PATTY corrects open chromatin bias for improved bulk and single-cell CUT&Tag profiling

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,028 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Precise profiling of epigenomes is essential for better understanding chromatin biology and gene regulation. Cleavage Under Targets & Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) is an efficient epigenomic profiling technique that can be performed on a low number of cells and at the single-cell level. With its growing adoption, CUT&Tag datasets spanning diverse biological systems are rapidly accumulating in the field. CUT&Tag assays use the hyperactive transposase Tn5 for DNA tagmentation. Tn5’s preference toward accessible chromatin alters CUT&Tag sequence read distributions in the genome and introduces open-chromatin bias that can confound downstream analysis, an issue more substantial in sparse single-cell data. We show that open-chromatin bias extensively exists in published CUT&Tag datasets, including those generated with recently optimized high-salt protocols. To address this challenge, we present PATTY (Propensity Analyzer for Tn5 Transposase Yielded bias), a comprehensive computational method that corrects open-chromatin bias in CUT&Tag data by leveraging accompanying ATAC-seq. By integrating transcriptomic and epigenomic data using machine learning and integrative modeling, we demonstrate that PATTY enables accurate and robust detection of occupancy sites for both active and repressive histone modifications, including H3K27ac, H3K27me3, and H3K9me3, with experimental validation. We further develop a single-cell CUT&Tag analysis framework built on PATTY and show improved cell clustering when using bias-corrected single-cell CUT&Tag data compared to using uncorrected data. Beyond CUT&Tag, PATTY sets a foundation for further development of bias correction methods for improving data analysis for all Tn5-based high-throughput assays. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Substantial revision has been made to expand the data analyses, clarify the conceptual foundations, approaches, and detailed results, and include more figures and supplementary figures.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00