The Gaslighting at Work Scale: Development and initial validation

The Gaslighting at Work Scale: Development and initial validation | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article The Gaslighting at Work Scale: Development and initial validation Aglaia Katsiroumpa, Ioannis Moisoglou, Olympia Konstantakopoulou, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5791246/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Introduction: Despite the growing literature on bullying, mobbing, harassment and abuse at work, the measurement of workplace gaslighting has received scarce attention. There is an absence of valid tools to measure workplace gaslighting. Given that workplace gaslighting is an alarming issue, there is a need for valid tools to measure this construct. Aim: To develop and validate a tool to measure workplace gaslighting. Methods: First, we performed a complete and thorough literature review to create a pool of items that could measure workplace gaslighting. Second, we employed an expert panel to assess the content validity of the initial set of our items. Third, we examined the face validity of our items by performing cognitive interviews with employees, and calculating the item-level face validity index. Fourth, we performed an item analysis for the items that were produced after the initial development phase of the Gaslighting at Work Scale (GWS). Fifth, we examined the construct validity of the GWS by performing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Sixth, we examined the concurrent validity of the GWS by using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), the Quiet Quitting Scale (QQS), the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3), and the Single Item Burnout (SIB) measure. Finally, we examined the reliability of the GWS by calculating Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s Omega, Cohen’s kappa, and intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: Initially, we developed a pool of 32 items and, after expert panel review and item analysis, we deleted 15 items. Then, we conducted exploratory factor analysis, and we removed six items. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the results from the exploratory factor analysis. Thus, we found that the final version of the GWS includes 11 items. Moreover, we identified two factors; loss of trust (five items), and abuse of power (six items). Concurrent validity of the GWS was excellent since we found statistically significant correlations between GWS, PHQ-4, QQS, UWES-3 and SIB. Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s Omega for the GWS was 0.939 and 0.940, respectively. Cohen’s kappa for the 11 items ranged from 0.840 to 0.914. Intraclass correlation coefficient for the GWS was 0.997. Therefore, the reliability of the GWS was excellent. Conclusions: The GWS is a two-factor 11-item scale with robust psychometric properties. The GWS is a short and easy-to-use tool that measures gaslighting behaviors of supervisors in a valid way. Valid identification of harmful supervisor behaviors is crucial to promote subordinates’ mental health and work productivity. Psychology Psychiatry Nursing Social Work Health Policy gaslighting work scale tool instrument validation development Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5791246","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":399577536,"identity":"48d8a9ba-2bd0-4b94-af03-066ff5a8692a","order_by":0,"name":"Aglaia Katsiroumpa","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Aglaia","middleName":"","lastName":"Katsiroumpa","suffix":""},{"id":399577537,"identity":"ffa30aac-b6bd-40e5-a29c-da98a19447f4","order_by":1,"name":"Ioannis Moisoglou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Thessaly","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ioannis","middleName":"","lastName":"Moisoglou","suffix":""},{"id":399577538,"identity":"560c8717-98b1-4e8d-a78c-0ababb201160","order_by":2,"name":"Olympia Konstantakopoulou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Olympia","middleName":"","lastName":"Konstantakopoulou","suffix":""},{"id":399577539,"identity":"8d22dae8-c119-44bd-8517-d680137ca3d8","order_by":3,"name":"Maria Tsiachri","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maria","middleName":"","lastName":"Tsiachri","suffix":""},{"id":399577540,"identity":"d3c493d3-e714-4a2c-8322-c877689f70ba","order_by":4,"name":"Antigoni Kolisiati","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Antigoni","middleName":"","lastName":"Kolisiati","suffix":""},{"id":399577541,"identity":"217c6ebd-1e15-4c98-a594-db913bcb352f","order_by":5,"name":"Petros Galanis","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1308-5782","institution":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Petros","middleName":"","lastName":"Galanis","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-01-08 18:13:11","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5791246/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5791246/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":73342588,"identity":"9c6a759c-73e0-493e-a5b3-73b3799f306a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-09 05:42:44","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":693778,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscriptGWSDevelopmentPREPRINT.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5791246/v1_covered_b4cdcc7b-1f15-4028-9c52-4576de6e6200.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe Gaslighting at Work Scale: Development and initial validation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"gaslighting, work, scale, tool, instrument, validation, development","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5791246/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5791246/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIntroduction:\u003c/strong\u003e Despite the growing literature on bullying, mobbing, harassment and abuse at work, the measurement of workplace gaslighting has received scarce attention. There is an absence of valid tools to measure workplace gaslighting. Given that workplace gaslighting is an alarming issue, there is a need for valid tools to measure this construct.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAim:\u003c/strong\u003e To develop and validate a tool to measure workplace gaslighting.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods:\u003c/strong\u003e First, we performed a complete and thorough literature review to create a pool of items that could measure workplace gaslighting. Second, we employed an expert panel to assess the content validity of the initial set of our items. Third, we examined the face validity of our items by performing cognitive interviews with employees, and calculating the item-level face validity index. Fourth, we performed an item analysis for the items that were produced after the initial development phase of the Gaslighting at Work Scale (GWS). Fifth, we examined the construct validity of the GWS by performing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Sixth, we examined the concurrent validity of the GWS by using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), the Quiet Quitting Scale (QQS), the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3), and the Single Item Burnout (SIB) measure. Finally, we examined the reliability of the GWS by calculating Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s Omega, Cohen’s kappa, and intraclass correlation coefficient.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults:\u003c/strong\u003e Initially, we developed a pool of 32 items and, after expert panel review and item analysis, we deleted 15 items. Then, we conducted exploratory factor analysis, and we removed six items. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the results from the exploratory factor analysis. Thus, we found that the final version of the GWS includes 11 items. Moreover, we identified two factors; loss of trust (five items), and abuse of power (six items). Concurrent validity of the GWS was excellent since we found statistically significant correlations between GWS, PHQ-4, QQS, UWES-3 and SIB. Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s Omega for the GWS was 0.939 and 0.940, respectively. Cohen’s kappa for the 11 items ranged from 0.840 to 0.914. Intraclass correlation coefficient for the GWS was 0.997. Therefore, the reliability of the GWS was excellent.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusions:\u003c/strong\u003e The GWS is a two-factor 11-item scale with robust psychometric properties. The GWS is a short and easy-to-use tool that measures gaslighting behaviors of supervisors in a valid way. Valid identification of harmful supervisor behaviors is crucial to promote subordinates’ mental health and work productivity.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The Gaslighting at Work Scale: Development and initial validation","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-01-09 05:34:37","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5791246/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"70d5482e-4a59-46b0-b3b2-0c2d0cbd3c8d","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 9th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":42578224,"name":"Psychology"},{"id":42578225,"name":"Psychiatry"},{"id":42578226,"name":"Nursing"},{"id":42578227,"name":"Social Work"},{"id":42578228,"name":"Health Policy"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-01-09T05:34:37+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-01-09 05:34:37","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5791246","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5791246","identity":"rs-5791246","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}