Evaluation of Obstetric Outcomes in Women with Endometriosis
This study found that women with endometriosis had higher rates of ART use, gestational hypertension, cesarean delivery, blood loss, and NICU admission, along with earlier gestational age at birth.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective study evaluated obstetric and neonatal outcomes in 1015 women who had pregnancy follow-up and delivered in a single hospital from 2018–2023, comparing groups based on whether they had a diagnosis of endometriosis. Across the endometriosis group, the authors found higher rates of assisted reproductive technology use, gestational age was lower, and gestational hypertension, cesarean delivery, higher estimated blood loss, and higher NICU admission rates were all significantly more frequent. The study’s main caveat is that outcomes are observational and the authors conclude that perinatal risks are multifactorial, calling for prospective, large population-based studies or meta-analyses to clarify risks. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it evaluates how endometriosis diagnosis is associated with obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,639 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Material and methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00