Excitoprotective effects of conditional tau reduction in excitatory neurons and in adulthood

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,811 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Tau reduction is a promising therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer’s disease. In numerous models, tau reduction via genetic knockout is beneficial, at least in part due to protection against hyperexcitability and seizures, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Here we describe the generation and initial study of a new conditional Tauflox model to address these mechanisms. Given the protective effects of tau reduction against hyperexcitability, we compared the effects of selective tau reduction in excitatory or inhibitory neurons. Tau reduction in excitatory neurons mimicked the protective effects of global tau reduction, while tau reduction in inhibitory neurons had the opposite effect and increased seizure susceptibility. Since most prior studies used knockout mice lacking tau throughout development, we crossed Tauflox mice with inducible Cre mice and found beneficial effects of tau reduction in adulthood. Our findings support the effectiveness of tau reduction in adulthood and indicate that excitatory neurons may be a key site for its excitoprotective effects. SUMMARY A new conditional tau knockout model was generated to study the protective effects of tau reduction against hyperexcitability. Conditional tau reduction in excitatory, but not inhibitory, neurons was excitoprotective, and induced tau reduction in adulthood was excitoprotective without adverse effects. Competing Interest Statement EDR has received grants from NIH, Bluefield Project to Cure FTD, and the Alzheimers Drug Discovery Foundation and is site PI for clinical trials with Eisai and Lilly. He owns IP related to tau and received royalties from Genentech. He served as an advisor for AGTC, member of a data monitoring committee for Lilly, and member of an Editorial Board for the Society for Neuroscience.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00