Timing of intrauterine insemination: an attempt to unravel the enigma

Introduction Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with intrauterine insemination (IUI) is an effective treatment in cases of cervical factor, unexplained infertility and mild male factor. The optimal timing of IUI after human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) after COS with clomiphene citrate is debatable and may be a factor limiting success of same. This study was designed to scientifically determine if variation in the timing of IUI could affect the cycle outcome.

In a prospective randomized trial couples with mild male factor, unexplained infertility and mild endometriosis who underwent COS with IUI were recruited. COS was achieved with clomiphene citrate. Two hundred and four women underwent 461 cycles of IUI. Women were randomized to two groups: group I (104 patients, 231 cycles) had IUI 36 h after hCG, while group II (100 patients, 230 cycles) had IUI 24 h after hCG. Primary outcome included pregnancy rate per couple and per cycle.

Fifty-four patients had pregnancy with and pregnancy rate per couple and per cycle were 32.6 and 14.7% in group I and 20 and 8.6% in group II, respectively (not statistically different).

Altering timing of IUI after COS does not enhance pregnancy rates. IUI 36 h after hCG has marginally better pregnancy rates than 24 h. Timing of insemination may be kept at 24 or 36 h after hCG injection to suit the convenience of the clinic or care provider. The lack of statistical significance indicates need for larger studies to draw guidelines. Similar content being viewed by others

Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Rutten FF, Schoemaker J (2000) Intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 355(9197):13–18 Cohlen BJ, te Velde ER, van Kooij RJ (1995) Is there still a place for intra-uterine insemination as a treatment for male subfertility? A review. Int J Androl 18(Suppl 2):72–75 (review) Ragni G, Somigliana E, Vegetti W (2004) Timing of intrauterine insemination: where are we? Fertil Steril 82(1):25–26 (discussion 32–35; review) Campana A, Sakkas D, Stalberg A, Bianchi PG et al (1996) Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman’s age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis. Hum Reprod 11:732–736 Duran HE, Morshedi M, Kruger T, Oehninger S (2002) Intrauterine insemination, a systematic review on determinants of success. Hum Reprod Update 8(4):373–384 Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K, Laursen SB, Rex S, Westergaard LG (2001) Homologous intrauterine insemination: an evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:74–81 Demir B, Dilbaz B, Cinar O, Karadag B, Tasci Y, Kocak M, Dilbaz S, Goktolga U (2011) Factors affecting pregnancy outcome of intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with favourable female characteristics. J Obstet Gynaecol 31(5):420–423 Ozçakir HT, Göker EN, Terek MC, Adakan S, Ulukus M, Levi R, Tavmergen E (2002) Relationship of follicle number, serum estradiol level, and other factors to clinical pregnancy rate in gonadotropin-induced intrauterine insemination cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet 266(1):18–20 Dodson WC, Haney AF (1991) Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 55:457–467 Robb PA, Robins JC, Thomas MA (2004) Timing of hCG administration does not affect pregnancy rates in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination using clomiphene citrate. J Natl Med Assoc 96(11):1431–1433 World Health Organization (2001) Laboratory manual of the World Health Organization for the examination of human semen and sperm–cervical mucus interaction. Ann Ist Super Sanita (I–XII):1–123 Parikh FR, Nandkarni SG, Kamat SG, Naik N, Soonawala SB, Parikh RM (1997) Genital tuberculosis: a major pelvic factor causing infertility in Indian women. Fertil Steril 67:497–500 Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group (2004) Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 81:19–25 Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A, Duleba AJ (1998) Comparison of intrauterine insemination with timed intercourse in superovulated cycles with gonadotropins: a metanalysis. Fertil Steril 69:486–491 Karande VC, Korn A, Morris R, Rao R, Balin M, Rinehart J (1999) Prospective randomized trial comparing the outcome and cost of in vitro fertilization with that of a traditional treatment algorithm as first-line therapy for couples with infertility. Fertil Steril 71(3):468–475 Templeton AA, van Look P, Angell RE, Aitken RJ, Lumsden MA, Baird DT (1986) Oocyte recovery and fertilization rates in women at various times after the administration of hCG. J Reprod Fertil 76(2):771–778 Awonuga A, Govindbhai J (1999) Is waiting for an endogenous luteinizing hormone surge and/or administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin of benefit in intrauterine insemination? Hum Reprod 14(7):1765–1770 Wang YC, Chang YC, Chen IC, Cnien HH, Wu GJ (2006) Comparison of timing of IUI in ovarian stimulated cycles. Arch Androl 52(5):371–374 Pryor JL, Kuneck P, Blatz SM et al (2001) Delayed timing of intrauterine insemination results in a significantly improved pregnancy rate in female partners of quadriplegic men. Fertil Steril 76:1130–1135 Sunde A, Kahn JA, Molne K (1988) Intrauterine insemination: a European collaborative report. Hum Reprod 2:69–73 Edwards RG, Steptoe PC (1974) Control of human ovulation, fertilization and implantation. Proc R Soc Med 67:932–9359 Kucuk T (2008) Intrauterine insemination: is the timing correct? J Assist Reprod Genet 25(8):427–430 (Epub 2 Sep 2008) Peterson CM, Hatasaka HH, Jones KP et al (1994) Ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination compared with in vitro fertilization and no therapy: a prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 62:535–544 Brzechffa PR, Daneshmand S, Buyalos RP (1998) Sequential clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin with intrauterine insemination: the effect of patient age on clinical outcome. Hum Reprod 13:2110–2114 Tomilson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA, Kasraie JL, Bentick B (1996) Prognostic indicators for IUI: statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod 11(9):1892–1896 Rahman SM, Malhotra N, Kumar S, Roy KK, Agarwal A (2010) A randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of single versus double intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 94(7):2913–2915 (Epub 1 Aug 2010) Chavkin D, Molinaro T, Roe A, Sammel M, Dokras A (2011) Donor sperm insemination cycles: are two inseminations better than one? J Androl (Epub ahead of print) Acknowledgments We thank the institute ethics committee for clearing this randomized control trial. Conflict of interest None. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Rahman, S.M., Karmakar, D., Malhotra, N. et al. Timing of intrauterine insemination: an attempt to unravel the enigma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 1023–1027 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1950-6 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1950-6