Comparison among different ovarian stimulation regimens for assisted procreation procedures in patients with endometriosis
article
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
The objective of our study was to establish the most adequate ovarian stimulation regimen for assisted procreation in endometriotic patients. It consisted of a retrospective analysis comparing the use of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) buserelin either for 3 months or for 3 weeks and continued with ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), and the use of clomiphene citrate in association with HMG for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer, gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) and zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT). A total of 145 patients with endometriosis in 174 cycles were divided into two groups according to the revised American Fertility Society staging of the disease (group A, stages 1 and 2; group B, stages 3 and 4). The use of GnRHa significantly increased the number of oocytes retrieved. GnRH analogues for 3 months gave the highest fertilization rate for groups A and B. The cleavage, pregnancy and delivery rates, although higher in the groups treated with analogues, did not reach statistical significance. A higher number of patients had an embryo transfer in the groups treated with GnRHa (P < 0.05). Treatment with GnRHa for either 3 months or for 3 weeks proved to be more efficient than clomiphene citrate-HMG for assisted procreation procedures in patients with endometriosis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T07:40:15.345102+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK