Ecological stoichiometry and life history theory, not the identity of genomic variants, predict rapid adaptation

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 73,877 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Ecological stoichiometry and life history theory, not the identity of genomic variants, predict rapid adaptation | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Ecological stoichiometry and life history theory, not the identity of genomic variants, predict rapid adaptation View ORCID Profile Seth M. Rudman , View ORCID Profile Joshua J. Faber-Hammond , Ryan E. Sherman , View ORCID Profile René S. Shahmohamadloo , View ORCID Profile Sharon I. Greenblum , View ORCID Profile Heath A. MacMillan , View ORCID Profile Punidan D. Jeyasingh , View ORCID Profile Paul S. Schmidt doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.11.687836 Seth M. Rudman 1 School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University , Vancouver, WA, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Seth M. Rudman For correspondence: seth.rudman{at}wsu.edu Joshua J. Faber-Hammond 1 School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University , Vancouver, WA, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Joshua J. Faber-Hammond Ryan E. Sherman 2 Department of Biology, Oklahoma State University , Stillwater, OK, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site René S. Shahmohamadloo 1 School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University , Vancouver, WA, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for René S. Shahmohamadloo Sharon I. Greenblum 3 Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory , Berkeley, CA, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Sharon I. Greenblum Heath A. MacMillan 4 Department of Biology and Institute of Biochemistry, Carleton University , Ottawa, ON, Canada Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Heath A. MacMillan Punidan D. Jeyasingh 2 Department of Biology, Oklahoma State University , Stillwater, OK, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Punidan D. Jeyasingh Paul S. Schmidt 5 Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Paul S. Schmidt Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Significance Forecasting how populations adapt to changing environments is a central challenge in evolutionary biology. We tested the predictability of rapid adaptation by tracking both phenotypic and genomic trajectories of evolution in replicate outdoor populations of Drosophila melanogaster and comparing these data to predictions derived from life history theory, ecological stoichiometry, and genomic data. We found that life history theory and ecological stoichiometry forecasted the direction of phenotypic evolution, even with temporal changes in the direction of evolution. In contrast, genomic predictors were largely unable to forecast the SNPs or genes underlying adaptation. These results demonstrate the utility of ecological frameworks to provide general, but robust, forecasts of adaptation in complex environments. Determining the scale and scope of the predictability of evolution is fundamental to understanding biological processes and to managing biodiversity. Ecological frameworks, including life history theory and ecological stoichiometry, offer testable predictions about the direction of adaptation and trade-offs between traits in response to environmental change. Similarly, well-characterized molecular pathways, genotype–phenotype linkages, and prior evolutionary genomic studies could be predictive of the genomic architecture underlying adaptation. We tested whether ecological frameworks and evolutionary genomic data can be used to forecast rapid adaptation in replicated outdoor populations of Drosophila melanogaster evolving in response to natural seasonal fluctuations from summer to late fall. Life history theory predicted the observed pattern of adaptive tracking: in summer, reproductive output increased and stress tolerance decreased, while in fall, this direction reversed, with evolution of increased stress tolerance at the expense of reproduction. Stoichiometric phenotypic evolution was also predictable, with phosphorus and magnesium content, both linked to growth rate, and alkali metal, associated with maintaining homeostasis in response to thermal stress, showing rapid and parallel evolution indicative of adaptation. Temporal genomic data revealed a complex genomic architecture of temporal adaptation and the SNPs and genes involved in adaptation were largely unpredictable. These results demonstrate that ecological frameworks, more than genomic data, have utility in forecasting adaptation in complex and variable environments. Introduction Understanding how adaptation proceeds via natural selection is a fundamental goal of evolutionary biology ( 1 ). Whether it is possible to translate understanding of adaptation to prediction—defined as the ability to forecast changes in trait values or allele frequencies from existing information ( 2 )—has long been debated ( 3 , 4 ). Predicting evolution is critical for managing biodiversity ( 5 – 7 ) and for many aspects of human health and well-being ( 8 – 10 ). Accelerating anthropogenic change, including faster cycling of biogeochemicals ( 11 ), threatens to disrupt historical patterns of adaptation and exacerbate phenotype–environment mismatches ( 12 ). This heightens the need to translate knowledge of evolution to predicting the direction and pace of adaptive evolution in natural populations ( 2 , 13 , 14 ). Underlying complexity or contingency could render accurate evolutionary predictions either intractable or impossible ( 15 – 17 ). Genetic drift is well recognized as a process that produces unpredictable evolutionary outcomes (Lande 1975), particularly at modest effective population sizes. Beyond drift, genetic factors including possible constraints ( 18 , 19 ) or a potential lack of additive genetic variation on which selection could act ( 20 ) could likewise reduce predictability. Uncertainty and variability in the ecological factors that drive natural selection may be an even greater source of contingency ( 21 ). Despite the many reasons evolution may be unpredictable, there are notable cases of rapid and repeated adaptation, many of which occurred in response to experimentally manipulated agents that are chosen to drive strong directional selection ( 22 – 25 ). Tests of the predictability of rapid evolution in response to natural environmental variation are still comparatively rare and few studies have tested the ability to forecast evolution with empirical data ( 2 ). Determining whether existing information, including theory, prior experiments, and environmental data, allows for the identification of both the characters that will respond to selection and the direction of evolutionary trajectories is critical to resolving the extent to which rapid adaptation may be predictable and whether any predictions can be used for applications ( 4 , 26 , 27 ). Ecological theories could be extended to generate predictions regarding the direction of rapid phenotypic evolution in response to environmental change ( 28 ). Life history theory, which focuses on growth, reproduction, and somatic maintenance, has been successful in describing patterns of evolution across space in response to directional selection, including relative investment in reproductive output and stress tolerance ( 29 , 30 ). Ecological stoichiometry, which considers the balance of energy and materials in ecological interactions and processes ( 31 ), has proved tracking flows of elements between organisms and environments can be predictive of ecological outcomes. Specifically, the growth rate hypothesis posits C-to-P and N-to-P ratios are central limitations to organismal growth rates due, in part, to the high content of P in RNA required for rapid growth ( 32 , 33 ). Recent work has moved beyond C, N, and P to include the importance of other elements in growth (e.g., Mg ( 34 , 35 )) and identifying elemental limitations for specific taxa that can be predictive of their physiology and demography ( 36 – 38 ). This includes elemental contents that are critical to core aspects of life history, including ectotherm responses to thermal stress, where metals are central to maintaining ionic homeostasis ( 39 ). Whether elemental contents or the biogeochemical niche more broadly ( 40 ) can evolve rapidly in response to natural selection, outside of scenarios of elemental limitation, is largely unknown ( 41 – 43 ) and predictions from ecological stoichiometry have not been used to forecast evolution ( 38 ). Together, life history theory and ecological stoichiometry provide testable predictions for the phenotypes, and their directions of change, involved in rapid adaptation. Predicting evolution at the molecular level is also a major goal in biology ( 15 , 23 ) and patterns of repeated selection on the same genetic variants illustrate that the genomic architecture of adaptation could be predictable, likely due to underlying constraint or canalization ( 44 – 46 ). Repeated patterns of genetic change have given rise to the hypothesis that the presence of large-effect variants in specific genes ( 46 , 47 ) or particular SNPs are important for the pace of rapid adaptation and, ultimately, the persistence of populations ( 13 ). An improved understanding of whether and how the genetic basis of rapid adaptation is predictable is critical to a range of applications that seek to manage rapid adaptation, from conservation biology to resistance management ( 48 ). The polygenicity of many complex traits ( 49 ), genetic linkage ( 23 , 50 ), genotype-by-environment interactions ( 51 ), epistatic interactions ( 52 ), pleiotropy ( 53 ), and genetic redundancy ( 54 , 55 ) may ultimately limit the ability to forecast the genomic variants that underlie adaptation. Determining overall predictability is critical to understanding the applications of evolutionary genomic data for populations, but few such tests have been done and existing work largely has focused on the evolution of Mendelian traits ( 22 , 45 , 56 , 57 ). Predictions about the genomic architecture of adaptation at the locus or gene level could be made using prior studies or field patterns identifying the genetic architecture of adaptation to similar stressors, genotype–phenotype relationships ascertained through genetic mapping of traits demonstrated to be under selection, or from knowledge of the molecular pathways that shape phenotypes shown to be under selection. All of these sources of genomic information are available to various degrees in model taxa and, when paired with an ‘evolve-and-resequence’ experiment tracking genomic evolution, could be used to test the predictability of the genomic architecture of adaptation ( 58 , 59 ). To test the predictability of phenotypic and genomic adaptation, we conducted a replicated outdoor experiment that tracked evolution of eight Drosophila melanogaster populations from summer to late fall. We used life history theory and ecological stoichiometry to predict the directions and trade-offs of phenotypic evolution across temporally changing environmental conditions. Specifically, we tested for rapid evolution and temporal trade-offs in life history traits including reproductive output, which we predicted would show evolved increases in summer and subsequent evolved declines in fall. Conversely, we predicted that stress tolerance traits would exhibit tradeoffs with reproductive output and would be most critical in response to seasonally cooling temperatures ( 60 – 62 ), and hence would exhibit declines in summer and evolved increases in fall. We used the framework of ecological stoichiometry to make and test predictions that C:P and N:P ratios would initially decrease, with selection for faster growth and reproduction, than subsequently increase during fall as selection would act to increase somatic maintenance at a cost of reducing growth rates ( 43 ). We predicted Alkali metal content (K and Na), which is central to responses to prolonged cold exposure ( 63 , 64 ), would exhibit increased rates of temporal evolution particularly during periods of seasonal cooling to prevent loss of ionic homeostasis ( 65 ). Finally, we used knowledge of molecular pathways controlling ion transport in insects, genotype–phenotype linkages from association studies, and data from prior field evolution experiments to determine whether the genomic architecture of adaptation is predictable. We tested these predictions by assessing parallel evolutionary change indicative of adaptation ( 66 ) across eight replicate populations in key life history traits focused on: reproductive output and stress tolerance, stoichiometric basis of growth and thermal tolerance, and temporal whole genome sequencing of pools of individuals from each population ( Figure 1 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. A schematic showing the design and predictions. Tracking temporal evolution of replicate experimental field populations of Drosophila melanogaster to test whether adaptation was predictable using: (i) life-history theory (e.g., traits related to reproductive output and stress tolerance), (ii) ecological stoichiometry (i.e., growth rate hypothesis), (iii) major electrolytes (e.g., Na, Mg), and (iv) the evolutionary genomic predictors (i.e., genomic data demonstrating allele frequencies changes in prior field evolution experiments, genotype–phenotype linkages from association studies, and molecular pathways known to influence ion transport). Lines and points shown were created based on predictions derived from theory and projected abiotic change across seasons. Results Evidence that life history theory predicts rapid adaptation Temporal common garden rearing revealed parallel phenotypic evolution across independent populations over time, with changes in the direction of evolution indicative of adaptive tracking ( Figure 2 ). Moreover, life history theory, combined with seasonality (Figure S1), largely predicted the direction of evolution in traits related to reproductive output and stress tolerance: selection toward higher output and reduced stress tolerance in summer and lower output and increased stress tolerance in fall. Summer selection between July and August reduced starvation tolerance by >40%, but this was followed by a near doubling of starvation tolerance from September to November ( Figure 2A ; Chisq = 252.29, p < 0.0001). Heat tolerance showed a similar overall evolutionary trajectory, including declines during the hottest months, suggesting the assay may more strongly reflect overall stress tolerance than high heat performance (50% decrease from July to September; subsequent 37% increase from September to November ( Figure 2B ; Chisq = 83.98, p < 0.0001)). All reproductive output traits exhibited patterns opposite to those of stress tolerance traits, with evolved increases in summer and declines in fall. For example, early life fecundity showed an evolved 63% increase from July to October and a 77% decrease from October to November ( Figure 2C ; Chisq = 92.50, p < 0.0001). Similarly, larval development rate evolution showed a 21% increase in rate from July to September and a subsequent 66% slowing from October to November ( Figure 2D ; Chisq = 1323.4, p < 0.0001). Body mass likewise showed evidence of adaptive tracking with a 27% increase in average mass from July to September and a 99% decrease from October to November ( Figure 2E ; Chisq = 246.2, p < 0.0001), fitting with predictions based on the relationship between temperature and fitness ( 67 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Life history trait evolution over time. All phenotypes were measured after two generations of common garden rearing and hence represent phenotypic evolution. Parallel change over time is evidence of adaptation by natural selection. Panels A (starvation tolerance) and B (heat knockdown) show evolution of a reduction in stress resistance in summer followed by strong evolved increases. Panels C (fecundity), D (development rate), and E (dry mass of pools of five females) show evolution of traits related to reproductive output which show an opposite pattern (evolution of increased output in summer and decline in fall). Gray lines represent individual replicate populations and black points (±SE) and lines represent mean values. Evidence that stoichiometry predicts rapid adaptation The elemental constituents of Drosophila ( i.e., the ionome ( 42 )) also showed evidence of rapid adaptation with temporal changes in the direction of evolution indicative of adaptive tracking. C:P ratio evolved rapidly ( Figure 3A , Chisq = 67.73, p < 0.0001) with an initial decrease of 14% from July to August and a subsequent monotonic increase of 99% from August to November, qualitatively fitting with predictions from the growth rate hypothesis. N:P ratio also showed evidence of rapid seasonal adaptation evolution in N:P content across seasons ( Figure 3B , Chisq = 53.29, p < 0.0001). This included an evolved 54% increase from August to October. Magnesium content, a critical element for stabilizing many ATP dependent processes ( 35 , 68 ), including growth, also evolved rapidly paralleling patterns observed for P content ( Figure 3D , Chisq = 66.84, p < 0.0001), with a 24% evolved decrease from October to November. The direction of stoichiometric adaptation, particularly during the fall, fits with predictions for populations with reduced rates of growth and reproduction. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Stoichiometric trait evolution over time. Panels A and B show evolutionary trajectories of elemental ratios key to the growth rate hypothesis: A) The effect of seasonal evolution on C:P ratio; B) The effect of seasonal evolution on N:P ratio. Panel C shows evolution of Mg content, another key element related to growth. Panel D shows patterns of temporal evolution in K, an alkali metal associated with the maintenance of ion homeostasis in cold temperatures in ectotherms. In panels A-D gray lines represent individual replicate populations and black points (±SE) and lines represent mean values. Panel E is a PCA plot showing temporal evolution of replicate populations in 11 biologically active elements (PC1 most strongly influenced by Mg, S, N, K, and P). Panel E shows a comparison of rates of evolution, measured in Haldanes, between prior studies (meta-analysis across tax ( 71 ), a prior experiment measuring seasonal evolution of fitness associated phenotypes ( 57 ), and the rates of adaptation in life history and stoichiometric traits measured in this study. All phenotypes were measured after two generations of common garden rearing and hence are genetic changes in trait values. Alkali metal content, crucial for maintaining homeostasis in cold temperatures, exhibited patterns of rapid adaptation. We observed significant and predictable temporal adaptation in K ( Figure 3C , Chisq = 96.94, p < 0.0001), which included a 24% evolved drop in K content from August to November. Na content largely showed an opposite seasonal pattern with increases during the mid-summer (Supplementary Information, Figure S2, Chisq = 18.48, p = 0.001). Overall, we found parallel and rapid evolution of the biogeochemical niche, as principal components based on all elemental data separated populations by time. PC1, which captured 51.3% of the total variation in elemental content, illustrates a clear pattern of temporal ionome adaptation across seasonal time ( Figure 3E , Chisq = 21.35, p = 0.0003). This parallelism was not observed in the founder populations held indoors during the experiment (Figure S3), reinforcing adaptive tracking as the mechanism driving stoichiometric evolution. Beyond patterns already noted, elements including Fe, S, and Zn showed pronounced patterns of parallel temporal evolution (Supplementary Information, Figure S2), with seasonal declines that coincide with reduced reproduction and shifts in metabolic allocation, fitting with previously described associations ( 69 , 70 ). Overall, the pace of stoichiometric evolution, measured in haldanes, was comparable to what we observed in life history traits ( Figure 4F ) and rates of evolution in both classes of phenotypes far exceeded average rates of trait change measured over contemporary timescales ( 71 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Evidence for adaptation genome wide and at candidate loci. Manhattan plots highlighting SNPs which showed parallel changes in allele frequencies over time with each panel illustrating genomic outliers over a given time interval. Dotted lines from top to bottom correspond to FDR threshold values of 0.05, 0.1, and 0.25, and SNPs with FDR < 0.05 are additionally bolded in black. Sites within candidate genes are colored according to their predictive category (seasonal = prior evolution experiment ( 57 ), fecundity and starvation = genotype–phenotypes linkages ( 73 ), ion transport = candidate genes based on molecular functions (Table S4)). The predictability of the genomic architecture of adaptation Patterns of temporal genomic adaptation, genomic architecture, and gene ontology In total 13,684 SNPs showed significant parallel allele frequency shifts across replicate populations using an unadjusted- p < 0.01 (23 SNPs significant at FDR < 0.05). These putatively adaptive sites were dispersed across chromosomes, with an overabundance on 3R (∼30% of all putatively adaptive sites on 3R which contains ∼23% of total SNPs (Hypergeometric overlap p = 1.96E-85)). Known inversions were not enriched for temporal outliers overall, with only In(3R)Mo showing any signature of enrichment (Hypergeometric overlap p = 2.90E-3; 5/4173 SNPs on 3R). No significant SNPs at the unadjusted- p threshold fell within any other inversions. The potential functions of putatively adaptive sites, as determined through gene ontology enrichment analysis, showed enrichment for largely the same GO terms across all time-point contrasts, suggesting a subset of gene functional categories consistently involved in adaptive tracking (Supplementary Information, Table S1). Tests for predictability of the genomic architecture of adaptation We used the putatively adaptive loci identified here to test a priori hypotheses about the predictability of the genomic architecture of adaptation. Prior experimental work identifying the genomic architecture of seasonal adaptation ( 57 ) was not predictive of the adaptive sites we identified here in any of the three experimental time intervals at the SNP or gene level across either significance threshold (Supplementary Information, Tables S2 & S3; Figure 4 ). Tests for overlap with a larger set of seasonally adaptive SNPs from a multi-year experimental dataset ( 72 ) with even greater temporal resolution similarly revealed no hypergeometric enrichment among the top outlier SNP sets significant at the FDR<0.05 level. Genotype–phenotype relationships as identified by GWAS for starvation tolerance and fecundity ( 73 ), both of which evolved rapidly in this study ( Figure 2 ), were similarly unable to predict the architecture of adaptation in any contrast at either significance level (Supplementary Information, Tables S2 & S3; Figure 4 ). Finally, candidate genes known to impact ion-transport (Table S4) did not lend significant predictability for adaptive sites. From a list of 110 candidate gene regions with hypothesized links to ion regulation containing 28,896 SNPs, 62 genes contained 201 SNPs with signatures of selection prior to p-value correction and 1 SNP in the candidate gene Dh44-R1 , a diuretic hormone receptor with known importance for ion and water balance ( 74 ), remained significant after correction (Supplementary Information, Table S2 & S3; Figure 4 ). To determine whether overall sets of candidate loci yielded any predictability of the architecture of adaptation we employed Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests to compare overlap between sets of candidate SNPs and both putatively adaptive sites and randomly selected matched sets of loci. When compared to random sets, variants within candidate genes did show some increased overlap with adaptive sites. Most notably, SNPs within ion-transport candidate genes had greater overlap with adaptive sites than random sets for allele frequency change from October to November ( p = 0.02). Sites from the prior seasonal evolution experiment and loci associated with variation in starvation tolerance showed increased overlap relative to random sets for specific seasonal intervals (Sep-Oct ( p = 7.1E-04) and Sept-Nov ( p = 1.0E-02), respectively). In all three cases of enrichment, the average magnitude of allele frequency change in candidate genes was higher than the average allele frequency change observed in the null matched sets. However, the SNPs driving these patterns in seasonal- and starvation-associated genes largely differ from the candidate SNPs themselves and we observed no significant predictability at theSNP level for any set of predictors (Supplementary Information, Tables S5 & S6). Discussion The potential applications for evolutionary forecasts are clear; rapid adaptation has major influences on human health, ecosystem services, and the conservation of biodiversity ( 9 , 13 , 75 , 76 ). Patterns of repeated evolution demonstrate that evolutionary outcomes can be shaped by the deterministic force of natural selection ( 77 ). This includes work detailing rapid and repeated adaptation of Drosophila populations in field studies ( 62 , 78 , 79 ), laboratory experiments ( 54 , 80 ), and field experiments ( 57 , 72 , 81 , 82 ). We likewise found repeatability in evolutionary trajectories across replicate populations, beyond what is often seen when tracking evolution in field eukaryotic populations ( 77 , 83 ). This included patterns of temporal variation in the direction of adaptation indicative of adaptive tracking, inverse evolutionary trajectories of life history traits related to reproductive output and stress tolerance suggestive of temporal trade-offs, and adaptation in stoichiometric phenotypes not previously known to evolve rapidly in response to natural environmental variation ( 43 , 57 , 62 ). There is little in the biology of Drosophila or the specifics of this experiment, in which natural seasonal variation and associated ecological changes are the primary agents of selection, to indicate the evolutionary trajectories we observed should be exceptional amongst the genetically diverse multivoltine taxa that are central to many ecological communities ( 84 , 85 ). Here we translate these hallmarks of evolutionary determinism produced by natural selection to test predictions about adaptation derived from ecological frameworks, evolutionary genomics, and genotype–phenotype linkages. The direction of phenotypic evolution largely fits with predictions derived from the ecological frameworks of life history theory and ecological stoichiometry. Both frameworks can be combined with information on environmental change to forecast directions of trait evolution and potential trade-offs ( 31 , 86 , 87 ). Determining the utility of these ecological frameworks for predicting evolution across taxa and timescales is important for ascertaining generality and potential applications of these predictors ( 88 ). Ultimately, integrating knowledge of the direction of evolution into ecological niche models and biodiversity forecasting is critical to increasing the accuracy of conservation projections and management ( 13 , 89 ). Prior experimental work using Drosophila has demonstrated both rapid phenotypic adaptation and that a considerable portion of the genome shows parallel allele frequency changes across replicates due to the combination of genetic linkage and selection ( 57 , 72 , 90 ). While we detect parallel allele frequency change over time, the number of outlier loci and the size of haplotype blocks shaped by selection are considerably smaller than in prior experiments. Selection was strong with rates of phenotypic evolution meeting or exceeding those found in any previous field experiment ( Figure 3F ), likely due to greater genetic diversity. The most likely causes for the differences in genomic architecture relative to prior experiments are sampling protocol and the underlying genomic composition. We tracked changes in allele frequencies by sequencing a sub-sample of the full population of adults, differing from previous protocols that sequenced pools drawn only from reproducing individuals ( 57 , 72 , 90 ). The experiments differed also in genomic composition, here we used isofemale lines to form a genetically diverse founder population instead of outbreeding previously inbred lines, which have tremendously inflated genetic linkage beyond what is seen in natural Drosophila populations (e.g., correlation coefficients between alleles are often <0.1 within <500bp in nature ( 91 )). While selection was strong, it is likely the reduction in genetic linkage, and associated reduction in genetic draft (pseudohitchhiking ( 92 )) ( 57 , 72 ), led to a far lower proportion of the genome undergoing parallel allele frequency changes ( Figure 4 ). As a consequence, outlier loci identified in this study are much more likely to be the direct targets of selection. Continued investigations into the relationship between genetic linkage, the genomic architecture of adaptation ( 93 , 94 ), and predictability, including predictions made across genomic backgrounds, will substantially advance our understanding of epistatic constraint ( 95 ) and the mechanistic genetic basis of adaptation. In contrast to the overall predictability derived from the combination of environmental patterns and ecological frameworks the genomic architecture of adaptation was effectively unpredictable. This is a notable departure from prior investigations of the genomic architecture of adaptation in eukaryotes that assessed selection on specific large effect variants, which often do show elevated signatures of selection ( 22 , 45 , 47 , 56 , 96 ). The genetic architectures of the traits under selection in this experiment are polygenic ( 73 ), hence a large number of interactions could increase interference or epistatic effects ( 50 , 97 ), and selection both acted on multiple traits and varied temporally ( Figures 2 and 3 ). Temporal reversals of dominance could further reduce the strength of genotype–phenotype linkages and limit predictability ( 98 , 99 ). Moreover, the extent to which predictability is possible across populations or years, where genetic composition varies, is largely unknown ( 2 ). Together, these factors may render the genomic architecture of adaptation largely unpredictable in natural populations with polygenic fitness traits ( 49 , 100 , 101 ), even if there are common variants with moderate fitness effects ( 97 ). The unpredictability of the genomic architecture of complex trait evolution is emerging as a pattern across studies, including cases of Drosophila pigmentation ( 90 ) and mouse body size evolution ( 102 ). Yet, it is possible that increasing the quality of predictors, including conducting genotype–phenotype mapping in field environments, building extensive temporal datasets ( 96 ), or overall improvements in understanding the molecular mechanisms responsible for stress responses, may increase the predictability of the genomic basis of adaptation. Given the effort required to generate these data, the identification of specific genetic variants likely important for future adaptation may only be translatable to evolutionary applications when there are large effect loci that have been identified or verified in a field realistic context. In scenarios where fitness is composed of many traits, each with a polygenic basis, identification of causal loci or genetic variants important for future performance may be impractical ( 13 ). The limited, but significant, patterns of predictability we observed at the gene level do reinforce some potential utility of broad gene or pathway level knowledge for predicting adaptation ( 7 ). Overall the lack of genomic predictability, and the striking utility of ecological frameworks for evolutionary prediction, reinforces that trait-based, ecological, or quantitative genetic approaches to predicting rapid adaptation are likely more useful than a focus on putatively adaptive alleles. Translating evolutionary predictability into improved forecasting of demography and persistence in response to environmental change is critical to improving the management of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Methods Seasonal evolution experiment To begin the temporal evolution experiment we constructed an outbred founding population of Drosophila melanogaster by crossing 150 wild-collected isofemale lines that were collected from Pennsylvania in 2016 and 2017. These lines were not inbred and hence each likely retained substantial genetic diversity ( 103 ). 10 males and 10 females were taken from each line and combined into a large breeding cage. After three generations of mating and density controlled rearing in lab conditions (25°C; 16L/8D) we introduced 500 females and 500 males into each of eight outdoor experimental cages on June 15th, 2017. Outdoor cages are 2m × 2m × 2m enclosures constructed of fine mesh built around metal frames (see ( 104 ) for additional details). Inside of each enclosure we planted one peach tree and vegetative ground cover to provide shading and physically mimic the natural environment. Peaches were removed before ripening to prevent flies from feeding on them. Each of the eight populations were fed 300 mL of a standard Drosophila media three times a week (modified Bloomington recipe) from June 15th to November 12th, 2017. Measuring evolution in fitness associated phenotypes To track phenotypic evolution we collected 1,200 eggs from each experimental replicate at four intervals during the experiment (August 3rd, September 22nd, October 18th, and November 12th). These eggs were reared for two generations in laboratory common garden conditions (25°C; 16:8 light cycle; density controlled) to allow for the measurement of phenotypic evolution by removing any environmental variation. We assessed the extent of evolution in five fitness associated phenotypes related to reproductive output and stress resistance. Stress resistance phenotypes included starvation tolerance (time to starvation for each sex) and heat knockdown (time to knockdown at 55°C). Traits related to reproductive output: fecundity (number of eggs produced per female per day on days 3-6 post hatch), larval development time (1/time of development from egg to adult), and body mass (pools of 5 females). These focal phenotypes are commonly measured, related to organismal and population growth, and associated with major fitness life history trade offs (e.g., stress tolerance and reproductive output) ( 57 , 62 ). Following life history theory we predicted that the direction of phenotypic evolution would favor increased rates of development and reproductive output with potential trade-offs of reduced stress tolerance during summer conditions. We predicted the inverse in fall with selection driving increases in stress tolerance with a trade-off towards reduced reproductive output. We tested for adaptation as parallel change across replicate cages over time in each phenotype using linear mixed effects models with time point as a fixed effect and experimental cage as a random effect (‘lmer’ package). To assess significance we used a Wald chisq test (‘car’ package). Stoichiometric phenotypic evolution To test the predictability of rapid adaptation from stoichiometric principles we generated multi-element (‘ionomic’) data from five experimental populations at each of the four sampling periods (August 3rd, September 22nd, October 18th, and November 12th). To do so, flies were sorted into pools of five females and stored dry at −80℃. For each population at each of the four sample periods, we generated elemental composition data from three samples composed of four individuals in each sample. Each sample was dried at 60℃ for ∼72 hrs until they reached a constant dry mass and weighed using a microbalance (Mettler Toledo XP2U). An automated CHN analyzer (varioMicro Cube; Elementar Americas, Mt. Laurel, NJ, USA), was used to determine C and N concentrations for all Drosophila samples. To determine the concentrations of the other elements, we used an automated ICP-OES analyzer (iCAP 7400; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Before analysis, Drosophila ICP-OES samples were digested in 15 ml trace metal-free polypropylene conical centrifuge tubes (VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA) using a 2:1 mix of trace metal grade 67-70% HNO 3 (BDH Aristar ® Plus, VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA) and trace metal grade 30-32% H 2 O 2 (BDH Aristar ® Ultra, VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA). Each digested sample was diluted with Type 1 ultrapure water to a final concentration of 5% v/v of acid. Validation and calibration of the ICP-OES was achieved by using multi-element external reference standards (CCV Standard 1, CPI International, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). Additionally, an in-line Yttrium internal standard (Peak Performance Inorganic Y Standard, CPI International, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) was used to correct for any instrument drift or matrix effects. Digestion blanks were also run to correct for background concentrations. Concentrations of elements within samples that were within range of the standard deviations for the blank controls were excluded from further analysis, as these values are indicative of concentrations near or below the limit of detection of the ICP-OES. Nine elements (calcium, Ca; iron, Fe; potassium, K; magnesium, Mg; manganese, Mn; sodium, Na; phosphorus, P; sulfur, S; and zinc, Zn) were above detection limits, and the concentrations of these elements along with C and N (in μg/g) were log 10 -transformed before statistical analyses. Statistical analyses focused on testing predictions derived from the growth rate hypothesis and knowledge of ionoregulatory homeostasis challenges in response to cold temperatures. We tested for temporal evolution in C:P and N:P ratios and Mg content, all central to organismal growth rate, with the hypothesis that these ratios would decrease during periods of selection for increased reproductive output. In addition, we tested for evolution of Alkali metal content, which is critical to the maintenance of organismal homeostasis in ectotherms. A particular focus was testing for decrease in K content in response to seasonal cooling, as reduced content could reduce the onset of hyperkalemia, a major cause of loss of homeostasis and death in cold ( 39 , 64 , 65 ). We used linear mixed effects models with time treated as a fixed effect and population as a random effect test for evolution of each phenotypic and stoichiometric response. To assess significance we used a Wald chisq test (‘car’ package). There is little known about the pace of stoichiometric evolution (Lemmen 2019). To determine whether overall stoichiometric profiles show evidence of adaptation as evidenced by parallel change across replicates we conducted a principal components analysis, extracted values for PC1, and used a linear mixed effects model with time treated as a fixed effect and population as a random effect. Genomic sequencing and identification of candidate loci To assess the genomic basis of rapid evolution in response to seasonality we sequenced pools composed of 120 males and 80 females collected from each outdoor cage on September 22nd, October 18th, and November 12th. In addition, we also sequenced two pools of individuals from the founder population. We extracted DNA and prepared libraries using ∼500bp fragments for whole genome sequencing (KAPA Hyper Prep kit). Libraries were sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq systems with 150bp paired end reads. Reads were checked for quality using FastQC. Adapters were trimmed with Skewer ( 105 ) and reads with a quality score <20 were removed, and overlapping read pairs were merged with PEAR ( 106 ). We aligned reads to a reference genome composed of the Drosophila melanogaster reference sequence (v5 ( 107 )) using BWA ( 108 ), then removed duplicate reads with Picardtools and realigned remaining reads around indels with GATK’s IndelRealigner ( 109 ). After mapping and QC we retained an average of 83M mapped reads per sample at an average coverage (mosdepth ( 110 )) of 109x of the Drosophila melanogaster autosomes (range 92-133×) and average coverage 92× on the X chromosome. We then used PoPoolation2 ( 111 ) to obtain allele counts at segregating sites, discarding bases with quality 0.05% across all samples, and have at least 50 mapped reads total in every sample. Additionally, we excluded SNPs within repeat regions as defined by UCSC RepeatMasker ( 112 ). This yielded a dataset of ∼1.8 million SNPs. Identifying patterns of temporal genomic adaptation To identify the genomic architecture of adaptation we used generalized linear models (GLM) to test for parallel changes in allele frequency at each SNP over each experimental time interval. GLMs treated time-point as a fixed effect and used a ‘quasipoisson’ error model implemented through the glm tool from the stats R package. P -values for consecutive time-point and first to last time-point contrasts were extracted via the Emmeans R package. Resulting p -values were FDR adjusted with p.adjust from the stats r-package using the FDR method ( 113 ). To determine whether putative allele frequency differences were associated with structural variation we tested for hypergeometric overlap of significant outlier SNPs with linkage groups and known inversion regions ( 57 ). Additionally, we conducted gene ontology enrichment analysis for genes with SNPs showing strong signatures of selection, before and after FDR correction, using the BiNGO v3.0.5, implemented in Cytoscape v3.10.2 ( 114 , 115 ). Predicting loci under selection from experiments, genotype–phenotype linkages, and molecular pathways We tested for predictability by assessing the overlap between outlier sites exhibiting parallel temporal allele frequency change across replicates (‘adaptive sites’) and candidate loci where we had a priori predictions for a contribution to rapid adaptation. These candidate loci were derived from: 1) lists of SNPs and genes previously identified as involved in seasonal adaptation or adaptation over monthly intervals in similar temporal evolution experiments ( 57 , 72 ) (details in Table S2), 2) loci from genotype–phenotype mapping of fecundity and starvation tolerance ( 73 , 116 ), and 3) an a priori list of candidate genes based on knowledge of the molecular pathways involved in ion regulation in insects (Table S4). To test for the predictability of genomic architecture of adaptation the bedtools-intersect tool was used to examine the degree of overlap between candidate gene intervals ±500bp and all adaptive sites (GCF_000001215.4) ( 117 ). The lists of candidate SNPs and those within candidate gene regions were tested for significant hypergeometric overlap with adaptive sites using the phyper tool (stats R -package). In addition, to test whether entire sets of predictors enabled prediction we conducted one-way non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests using the wilcox.test function (stats R -package) to compare the overlap of candidates and matched sets of loci to adaptive sites. These tests were run using unadjusted GLM p-values at SNP- and gene-level resolutions. Matched genes were selected randomly from those that have a similar base pair length as candidates (±25%) and located on the same chromosome arm. Rank sum tests at the gene-level were conducted on lists of median p-values summarized per gene. At the SNP-level, sites in each gene pair were sampled to the minimum number of loci between the candidate or matched set gene prior to running rank sum tests. Each of these variations of rank sum tests were run for 1000 iterations of randomized matched set selection. We report the percentage of iterations producing p -values < 0.05 and the median p -value across all iterations. Author Contributions SMR and PSS designed the research in consultation with HAM and PDJ; SMR performed the field experiment; RES and PDJ generated elemental data; SMR, JFH, and SIG analyzed genomic data; SMR and RES analyzed phenotypic data and prepared figures; SMR wrote the paper with input from all authors. Funding This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) award numbers: R35 GM147264 to SMR and R01GM100366 and R01GM137430 to PSS and an NSERC Discovery Grant (#RGPIN-2025-04488) to HAM. The authors have no competing interests. Acknowledgements We thank August Goldfischer, Ozan Kiratli, and Subhash Rajpurohit for help with experiment procedures. Thank you to members of the Rudman Lab for helpful comments and to Timur Gabidulin for an illustration used in Figure 1 . Funder Information Declared National Institute of General Medical Sciences , R35GM147264 , R01GM100366 , R01GM137430 Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council , RGPIN-2025-04488 Footnotes Competing Interest Statement: The authors declare no competing interests. One sentence summary: The ecological frameworks of life history theory and ecological stoichiometry predict the direction of adaptive trait evolution, but the underlying genomic architecture of adaptation is not predictable. https://github.com/jfaberha/Drosophila_ICP_Rudman2017 References 1. ↵ G. Bell , Fluctuating selection: the perpetual renewal of adaptation in variable environments . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci . 365 , 87 – 97 ( 2010 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ P. Nosil , S. M. Flaxman , J. L. Feder , Z. Gompert , Increasing our ability to predict contemporary evolution . Nat. Commun . 11 , 1 – 6 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ S. J. Gould , Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history (WW Norton & Company , 1990 ). 4. ↵ M. Lässig , V. Mustonen , A. M. Walczak , Predicting evolution . Nat Ecol Evol 1 , 77 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. ↵ S. M. Carlson , C. J. Cunningham , P. A. Westley , Evolutionary rescue in a changing world . Trends Ecol. Evol . 29 , 521 – 530 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 6. M. T. Kinnison , N. G. Hairston Jr , A. P. Hendry , Cryptic eco-evolutionary dynamics . Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1360 , 120 – 144 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. ↵ A. M. Waldvogel , B. Feldmeyer , G. Rolshausen , Evolutionary genomics can improve prediction of species’ responses to climate change . Evolution ( 2020 ). 8. ↵ R. M. Nesse , S. C. Stearns , The great opportunity: Evolutionary applications to medicine and public health: Evolutionary applications to medicine and public health . Evol. Appl. 1 , 28 – 48 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 9. ↵ S. M. Rudman , M. Kreitzman , K. M. A. Chan , D. Schluter , Evosystem Services: Rapid Evolution and the Provision of Ecosystem Services . Trends Ecol. Evol . 32 , 403 – 415 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. ↵ N. McGranahan , C. Swanton , Clonal Heterogeneity and Tumor Evolution: Past, Present, and the Future . Cell 168 , 613 – 628 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ J. Penuelas , J. Sardans , J. Terradas , Increasing divergence between human and biological elementomes . Trends Ecol. Evol . 37 , 935 – 938 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ M. C. Urban , Climate change extinctions . Science 386 , 1123 – 1128 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ M. C. Urban , et al. , When and how can we predict adaptive responses to climate change? Evol Lett 8 , 172 – 187 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 14. ↵ M. Exposito-Alonso , et al. , Genomic basis and evolutionary potential for extreme drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana . Nat Ecol Evol 2 , 352 – 358 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl PubMed 15. ↵ D. L. Stern , V. Orgogozo , Is genetic evolution predictable? Science 323 , 746 – 751 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 16. R. B. Langerhans , Predictability and Parallelism of Multitrait Adaptation . J. Hered . 109 , 59 – 70 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl PubMed 17. ↵ D. I. Bolnick , R. D. H. Barrett , K. B. Oke , D. J. Rennison , Y. E. Stuart , (Non)Parallel Evolution . Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49 , 303 – 330 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 18. ↵ D. Schluter , ADAPTIVE RADIATION ALONG GENETIC LINES OF LEAST RESISTANCE . Evolution 50 , 1766 – 1774 ( 1996 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 19. ↵ J. R. Etterson , R. G. Shaw , Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming . Science 294 , 151 – 154 ( 2001 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 20. ↵ R. Morgan , M. H. Finnøen , H. Jensen , C. Pélabon , F. Jutfelt , Low potential for evolutionary rescue from climate change in a tropical fish . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 117 , 33365 – 33372 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 21. ↵ Z. Gompert , S. M. Flaxman , J. L. Feder , L.-M. Chevin , P. Nosil , Laplace’s demon in biology: Models of evolutionary prediction . Evolution ( 2022 ). doi: 10.1111/evo.14628 . OpenUrl CrossRef 22. ↵ D. J. Rennison , S. M. Rudman , D. Schluter , Genetics of adaptation: Experimental test of a biotic mechanism driving divergence in traits and genes . Evol Lett 3 , 513 – 520 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ C. Schlötterer , How predictable is adaptation from standing genetic variation? Experimental evolution in Drosophila highlights the central role of redundancy and linkage disequilibrium . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci . 378 , 20220046 ( 2023 ). 24. D. Garcia Castillo , et al. , Predicting rapid adaptation in time from adaptation in space: A 30-year field experiment in marine snails . Sci. Adv . 10 ( 2024 ). 25. ↵ O. Tenaillon , et al. , Tempo and mode of genome evolution in a 50,000-generation experiment . Nature 536 , 165 – 170 ( 2016 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 26. ↵ P. L. Munday , R. R. Warner , K. Monro , J. M. Pandolfi , D. J. Marshall , Predicting evolutionary responses to climate change in the sea . Ecol. Lett . 16 , 1488 – 1500 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. ↵ S. E. McGaugh , A. J. Lorenz , L. E. Flagel , The utility of genomic prediction models in evolutionary genetics . Proc. Biol. Sci . 288 , 20210693 ( 2021 ). 28. ↵ D. A. Roff , D. J. Fairbairn , The evolution of trade-offs: where are we? J. Evol. Biol . 20 , 433 – 447 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 29. ↵ J. R. David , P. Capy , Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations . Trends Genet . 4 , 106 – 111 ( 1988 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 30. ↵ S. Stearns , The evolution of life histories . Bookman ( 1992 ). 31. ↵ R. W. Sterner , J. J. Elser , Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere ( Princeton University Press , 2002 ). 32. ↵ K. Acharya , M. Kyle , J. J. Elser , Biological stoichiometry of Daphnia growth: An ecophysiological test of the growth rate hypothesis . Limnol. Oceanogr . 49 , 656 – 665 ( 2004 ). OpenUrl 33. ↵ J. Isanta-Navarro , et al. , Revisiting the growth rate hypothesis: Towards a holistic stoichiometric understanding of growth . Ecol. Lett . 25 , 2324 – 2339 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl PubMed 34. ↵ A. Hartwig , Role of magnesium in genomic stability . Mutat. Res . 475 , 113 – 121 ( 2001 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 35. ↵ Y. H. Ko , S. Hong , P. L. Pedersen , Chemical mechanism of ATP synthase. Magnesium plays a pivotal role in formation of the transition state where ATP is synthesized from ADP and inorganic phosphate . J. Biol. Chem . 274 , 28853 – 28856 ( 1999 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 36. ↵ D. J. Eide , et al. , Characterization of the yeast ionome: a genome-wide analysis of nutrient mineral and trace element homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Genome Biol . 6 , R77 ( 2005 ). 37. D. E. Salt , I. Baxter , B. Lahner , Ionomics and the study of the plant ionome . Annu. Rev. Plant Biol . 59 , 709 – 733 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 38. ↵ C. Prater , T. Phan , J. J. Elser , P. D. Jeyasingh , Understanding stoichiometric constraints on growth using resource use efficiency imbalances . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 121 , e2319022121 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl PubMed 39. ↵ J. Overgaard , H. A. MacMillan , The Integrative Physiology of Insect Chill Tolerance . Annu. Rev. Physiol . 79 , 187 – 208 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 40. ↵ J. Peñuelas , et al. , The bioelements, the elementome, and the biogeochemical niche . Ecology 100 , e02652 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl PubMed 41. ↵ S. M. Rudman , et al. , Ionome and elemental transport kinetics shaped by parallel evolution in threespine stickleback . Ecol. Lett . 22 , 645 – 653 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl PubMed 42. ↵ P. D. Jeyasingh , R. D. Cothran , M. Tobler , Testing the ecological consequences of evolutionary change using elements . Ecol. Evol . 4 , 528 – 538 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 43. ↵ K. D. Lemmen , L. Zhou , S. Papakostas , S. A. J. Declerck , An experimental test of the growth rate hypothesis as a predictive framework for microevolutionary adaptation . Ecology 104 , e3853 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 44. ↵ G. L. Conte , M. E. Arnegard , C. L. Peichel , D. Schluter , The probability of genetic parallelism and convergence in natural populations . Proc. Biol. Sci . 279 , 5039 – 5047 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 45. ↵ G. A. Roberts Kingman , et al. , Predicting future from past: The genomic basis of recurrent and rapid stickleback evolution . Sci Adv 7 ( 2021 ). 46. ↵ M. Barlow , B. G. Hall , Predicting evolutionary potential: in vitro evolution accurately reproduces natural evolution of the tem beta-lactamase . Genetics 160 , 823 – 832 ( 2002 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 47. ↵ R. D. H. Barrett , S. M. Rogers , D. Schluter , Natural selection on a major armor gene in threespine stickleback . Science 322 , 255 – 257 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 48. ↵ Y. Willi , et al. , Conservation genetics as a management tool: The five best-supported paradigms to assist the management of threatened species . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 119 , e2105076119 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 49. ↵ E. A. Boyle , Y. I. Li , J. K. Pritchard , An Expanded View of Complex Traits: From Polygenic to Omnigenic . Cell 169 , 1177 – 1186 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 50. ↵ W. G. Hill , A. Robertson , The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection . Genet. Res. (Camb.) 8 , 269 – 294 ( 1966 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 51. ↵ S. Via , R. Lande , Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity . Evolution 39 , 505 – 522 ( 1985 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 52. ↵ D. B. Stern , N. W. Anderson , J. A. Diaz , C. E. Lee , Genome-wide signatures of synergistic epistasis during parallel adaptation in a Baltic Sea copepod . Nat. Commun . 13 , 4024 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 53. ↵ S. P. Otto , Two steps forward, one step back: the pleiotropic effects of favoured alleles . Proc. Biol. Sci . 271 , 705 – 714 ( 2004 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 54. ↵ N. Barghi , et al. , Genetic redundancy fuels polygenic adaptation in Drosophila . PLoS Biol . 17 , e3000128 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 55. ↵ Á. J. Láruson , S. Yeaman , K. E. Lotterhos , The Importance of Genetic Redundancy in Evolution . Trends Ecol. Evol . 35 , 809 – 822 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 56. ↵ R. D. H. Barrett , et al. , Linking a mutation to survival in wild mice . Science 363 , 499 – 504 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 57. ↵ S. M. Rudman , et al. , Direct observation of adaptive tracking on ecological time scales in Drosophila . Science 375 , eabj7484 ( 2022 ). 58. ↵ R. Kofler , C. Schlötterer , A guide for the design of evolve and resequencing studies . Mol. Biol. Evol . 31 , 474 – 483 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 59. ↵ M. A. Phillips , M. K. Burke , Can laboratory evolution experiments teach us about natural populations? Mol. Ecol . 30 , 877 – 879 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 60. ↵ A. M. Leroi , S. B. Kim , M. R. Rose , The Evolution of Phenotypic Life-History Trade-Offs: An Experimental Study Using Drosophila melanogaster . Am. Nat . 144 , 661 – 676 ( 1994 ). OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science 61. A. K. Chippindale , T. J. F. Chu , M. R. Rose , COMPLEX TRADE-OFFS AND THE EVOLUTION OF STARVATION RESISTANCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER . Evolution 50 , 753 – 766 ( 1996 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 62. ↵ E. L. Behrman , S. S. Watson , K. R. O’Brien , M. S. Heschel , P. S. Schmidt , Seasonal variation in life history traits in two Drosophila species . J. Evol. Biol . 28 , 1691 – 1704 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 63. ↵ V. Kostál , J. Vambera , J. Bastl , On the nature of pre-freeze mortality in insects: water balance, ion homeostasis and energy charge in the adults of Pyrrhocoris apterus . J. Exp. Biol . 207 , 1509 – 1521 ( 2004 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 64. ↵ H. A. MacMillan , J. L. Andersen , S. A. Davies , J. Overgaard , The capacity to maintain ion and water homeostasis underlies interspecific variation in Drosophila cold tolerance . Sci. Rep . 5 , 18607 ( 2015 ). 65. ↵ S. C. Chalmer , S. M. Rudman , M. K. Andersen , P. Schmidt , H. A. MacMillan , Elemental stoichiometry and insect chill tolerance: Evolved and plastic changes in organismal Na+ and K+ content in Drosophila . Biol. Open bio . 060597 ( 2024 ). 66. ↵ D. Schluter , L. Nagel , Parallel speciation by natural selection . American Naturalist 146 , 292 – 301 ( 1995 ). OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science 67. ↵ J. Kingsolver , R. Huey , Size, temperature, and fitness: Three rules . Evolutionary Ecology Research 10 , 251 – 268 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl 68. ↵ K. Mudryk , et al. , How does Mg2+(aq) interact with ATP(aq)? Biomolecular structure through the lens of liquid-jet photoemission spectroscopy . J. Am. Chem. Soc . 146 , 16062 – 16075 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl PubMed 69. ↵ E. Hawkins , M. J. O’Donnell , Regulation of ooplasmic sodium and potassium activities in developing locust eggs . Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol . 20 , 23 – 34 ( 1992 ). OpenUrl 70. ↵ H. Kabil , O. Kabil , R. Banerjee , L. G. Harshman , S. D. Pletcher , Increased transsulfuration mediates longevity and dietary restriction in Drosophila . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 108 , 16831 – 16836 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 71. ↵ A. P. Hendry , T. J. Farrugia , M. T. Kinnison , Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations . Mol. Ecol . 17 , 20 – 29 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 72. ↵ M. C. Bitter , et al. , Continuously fluctuating selection reveals fine granularity of adaptation . Nature 634 , 389 – 396 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 73. ↵ T. F. C. Mackay , et al. , The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel . Nature 482 , 173 – 178 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 74. ↵ C. E. Hector , C. A. Bretz , Y. Zhao , E. C. Johnson , Functional differences between two CRF-related diuretic hormone receptors in Drosophila . J. Exp. Biol . 212 , 3142 – 3147 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 75. ↵ R. Gomulkiewicz , R. G. Shaw , Evolutionary rescue beyond the models . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci . 368 , 20120093 ( 2013 ). 76. ↵ S. P. Carroll , et al. , Applying evolutionary biology to address global challenges . Science 346 , 1245993 ( 2014 ). 77. ↵ Z. D. Blount , R. E. Lenski , J. B. Losos , Contingency and determinism in evolution: Replaying life’s tape . Science 362 ( 2018 ). 78. ↵ A. O. Bergland , E. L. Behrman , K. R. O’Brien , P. S. Schmidt , D. A. Petrov , Genomic Evidence of Rapid and Stable Adaptive Oscillations over Seasonal Time Scales in Drosophila . PLoS Genet . 10 , e1004775 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 79. ↵ H. E. Machado , et al. , Broad geographic sampling reveals the shared basis and environmental correlates of seasonal adaptation in Drosophila . Elife 10 ( 2021 ). 80. ↵ J. L. Graves Jr , et al. , Genomics of Parallel Experimental Evolution in Drosophila . Mol. Biol. Evol . 34 , 831 – 842 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 81. ↵ J. K. Beltz , M. C. Bitter , A. Goldfischer , D. A. Petrov , P. Schmidt , Variation in the resource environment affects patterns of seasonal adaptation at phenotypic and genomic levels in Drosophila melanogaster . Evol. Lett . qraf031 ( 2025 ). 82. ↵ R. S. Shahmohamadloo , A. R. Gabidulin , E. R. Andrews , S. M. Rudman , Microbiome evolution plays a secondary role in host rapid adaptation . bioRxivorg 2025.06. 27.661976 ( 2025 ). 83. ↵ A. P. Hendry , M. T. Kinnison , Perspective: The Pace of Modern Life: Measuring Rates of Contemporary Microevolution . Evolution 53 , 1637 – 1653 ( 1999 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 84. ↵ M. Lynch , W. Wei , Z. Ye , M. Pfrender , The Genome-wide Signature of Short-term Temporal Selection . bioRxiv 2023.04.28.538790 ( 2023 ). 85. ↵ M. Pfenninger , Q. Foucault , Population genomic time series data of a natural population suggests adaptive tracking of fluctuating environmental changes . Integr. Comp. Biol . 62 , 1812 – 1826 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 86. ↵ T. Flatt , Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster . Genetics 214 , 3 – 48 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 87. ↵ R. W. El-Sabaawi , K. D. Lemmen , P. D. Jeyasingh , S. A. J. Declerck , SEED: A framework for integrating ecological stoichiometry and eco-evolutionary dynamics . Ecol. Lett . 26 Suppl 1 , S109 – S126 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl PubMed 88. ↵ T. N. Grainger , J. M. Levine , Rapid evolution of life-history traits in response to warming, predation and competition: A meta-analysis . Ecol. Lett . 25 , 541 – 554 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 89. ↵ M. C. Urban , et al. , Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change . Science 353 ( 2016 ). 90. ↵ S. Berardi , et al. , Drosophila melanogaster pigmentation demonstrates adaptive phenotypic parallelism over multiple spatiotemporal scales . Evol. Lett . qraf008 ( 2025 ). 91. ↵ J. M. Comeron , R. Ratnappan , S. Bailin , The many landscapes of recombination in Drosophila melanogaster . PLoS Genet . 8 , e1002905 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 92. ↵ J. H. Gillespie , Genetic drift in an infinite population. The pseudohitchhiking model . Genetics 155 , 909 – 919 ( 2000 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 93. ↵ S. Yeaman , Genomic rearrangements and the evolution of clusters of locally adaptive loci . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 110 , E1743 – 51 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 94. ↵ M. Todesco , et al. , Massive haplotypes underlie ecotypic differentiation in sunflowers . Nature 584 , 602 – 607 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 95. ↵ D. M. Weinreich , R. Watson , L. Chao , Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic costraint on evolutionary trajectories . Evolution 59 ( 2005 ). 96. ↵ P. Nosil , et al. , Evolution repeats itself in replicate long-term studies in the wild . Sci. Adv . 10 , eadl3149 ( 2024 ). 97. ↵ M. R. Bernstein , S. Zdraljevic , E. C. Andersen , M. V. Rockman , Tightly linked antagonistic-effect loci underlie polygenic phenotypic variation in C. elegans: ANTAGONISTIC POLYGENES IN C. elegans . Evol. Lett . 3 , 462 – 473 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl PubMed 98. ↵ M. J. Wittmann , A. O. Bergland , M. W. Feldman , P. S. Schmidt , D. A. Petrov , Seasonally fluctuating selection can maintain polymorphism at many loci via segregation lift . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 114 , E9932 – E9941 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 99. ↵ M. Karageorgi , et al. , Beneficial reversal of dominance maintains a resistance polymorphism under fluctuating insecticide selection . ( 2025 ). 100. ↵ M. V. Rockman , The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that’s gold does not glitter . Evolution 66 , 1 – 17 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 101. ↵ G. M. Crutsinger , et al. , Testing a “genes-to-ecosystems” approach to understanding aquatic-terrestrial linkages . Mol. Ecol . 23 , 5888 – 5903 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 102. ↵ Y. T. Gutiérrez-Guerrero , M. Phifer-Rixey , M. W. Nachman , Across two continents: The genomic basis of environmental adaptation in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from the Americas . PLoS Genet . 20 , e1011036 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 103. ↵ J. R. David , et al. , Isofemale lines in Drosophila: an empirical approach to quantitative trait analysis in natural populations . Heredity (Edinb.) 94 , 3 – 12 ( 2005 ). OpenUrl PubMed 104. ↵ S. M. Rudman , et al. , Microbiome composition shapes rapid genomic adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 116 , 20025 – 20032 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 105. ↵ H. Jiang , R. Lei , S.-W. Ding , S. Zhu , Skewer: a fast and accurate adapter trimmer for next-generation sequencing paired-end reads . BMC Bioinformatics 15 , 182 ( 2014 ). 106. ↵ J. Zhang , K. Kobert , T. Flouri , A. Stamatakis , PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR . Bioinformatics 30 , 614 – 620 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 107. ↵ R. A. Hoskins , et al. , Sequence finishing and mapping of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin . Science 316 , 1625 – 1628 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 108. ↵ H. Li , R. Durbin , Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform . Bioinformatics 25 , 1754 – 1760 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 109. ↵ G. A. Van der Auwera , et al. , From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline . Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 43 , 11.10 . 1 – 33 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 110. ↵ B. S. Pedersen , A. R. Quinlan , Mosdepth: quick coverage calculation for genomes and exomes . Bioinformatics 34 , 867 – 868 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 111. ↵ R. Kofler , et al. , PoPoolation: a toolbox for population genetic analysis of next generation sequencing data from pooled individuals . PLoS One 6 , e15925 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 112. ↵ R. M. Kuhn , D. Haussler , W. J. Kent , The UCSC genome browser and associated tools . Brief. Bioinform . 14 , 144 – 161 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 113. ↵ Y. Benjamini , Y. Hochberg , Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing . J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol . 57 , 289 – 300 ( 1995 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 114. ↵ P. Shannon , et al. , Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks . Genome Res . 13 , 2498 – 2504 ( 2003 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 115. ↵ S. Maere , K. Heymans , M. Kuiper , BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of Gene Ontology categories in Biological Networks . Bioinformatics 21 , 3448 – 3449 ( 2005 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 116. ↵ M. F. Durham , M. M. Magwire , E. A. Stone , J. Leips , Genome-wide analysis in Drosophila reveals age-specific effects of SNPs on fitness traits . Nat. Commun . 5 , 4338 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 117. ↵ A. R. Quinlan , I. M. Hall , BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features . Bioinformatics 26 , 841 – 842 ( 2010 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted November 12, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Ecological stoichiometry and life history theory, not the identity of genomic variants, predict rapid adaptation Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Ecological stoichiometry and life history theory, not the identity of genomic variants, predict rapid adaptation Seth M. Rudman , Joshua J. Faber-Hammond , Ryan E. Sherman , René S. Shahmohamadloo , Sharon I. Greenblum , Heath A. MacMillan , Punidan D. Jeyasingh , Paul S. Schmidt bioRxiv 2025.11.11.687836; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.11.687836 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Ecological stoichiometry and life history theory, not the identity of genomic variants, predict rapid adaptation Seth M. Rudman , Joshua J. Faber-Hammond , Ryan E. Sherman , René S. Shahmohamadloo , Sharon I. Greenblum , Heath A. MacMillan , Punidan D. Jeyasingh , Paul S. Schmidt bioRxiv 2025.11.11.687836; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.11.687836 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Evolutionary Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7618) Biochemistry (17633) Bioengineering (13856) Bioinformatics (41841) Biophysics (21399) Cancer Biology (18529) Cell Biology (25422) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13352) Ecology (19860) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24282) Genetics (15582) Genomics (22462) Immunology (17700) Microbiology (40295) Molecular Biology (17140) Neuroscience (88419) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2823) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4813) Physiology (7632) Plant Biology (15107) Scientific Communication and Education (2042) Synthetic Biology (4284) Systems Biology (9808) Zoology (2267)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00