Effect of propofol and sevoflurane on postoperative fatigue after laparoscopic hysterectomy
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This study investigated the impact of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative fatigue in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BackgroundPostoperative fatigue syndrome (POFS) is an important factor in postoperative recovery. However, the effect of anesthetic drugs on postoperative fatigue in female patients has been rarely studied. This study compared the effects of maintaining general anesthesia with propofol or sevoflurane on the incidence of POFS in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.MethodsThis prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Eligible patients were randomized into the propofol and sevoflurane groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of POFS within 30 Days, defined by a simplified identity consequence fatigue scale (ICFS-10) scores≥24 or Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores of fatigues>6. Secondary outcomes were perioperative grip strength, early ambulation and anal exhaust after surgery, and inpatient days.Results32 participants were assigned to the propofol group (P) and 33 to the sevoflurane group (S). Incidence of POFS on postoperative D1 was P (8/32) vs. S (10/33) (p = 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.4-27.00); D3 P (2/32) vs. S (5/33) (p = 0.45,95% CI:5.96-23.76). POFS were not found on postoperative D5 and D30. There were no differences in perioperative grip strength, early ambulation and anal exhaust after surgery, and inpatient days between the two groups.ConclusionsPOFS after scheduled laparoscopic hysterectomy was unaffected by anesthesia with propofol vs. sevoflurane. The incidence of POFS was highest on the first postoperative day, at 27.7%, and declined progressively over the postoperative 30 days. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR 2,000,033,861), registered on 14/06/2020).
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
References (35)
- Incidence and predictors of persistent pelvic pain following hysterectomy in women with chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Salpingo-oophorectomy at the Time of Benign Hysterectomy via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.035 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/bjs/znac384 via openalex
- doi:10.23736/s0375-9393.20.14358-x via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05483-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003677.pub5 via openalex
- doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32507-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.11.318 via openalex
- doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.652817 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.09.006 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.003 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/anae.14406 via openalex
- W4225709703 via openalex
- doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000001777 via openalex
- W6648949490 via openalex
- W6662977409 via openalex
- W6769131922 via openalex
- W6800828339 via openalex
- W6852807763 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01622-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(03)00615-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.03.002 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/anae.15682 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/bjs.9324 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/bjs.10577 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.038 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.2023.6621 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00003643-200108000-00008 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5110 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.11.073 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/anae.13909 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.029 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000001165 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106825 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:15:24.675520+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-19T06:31:22.526400+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK