Opto-controlled C9orf72 poly-PR forms anisotropic condensates causative of TDP-43 pathology in the nucleus

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,771 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Proteinaceous inclusions formed by C9orf72 derived dipeptide-repeat (DPR) proteins are a histopathological hallmark in ~50% of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia (ALS/FTD) cases. However DPR aggregation/inclusion formation could not be efficiently recapitulated in cell models for four out of five DPRs. In this study, using optogenetics, we achieved chemical-free poly-PR condensation/aggregation in cultured cells, with spatial and temporal control. Strikingly, nuclear poly-PR condensates had anisotropic, hollow-centre appearance, resembling anisosomes formed by aberrant TDP-43 species, and their growth was limited by RNA. These condensates induced abnormal TDP-43 granulation in the nucleus without the activation of stress response. Cytoplasmic poly-PR aggregates that formed under prolonged light stimulation were more persistent than its nuclear condensates, selectively sequestered TDP-43 in a demixed state and surrounded spontaneous stress granules. Our data suggest that poly-PR anisotropic condensation in the nucleus, causative of nuclear TDP-43 dysfunction, may constitute an early pathological event in C9-ALS/FTD. Anisosome-type condensates may represent a more common cellular pathology in neurodegeneration than previously thought. Highlights - Optogenetics can be used to model C9orf72 DPR condensation in cultured cells. - Opto-PR forms hollow nuclear condensates, and RNA limits their growth by fusion. - Opto-PR condensation leads to stress-independent TDP-43 pathology in the nucleus. - Cytoplasmic poly-PR assemblies are persistent and selectively sequester TDP-43. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Provide full name of authors Amend title and abstract

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00