Comparison of conventional CO2 diagnostic hysteroscopy vs. vaginoscopic approach using saline \n

Sanna S, Vacca B, MELIS, GIAN BENEDETTO, Angioni, Stefano
2009 · W7064935307
article OA: closed CC0 Metadata only
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-08 ⓘ

This study compared the diagnostic hysteroscopy outcomes between a conventional CO2 method and a vaginoscopic approach using saline, evaluating their respective efficacies.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T07:27:33.679367+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK