Evaluation of a novel isothermal microcalorimetry-based sterility test

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,276 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Parenteral drugs must meet strict release criteria to ensure patient safety upon administration. Sterility is a critical requirement, and is typically assessed using the compendial U.S. Pharmacopoeia (USP) sterility test. However, with the growing demand to reduce batch release times, the test’s 14-day incubation period is becoming a concern, emphasizing the need for more rapid alternatives. Here, we compared the performance of the calScreener+ isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) device (Symcel) to that of the compendial USP sterility test, using a panel of sixteen microorganisms (six USP reference strains and ten field isolates) in two inoculum sizes (100 and 5 CFU). The IMC-based method detected a higher number of positive samples compared to the compendial method (95.8% vs 87.5%; p < 0.05). Furthermore, IMC was consistently faster, reducing mean detection times from 43 hours to 19 hours at 100 CFU and from 46 hours to 28 hours at 5 CFU (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the calScreener+ IMC device shows promise as a rapid and sensitive alternative to the compendial sterility test, with the potential to speed up batch releases without compromising patient safety. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00