Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonists Combined with Hormone Replacement Therapy Significantly Improves Reproductive Outcomes for Patients with Thin Endometrium and Intramural Fibroids in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles

article OA: green CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex

Abstract

Longlong Wei,1,2 Bing Tian,2 Shuna Wang,2 Siyue Xu,2 Cuilian Zhang1,2 1People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 45003, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 45003, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Cuilian Zhang, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 7, Wei Wu Road, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, 450003, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: Both intramural myomas and thin endometrium exert a detrimental influence on the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The downregulation of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) is regarded as an effective approach to reducing the size of intramural fibroids and enhancing endometrial receptivity. Consequently, we conducted this study to assess whether the GnRH-a combined with hormone replacement therapy (GnRH-a-HRT) can improve reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer cycles for patients with a thin endometrium (≤ 7 mm) and intramural fibroids.Methods: This retrospective cohort study encompassed 360 patients who underwent frozen embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the endometrial preparation protocol: the natural cycle (NC) group (n=96), the hormone replacement therapy (HRT) group (n=180), and the GnRH-a-HRT group (n=84). The live birth rate (LBR) was designated as the primary outcome, while clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), miscarriage rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate were classified as secondary outcomes.Results: The LBR and CPR in the GnRH-a-HRT group were significantly higher than those in both the HRT group and the NC group (both P < 0.0001). A logistic regression model indicated that the LBR was significantly higher in the GnRH-a-HRT group compared to both the HRT group (odds ratio, 0.269; 95% confidence interval, 0.114– 0.637; P = 0.003) and the NC group (odds ratio, 0.524; 95% confidence interval, 0.457– 0.956; P = 0.023). Subgroup analyses based on the number and dimension of fibroids demonstrate the positive efficacy of the GnRH-a–HRT regimen.Conclusion: Compared to NC and HRT protocol, improved reproductive outcomes were observed in the GnRH-a–HRT group. These findings provide valuable insights for exploration of the underlying mechanisms by which the GnRH-a-HRT protocol enhances reproductive outcomes in patients of thin endometrium with intramural fibroids.Keywords: frozen embryo transfer, live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, thin endometrium, intramural fibroid
Full text 2,930 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Drug Design, Development and Therapy (Jan 2025) Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonists Combined with Hormone Replacement Therapy Significantly Improves Reproductive Outcomes for Patients with Thin Endometrium and Intramural Fibroids in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles Abstract Longlong Wei,1,2 Bing Tian,2 Shuna Wang,2 Siyue Xu,2 Cuilian Zhang1,2 1People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 45003, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 45003, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Cuilian Zhang, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 7, Wei Wu Road, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, 450003, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: Both intramural myomas and thin endometrium exert a detrimental influence on the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The downregulation of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) is regarded as an effective approach to reducing the size of intramural fibroids and enhancing endometrial receptivity. Consequently, we conducted this study to assess whether the GnRH-a combined with hormone replacement therapy (GnRH-a-HRT) can improve reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer cycles for patients with a thin endometrium (≤ 7 mm) and intramural fibroids.Methods: This retrospective cohort study encompassed 360 patients who underwent frozen embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the endometrial preparation protocol: the natural cycle (NC) group (n=96), the hormone replacement therapy (HRT) group (n=180), and the GnRH-a-HRT group (n=84). The live birth rate (LBR) was designated as the primary outcome, while clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), miscarriage rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate were classified as secondary outcomes.Results: The LBR and CPR in the GnRH-a-HRT group were significantly higher than those in both the HRT group and the NC group (both P < 0.0001). A logistic regression model indicated that the LBR was significantly higher in the GnRH-a-HRT group compared to both the HRT group (odds ratio, 0.269; 95% confidence interval, 0.114– 0.637; P = 0.003) and the NC group (odds ratio, 0.524; 95% confidence interval, 0.457– 0.956; P = 0.023). Subgroup analyses based on the number and dimension of fibroids demonstrate the positive efficacy of the GnRH-a–HRT regimen.Conclusion: Compared to NC and HRT protocol, improved reproductive outcomes were observed in the GnRH-a–HRT group. These findings provide valuable insights for exploration of the underlying mechanisms by which the GnRH-a-HRT protocol enhances reproductive outcomes in patients of thin endometrium with intramural fibroids.Keywords: frozen embryo transfer, live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, thin endometrium, intramural fibroid

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-13T18:17:55.461938+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK