Proportionality in Public Health Emergencies: Legal, Policy, and Ethical Perspectives from the COVID-19 Pandemic

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

This scoping review explores the concept of proportionality at the intersection of law, public policy, and crisis management during the COVID-19 pandemic. The review identifies five central themes in the literature, focusing on proportionality as a regulatory tool in public sector crisis management. The pandemic necessitated global implementation of coercive measures to control virus spread, leading to significant infringements on human rights and raising critical questions about the permissible extent of administrative interventions. The aim is twofold: first, to address the controversial issue of decision-making under uncertainty by suggesting the application of the proportionality framework; second, to map key concepts, methods, and fields of study to identify research gaps related to proportionality in public health crisis decision-making. The findings emphasize the potential benefits of proportionality in structured crisis policy-making processes, aiding transparent decision-making and balancing rights and policy needs. This analysis provides valuable insights for policymakers, legal professionals, and public health authorities in navigating future crises.
Full text 6,342 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Proportionality in Public Health Emergencies: Legal, Policy, and Ethical Perspectives from the COVID-19 Pandemic | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 12 April 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Proportionality in Public Health Emergencies: Legal, Policy, and Ethical Perspectives from the COVID-19 Pandemic Author : Therese Sefton 0000-0002-7411-3310 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174449164.43681631/v1 235 views 94 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract This scoping review explores the concept of proportionality at the intersection of law, public policy, and crisis management during the COVID-19 pandemic. The review identifies five central themes in the literature, focusing on proportionality as a regulatory tool in public sector crisis management. The pandemic necessitated global implementation of coercive measures to control virus spread, leading to significant infringements on human rights and raising critical questions about the permissible extent of administrative interventions. The aim is twofold: first, to address the controversial issue of decision-making under uncertainty by suggesting the application of the proportionality framework; second, to map key concepts, methods, and fields of study to identify research gaps related to proportionality in public health crisis decision-making. The findings emphasize the potential benefits of proportionality in structured crisis policy-making processes, aiding transparent decision-making and balancing rights and policy needs. This analysis provides valuable insights for policymakers, legal professionals, and public health authorities in navigating future crises. Supplementary Material File (1proportionality in public health emergencies_ legal_policy_ and ethical perspectives from the covid-19 pandemic_author.docx) Download 466.39 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 12 April 2025 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords human rights legal frameworks policy-making precautionary principle proportionality Authors Affiliations Therese Sefton 0000-0002-7411-3310 [email protected] OsloMet - storbyuniversitetet Velferdsforskningsinstituttet View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 235 views 94 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Therese Sefton. Proportionality in Public Health Emergencies: Legal, Policy, and Ethical Perspectives from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Authorea . 12 April 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174449164.43681631/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.174449164.43681631/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a004af654a3052ad',t:'MTc3OTU0NTg1Ng=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00