Short-term Lupron or danazol therapy for pelvic endometriosis
rct
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
A 3-month course of either leuprolide acetate or danazol significantly reduced endometriosis scores, including adhesions and endometriomata size, in patients with laparoscopically proven endometriosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a 3-month trial of leuprolide acetate (LA; Lupron; TAP Pharmaceuticals, Deerfield, IL) versus danazol (Danocrine; Scenofi Winthrup Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY) therapy on laparoscopically proven endometriosis.
DESIGN: Endometriosis severity was assessed at the time of laparoscopy and patients were randomized to receive 0.1 mg SC LA (n = 22) or 800 mg danazol orally (n = 18) daily for 3 months. A second laparoscopy and/or laparotomy was performed to assess the change in the extent of endometriosis and for surgical therapy.
SETTING: Private practice at a university-affiliated hospital.
PATIENTS: Forty patients with mild, moderate, or severe endometriosis. Ten patients were excluded.
INTERVENTION: Three-month treatment randomly assigned to either LA or danazol.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prospective measurement of American Fertility Society endometriosis scores and size of ovarian endometriomata before and after therapy via laparoscopy.
RESULTS: The mean endometriosis score including adhesions decreased significantly from 36 +/- 4.9 to 29 +/- 5.0 (mean +/- SEM) with LA and from 34 +/- 6.4 to 29 +/- 6.5 with danazol. The mean laparoscopic endometriosis score not including adhesions decreased from 27 +/- 3.5 to 22 +/- 3.4 with LA and 22 +/- 3.5 to 19 +/- 3.1 with danazol. Seven of 18 (39%) endometriomata responded to LA and 6 of 15 (40%) endometriomata responded to danazol.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that both danazol and LA will reduce endometriosis scores after a 3-month course of therapy. Larger clinical trials are needed to compare short courses of therapy with the more established 6-month trials. A 3-month versus a 6-month course of therapy offers obvious benefits including decreased cost and decreased side effects.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-17T06:13:18.893374+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:18.900538+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-16T02:00:00.672124+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine