Serum Metabolites as Diagnostic Biomarkers in Patients with Endometriosis

other OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-31

This study analyzed serum metabolite profiles in endometriosis patients, identifying ornithine and medorinone as potential non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers with higher diagnostic value than CA125.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-28 · read from full text

This case-control study investigated whether serum metabolites could serve as non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers for endometriosis by comparing 32 patients with the condition against 29 controls with other benign gynecological diseases. Using non-targeted metabolomic analysis, the researchers identified distinct metabolic profile alterations in endometriosis patients, specifically involving pathways such as arginine biosynthesis and glutathione metabolism. The analysis revealed that ornithine and medorinone levels differed significantly between groups, offering superior diagnostic potential compared to the standard marker CA125, although the authors note the need for larger cohorts to validate these findings. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically exploring novel serum-based metabolic biomarkers to improve diagnosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis diagnosis is usually delayed. The gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis is laparoscopy, which is invasive and accompanied by several risks. Currently, there are no effective non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosing endometriosis. Here, we investigated whether metabolites whose levels are altered in patients with endometriosis hold potential as diagnostic biomarkers for the disease. This case-control study involved 32 patients with endometriosis and 29 patients with other benign gynecological disease. The diagnosis of all patients was confirmed through postoperative histopathological examination, and the patients were divided into two groups: an endometriosis group (EM) and a control group. Fasting blood was collected and used for non-targeted metabolomic-based detection. The data were processed through principal component analysis, orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis, and significance analysis of microarrays. A univariate receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the metabolites. The metabolite profiles of patients with endometriosis were markedly different compared with those of the controls. In addition, several metabolic pathways, including biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, arginine biosynthesis, and glutathione metabolism, were altered. Ornithine and medorinone showed better potential as biomarkers for endometriosis diagnosis than CA125. We analyzed the altered metabolic profiles in patients with endometriosis and found ornithine and medorinone as potential non-invasive biomarkers for endometriosis diagnosis, whereas the combined ornithine-medorinone diagnosis is more valuable. These findings may help advance research on non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers for endometriosis. Further research with an improved study design and a larger cohort should be performed to confirm the diagnostic potential and clinical application of these biomarkers.
Full text 12,881 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Endometriosis diagnosis is usually delayed. The gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis is laparoscopy, which is invasive and accompanied by several risks. Currently, there are no effective non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosing endometriosis. Here, we investigated whether metabolites whose levels are altered in patients with endometriosis hold potential as diagnostic biomarkers for the disease. This case–control study involved 32 patients with endometriosis and 29 patients with other benign gynecological disease. The diagnosis of all patients was confirmed through postoperative histopathological examination, and the patients were divided into two groups: an endometriosis group (EM) and a control group. Fasting blood was collected and used for non-targeted metabolomic-based detection. The data were processed through principal component analysis, orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis, and significance analysis of microarrays. A univariate receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the metabolites. The metabolite profiles of patients with endometriosis were markedly different compared with those of the controls. In addition, several metabolic pathways, including biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, arginine biosynthesis, and glutathione metabolism, were altered. Ornithine and medorinone showed better potential as biomarkers for endometriosis diagnosis than CA125. We analyzed the altered metabolic profiles in patients with endometriosis and found ornithine and medorinone as potential non-invasive biomarkers for endometriosis diagnosis, whereas the combined ornithine-medorinone diagnosis is more valuable. These findings may help advance research on non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers for endometriosis. Further research with an improved study design and a larger cohort should be performed to confirm the diagnostic potential and clinical application of these biomarkers. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability The data generated in this study will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. New England J Med. 2020;382(13):1244–56. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1810764. França PRDC, Lontra ACP, Fernandes PD. Endometriosis: a disease with few direct treatment options. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;27(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27134034 Nnoaham KE, Hummelshoj L, Webster P, et al. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090 Taylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA. Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations. Lancet (London, England). 2021;397(10276):839–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00389-5. Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PMM, Farquhar C, et al. Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2016;2(2):CD009591. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2. Peter AW, Adamson GD, Al-Jefout M, et al. Research priorities for endometriosis: recommendations from a global consortium of investigators in endometriosis. Reproductive Sciences. 2017;24(2):202–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719116654991 Lu J, Ling X, Liu L, et al. Emerging hallmarks of endometriosis metabolism: a promising target for the treatment of endometriosis. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Molecular Cell Research, 2023;1870(1):119381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2022.119381 Li Q, Yuan M, Jiao X, et al. Metabolite profiles in the peritoneal cavity of endometriosis patients and mouse models. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(5):810–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.06.029. Tomkins NE, Girling JE, Boughton B, et al. Is there a role for small molecule metabolite biomarkers in the development of a diagnostic test for endometriosis? Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2022;68(2):89–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2022.2027045 Janša V, Pušić Novak M, Ban Frangež H, et al. TGFBI as a candidate biomarker for non-invasive diagnosis of early-stage endometriosis. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2023;38(7):1284–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead091. Shafrir AL, Farland LV, Shah DK, et al. Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: a critical epidemiologic review. Best Practice & Research Clin Obstetr Gynaecol. 2018;51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.001 Kieler M, Hofmann M, Schabbauer G. More than just protein building blocks: how amino acids and related metabolic pathways fuel macrophage polarization. FEBS J. 2021;288(12):3694–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15715. Anastasiu CV, Moga MA, Neculau AE, et al. Biomarkers for the noninvasive diagnosis of endometriosis: state of the art and future perspectives. Intl J Mol Sci. 2020;21(5):1750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051750 Tian Z, Chang X-H, Zhao Y, et al. Current biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis. Chinese Med J. 2020;133(19):2346–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001063. Chapron C, Marcellin L, Borghese B, et al. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nature Reviews. Endocrinology. 2019;15(11):666–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0245-z. Kimber-Trojnar Ż, Pilszyk A, Niebrzydowska M, et al. The potential of non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis of asymptomatic patients with endometriosis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(13):2762. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132762 Jiang H, Zhang X, Wu Y, et al. Bioinformatics identification and validation of biomarkers and infiltrating immune cells in endometriosis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:944683. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.944683. Moein Mahini S, Younesi M, Mortazavi G, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis: immunologic and genetic markers. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2023;538:70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2022.11.013 Yang H, Lau WB, Lau B, et al. A mass spectrometric insight into the origins of benign gynecological disorders. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2017;36(3):450–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21484. Sasamoto N, Zeleznik OA, Vitonis AF, et al. Presurgical blood metabolites and risk of postsurgical pelvic pain in young patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(6):1235–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.012. Hood RB, Liang D, Tan Y, et al. Characterizing the follicular fluid metabolome: quantifying the correlation across follicles and differences with the serum metabolome. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(5):970–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.07.023. Dutta M, Singh B, Joshi M, et al. Metabolomics reveals perturbations in endometrium and serum of minimal and mild endometriosis. Sci Reports. 2018;8(1):6466. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23954-7. Kusum K, Raj R, Rai S, et al. Elevated Circulatory Proline to Glutamine Ratio (PQR) in Endometriosis and Its Potential as a Diagnostic Biomarker. ACS Omega. 2022;7(17):14856–66. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c00332. Murgia F, Angioni S, D'alterio MN, et al. Metabolic profile of patients with severe endometriosis: a prospective experimental study. Reproductive Sciences. 2021;28(3):728–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00370-9 Johnson CH, Ivanisevic J, Siuzdak G. Metabolomics: beyond biomarkers and towards mechanisms. Nature Reviews Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(7):451–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.25 Goulielmos GN, Matalliotakis M, Matalliotaki C, et al. Endometriosis research in the -omics era. Gene. 2020;741:144545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.144545. Zhang T, Hu L, Tang J-F, et al. Metformin inhibits the urea cycle and reduces putrescine generation in colorectal cancer cell lines. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;26(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26071990 Chen C-L, Hsu S-C, Ann DK, et al. Arginine signaling and cancer metabolism. Cancers. 2021;13(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13143541 Martí i Líndez A-A, Reith W. Arginine-dependent immune responses. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2021;78(13):5303–5324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-021-03828-4 Hajji N, Garcia-Revilla J, Soto MS, et al. Arginine deprivation alters microglial polarity and synergizes with radiation to eradicate non-arginine-auxotrophic glioblastoma tumors. J Clin Invest. 2022;132 (6). https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI142137 Yeh K-Y, Wang C-H, Ling HH, et al. Pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score correlated with serum histidine level and three-year mortality of patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and optimal performance status. Nutrients. 2022;14 (17). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173475 Wang X, Xiang H, Toyoshima Y, et al. Arginase-1 inhibition reduces migration ability and metastatic colonization of colon cancer cells. Cancer Metab. 2023;11(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40170-022-00301-z. Wang H, Qin K, Shi D, et al. A new 68Ga-labeled ornithine derivative for PET imaging of ornithine metabolism in tumors. Amino Acids. 2023;55(5):595–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-023-03250-z. Gaetje R, Kotzian S, Herrmann G, et al. Nonmalignant epithelial cells, potentially invasive in human endometriosis, lack the tumor suppressor molecule E-cadherin. Am J Pathol. 1997;150(2):461–7. Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, et al. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2014;10(5):261–275. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2013.255 Pattison A, Astley N, Eason CT, et al. A comparison of the effects of three positive inotropic agents (amrinone, milrinone and medorinone) on platelet aggregation in human whole blood. Thrombosis Res. 1990;57(6):909–18.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Aksomics (Shanghai, China) for the support in LC-MS/MS and data analysis, and thank Ran Chu for assistance with data collection. Funding This study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2022YFC2704000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82301855), the Major Basic Research of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong (grant number ZR2021ZD34), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82071621), and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (grant number ZR2023QH186). The funders had not role in the design of the study; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and decision to submit the article for publication. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions Qiuju Li: conception and design of the study; collection of samples; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article. Le Xu: collection of samples; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; revising the article. Ying Lin: collection of samples, analysis and interpretation of data, revising the article. Ming Yuan: conception and design of the study, collection of samples, revising the article. Xue Jiao: collection of the samples, acquisition of data, revising the article. Qianhui Ren: collection of samples, acquisition of data, revising the article. Dong Li: conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, revising the article. Guoyun Wang: conception and design of the study, revising the article. All authors: final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflicts of interest The authors report no conflict of interest. Research involving human participants ethics approval This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical Integration and Practice Center at the Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University [SDULCLL2022-1–21]. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent Informed consent was obtained from the patients before surgery. Consent to publish Not applicable. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Li, Q., Xu, L., Lin, Y. et al. Serum Metabolites as Diagnostic Biomarkers in Patients with Endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 31, 3719–3728 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01536-5 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01536-5

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

chemicals 6
monounsaturated fatty acid arginine glutathione ornithine ornithine ornithine

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-07T06:12:11.729357+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-09-07T06:10:00.402898+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-05-18T04:57:49.680383+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-07T06:27:18.705824+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine