Modified hysterosalpingography during infertility work-up: use of contrast medium and saline to investigate mechanical factors

J. Shalev; Haim Krissi; Joseph Blankstein; Israel Meizner; Zion Ben‐Rafael; Dov Dicker

doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00632-4

Modified hysterosalpingography during infertility work-up: use of contrast medium and saline to investigate mechanical factors

J. Shalev, Haim Krissi, Joseph Blankstein, Israel Meizner, Zion Ben‐Rafael, Dov Dicker

In: Fertility and Sterility · 2000 · vol. 74(2) , pp. 372–375 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00632-4 · PMID:10927061 · W2020264816

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 5 in-corpus citations

View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-29 ⓘ

Modified hysterosalpingography using contrast medium and saline effectively visualized the uterine cavity and tubal patency while significantly reducing patient pain compared to standard procedures.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of modified hysterosalpingography using <3 mL amount of contrast medium followed by injection of saline to minimize the adverse effects associated with the procedure.DesignFor modified hysterosalpingography, 1-2 mL of water-soluble contrast medium were injected to visualize the uterine cavity, followed by injection of 10 mL of saline to check tubal patency and spillage. A control group of patients underwent hysterosalpingography with undiluted contrast medium.SettingTeaching hospital.Patient(s)Seventy-eight infertile women [study (n = 40)/control (n = 38) groups].Intervention(s)Modified and standard hysterosalpingography.Main outcome measure(s)Assessment of uterine cavity, tubal patency, and sensation of pain during modified hysterosalpingography was compared with that during standard hysterosalpingography.Result(s)Uterine cavity and tubal patency were properly visualized during modified hysterosalpingography. Saline pushed the contrast medium successfully from the uterine cavity through the open fallopian tubes and into the pelvic cavity. The study group reported significantly less pain than did the control group. Between-group differences were statistically significant when pain perception (no pain vs. minimal pain vs. severe pain; no pain vs. any kind of pain) was analyzed by type of adnexal pathology (bilateral passage or unilateral passage).Conclusion(s)Modified hysterosalpingography was sufficient to diagnose tubal and pelvic mechanical factors. The procedure was associated with a significant reduction in self-reported pain and no medical complications.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

infertility

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (4)

References (7)

Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome via openalex
The role of transvaginal ultrasonography In the direction of pelvic pathologies in the infertility workup via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44293-7 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47229-8 via openalex
doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55338-2 via openalex
W2581910945 via openalex
W4290462712 via openalex

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

openalex: last seen: 2026-05-11T06:22:51.059792+00:00
unpaywall: last seen: 2026-08-14T06:25:32.811723+00:00

License: CC0 · commercial use OK

[1] Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome 1999

[2] The role of transvaginal ultrasonography In the direction of pelvic pathologies in the infertility workup 1998