iNaturalist como plataforma para documentar la funga chilena
This study analyzes iNaturalist's impact on documenting Chilean fungi, revealing its strengths in citizen science for biodiversity monitoring and its limitations due to geographic and user biases.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper studies how iNaturalist has influenced the recording and documentation of fungi in Chile between 2008 and 2024, using community-driven observation data summarized by geography, taxonomy, and user behavior. It reports more than 63,000 observations across 1,245 species, concentrated in central and southern regions and mainly in urban areas, with a small group of highly prolific users contributing 44.40% of records, alongside an increase in observations since 2020 that may reflect growing interest in mycology. The authors emphasize that while iNaturalist can expand taxonomic, spatial, and temporal coverage beyond traditional logistical limits, the data are subject to biases and they note structural challenges in Chilean mycology such as limited funding and training. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,986 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Keywords
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00