Pessimistic and optimistic cognitive biases in cockroaches

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,480 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Understanding the subjective experience of animals is key for how we manage them and for mapping the evolution of cognitive complexity. Emotional and affective are fundamental to these goals as their presence indicates the potential for subjective experiences and suffering. However, until recently the potential for affective states in invertebrates has been underappreciated, especially for positive affective states where research is limited to a single order. Here, we adapt cognitive bias tests to examine both negative (pessimistic) and positive (optimistic) bias in cockroaches (Blaptica dubia) in order to expand the taxonomic reach of affective state research and to provide a rare test for positive affective states in an invertebrate. We trained cockroaches to associate two different odours with either positive or negative reinforcement and then assessed their reactions to ambiguous stimuli (a range of mixtures of the trained odours). We found that cockroaches exposed to light were more pessimistic (negative affective state) than controls, while those exposed to the scent of opposite sex conspecifics were marginally more optimistic (positive affective state) than controls. We therefore demonstrate the potential for affective states in cockroaches and for positive affective states in invertebrates more widely, indicating a hereto unexpected level of cognitive complexity. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00