Full text
131,120 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Keywords
Green concrete; Palm Oil Fuel Ash; Response surface method; Early compressive strength; Hybrid fiber; Steel fiber; PET fiber; Silica fume; Sustainability
ALL Metrics
-
Views
Downloads
How to cite this article
Alani AH, Ahmed D, Al-obaidi QA et al. Optimizing Early Compressive Strength of Ultrafine POFA-Based Green HSC: An Experimental and Modeling Approach with Silica Fume and Hybrid Fibers [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2026, 15:103 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.175237.1) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Export Citation
Sciwheel
EndNote
Ref. Manager
Bibtex
ProCite
Sente
Select a format first
▬
✚
Research Article
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
Aktham H Alani
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8533-4859
1, Doaa Ahmed1, Qasim A. Al-obaidi2, Nahla Hilal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9403-9982
3, Megat Azmi Megat Johari4, Hayder Sadeq Al-Aasam https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1418-3234
5Aktham H Alani
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8533-4859
1, Doaa Ahmed1, [...] Qasim A. Al-obaidi2, Nahla Hilal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9403-9982
3, Megat Azmi Megat Johari4, Hayder Sadeq Al-Aasam https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1418-3234
5 PUBLISHED 22 Jan 2026
Author details Author details
1 Department of Engineering Affairs, University of Fallujah, Al-Fallujah, Al Anbar Governorate, Iraq
2 University of Bilad AL-Rafidain, Baqubah, Iraq
3 University of Fallujah, Scientific Affairs Department, Fallujah, Iraq
4 Universiti Sains Malaysia School of Civil Engineering, Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
5 Technical Engineering College, Al-Esraa University, Baghdad, Iraq
2 University of Bilad AL-Rafidain, Baqubah, Iraq
3 University of Fallujah, Scientific Affairs Department, Fallujah, Iraq
4 Universiti Sains Malaysia School of Civil Engineering, Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
5 Technical Engineering College, Al-Esraa University, Baghdad, Iraq
Aktham H Alani
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing
Doaa Ahmed
Roles: Methodology, Resources, Validation
Roles: Methodology, Resources, Validation
Qasim A. Al-obaidi
Roles: Methodology, Resources, Software
Roles: Methodology, Resources, Software
Nahla Hilal
Roles: Data Curation, Resources, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation
Roles: Data Curation, Resources, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation
Megat Azmi Megat Johari
Roles: Data Curation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation
Roles: Data Curation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation
Hayder Sadeq Al-Aasam
Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources
Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS
This article is included in the Fallujah Multidisciplinary Science and Innovation gateway.
Recently, studies have focused on producing green, sustainable concrete with improved environmental performance, utilizing recycled waste materials. The early compressive strength of Green High Strength Concrete (GHSC) containing up to 60% ultrafine palm oil fuel ash (UPOFA) has been optimized utilizing hybrid materials, Silica Fume (SF), steel fiber (ST), and Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) fiber. UPOFA was used as a substitute binder for cement in GHSC manufacture at 0%, 30%, and 60% replacement levels. SF was substituted for 0%, 10%, and 20% of the residual cement mass. Steel fiber and PET fiber were included at a rate of 1% of the total binder mass. The mix design parameters were optimized using the Response Surface Method (RSM) with a central composite design (CCD) approach. The experimental results showed that the GHSC containing 30% UPOFA, 20% SF, 1% ST, and 1% PET fiber reached greater strength at 3, 7, and 28 days. The incorporation of 20% SF, 1% ST, and 1% PET fibers enhanced the early ages strength reduction of 60% UPOFA-GHSC by 17%, 25%, and 18% at 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, relative to the control mix. The constructed models showed significant correlation values (R2) of 0.9697, 0.9546, and 0.9674 for compressive strength at 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively. Hence, RSM may be an efficient technique for improving mix design while lowering environmental impact by limiting waste volume and energy usage in cement manufacture, which contributes to the sustainability of concrete.
Green concrete; Palm Oil Fuel Ash; Response surface method; Early compressive strength; Hybrid fiber; Steel fiber; PET fiber; Silica fume; Sustainability
Corresponding Author(s)
Aktham H Alani ([email protected])
Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Copyright: © 2026 Alani AH et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Alani AH, Ahmed D, Al-obaidi QA et al. Optimizing Early Compressive Strength of Ultrafine POFA-Based Green HSC: An Experimental and Modeling Approach with Silica Fume and Hybrid Fibers [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2026, 15:103 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.175237.1) First published: 22 Jan 2026, 15:103 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.175237.1) Latest published: 05 May 2026, 15:103 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.175237.3) There is a newer version
of this article available.
of this article available.
The construction industry currently heavily relies on concrete, consuming around 10 billion tons annually. This demand is projected to rise significantly by 2050, potentially reaching 18 billion tons per year due to global population growth. However, this substantial production of concrete also results in a significant generation and emission of CO2, posing a major environmental concern.1,2 This issue requires further concern for developing eco-efficient and durable concrete alternatives. Numerous studies have shown that the cement sector alone contributes to about 8% of global CO2 emissions, underscoring the importance of collective responsibility.3–6 Researchers have played a pivotal role in examining the viability of using waste materials with significant pozzolanic potential as supplementary cementitious components in concrete formulations.7,8 Their efforts have been part of a larger initiative to identify industrial and agricultural wastes that might serve as substitutes for cement and aggregates, thereby mitigating the harmful effects associated with cement production.9,10 A common solution to this issue is replacing cement with recycled waste materials that have similar cementitious properties or pozzolanic attributes. Recent studies have identified palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as an effective pozzolanic material for cement replacement, highlighting its cost-effectiveness and environmental sustainability.11,12 POFA is a by-product derived from the combustion of wastes generated from palm oil extraction, including empty fruit bunches, palm kernel shells, and fibers. So, POFA is the final residue after the combustion of these wastes to heat up the boiler to generate electricity in the palm oil manufacturing process.13,14 Grinding–burning–regrinding is a novel treatment procedure that has been recently implemented to enhance the pozzolanic reactivity of the original POFA material and produce ultrafine POFA (UPOFA).8 Several studies have suggested that UPOFA can be used as an effective pozzolanic supplement binder replacing significant volume of Portland cement, leading to a significant improvement in the engineering properties of concrete and ensuring superior resistance to aggressive ions from the exposure environment.15,16 Nonetheless, several drawbacks have been reported from the substantial use of UPOFA as a supplementary cementitious ingredient in green concrete. These include significant reduction in early strength of concrete, where up to a 40% reduction in early concrete strength has been observed. Besides, the tensile strength reduced with UPOFA inclusion up to 20% content. This decrease is primarily due to the reduction in the cement binder content that the UPOFA replaced. These findings have major and crucial practical ramifications for the building sector, as demonstrated by numerous previous studies.15,17,18
As a result, studies revealed significant findings about the use of silica fume (SF), a common pozzolanic additive, in high-strength concrete mixes. It was found that silica fume can effectively accelerate the development of early concrete strength by increasing cement hydration via the huge surface area of the much finer silica fume particles relative to cement. The very fine particle of silica fume, which translates into an enormous surface area, not only enhances its filler effect but also accelerates the cement hydration as well as hastens the onset of pozzolanic reaction, leading to a substantial increase in the compressive strength of concrete at a young age.19–21 However, pozzolanic cementitious composite materials are prone to cracking due to their brittle characteristics.15,22,23 Therefore, the incorporation of fibers to produce what is known as fiber-reinforced concrete was considered to address the issues of brittleness and reduction in compressive and tensile strength with UPOFA inclusion.
There have been several attempts to increase concrete’s strength and durability performance.24,25 Researchers discovered that by incorporating appropriate fibers into the concrete matrix, they could increase the mechanical characteristics of the material and improve its strength properties. These properties prevented micro-cracks from expanding into macro-cracks, which improved the material’s overall durability. There were reports of effective incorporation of various fibers, such as steel fiber, polyvinyl alcohol, polypropylene, basalt, glass, and carbon fiber, etc.26–28 Steel fiber is the most common reinforcement used in concrete matrices, efficiently bridging micro-cracks caused by load conditions across crack surfaces, preventing macro-fracture growth. Steel fiber concentrations of less than 1.0% significantly increase concrete impact resistance. The studies attributed that to the steel fibers, which inhibit micro-crack propagation and their transition to macro-cracks during the impact compression process.29 Mezzal et al.30 investigated the effect of adding steel fiber at a volumetric percentage of 1% on concrete’s impact resistance, flexural, and tensile strength.
The fracturing of concrete is a progressive, multi-scale phenomenon that has led to significant interest in incorporating steel fibers alongside other fibers. This attraction is due to their potential advantages at various loading stages and scales compared to single-fiber reinforcements.31,32 In addition, the use of steel fibers in concrete elevates the structural weight of the material. The workability of the mix diminishes owing to the balling effect as the percentage of steel fibers increases. Steel fiber-reinforced concrete contains electric and magnetic fields, and the steel fibers inside the concrete are susceptible to corrosion. Nevertheless, fiber-reinforced concrete using a single fiber type offers reinforcement only at one level and within a restricted range of crack apertures. The appropriate mixture ratio of steel and synthetic fibers may provide excellent concrete performance, beyond the cumulative efficacy of the individual fibers.32–34 Recently, the recycling of single-use plastic bottles and containers has emerged as a worldwide concern due to the proliferation of plastic products. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is a key material in a variety of drinking containers and other consumer products. Its disposal is challenging and detrimental to the environment. However, there is reassurance in the ongoing efforts of researchers investigating PET waste as reinforcement in concrete, offering a potential method for recycling.35,36 Recent research found that inserting 0.25%-2% PET fibers into a concrete mix increased its strength by 43.4% at 28 days.37 The addition of 1% plastic fibers increased the flexural and tensile strengths of concrete approximately by 17 % and 15 %, respectively.38–40 Alani et al.41 discovered that adding 1% PET to ultra-high-strength concrete containing 20% SF and 25% UPOFA increased compressive strength by 18%, 21%, and 27% at 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, as compared to the plain concrete mix. Despite these positive results for UPOFA in green concrete manufacturing, the majority of current research demonstrates that its use in concrete remains limited by reducing concrete strength at early ages and requires further investigation. Hereby, the effect of the combination of SF, steel, and recycled PET fibers on GHSC strength containing up to 60% UPOFA has been investigated. The research also aimed to reduce the use of cement, which is linked to the reduction of building costs and the mitigation of the negative environmental impacts of CO2 emissions.
Researchers are concerned about the early strength loss of green high-strength concrete with a high volume of UPOFA replacement. The majority of the studies have looked at how steel or PET fiber affects the compressive and tensile strengths of GHSC. Recent innovative research has employed fibers to investigate early GHSC strength behavior at UPOFA concentrations as low as 40% of the total binder.
This study aimed to investigate the coupling effects of steel, PET fibers, and SF on the compressive and tensile strength of HSGC with low cement content. This includes up to 60% of UPOFA as a replacement binder with cement at the early ages of 3, 7, and 28 days. While UPOFA was employed as a replacement binder at a rate of 30% and 60%, SF was substituted at 10% and 20% of the total mass of the cement binder. Steel fiber was added at 1%, while PET fibers were added at 1%. The compressive and tensile strengths were analyzed and tested. Meanwhile, the response surface methodology (RSM) approach was employed to empirically determine the optimal hybrid fiber and pozzolanic secondary binders to achieve superior strength behavior for GHSC. Thus, the optimum values of UPOFA, SF, steel, and PET fibers for achieving GHSC’s superior compressive strength at early ages have been identified.
The main binder is standard Portland cement (OPC) [Type 1, 42.5 R], the specific surface area is 324 m 2/kg, and the specific gravity is 3.15. It is in accordance with the ASTM C150 standards.42 UPOFA (Figure 1) was selected as a partial replacement binder for its excellent pozzolanic properties and used in concentrations of 30% and 60% of the total mass of the OPC. Similarly, SF was chosen because of its peculiarities, accelerating influence on OPC hydration, and its remarkable pozzolanic activity. SF were substituted by 10% and 20% of the remaining of OPC. The chemical and physical properties of the binders were shown in Table 1.
The selected fine aggregate, river sand, has a maximal particle size of 4.75 mm, a specific gravity of 2.67, and a fineness modulus of 2.88. The crushed gravel, which was chosen for its potential as a coarse aggregate, has a specific gravity of 2.71 and a maximum size of 12.5 mm, to ensure that the compressive force may be imposed upon the matrix rather than on a rigid skeleton of aggregates, which decreases the stresses developed at the paste-aggregate interface. The more stress being transmitted by the aggregates and the surrounding matrix in HSC increased the opportunity for homogenous stress distribution.43
In order to achieve uniform dispersion and improve flowability with a low water-to-binder (w/b) ratio while maintaining high strength, a polycarboxylic ether-based high-range water-reducing admixture was utilized as a superplasticizer, which has a specific gravity of 1.080 and conforms to ASTM C 49444 specifications for chemical admixtures used in concrete. The concrete mixes and specimen curing in this study were performed with ordinary tap water.
Short brass-coated micro-steel fibers used in this study, as shown in Figure 2(a) have a length of 13 mm, a diameter of 0.2 mm, a tensile strength of up to 2600 MPa, and a density of approximately 7.80 g/cm. Plastic waste from polyethylene terephthalate (PET), as shown in Figure 2(b), with the following specifications: average length of 30 mm, breadth of 3 mm, thickness of 0.3 mm, specific gravity of 1.36, and water absorption of 0.17% was used as fiber reinforcement in this study.
The Design-Expert v13 program was employed for modeling, statistical analysis, and response optimization in this study. The central composite design (CCD) is a common method used in RSM. This approach was utilized to establish the relationship between the compressive strength responses at 3, 7, and 28 days and the parameters of UPOFA, SF, steel fiber, and PET fiber. The factorial experimental design for UPOFA and SF included three levels, while the designs for steel and PET fibers comprised two levels. As a result, the RSM technique was employed to optimize the responses of GHSC by varying the levels of these components. The independent variables and their corresponding coding values are shown in Table 2. Besides, Tables 3 and 4 present the results of the CCD approach in variables (%) and mixtures in (kg/m3), respectively, which were implemented in the design of forty-one experimental runs. The CCD design incorporated the center point of the experiment, which was replicated in five runs for M16, in addition to the initial thirty-six trials. This approach aimed to improve the precision of both the experimental design and the analysis. The optimum predictor quadratic model, as described in Equation (1), was used to ascertain the optimal parameters for compressive strength responses at 3, 7, and 28 days.
Where Y represents the response (compressive strength), and β and i denote the regression coefficients and linear coefficients, respectively. j represents the quadratic coefficient, xixj denotes the coded values for UPOFA, SF, steel fiber, and PET fiber. m signifies the number of components, and e indicates the random error. Except for the control mix, Table 4 showed that OPC weight changed with UPOFA and SF replacement percentages. All GHSC mixes contain the same weight of the GHSC components, which include river sand, crushed gravel, w/b ratio, and SP. This research investigated the effects of UPOFA and SF replacement levels, both with and without steel and PET fibers, on compressive strength responses at 3, 7, and 28 days using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The reliability of the quadratic prediction model was tested using this technique. The model consequently computed a 95% confidence level (P-value) to ascertain statistical significance. Furthermore, the R2 coefficient was calculated after a t-test with a 0.05 threshold of significance. The required model was developed based on actual findings from this research. Diagnostic diagrams were created to evaluate the model’s accuracy.
HSC and GHSC with and without fibers were prepared using a pan-type concrete mixer. During casting, the samples were consolidated on a vibrating table to obtain maximum density. After a critical 24-hour period, the specimens were carefully removed from their molds and underwent a rigorous water-curing procedure at a constant temperature of 27 ± 2 °C until the day of testing. HSC is common for its varying mixture compositions, which provide high-performance characteristics with compressive strength ranging from 62 to 138 MPa.
To attain the primary aim of this research, further experiments were conducted for each mixture of HSC and GHSC as given in Table 4.
2.7.1 Compressive strength test
In line with BS EN 12390-3,45 100 mm concrete cubes were tested using a 2000 kN concrete compression machine at a loading rate of 0.30 MPa/s. The compressive strength was next determined. At least three samples were tested for the different mixtures for each age of 3, 7, and 28 days.
The CCD related to varying variable content divides the HSC and GHSC mixtures, both with and without fiber, into three groups, as shown in Tables 3 and 4. The first group (G I) consists of HSC mixes numbered 0–11. The second group (G II) comprises GHSC-U30 mixes numbered 12 through 27. The third group (G III) is known as GHSC-U60 and includes mixes numbered 28 to 39.
Figures 3, 4, and 5 show that the incorporation of UPOFA reduces the compressive strength of GHSC at all ages (3, 7, and 28 days), with a more significant drop in strength at a higher UPOFA replacement level of U60%. The greater reduction in compressive strength was recorded by M28 (GHSC-U60), about 10%, 7% and 8% relative to the control mix, at 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, as shown in Figures 6, 7, and 8. This decrease is due to the dilution effect from the low OPC content, contributing towards delayed hydration and pozzolanic reaction of the U60-GHSC mixture, in particular at the early age, which is characterized by a high level of 60% UPOFA.46 As a consequence, the reduced strength was observed from the delayed and lower C-S-H production. Furthermore, the interaction between calcium hydroxide (CH) and silica concentration in POFA influences the concrete’s compressive strength.47,48 Further, the reduced cement content may minimize the amount of CH released during cement hydration. Thus, mixes with high UPOFA concentrations had lower compressive strength than concrete with a lower POFA fraction. Furthermore, the 75.2% concentration of pozzolanic characteristics (SiO2, Al2O3, and Fe2O3) may result in high calcium hydroxide (CH) consumption during hydration, as given in Table 1. These factors may result in a CH deficiency, limiting strength development.8,49,50 In contrast, the presence of SF, steel fiber, and PET fiber develops compressive strength at all ages of 3, 7, and 28 days.
The compressive strength of HSC and GHSC is considerably improved upon the incorporation of SF at concentrations of 10% and 20% throughout all curing periods. Acceleration in OPC hydration as well as pozzolanic reactions between silica particulate and OPC are responsible for this enhancement.51,52 The fine SF particles with huge surface area provide sites for the nucleation of OPC hydration products, hence promoting strength gain. In the case of pozzolanic reactions, a curing time of 3 to 4 days is typically required for these reactions (OPC-SF) to begin, according to previous research.20,53 The compressive strength of GHSC is enhanced over a curing period of 7 to 28 days as a result of the accelerated hydration of conventional OPC and due to the pozzolanic effects of SF. The formation of secondary C-S-H is the consequence of the interaction between (Ca (OH)2) produced during cement hydration and SiO2 in SF.54,55 This procedure increases the durability of the concrete by reducing the incidence of microcracks during periods of tension. In the same trend, adding steel and PET fibers improved the compressive strength of HSC and GHSC. The GHSC mixtures with a combination of (UPOFA-SF-ST-PET) registered the highest compressive strength of mixtures in GII and GIII at all curing periods. Hereby, the compressive strength of (M39) GHSC-U60 increased by 17%, 25% and 18% at ages of 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, related to control mix. This strength development was attributed to the effectiveness of binary binders (UPOFA and SF) in increasing bond formation between steel and PET fibers and other concrete ingredients. The tiny particle size and pozzolanic reactivity of UPOFA and SF reduced void volume and produced extra C-S-H gels, strengthening the aggregate-paste interfacial connection and increasing bonding capabilities with fibers. Adding steel and PET fibers may improve the fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced GHSC composites by limiting micro-crack formation under load, which is accomplished by forming a bridge network within the concrete microstructure.31,41,56
Further, particularly in the case of fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) mixes, the incorporation of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) has the potential to enhance the generation of secondary hydration products and be of assistance in the process of filling the pores that are produced at the interface of the fibers.57,58 A key contribution of SCMs such as SF to improving fiber-matrix interfacial characteristics is that the effectiveness of fibers within a concrete matrix relies heavily on the bond between the fibers and the matrix. Consequently, the load-bearing capacity was enhanced beyond the initial cracking threshold as the randomly dispersed fibers bonded effectively with the matrix, preventing crack propagation and specimen separation.59,60 In this study, the combination of SF-steel and PET fibers enhanced the compressive strength of UPOFA-GHSC at all ages, even with a high UPOFA content of 60%. The highest strength was observed at M27 (GHSC-U30-SF20-ST1-PET1).
The correlation between the variables UPOFA, SF, and steel as well as PET fibers with the compressive strength responses at 3, 7, and 28 days for GHSC mixtures was assessed using the RSM. The model was constructed using actual data. Table 5 summarizes the results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) conducted on the findings of the quadratic prediction model.
Table 5 shows the ANOVA results for the compressive strength parameters that were measured at 3, 7, and 28 days. The models were statistically significant at the 95% confidence level, as the P-values were less than 0.05, as indicated by the results. Furthermore, the substantial P-values for lack of fit (greater than 0.05) throughout each response suggest that the F-value was not significant, indicating a meaningful relationship between the variables and the process responses. Based on empirical correlation, the second-order polynomial illustrates the relationship between compressive strength at 3, 7, and 28 days and the parameters of UPOFA, SF, steel and PET fibers, as shown in the equation below:
Table 6 presents the model validation parameters for all responses. The ANOVA analysis demonstrates a high degree of confidence in the calculation of response efficiencies, represented as R2. The quadratic model demonstrates a commendable fit to the experimental data, as seen by a high R2 value close to one and a suitable correlation with the modified R2. This finding has also been confirmed by Ghafari et al. and Alani et al.61,62 Further, the coefficient of variation of a model is deemed repeatable if it is less than 10%.63 The repeatability of all models was satisfactory, as demonstrated in Table 6. To establish a favorable accord between the quadratic model and the actual data, the R2 value must be consistent with the adjusted R2. The ANOVA results of this study indicate a highly reliable level of confidence in evaluating response efficacy. The R2 and adjusted R2 values for compressive strength are (R2 = 0.9697 and adjusted R2 = 0.9539) at 3 days, (R2 = 0.9564 and adjusted R2 = 0.9337) at 7 days, and (R2 = 0.9674 and adjusted R2 = 0.9504) at 28 days. Furthermore, the precision values are 32.1, 24.92, and 29.41 at 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively; these values exceed 4, which is considered favorable. Moreover, there exists a substantial level of confidence in the standard deviation, which was much smaller than the mean values obtained. At 3 days, the compressive strength exhibits a standard deviation of 1.19 and a mean of 65.91; at 7 days, the standard deviation is around 1.88 with a mean of 74.26; and at 28 days, the standard deviations are 1.63 and 81.1. This finding implies that the variance analysis was both suitable and statistically significant. A decreasing standard deviation of the created model relative to its mean indicates that the test data exhibit less variability. The experimental data will provide a model with reduced uncertainty.10,64
Diagnostic charts are illustrated in Figures 9 and 10, which include the normal plot of residuals and a plot comparing expected and actual values. Moreover, the remaining points of the equality line are evenly distributed. The data fell below the line of equality, showing the effectiveness of the regression models. Besides, the scheme of the normal probability plot of all replies is based on the distribution of response model data points. The graphic indicates that the remaining points are nearly linear, which means that the model of the invasion is normally distributed. Thereby, the residuals are randomly spread in a straight line, the distribution of residuals is nearly normal, and the model uniforms the data quite well. These diagnostic plots are instrumental in evaluating the models’ appropriateness and efficacy.61 Thus, Figure 9 and Figure 10, illustrate the plots of the predicted vs. actual values and the normal plots of residuals for compressive strength at 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively. The data indicate a vital correlation between the model-generated compressive strength responses and the real values.
The perturbation graphs shown in Figures 11 (a), (b), and (c) illustrate how the variables affect compressive strength at early ages of 3, 7, and 28 days. The perturbation plots in the RSM highlight the influence of each parameter by showing how changes in these variables are related to variations in compressive strength. As a result, the combined effect of SF, ST, and PET substantially mitigates the compressive strength declines associated with UPOFA content. Particularly, the curvature of SF-ST-PET (B, C, and D) was sharper than the convex shape for UPOFA (A). That may indicate that SF-ST-PET variables affected compressive strength at all ages more than UPOFA. Thereby, UPOFA (A) exhibits increasing compressive strength at intermediate values and decreasing it at high levels. In contrast, SF (B), ST (C), and PET (D) show a linear positive correlation, leading to a consistent increase in compressive strength with higher levels.
In the numerical optimization process, the factors UPOFA, SF, ST, and PET fiber were assigned specific ranges. At the same time, the compressive strength responses at the ages of 3, 7, and 28 days were also defined within certain limits. The main objective of combining SF, ST, and PET is to achieve the highest compressive strength values at early ages for GHSC containing high amounts of UPOFA (30% and 60%). To identify the optimal conditions, factors based on the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) desirability criterion are utilized. The model equations were solved simultaneously to identify the process variables. At the optimal state, the compressive strengths achieved were 74.3 MPa, 88.65 MPa, and 95.95 MPa at the ages of 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively. This effect was achieved with 30% UPOFA, 20% SF, 1% ST, and 1% PET. As a result, the compressive strength of GHSC was optimized, leading to a desirability value of 0.98 based on the variable factors and responses, as illustrated in the graphical ramp from Figure 12.
This work used RSM to assess the feasibility of hybridizing different materials, including SF, steel, and PET fiber, to improve the significant decrease in compressive strength at early ages in GHSC containing substantial quantities of UPOFA. The following conclusions may be derived from the findings.
(1) The compressive strength of GHSC decreased as the percentage of UPOFA replaced with OPC increased from 30% to 60%. The lowest strength values were recorded at the ages of 3, 7, and 28 days with a 60% UPOFA concentration. The incorporation of hybrid materials namely as SF, steel fiber, and PET fiber enhances the compressive strength of 30% and 60% UPOFA-GHSC. At the ages of 3, 7, and 28 days, the GHSC mix of 30% UPOFA, 20% SF, 1% ST, and 1% PET (M27) demonstrated superior strength of about 76.4 MPa, 89.21 MPa, and 95.35 MPa, respectively. Furthermore, adding hybrid materials to the GHSC with a higher UPOFA of 60% increased compressive strength (M39) by 17%, 25%, and 18% at 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, when compared to the control mix.
(2) For the GHSC combination M27, which consists of 30% UPOFA, 20% SF, 1% ST, and 1% PET, RSM predicts the optimum conditions. The results of the ANOVA show that SF ST-PET has a greater effect on compressive strength than UPOFA. The experimental findings were well predicted by the quadratic regression, with R2 values of 0.9697, 0.9564, and 0.9674 for compressive strength at 3, 7 and 28 days, respectively. Hence, RSM might be a useful method for improving the mix design of green concrete with UPOFA, which reduces its strength at early ages. By lowering cement production energy consumption and waste volume, this method has the potential to increase the sustainability of concrete, make UPOFA more widely used in the industry, and lessen the negative environmental consequences.
The datasets supporting the findings of this study are openly available in the Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1799131765 under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
The authors acknowledge the University of Fallujah, Iraq, and the Civil Engineering Department at Universiti Sains Malaysia for their support in providing the materials and equipment used in this study.
- 1. Hamada H, Abed F, Alattar A, et al.: Influence of palm oil fuel ash on the high strength and ultra-high performance concrete: A comprehensive review. Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J. 2023; 45: 101492.
- 2. Colangelo F, Farina I, Petrillo A, et al.: Innovative Materials in Italy for Eco-Friendly and Sustainable Buildings.2021.
- 3. Abendeh R, Al Horani R, Rabayah HS, et al.: Effect of Steel Slag As Fine and Coarse Aggregate on Pore Structure and Freeze-thaw Resistance of High-strength Concrete Effect of Steel Slag As Fine and Coarse Aggregate on Pore Structure and Freeze-thaw Resistance of High-strength Concrete.2021.
- 4. Alani AH, Azmi M, Johari M, et al.: Optimizing Sustainable High-performance Green-concrete Characteristics with Minimum Cement Content: Experimental Program.2025; 19: 57–73.
- 5. Drzymała T, Jackiewicz-Rek W, Tomaszewski M, et al.: Effects of High Temperature on the Properties of High Performance Concrete (HPC). Procedia Eng. 2017; 172: 256–263.
- 6. Ansari Y, Husain D, Das UK, et al.: Ecological Footprint Assessment of Concrete: Partial Replacement of Cement by Water Treatment Sludge and Stone Dust.2023.
- 7. Zeyad AM, Megat MA, Tayeh BA, et al.: Pozzolanic reactivity of ultra fi ne palm oil fuel ash waste on strength and durability performances of high strength concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2017; 144: 511–522.
- 8. Megat Johari MA, Zeyad AM, Muhamad Bunnori N, et al.: Engineering and transport properties of high-strength green concrete containing high volume of ultrafine palm oil fuel ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012; 30: 281–288.
- 9. Bunnori NM, Alani AH, Noaman AT, et al.: Relationships between Compressive Strength and Transport Properties of Ultrahigh-Strength Green Concrete Utilizing Ternary-Blended Binder, A.2020; 32: 04020011.
- 10. Alani AH, Ghanim H, Azmi M, et al.: Mechanical properties of novel green high-strength fly ash concrete incorporating hemp fibers. J. Build. Eng. 2025; 111: 113500.
- 11. Hamada HM, Skariah B, Yahaya FM, et al.: Sustainable use of palm oil fuel ash as a supplementary cementitious material: A comprehensive review. J. Build. Eng. 2021; 40: 102286.
- 12. Zeyad AM, Azmi M, Johari M, et al.: Transport properties of palm oil fuel ash-based high-performance green concrete subjected to steam curing regimes. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022; 16: e01077. Publisher Full Text
- 13. Momeen M, Islam U, Mo KH, et al.: Durability properties of sustainable concrete containing high volume palm oil waste materials. J. Clean. Prod. 2016; 137: 167–177.
- 14. Zeyad AM, Johari MAM, Tayeh BA, et al.: Efficiency of treated and untreated palm oil fuel ash as a supplementary binder on engineering and fluid transport properties of high-strength concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016; 125: 1066–1079.
- 15. Hong WC, Mohammed BS, Abdulkadir I: Modeling and Optimizing the Effect of Palm Oil Fuel Ash on the Properties of Engineered Cementitious Composite.2023.
- 16. Zeyad AM, Zainol Z, Megat Johari MA, et al.: Impact of treated palm oil fuel ash inclusion on hardened properties of self-compacting concrete. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 2025; 10: 190.
- 17. Sata V, Jaturapitakkul C, Kiattikomol K: Influence of pozzolan from various by-product materials on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete.2007; 21: 1589–1598.
- 18. Azmi M, Johari M, Zeyad AM, et al.: Influence of Palm Oil Fuel Ash on Properties of High-Strength.2018; 24–34.
- 19. Brooks JJ, Johari MAM, Mazloom M: Effect of admixtures on the setting times of high-strength. Cement & Concrete Composites, Test. 2000; 22: 293–301.
- 20. Alani AH, Azmi M, Johari M, et al.: The Role of Silica Fume in Enhancing the Strength and Transport Properties of PET Fiber – Ultra High-Performance Concrete.2024; 13: 95–115.
- 21. Fallah S, Nematzadeh M: Mechanical properties and durability of high-strength concrete containing macro-polymeric and polypropylene fibers with nano-silica and silica fume. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017; 132: 170–187.
- 22. Köksal F, Beycioğlu A, Dobiszewska M: Optimization Based on Toughness and Splitting Tensile Strength of Steel-Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Incorporating Silica Fume Using Response Surface Method.2022.
- 23. Smarzewski P: Influence of silica fume on mechanical and fracture properties of high performance concrete. Procedia Struct. Integr. 2019; 17: 5–12.
- 24. Qin Y, Li Y, Zhang X, et al.: Constitutive model of polypropylene-fiber-fabric-reinforced concrete under uniaxial compression and index conversion of mechanical properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022; 347: 128508.
- 25. Zhang P, Wang C, Gao Z, et al.: A review on fracture properties of steel fiber reinforced concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2023; 67: 105975.
- 26. Magbool HM, Zeyad AM: The effect of various steel fibers and volcanic pumice powder on fracture characteristics of Self-Compacting concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021; 312: 125444.
- 27. Lee C, Kim H: Cement and Concrete Research Orientation factor and number of fi bers at failure plane in ring-type steel fi ber reinforced concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010; 40: 810–819.
- 28. Zhang P, Wei S, Wu J, et al.: Investigation of mechanical properties of PVA fiber-reinforced cementitious composites under the coupling effect of wet-thermal and chloride salt environment. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022; 17: e01325. Publisher Full Text
- 29. Li, et al.: Impact resistance of steel fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete (SCC) at high strain rates.2021; 38.
- 30. Mezzal SK, Al-azzawi Z, Najim KB: Effect of discarded steel fibers on impact resistance, flexural toughness and fracture energy of high-strength self-compacting concrete exposed to elevated temperatures. Fire Saf. J. 2021; 121: 103271.
- 31. He W, Kong X, Fu Y, et al.: Experimental investigation on the mechanical properties and microstructure of hybrid fiber reinforced recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020; 261: 120488.
- 32. Feng J, Yin G, Tuo H, et al.: Uniaxial compressive behavior of hook-end steel and macro-polypropylene hybrid fibers reinforced recycled aggregate concrete Uniaxial compressive behavior of hook-end steel and macro-polypropylene hybrid fibers reinforced recycled aggregate concrete.2025.
- 33. Pelisser F, Barros A, Santos S, et al.: Effect of the addition of synthetic fibers to concrete thin slabs on plastic shrinkage cracking. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010; 24: 2171–2176.
- 34. Minhaj S, Kazmi S, Junaid M, et al.: Effect of macro-synthetic fibers on the fracture energy and mechanical behavior of recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018; 189: 857–868.
- 35. Peng Q, Chen B, Lu Q, et al.: Effect of steel-waste PET hybrid fiber on properties of recycled aggregate concrete based on response surface methodology. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023; 397: 132448.
- 36. Alani AH, Bunnori NM, Noaman AT, et al.: Durability performance of a novel ultra-high-performance PET green concrete (UHPPGC). Constr. Build. Mater. 2019; 209: 395–405.
- 37. Al-Hadithi AI, Hilal NN: The possibility of enhancing some properties of self-compacting concrete by adding waste plastic fibers. J. Build. Eng. 2016; 8: 20–28.
- 38. Hilal N, Tawfik TA, Nayef S, et al.: The effect of waste medical radiology as fiber reinforcement on the behavior of eco - efficient self - compacting concrete. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022; 29: 49253–49266. Publisher Full Text
- 39. Hilal N, Tawfik TA, Edan HH, et al.: The mechanical and durability behaviour of sustainable self-compacting concrete partially contained waste plastic as fine aggregate. Aust. J. Civ. Eng. 2023; 21: 151–166.
- 40. Ramadevi KK, Manju R: Experimental Investigation on the Properties of Concrete With Plastic PET (Bottle) Fibres as Fine Aggregates. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2012; 2: 42–46.
- 41. Alani AH, Azmi M, Johari M, et al.: Effect of the incorporation of PET fiber and ternary blended binder on the flexural and tensile behaviour of ultra-high performance green concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022; 331: 127306. Publisher Full Text
- 42. ASTM C 150, ASTM C 150: Standard specification for Portland cement. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. 2001; 04(01): pp. 149–155. (2001).
- 43. Nawy EG: Fundamentals of high-performance concrete. John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
- 44. ASTM-C494/C494M, Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete. 2001; 04: 1–9.
- 45. BS, British Standard Institution: BS EN 12390-3, Testing Hardened Concrete. Compressive Strength of Test Specimens. London: BSI; 2002.
- 46. Liew YX, Saad SA, Anand N, et al.: Evaluating the impact of reducing POFA’ s particle fineness on its pozzolanic reactivity and mortar strength. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Eng. 2024; 19. Publisher Full Text
- 47. Alani AH, Tayeh BA, Johari MAM, et al.: Optimizing strength behavior of sustainable ultra high performance green concrete with minimum cement content using response surface method. J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 2024; 9. Publisher Full Text
- 48. Eid HA, Amin M, Tahwia AM: Properties of ultra-high-performance concrete incorporating palm oil fuel Ash as an eco-filler.2025.
- 49. Hamada HM, Al-attar AA, Yahaya FM, et al.: Effect of high-volume ultrafine palm oil fuel ash on the engineering and transport properties of concrete. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2020; 12: e00318. Publisher Full Text
- 50. Al-kerttani OMG, Hilal N, Mahmoud S, et al.: Results in Engineering Durability and hardened characteristics of cement mortar incorporating waste plastic and Polypropylene exposed to MgSO 4 attack. Results Eng. 2024; 24: 103310.
- 51. Li L, Sun W, Feng Z, et al.: Hydration kinetics and apparent activation energy of cement pastes containing high silica fume content at lower curing temperature. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024; 435: 136881.
- 52. Xi J, Liu J, Yang K, et al.: Role of silica fume on hydration and strength development of ultra-high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022; 338: 127600.
- 53. Ahmad J, Abid SR, Arbili MM, et al.: A Review on Sustainable Concrete with the Partially Substitutions of Silica Fume as a Cementitious Material.2022.
- 54. Zhang Y, Cao S, Chang J, et al.: Influence of seawater on the microstructure of calcium-silicate-hydrate (C-S-H) gels with varying Ca/Si ratios based on alite-silicon dioxide system. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2025; 164: 106251.
- 55. Azizi M, Samimi K: Effect of silica fume on Self-compacting Earth Concrete: Compressive strength, durability and microstructural studies. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025; 472: 140815.
- 56. Chun B, Yoo DY: Hybrid effect of macro and micro steel fibers on the pullout and tensile behaviors of ultra-high-performance concrete. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019; 162: 344–360.
- 57. Boomibalan S: Experimental investigations on mechanical performance, synergy assessment, and microstructure of pozzolanic and non-pozzolanic hybrid steel fiber reinforced concrete.2024.
- 58. Hilal NN, Alobaidi YM, Al-hadithi AI: Viability of cellulose nanofibre powder and silica fume in self- compacting concrete rheology, hardened properties, and microstructure. J. King Saud Univ. - Eng. Sci. 2024; 36: 199–206.
- 59. Dyczko A, Ben Kahla N, Atig M: Compressive Strength of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Employing Supervised Machine Learning Techniques.2022.
- 60. Fraz CMV, Barros JAO, Bogas JA: Durability of Recycled Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete in Chloride Environment.2019.
- 61. Ghafari S, Abdul H, Hasnain M, et al.: Application of response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize coagulation – flocculation treatment of leachate using poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) and alum.2009; 163: 650–656.
- 62. Alani AH, Azmi M, Johari M, et al.: Application of response surface methodology for optimizing the compressive strength of green ultra high strength concrete using silica fume. J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 2024; 8: 1–13.
- 63. Aldahdooh MAA, Jamrah A, Alnuaimi A, et al.: Influence of various plastics-waste aggregates on properties of normal concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2018; 17: 13–22.
- 64. Hamada HM, Al-attar A, Shi J, et al.: Optimization of sustainable concrete characteristics incorporating palm oil clinker and nano-palm oil fuel ash using response surface methodology. Powder Technol. 2023; 413: 118054.
- 65. Alani AH, et al.: Optimizing Early Compressive Strength of Ultrafine POFA-Based Green HSC: An Experimental and Modeling Approach with Silica Fume and Hybrid Fibers. F1000 Res. 2025.
Author details Author details
1 Department of Engineering Affairs, University of Fallujah, Al-Fallujah, Al Anbar Governorate, Iraq
2 University of Bilad AL-Rafidain, Baqubah, Iraq
3 University of Fallujah, Scientific Affairs Department, Fallujah, Iraq
4 Universiti Sains Malaysia School of Civil Engineering, Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
5 Technical Engineering College, Al-Esraa University, Baghdad, Iraq
2 University of Bilad AL-Rafidain, Baqubah, Iraq
3 University of Fallujah, Scientific Affairs Department, Fallujah, Iraq
4 Universiti Sains Malaysia School of Civil Engineering, Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
5 Technical Engineering College, Al-Esraa University, Baghdad, Iraq
Aktham H Alani
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing
Doaa Ahmed
Roles: Methodology, Resources, Validation
Roles: Methodology, Resources, Validation
Qasim A. Al-obaidi
Roles: Methodology, Resources, Software
Roles: Methodology, Resources, Software
Nahla Hilal
Roles: Data Curation, Resources, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation
Roles: Data Curation, Resources, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation
Megat Azmi Megat Johari
Roles: Data Curation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation
Roles: Data Curation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation
Hayder Sadeq Al-Aasam
Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources
Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources
Competing interests
No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Article Versions (3)
Copyright
© 2026 Alani AH et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
metrics
| Views | Downloads | |
|---|---|---|
| F1000Research | - | - |
| PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. | - | - |
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Alani AH, Ahmed D, Al-obaidi QA et al. Optimizing Early Compressive Strength of Ultrafine POFA-Based Green HSC: An Experimental and Modeling Approach with Silica Fume and Hybrid Fibers [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2026, 15:103 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.175237.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.
Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 22 Jan 2026 Views
0
How to cite this report:
Haruehansapong S. Reviewer Report For: Optimizing Early Compressive Strength of Ultrafine POFA-Based Green HSC: An Experimental and Modeling Approach with Silica Fume and Hybrid Fibers [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2026, 15:103 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.193200.r456473) The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/15-103/v1#referee-response-456473
https://f1000research.com/articles/15-103/v1#referee-response-456473
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation.
Reviewer Report 11 Feb 2026
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 0
The manuscript presents a well-structured experimental and modeling study on the optimization of early-age compressive strength of ultrafine POFA-based green high-strength concrete. The experimental program is sound, and the statistical modeling approach is appropriate. The conclusions are generally supported by ... Continue reading I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close
The manuscript presents a well-structured experimental and modeling study on the optimization of early-age compressive strength of ultrafine POFA-based green high-strength concrete. The experimental program is sound, and the statistical modeling approach is appropriate. The conclusions are generally supported by the presented evidence.
However, several minor but important revisions are recommended to improve clarity, conciseness, and engineering relevance before final approval.
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or statistical optimization.
2. Abstract
However, several minor but important revisions are recommended to improve clarity, conciseness, and engineering relevance before final approval.
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or statistical optimization.
2. Abstract
- Clearly explain why early-age compressive strength is critical, particularly for UPOFA-based concrete.
- Explicitly state the application scope (non-structural or low-load applications).
- Separate experimental findings from modeling outcomes more clearly.
- Suggested action:
- Add one sentence clarifying application limitations.
- Revise for conciseness.
- Reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts.
- Strengthen the research gap, particularly regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
- Clearly distinguish this study from previous related works.
- Consider adding a summary table describing the role and expected effect of each material (UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, PET fiber).
- Justify why steel fiber and PET fiber contents were fixed at specific values.
- Briefly justify the selection of CCD over other RSM designs.
- Reduce narrative repetition of numerical values already presented in figures.
- Strengthen microstructural explanations linking UPOFA dilution, silica fume nucleation, and fiber bridging effects.
- Briefly explain why post-hoc statistical tests were not conducted.
- Clearly distinguish statistical significance from engineering significance.
- Add a short subsection explicitly addressing engineering applications of the optimized mix.
- Clearly state where and how the optimized concrete can be practically used.
- Avoid repeating detailed numerical results.
- Explicitly acknowledge study limitations (laboratory scale, early-age focus).
- Provide a clear direction for future work.
-
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
-
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
-
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
-
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
-
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
-
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: concrete, materials, cement
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Haruehansapong S. Reviewer Report For: Optimizing Early Compressive Strength of Ultrafine POFA-Based Green HSC: An Experimental and Modeling Approach with Silica Fume and Hybrid Fibers [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2026, 15:103 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.193200.r456473)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/15-103/v1#referee-response-456473
https://f1000research.com/articles/15-103/v1#referee-response-456473
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
- Author Response 05 May 2026Aktham Hatem Qasim, Department of Engineering Affairs, University of Fallujah, Al-Fallujah, Iraq05 May 2026Author ResponseResponse to Reviewer Comments
The authors thank the reviewer for their careful reading and constructive comments below. We are very pleased to receive the reviewer’s recognition of the research work ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer Comments
The authors thank the reviewer for their careful reading and constructive comments below. We are very pleased to receive the reviewer’s recognition of the research work in this paper. We believe that we have addressed all of the comments through our responses below, as well as in the text of the manuscript when appropriate.
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or statistical optimization.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
2. Abstract
Clearly explain why early-age compressive strength is critical, particularly for UPOFA-based concrete.
Explicitly state the application scope (non-structural or low-load applications).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
Moreover, the replacement rates of HSGC are probably high in POFA, which is constrained in the areas of the application where the removal of the formwork or pre-stressing of the structures is required in a very short period of time, and the high early-age strengths are required. 16
Separate experimental findings from modeling outcomes more clearly.
Suggested action:
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion, as shown, experimental findings and modeling outcomes are presented separately.
Add one sentence clarifying application limitations.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment (Noted, done). However, somehow these studies suggested the limitation of the POFA used because the highest was limited. The compressive strength was determined at a POFA replacement level of 20%, and the ultimate highest compressive strength of 28-days compressive strength achieved with the concretes that used POFA ranged between 60 and 86 MPa. 17, 18
3. Introduction
Reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, done, within introduction part).
Strengthen the research gap, particularly regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the research significance subsection already addresses the gap regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Clearly distinguish this study from previous related works.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the Introduction already highlights the study’s novelty and clearly distinguishes it from previous works.
4.1 Materials Characterization
Consider adding a summary table describing the role and expected effect of each material (UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, PET fiber).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s excellent suggestion. (Noted, done, see Table 2).
4.2 Experimental Design and RSM
Justify why the steel fiber and PET fiber contents were fixed at specific values.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done). The contents of the steel and PET fibers were set to 1% volume, which is consistent with previous studies reporting that this amount has improved mechanical performance, crack control, and ductility whilst maintaining workability.21, 36
Briefly justify the selection of CCD over other RSM designs.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted, done). CCD technique is favored to the full factorial and three-level design as it estimates the linear, quadratic and interaction effects with minimum tests, which will lead to a good model fitting, greater accuracy in prediction, reduced amount of residual error, and a high value of R2, that could permit the creation of three-dimensional response surfaces with great reliability. Consequently, it has commonly been considered as the best experimental design to investigate the second-order response models.4, 15
5.1 Compressive Strength Results
Reduce narrative repetition of numerical values already presented in figures.
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. Due to the high number of mixes and material changes, numerical values are supplied in the text in addition to tables and figures to assist the reader in understanding and following the patterns in the results.
Strengthen microstructural explanations linking UPOFA dilution, silica fume nucleation, and fiber bridging effects.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done)
The compressive strength of GHSC is enhanced over a curing period of 7 to 28 days as a result of the accelerated hydration of conventional OPC and due to the pozzolanic effects of SF. The formation of secondary C-S-H is the consequence of the interaction between (Ca(OH)₂) produced during cement hydration and SiO₂ in SF 61,62. This procedure increases the durability of the concrete by reducing the incidence of microcracks during periods of tension. In the same trend, adding steel and PET fibers improved the compressive strength of HSC and GHSC. The GHSC mixtures with a combination of (UPOFA-SF-ST-PET) registered the highest compressive strength of mixtures in GII and GIII at all curing periods. Hereby, the compressive strength of (M39) GHSC-U60 increased by 17%,25% and 18% at ages of 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, related to control mix. This strength development was attributed to the effectiveness of binary binders (UPOFA and SF) in increasing bond formation between steel and PET fibers and other concrete ingredients. The tiny particle size and pozzolanic reactivity of UPOFA and SF reduced void volume and produced extra C-S-H gels, strengthening the aggregate-paste interfacial connection and increasing bonding capabilities with fibers. Adding steel and PET fibers may improve the fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced GHSC composites by limiting micro-crack formation under load, which is accomplished by forming a bridge network within the concrete microstructure33,34,64
5.2 Statistical Analysis and Modeling
Briefly explain why post-hoc statistical tests were not conducted.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Therefore, Post-hoc tests were not conducted as the principal analysis showed that the compressive strength increased significantly due to a combination of silica, steel fibers, and PET fibers, so the extra post-hoc comparisons were not necessary.
.Clearly distinguish statistical significance from engineering significance.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted).
The practical relevance of these variations on material performance or structural design is reflected in engineering significance, whereas statistical significance shows that observed differences are unlikely to be the result of chance (e.g., p<0.05). Despite having little engineering significance, certain outcomes could be statistically significant.
6. Optimization Results and Practical Implications
Add a short subsection explicitly addressing engineering applications of the optimized mix.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. The blending of fibers and pozzolanic substances will offer a sure way of minimizing the maintenance and the service life of the concrete structures.
Suggested action:
Clearly state where and how the optimized concrete can be practically used.
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion.
7. Conclusions
Avoid repeating detailed numerical results.
Explicitly acknowledge study limitations (laboratory scale, early-age focus).
Provide a clear direction for future work
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Further, this study primarily focused on early-age mechanical ability, conducted within a controlled civil engineering laboratory and environment. Consequently, additional future works are required to investigate durability, long-term performance, and comprehensive structural validation.Response to Reviewer CommentsCompeting Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Close
The authors thank the reviewer for their careful reading and constructive comments below. We are very pleased to receive the reviewer’s recognition of the research work in this paper. We believe that we have addressed all of the comments through our responses below, as well as in the text of the manuscript when appropriate.
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or statistical optimization.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
2. Abstract
Clearly explain why early-age compressive strength is critical, particularly for UPOFA-based concrete.
Explicitly state the application scope (non-structural or low-load applications).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
Moreover, the replacement rates of HSGC are probably high in POFA, which is constrained in the areas of the application where the removal of the formwork or pre-stressing of the structures is required in a very short period of time, and the high early-age strengths are required. 16
Separate experimental findings from modeling outcomes more clearly.
Suggested action:
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion, as shown, experimental findings and modeling outcomes are presented separately.
Add one sentence clarifying application limitations.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment (Noted, done). However, somehow these studies suggested the limitation of the POFA used because the highest was limited. The compressive strength was determined at a POFA replacement level of 20%, and the ultimate highest compressive strength of 28-days compressive strength achieved with the concretes that used POFA ranged between 60 and 86 MPa. 17, 18
3. Introduction
Reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, done, within introduction part).
Strengthen the research gap, particularly regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the research significance subsection already addresses the gap regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Clearly distinguish this study from previous related works.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the Introduction already highlights the study’s novelty and clearly distinguishes it from previous works.
4.1 Materials Characterization
Consider adding a summary table describing the role and expected effect of each material (UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, PET fiber).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s excellent suggestion. (Noted, done, see Table 2).
4.2 Experimental Design and RSM
Justify why the steel fiber and PET fiber contents were fixed at specific values.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done). The contents of the steel and PET fibers were set to 1% volume, which is consistent with previous studies reporting that this amount has improved mechanical performance, crack control, and ductility whilst maintaining workability.21, 36
Briefly justify the selection of CCD over other RSM designs.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted, done). CCD technique is favored to the full factorial and three-level design as it estimates the linear, quadratic and interaction effects with minimum tests, which will lead to a good model fitting, greater accuracy in prediction, reduced amount of residual error, and a high value of R2, that could permit the creation of three-dimensional response surfaces with great reliability. Consequently, it has commonly been considered as the best experimental design to investigate the second-order response models.4, 15
5.1 Compressive Strength Results
Reduce narrative repetition of numerical values already presented in figures.
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. Due to the high number of mixes and material changes, numerical values are supplied in the text in addition to tables and figures to assist the reader in understanding and following the patterns in the results.
Strengthen microstructural explanations linking UPOFA dilution, silica fume nucleation, and fiber bridging effects.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done)
The compressive strength of GHSC is enhanced over a curing period of 7 to 28 days as a result of the accelerated hydration of conventional OPC and due to the pozzolanic effects of SF. The formation of secondary C-S-H is the consequence of the interaction between (Ca(OH)₂) produced during cement hydration and SiO₂ in SF 61,62. This procedure increases the durability of the concrete by reducing the incidence of microcracks during periods of tension. In the same trend, adding steel and PET fibers improved the compressive strength of HSC and GHSC. The GHSC mixtures with a combination of (UPOFA-SF-ST-PET) registered the highest compressive strength of mixtures in GII and GIII at all curing periods. Hereby, the compressive strength of (M39) GHSC-U60 increased by 17%,25% and 18% at ages of 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, related to control mix. This strength development was attributed to the effectiveness of binary binders (UPOFA and SF) in increasing bond formation between steel and PET fibers and other concrete ingredients. The tiny particle size and pozzolanic reactivity of UPOFA and SF reduced void volume and produced extra C-S-H gels, strengthening the aggregate-paste interfacial connection and increasing bonding capabilities with fibers. Adding steel and PET fibers may improve the fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced GHSC composites by limiting micro-crack formation under load, which is accomplished by forming a bridge network within the concrete microstructure33,34,64
5.2 Statistical Analysis and Modeling
Briefly explain why post-hoc statistical tests were not conducted.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Therefore, Post-hoc tests were not conducted as the principal analysis showed that the compressive strength increased significantly due to a combination of silica, steel fibers, and PET fibers, so the extra post-hoc comparisons were not necessary.
.Clearly distinguish statistical significance from engineering significance.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted).
The practical relevance of these variations on material performance or structural design is reflected in engineering significance, whereas statistical significance shows that observed differences are unlikely to be the result of chance (e.g., p<0.05). Despite having little engineering significance, certain outcomes could be statistically significant.
6. Optimization Results and Practical Implications
Add a short subsection explicitly addressing engineering applications of the optimized mix.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. The blending of fibers and pozzolanic substances will offer a sure way of minimizing the maintenance and the service life of the concrete structures.
Suggested action:
Clearly state where and how the optimized concrete can be practically used.
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion.
7. Conclusions
Avoid repeating detailed numerical results.
Explicitly acknowledge study limitations (laboratory scale, early-age focus).
Provide a clear direction for future work
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Further, this study primarily focused on early-age mechanical ability, conducted within a controlled civil engineering laboratory and environment. Consequently, additional future works are required to investigate durability, long-term performance, and comprehensive structural validation. - Author Response 05 May 2026Aktham Hatem Qasim, Department of Engineering Affairs, University of Fallujah, Al-Fallujah, Iraq05 May 2026Author ResponseReviewer 1
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or ... Continue reading Reviewer 1
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or statistical optimization.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). “Optimizing Early Compressive Strength of Ultrafine POFA-Based Green HSC: An Experimental and RSM Approach with Silica Fume and Hybrid Fibers”
2. Abstract
Clearly explain why early-age compressive strength is critical, particularly for UPOFA-based concrete.
Explicitly state the application scope (non-structural or low-load applications).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
Moreover, the replacement rates of HSGC are probably high in POFA, which is constrained in the areas of the application where the removal of the formwork or pre-stressing of the structures is required in a very short period of time, and the high early-age strengths are required. 16
Separate experimental findings from modeling outcomes more clearly.
Suggested action:
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion, as shown, experimental findings and modeling outcomes are presented separately. (See, subsection 3.2: Mathematical modeling and statistical analysis results.
Add one sentence clarifying application limitations.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment (Noted, done). However, somehow these studies suggested the limitation of the POFA used because the highest was limited. The compressive strength was determined at a POFA replacement level of 20%, and the ultimate highest compressive strength of 28-days compressive strength achieved with the concretes that used POFA ranged between 60 and 86 MPa. 17, 18
3. Introduction
Reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the manuscript has been revised to reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts, particularly in the Introduction section.)
Strengthen the research gap, particularly regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, done. See subsection 1.1: research significance which already addresses the gap regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.)
Clearly distinguish this study from previous related works.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the Introduction has been revised to more clearly highlight the novelty of this study and distinguish it from previous related work.)
4.1 Materials Characterization
Consider adding a summary table describing the role and expected effect of each material (UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, PET fiber).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s excellent suggestion. (Noted, done. A summary table has been added (Table 2) to clearly describe the role and expected effect of each material, including UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, and PET fiber.).
4.2 Experimental Design and RSM
Justify why the steel fiber and PET fiber contents were fixed at specific values.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done). The contents of the steel and PET fibers were set to 1% volume, which is consistent with previous studies reporting that this amount has improved mechanical performance, crack control, and ductility whilst maintaining workability.21, 36. Further, studies done before have indicated that the strongest effect of these types of fibers, especially when combined with pozzolanic substances, is at this ratio. In turn, selecting 0% and 1% was sufficient to capture the main effect of the fiber addition and avoid irrelevant intermediate levels, which would not yield much different results.
Briefly justify the selection of CCD over other RSM designs.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted, done). CCD technique is favored to the full factorial and three-level design as it estimates the linear, quadratic and interaction effects with minimum tests, which will lead to a good model fitting, greater accuracy in prediction, reduced amount of residual error, and a high value of R2, that could permit the creation of three-dimensional response surfaces with great reliability. Consequently, it has commonly been considered as the best experimental design to investigate the second-order response models.4, 15
5.1 Compressive Strength Results
Reduce narrative repetition of numerical values already presented in figures.
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. Due to the high number of mixes and material changes, numerical values are supplied in the text in addition to tables and figures to assist the reader in understanding and following the patterns in the results.
Strengthen microstructural explanations linking UPOFA dilution, silica fume nucleation, and fiber bridging effects.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done)
The compressive strength of GHSC is enhanced over a curing period of 7 to 28 days as a result of the accelerated hydration of conventional OPC and due to the pozzolanic effects of SF. The formation of secondary C-S-H is the consequence of the interaction between (Ca(OH)₂) produced during cement hydration and SiO₂ in SF 61,62. This procedure increases the durability of the concrete by reducing the incidence of microcracks during periods of tension. In the same trend, adding steel and PET fibers improved the compressive strength of HSC and GHSC. The GHSC mixtures with a combination of (UPOFA-SF-ST-PET) registered the highest compressive strength of mixtures in GII and GIII at all curing periods. Hereby, the compressive strength of (M39) GHSC-U60 increased by 17%,25% and 18% at ages of 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, related to control mix. This strength development was attributed to the effectiveness of binary binders (UPOFA and SF) in increasing bond formation between steel and PET fibers and other concrete ingredients. The tiny particle size and pozzolanic reactivity of UPOFA and SF reduced void volume and produced extra C-S-H gels, strengthening the aggregate-paste interfacial connection and increasing bonding capabilities with fibers. Adding steel and PET fibers may improve the fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced GHSC composites by limiting micro-crack formation under load, which is accomplished by forming a bridge network within the concrete microstructure33,34,64
5.2 Statistical Analysis and Modeling
Briefly explain why post-hoc statistical tests were not conducted.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Therefore, Post-hoc tests were not conducted as the principal analysis showed that the compressive strength increased significantly due to a combination of silica, steel fibers, and PET fibers, so the extra post-hoc comparisons were not necessary.
.Clearly distinguish statistical significance from engineering significance.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted).
The practical relevance of these variations on material performance or structural design is reflected in engineering significance, whereas statistical significance shows that observed differences are unlikely to be the result of chance (e.g., p<0.05). Despite having little engineering significance, certain outcomes could be statistically significant.
6. Optimization Results and Practical Implications
Add a short subsection explicitly addressing engineering applications of the optimized mix.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. The blending of fibers and pozzolanic substances will offer a sure way of minimizing the maintenance and the service life of the concrete structures.
Suggested action:
Clearly state where and how the optimized concrete can be practically used.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion. (See subsection 3.4)
There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. Thus, related to current study the optimized GHSC is applicable in structural elements, which include beams, columns, and precast elements, especially in settings that demand high strength and durability.
7. Conclusions
Avoid repeating detailed numerical results.
Explicitly acknowledge study limitations (laboratory scale, early-age focus).
Provide a clear direction for future work
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done, the future work paragraph has been added at the end of the Conclusion section). Future works are required in the optimization of GHSC by RSM in terms of long-term durability performance in diverse environmental factors, such as chloride penetration, sulfate attack, carbonation, water absorption, and permeability. Moreover, machine learning in combination with RSM can make its predictions more accurate and create a more resilient multi-objective optimization model that will consider the mechanical and durability characteristics of sustainable concrete design.Reviewer 1Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or statistical optimization.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). “Optimizing Early Compressive Strength of Ultrafine POFA-Based Green HSC: An Experimental and RSM Approach with Silica Fume and Hybrid Fibers”
2. Abstract
Clearly explain why early-age compressive strength is critical, particularly for UPOFA-based concrete.
Explicitly state the application scope (non-structural or low-load applications).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
Moreover, the replacement rates of HSGC are probably high in POFA, which is constrained in the areas of the application where the removal of the formwork or pre-stressing of the structures is required in a very short period of time, and the high early-age strengths are required. 16
Separate experimental findings from modeling outcomes more clearly.
Suggested action:
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion, as shown, experimental findings and modeling outcomes are presented separately. (See, subsection 3.2: Mathematical modeling and statistical analysis results.
Add one sentence clarifying application limitations.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment (Noted, done). However, somehow these studies suggested the limitation of the POFA used because the highest was limited. The compressive strength was determined at a POFA replacement level of 20%, and the ultimate highest compressive strength of 28-days compressive strength achieved with the concretes that used POFA ranged between 60 and 86 MPa. 17, 18
3. Introduction
Reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the manuscript has been revised to reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts, particularly in the Introduction section.)
Strengthen the research gap, particularly regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, done. See subsection 1.1: research significance which already addresses the gap regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.)
Clearly distinguish this study from previous related works.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the Introduction has been revised to more clearly highlight the novelty of this study and distinguish it from previous related work.)
4.1 Materials Characterization
Consider adding a summary table describing the role and expected effect of each material (UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, PET fiber).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s excellent suggestion. (Noted, done. A summary table has been added (Table 2) to clearly describe the role and expected effect of each material, including UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, and PET fiber.).
4.2 Experimental Design and RSM
Justify why the steel fiber and PET fiber contents were fixed at specific values.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done). The contents of the steel and PET fibers were set to 1% volume, which is consistent with previous studies reporting that this amount has improved mechanical performance, crack control, and ductility whilst maintaining workability.21, 36. Further, studies done before have indicated that the strongest effect of these types of fibers, especially when combined with pozzolanic substances, is at this ratio. In turn, selecting 0% and 1% was sufficient to capture the main effect of the fiber addition and avoid irrelevant intermediate levels, which would not yield much different results.
Briefly justify the selection of CCD over other RSM designs.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted, done). CCD technique is favored to the full factorial and three-level design as it estimates the linear, quadratic and interaction effects with minimum tests, which will lead to a good model fitting, greater accuracy in prediction, reduced amount of residual error, and a high value of R2, that could permit the creation of three-dimensional response surfaces with great reliability. Consequently, it has commonly been considered as the best experimental design to investigate the second-order response models.4, 15
5.1 Compressive Strength Results
Reduce narrative repetition of numerical values already presented in figures.
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. Due to the high number of mixes and material changes, numerical values are supplied in the text in addition to tables and figures to assist the reader in understanding and following the patterns in the results.
Strengthen microstructural explanations linking UPOFA dilution, silica fume nucleation, and fiber bridging effects.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done)
The compressive strength of GHSC is enhanced over a curing period of 7 to 28 days as a result of the accelerated hydration of conventional OPC and due to the pozzolanic effects of SF. The formation of secondary C-S-H is the consequence of the interaction between (Ca(OH)₂) produced during cement hydration and SiO₂ in SF 61,62. This procedure increases the durability of the concrete by reducing the incidence of microcracks during periods of tension. In the same trend, adding steel and PET fibers improved the compressive strength of HSC and GHSC. The GHSC mixtures with a combination of (UPOFA-SF-ST-PET) registered the highest compressive strength of mixtures in GII and GIII at all curing periods. Hereby, the compressive strength of (M39) GHSC-U60 increased by 17%,25% and 18% at ages of 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, related to control mix. This strength development was attributed to the effectiveness of binary binders (UPOFA and SF) in increasing bond formation between steel and PET fibers and other concrete ingredients. The tiny particle size and pozzolanic reactivity of UPOFA and SF reduced void volume and produced extra C-S-H gels, strengthening the aggregate-paste interfacial connection and increasing bonding capabilities with fibers. Adding steel and PET fibers may improve the fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced GHSC composites by limiting micro-crack formation under load, which is accomplished by forming a bridge network within the concrete microstructure33,34,64
5.2 Statistical Analysis and Modeling
Briefly explain why post-hoc statistical tests were not conducted.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Therefore, Post-hoc tests were not conducted as the principal analysis showed that the compressive strength increased significantly due to a combination of silica, steel fibers, and PET fibers, so the extra post-hoc comparisons were not necessary.
.Clearly distinguish statistical significance from engineering significance.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted).
The practical relevance of these variations on material performance or structural design is reflected in engineering significance, whereas statistical significance shows that observed differences are unlikely to be the result of chance (e.g., p<0.05). Despite having little engineering significance, certain outcomes could be statistically significant.
6. Optimization Results and Practical Implications
Add a short subsection explicitly addressing engineering applications of the optimized mix.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. The blending of fibers and pozzolanic substances will offer a sure way of minimizing the maintenance and the service life of the concrete structures.
Suggested action:
Clearly state where and how the optimized concrete can be practically used.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion. (See subsection 3.4)
There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. Thus, related to current study the optimized GHSC is applicable in structural elements, which include beams, columns, and precast elements, especially in settings that demand high strength and durability.
7. Conclusions
Avoid repeating detailed numerical results.
Explicitly acknowledge study limitations (laboratory scale, early-age focus).
Provide a clear direction for future work
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done, the future work paragraph has been added at the end of the Conclusion section). Future works are required in the optimization of GHSC by RSM in terms of long-term durability performance in diverse environmental factors, such as chloride penetration, sulfate attack, carbonation, water absorption, and permeability. Moreover, machine learning in combination with RSM can make its predictions more accurate and create a more resilient multi-objective optimization model that will consider the mechanical and durability characteristics of sustainable concrete design.
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
- Author Response 05 May 2026Aktham Hatem Qasim, Department of Engineering Affairs, University of Fallujah, Al-Fallujah, Iraq05 May 2026Author ResponseResponse to Reviewer Comments
The authors thank the reviewer for their careful reading and constructive comments below. We are very pleased to receive the reviewer’s recognition of the research work ... Continue reading Response to Reviewer Comments
The authors thank the reviewer for their careful reading and constructive comments below. We are very pleased to receive the reviewer’s recognition of the research work in this paper. We believe that we have addressed all of the comments through our responses below, as well as in the text of the manuscript when appropriate.
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or statistical optimization.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
2. Abstract
Clearly explain why early-age compressive strength is critical, particularly for UPOFA-based concrete.
Explicitly state the application scope (non-structural or low-load applications).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
Moreover, the replacement rates of HSGC are probably high in POFA, which is constrained in the areas of the application where the removal of the formwork or pre-stressing of the structures is required in a very short period of time, and the high early-age strengths are required. 16
Separate experimental findings from modeling outcomes more clearly.
Suggested action:
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion, as shown, experimental findings and modeling outcomes are presented separately.
Add one sentence clarifying application limitations.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment (Noted, done). However, somehow these studies suggested the limitation of the POFA used because the highest was limited. The compressive strength was determined at a POFA replacement level of 20%, and the ultimate highest compressive strength of 28-days compressive strength achieved with the concretes that used POFA ranged between 60 and 86 MPa. 17, 18
3. Introduction
Reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, done, within introduction part).
Strengthen the research gap, particularly regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the research significance subsection already addresses the gap regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Clearly distinguish this study from previous related works.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the Introduction already highlights the study’s novelty and clearly distinguishes it from previous works.
4.1 Materials Characterization
Consider adding a summary table describing the role and expected effect of each material (UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, PET fiber).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s excellent suggestion. (Noted, done, see Table 2).
4.2 Experimental Design and RSM
Justify why the steel fiber and PET fiber contents were fixed at specific values.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done). The contents of the steel and PET fibers were set to 1% volume, which is consistent with previous studies reporting that this amount has improved mechanical performance, crack control, and ductility whilst maintaining workability.21, 36
Briefly justify the selection of CCD over other RSM designs.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted, done). CCD technique is favored to the full factorial and three-level design as it estimates the linear, quadratic and interaction effects with minimum tests, which will lead to a good model fitting, greater accuracy in prediction, reduced amount of residual error, and a high value of R2, that could permit the creation of three-dimensional response surfaces with great reliability. Consequently, it has commonly been considered as the best experimental design to investigate the second-order response models.4, 15
5.1 Compressive Strength Results
Reduce narrative repetition of numerical values already presented in figures.
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. Due to the high number of mixes and material changes, numerical values are supplied in the text in addition to tables and figures to assist the reader in understanding and following the patterns in the results.
Strengthen microstructural explanations linking UPOFA dilution, silica fume nucleation, and fiber bridging effects.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done)
The compressive strength of GHSC is enhanced over a curing period of 7 to 28 days as a result of the accelerated hydration of conventional OPC and due to the pozzolanic effects of SF. The formation of secondary C-S-H is the consequence of the interaction between (Ca(OH)₂) produced during cement hydration and SiO₂ in SF 61,62. This procedure increases the durability of the concrete by reducing the incidence of microcracks during periods of tension. In the same trend, adding steel and PET fibers improved the compressive strength of HSC and GHSC. The GHSC mixtures with a combination of (UPOFA-SF-ST-PET) registered the highest compressive strength of mixtures in GII and GIII at all curing periods. Hereby, the compressive strength of (M39) GHSC-U60 increased by 17%,25% and 18% at ages of 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, related to control mix. This strength development was attributed to the effectiveness of binary binders (UPOFA and SF) in increasing bond formation between steel and PET fibers and other concrete ingredients. The tiny particle size and pozzolanic reactivity of UPOFA and SF reduced void volume and produced extra C-S-H gels, strengthening the aggregate-paste interfacial connection and increasing bonding capabilities with fibers. Adding steel and PET fibers may improve the fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced GHSC composites by limiting micro-crack formation under load, which is accomplished by forming a bridge network within the concrete microstructure33,34,64
5.2 Statistical Analysis and Modeling
Briefly explain why post-hoc statistical tests were not conducted.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Therefore, Post-hoc tests were not conducted as the principal analysis showed that the compressive strength increased significantly due to a combination of silica, steel fibers, and PET fibers, so the extra post-hoc comparisons were not necessary.
.Clearly distinguish statistical significance from engineering significance.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted).
The practical relevance of these variations on material performance or structural design is reflected in engineering significance, whereas statistical significance shows that observed differences are unlikely to be the result of chance (e.g., p<0.05). Despite having little engineering significance, certain outcomes could be statistically significant.
6. Optimization Results and Practical Implications
Add a short subsection explicitly addressing engineering applications of the optimized mix.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. The blending of fibers and pozzolanic substances will offer a sure way of minimizing the maintenance and the service life of the concrete structures.
Suggested action:
Clearly state where and how the optimized concrete can be practically used.
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion.
7. Conclusions
Avoid repeating detailed numerical results.
Explicitly acknowledge study limitations (laboratory scale, early-age focus).
Provide a clear direction for future work
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Further, this study primarily focused on early-age mechanical ability, conducted within a controlled civil engineering laboratory and environment. Consequently, additional future works are required to investigate durability, long-term performance, and comprehensive structural validation.Response to Reviewer CommentsCompeting Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Close
The authors thank the reviewer for their careful reading and constructive comments below. We are very pleased to receive the reviewer’s recognition of the research work in this paper. We believe that we have addressed all of the comments through our responses below, as well as in the text of the manuscript when appropriate.
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or statistical optimization.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
2. Abstract
Clearly explain why early-age compressive strength is critical, particularly for UPOFA-based concrete.
Explicitly state the application scope (non-structural or low-load applications).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
Moreover, the replacement rates of HSGC are probably high in POFA, which is constrained in the areas of the application where the removal of the formwork or pre-stressing of the structures is required in a very short period of time, and the high early-age strengths are required. 16
Separate experimental findings from modeling outcomes more clearly.
Suggested action:
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion, as shown, experimental findings and modeling outcomes are presented separately.
Add one sentence clarifying application limitations.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment (Noted, done). However, somehow these studies suggested the limitation of the POFA used because the highest was limited. The compressive strength was determined at a POFA replacement level of 20%, and the ultimate highest compressive strength of 28-days compressive strength achieved with the concretes that used POFA ranged between 60 and 86 MPa. 17, 18
3. Introduction
Reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, done, within introduction part).
Strengthen the research gap, particularly regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the research significance subsection already addresses the gap regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Clearly distinguish this study from previous related works.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the Introduction already highlights the study’s novelty and clearly distinguishes it from previous works.
4.1 Materials Characterization
Consider adding a summary table describing the role and expected effect of each material (UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, PET fiber).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s excellent suggestion. (Noted, done, see Table 2).
4.2 Experimental Design and RSM
Justify why the steel fiber and PET fiber contents were fixed at specific values.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done). The contents of the steel and PET fibers were set to 1% volume, which is consistent with previous studies reporting that this amount has improved mechanical performance, crack control, and ductility whilst maintaining workability.21, 36
Briefly justify the selection of CCD over other RSM designs.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted, done). CCD technique is favored to the full factorial and three-level design as it estimates the linear, quadratic and interaction effects with minimum tests, which will lead to a good model fitting, greater accuracy in prediction, reduced amount of residual error, and a high value of R2, that could permit the creation of three-dimensional response surfaces with great reliability. Consequently, it has commonly been considered as the best experimental design to investigate the second-order response models.4, 15
5.1 Compressive Strength Results
Reduce narrative repetition of numerical values already presented in figures.
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. Due to the high number of mixes and material changes, numerical values are supplied in the text in addition to tables and figures to assist the reader in understanding and following the patterns in the results.
Strengthen microstructural explanations linking UPOFA dilution, silica fume nucleation, and fiber bridging effects.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done)
The compressive strength of GHSC is enhanced over a curing period of 7 to 28 days as a result of the accelerated hydration of conventional OPC and due to the pozzolanic effects of SF. The formation of secondary C-S-H is the consequence of the interaction between (Ca(OH)₂) produced during cement hydration and SiO₂ in SF 61,62. This procedure increases the durability of the concrete by reducing the incidence of microcracks during periods of tension. In the same trend, adding steel and PET fibers improved the compressive strength of HSC and GHSC. The GHSC mixtures with a combination of (UPOFA-SF-ST-PET) registered the highest compressive strength of mixtures in GII and GIII at all curing periods. Hereby, the compressive strength of (M39) GHSC-U60 increased by 17%,25% and 18% at ages of 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, related to control mix. This strength development was attributed to the effectiveness of binary binders (UPOFA and SF) in increasing bond formation between steel and PET fibers and other concrete ingredients. The tiny particle size and pozzolanic reactivity of UPOFA and SF reduced void volume and produced extra C-S-H gels, strengthening the aggregate-paste interfacial connection and increasing bonding capabilities with fibers. Adding steel and PET fibers may improve the fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced GHSC composites by limiting micro-crack formation under load, which is accomplished by forming a bridge network within the concrete microstructure33,34,64
5.2 Statistical Analysis and Modeling
Briefly explain why post-hoc statistical tests were not conducted.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Therefore, Post-hoc tests were not conducted as the principal analysis showed that the compressive strength increased significantly due to a combination of silica, steel fibers, and PET fibers, so the extra post-hoc comparisons were not necessary.
.Clearly distinguish statistical significance from engineering significance.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted).
The practical relevance of these variations on material performance or structural design is reflected in engineering significance, whereas statistical significance shows that observed differences are unlikely to be the result of chance (e.g., p<0.05). Despite having little engineering significance, certain outcomes could be statistically significant.
6. Optimization Results and Practical Implications
Add a short subsection explicitly addressing engineering applications of the optimized mix.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. The blending of fibers and pozzolanic substances will offer a sure way of minimizing the maintenance and the service life of the concrete structures.
Suggested action:
Clearly state where and how the optimized concrete can be practically used.
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion.
7. Conclusions
Avoid repeating detailed numerical results.
Explicitly acknowledge study limitations (laboratory scale, early-age focus).
Provide a clear direction for future work
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Further, this study primarily focused on early-age mechanical ability, conducted within a controlled civil engineering laboratory and environment. Consequently, additional future works are required to investigate durability, long-term performance, and comprehensive structural validation. - Author Response 05 May 2026Aktham Hatem Qasim, Department of Engineering Affairs, University of Fallujah, Al-Fallujah, Iraq05 May 2026Author ResponseReviewer 1
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or ... Continue reading Reviewer 1
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or statistical optimization.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). “Optimizing Early Compressive Strength of Ultrafine POFA-Based Green HSC: An Experimental and RSM Approach with Silica Fume and Hybrid Fibers”
2. Abstract
Clearly explain why early-age compressive strength is critical, particularly for UPOFA-based concrete.
Explicitly state the application scope (non-structural or low-load applications).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
Moreover, the replacement rates of HSGC are probably high in POFA, which is constrained in the areas of the application where the removal of the formwork or pre-stressing of the structures is required in a very short period of time, and the high early-age strengths are required. 16
Separate experimental findings from modeling outcomes more clearly.
Suggested action:
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion, as shown, experimental findings and modeling outcomes are presented separately. (See, subsection 3.2: Mathematical modeling and statistical analysis results.
Add one sentence clarifying application limitations.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment (Noted, done). However, somehow these studies suggested the limitation of the POFA used because the highest was limited. The compressive strength was determined at a POFA replacement level of 20%, and the ultimate highest compressive strength of 28-days compressive strength achieved with the concretes that used POFA ranged between 60 and 86 MPa. 17, 18
3. Introduction
Reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the manuscript has been revised to reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts, particularly in the Introduction section.)
Strengthen the research gap, particularly regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, done. See subsection 1.1: research significance which already addresses the gap regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.)
Clearly distinguish this study from previous related works.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the Introduction has been revised to more clearly highlight the novelty of this study and distinguish it from previous related work.)
4.1 Materials Characterization
Consider adding a summary table describing the role and expected effect of each material (UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, PET fiber).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s excellent suggestion. (Noted, done. A summary table has been added (Table 2) to clearly describe the role and expected effect of each material, including UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, and PET fiber.).
4.2 Experimental Design and RSM
Justify why the steel fiber and PET fiber contents were fixed at specific values.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done). The contents of the steel and PET fibers were set to 1% volume, which is consistent with previous studies reporting that this amount has improved mechanical performance, crack control, and ductility whilst maintaining workability.21, 36. Further, studies done before have indicated that the strongest effect of these types of fibers, especially when combined with pozzolanic substances, is at this ratio. In turn, selecting 0% and 1% was sufficient to capture the main effect of the fiber addition and avoid irrelevant intermediate levels, which would not yield much different results.
Briefly justify the selection of CCD over other RSM designs.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted, done). CCD technique is favored to the full factorial and three-level design as it estimates the linear, quadratic and interaction effects with minimum tests, which will lead to a good model fitting, greater accuracy in prediction, reduced amount of residual error, and a high value of R2, that could permit the creation of three-dimensional response surfaces with great reliability. Consequently, it has commonly been considered as the best experimental design to investigate the second-order response models.4, 15
5.1 Compressive Strength Results
Reduce narrative repetition of numerical values already presented in figures.
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. Due to the high number of mixes and material changes, numerical values are supplied in the text in addition to tables and figures to assist the reader in understanding and following the patterns in the results.
Strengthen microstructural explanations linking UPOFA dilution, silica fume nucleation, and fiber bridging effects.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done)
The compressive strength of GHSC is enhanced over a curing period of 7 to 28 days as a result of the accelerated hydration of conventional OPC and due to the pozzolanic effects of SF. The formation of secondary C-S-H is the consequence of the interaction between (Ca(OH)₂) produced during cement hydration and SiO₂ in SF 61,62. This procedure increases the durability of the concrete by reducing the incidence of microcracks during periods of tension. In the same trend, adding steel and PET fibers improved the compressive strength of HSC and GHSC. The GHSC mixtures with a combination of (UPOFA-SF-ST-PET) registered the highest compressive strength of mixtures in GII and GIII at all curing periods. Hereby, the compressive strength of (M39) GHSC-U60 increased by 17%,25% and 18% at ages of 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, related to control mix. This strength development was attributed to the effectiveness of binary binders (UPOFA and SF) in increasing bond formation between steel and PET fibers and other concrete ingredients. The tiny particle size and pozzolanic reactivity of UPOFA and SF reduced void volume and produced extra C-S-H gels, strengthening the aggregate-paste interfacial connection and increasing bonding capabilities with fibers. Adding steel and PET fibers may improve the fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced GHSC composites by limiting micro-crack formation under load, which is accomplished by forming a bridge network within the concrete microstructure33,34,64
5.2 Statistical Analysis and Modeling
Briefly explain why post-hoc statistical tests were not conducted.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Therefore, Post-hoc tests were not conducted as the principal analysis showed that the compressive strength increased significantly due to a combination of silica, steel fibers, and PET fibers, so the extra post-hoc comparisons were not necessary.
.Clearly distinguish statistical significance from engineering significance.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted).
The practical relevance of these variations on material performance or structural design is reflected in engineering significance, whereas statistical significance shows that observed differences are unlikely to be the result of chance (e.g., p<0.05). Despite having little engineering significance, certain outcomes could be statistically significant.
6. Optimization Results and Practical Implications
Add a short subsection explicitly addressing engineering applications of the optimized mix.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. The blending of fibers and pozzolanic substances will offer a sure way of minimizing the maintenance and the service life of the concrete structures.
Suggested action:
Clearly state where and how the optimized concrete can be practically used.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion. (See subsection 3.4)
There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. Thus, related to current study the optimized GHSC is applicable in structural elements, which include beams, columns, and precast elements, especially in settings that demand high strength and durability.
7. Conclusions
Avoid repeating detailed numerical results.
Explicitly acknowledge study limitations (laboratory scale, early-age focus).
Provide a clear direction for future work
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done, the future work paragraph has been added at the end of the Conclusion section). Future works are required in the optimization of GHSC by RSM in terms of long-term durability performance in diverse environmental factors, such as chloride penetration, sulfate attack, carbonation, water absorption, and permeability. Moreover, machine learning in combination with RSM can make its predictions more accurate and create a more resilient multi-objective optimization model that will consider the mechanical and durability characteristics of sustainable concrete design.Reviewer 1Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
1. Title
The title is informative but could better reflect the use of statistical optimization techniques.
Suggested action: Consider explicitly mentioning the use of response surface methodology or statistical optimization.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). “Optimizing Early Compressive Strength of Ultrafine POFA-Based Green HSC: An Experimental and RSM Approach with Silica Fume and Hybrid Fibers”
2. Abstract
Clearly explain why early-age compressive strength is critical, particularly for UPOFA-based concrete.
Explicitly state the application scope (non-structural or low-load applications).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done)
Moreover, the replacement rates of HSGC are probably high in POFA, which is constrained in the areas of the application where the removal of the formwork or pre-stressing of the structures is required in a very short period of time, and the high early-age strengths are required. 16
Separate experimental findings from modeling outcomes more clearly.
Suggested action:
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion, as shown, experimental findings and modeling outcomes are presented separately. (See, subsection 3.2: Mathematical modeling and statistical analysis results.
Add one sentence clarifying application limitations.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment (Noted, done). However, somehow these studies suggested the limitation of the POFA used because the highest was limited. The compressive strength was determined at a POFA replacement level of 20%, and the ultimate highest compressive strength of 28-days compressive strength achieved with the concretes that used POFA ranged between 60 and 86 MPa. 17, 18
3. Introduction
Reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the manuscript has been revised to reduce repetition related to general sustainability concepts, particularly in the Introduction section.)
Strengthen the research gap, particularly regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, done. See subsection 1.1: research significance which already addresses the gap regarding hybrid fiber systems in high-volume UPOFA concrete.)
Clearly distinguish this study from previous related works.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment (Noted, the Introduction has been revised to more clearly highlight the novelty of this study and distinguish it from previous related work.)
4.1 Materials Characterization
Consider adding a summary table describing the role and expected effect of each material (UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, PET fiber).
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s excellent suggestion. (Noted, done. A summary table has been added (Table 2) to clearly describe the role and expected effect of each material, including UPOFA, silica fume, steel fiber, and PET fiber.).
4.2 Experimental Design and RSM
Justify why the steel fiber and PET fiber contents were fixed at specific values.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done). The contents of the steel and PET fibers were set to 1% volume, which is consistent with previous studies reporting that this amount has improved mechanical performance, crack control, and ductility whilst maintaining workability.21, 36. Further, studies done before have indicated that the strongest effect of these types of fibers, especially when combined with pozzolanic substances, is at this ratio. In turn, selecting 0% and 1% was sufficient to capture the main effect of the fiber addition and avoid irrelevant intermediate levels, which would not yield much different results.
Briefly justify the selection of CCD over other RSM designs.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted, done). CCD technique is favored to the full factorial and three-level design as it estimates the linear, quadratic and interaction effects with minimum tests, which will lead to a good model fitting, greater accuracy in prediction, reduced amount of residual error, and a high value of R2, that could permit the creation of three-dimensional response surfaces with great reliability. Consequently, it has commonly been considered as the best experimental design to investigate the second-order response models.4, 15
5.1 Compressive Strength Results
Reduce narrative repetition of numerical values already presented in figures.
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. Due to the high number of mixes and material changes, numerical values are supplied in the text in addition to tables and figures to assist the reader in understanding and following the patterns in the results.
Strengthen microstructural explanations linking UPOFA dilution, silica fume nucleation, and fiber bridging effects.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s careful reading. (Noted, done)
The compressive strength of GHSC is enhanced over a curing period of 7 to 28 days as a result of the accelerated hydration of conventional OPC and due to the pozzolanic effects of SF. The formation of secondary C-S-H is the consequence of the interaction between (Ca(OH)₂) produced during cement hydration and SiO₂ in SF 61,62. This procedure increases the durability of the concrete by reducing the incidence of microcracks during periods of tension. In the same trend, adding steel and PET fibers improved the compressive strength of HSC and GHSC. The GHSC mixtures with a combination of (UPOFA-SF-ST-PET) registered the highest compressive strength of mixtures in GII and GIII at all curing periods. Hereby, the compressive strength of (M39) GHSC-U60 increased by 17%,25% and 18% at ages of 3, 7, and 28 days, respectively, related to control mix. This strength development was attributed to the effectiveness of binary binders (UPOFA and SF) in increasing bond formation between steel and PET fibers and other concrete ingredients. The tiny particle size and pozzolanic reactivity of UPOFA and SF reduced void volume and produced extra C-S-H gels, strengthening the aggregate-paste interfacial connection and increasing bonding capabilities with fibers. Adding steel and PET fibers may improve the fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced GHSC composites by limiting micro-crack formation under load, which is accomplished by forming a bridge network within the concrete microstructure33,34,64
5.2 Statistical Analysis and Modeling
Briefly explain why post-hoc statistical tests were not conducted.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). Therefore, Post-hoc tests were not conducted as the principal analysis showed that the compressive strength increased significantly due to a combination of silica, steel fibers, and PET fibers, so the extra post-hoc comparisons were not necessary.
.Clearly distinguish statistical significance from engineering significance.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s comment. (Noted).
The practical relevance of these variations on material performance or structural design is reflected in engineering significance, whereas statistical significance shows that observed differences are unlikely to be the result of chance (e.g., p<0.05). Despite having little engineering significance, certain outcomes could be statistically significant.
6. Optimization Results and Practical Implications
Add a short subsection explicitly addressing engineering applications of the optimized mix.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done). There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. The blending of fibers and pozzolanic substances will offer a sure way of minimizing the maintenance and the service life of the concrete structures.
Suggested action:
Clearly state where and how the optimized concrete can be practically used.
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s suggestion. (See subsection 3.4)
There is indeed a need to mention that the optimized concrete mix includes silica, steel fiber, and PET fiber, has a much better compressive strength, ductility, and crack resistance. They increase its applicability especially in structural components with high load needs such as beams, columns, and slabs, and in areas where it is important that both durability, impact resistance, and long-term performance. Thus, related to current study the optimized GHSC is applicable in structural elements, which include beams, columns, and precast elements, especially in settings that demand high strength and durability.
7. Conclusions
Avoid repeating detailed numerical results.
Explicitly acknowledge study limitations (laboratory scale, early-age focus).
Provide a clear direction for future work
Action
Thanks for the reviewer’s important comment. (Noted, done, the future work paragraph has been added at the end of the Conclusion section). Future works are required in the optimization of GHSC by RSM in terms of long-term durability performance in diverse environmental factors, such as chloride penetration, sulfate attack, carbonation, water absorption, and permeability. Moreover, machine learning in combination with RSM can make its predictions more accurate and create a more resilient multi-objective optimization model that will consider the mechanical and durability characteristics of sustainable concrete design.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
- Approved
- Approved with reservations
- Not approved
| Invited Reviewers | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| Version 3 (revision) 05 May 26 | ||
| Version 2 (revision) 26 Feb 26 | read | |
| Version 1 22 Jan 26 | read |
Sign up for content alerts
You are now signed up to receive this alert
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests'
- Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper.
- You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors.
- You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student).
- You work at the same institute as any of the authors.
- You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission.
- You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published.
Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests'
- You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements.
- You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors.
- You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on.
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
close
Error
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.
Email us for further assistance.
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
Email address not valid, please try again
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
Code not correct, please try again
Server error, please try again.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Please wait...
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.