Adherence to Hormonal Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Single-Center Study.

Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer, affecting approximately one-third of female cancer patients [ 1 ]. Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide; the estimated incidence in the United States in 2019 is 268,600, accounting for 30% of all cancer cases [ 1 ]. The mortality rate of breast cancer is 12.9% [ 2 - 3 ]. Breast cancer accounted for 14.8% of all cancers reported in Saudi and 29.7% of all cancers reported in females in Saudi Arabia [ 4 ]. Breast cancer is being diagnosed in an increasing number of women, affecting their physical health, emotional functioning, and overall quality of life [ 5 - 6 ]. Numerous factors contributed to an increased risk of breast cancer, including reproductive and estrogen-related factors, obesity, endometriosis, hypertension, chest radiation exposure, dyslipidemia, family history of ovarian or breast cancer, early menarche (age 12 years), late menopause (age > 55 years), alcohol consumption, and smoking [ 7 - 8 ]. Breast cancer can be treated adjuvant with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, or hormonal therapy, depending on multiple factors such as genetic mutation, cancer stage, and metastatic status [ 9 ]. About three-quarters of all patients diagnosed with breast cancers are estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) and progesterone receptor-positive “PR-positive, consequently, most patients are offered hormonal therapy for five to 10 years [ 9 - 11 ]. Hormonal therapy is associated with positive outcomes leading to lower rates of disease recurrence, metastasis and decrease mortality rates, and disease-free survival [ 12 - 13 ]. According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), hormonal therapy is considered a standard of care in the treatment of women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer [ 9 ]. Many factors play a fundamental role in the outcomes of adjuvant therapy, but perhaps one of the most critical is treatment adherence [ 14 ]. Improving medication adherence has become a priority for practitioners and manufacturers of new oral therapies in the context of improving outcomes [ 15 ]. Recently, many studies notifying poor adherence to hormonal therapy among patients with breast cancer [ 16 - 18 ]. Despite the positive results of hormone therapy, many women discontinue treatment prematurely for a variety of reasons, including nausea, hot flashes, insomnia, and sexual dysfunction [ 16 - 18 ]. However, most of the adverse reactions are not life-threatening, but they can be very distressing for some patients and affect their quality of life [ 11 , 19 - 20 ]. Adherence to hormone-based therapy is a clinically significant issue, particularly given the relatively long duration of hormone treatment. Patients must take hormonal therapy on a daily basis for five to 10 years to achieve the best possible results [ 9 , 21 ]. Numerous studies demonstrate statistically significant associations between non-adherence to hormonal therapy and adverse economic or medical outcomes such as cancer progression, increased inpatient days, increased total health care spending, and decreased disease-free survival [ 22 - 24 ]. One cross-sectional study was conducted to determine adherence to adjuvant tamoxifen in patients with breast cancer in the Saudi Arabian population. Patients who received other adjuvant hormonal therapy were excluded from this study, and 30% of the patient population who received tamoxifen had an adherence rate of less than 85%. Additionally, this study did not discuss the reasons for non-adherence to hormonal therapy or the effect of non-adherence on treatment outcomes [ 25 ]. To our knowledge, there is insufficient data on adherence to hormonal therapy and mortality among breast cancer patients in Saudi Arabia. The primary objectives of this study are to determine adherence to hormonal therapy, disease progression, and mortality in Saudi Arabian patients with breast cancer.

A total of 121 patients were included in the study from the 380 patients screened. Tamoxifen, letrozole, and anastrozole were administered to 58%, 27%, and 14% of patients, respectively. The distribution of baseline characteristics among women with breast cancer is shown in Table 1 . Women with breast cancer who were receiving hormone therapy on average age were 53 (±13). The findings indicate that 52.34%, 42.41%, and 5.25% of women, respectively, were postmenopausal, premenopausal, or perimenopausal. The majority of patients were diagnosed with breast cancer stage II and Stage I (56.2% and 16.5%, respectively). Grade II was the highest among the study population reaching up to 58.6% followed by Grade III (17.36%) and Grade I (12.22%). Approximately 55.3%, 42.15%, and 2.48% of patients were found to have cancer on their left side, right side, and both sides, respectively. The majority of women (83.47%) tested positive for PR while 93.39% tested positive for ER. However, only 20.66% of females tested positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Additionally, approximately 28.93% of females had lymph vascular invasion. Chemotherapy was administered to the majority of women (65%). Twenty-one percent (21%) of patients experience at least one episode of relapse. Only 12.4% of patients followed throughout the study period were lost to follow-up. A total of 121 patients were enrolled during the study period; approximately 58% of patients received tamoxifen, 27% received letrozole, and 15% received anastrozole (Figures 1 - 2 ). On the other hand, 69% of patients were found to be adherent to their hormonal therapy while 31% did not meet the adherence criteria (Figures 1 - 2 ). Adjusted and non-adjusted models for mortality and cancer recurrence by hormonal therapy adherence are presented in Table 2 . With hormonal therapy adherence and disease progression, the adherence group shows a higher result of survival relapsed probability compared to the non-adherent group, On the other hand, the adherence group shows a higher mortality probability compared to the non-adherent group (Figure 3 ). Adherence did not show a significant correlation to disease progression (HR, 0.666; 95% CI, 0.257-1.725) or mortality (HR, 1.391; 95% CI, 0.332-5.828). Adherence criteria were not met in 30.58% of the study population.

The observed rate of adherence to hormone treatment (69%) was similar to findings from earlier published research, which suggested proportions of 60% to 72% adhere to hormonal therapy in breast cancer [ 27 - 28 ]. We highlight the challenges characteristic in matching certain previously published studies owing to changes in adherence definitions, research methodologies, and medication types utilized (only tamoxifen, only aromatase inhibitors, or both). We used the proportion of days covered (PDC) as the definition of measurement of adherence in our study [ 29 ]. The PDC cutoff point is the point at which treatment has a reasonable chance of having the greatest therapeutic benefit. Clinical research supports an 80% PDC threshold as a standard [ 29 ]. In our study, we used data from a single regional institution, which we recognize as a limitation. However, it is critical to underline that the hospital provides regional access, limiting admission to individuals who have already received treatment at other sites. In terms of illness stage, the discovery of decreased compliance among patients in incurable stages (III and IV) contrasts with the finding that women with bigger tumors adhered more closely [ 27 , 30 ]. Our study determined that there was no correlation between these characteristics. Relating to the kind of hormone treatment, additional studies have shown a low adherence rate among patients who received both tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors [ 31 - 32 ]. This observation might be explained by aromatase inhibitors' frequent musculoskeletal toxicity associated with this class of medication [ 33 ]. Other studies have indicated no statistically significant differences in adherence between various forms of hormone treatment [ 34 - 35 ]. While anastrozole had a lower adherence rate than tamoxifen [ 35 ], it is worth noting that the majority (58%) of women in the present research cohort got tamoxifen alone while 27% received letrozole and a few women (14%) received just anastrozole. Our observation of no association between adherence to hormone treatment and breast cancer outcomes contrasts with previous findings of strong links between adherence and breast cancer progression [ 36 - 37 ]. The lack of improvement in recurrence and survival with increased adherence rates in our sample could be explained by factors unique to this patient population and the breast cancers that develop in this population, the methodological limitations of refill data, and the inability to detect a potentially small effect. Our adherence metric, PDC, has been used before in studies of hormone treatment and breast cancer outcomes [ 38 ]. It is an excellent tool with minor limitations like some patients completed their prescriptions but likely did not take their medication. Second, prescription refill statistics are prone to inaccuracy due to the usage of inexpensive medicines obtained from other sources. There may be features of this patient population that account for the absence of a correlation between adherence and breast cancer recurrence or survival. Additionally, there are known lifestyle variables, such as smoking, obesity, and inactivity, which have an effect on post-breast cancer outcomes and are more prevalent in women with poor socioeconomic status [ 39 - 42 ]. These variables may obscure the efficacy of adjuvant hormonal therapy adherence. Another factor to consider is patient features that impair the effectiveness of adjuvant hormonal treatment. It has been found that adverse events are a significant predictor of adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy, such that patients experiencing fewer adverse events are more likely to adhere to treatment [ 43 - 44 ]. One limitation of this research is the possibility of the absence of a confounding variable, which would explain the absence of association between adherence and breast cancer outcomes, as is often the case with refill data. To minimize selection bias, we focused also on both relapse and mortality. Finally, our ability to identify differences in breast cancer outcomes, especially cancer-free survival, may have been hindered by the sample size and/or duration of follow-up. Survival differences associated with adjuvant hormonal treatment are commonly seen at five to 10 years, but cumulative mortality reductions maybe twice as large after 15 years [ 13 ].​​​​​​​ In conclusion, we found no correlation between adjuvant hormonal therapy adherence and breast cancer recurrence or mortality in this study of breast cancer patients. A larger study is required to confirm the findings of this study. Besides that, we encourage researchers to conduct additional studies on newer oncology drugs that are taken orally and to assess drug adherence, given the limited research in this field in Saudi Arabia.

According to the findings of this study, 69% of patients adhered to their hormone treatment regimen. However, it did not appear that adherence to hormonal therapy was associated with disease progression or mortality. A larger study is needed to confirm the findings of our study.

This is a retrospective cohort study. Data were obtained from two specialized clinics for breast cancer management. The entire study population included in this study was obtained from the hospital's breast cancer registry data, and data were obtained from King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC) using the health information system, Medica Plus. All demographic and laboratory data were available in Medica Plus and other data were obtained from patient files that were available in the medical recorded department in KAMC, for example, if they had surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormone therapy. Patients who visited the clinics between 2008 and 2016 were included in the study. Patients were followed in breast cancer clinics every three months. King Abdullah Medical City in Makkah is a 550-bed quaternary specialty healthcare institution in Saudi Arabia's Makkah region. The specialized hospital center is a quaternary hospital in Makkah, Saudi Arabia's Holy Capital. It is home to several centers of expertise, including cardiovascular, neurosciences, oncology, and specialized surgery. We selected research participants using convenience sampling and included all patients who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria at our facility. Data from other hospitals in the area were not authorized to be accessed at the time this study was undertaken; this is one of our research's limitations. Inclusion criteria The inclusion criteria were: Adult patients (18 years or more), diagnosed with breast cancer and receiving adjuvant hormonal treatment with at least two prescription refills after the breast cancer diagnosis date; non-metastatic cancer, which is Stage I, Stage II, or Stage III, hormonal receptor-positive, regardless of the number of receptors; breast cancer as the primary tumor diagnosis; and patients who had received breast cancer treatment, either surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormone therapy. Exclusion criteria The exclusion criteria were: Patients with metastatic breast cancer; patients continuing his/her treatment regimen in another health care institution; and patients starting treatment after January 1, 2017. Adherence measurement Hormonal therapy adherence was evaluated using the proportion of days covered (PDC). PDC was calculated as the number of days in the period covered by prescription divided by the number of days in the period. The post-index date PDC for hormonal medication was estimated for each patient. Patients were not counted twice if they filled a prescription for any drug in the same class. Adherence was defined as a PDC of ≥ 0.8 [ 26 ]. Covariates (confounding factor) Patients’ demographic information, including age, status, and chemotherapy, were from Medica Plus, and tumor characteristics, including stage, grade, tumor size, number of presence positive lymph nodes, and estrogen receptor status, were identified in medical records and the hospital's own breast cancer registry data. Statistical analysis Means and proportions were used to report the patients’ baseline characteristics across cohorts, including demographic information (i.e., age, sex, marital status), tumor characteristics (i.e., stage, grade, estrogen receptor status, diagnosis year, tumor size, and some positive lymph nodes), and relevant treatments. Baseline characteristics were compared across cohorts using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. The models were adjusted for tumor characteristics (i.e., stage, grade, estrogen receptor status, diagnosis year, tumor size, and the number of positive lymph nodes), cancer treatments, and unbalanced covariates. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate the survival curves for breast cancer patients. Descriptive analysis was performed to examine the proportion of adherence to hormonal therapy. For analysis and interpretation, data were entered into IBM SPSS, version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).