Indications for Oophorectomy and Adnexectomy

In: Hysterectomy · 2017 · pp. 155–159 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_13 · W2755499262
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-08

Oophorectomy is indicated for suspicious or growing adnexal masses, reduces repeat surgery for endometriosis, but ovarian conservation is often preferable due to negative long-term health outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 6,338 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Oophorectomy is associated with decreased long-term health outcomes and ovarian conservation should be considered in many woman having pelvic surgery. Oophorectomy is indicated for women with an adnexal mass that is suspicious for malignancy or for a mass that increases in size or complexity when monitored with serial sonography. Adnexal torsion can usually be treated with de-torsion rather than adnexectomy. Oophorectomy decreases the likelihood of repeat surgery in women with severe, symptomatic endometriosis. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Judd H, Judd G, Lucas W, Yen S. Endocrine function of the postmentopausal ovary: concentration of androgens and estrogens in ovarian and peripheral vein blood. J Clin Endocrinl Metab. 1974;39:1020–4. Fogle R, Stanczyk F, Zhang X, Paulson R. Ovarian androgen production in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:3040–3. Parker W, Broder M, Liu Z, Shoupe D, Farquhar C, Berek J. Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:219–26. Parker WH, Feskanich D, Broder MS, Chang E, Shoupe D, Farquhar CM, Berek JS, Manson JE. Long-term mortality associated with oophorectomy compared with ovarian conservation in the nurses’ health study. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:709–16. Rocca W, Grossardt B, de Andrade M, Malkasian G, Melton J. Survival patterns after oophorectomy in premenopausal women: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:821–8. Rocca W, Bower J, Maraganore D, Ahlskog J, Grossardt B, de Andrade M, Melton L. Increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause. Neurology. 2007;69:1074–83. Nathorst-Böös J, von Schoultz B, Carlström K. Elective ovarian removal and estrogen replacement therapy–effects on sexual life, psychological well-being and androgen status. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;14(4):283–93. Elit L, Esplen MJ, Butler K, Narod S. Quality of life and psychosexual adjustment after prophylactic oophorectomy for a family history of ovarian cancer. Fam Cancer. 2001;1(3–4):149–56. Bachmann GA, Nevadunsky NS. Diagnosis and treatment of atrophic vaginitis. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(10):3090–6. Shifren JL, Avis NE. Surgical menopause: effects on psychological well-being and sexuality. Menopause. 2007;14(3 Pt 2):586–91. Buist DS, Newton KM, Miglioretti DL, Beverly K, Connelly MT, Andrade S, et al. Hormone therapy prescribing patterns in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:1042–50. Kurman RJ, Shih IM. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:433–43. SGO clinical practice statement: salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention, November 2013. Available at: https://www.sgo.org/clinical-practice/guidelines/sgo-clinical-practice-statement-salpingectomy-for-ovarian-cancer-prevention. Accessed 3/8/2015. Pavlik EJ, Ueland FR, Miller RW, Ubellacker JM, DeSimone CP, Elder J, Hoff J, Baldwin L, Kryscio RJ, van Nagell Jr JR. Frequency and disposition of ovarian abnormalities followed with serial transvaginal ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:210–7. Elder JW, Pavlik EJ, Long A, Miller RW, DeSimone CP, Hoff JT, Ueland WR, Kryscio RJ, van Nagell Jr JR, FR U. Serial ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian abnormalities with a morphology index. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135:8–12. SS B, Partridge E, Black A, et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2011;305:2295–303. Oelsner G, Shashar D. Adnexal torsion. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:459–63. Chen M, Chen CD, Yang YS. Torsion of the previously normal uterine adnexa. Evaluation of the correlation between the pathological changes and the clinical characteristics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:58–61. Bozdag G, Demir B, Calis PT, Zengin D, Dilbaz B. The impact of adnexal torsion on antral follicle count when compared with contralateral ovary. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:632–5. Cohen SB, Wattiez A, Seidman DS, Goldenberg M, Admon D, Mashiach S, Oelsner G. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for detorsion and sparing of twisted ischemic adnexa. JSLS. 2003;7:295–9. Cohen SB, Oelsner G, Seidman DS, Admon D, Mashiach S, Goldenberg M. Laparoscopic detorsion allows sparing of the twisted ischemic adnexa. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999;6:139–43. Pansky M, Smorgick N, Herman A, Schneider D, Halperin R. Torsion of normal adnexa in postmenarchal women and risk of recurrence. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:355–9. Boyd J, Sonoda Y, Federici MG, et al. Clinicopathologic features of BRCA-linked and sporadic ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2000;283:2260–5. GA MC, EL E. Hereditary cancer syndromes with high risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer: surgical options for personalized care. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:118–24. Vercellini P, Barbara G, Abbiati A, Somigliana E, Viganò P, Fedele L. Repetitive surgery for recurrent symptomatic endometriosis: what to do? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146:15–21. Namnoum AB, Hickman TN, Goodman SB, Gehlbach DL, Rock JA. Incidence of symptom recurrence after hysterectomy for endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(5):898–902. Shakiba K, Bena JF, McGill KM, Minger J, Falcone T. Surgical treatment of endometriosis: a 7-year follow-up on the requirement for further surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1285–92. Tang Y, SL C, Chen X, YX H, DS Y, Guo W, HY Z, XH Y. Ovarian damage after laparoscopic endometrioma excision might be related to the size of cyst. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:464–9. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2018 Springer International Publishing Switzerland About this chapter Cite this chapter Parker, W.H. (2018). Indications for Oophorectomy and Adnexectomy. In: Alkatout, I., Mettler, L. (eds) Hysterectomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_13 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_13 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22496-1 Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22497-8 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (29)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK