Neptune: a toolbox for spinal cord functional MRI data processing and quality assurance

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,935 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Over the past two decades, open-source research software such as SPM, AFNI and FSL formed the substrate for advancements in the brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) field. The spinal cord fMRI field has matured substantially over the past decade, yet there is limited research software tailored for processing cord fMRI data that has distinct noise sources, unique challenges, niche processing requirements and special needs. Spinal cord fMRI data analysis is a ‘different beast’, involving specialized pre- and post-processing steps due to the cord’s unique anatomy and higher distortions/physiological noise, thus requiring extensive and careful quality assessment. Building upon 10+ years of research and development, we present Neptune – a user-interface-based MATLAB toolbox. With 30,000+ lines of in-house code, it is designed to be easy to use and does not require programming knowledge. Neptune builds on our previously published 15-step pre-processing pipeline (Barry et al., 2016) and presents a 19-step pipeline with new processing steps, and enhancements to existing steps. Neptune has a 4-step post-processing pipeline aimed at fMRI connectivity modeling. It generates extensive and novel quality control visuals to enable a thorough assessment of data quality, and displays them in an elegant webpage format. We demonstrate the utility of Neptune on our 7T data. Certain features of the popular Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT) are integrated into Neptune, and users can import/export between Neptune and other software such as FSL and SPM. The availability of this open-source, easy-to-use software will benefit the spinal cord fMRI community, and also tip the cost-benefit balance for brain fMRI researchers to invest in learning new software to conduct important neuroscientific and clinical research using spinal cord fMRI. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00