. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04613.x\u003cu\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZakirova RO, Nafanailova II (1988) Chromosome numbers in members of some families of the Kazakhstan flora. Bot Zhurn 73:452\u0026ndash;453.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZahariadi C (1966) \u003cem\u003eAllium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL. In: Săvulescu T (ed.) Flora republicae socialisticae Romanicae 11. Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste Rom\u0026acirc;nia, Bucharest, pp. 187\u0026ndash;267.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZahariadi C (1975) Le sous-genre \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Genre \u003cem\u003eAlium\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eL., fam. Alliaceae Agardh 1858) en Grece et en Roumainie. IIe partie. Biologia Gallo-Helenica 6:27\u0026ndash;64.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZonneveld BJM (2001) Nuclear DNA contents of all species of \u003cem\u003eHelleborus\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(Ranunculaceae) discriminate between species and sectional divisions. Pl Syst Evol 229:125\u0026ndash;130. doi:10.1007/s006060170022\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"botanical-studies","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"bost","sideBox":"Learn more about [Botanical Studies](http://as-botanicalstudies.springeropen.com)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/bost/default.aspx","title":"Botanical Studies","twitterHandle":"@SpringerOpen","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"cytogeography, DNA ploidy level, chromosome number, flow cytometry, genome size, polyploidy","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4972960/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4972960/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe genus \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e is known for its high chromosomal variability, but most chromosome counts are based on a few individuals and genome size (GS) reports are limited in certain taxonomic groups. This is evident in the \u003cem\u003eAllium\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eCodonoprasum\u003c/em\u003e, a species-rich (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;150 species) and taxonomically complex section with weak morphological differences between taxa, the presence of polyploidy and frequent misidentification of taxa. Consequently, a significant proportion of older karyological reports may be unreliable and GS data are lacking for the majority of species within the section. This study, using chromosome counting and flow cytometry (FCM), provides the first complex and detailed insight into variation in chromosome number, polyploid frequency and distribution, and GS in section members, a step towards understanding the section's unresolved diversification and evolution.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe analysed 1,582 individuals from 311 populations of 25 taxa and reported DNA ploidy levels and their GS, with calibration from chromosome counts in 21 taxa. Five taxa had multiple ploidy levels. GS estimates for 16 taxa are primary estimates. A comprehensive review of chromosome number and DNA-ploidy levels in 128 taxa of the section revealed that all taxa had x\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8, except \u003cem\u003eA. rupestre\u003c/em\u003e with two polyploid series (x\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8, descending dysploidy x\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7), unique for this section. Diploid taxa dominated (71.1%), while di-/polyploid (12.5%) and pure polyploid (16.4%) taxa were less common. Ploidy diversity showed that diploid taxa were dominant in the eastern Mediterranean (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;85%), decreasing towards the west and north, with only polyploid taxa present in northern and northwestern Europe. A 4.1-fold variation in GS was observed across 33 taxa (2C\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;22.3\u0026ndash;92.1 pg), mainly due to polyploidy, with GS downsizing observed in taxa with multiple ploidy levels. Intra-sectional GS variation suggests evolutionary relationships, and intraspecific GS variation within some taxa may indicate taxonomic heterogeneity and/or historical migration patterns.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur study showed advantages of FCM as an effective tool for detecting ploidy levels and determining GS within the section. GS could be an additional character in understanding evolution and phylogenetic relationships within the section.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"New estimates and synthesis of chromosome number, ploidy level and genome size variation in Allium sect. Codonoprasum: a step towards understanding the hitherto unresolved diversification and evolution of the section","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-09-09 21:51:28","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4972960/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Minor revision","date":"2024-10-17T04:26:53+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2024-09-02T07:39:37+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-09-02T07:35:23+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-08-28T15:33:52+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Botanical Studies","date":"2024-08-25T09:40:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"botanical-studies","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"bost","sideBox":"Learn more about [Botanical Studies](http://as-botanicalstudies.springeropen.com)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/bost/default.aspx","title":"Botanical Studies","twitterHandle":"@SpringerOpen","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"d2ff6fa6-a79c-4054-bc7e-56253e960e31","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 9th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-12-30T16:03:12+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4972960","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-024-00446-8","journal":{"identity":"botanical-studies","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Botanical Studies"},"publishedOn":"2024-12-24 15:57:50","publishedOnDateReadable":"December 24th, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-09-09 21:51:28","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s40529-024-00446-8","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-024-00446-8","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4972960","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4972960","identity":"rs-4972960","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}