Abstract
Background: Lymphatic filariasis, caused predominantly by W. Bancrofti , remains a significant public
health concern in several parts of India, including Bihar. Although microfilariae are commonly found in
peripheral blood and lymphatic tissues, their detection in cervicovaginal cytology smears is extremely rare
and is usually an incidental finding during routine cervical cancer screening.
Case Presentation: A 50-year-old multiparous woman (P3L3) presented with abnormal uterine bleeding
(AUB-A). Ultrasonographic evaluation showed adenomyosis with hydrosalpinx .A Liquid-Based Cytology
(LBC) Pap smear revealed sheathed microfilariae and was reported as Negative for Intraepithelial lesion or
malignancy (NILM) with presence of organism consistent with morphological features of W. Bancrofti .
The patient subsequently underwent vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral adnexal remo val, and
histopathological examination revealed a right ovarian serous cystadenoma and bilateral hydrosalpinx. No
adult filarial worms were identified in the surgical specimen.
Conclusion
This case highlights the diagnostic value of meticulous cytological screening, particularly in
filariasis-endemic regions. The incidental detection of microfilariae in an otherwise NILM smear, along
with the coexistence of ovarian serous cystadenoma and bilateral hydrosalpinx, underscores the importance
of maintaining a hi gh index of suspicion for occult parasitic infections during routine cytological
evaluation.
Keywords
W. Bancrofti , Microfilaria, Liquid -Based Cytology, Pap smear, Serous cystadenoma,
Hydrosalpinx, Occult filariasis
Introduction
Lymphatic filariasis is a mosquito -borne parasitic disease that continues to pose a major public
health challenge in tropical and subtropical regions. Among the filarial parasites infecting
humans, W. ( Wuchereria) Bancrofti is responsible for nearly 90% of cases worldwide. India
contributes substantially to the global disease burden, with several states, including Bihar,
remaining endemic despite ongoing elimination programs [1]. In humans, adult worms reside
within lymphatic vessels, whereas microfilariae circulate in the peripheral blood,
characteristically exhibiting nocturnal periodicity [2].
Cervicovaginal cytology is routinely employed for the screening of premalignant and malignant
cervical lesions. In addition to epithelial abnormalities, a variety of infectious agents may
occasionally be identified in cervical smears [3]. However, the presence of microfilariae in
cervicovaginal cytology is exceptionally rare because the female genital tract is not a natural
habitat for the parasite. Consequently, most reported cases represent incidental findings detected
during routine cervical screening [4].
The exact mechanism responsible for the appearance of microfilariae in cervicovaginal smears
remains uncertain. Proposed explanations include lymphatic obstruction, rupture of superficial
lymphatic vessels, and inflammatory damage leading to the extravasation of microfilariae into
surrounding tissues [5]. Although filariasis has been described in association with both benign
and malignant gynecological conditions, its coexistence with adnexal lesions is uncommon and
remains a diagnostic curiosity.
A review of the literature reveals only a limited number of case reports and small case series
describing microfilariae in cervicovaginal smears. Herein, we report a rare case of incidental
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology https://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 2526 ~
detection of W. Bancrofti microfilariae in a Liquid -Based
Cytology (LBC) Pap smear from a patient presenting with
abnormal uterine bleeding. Histopathological examination
subsequently revealed a right ovarian serous cystadenoma and
bilateral hydrosalpinx, making this an unusual coexistence of
occult filarial infection with benign adnexal pathology.
Case Presentation
A 50 -year-old multiparous woman (P3L3) presented with
abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB -A). She had a history of three
full-term normal vaginal deliveries and had undergone bilateral
tubal ligation eight years earlier. On examination, the abdomen
was soft and non -tender with no palpable mass. Per speculum
examination revealed a hypertrophied cervix with erosions
around the external o s and whitish discharge, while per vaginal
examination showed a mildly bulky anteverted uterus with free
bilateral fornices.
Laboratory investigations revealed mild anemia (hemoglobin 9.8
g/dL) with eosinophilia. Peripheral blood smear showed
normocytic no rmochromic anemia and mild eosinophilia but
was negative for hemoparasites. Serological tests were non -
reactive. Ultrasonography suggested adenomyosis with bilateral
hydrosalpinx, more prominent on the left side.
A Liquid -Based Cytology (LBC) Pap smear was reported as
negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM).
However, careful microscopic examination revealed a sheathed
microfilaria exhibiting characteristic features of W. Bancrofti ,
including a slender body with smooth curves, a distinct she ath,
and a nuclei-free tail tip (Figure 1, 2a,2b))
The patient subsequently underwent vaginal hysterectomy with
bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Histopathological examination
(Figure 3a,3b) showed chronic cervicitis, secretory
endometrium, right ovarian serous cystadenoma, and bilateral
hydrosalpinx. (Figure 3) No evidence of atypia, malignancy,
adult filarial worms, or tissue infiltration by microfilariae was
identified.
Discussion
and Review of Literature
Lymphatic filariasis continues to be a significant public health
concern in many tropical and subtropical countries, including
India, where W. Bancrofti is responsible for the majority of
cases. Although microfilariae are commonly detected in
peripheral blood and lymphatic channels, their presence in
cervicovaginal cytology smears is extremely uncommon. (5)
Since the female genital tract is not a usual site of filarial
infestation, identification of microfilariae in Pap smears is
generally unexpected and often represents an incidental finding.
The occurrence of microfilariae in cervicovaginal smears was
first documented by Walter et al ., [6] following which only
sporadic case reports and small case series have appeared in the
literature. Most patients reported in these studies were clinically
asymptomatic for filariasis and presented with nonspecific
gynecological complaints such as vaginal discharge, abnormal
uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, or postmenopausal bleeding. In the
present case, the patient presented with abnormal uterine
bleeding and had no clinical features suggestive of lymphatic
filariasis, making the cytological finding particularly
unexpected.
A recent study by Kumar et al . [7] from Bihar described four
cases of incidental detection of W. Bancrofti in routine
cervicovaginal Pap smears. Similar to our patient, the majority
of these women had no clinical suspicion of filarial infection,
and the diagnosis was established solely through cytological
examination. Such reports (Table1) highlight the important role
of routine cervical cytology in identifying occult filariasis,
especially in endemic regions where the disease burden remains
high. Summary of previously reported cases of microfil ariae
detected in cervicovaginal cytology (Table 1)
Table 1: Summary of Previously Reported Cases of Microfilariae
Detected in Cervicovaginal Cytology
Author Year Presentation Cytology Type Associated Lesion
Walter et
al. (6) 1983 Vaginal bleeding Conventional
smear None
Dhanya et
al. (11) 2016 Vaginal discharge Pap smear None
Singla et
al. (4) 2020 Routine screening Pap smear None
Kumar et
al. (7) 2022 Asymptomatic
cases Pap smear None
Present
case 2026 Abnormal Uterine
Bleeding LBC
Serous cystadenoma
+ bilateral
hydrosalpinx
The mechanism by which microfilariae reach the cervicovaginal
region is not completely understood. Several theories have been
proposed, including lymphatic obstruction, rupture of lymphatic
vessels, inflammatory damage to vascular structures, and
increased vascular permeability, all of which may facilitate
migration of microfilariae into surrounding tissues and
exfoliated cellular material [5, 8]. In our patient, the presence of
chronic cervicitis and local inflammatory changes may have
contributed to the pa ssage of microfilariae into the
cervicovaginal smear.
The increasing use of Liquid -Based Cytology (LBC) has
improved the quality of cervical screening by providing cleaner
backgrounds and better cellular preservation [9]. Although the
processing technique may cause minor morphological alterations
in parasites, characteristic features of W. Bancrofti, including the
delicate sheath, smooth curves of the body, and nuclei -free tail
tip, are usually well preserved. These features enabled accurate
identification of the organism in our case despite the absence of
detectable microfilaremia in the peripheral blood smear [10, 11].
Such findings emphasize that a negative peripheral smear does
not exclude occult filarial infection.
An additional noteworthy feature of this case is its association
with a right ovarian serous cystadenoma and bilateral
hydrosalpinx. While microfilariae have occasionally been
reported in association with both benign and malignant lesions
of the female genital tract, coexistence with serous cysta denoma
and bilateral hydrosalpinx is exceptionally rare.
Histopathological examination of the surgical specimen did not
reveal adult worms or tissue infiltration by filarial organisms,
suggesting that the microfilariae represented an incidental occult
infection rather than a direct cause of the adnexal pathology.
The present case underscores the importance of careful and
systematic evaluation of all cytological smears, including those
reported as negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy
(NILM). In regions where filariasis is endemic, awareness of
such unusual presentations is essential, as incidental cytological
detection may provide the first clue to an otherwise clinically
silent infection. Early recognition facilitates timely treatment
and may he lp prevent the long -term complications associated
with chronic lymphatic filariasis.
Conclusion
Incidental detection of W. Bancrofti microfilariae in Liquid -
Based Cytology smears is an uncommon but important finding.
The coexistence of microfilariae with ovarian serous
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology https://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 2527 ~
cystadenoma and bilateral hydrosalpinx makes the present case
particularly noteworthy. This report highlights the valu e of
meticulous cytological examination in routine cervical screening
and reinforces the need for vigilance among cytopathologists
working in filariasis -endemic regions. Even in smears reported
as NILM, careful screening may reveal unexpected findings that
have significant diagnostic and clinical implications.
Fig 1: 40X, PAP Stain, Microfilariae-Sheathed organism, enlongated body with tapering tail
Fig 2a, b: 100X, PAP SMEAR, Microfilariae-body composed of a dense column of tightly packed nuclei.
Fig 3a, b: 40X, Right Ovary, HPE, Cyst lined by flattened to cuboidal epithelium-Serous Cystadenoma
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology https://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 2528 ~
Conflict of Interest
Not available
Financial Support
Not available
References
1. World Health Organization. Lymphatic filariasis. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2024. Available from:
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-
sheets/detail/lymphatic-filariasis. Accessed June 30, 2025.
2. Babu S, Nutman TB. Immunopathogenesis of lymphatic
filarial disease. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34(6):847 -861.
doi:10.1007/s00281-012-0346-4.
3. Ezzelarab S, El-Husseiny A, Nasreldin M, Ali R, Nabhan A;
Early Cervical Cancer Detection Consortium. Cervical
cancer screening by cytology and the burden of epithelial
abnormalities in low resource settings: a tertiary -center 42-
year study. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):405.
doi:10.1186/s12905-024-03254-1.
4. Singla S, Singla G, Singla T, Kolte S. Incidental finding of
microfilariae in cervicovaginal smears on liquid -based
cytology: a case report of two cases with review of
literature. J Midlife Health. 2020;11(1):37 -39.
doi:10.4103/jmh.JMH_17_19.
5. Varghese R, Raghuveer CV, Pai MR, Bansal R.
Microfilariae in cytologic smears: a report of six cases. Acta
Cytol. 1996;40:299-301. doi:10.1159/000333755.
6. Walter A, Krishnaswami H, Cariappa A. Microfilariae of
Wuchereria bancrofti in cytologic smears. Acta Cytol.
1983;27:432-436.
7. Kumar T, Ganesh RA, Surabhi, Sinha R, Bhadani PP.
Microfilaria in cervicovaginal Pap smears: a common
parasite hiding in an unusual site: short series of four cases
with literature review. Diagn Cytopathol. 2023;51(2):E54 -
E58. doi:10.1002/dc.25065.
8. Gupta D, Gupta P, Jain S, Rahar S. Cytological diagnosis of
microfilariae in clinically unsuspected cases: a retrospective
review of 12 cases. Cytopathology. 2021;32:807 -812.
doi:10.1111/cyt.13035.
9. Pangarkar MA. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical
cytology. Cytojournal. 2022;19:28.
doi:10.25259/CMAS_03_07_2021.
10. Jain S, Gupta P, Bhardwaj M. Incidental finding of
microfilaria in cervicovaginal liquid -based cytology smear.
J Cytol. 2020;37(1):65-66. doi:10.4103/JOC.JOC_81_19.
11. Dhanya CS, Jayaprakash HT. Microfilariae, a common
parasite in an unusual site: a case report with literature
review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(4):ED08 -ED09.
doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/16042.7563.
How to Cite This Article
Chawla S, Anu D, Mukherjee M, Roy AD. Incidental detection of
Wuchereria bancrofti in a Liquid -based cytology smear coexisting with
ovarian serous cystadenoma and bilateral hydrosalpinx : A rare case report.
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology .
2026;10(4):2525-2528.
Creative Commons (CC) License
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution -Non-Commercial-Share Alike 4.0
International (CC BY -NC-SA 4.0) License, which allows others to remix,
tweak, and build upon the work non -commercially, as long as appropriate
credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.