Identification of Halo Blight Disease on Oat in Idaho and Exploration of Resistant Sources in Oat, Barley and Wheat

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,664 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Pseudomonas coronafaciens pv. coronafaciens (Pcc), the causal agent of Bacterial Halo blight (BHB) on oat, has been infrequently reported in the United States, with historical records limited to the 1920s through the 1960s. In 2023, oat trial fields in Aberdeen, Idaho were severely infected with an unknown disease that formed necrotic lesions on leaves. Preliminary identification based on colony morphology suggested a pathogen belonging to the genus Pseudomonas. Subsequent whole-genome sequencing confirmed 99.6% average nucleotide identity (ANI) with Pseudomonas coronafaciens pv. coronafaciens (Pcc). This marks the first detection of Pcc in Idaho, and the first detailed description of the pathogen in the United States after over half a century. Host range and pathogenicity assessments on multiple cereal crops showed that Pcc was pathogenic on oat, barley, and corn. However, wheat, rye and triticale displayed chlorosis and early cell death in response to the pathogen. Evaluation of oat and barley genotypes revealed resistance in the two crop species to be rare with only 2.5, and 4.5% of oat and barley genotypes exhibiting some level of resistance. Notably, the four resistant and moderately resistant barley genotypes identified in this study: DH170472, Celebration, Legacy and Quest are the first to be reported as sources of resistance to BHB. Results of the present study provides a basis for further research toward a better understanding of disease epidemiology, the genetics of host-pathogen interaction and the management of BHB on oat, barley and corn. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00