Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a report of 26 cases
other
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
This retrospective review of 26 laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies found a minimal complication rate, decreased hospital stay, and quicker return to normal activity compared to abdominal hysterectomy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. We have retrospectively studied the first twenty-six cases. All cases were reviewed and included in this report. The complication rate is very minimal and well below that which would be expected from abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy approach. The operative time is approximately double that of a standard approach; however, the hospital stay is greatly decreased and the patient's return to normal activity has been considerably shortened when compared to the standard abdominal procedure. We conclude that the operation is not only feasible, but should be considered any time an abdominal approach to hysterectomy is being contemplated.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-23T09:30:01.253652+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:34.315996+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine