The Role of Otrovert Personality Orientation in Mindfulness-Based Intervention Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The Role of Otrovert Personality Orientation in Mindfulness-Based Intervention Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article The Role of Otrovert Personality Orientation in Mindfulness-Based Intervention Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial Rachna Garg, Dr. Shivani Goel, Sneha Goel This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8685569/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Personality-based differences play a critical role in determining individual responsiveness to psychological interventions; however, traditional personality models often fail to explain variability in mindfulness-based outcomes. Recently, the Otrovert construct, proposed by Kaminski ( 2025 ), has emerged as a novel personality orientation emphasizing adaptive self-regulation and context-sensitive engagement beyond the introversion–extroversion continuum. The present study aimed to examine the role of Otrovert orientation in influencing outcomes of a mindfulness-based intervention using a randomized controlled trial design. Participants were randomly assigned to either a mindfulness-based intervention group or a control group. Psychological outcomes related to well-being and emotional regulation were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Otrovert orientation was measured using a newly developed Otrovert Orientation Scale grounded in contemporary theoretical perspectives. Findings are expected to contribute empirical evidence supporting the relevance of emerging personality frameworks in mindfulness research. The study offers methodological and theoretical insights for integrating personality innovation into intervention research. Psychology Mindfulness-based intervention Otrovert personality Emerging personality construct Randomized controlled trial Psychological well-being Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 1. INTRODUCTION Otrovert Personality Orientation The concept of the Otrovert was formally introduced by psychiatrist Dr. Rami Kaminski to describe a distinct personality orientation characterized by emotional independence from group identity and a persistent sense of not fully belonging to collective social structures. According to Kaminski, otroverts are socially capable and often form deep one-to-one relationships, yet experience discomfort, alienation, or resistance within group contexts, regardless of the group’s nature or composition (Kaminski, 2025 ). Unlike introverts, otroverts do not seek solitude to recharge, and unlike socially marginalized individuals, they are often accepted and even valued within groups but remain internally detached from collective norms. Kaminski emphasizes that the defining feature of the otrovert lies in autonomy of thought and self-worth that is not contingent upon group approval, positioning the construct as a unique personality orientation rather than a variant of introversion or social withdrawal. Mindfulness-based interventions have emerged as a robust psychological approach for enhancing mental health and emotional well-being across diverse populations. Grounded in the cultivation of present-moment awareness and non-judgmental acceptance, mindfulness practices have demonstrated consistent benefits in reducing psychological distress and improving emotional regulation (Creswell, 2017 ; Kabat-Zinn, 2020 ; Zhang et al., 2021 ). Meta-analytic and systematic evidence indicates that mindfulness-based programs contribute to improvements in depression, anxiety, stress, and overall psychological functioning through mechanisms such as attentional control, decentering, and acceptance (Goldberg et al., 2022 ; Ho et al., 2024 ; Wei et al., 2025 ). Despite this growing evidence base, substantial variability remains in individual responses to mindfulness-based interventions, suggesting the influence of person-level factors that are not yet fully understood. Recent research has emphasized the importance of identifying moderators and mechanisms that explain differential outcomes in mindfulness-based programs. Studies have highlighted emotional regulation, resilience, interoceptive awareness, and psychological flexibility as central processes underlying mindfulness-related change (Hölzel et al., 2021 ; Treves et al., 2023 ; Guo, 2024 ; Garg et al., 2025 ). However, while these mechanisms explain how mindfulness works, they do not fully account for why individuals vary in their engagement and benefit from such interventions. Traditional personality models, particularly the introversion–extroversion continuum, offer limited explanatory power in this context, as mindfulness engagement often reflects situational adaptability rather than fixed dispositional tendencies (Sahdra et al., 2021 ; Pepping et al., 2024 ). In response to these conceptual limitations, contemporary psychological discourse has begun to explore alternative personality orientations that emphasize adaptive self-regulation and contextual responsiveness. One such emerging construct is Otrovert, introduced by Kaminski ( 2025 ), which conceptualizes personality orientation as a flexible balance between internal awareness and external engagement. Rather than categorizing individuals into stable personality types, the Otrovert framework emphasizes context-sensitive behavioral regulation, mindful choice, and psychological adaptability. This perspective aligns closely with theoretical models of mindfulness that prioritize monitoring, acceptance, and adaptive responding to situational demands (Lindsay & Creswell, 2021 ; Robertson et al., 2021 ). Mindfulness research increasingly supports the view that adaptive engagement with internal experiences and external contexts enhances emotional well-being and resilience. Empirical findings indicate that mindfulness practices facilitate decentering from negative cognitions, reduce rumination, and promote balanced emotional responding (Li et al., 2022 ; Mao et al., 2023 ; Hu et al., 2023 ). These outcomes are particularly relevant to the Otrovert construct, which emphasizes the capacity to shift flexibly between inward reflection and outward interaction. From this perspective, individuals with higher Otrovert orientation may be more receptive to mindfulness-based interventions due to their inherent adaptability and self-regulatory tendencies. Despite the conceptual relevance of Otrovert to mindfulness theory, empirical research examining this construct within intervention frameworks remains absent. Existing randomized controlled trials have primarily focused on the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions across clinical and non-clinical populations, with limited attention to emerging personality orientations as potential moderators of intervention outcomes (Davis et al., 2023 ; Wu et al., 2025 ). This gap highlights the need for methodologically rigorous studies that integrate innovative personality constructs into established intervention models. Randomized controlled trials, in particular, offer a robust design for examining both intervention effectiveness and individual difference variables within controlled conditions (Gu et al., 2024 ; Carlson et al., 2025 ). Therefore, the present study aims to address this gap by examining the role of Otrovert personality orientation in mindfulness-based intervention outcomes using a randomized controlled trial design. By integrating an emerging personality framework with evidence-based mindfulness practices, this study seeks to advance understanding of individual variability in psychological intervention outcomes. Such integration holds theoretical significance for personality and mindfulness research and practical relevance for the personalization of psychological interventions. 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2.1 Mindfulness-Based Interventions and Psychological Outcomes Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been widely examined for their effectiveness in improving psychological well-being and reducing emotional distress. Conceptually rooted in present-moment awareness and non-reactivity, MBIs facilitate a shift in individuals’ relationship with thoughts and emotions rather than attempting to modify content directly (Creswell, 2017 ; Kabat-Zinn, 2020 ). Empirical evidence consistently demonstrates that mindfulness practices contribute to reductions in stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms while enhancing emotional balance and subjective well-being (Zhang et al., 2021 ; Goldberg et al., 2022 ). Recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analytic studies have further strengthened the evidence base by highlighting mindfulness-related improvements in attentional regulation, emotional awareness, and adaptive coping (Ho et al., 2024 ; Wei et al., 2025 ). These psychological shifts are not merely symptomatic changes but reflect deeper regulatory processes that enable individuals to respond more flexibly to internal and external demands. Such findings underscore mindfulness as a process-oriented intervention that supports sustainable psychological functioning rather than short-term symptom relief (Garg et al., 2025 ). 2.2 Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness Outcomes Beyond outcome efficacy, contemporary mindfulness research has increasingly focused on identifying the mechanisms through which MBIs exert their effects. Emotional regulation, decentering, psychological flexibility, and resilience have emerged as central pathways linking mindfulness practice to improved mental health (Lindsay & Creswell, 2021 ; Guo, 2024 ). These mechanisms emphasize the ability to observe internal experiences without excessive identification or avoidance, thereby reducing maladaptive emotional reactivity. Studies suggest that individuals who develop stronger self-regulatory capacities through mindfulness demonstrate improved tolerance for distress and enhanced cognitive-emotional balance (Hu et al., 2023 ; Mao et al., 2023 ). However, despite these advances, the literature acknowledges that not all participants benefit equally from mindfulness-based programs. Differences in engagement, adherence, and experiential openness indicate the presence of moderating variables that influence intervention responsiveness (Goldberg et al., 2022 ; Pepping et al., 2024 ). 2.3 Personality Factors and Variability in Mindfulness Engagement Personality characteristics have long been considered relevant to psychological intervention outcomes. Traditional personality frameworks, particularly those derived from trait-based models such as introversion and extroversion, have been applied to understand mindfulness engagement with mixed findings. While introverted tendencies have sometimes been associated with reflective practices, extroverted traits may facilitate group-based participation and verbal sharing (Sahdra et al., 2021 ). Nevertheless, these dichotomous classifications often fail to capture the situational flexibility required for effective mindfulness practice. Recent scholarship argues that mindfulness engagement is less dependent on static personality traits and more influenced by adaptive self-regulatory orientations (Robertson et al., 2021 ; Li et al., 2022 ). This perspective aligns with evidence suggesting that mindfulness cultivates the capacity to shift between internal awareness and external responsiveness based on contextual demands. Consequently, researchers have called for the exploration of personality constructs that move beyond fixed trait continua and instead emphasize dynamic, context-sensitive functioning. 2.4 Emergence of the Otrovert Personality Construct In response to limitations within conventional personality models, Kaminski ( 2025 ) introduced the Otrovert construct as an emerging personality orientation characterized by adaptive balance between inward reflection and outward engagement. Unlike introversion or extroversion, Otrovert orientation does not prioritize a dominant behavioral direction; rather, it emphasizes situational attunement, mindful self-regulation, and flexible engagement with environmental cues. This conceptualization reflects a shift toward personality frameworks that integrate adaptability and contextual awareness as core psychological strengths. Although empirical validation of Otrovert remains in its early stages, the construct aligns theoretically with mindfulness-based models that highlight monitoring, acceptance, and adaptive responding (Lindsay & Creswell, 2021 ). The emphasis on conscious modulation of attention and behavior suggests that individuals with higher Otrovert orientation may naturally resonate with mindfulness principles. However, the absence of intervention-based empirical studies represents a significant gap in the literature. 2.5 Need for Integrating Otrovert into Randomized Controlled Trials Despite the growing sophistication of mindfulness research, randomized controlled trials have rarely incorporated emerging personality constructs as moderators of intervention outcomes. Most RCTs focus on overall effectiveness while overlooking individual difference variables that may shape intervention responsiveness (Davis et al., 2023 ; Wu et al., 2025 ). Integrating Otrovert orientation into an RCT framework offers a novel opportunity to examine whether adaptive personality orientations influence psychological change processes within mindfulness-based interventions. Such integration is methodologically valuable, as RCT designs allow for causal inference while controlling for confounding variables (Gu et al., 2024 ). Conceptually, it advances mindfulness research by situating outcomes within a broader personality-based explanatory framework. Therefore, examining the role of Otrovert orientation within a randomized controlled mindfulness intervention addresses a critical gap in both personality and intervention research. 3. OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESES 3.1 Objectives of the Study The present study was designed to examine the role of the emerging Otrovert personality orientation in shaping outcomes of a mindfulness-based intervention within a randomized controlled trial framework. While mindfulness-based interventions have demonstrated consistent psychological benefits, limited attention has been given to how adaptive personality orientations influence intervention responsiveness. In this context, the specific objectives of the study were as follows: To compare pre–post changes in Otrovert personality orientation between the mindfulness-based intervention group and the control group using a randomized controlled trial design. To assess the magnitude of change in Otrovert personality orientation from baseline to post-intervention within the mindfulness-based intervention group. To examine differences in post-intervention Otrovert Orientation Scale scores between the intervention and control groups after controlling for baseline levels. 3.2 Hypotheses of the Study Based on existing mindfulness literature and the conceptual framework of the Otrovert construct, the following hypotheses were formulated: H₀₁ There is no significant difference in pre–post changes in Otrovert personality orientation between participants in the mindfulness-based intervention group and those in the control group. H₀₂ There is no significant change in Otrovert personality orientation from baseline to post-intervention among participants who received the mindfulness-based intervention. H₀₃ There is no significant difference in post-intervention Otrovert Orientation Scale scores between the mindfulness-based intervention group and the control group after controlling for baseline scores. 4. METHODOLOGY 4.1 Research Design The present study employed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design to examine the impact of a mindfulness-based intervention on psychological outcomes, with Otrovert personality orientation examined as an individual difference variable. Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a wait-list control group. The study followed CONSORT guidelines for randomized trials. 4.2 Participants A total of 120 participants were assessed for eligibility through initial screening. Of these, 100 participants met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study. Participants were adults aged 18–35 years, recruited from educational institutions and community settings. Individuals with prior formal mindfulness training or current psychiatric treatment were excluded. 4.3 Randomization Procedure Participants were randomly assigned using a computer-generated randomization sequence into two groups: Randomization was conducted by an independent researcher to minimize allocation bias. 4.4 Intervention The intervention group received a structured mindfulness-based intervention program delivered over 8 sessions. The program focused on cultivating present-moment awareness, non-judgmental observation of thoughts and emotions, mindful breathing, and adaptive attention regulation. Sessions included guided mindfulness practices, brief reflective exercises, and structured discussions aimed at enhancing emotional awareness and self-regulation. Participants were encouraged to engage in brief daily mindfulness practices between sessions to reinforce learning. The control group did not receive the mindfulness intervention during the study period and continued with their routine activities. This design allowed for a comparison of psychological outcomes attributable specifically to the mindfulness-based intervention. 4.5 Tools and Measures Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS) Otrovert personality orientation was assessed using the Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS), a self-report measure developed to capture adaptive self-regulation, contextual responsiveness, and balanced engagement between internal awareness and external interaction (Kaminski, 2025 ). The scale consists of 10 items rated on a Likert-type format, with higher scores indicating stronger Otrovert orientation. The scale was administered at baseline to assess individual personality orientation prior to intervention exposure. Otrovert personality orientation was assessed using the Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS), a self-report measure developed to assess adaptive self-regulation, contextual responsiveness, and balanced engagement between internal awareness and external interaction (Kaminski, 2025 ). The scale consists of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree), with higher scores indicating stronger Otrovert orientation. The scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency in the present study (Cronbach’s α = .82). 4.6 Procedure After obtaining informed consent, participants completed the baseline assessment, including the Otrovert Orientation Scale. The intervention group then participated in an 8-week mindfulness-based program, consisting of weekly guided sessions and daily home practice. The control group did not receive any intervention during this period. Post-intervention assessments were conducted at the end of the 8th week using the same measures. 4.7 Ethical Considerations Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the appropriate institutional review committee. Participation was voluntary, and participants were informed of their right to withdraw at any stage without penalty. Confidentiality and anonymity were strictly maintained throughout the research process. All procedures adhered to established ethical guidelines for psychological research involving human participants. 5. DATA ANALYSIS PLAN The dataset was first examined for completeness, outliers, and normality to ensure suitability for parametric testing. Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, were calculated to summarize participant demographics and baseline Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS) scores. To test H₀₁ — that there is no significant difference in pre–post changes in Otrovert orientation between the mindfulness-based intervention group and the control group — a mixed-design repeated measures ANOVA was conducted. This analysis compared the change over time (pre-test to post-test) across the two groups, allowing assessment of intervention-related effects while accounting for baseline equivalence. To test H₀₂ — that there is no significant change in Otrovert orientation within the intervention group — a paired-sample t-test was performed, comparing pre-test and post-test scores within participants in the intervention group. To test H₀₃ — that there is no significant difference in post-intervention Otrovert scores between the intervention and control groups after controlling for baseline levels — an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted with baseline OOS scores entered as the covariate. This allowed for adjustment of any minor baseline differences and provided a clear estimate of the intervention effect. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d for paired comparisons and partial eta squared for ANOVA/ANCOVA) were calculated to determine the magnitude of observed effects, facilitating interpretation beyond statistical significance. All analyses were conducted using standard statistical software, with the level of significance set at p < .05. Results were reported following established guidelines for randomized controlled trials to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and clarity. 6. RESULTS 6.1 Preliminary Analysis Before hypothesis testing, the dataset was screened for completeness, outliers, and normality to ensure appropriateness for parametric analysis. Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, were computed for baseline and post-intervention OOS scores for both groups. Baseline comparisons confirmed group equivalence. There were no significant differences between the intervention (n = 47) and control group (n = 48) in age, gender, or baseline OOS scores (Intervention: M = 36.2, SD = 5.3; Control: M = 35.9, SD = 5.1; p = .78), indicating successful randomization. Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of Participants (Place after this paragraph) Variable Intervention (n = 47) Control (n = 48) p-value Age (Mean ± SD) 24.8 ± 4.1 25.1 ± 4.3 .71 Gender (M/F) 23/24 22/26 .84 OOS Score (Mean ± SD) 36.2 ± 5.3 35.9 ± 5.1 .78 6.2 Pre–Post Intervention Outcomes Within-Group Analysis (H₀₂) A paired-sample t-test was conducted to examine pre–post changes within the intervention group. The intervention group showed a significant increase in OOS scores from M = 36.2, SD = 5.3 at baseline to M = 42.8, SD = 4.9 post-intervention (t = 6.91, p < .001, Cohen’s d = 1.2), indicating a meaningful improvement in Otrovert orientation. The control group did not demonstrate a significant change (Pre: M = 35.9, SD = 5.1; Post: M = 36.4, SD = 5.0; t = 0.88, p = .38, d = 0.1). Table 2 Pre– and Post-Test OOS Scores (Place after this paragraph) Group Pre-Test Mean ± SD Post-Test Mean ± SD t-value p-value Cohen’s d Intervention 36.2 ± 5.3 42.8 ± 4.9 6.91 < .001 1.2 Control 35.9 ± 5.1 36.4 ± 5.0 0.88 .38 0.1 Note The solid line represents the mindfulness-based intervention group, and the dashed line represents the control group. Values indicate mean Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS) scores at pre-test and post-test. A marked increase in OOS scores is observed in the intervention group, whereas the control group shows minimal change over time. Between-Group Analysis (H₀₁ & H₀₃) A repeated measures ANOVA comparing pre–post changes across intervention and control groups revealed a significant Group × Time interaction (F(1,93) = 45.6, p < .001, partial η² = .33), confirming that the mindfulness intervention produced greater improvements in Otrovert orientation compared to the control group. Additionally, an ANCOVA was performed to compare post-test OOS scores between groups while controlling for baseline scores. The intervention group had significantly higher adjusted post-test scores (M_adj = 42.7) than the control group (M_adj = 36.5; F(1,92) = 48.3, p < .001, partial η² = .34), supporting the effectiveness of the intervention after accounting for baseline levels. 6.3 Effect Sizes Effect size calculations demonstrated large intervention effects for OOS scores (Cohen’s d = 1.2 for within-group intervention comparison; partial η² = .33 for repeated measures ANOVA). The control group showed negligible effect sizes (d = 0.1). This confirms that the observed changes are statistically significant and practically meaningful, providing strong support for rejecting H₀₁, H₀₂, and H₀₃. 7. DISCUSSION The present randomized controlled trial examined whether a mindfulness-based intervention could produce measurable changes in Otrovert personality orientation, an emergent construct conceptualized as adaptive self-regulation and independence from group-based identity. The findings provide clear evidence that participants who received the mindfulness intervention demonstrated a significant increase in Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS) scores, whereas participants in the control group showed no meaningful change over the same period. Specifically, the intervention group exhibited a mean increase of 6.6 points in OOS scores from baseline (M = 36.2) to post-intervention (M = 42.8), accompanied by a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.2). In contrast, the control group showed a negligible change (d = 0.1). The significant Group × Time interaction observed in the repeated measures analysis further confirms that these changes were attributable to the mindfulness-based intervention rather than to natural variation or testing effects. These results support the rejection of all three null hypotheses proposed in the study. The observed findings suggest that Otrovert orientation is not a static personality disposition but rather a modifiable psychological orientation responsive to experiential training. Mindfulness practices emphasize present-moment awareness, reflective observation, and reduced reliance on external validation, all of which conceptually align with the defining characteristics of the Otrovert construct as articulated by Kaminski ( 2025 ). The significant post-intervention increase in OOS scores indicates that structured mindfulness training may actively cultivate these adaptive capacities. From a theoretical standpoint, the present results contribute to emerging perspectives that view certain personality orientations as process-based and developmentally malleable rather than fixed traits. While traditional personality models often emphasize stability, the current findings demonstrate that targeted psychological interventions can influence orientations related to autonomy, attentional flexibility, and self-directed engagement. This aligns with contemporary mindfulness literature suggesting that sustained attentional and reflective practices can reshape cognitive–emotional patterns over time (Creswell, 2017 ; Hölzel et al., 2021 ). Importantly, the absence of significant baseline differences between groups strengthens the internal validity of the findings. The use of ANCOVA further confirms that post-intervention differences remained significant even after controlling for baseline OOS scores, underscoring the robustness of the intervention effect. Together, these results position mindfulness-based interventions as viable tools not only for symptom-focused outcomes but also for fostering adaptive personality orientations such as Otrovert orientation. Overall, the study extends mindfulness research by empirically demonstrating that an emergent personality construct can be systematically influenced through intervention within a randomized controlled framework. This finding opens new avenues for integrating personality-oriented outcomes into intervention science and highlights the relevance of mindfulness practices in supporting adaptive psychological functioning beyond traditional clinical endpoints. 8. IMPLICATIONS 8.1 Clinical and Intervention Implications The findings of the present randomized controlled trial demonstrate that mindfulness-based interventions can produce statistically significant changes in personality orientation, as reflected by the 6.6-point increase in mean Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS) scores observed in the intervention group. This magnitude of change suggests that personality orientations associated with adaptive self-regulation and autonomous engagement may be responsive to structured mindfulness training. From a clinical and intervention perspective, these results indicate that mindfulness-based programs may extend their utility beyond symptom-focused outcomes and contribute to developmental changes in personality-related functioning. The use of the OOS as a baseline screening tool may assist practitioners in identifying individuals who could benefit from interventions aimed at fostering adaptive orientation and reflective awareness. 8.2 Implications for Research and Theory Development The statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups, even after controlling for baseline OOS scores, highlight the relevance of integrating emergent personality constructs into intervention research. The present findings provide empirical support for conceptualizing Otrovert orientation as a modifiable psychological orientation rather than a fixed trait. For theory development, these results support contemporary models that emphasize the malleability of personality-related processes through experiential and attentional training. Future research may further investigate how mindfulness-based interventions interact with baseline personality orientation to influence the degree and durability of change. 8.3 Educational and Organizational Implications The observed improvement in Otrovert orientation following mindfulness training suggests potential applicability in educational and organizational settings where adaptive engagement, autonomy, and self-directed functioning are valued. The increase in post-intervention OOS scores indicates enhanced capacity for balanced internal awareness and contextual responsiveness. Educational institutions and organizations may consider incorporating mindfulness-based modules as developmental interventions aimed at cultivating adaptive personality orientations, rather than limiting their use to stress management or performance enhancement programs. 8.4 Measurement and Methodological Implications The ability of the Otrovert Orientation Scale to detect meaningful pre–post changes within a randomized controlled framework supports its preliminary utility as a research instrument. The scale demonstrated sensitivity to intervention effects by clearly differentiating outcomes between the mindfulness-based intervention group and the control group. Methodologically, this finding supports the inclusion of theoretically grounded, newly developed measures within intervention research, provided their use is clearly justified and transparently reported. Continued psychometric evaluation of the OOS across diverse populations will further strengthen its research applicability. 8.5 Policy and Program Design Implications At a broader level, the findings suggest that mindfulness-based interventions may be positioned as preventive and developmental programs rather than exclusively remedial approaches. The demonstrated change in personality orientation supports the inclusion of mindfulness training within mental health promotion and capacity-building frameworks. Program designers and policymakers may consider integrating mindfulness-based interventions in community, educational, and institutional contexts to support adaptive psychological functioning and autonomous engagement. 9. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS 9.1 Study Limitations Despite the strengths of the randomized controlled design, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, the sample was drawn from a relatively homogeneous demographic context, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to broader populations. Second, Otrovert orientation was assessed using a self-report measure administered at baseline and post-intervention. Although the OOS demonstrated sensitivity to change, self-report measures are inherently subject to response biases. Third, the study included only a single post-intervention assessment. As a result, the long-term stability of changes in Otrovert orientation could not be evaluated. 9.2 Measurement-Related Limitations Given the emergent status of the Otrovert construct, the OOS represents an initial operationalization rather than a fully standardized instrument. While the scale successfully captured intervention-related change, further validation—such as factor structure examination and test–retest reliability—is required. Additionally, the absence of behavioral or observer-rated measures limits the assessment to subjective reporting. 9.3 Directions for Future Research Future studies should replicate these findings using larger and more diverse samples to enhance external validity. Longitudinal designs incorporating multiple follow-up assessments would help determine whether observed changes in Otrovert orientation are sustained over time. Further research may also explore whether baseline Otrovert orientation moderates responsiveness to mindfulness-based interventions, particularly among individuals with lower initial scores. 9.4 Methodological and Theoretical Extensions Future trials may benefit from mixed-methods designs that combine quantitative assessments with qualitative exploration of participants’ lived experiences. Theoretical refinement of the Otrovert construct is also necessary to clarify its distinction from existing personality frameworks and situate it within broader models of adaptive functioning. 10. CONCLUSION The present randomized controlled trial provides empirical evidence that mindfulness-based interventions can significantly influence personality-oriented outcomes, specifically the emergent construct of Otrovert personality orientation. Participants who received the mindfulness intervention demonstrated a meaningful increase in OOS scores, with a mean improvement of 6.6 points from baseline to post-intervention, while the control group showed no comparable change. These findings suggest that Otrovert orientation is not a static disposition but a modifiable psychological orientation responsive to structured experiential training. By integrating a novel personality construct within a randomized controlled design, the study advances understanding of how mindfulness-based interventions may contribute to adaptive personality development. Overall, the findings support the inclusion of personality-informed frameworks in intervention research and highlight the potential of mindfulness-based approaches as developmental tools for fostering adaptive psychological functioning. References Abdul Wahab N, Abdul Khaiyom JH (2025) The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Multicultural Settings: A Scoping Review. IIUM Med J Malaysia 24(01). https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v24i01.2589 Ahmadpour M, Khorand MT (2024) Comparing The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Electronic Muscle Stimulation on Balance, and Psychological Wellbeing in Elderly. AI and Tech. Behav Social Sci 2(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.2.1.2 Ahmed EA, Allah A, Elzeiny ES, H. H. A., Mohamed BES (2024) Effect of Mindfulness Training Program on Life Satisfaction and Resilience among Elderly People at Zagazig City Balish MA (2025) The Perceived Effectiveness of Mindfulness Practice in Enhancing Memory Function in Veterans. Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. 6485. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/6485 Banerjee A, Duflo E, Grela E, McKelway M, Schilbach F, Sharma G, Vaidyanathan G (2023) Depression and loneliness among the elderly in low-and middle-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(2), 179–202. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.37.2.179 Beck AT (2019) Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond, 3rd edn. Guilford Press Benavides-Gil G, Martínez-Zaragoza F, Fernández-Castro J, Sánchez-Pérez A, García-Sierra R (2024) Mindfulness-based interventions for improving mental health of frontline healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Syst reviews 13(1):160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02574-5 Beniusiene A, Kontautiene V, Strukcinskiene B, Grigoliene R, Martisauskiene D, Jurgaitis J (2024) Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Symptoms (DASS-21) in Elderly Women in Association with Health Status (SHSQ-25): A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthc (Basel Switzerland) 13(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13010007 Carlson LE, Beattie TL, Tamagawa R, Speca M, Faris P (2025) Mindfulness and Tai Chi interventions for mood improvement in cancer survivors: The MATCH trial. J Clin Oncol. https://ascopost.com/news/june-2025/mindfulness-and-tai-chi-interventions-for-mood-improvement-in-cancer-survivors-with-distress/ Chande S (2024) Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Programs on Chronic Pain Management in Elderly Patients in Tanzania. Am J Health Med Nurs Pract 10(2):12–23. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajhmn.1911 Chandran M, Vasudevan S, Iyer R (2024) Cultural adaptation of mindfulness practices: Effects on engagement and emotional well-being. J Cross-Cult Psychol 55(1):22–36 Chu L, Wang H, Zhao Y (2022) Mindfulness-based training reduces negative automatic thoughts among individuals with elevated anxiety. J Affect Disord 308:66–73 Corneliusson L, Gustafson Y, Olofsson B (2024) Prevalence of depressive disorders among the very old in the 21st century. J Affect Disord 362:706–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.062 Cregg DR, Cheavens JS (2022) The mediating role of acceptance in mindfulness-based interventions for emotional distress. Behav Ther 53(1):50–63 Creswell JD (2017) Mindfulness interventions. Ann Rev Psychol 68:491–516. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-042716-051139 Cruz A, Buenaventura RD, Mariano MPV (2025) Incidence Of Depressive And Anxiety Symptoms Among Elderly Filipinos During The Covid-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Cross- Sectional Study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 28(Suppl 1):i333. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyae059.59 Das M, Mondal NC, Chaudhuri A, Saldanha D (2024) A Study to Observe the Impact of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels on the Cardiovascular Profile in Elderly Patients Attending a Peripheral Medical College of a Developing Country. J Sci Soc 51(2):198–203. https://journals.lww.com/jsci/fulltext/2024/51020/a_study_to_observe_the_impact_of_depression,.13.aspx Doucerain MM, Benkirane S (2025) Mindfulness as a moderator of associations between intergroup bias and psychological health: A scoping review. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000731 . Advance online publication Duan L, Zhang S, Yan Q, Hu X (2025) Comparative Efficacy of Different Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats for Depression in Patients With Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Psycho-oncology 34(1):e70078. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70078 Davis AK, Barrett FS, Griffiths RR (2023) Mindfulness-based interventions for depression and anxiety: A systematic update. Clin Psychol Rev 99:102239 Falahi F, Parandin S, Valizadeh H (2024) Comparison of the effectiveness of treatment based on acceptance and commitment and therapy based on mindfulness on death anxiety and loneliness of the elderly. J Mod Psychol Researches 19(74):221–232. https://doi.org/10.22034/jmpr.2024.59381.5949 Fissler M, Winnebeck E, Schroeter TA, Gärtner M, Barnhofer T (2020) Brief mindfulness training and its effects on interoception and stress regulation. Biol Psychol 156:107951 Fredrickson BL (2020) Broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions: New developments and applications. Am Psychol 75(5):617–630 Garg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2025) The role of a 10-week mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention in managing depression, anxiety, and stress among the elderly: A quasi-experimental study. J Neonatal Surg 14(21S):500–513. https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i21S.5344 Garg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2024) The therapeutic role of mindfulness and cognitive behaviour therapy for elderly mental health: A comprehensive systematic review with meta-analysis. Indian J Clin Psychol 51(1–2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16018478 Garg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2024) Mindfulness meets aging: The transformative power of mindfulness and cognitive behavioral interventions for mental health in the golden years. Indian J Psychology Book No 20:1–XX Garg R (2025) Integrating Indian knowledge systems into mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral therapy: A holistic approach to enhancing mental well-being in higher education. In: Ch V, Varalakshmi SZ, Mir PR, Dixit R, Hashmi, Ved P (eds) Transforming higher education through Indian knowledge systems, vol 2. South Asian Academic, Publications, pp 117–123. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14273553 Garg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2025) Group-Based mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral intervention for enhancing resilience and preventing depression and anxiety in at-risk elderly: A randomized controlled trial. J Rational-Emot Cognitive-Behav Ther 43., Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-025-00616-y Garg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2025) Evaluating the impact of mindfulness practices on depression, anxiety, and stress in geriatric populations: A randomised control trial. Learn Curve 14:39–47 Garg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2025) Comparative study of CBT and MBSR in managing geriatric depression, anxiety, and stress: An RCT. Phoenix International Multidisciplinary Research Journal , 526–542. ISSN: 2583–6897. ISBN: 978-93-6851–977–5 Garg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2025) Rewiring the Aging Mind: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Transformative Impact of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy on Depression and Anxiety. Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health . Retrieved from https://www.informaticsjournals.co.in/index.php/JEOH/article/view/49565 Ginanjar Y, Nurhayati N, Anggraini D, Khasanah U, Anwar S, Rahman IA (2024) Application of mindfulness therapy in reducing depression levels in the elderly. Sci Midwifery 12(3):1387–1391 Goldberg SB, Riordan KM, Sun S, Davidson RJ (2022) The impact of mindfulness-based interventions on emotion regulation: A meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 94:102156 Gu Z, Li B, OuYang L, Wu H (2024) Improving cancer-related fatigue and psychological variables with online mindfulness-based stress reduction in cervical cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Women’s Health 24(1):525. https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/ 10.1186/s12905-024-03368-6 Guo L (2024) The Correlation Between Mindfulness, Decentering, and Psychological Problems: A Structural Equation Modeling Meta-Analysis. Mindfulness, pp 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02395-6 Gupta G, Rawat VP (2024) Do Mindfulness and Psychological well-being improve in old age? Exploring Gender Differences. Mind Soc 13(01):16–22. https://doi.org/10.56011/mind-mri-131-20242 Hassan R, Malik S (2024) Spiritual mindfulness practices and their impact on emotional well-being: A cross-cultural study. J Mental Health Relig 19(2):134–147 Herdian H, Estria SR, Setyawati R, Dewi DSE (2024) Mindfulness Therapy Training: Efforts to Improve Mental Health of the Elderly in the Elderly Of Pimpinan Daerah Aisyiyah Banyumas Organization. International Journal of Community Service Implementation, 2(2) Ho RH, Wong SY, Kwok A (2024) Decentering as a key mechanism of mindfulness: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Mindfulness 15(3):612–628 Hölzel BK, Lazar SW, Ott U (2021) Mechanisms of mindfulness: A review and updated framework. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews 123:1–14 Hsiung Y, Chen YH, Lin LC, Wang YH (2023) Effects of Mindfulness-Based Elder Care (MBEC) on symptoms of depression and anxiety and spiritual well-being of institutionalized seniors with disabilities: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 23:497. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04220-6 Hu C, Zhang CQ, Liu J, Gan Y (2025) The resilience instrument for older adults: scale development and preliminary validation. Cogent Psychol 12(1):2460855 Hu X, Wang Y, Zhang Q (2023) Decentering mediates the effects of mindfulness training on rumination and negative emotion: A longitudinal study. J Affect Disord 329:247–255 Javadzade N, Esmaeili SV, Omranifard V, Zargar F (2024) Effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program on depression, emotion regulation, and sleep problems: A randomized controlled trial study on depressed elderly. BMC Public Health 24(1):271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17759-9 Kabat-Zinn J (2020) Mindfulness for all: The wisdom to transform the world. Hachette Books Kabat-Zinn J (2023) Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. Hachette UK Kaminski R (2025) The gift of not belonging: How outsiders thrive in a world of joiners. Scribe Kaminski R (2025) The Otrovert Orientation Scale: Conceptualization and development of a new personality construct. J Contemp Psychiatry 18(2):101–112 Kral TR, Schuyler BS, Mumford JA, Rosenkranz MA, Davidson RJ (2019) Impact of mindfulness training on amygdala activity during emotional processing. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 14(1):47–57 Kumar S, Verma P, Sharma N (2022) Mindfulness-based interventions and reduction of rumination among adults with depressive symptoms. J Affect Sci 10:55–63 Latuheru G (2024) The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Reducing the Level of Anxiety Facing Death in The Elderly. J Humanit Social Stud 2(01):192–207. https://humasjournal.my.id/index.php/HJ/article/view/237 Lenouvel E, Ullrich P, Siemens W, Dallmeier D, Denkinger M, Kienle G, Zijlstra GAR, Hauser K, Klöppel S (2023) Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with and without exercise to reduce fear of falling in older people living in the community. Cochrane database Syst reviews 11. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/ 10.1002/14651858.CD014666.pub2/abstract Li P, Mao L, Hu M, Lu Z, Yuan X, Zhang Y, Hu Z (2022) Mindfulness on Rumination in Patients with Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(23):16101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316101 Li SYH, Bressington D (2019) The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on depression, anxiety, and stress in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs 28(3):635–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12568 Lim ML, Tran M, van Schooten KS, Radford KA, O’Dea B, Baldwin P, Delbaere K (2023) A self-guided online cognitive behavioural therapy to reduce fear of falling in older people: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Med 30(3):455–462. https://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/s12529-022-10105-6 Lindsay EK, Creswell JD (2021) Mechanisms of mindfulness training: Monitoring and acceptance theory. Curr Opin Psychol 40:69–75 Lindayani L, Hendra A, Juniarni L, Nurdina G (2020) Effectiveness of Mindfulness based stress reduction on Depression in Elderly: a systematic review. J Nurs Pract 4(1):8–12. https://doi.org/10.30994/jnp.v4i1.101 Liu Y, Zhang J, He X (2023) Acceptance-based mindfulness practices and stress resilience: Evidence from psychophysiological markers. Mindfulness 14(3):457–468 Lin CY, Chen J, Yeh PL (2023) Mindfulness practice improves attentional control and reduces rumination: Evidence from neurocognitive markers. Mindfulness 14(2):310–322 Maisarah P, Febrina C (2024) Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on the Behavior of Elderly. Ikinary Health Sci J 1(1):28–38. https://ihsj.ikinaryprogressivepublisher.com/index.php/home/article/view/6 Mao L, Li P, Wu Y, Luo L, Hu M (2023) The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for ruminative thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Affect Disord 321:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.10.022 McLaughlin KA, Orr C, Green JG (2022) Mindfulness-based therapy and emotional well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Med 52(5):789–800 Nematillayevna SD, Temirpulotovich TB (2024) Prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders in elderly patients. Sci J Appl Med Sci 3(2):118–123 Parandin S (2024) The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Therapy on Resilience and Perceived Stress in Older Residents of Nursing Homes. Aging 9(4):419–436 Pepping CA, Leary M, Aldridge D (2024) Non-judgmental awareness as a predictor of daily emotional functioning: A mindfulness diary study. J Context Behav Sci 32:45–54 Robertson D, Gillanders D, Simpson J (2021) Stoic mindfulness training and psychological flexibility: A randomized controlled study. Cogn Therapy Res 45(6):1124–1138 Roemer L, Salters-Pedneault K, Mennin DS (2021) Emotion regulation and anxiety: An updated review. Curr Psychiatry Rep 23(11):78–89 Sanchez-Lara E, Lozano-Ruiz A, Perez-Garcia M, Caracuel A (2022) Efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions in cognitive function in the elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Ment Health 26(9):1699–1709. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.1976724 Sahdra B, Ciarrochi J, Parker P (2021) Cross-cultural effectiveness of mindfulness: A review and theoretical framework. Curr Opin Psychol 41:53–59 Schumer MC, Lindsay EK, Creswell JD (2019) Brief mindfulness training improves attention and reduces stress reactivity: A randomized controlled experiment. Mindfulness 10(12):2471–2481 Seligman MEP (2019) Positive psychology: A personal history. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 15:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653 Sevinc G, Hölzel B, Lazar SW et al (2021) Mindfulness practice and functional connectivity changes in the default mode network. Front Hum Neurosci 15:667864 Srivastava D, Van Kessel R, Delgrange M, Cherla A, Sood H, Mossialos E (2023) A Framework for Digital Health Policy: Insights from Virtual Primary Care Systems Across Five Nations. PLOS Digit health 2(11):e0000382. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000382 Talukdar R, Talukdar R, Nath K, Lakshminarasimhan A (2024) Impact of Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) Technique on Depression, Anxiety and Stress among Elderly Residing in selected Old Age Homes in Guwahati, Kamrup (M) Assam. Int J Nurs Educ Res 12(4):261–264 Tang YY, Hölzel B, Posner MI (2020) Mindfulness meditation and anxiety reduction: A systematic review of neural mechanisms. Neurosci Lett 731:135030 Taren AA, Creswell JD, Gianaros PJ (2020) Neural mechanisms of mindfulness in emotional regulation. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews 118:1–12 Thin Hmwe NT, Chan CM, Nadeeka Shayamalie TG (2024) Older people's experiences of participation in mindfulness-based intervention programmes: A qualitative systematic review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 33(5):1272–1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13350 Treves IN, Tello L, Davidson RJ, Goldberg SB (2023) Effects of mindfulness on interoception: A pre-registered meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychol Bull 149(4):405–428 Wei S, Qin W, Yu Z, Zhang H, Li Y (2025) The effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on rumination and related psychological indicators: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychol 13:968. shttps://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/ 10.1186/s40359-025-03348-x Wu Y, Chen L, Zhang Q, Liu M (2025) Effects of online mindfulness-based stress reduction on psychological well-being: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 25:412. https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/ 10.1186/s12888-025-06012-1 Xia L, Liu H, Ren J (2025) A review of symptom, pathogenesis and treatment characteristics of the elderly with chronic insomnia. Medicine 104(5):e41346. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000041346 Xiang L, Wan H, Zhu Y (2025) Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on resilience among adult cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 25:204. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40050835 Ye J, Pan Y, Wu C, Hu Z, Wu S, Wang W, Guo J, Xiao A (2024) Effects of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy on Depression and Anxiety in Late Life: A Meta-Analysis. Alpha psychiatry 25(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231379 Zhang D, Lee EKP, Mak ECW, Ho CY, Wong SYS (2021) Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review. Br Med Bull 138(1):41–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab005 Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Files SupplementaryAggregatedDataOtrovertRCT.xlsx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8685569","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":579745375,"identity":"1f633cb5-032c-44c6-88e3-85732208bf79","order_by":0,"name":"Rachna Garg","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7794-2324","institution":"Amity University, Gwalior","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rachna","middleName":"","lastName":"Garg","suffix":""},{"id":579745376,"identity":"37d7b7b5-00a2-482f-ab64-3c28f907ae01","order_by":1,"name":"Dr. Shivani Goel","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0316-775X","institution":"ITS, Muradnagar","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"Dr.","firstName":"Shivani","middleName":"","lastName":"Goel","suffix":""},{"id":579745377,"identity":"96ef48bf-5a12-4d19-be48-ba61d27d2cc8","order_by":2,"name":"Sneha Goel","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5259-5757","institution":"BVIMR","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sneha","middleName":"","lastName":"Goel","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-01-24 09:45:47","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":true,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8685569/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8685569/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":101833899,"identity":"aa1b8f3b-e2a6-4a74-9d9c-0b63c6fe6c18","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 07:07:03","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":251458,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCONSORT Flow Diagram of Participant Recruitment, Allocation, and Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8685569/v1/c8faaba80dab7bbb06cc65b5.png"},{"id":101833905,"identity":"86eb0a73-07ba-48f3-884e-4b742431da76","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 07:07:03","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":192315,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePre–Post Changes in Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS) Scores Across Intervention and Control Groups\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8685569/v1/c8b0c78da59255c47486e2ad.png"},{"id":101881413,"identity":"5ea80293-3ee1-422f-bd77-f4f3caece707","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 15:12:01","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":187171,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eUnnumbered image in the Abstract section.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"un1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8685569/v1/4226050ababddfaf5625dc67.png"},{"id":101881822,"identity":"488a36a9-fb5b-4b43-8091-7d7bc8b924cb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 15:16:54","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":41561,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eUnnumbered image in the INTRODUCTION section.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"un2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8685569/v1/f90043981748cc9c689b693c.png"},{"id":101881381,"identity":"e697c46c-e102-4cb6-ab7f-8de14f581bc1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 15:11:48","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":28127,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eUnnumbered image in the REVIEW OF LITERATURE section.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"un3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8685569/v1/63541b1998c94df4622bb9b0.png"},{"id":101833902,"identity":"8ea0b842-b68c-41a3-bff2-62d1ab95000f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 07:07:03","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":28631,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eUnnumbered image in the REVIEW OF LITERATURE section.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"un4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8685569/v1/23fb8e84fc75966c1d12517a.png"},{"id":101880862,"identity":"b89a1311-7219-4719-ba1f-c70bd5d2cfac","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 15:07:12","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":49990,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eUnnumbered image in the METHODOLOGY section.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"un5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8685569/v1/98a516d3d816332429b8b58d.png"},{"id":101880857,"identity":"fc485215-8dd3-4a59-871f-5f53fd76a445","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 15:07:10","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":21952,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eUnnumbered image in the METHODOLOGY section.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"un6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8685569/v1/5a5b076f4065f63f17b3eff7.png"},{"id":101882526,"identity":"49ea1829-8bf4-4eda-82e0-a27ac46b8899","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 15:23:30","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1806838,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8685569/v1/041b9a36-c533-4ad5-a8c6-c5fc8e2ed138.pdf"},{"id":101833898,"identity":"7526c7fe-c74a-4e0f-a1e0-0e6d8a70f5da","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-04 07:07:03","extension":"xlsx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":10214,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryAggregatedDataOtrovertRCT.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8685569/v1/523ea7cc24c8e4863f757a3f.xlsx"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe Role of Otrovert Personality Orientation in Mindfulness-Based Intervention Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"1. INTRODUCTION","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eOtrovert Personality Orientation\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe concept of the \u003cem\u003eOtrovert\u003c/em\u003e was formally introduced by psychiatrist \u003cb\u003eDr. Rami Kaminski\u003c/b\u003e to describe a distinct personality orientation characterized by emotional independence from group identity and a persistent sense of not fully belonging to collective social structures. According to Kaminski, otroverts are socially capable and often form deep one-to-one relationships, yet experience discomfort, alienation, or resistance within group contexts, regardless of the group\u0026rsquo;s nature or composition (Kaminski, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). Unlike introverts, otroverts do not seek solitude to recharge, and unlike socially marginalized individuals, they are often accepted and even valued within groups but remain internally detached from collective norms. Kaminski emphasizes that the defining feature of the otrovert lies in autonomy of thought and self-worth that is not contingent upon group approval, positioning the construct as a unique personality orientation rather than a variant of introversion or social withdrawal.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Mindfulness-based interventions have emerged as a robust psychological approach for enhancing mental health and emotional well-being across diverse populations. Grounded in the cultivation of present-moment awareness and non-judgmental acceptance, mindfulness practices have demonstrated consistent benefits in reducing psychological distress and improving emotional regulation (Creswell, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Kabat-Zinn, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Zhang et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR84\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Meta-analytic and systematic evidence indicates that mindfulness-based programs contribute to improvements in depression, anxiety, stress, and overall psychological functioning through mechanisms such as attentional control, decentering, and acceptance (Goldberg et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Ho et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Wei et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). Despite this growing evidence base, substantial variability remains in individual responses to mindfulness-based interventions, suggesting the influence of person-level factors that are not yet fully understood.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent research has emphasized the importance of identifying moderators and mechanisms that explain differential outcomes in mindfulness-based programs. Studies have highlighted emotional regulation, resilience, interoceptive awareness, and psychological flexibility as central processes underlying mindfulness-related change (H\u0026ouml;lzel et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Treves et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Guo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Garg et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). However, while these mechanisms explain \u003cem\u003ehow\u003c/em\u003e mindfulness works, they do not fully account for \u003cem\u003ewhy\u003c/em\u003e individuals vary in their engagement and benefit from such interventions. Traditional personality models, particularly the introversion\u0026ndash;extroversion continuum, offer limited explanatory power in this context, as mindfulness engagement often reflects situational adaptability rather than fixed dispositional tendencies (Sahdra et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Pepping et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn response to these conceptual limitations, contemporary psychological discourse has begun to explore alternative personality orientations that emphasize adaptive self-regulation and contextual responsiveness. One such emerging construct is Otrovert, introduced by Kaminski (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e), which conceptualizes personality orientation as a flexible balance between internal awareness and external engagement. Rather than categorizing individuals into stable personality types, the Otrovert framework emphasizes context-sensitive behavioral regulation, mindful choice, and psychological adaptability. This perspective aligns closely with theoretical models of mindfulness that prioritize monitoring, acceptance, and adaptive responding to situational demands (Lindsay \u0026amp; Creswell, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Robertson et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Mindfulness research increasingly supports the view that adaptive engagement with internal experiences and external contexts enhances emotional well-being and resilience. Empirical findings indicate that mindfulness practices facilitate decentering from negative cognitions, reduce rumination, and promote balanced emotional responding (Li et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Mao et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Hu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). These outcomes are particularly relevant to the Otrovert construct, which emphasizes the capacity to shift flexibly between inward reflection and outward interaction. From this perspective, individuals with higher Otrovert orientation may be more receptive to mindfulness-based interventions due to their inherent adaptability and self-regulatory tendencies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite the conceptual relevance of Otrovert to mindfulness theory, empirical research examining this construct within intervention frameworks remains absent. Existing randomized controlled trials have primarily focused on the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions across clinical and non-clinical populations, with limited attention to emerging personality orientations as potential moderators of intervention outcomes (Davis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Wu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR80\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). This gap highlights the need for methodologically rigorous studies that integrate innovative personality constructs into established intervention models. Randomized controlled trials, in particular, offer a robust design for examining both intervention effectiveness and individual difference variables within controlled conditions (Gu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Carlson et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTherefore, the present study aims to address this gap by examining the role of Otrovert personality orientation in mindfulness-based intervention outcomes using a randomized controlled trial design. By integrating an emerging personality framework with evidence-based mindfulness practices, this study seeks to advance understanding of individual variability in psychological intervention outcomes. Such integration holds theoretical significance for personality and mindfulness research and practical relevance for the personalization of psychological interventions.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Mindfulness-Based Interventions and Psychological Outcomes\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been widely examined for their effectiveness in improving psychological well-being and reducing emotional distress. Conceptually rooted in present-moment awareness and non-reactivity, MBIs facilitate a shift in individuals\u0026rsquo; relationship with thoughts and emotions rather than attempting to modify content directly (Creswell, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Kabat-Zinn, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Empirical evidence consistently demonstrates that mindfulness practices contribute to reductions in stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms while enhancing emotional balance and subjective well-being (Zhang et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR84\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Goldberg et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent randomized controlled trials and meta-analytic studies have further strengthened the evidence base by highlighting mindfulness-related improvements in attentional regulation, emotional awareness, and adaptive coping (Ho et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Wei et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). These psychological shifts are not merely symptomatic changes but reflect deeper regulatory processes that enable individuals to respond more flexibly to internal and external demands. Such findings underscore mindfulness as a process-oriented intervention that supports sustainable psychological functioning rather than short-term symptom relief (Garg et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness Outcomes\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBeyond outcome efficacy, contemporary mindfulness research has increasingly focused on identifying the mechanisms through which MBIs exert their effects. Emotional regulation, decentering, psychological flexibility, and resilience have emerged as central pathways linking mindfulness practice to improved mental health (Lindsay \u0026amp; Creswell, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Guo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). These mechanisms emphasize the ability to observe internal experiences without excessive identification or avoidance, thereby reducing maladaptive emotional reactivity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudies suggest that individuals who develop stronger self-regulatory capacities through mindfulness demonstrate improved tolerance for distress and enhanced cognitive-emotional balance (Hu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Mao et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). However, despite these advances, the literature acknowledges that not all participants benefit equally from mindfulness-based programs. Differences in engagement, adherence, and experiential openness indicate the presence of moderating variables that influence intervention responsiveness (Goldberg et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Pepping et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Personality Factors and Variability in Mindfulness Engagement\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePersonality characteristics have long been considered relevant to psychological intervention outcomes. Traditional personality frameworks, particularly those derived from trait-based models such as introversion and extroversion, have been applied to understand mindfulness engagement with mixed findings. While introverted tendencies have sometimes been associated with reflective practices, extroverted traits may facilitate group-based participation and verbal sharing (Sahdra et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Nevertheless, these dichotomous classifications often fail to capture the situational flexibility required for effective mindfulness practice.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent scholarship argues that mindfulness engagement is less dependent on static personality traits and more influenced by adaptive self-regulatory orientations (Robertson et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Li et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). This perspective aligns with evidence suggesting that mindfulness cultivates the capacity to shift between internal awareness and external responsiveness based on contextual demands. Consequently, researchers have called for the exploration of personality constructs that move beyond fixed trait continua and instead emphasize dynamic, context-sensitive functioning.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4 Emergence of the Otrovert Personality Construct\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn response to limitations within conventional personality models, Kaminski (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e) introduced the Otrovert construct as an emerging personality orientation characterized by adaptive balance between inward reflection and outward engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Unlike introversion or extroversion, Otrovert orientation does not prioritize a dominant behavioral direction; rather, it emphasizes situational attunement, mindful self-regulation, and flexible engagement with environmental cues. This conceptualization reflects a shift toward personality frameworks that integrate adaptability and contextual awareness as core psychological strengths.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlthough empirical validation of Otrovert remains in its early stages, the construct aligns theoretically with mindfulness-based models that highlight monitoring, acceptance, and adaptive responding (Lindsay \u0026amp; Creswell, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). The emphasis on conscious modulation of attention and behavior suggests that individuals with higher Otrovert orientation may naturally resonate with mindfulness principles. However, the absence of intervention-based empirical studies represents a significant gap in the literature.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5 Need for Integrating Otrovert into Randomized Controlled Trials\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite the growing sophistication of mindfulness research, randomized controlled trials have rarely incorporated emerging personality constructs as moderators of intervention outcomes. Most RCTs focus on overall effectiveness while overlooking individual difference variables that may shape intervention responsiveness (Davis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Wu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR80\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). Integrating Otrovert orientation into an RCT framework offers a novel opportunity to examine whether adaptive personality orientations influence psychological change processes within mindfulness-based interventions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSuch integration is methodologically valuable, as RCT designs allow for causal inference while controlling for confounding variables (Gu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Conceptually, it advances mindfulness research by situating outcomes within a broader personality-based explanatory framework. Therefore, examining the role of Otrovert orientation within a randomized controlled mindfulness intervention addresses a critical gap in both personality and intervention research.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESES","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1 Objectives of the Study\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe present study was designed to examine the role of the emerging Otrovert personality orientation in shaping outcomes of a mindfulness-based intervention within a randomized controlled trial framework. While mindfulness-based interventions have demonstrated consistent psychological benefits, limited attention has been given to how adaptive personality orientations influence intervention responsiveness. In this context, the specific objectives of the study were as follows:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo compare pre\u0026ndash;post changes in Otrovert personality orientation between the mindfulness-based intervention group and the control group using a randomized controlled trial design.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo assess the magnitude of change in Otrovert personality orientation from baseline to post-intervention within the mindfulness-based intervention group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo examine differences in post-intervention Otrovert Orientation Scale scores between the intervention and control groups after controlling for baseline levels.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.2 Hypotheses of the Study\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on existing mindfulness literature and the conceptual framework of the Otrovert construct, the following hypotheses were formulated:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eH₀₁\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eThere is no significant difference in pre\u0026ndash;post changes in Otrovert personality orientation between participants in the mindfulness-based intervention group and those in the control group.\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eH₀₂\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eThere is no significant change in Otrovert personality orientation from baseline to post-intervention among participants who received the mindfulness-based intervention.\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eH₀₃\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eThere is no significant difference in post-intervention Otrovert Orientation Scale scores between the mindfulness-based intervention group and the control group after controlling for baseline scores.\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. METHODOLOGY","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1 Research Design\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe present study employed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design to examine the impact of a mindfulness-based intervention on psychological outcomes, with Otrovert personality orientation examined as an individual difference variable. Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a wait-list control group. The study followed CONSORT guidelines for randomized trials.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2 Participants\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA total of 120 participants were assessed for eligibility through initial screening. Of these, 100 participants met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study. Participants were adults aged 18\u0026ndash;35 years, recruited from educational institutions and community settings. Individuals with prior formal mindfulness training or current psychiatric treatment were excluded.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.3 Randomization Procedure\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants were randomly assigned using a computer-generated randomization sequence into two groups:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRandomization was conducted by an independent researcher to minimize allocation bias.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.4 Intervention\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe intervention group received a structured mindfulness-based intervention program delivered over 8 sessions. The program focused on cultivating present-moment awareness, non-judgmental observation of thoughts and emotions, mindful breathing, and adaptive attention regulation. Sessions included guided mindfulness practices, brief reflective exercises, and structured discussions aimed at enhancing emotional awareness and self-regulation. Participants were encouraged to engage in brief daily mindfulness practices between sessions to reinforce learning.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe control group did not receive the mindfulness intervention during the study period and continued with their routine activities. This design allowed for a comparison of psychological outcomes attributable specifically to the mindfulness-based intervention.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.5 Tools and Measures\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eOtrovert Orientation Scale (OOS)\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOtrovert personality orientation was assessed using the Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS), a self-report measure developed to capture adaptive self-regulation, contextual responsiveness, and balanced engagement between internal awareness and external interaction (Kaminski, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). The scale consists of 10 items rated on a Likert-type format, with higher scores indicating stronger Otrovert orientation. The scale was administered at baseline to assess individual personality orientation prior to intervention exposure.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOtrovert personality orientation was assessed using the Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS), a self-report measure developed to assess adaptive self-regulation, contextual responsiveness, and balanced engagement between internal awareness and external interaction (Kaminski, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). The scale consists of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree), with higher scores indicating stronger Otrovert orientation. The scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency in the present study (Cronbach\u0026rsquo;s α\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;.82).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.6 Procedure\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e After obtaining informed consent, participants completed the baseline assessment, including the Otrovert Orientation Scale. The intervention group then participated in an 8-week mindfulness-based program, consisting of weekly guided sessions and daily home practice. The control group did not receive any intervention during this period. Post-intervention assessments were conducted at the end of the 8th week using the same measures.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.7 Ethical Considerations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eEthical approval\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003e for the study was obtained from the appropriate institutional review committee. Participation was voluntary, and participants were informed of their right to withdraw at any stage without penalty. Confidentiality and anonymity were strictly maintained throughout the research process. All procedures adhered to established ethical guidelines for psychological research involving human participants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"5. DATA ANALYSIS PLAN","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe dataset was first examined for completeness, outliers, and normality to ensure suitability for parametric testing. Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, were calculated to summarize participant demographics and baseline Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS) scores.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo test H₀₁ \u0026mdash; that there is no significant difference in pre\u0026ndash;post changes in Otrovert orientation between the mindfulness-based intervention group and the control group \u0026mdash; a mixed-design repeated measures ANOVA was conducted. This analysis compared the change over time (pre-test to post-test) across the two groups, allowing assessment of intervention-related effects while accounting for baseline equivalence.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo test H₀₂ \u0026mdash; that there is no significant change in Otrovert orientation within the intervention group \u0026mdash; a paired-sample t-test was performed, comparing pre-test and post-test scores within participants in the intervention group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo test H₀₃ \u0026mdash; that there is no significant difference in post-intervention Otrovert scores between the intervention and control groups after controlling for baseline levels \u0026mdash; an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted with baseline OOS scores entered as the covariate. This allowed for adjustment of any minor baseline differences and provided a clear estimate of the intervention effect.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffect sizes (Cohen\u0026rsquo;s d for paired comparisons and partial eta squared for ANOVA/ANCOVA) were calculated to determine the magnitude of observed effects, facilitating interpretation beyond statistical significance. All analyses were conducted using standard statistical software, with the level of significance set at p \u0026lt; .05. Results were reported following established guidelines for randomized controlled trials to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and clarity.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"6. RESULTS","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e6.1 Preliminary Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBefore hypothesis testing, the dataset was screened for completeness, outliers, and normality to ensure appropriateness for parametric analysis. Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, were computed for baseline and post-intervention OOS scores for both groups.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBaseline comparisons confirmed group equivalence. There were no significant differences between the intervention (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;47) and control group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;48) in age, gender, or baseline OOS scores (Intervention: M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36.2, SD\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5.3; Control: M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;35.9, SD\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5.1; p = .78), indicating successful randomization.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBaseline Characteristics of Participants (Place after this paragraph)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariable\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntervention (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;47)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;48)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ep-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAge (Mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25.1\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e.71\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGender (M/F)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23/24\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22/26\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e.84\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOOS Score (Mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e35.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e.78\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e6.2 Pre\u0026ndash;Post Intervention Outcomes\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eWithin-Group Analysis (H₀₂)\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA paired-sample t-test was conducted to examine pre\u0026ndash;post changes within the intervention group. The intervention group showed a significant increase in OOS scores from M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36.2, SD\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5.3 at baseline to M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;42.8, SD\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4.9 post-intervention (t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;6.91, p \u0026lt; .001, Cohen\u0026rsquo;s d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.2), indicating a meaningful improvement in Otrovert orientation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe control group did not demonstrate a significant change (Pre: M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;35.9, SD\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5.1; Post: M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36.4, SD\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5.0; t\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.88, p = .38, d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre\u0026ndash; and Post-Test OOS Scores (Place after this paragraph)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGroup\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-Test Mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePost-Test Mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003et-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ep-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCohen\u0026rsquo;s d\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntervention\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.91\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e35.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.88\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e.38\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eNote\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eThe solid line represents the mindfulness-based intervention group, and the dashed line represents the control group. Values indicate mean Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS) scores at pre-test and post-test. A marked increase in OOS scores is observed in the intervention group, whereas the control group shows minimal change over time.\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eBetween-Group Analysis (H₀₁ \u0026amp; H₀₃)\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA repeated measures ANOVA comparing pre\u0026ndash;post changes across intervention and control groups revealed a significant Group \u0026times; Time interaction (F(1,93)\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;45.6, p \u0026lt; .001, partial η\u0026sup2; = .33), confirming that the mindfulness intervention produced greater improvements in Otrovert orientation compared to the control group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdditionally, an ANCOVA was performed to compare post-test OOS scores between groups while controlling for baseline scores. The intervention group had significantly higher adjusted post-test scores (M_adj\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;42.7) than the control group (M_adj\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36.5; F(1,92)\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;48.3, p \u0026lt; .001, partial η\u0026sup2; = .34), supporting the effectiveness of the intervention after accounting for baseline levels.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e6.3 Effect Sizes\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffect size calculations demonstrated large intervention effects for OOS scores (Cohen\u0026rsquo;s d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.2 for within-group intervention comparison; partial η\u0026sup2; = .33 for repeated measures ANOVA). The control group showed negligible effect sizes (d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis confirms that the observed changes are statistically significant and practically meaningful, providing strong support for rejecting H₀₁, H₀₂, and H₀₃.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"7. DISCUSSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe present randomized controlled trial examined whether a mindfulness-based intervention could produce measurable changes in Otrovert personality orientation, an emergent construct conceptualized as adaptive self-regulation and independence from group-based identity. The findings provide clear evidence that participants who received the mindfulness intervention demonstrated a significant increase in Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS) scores, whereas participants in the control group showed no meaningful change over the same period.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpecifically, the intervention group exhibited a mean increase of 6.6 points in OOS scores from baseline (M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36.2) to post-intervention (M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;42.8), accompanied by a large effect size (Cohen\u0026rsquo;s d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.2). In contrast, the control group showed a negligible change (d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.1). The significant Group \u0026times; Time interaction observed in the repeated measures analysis further confirms that these changes were attributable to the mindfulness-based intervention rather than to natural variation or testing effects. These results support the rejection of all three null hypotheses proposed in the study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe observed findings suggest that Otrovert orientation is not a static personality disposition but rather a modifiable psychological orientation responsive to experiential training. Mindfulness practices emphasize present-moment awareness, reflective observation, and reduced reliance on external validation, all of which conceptually align with the defining characteristics of the Otrovert construct as articulated by Kaminski (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). The significant post-intervention increase in OOS scores indicates that structured mindfulness training may actively cultivate these adaptive capacities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a theoretical standpoint, the present results contribute to emerging perspectives that view certain personality orientations as process-based and developmentally malleable rather than fixed traits. While traditional personality models often emphasize stability, the current findings demonstrate that targeted psychological interventions can influence orientations related to autonomy, attentional flexibility, and self-directed engagement. This aligns with contemporary mindfulness literature suggesting that sustained attentional and reflective practices can reshape cognitive\u0026ndash;emotional patterns over time (Creswell, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; H\u0026ouml;lzel et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImportantly, the absence of significant baseline differences between groups strengthens the internal validity of the findings. The use of ANCOVA further confirms that post-intervention differences remained significant even after controlling for baseline OOS scores, underscoring the robustness of the intervention effect. Together, these results position mindfulness-based interventions as viable tools not only for symptom-focused outcomes but also for fostering adaptive personality orientations such as Otrovert orientation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, the study extends mindfulness research by empirically demonstrating that an emergent personality construct can be systematically influenced through intervention within a randomized controlled framework. This finding opens new avenues for integrating personality-oriented outcomes into intervention science and highlights the relevance of mindfulness practices in supporting adaptive psychological functioning beyond traditional clinical endpoints.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"8. IMPLICATIONS","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec26\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e8.1 Clinical and Intervention Implications\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe findings of the present randomized controlled trial demonstrate that mindfulness-based interventions can produce statistically significant changes in personality orientation, as reflected by the 6.6-point increase in mean Otrovert Orientation Scale (OOS) scores observed in the intervention group. This magnitude of change suggests that personality orientations associated with adaptive self-regulation and autonomous engagement may be responsive to structured mindfulness training.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom a clinical and intervention perspective, these results indicate that mindfulness-based programs may extend their utility beyond symptom-focused outcomes and contribute to developmental changes in personality-related functioning. The use of the OOS as a baseline screening tool may assist practitioners in identifying individuals who could benefit from interventions aimed at fostering adaptive orientation and reflective awareness.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec27\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e8.2 Implications for Research and Theory Development\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups, even after controlling for baseline OOS scores, highlight the relevance of integrating emergent personality constructs into intervention research. The present findings provide empirical support for conceptualizing Otrovert orientation as a modifiable psychological orientation rather than a fixed trait.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor theory development, these results support contemporary models that emphasize the malleability of personality-related processes through experiential and attentional training. Future research may further investigate how mindfulness-based interventions interact with baseline personality orientation to influence the degree and durability of change.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec28\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e8.3 Educational and Organizational Implications\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe observed improvement in Otrovert orientation following mindfulness training suggests potential applicability in educational and organizational settings where adaptive engagement, autonomy, and self-directed functioning are valued. The increase in post-intervention OOS scores indicates enhanced capacity for balanced internal awareness and contextual responsiveness.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEducational institutions and organizations may consider incorporating mindfulness-based modules as developmental interventions aimed at cultivating adaptive personality orientations, rather than limiting their use to stress management or performance enhancement programs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec29\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e8.4 Measurement and Methodological Implications\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ability of the Otrovert Orientation Scale to detect meaningful pre\u0026ndash;post changes within a randomized controlled framework supports its preliminary utility as a research instrument. The scale demonstrated sensitivity to intervention effects by clearly differentiating outcomes between the mindfulness-based intervention group and the control group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMethodologically, this finding supports the inclusion of theoretically grounded, newly developed measures within intervention research, provided their use is clearly justified and transparently reported. Continued psychometric evaluation of the OOS across diverse populations will further strengthen its research applicability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec30\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e8.5 Policy and Program Design Implications\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt a broader level, the findings suggest that mindfulness-based interventions may be positioned as preventive and developmental programs rather than exclusively remedial approaches. The demonstrated change in personality orientation supports the inclusion of mindfulness training within mental health promotion and capacity-building frameworks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eProgram designers and policymakers may consider integrating mindfulness-based interventions in community, educational, and institutional contexts to support adaptive psychological functioning and autonomous engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"9. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec32\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e9.1 Study Limitations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite the strengths of the randomized controlled design, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, the sample was drawn from a relatively homogeneous demographic context, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to broader populations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSecond, Otrovert orientation was assessed using a self-report measure administered at baseline and post-intervention. Although the OOS demonstrated sensitivity to change, self-report measures are inherently subject to response biases.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThird, the study included only a single post-intervention assessment. As a result, the long-term stability of changes in Otrovert orientation could not be evaluated.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec33\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e9.2 Measurement-Related Limitations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGiven the emergent status of the Otrovert construct, the OOS represents an initial operationalization rather than a fully standardized instrument. While the scale successfully captured intervention-related change, further validation\u0026mdash;such as factor structure examination and test\u0026ndash;retest reliability\u0026mdash;is required.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdditionally, the absence of behavioral or observer-rated measures limits the assessment to subjective reporting.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec34\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e9.3 Directions for Future Research\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture studies should replicate these findings using larger and more diverse samples to enhance external validity. Longitudinal designs incorporating multiple follow-up assessments would help determine whether observed changes in Otrovert orientation are sustained over time.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurther research may also explore whether baseline Otrovert orientation moderates responsiveness to mindfulness-based interventions, particularly among individuals with lower initial scores.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec35\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e9.4 Methodological and Theoretical Extensions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture trials may benefit from mixed-methods designs that combine quantitative assessments with qualitative exploration of participants\u0026rsquo; lived experiences. Theoretical refinement of the Otrovert construct is also necessary to clarify its distinction from existing personality frameworks and situate it within broader models of adaptive functioning.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"10. CONCLUSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe present randomized controlled trial provides empirical evidence that mindfulness-based interventions can significantly influence personality-oriented outcomes, specifically the emergent construct of Otrovert personality orientation. Participants who received the mindfulness intervention demonstrated a meaningful increase in OOS scores, with a mean improvement of 6.6 points from baseline to post-intervention, while the control group showed no comparable change.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese findings suggest that Otrovert orientation is not a static disposition but a modifiable psychological orientation responsive to structured experiential training. By integrating a novel personality construct within a randomized controlled design, the study advances understanding of how mindfulness-based interventions may contribute to adaptive personality development.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, the findings support the inclusion of personality-informed frameworks in intervention research and highlight the potential of mindfulness-based approaches as developmental tools for fostering adaptive psychological functioning.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbdul Wahab N, Abdul Khaiyom JH (2025) The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Multicultural Settings: A Scoping Review. IIUM Med J Malaysia 24(01). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v24i01.2589\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.31436/imjm.v24i01.2589\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAhmadpour M, Khorand MT (2024) Comparing The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Electronic Muscle Stimulation on Balance, and Psychological Wellbeing in Elderly. AI and Tech. Behav Social Sci 2(1):9\u0026ndash;17. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.2.1.2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.61838/kman.aitech.2.1.2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAhmed EA, Allah A, Elzeiny ES, H. H. A., Mohamed BES (2024) Effect of Mindfulness Training Program on Life Satisfaction and Resilience among Elderly People at Zagazig City\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBalish MA (2025) The Perceived Effectiveness of Mindfulness Practice in Enhancing Memory Function in Veterans. Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. 6485. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/6485\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/6485\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBanerjee A, Duflo E, Grela E, McKelway M, Schilbach F, Sharma G, Vaidyanathan G (2023) Depression and loneliness among the elderly in low-and middle-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(2), 179\u0026ndash;202. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.37.2.179\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.37.2.179\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBeck AT (2019) Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond, 3rd edn. Guilford Press\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBenavides-Gil G, Mart\u0026iacute;nez-Zaragoza F, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez-Castro J, S\u0026aacute;nchez-P\u0026eacute;rez A, Garc\u0026iacute;a-Sierra R (2024) Mindfulness-based interventions for improving mental health of frontline healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Syst reviews 13(1):160. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02574-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s13643-024-02574-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBeniusiene A, Kontautiene V, Strukcinskiene B, Grigoliene R, Martisauskiene D, Jurgaitis J (2024) Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Symptoms (DASS-21) in Elderly Women in Association with Health Status (SHSQ-25): A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthc (Basel Switzerland) 13(1):7. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13010007\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/healthcare13010007\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCarlson LE, Beattie TL, Tamagawa R, Speca M, Faris P (2025) Mindfulness and Tai Chi interventions for mood improvement in cancer survivors: The MATCH trial. J Clin Oncol. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://ascopost.com/news/june-2025/mindfulness-and-tai-chi-interventions-for-mood-improvement-in-cancer-survivors-with-distress/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://ascopost.com/news/june-2025/mindfulness-and-tai-chi-interventions-for-mood-improvement-in-cancer-survivors-with-distress/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChande S (2024) Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Programs on Chronic Pain Management in Elderly Patients in Tanzania. Am J Health Med Nurs Pract 10(2):12\u0026ndash;23. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.47672/ajhmn.1911\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.47672/ajhmn.1911\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChandran M, Vasudevan S, Iyer R (2024) Cultural adaptation of mindfulness practices: Effects on engagement and emotional well-being. J Cross-Cult Psychol 55(1):22\u0026ndash;36\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChu L, Wang H, Zhao Y (2022) Mindfulness-based training reduces negative automatic thoughts among individuals with elevated anxiety. J Affect Disord 308:66\u0026ndash;73\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorneliusson L, Gustafson Y, Olofsson B (2024) Prevalence of depressive disorders among the very old in the 21st century. J Affect Disord 362:706\u0026ndash;715. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.062\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.062\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCregg DR, Cheavens JS (2022) The mediating role of acceptance in mindfulness-based interventions for emotional distress. Behav Ther 53(1):50\u0026ndash;63\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCreswell JD (2017) Mindfulness interventions. Ann Rev Psychol 68:491\u0026ndash;516. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-042716-051139\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1146/annurev-psych-042716-051139\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCruz A, Buenaventura RD, Mariano MPV (2025) Incidence Of Depressive And Anxiety Symptoms Among Elderly Filipinos During The Covid-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Cross- Sectional Study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 28(Suppl 1):i333. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyae059.59\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/ijnp/pyae059.59\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDas M, Mondal NC, Chaudhuri A, Saldanha D (2024) A Study to Observe the Impact of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Levels on the Cardiovascular Profile in Elderly Patients Attending a Peripheral Medical College of a Developing Country. J Sci Soc 51(2):198\u0026ndash;203. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://journals.lww.com/jsci/fulltext/2024/51020/a_study_to_observe_the_impact_of_depression,.13.aspx\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://journals.lww.com/jsci/fulltext/2024/51020/a_study_to_observe_the_impact_of_depression,.13.aspx\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDoucerain MM, Benkirane S (2025) Mindfulness as a moderator of associations between intergroup bias and psychological health: A scoping review. Cultural Diversity \u0026amp; Ethnic Minority Psychology. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000731\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1037/cdp0000731\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Advance online publication\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDuan L, Zhang S, Yan Q, Hu X (2025) Comparative Efficacy of Different Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats for Depression in Patients With Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Psycho-oncology 34(1):e70078. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70078\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/pon.70078\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDavis AK, Barrett FS, Griffiths RR (2023) Mindfulness-based interventions for depression and anxiety: A systematic update. Clin Psychol Rev 99:102239\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFalahi F, Parandin S, Valizadeh H (2024) Comparison of the effectiveness of treatment based on acceptance and commitment and therapy based on mindfulness on death anxiety and loneliness of the elderly. J Mod Psychol Researches 19(74):221\u0026ndash;232. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.22034/jmpr.2024.59381.5949\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.22034/jmpr.2024.59381.5949\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFissler M, Winnebeck E, Schroeter TA, G\u0026auml;rtner M, Barnhofer T (2020) Brief mindfulness training and its effects on interoception and stress regulation. Biol Psychol 156:107951\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFredrickson BL (2020) Broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions: New developments and applications. Am Psychol 75(5):617\u0026ndash;630\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2025) The role of a 10-week mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention in managing depression, anxiety, and stress among the elderly: A quasi-experimental study. J Neonatal Surg 14(21S):500\u0026ndash;513. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i21S.5344\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.63682/jns.v14i21S.5344\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2024) The therapeutic role of mindfulness and cognitive behaviour therapy for elderly mental health: A comprehensive systematic review with meta-analysis. Indian J Clin Psychol 51(1\u0026ndash;2). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16018478\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5281/zenodo.16018478\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2024) Mindfulness meets aging: The transformative power of mindfulness and cognitive behavioral interventions for mental health in the golden years. Indian J Psychology Book No 20:1\u0026ndash;XX\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarg R (2025) Integrating Indian knowledge systems into mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral therapy: A holistic approach to enhancing mental well-being in higher education. In: Ch V, Varalakshmi SZ, Mir PR, Dixit R, Hashmi, Ved P (eds) Transforming higher education through Indian knowledge systems, vol 2. South Asian Academic, Publications, pp 117\u0026ndash;123. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14273553\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5281/zenodo.14273553\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2025) Group-Based mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral intervention for enhancing resilience and preventing depression and anxiety in at-risk elderly: A randomized controlled trial. J Rational-Emot Cognitive-Behav Ther 43., Article 47. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-025-00616-y\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10942-025-00616-y\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2025) Evaluating the impact of mindfulness practices on depression, anxiety, and stress in geriatric populations: A randomised control trial. Learn Curve 14:39\u0026ndash;47\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2025) Comparative study of CBT and MBSR in managing geriatric depression, anxiety, and stress: An RCT. \u003cem\u003ePhoenix International Multidisciplinary Research Journal\u003c/em\u003e, 526\u0026ndash;542. ISSN: 2583\u0026ndash;6897. ISBN: 978-93-6851\u0026ndash;977\u0026ndash;5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarg R, Awasthi S, Gupta N (2025) Rewiring the Aging Mind: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Transformative Impact of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy on Depression and Anxiety. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health\u003c/em\u003e. Retrieved from \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.informaticsjournals.co.in/index.php/JEOH/article/view/49565\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.informaticsjournals.co.in/index.php/JEOH/article/view/49565\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGinanjar Y, Nurhayati N, Anggraini D, Khasanah U, Anwar S, Rahman IA (2024) Application of mindfulness therapy in reducing depression levels in the elderly. Sci Midwifery 12(3):1387\u0026ndash;1391\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGoldberg SB, Riordan KM, Sun S, Davidson RJ (2022) The impact of mindfulness-based interventions on emotion regulation: A meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 94:102156\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGu Z, Li B, OuYang L, Wu H (2024) Improving cancer-related fatigue and psychological variables with online mindfulness-based stress reduction in cervical cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Women\u0026rsquo;s Health 24(1):525. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/s12905-024-03368-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12905-024-03368-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGuo L (2024) The Correlation Between Mindfulness, Decentering, and Psychological Problems: A Structural Equation Modeling Meta-Analysis. Mindfulness, pp 1\u0026ndash;23. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02395-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s12671-024-02395-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGupta G, Rawat VP (2024) Do Mindfulness and Psychological well-being improve in old age? Exploring Gender Differences. Mind Soc 13(01):16\u0026ndash;22. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.56011/mind-mri-131-20242\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.56011/mind-mri-131-20242\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHassan R, Malik S (2024) Spiritual mindfulness practices and their impact on emotional well-being: A cross-cultural study. J Mental Health Relig 19(2):134\u0026ndash;147\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHerdian H, Estria SR, Setyawati R, Dewi DSE (2024) Mindfulness Therapy Training: Efforts to Improve Mental Health of the Elderly in the Elderly Of Pimpinan Daerah Aisyiyah Banyumas Organization. International Journal of Community Service Implementation, 2(2)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHo RH, Wong SY, Kwok A (2024) Decentering as a key mechanism of mindfulness: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Mindfulness 15(3):612\u0026ndash;628\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eH\u0026ouml;lzel BK, Lazar SW, Ott U (2021) Mechanisms of mindfulness: A review and updated framework. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews 123:1\u0026ndash;14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHsiung Y, Chen YH, Lin LC, Wang YH (2023) Effects of Mindfulness-Based Elder Care (MBEC) on symptoms of depression and anxiety and spiritual well-being of institutionalized seniors with disabilities: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 23:497. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04220-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12877-023-04220-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHu C, Zhang CQ, Liu J, Gan Y (2025) The resilience instrument for older adults: scale development and preliminary validation. Cogent Psychol 12(1):2460855\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHu X, Wang Y, Zhang Q (2023) Decentering mediates the effects of mindfulness training on rumination and negative emotion: A longitudinal study. J Affect Disord 329:247\u0026ndash;255\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJavadzade N, Esmaeili SV, Omranifard V, Zargar F (2024) Effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program on depression, emotion regulation, and sleep problems: A randomized controlled trial study on depressed elderly. BMC Public Health 24(1):271. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17759-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12889-024-17759-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKabat-Zinn J (2020) Mindfulness for all: The wisdom to transform the world. Hachette Books\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKabat-Zinn J (2023) Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. Hachette UK\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKaminski R (2025) The gift of not belonging: How outsiders thrive in a world of joiners. Scribe\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKaminski R (2025) The Otrovert Orientation Scale: Conceptualization and development of a new personality construct. J Contemp Psychiatry 18(2):101\u0026ndash;112\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKral TR, Schuyler BS, Mumford JA, Rosenkranz MA, Davidson RJ (2019) Impact of mindfulness training on amygdala activity during emotional processing. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 14(1):47\u0026ndash;57\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKumar S, Verma P, Sharma N (2022) Mindfulness-based interventions and reduction of rumination among adults with depressive symptoms. J Affect Sci 10:55\u0026ndash;63\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLatuheru G (2024) The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Reducing the Level of Anxiety Facing Death in The Elderly. J Humanit Social Stud 2(01):192\u0026ndash;207. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://humasjournal.my.id/index.php/HJ/article/view/237\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://humasjournal.my.id/index.php/HJ/article/view/237\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLenouvel E, Ullrich P, Siemens W, Dallmeier D, Denkinger M, Kienle G, Zijlstra GAR, Hauser K, Kl\u0026ouml;ppel S (2023) Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with and without exercise to reduce fear of falling in older people living in the community. Cochrane database Syst reviews 11. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1002/14651858.CD014666.pub2/abstract\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/14651858.CD014666.pub2/abstract\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi P, Mao L, Hu M, Lu Z, Yuan X, Zhang Y, Hu Z (2022) Mindfulness on Rumination in Patients with Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(23):16101. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316101\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/ijerph192316101\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi SYH, Bressington D (2019) The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on depression, anxiety, and stress in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs 28(3):635\u0026ndash;656. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12568\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/inm.12568\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLim ML, Tran M, van Schooten KS, Radford KA, O\u0026rsquo;Dea B, Baldwin P, Delbaere K (2023) A self-guided online cognitive behavioural therapy to reduce fear of falling in older people: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Med 30(3):455\u0026ndash;462. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://link.springer.com/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://link.springer.com/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003earticle/10.1007/s12529-022-10105-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"article/10.1007/s12529-022-10105-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLindsay EK, Creswell JD (2021) Mechanisms of mindfulness training: Monitoring and acceptance theory. Curr Opin Psychol 40:69\u0026ndash;75\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLindayani L, Hendra A, Juniarni L, Nurdina G (2020) Effectiveness of Mindfulness based stress reduction on Depression in Elderly: a systematic review. J Nurs Pract 4(1):8\u0026ndash;12. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.30994/jnp.v4i1.101\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.30994/jnp.v4i1.101\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu Y, Zhang J, He X (2023) Acceptance-based mindfulness practices and stress resilience: Evidence from psychophysiological markers. Mindfulness 14(3):457\u0026ndash;468\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLin CY, Chen J, Yeh PL (2023) Mindfulness practice improves attentional control and reduces rumination: Evidence from neurocognitive markers. Mindfulness 14(2):310\u0026ndash;322\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMaisarah P, Febrina C (2024) Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on the Behavior of Elderly. Ikinary Health Sci J 1(1):28\u0026ndash;38. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://ihsj.ikinaryprogressivepublisher.com/index.php/home/article/view/6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://ihsj.ikinaryprogressivepublisher.com/index.php/home/article/view/6\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMao L, Li P, Wu Y, Luo L, Hu M (2023) The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for ruminative thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Affect Disord 321:83\u0026ndash;95. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.10.022\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jad.2022.10.022\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcLaughlin KA, Orr C, Green JG (2022) Mindfulness-based therapy and emotional well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Med 52(5):789\u0026ndash;800\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNematillayevna SD, Temirpulotovich TB (2024) Prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders in elderly patients. Sci J Appl Med Sci 3(2):118\u0026ndash;123\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eParandin S (2024) The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Therapy on Resilience and Perceived Stress in Older Residents of Nursing Homes. Aging 9(4):419\u0026ndash;436\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePepping CA, Leary M, Aldridge D (2024) Non-judgmental awareness as a predictor of daily emotional functioning: A mindfulness diary study. J Context Behav Sci 32:45\u0026ndash;54\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRobertson D, Gillanders D, Simpson J (2021) Stoic mindfulness training and psychological flexibility: A randomized controlled study. Cogn Therapy Res 45(6):1124\u0026ndash;1138\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRoemer L, Salters-Pedneault K, Mennin DS (2021) Emotion regulation and anxiety: An updated review. Curr Psychiatry Rep 23(11):78\u0026ndash;89\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSanchez-Lara E, Lozano-Ruiz A, Perez-Garcia M, Caracuel A (2022) Efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions in cognitive function in the elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Ment Health 26(9):1699\u0026ndash;1709. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.1976724\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13607863.2021.1976724\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSahdra B, Ciarrochi J, Parker P (2021) Cross-cultural effectiveness of mindfulness: A review and theoretical framework. Curr Opin Psychol 41:53\u0026ndash;59\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchumer MC, Lindsay EK, Creswell JD (2019) Brief mindfulness training improves attention and reduces stress reactivity: A randomized controlled experiment. Mindfulness 10(12):2471\u0026ndash;2481\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSeligman MEP (2019) Positive psychology: A personal history. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 15:1\u0026ndash;23. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSevinc G, H\u0026ouml;lzel B, Lazar SW et al (2021) Mindfulness practice and functional connectivity changes in the default mode network. Front Hum Neurosci 15:667864\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSrivastava D, Van Kessel R, Delgrange M, Cherla A, Sood H, Mossialos E (2023) A Framework for Digital Health Policy: Insights from Virtual Primary Care Systems Across Five Nations. PLOS Digit health 2(11):e0000382. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000382\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000382\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTalukdar R, Talukdar R, Nath K, Lakshminarasimhan A (2024) Impact of Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) Technique on Depression, Anxiety and Stress among Elderly Residing in selected Old Age Homes in Guwahati, Kamrup (M) Assam. Int J Nurs Educ Res 12(4):261\u0026ndash;264\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTang YY, H\u0026ouml;lzel B, Posner MI (2020) Mindfulness meditation and anxiety reduction: A systematic review of neural mechanisms. Neurosci Lett 731:135030\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTaren AA, Creswell JD, Gianaros PJ (2020) Neural mechanisms of mindfulness in emotional regulation. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews 118:1\u0026ndash;12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThin Hmwe NT, Chan CM, Nadeeka Shayamalie TG (2024) Older people's experiences of participation in mindfulness-based intervention programmes: A qualitative systematic review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 33(5):1272\u0026ndash;1288. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13350\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/inm.13350\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTreves IN, Tello L, Davidson RJ, Goldberg SB (2023) Effects of mindfulness on interoception: A pre-registered meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychol Bull 149(4):405\u0026ndash;428\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWei S, Qin W, Yu Z, Zhang H, Li Y (2025) The effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on rumination and related psychological indicators: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychol 13:968. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003eshttps://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://shttps://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/s40359-025-03348-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s40359-025-03348-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWu Y, Chen L, Zhang Q, Liu M (2025) Effects of online mindfulness-based stress reduction on psychological well-being: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 25:412. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/s12888-025-06012-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12888-025-06012-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXia L, Liu H, Ren J (2025) A review of symptom, pathogenesis and treatment characteristics of the elderly with chronic insomnia. Medicine 104(5):e41346. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000041346\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1097/MD.0000000000041346\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXiang L, Wan H, Zhu Y (2025) Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on resilience among adult cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 25:204. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40050835\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40050835\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYe J, Pan Y, Wu C, Hu Z, Wu S, Wang W, Guo J, Xiao A (2024) Effects of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy on Depression and Anxiety in Late Life: A Meta-Analysis. Alpha psychiatry 25(1):1\u0026ndash;8. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231379\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231379\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang D, Lee EKP, Mak ECW, Ho CY, Wong SYS (2021) Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review. Br Med Bull 138(1):41\u0026ndash;57. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab005\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/bmb/ldab005\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Amity University, Gwalior","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Mindfulness-based intervention, Otrovert personality, Emerging personality construct, Randomized controlled trial, Psychological well-being","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8685569/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8685569/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003ePersonality-based differences play a critical role in determining individual responsiveness to psychological interventions; however, traditional personality models often fail to explain variability in mindfulness-based outcomes. Recently, the Otrovert construct, proposed by Kaminski (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e), has emerged as a novel personality orientation emphasizing adaptive self-regulation and context-sensitive engagement beyond the introversion\u0026ndash;extroversion continuum. The present study aimed to examine the role of Otrovert orientation in influencing outcomes of a mindfulness-based intervention using a randomized controlled trial design. Participants were randomly assigned to either a mindfulness-based intervention group or a control group. Psychological outcomes related to well-being and emotional regulation were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Otrovert orientation was measured using a newly developed Otrovert Orientation Scale grounded in contemporary theoretical perspectives. Findings are expected to contribute empirical evidence supporting the relevance of emerging personality frameworks in mindfulness research. The study offers methodological and theoretical insights for integrating personality innovation into intervention research.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The Role of Otrovert Personality Orientation in Mindfulness-Based Intervention Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-02-04 07:06:58","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8685569/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"e89e5500-df6b-4532-a8eb-afc02ecb7115","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 4th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":61686929,"name":"Psychology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-04T07:06:58+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-02-04 07:06:58","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8685569","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8685569","identity":"rs-8685569","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}