Influence of antibiotic resistance on disinfectant tolerance of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium and Campylobacter jejuni

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,571 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Full text loading... Abstract Antibiotic resistant (AMR) bacteria are an increasing concern for human and animal medicine. As a result, biosecurity measures such as cleaning and disinfection are becoming heavily relied upon to eradicate and control AMR pathogens. However, evidence of co- and cross-resistance between antibiotics and disinfectants is rising. The influence of AMR on disinfectant tolerance is poorly understood for pathogens of veterinary and public health importance. Therefore, this study aimed to compare disinfectant tolerance of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni), Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), multi-drug-resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium), with their antibiotic susceptible counterparts. In vitro disinfectant efficacy was assessed, in the presence of organic matter, against a panel of eight disinfectants from six classes. The disinfectant efficacy varied widely depending on bacterial species and disinfectant class. Furthermore, approved disinfectant concentrations were not always deemed effective. All four bacterial species were typically most susceptible to aldehyde and/or QAC-based products. Mixed evidence was found to suggest a role of AMR in disinfectant tolerance; no role of AMR was identified in E. coli, whereas AMR C. jejuni and E. faecium were found to be more susceptible than their antibiotic-susceptible counterparts, whereas the opposite was found for S. aureus. - Received: - Version Posted:

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00