The FACIT-AI, a new tool for assessing symptoms associated with malignant ascites
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This paper introduces the FACIT-AI, a novel questionnaire designed to assess symptoms related to malignant ascites.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveThe objectives of this study are to assess the clinical relevance and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Ascites Index (FACIT-AI) in women with ovarian cancer and malignant ascites, and to modify the instrument guided by qualitative feedback from patients with recurrent malignant ascites.MethodsFourteen adult female patients with recurrent symptomatic malignant ascites were enrolled from three centers. All completed an open-ended symptom list to identify their primary concerns regarding their condition. They then completed a draft 10-item FACIT-AI questionnaire created from expert input. Eleven patients provided comments regarding the FACIT-AI questionnaire using a written feedback format. Three patients participated in a "think-aloud" cognitive debriefing interview to ensure patient comprehension of questionnaire items.ResultsOf the first 11 patients surveyed, 7 believed that the draft FACIT-AI contained all important symptoms associated with malignant ascites. Responses from the remaining 4 patients revealed three symptoms that 2 or more patients nominated for inclusion: urinary frequency, constipation and emotional distress. These items were added to the original FACIT-AI to produce a 13-item index of symptoms associated with malignant ascites.ConclusionsThe 13-item FACIT-AI has content validity among women with malignant ascites associated with ovarian cancer. It is available for use in clinical research or practice, with the expectation that more will be learned about its performance and interpretation over time.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (16)
- doi:10.1006/gyno.2001.6328 via openalex
- doi:10.1023/a:1016670403148 via openalex
- doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.974 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19950915)76:6<1096::aid-cncr2820760626>3.0.co;2-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(98)00037-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1006/gyno.1998.5215 via openalex
- doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1809 via openalex
- W6671798458 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm199402033300508 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0090-8258(92)90084-v via openalex
- doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.05.014 via openalex
- doi:10.1006/gyno.2002.6800 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0169-5002(95)00450-f via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00369-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.01.035 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:02:20.344922+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-16T06:22:10.609676+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK