Evolutionary-scale protein language models uncover beneficial variants in a Sorghum bicolor diversity panel

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,907 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Quantitative genetic approaches such as genome-wide association studies and genomic prediction are widely used to identify favourable genetic variation, but they have limited resolution due to linkage disequilibrium. Comparative genomics approaches, especially Protein Language Models (PLMs), have emerged as powerful alternatives, by detecting phylogenetic residue conservation (PRC) across evolutionary time scales. However, the extent to which these tools can guide the detection of impactful variants for field agronomic traits is still unclear. In this study, we used the pre-trained PLM ESM2 to predict PRC scores of nonsynonymous mutations segregating within a diverse panel of 387 accessions in sorghum (SAP). The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of the same set of nonsynonymous mutations was inferred using unfolded site frequency spectra to assess whether the DFE distribution covaried with PRC scores. Furthermore, we estimated the load of putatively nonneutral mutations of SAP accessions and evaluated associations between this mutation load and phenotypic performance across multiple agronomic traits. Our results show that ESM2 can detect mutations associated with fitness-enhancing effects in SAP, as indicated by enrichments in positive selection signatures among the variants with positive PRC scores. Significant associations were also detected between phenotypic performance and mutation load for several agronomic traits, indicating that PLMs can identify functionally important genetic variation. However, these signals were not consistent across all traits in the SAP population. Altogether, our findings suggest that large language models may support breeding efforts, as PLM predictions covaried with fitness effects and captured agronomic performance for some traits in plant populations. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00