Introduction
Mitochondrial protein import has been studied since many decades and the machineries and
mechanisms of the process are well understood (1, 2, 3). Historically, essentially all
experimental studies of protein import have been restricted to yeast and mammals, which
belong to the same eukaryotic supergroup of the Opisthokonts (4).
In the last decade, studies in the parasitic protozoan Trypanosoma brucei, a member of the
Discoba group, revealed that its mitochondrial protein translocases are highly diverged when
compared to Opisthokonts (5, 6, 7). The most extreme differences are found in the translocases
of the inner membrane (TIM). Most eukaryotes have two TIM complexes, TIM23 and TIM22 (8, 9,
10, 11), that are specialized to import presequence-containing proteins and mitochondrial
carrier proteins with multiple transmembrane domains, respectively. Trypanosomes, however,
have a single bifunctional TIM complex that, with minor compositional variations, imports both
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
3
types of substrates (12). Moreover, of all six integral membrane subunits of the trypanosomal
TIM complex (12), the only one showing homology to any subunit of the TIM23 and TIM22
complexes of other eukaryotes is TbTim17 (13), an orthologue of Tim22 (14).
The energy requirements for mitochondrial protein import have mainly been studied in yeast
and mammals (15). It has been shown that the inner membrane (IM) potential (ΔΨ) is required
for electrophoretic translocation of the basic presequences across the TIM23 complex (16). The
subsequent translocation of the mature part of import substrates depends on ATP and is
mediated by mitochondrial Hsp70 (mHsp70), the core component of the presequence
translocase-associated motor (PAM) (10, 17). Also in T. brucei, the ΔΨ is required to import
presequence-containing substrates (18) and a modified PAM mediates ATP-dependent protein
translocation (18, 19, 20, 21). Substrates of the yeast TIM22 complex do not require ATP but
depend on the ΔΨ for both substrate docking and membrane insertion (22). In T. brucei,
insertion of mitochondrial carrier proteins by the TIM complex also appears to depend on the
ΔΨ, however, what precise role it plays is unknown (23).
Import substrates have a variable number of positive charges in their presequences and the
mature parts of the proteins. Thus, conditions influencing the ΔΨ can affect protein import in a
substrate-specific manner (24). While it is not fully understood how mitochondria guarantee
import of proteins under both high and low ΔΨ conditions, this ability is likely important to
maintain proper proteostasis.
The life cycle of T. brucei involves a tsetse fly vector and a mammalian host (25). The procyclic
form (PCF) in the fly gut and the disease-causing long slender bloodstream form (BSF) have very
different energy metabolisms (26, 27). Both life cycle stages can be grown in culture and
therefore are excellent systems to study the effects this has on mitochondrial protein import.
PCFs produce most ATP by oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) (28) (Fig. S1A), which requires
proteins encoded on the mitochondrial genome, termed kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) in
trypanosomes. BSFs produce most, if not all, ATP by glycolysis (29). Their mitochondria lack
OXPHOS complexes, except for the FoF1-ATPase, which consumes ATP to generate the ΔΨ
required for protein import and metabolite transport (30, 31) (Fig. S1B). Therefore, although
BSFs are not capable of OXPHOS, they still depend on the kDNA, because subunit a of the Fo-
ATPase (32), ribosomal RNAs and two mitoribosomal proteins (33) are mitochondrially-
encoded.
T. b. equiperdum and T. b. evansi, two subspecies of T. brucei, which lack most of or even all
kDNA, cannot grow in the fly but are able to infect horses and a variety of mammals,
respectively (34). Growth of the BSFs of these subspecies is possible due to specific mutations
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
4
in their nucleus-encoded g-subunit of the Fo-ATPase, which compensates for the lack of kDNA-
encoded subunit a (30, 35, 36, 37). The best evidence for this scenario is that a transgenic BSF
T. brucei strain carrying a L262P mutation in one allele of the g-subunit of the F1-ATPase, termed
gL262P strain, grows as well as wild-type BSF even in the absence of kDNA, at least in vitro in
rich medium (36) (Fig. S1C, S1D). In absence of kDNA and subunit a, the F1 and Fo parts of the
ATPase are uncoupled (Fig. S1D). The gL262P mutation likely allows efficient ATP-hydrolysis by
the uncoupled F1-part to enhance electrogenic exchange of cytosolic ATP4− for an excess of
mitochondrial ADP3− by the ADP/ATP carrier, creating a ΔΨ of sufficient magnitude to allow cell
growth (36). It is important to note that the concept of ΔΨ generation in the absence of the
mitochondrial genome described above is not unique to trypanosomes, but was first
discovered in petite mutants of yeast (38).
Here, we have analyzed the function of TbTim20, a subunit of the single trypanosomal TIM
complex (39). We show that the protein is essential for normal growth of the gL262P strain
lacking the kDNA, but not for kDNA-containing PCFs and BSFs when grown under standard
conditions. Our results support a scenario that TbTim20 assists import of a subset of proteins,
whose import is sensitive to a low ΔΨ.
Results
TbTim20 is an intermembrane space-localized TIM subunit
We have previously identified TbTim20 and TbTim15 as novel kinetoplastid-specific subunits of
the trypanosomal TIM complex (39). Unlike the soluble intermembrane space (IMS)-localized
TbTim15, RNAi-mediated depletion of TbTim20 did not affect growth of PCF cells, raising the
question what its function might be.
Combining stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) with co-
immunoprecipitation (CoIP) and quantitative mass spectrometric analyses in PCF T. brucei
using either TbTim20 or TbTim15 as baits (Fig. 1A, 1B) recovered TbTim20, TbTim15 and the
membrane integral IM protein TimRhom I as the three most enriched proteins (including the
baits) followed by essentially all other known TIM (12) and PAM subunits (Table S1, S2) (19).
These results suggest a close association of TbTim20, TbTim15 and TimRhom I. Intriguingly,
TbTim20 and TimRhom I are selectively associated with the active presequence but not the
carrier translocase (12).
Erv1 is a conserved protein that mediates import of IMS-localized substrates. Thus, the fact that
TbTim20, similar to TbTim15 (39), was depleted upon TbErv1 RNAi indicates its localization in
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
5
the IMS (40) (Fig. 1C). Protease protection assays using mitochondria and mitoplasts (i.e.
isolated mitochondria with disrupted outer membrane) confirmed that both the N- and the C-
terminus of TbTim20 are exposed to the IMS (Fig. 1D). Although TbTim20 contains no predicted
transmembrane domains, it is tightly associated with the IM, as shown by its recovery in the
pellet of an alkaline carbonate extraction (39). The structure of TbTim20 predicted by
AlphaFold2 (41) consists of a bundle of a-helices (Fig. S2).
TbTim20 is essential in kDNA-lacking gL262P cells
RNAi-mediated depletion of TbTim20 has no impact on growth of PCF (39), BSF wild-type cells
(New York single marker, NYsm) (Fig. 2A), or the BSF kDNA-containing gL262P(+kDNA) strain
(Fig. 2B, left panel). However, in the gL262P(-kDNA) TbTim20 RNAi cell line, where the kDNA was
removed by ethidium bromide treatment, TbTim20 depletion led to a growth arrest (Fig. 2B, right
panel). Note the gL262P mutation does not disrupt association of TbTim20 with the TIM
complex (Fig. S3).
kDNA-lacking gL262P cells are hypersensitive to a protonophore
In both wild-type BSFs (NYsm) and heterozygous gL262P(+/-kDNA) cells, ATP hydrolysis by the
ATPase supports the generation of the ΔΨ (Fig. S1B, S1C, S1D). F1 Fo-ATPase can directly
generate the ΔΨ via ATP-hydrolysis-powered proton pumping (Fig. S1B, S1C). The kDNA
encoded subunit a forms the proton-entry and -exit channel. Thus, in the absence of kDNA,
proton translocation by the ATPase is no longer possible because the F1 and Fo parts of the
ATPase are functionally uncoupled, leaving ΔΨ generation to the ADP/ATP carrier, presumably
supported by the gL262P-containing F1-ATPase (Fig. S1D) (42). As mitochondrial protein import
across the IM depends on the ΔΨ, the selective requirement for TbTim20 in gL262P(-kDNA) cells
might be due to a lower ΔΨ in these cells when compared to gL262P(+kDNA) cells.
Sensitivity to the protonophore carbonylcyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP)
can serve as a proxy for the magnitude of the in vivo ΔΨ. Thus, we determined the half maximal
inhibitory concentration (IC50) of FCCP for all three cell populations using the Alamar blue
viability assay. Fig. 2C shows that wild-type BSF (NYsm) cells were most resistant to FCCP,
whereas gL262P(+kDNA) cells showed a medium and gL262P(-kDNA) cells the highest
sensitivity to the protonophore. These results suggest that, as proposed above, the in vivo ΔΨ is
higher in gL262P(+kDNA) than in gL262P(-kDNA) cells. Moreover, wild-type BSFs (NYsm) appear
to have a higher in vivo ΔΨ than gL262P(+kDNA) cells. FCCP sensitivity was also influenced by
TbTim20. The ratio between the generation times of the uninduced and induced TbTim20 RNAi
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
6
cell lines at the indicated FCCP concentration declined for gL262P(+kDNA) and gL262P(-kDNA)
cells, whereas wild-type BSF (NYsm) cells were only marginally affected (Fig. 2D).
Loss of kDNA reduces ΔΨ of gL262P cells
FCCP sensitivity of cells serves as a proxy for the ΔΨ, but it does not directly measure it. To
assess to which extent mitochondria of the three cell lines can develop a ΔΨ, we used the
fluorescent dye safranine O as a quantitative indicator of the ΔΨ. Addition of 1 mM ATP resulted
in a strong and comparable decrease in safranine O fluorescence in permeabilized wild-type
BSFs (NYsm) and gL262P(+kDNA) cells, indicative of the formation of the ΔΨ (Fig. 2E, black and
blue curves). However, the ATP-induced decrease in fluorescence observed in gL262P(-kDNA)
cells was greatly diminished under the same conditions (Fig. 2E, red curve). The subsequent
stepwise addition of FCCP (20 nM each) resulted in a corresponding stepwise depolarization of
the ΔΨ which was complete at 140 nM FCCP (Fig. 2F). Whereas mitochondria of wild-type BSFs
(NYsm) and gL262P(+kDNA) cells exhibited a comparable ΔΨ, the magnitude of the ΔΨ
produced by gL262P(-kDNA) cells was much reduced.
The results for the gL262P(+ or -kDNA) cells are in agreement with their observed in vivo FCCP
sensitivity (Fig. 2C). However, wild-type BSFs (NYsm) and gL262P(+kDNA) have different in vivo
FCCP sensitivities even though the ΔΨ they can produce in permeabilized cells under standard
conditions is very similar (Fig. 2E). A possible explanation for this could be that the intracellular
ATP levels are different in wild-type BSFs (NYsm) and gL262P(+kDNA) cells, suggesting that in
vivo wild-type BSFs (NYsm) cells can generate a higher ΔΨ.
TbTim20-depletion changes the mitochondrial proteome in kDNA-lacking gL262P cells
Fig. 3 shows proteomic comparisons between crude mitochondrial fractions of uninduced and
induced gL262P(-kDNA) TbTim20 RNAi cells. This allows the global identification of import
substrates that require TbTim20 for efficient import. As expected, TbTim20 was efficiently
depleted (4.6-fold). A total of 1729 proteins were quantified, 363 of them were reported to be
part of the BSF mitochondrial proteome based on a previous study (43) (Table S3). Of the
remaining 1366 proteins five were predicted to contain a mitochondrial presequence resulting
in a total number of 368 detected putative BSF mitochondrial proteins. Whereas of the 1729
quantified proteins 13% were depleted more than 1.5-fold, this fraction rose to 42% when only
putative BSF mitochondrial proteins were considered, indicating that in the absence of kDNA a
subset of mitochondrial proteins requires TbTim20 for efficient import. 94 of the 368 putative
BSF mitochondrial proteins were predicted by TargetP (44) to contain N-terminal
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
7
presequences, and 75% of these were depleted more than 1.5-fold (Fig. 3A, Table S3). These
Material and methods
Transgenic cell lines
Transgenic T. brucei cell lines are based on the PCF strain 29-13 (47) or the BSF wild-type strain
(NYsm) (47) and γL262P (36). PCF cells were grown in SDM-79 or in SDM-80 (48) at 27°C, BSF
parasites were grown in HMI9 (49) at 37°C, both supplemented with 10% (v/v) foetal calf serum
(FCS). To induce loss of kDNA γL262P cells were cultured in presence of 10 nM ethidium
bromide (EtBr) starting three days before the start of the respective experiment.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
9
Plasmids for ectopic expression of C-terminal triple HA-tagged TbTim15 (Tb927.2.4445) and
TbTim20 (Tb927.11.1620) have been described before (39). To generate a plasmid for ectopic
expression of N-terminal triple HA-tagged TbTim20 the complete ORF was amplified by PCR
and cloned into a modified pLew100 vector (47), which encodes a puromycin resistance gene
and a N-terminal triple HA-tag (50).
The PCF TbTim20 RNAi cell line and the plasmids used to generate the TbTim20 BSF NYsm,
gL262P RNAi cell line have been described before (39). Also the TbErv1 RNAi cell line has been
described previously (40).
Antibodies
Commercially available antibodies were: mouse anti-HA (Sigma-Aldrich, dilution immunoblot
(IB): 1:5’000). Antibodies previously produced in our laboratory are: polyclonal rabbit anti-
ATOM40 (51) (dilution IB: 1:10’000), polyclonal rabbit anti-ATOM69 (51) (dilution WB: 1:50),
polyclonal rabbit anti-Tim9 (12) (dilution IB: 1:40), polyclonal rat anti-TbTim17 (12) (dilution IB:
1:300), polyclonal rabbit anti-TbPam27 (39) (dilution IB: 1:200) and polyclonal rabbit anti-
TbTim15 (39) (dilution IB: 1:250-500). Monoclonal anti-TbmHsp70 (52) (dilution IB: 1:1’000) has
described before. Secondary antibodies used were: goat anti-mouse IRDye 680LT conjugated
(LI-COR Biosciences, dilution IB: 1:20’000), goat anti-rabbit IRDye 800CW conjugated (LI-COR
Biosciences, dilution IB 1:20’000) and goat ani-rat IRDye 680LT conjugated (LI-COR
biosciences, dilution IB 1:10’000).
Digitonin extractions and protease protection assays
Generation of mitochondria-enriched digitonin pellets has been described in detail before (53).
To generate mitoplasts, mitochondria-enriched digitonin pellets were incubated in a buffer
containing 15 mM Tris base, 12 mM KH2PO4, 15 mM MgSO4, 0.5 M sorbitol pH 7.2 and 0.05%
digitonin for 5 min at 4°C followed by centrifugation (6’700 g, 5 min, 4°C) yielding a pellet
consisting of mitoplasts. Mitochondria-enriched pellets and mitoplasts were then resuspended
in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris base, 15 mM KH2PO4, 20 mM MgSO4 and 0.6 M sorbitol pH 7.2
which was supplemented with 0.05 mg/ml proteinase K and/or 1% Triton X100, respectively.
The resulting samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.
Co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP)
The CoIP experiment shown in Fig. S3 was performed as follows. A mitochondria-enriched
pellet from 1x108 gL262P(+kDNA) cells expressing TbTim20-HA was generated by digitonin
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
10
extraction as described before (53). This crude mitochondrial fraction was solubilized in 20 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1X Protease Inhibitor mix (Roche,
EDTA-free), and 1% (w/v) digitonin) for 15 min at 4°C. After centrifugation (20’000 g, 15 min, 4°C)
the lysate was transferred to 50 μl HA bead slurry (anti-HA affinity matrix, Roche), which had
been equilibrated in wash buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1 mM EDTA, 100 mM
NaCl, 10% glycerol and 0.2% (w/v) digitonin. After incubation in an end-over-end shaker for at
least one hour at 4°C, the supernatant containing the unbound proteins was removed. After
washing the bead slurry three times with wash buffer, the bound proteins were eluted by boiling
the resin for 5 min in 60 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) containing 2% SDS. 5% of both the input and the
unbound proteins, and 100% of the IP sample were analysed by SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotting.
Fluorescence microscopy
gL262P(+/-kDNA) cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, postfixed in cold
methanol, and mounted using VectaShield containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)
(Vector Laboratories). Images were acquired by a DMI6000B microscope and a DFC360 FX
monochrome camera (both Leica Microsystems).
RNA extraction and northern blotting
Acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction to isolate total RNA from
uninduced and induced (two days) RNAi cells was done as described before (54). To determine
RNAi efficiency, the resulting RNA was used for RT-PCR or northern blotting as described
previously (53).
SILAC CoIP experiments
PCF cells inducibly expressing TbTim15-HA or TbTim20-HA were washed in PBS and
resuspended in SDM-80 (55) containing 5.55 mM glucose, 10% dialyzed FCS (BioConcept,
Switzerland) and either light (12C6/14Nχ) or heavy (13C6/15Nχ) isotopes of arginine (1.1 mM) and
lysine (0.4 mM) (Eurisotope). To ensure complete labelling of all proteins with heavy amino
acids, the cells were grown in SILAC medium for six to ten doubling times.
Digitonin-extracted mitochondria-enriched pellets of 4 x 108 uninduced and one day induced
cells were mixed and subjected to CoIP as described above. SILAC experiments were executed
in three (TbTim20-HA) or four (TbTim15-HA) biological replicates including a label-switch and
analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
11
Proteomic analysis of gL262P(-kDNA) TbTim20 RNAi cells
gL262P TbTim20 RNAi cells were pretreated with 10 nM ethidium bromide (EtBr) starting three
days before RNAi induction to induce loss of the kDNA. Digitonin-extracted, mitochondria-
enriched pellets were generated from uninduced and two days induced BSF gL262P(-kDNA)
TbTim20-RNAi cells and analysed by quantitative LC-MS.
Quantitative LC-MS and data analysis
Samples from SILAC CoIP and TbTim20 RNAi experiments were processed for LC-MS analysis
as described before (40, 56) and measured using an Orbitrap Elite (TbTim20 CoIPs) or a Q
Exactive Plus (TbTim15 CoIPs, TbTim20 RNAi experiments) mass spectrometer coupled to an
UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano HPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany). Proteins were
identified using MaxQuant/Andromeda (versions 1.6.3.4, 2.0.2.0 and 2.5.1.0 for TbTim20 CoIPs,
TbTim15 CoIPs, or TbTim20 RNAi experiments, respectively) (57, 58) and a fasta file containing
the protein sequences for T. brucei TREU927 downloaded from the TriTrypDB
(https://tritrypdb.org; versions 8.1 and 55). MaxQuant was operated using default settings with
the exception that only one unique peptide was required for protein identification.
For the analysis of SILAC data from CoIP experiments, Lys8/Arg10 were set as heavy labels and
the option “requantify” was enabled. Quantification was based on ≥ one SILAC peptide pair.
Proteins significantly enriched in TbTim15 or TbTim20 complexes were identified using the rank
sum method (56, 59, 60). The rank sum (i.e., the arithmetic mean of the ranks of a protein in all
replicates based on normalized abundance ratios) was converted into FDR-controlled q-values.
Effects of TbTim20 depletion on the mitochondrial proteome of BSF γL262P(-kDNA) cells were
analyzed by label-free quantification using MaxQuant LFQ intensities. Only proteins present in
at least 3/4 replicates of control samples (-Tet) were considered for further analysis. For each
individual experiment, the median of LFQ intensities was shifted to the median of all medians.
Next, LFQ intensities were transformed by variance stabilizing data normalization (vsn) (61).
Missing intensities were imputed by (i) the median value of the existing three replicates for
control samples (-Tet) and (ii) minimum value imputation applying a downshift of 1.8 standard
deviations and a width of 0.3 for tetracycline-treated samples (+Tet). Protein abundance ratios
(+/- Tet) were calculated and q-values determined following the “linear models for microarray
data” (limma) approach (62, 63) using the Benjamini-Hochberg method (64) for p-value
correction.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
12
Information about proteins identified and quantified in LC-MS experiments are available in
Tables S1 - S3.
ΔΨ measurements
The ΔΨ of digitonin-permeabilized T. brucei cells was determined using the fluorescent dye
Safranin O. 2x107 cells were harvested by centrifugation (10 min, 1500 g) and washed in ANT
buffer containing 8 mM KCl, 110 mM K-gluconate, 10 mM mannitol, 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM free
acid HEPES, 10 mM K2HPO4, 0.015mM EGTA potassium salt, 0.5 mg/ml fatty acid-free bovine
serum albumin, and 1.5 mM MgCl2 at pH 7.25. The cell pellet was resuspended in 2 ml of ANT
buffer with addition of 5 µM Safranin O (Sigma, S2255) and 4 µM digitonin. Fluorescence was
recorded in a Hitachi F-7100 spectrofluorometer (Hitachi High Technologies) at a 5- Hz
acquisition rate, using 495 nm excitation and 585 nm emission wavelengths. ATP was added ad
1 mM to induce the membrane polarization. To assess the levels of ΔΨ generated, FCCP was
titrated starting at 20 nM going up to 140 nM. Samples were measured at room temperature and
stirred during the experiment.
Alamar blue assays
Each cell line was inoculated in a transparent flat-bottomed 96-well plate at a density of
1x104cells /ml in a total volume of 100µL of culture medium. Cells were grown at various
concentrations of FCCP ranging from 0.025 µM to 166 µM and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2
for 45 hours. Subsequently, 10 µl resazurin in PBS (0.5 mM) was added to each well and the
cells were incubated for the next 3 hours. Fluorescence was then measured using the Tecan
M1000 infinite pro plate reader at a wavelength of 536 nm for excitation and 588 nm for
emission. The data was analyzed with GraphPad Prism 10.0 software using nonlinear regression
and sigmoidal dose–response analysis.
Correlation analysis: TbTim20-dependency versus N-terminal positive charges or pI
Protein sequences were retrieved from the TREU927 reference genome on TriTrypDB (65) and
the pI and net charge used for Fig. S4 were calculated as follows. The isoelectric point (pI) of all
quantified proteins predicted to have a mitochondrial presequence (n=94) (identified by
TargetP) (44) was calculated in R (version 4.3.2) using the package Peptides (version 2.4.6)
(function: pI, pKscale: EMBOSS) (66). The theoretical net charge of the first 20 aa of the same
proteins was calculated scoring arginine and lysine residues as (+1) and aspartate and
glutamate residues as (-1). (+1) was added to all final scores to take into account the
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
13
protonation on the N-terminus. The final value corresponds to the theoretical net charge at
approximately pH 7.4.
Data availability
The mass spectrometry proteomcis data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange
Consortium (67) via the PRIDE (68) partner repository and are accessible using the dataset
identifiers PXD061390 (TbTim20 CoIP data), PXD061391 (TbTim15 CoIP data), and PXD061395
(TbTim20 RNAi data).
Acknowledgments
We thank Elke Horn and Thomas Morgenbrodt for excellent technical assistance, Pascal Mäser
for help with the Alamar blue assays, Julian Bender for support in proteomics data analysis, and
Christos Chinopoulos from Semmelweis University (Hungary) for helpful discussions. Research
in the lab of BW was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German
Research Foundation) – SPP2453 Project ID 541758684. AZ was funded by OP JAK
CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004575 RNA for therapy, co-funded by the European Union and by the
European Research Council project no. European Union and by the European Research
Council. ASchneider was supported in part by NCCR RNA & Disease, a National Centre of
Competence in Research (grant number 205601) and by project grant SNF 205200 both funded
by the Swiss National Science Foundation. (69)
References
1. Busch JD, Fielden LF, Pfanner N, Wiedemann N. Mitochondrial protein transport:
Versatility of translocases and mechanisms. Mol Cell. 2023;83(6):890-910.
2. Chacinska A, Koehler CM, Milenkovic D, Lithgow T, Pfanner N. Importing
mitochondrial proteins: machineries and mechanisms. Cell. 2009;138:628-44.
3. Harbauer AB, Zahedi RP, Sickmann A, Pfanner N, Meisinger C. The protein import
machinery of mitochondria-a regulatory hub in metabolism, stress, and disease. Cell Metab.
2014;19(3):357-72.
4. Burki F, Roger AJ, Brown MW, Simpson AGB. The New Tree of Eukaryotes. Trends
Ecol Evol. 2019.
5. Schneider A. Evolution and diversification of mitochondrial protein import systems.
Current opinion in cell biology. 2022;75:102077.
6. Schneider A. Evolution of mitochondrial protein import - lessons from trypanosomes.
Biological chemistry. 2020;401(6-7):663-76.
7. Harsman A, Schneider A. Mitochondrial protein import in trypanosomes: Expect the
unexpected. Traffic. 2017;18(2):96-109.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
14
8. Kizmaz B, Nutz A, Egeler A, Herrmann JM. Protein insertion into the inner membrane
of mitochondria: routes and mechanisms. FEBS Open Bio. 2024;14(10):1627-39.
9. Makki A, Rehling P. Protein transport along the presequence pathway. Biological
chemistry. 2023;404(8-9):807-12.
10. Schulz C, Schendzielorz A, Rehling P. Unlocking the presequence import pathway.
Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25(5):265-75.
11. Horten P, Colina-Tenorio L, Rampelt H. Biogenesis of Mitochondrial Metabolite
Carriers. Biomolecules. 2020;10(7).
12. Harsman A, Oeljeklaus S, Wenger C, Huot JL, Warscheid B, Schneider A. The non-
canonical mitochondrial inner membrane presequence translocase of trypanosomatids
contains two essential rhomboid-like proteins. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13707.
13. Singha UK, Peprah E, Williams S, Walker R, Saha L, Chaudhuri M. Characterization
of the mitochondrial inner membrane protein translocator Tim17 from Trypanosoma brucei.
Mol Biochem Parasitol 2008;159:30-43.
14. Zarsky V, Dolezal P. Evolution of the Tim17 protein family. Biol Direct. 2016;11(1):54.
15. Backes S, Herrmann JM. Protein Translocation into the Intermembrane Space and
Matrix of Mitochondria: Mechanisms and Driving Forces. Front Mol Biosci. 2017;4:83.
16. van der Laan M, Meinecke M, Dudek J, Hutu DP, Lind M, Perschil I, et al. Motor-free
mitochondrial presequence translocase drives membrane integration of preproteins. Nat Cell
Biol. 2007;9(10):1152-9.
17. Craig EA. Hsp70 at the membrane: driving protein translocation. BMC Biol.
2018;16(1):11.
18. Hauser R, Pypaert M, Häusler T, Horn EK, Schneider A. In vitro import of proteins
into mitochondria of Trypanosoma brucei and Leishmania tarentolae. J Cell Sci.
1996;109:517-23.
19. von Känel C, Muñoz-Gómez SA, Oeljeklaus S, Wenger C, Warscheid B, Wideman
JG, et al. Homologue replacement in the import motor of the mitochondrial inner membrane
of trypanosomes. eLIFE. 2020;9: e52560.
20. Tschopp F, Charriere F, Schneider A. In vivo study in Trypanosoma brucei links
mitochondrial transfer RNA import to mitochondrial protein import. EMBO Rep.
2011;12(8):825-32.
21. von Känel C, Stettler P, Esposito C, Berger S, Amodeo S, Oeljeklaus S, et al. Pam16
and Pam18 were repurposed during Trypanosoma brucei evolution to regulate the
replication of mitochondrial DNA. PLoS Biol. 2024;22(8):e3002449.
22. Rehling P, Model K, Brandner K, Kovermann P, Sickmann A, Meyer HE, et al. Protein
insertion into the mitochondrial inner membrane by a twin-pore translocase. Science.
2003;299.
23. Singha UK, Tripathi A, Smith JT, Jr., Quinones L, Saha A, Singha T, et al. Novel IM-
associated protein Tim54 plays a role in the mitochondrial import of internal signal-containing
proteins in Trypanosoma brucei. Biol Cell. 2021;113(1):39-57.
24. Schendzielorz AB, Schulz C, Lytovchenko O, Clancy A, Guiard B, Ieva R, et al. Two
distinct membrane potential-dependent steps drive mitochondrial matrix protein
translocation. J Cell Biol. 2017;216(1):83-92.
25. Quintana JF, Zoltner M, Field MC. Evolving Differentiation in African Trypanosomes.
Trends Parasitol. 2020.
26. Michels PAM, Villafraz O, Pineda E, Alencar MB, Caceres AJ, Silber AM, et al.
Carbohydrate metabolism in trypanosomatids: New insights revealing novel complexity,
diversity and species-unique features. Exp Parasitol. 2021;224:108102.
27. Zikova A. Mitochondrial adaptations throughout the Trypanosoma brucei life cycle. J
Eukaryot Microbiol. 2022;69(6):e12911.
28. Zikova A, Schnaufer A, Dalley RA, Panigrahi AK, Stuart KD. The F(0)F(1)-ATP
synthase complex contains novel subunits and is essential for procyclic Trypanosoma
brucei. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(5):e1000436.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
15
29. Haanstra JR, Gonzalez-Marcano EB, Gualdron-Lopez M, Michels PA. Biogenesis,
maintenance and dynamics of glycosomes in trypanosomatid parasites. Biochim Biophys
Acta. 2016;1863(5):1038-48.
30. Schnaufer A, Clark-Walker GD, Steinberg AG, Stuart K. The F1-ATP synthase
complex in bloodstream stage trypanosomes has an unusual and essential function.
EMBO J. 2005;24:4029-40.
31. Gahura O, Hierro-Yap C, Zikova A. Redesigned and reversed: architectural and
functional oddities of the trypanosomal ATP synthase. Parasitology. 2021;148(10):1151-60.
32. Bhat GJ, Koslowsky DJ, Feagin JE, Smiley BL, Stuart K. An extensively edited
mitochondrial transcript in kinetoplastids encodes a protein homologous to ATPase subunit
6. Cell. 1990;61(5):885-94.
33. Ramrath DJF, Niemann M, Leibundgut M, Bieri P, Prange C, Horn EK, et al.
Evolutionary shift toward protein-based architecture in trypanosomal mitochondrial
ribosomes. Science. 2018;362(6413).
34. Schnaufer A, Domingo GJ, Stuart K. Natural and induced dyskinetoplastic
trypanosomatids: how to live without mitochondrial DNA. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:1071-84.
35. Lai DH, Hashimi H, Lun ZR, Ayala FJ, Lukes J. Adaptations of Trypanosoma brucei
to gradual loss of kinetoplast DNA: Trypanosoma equiperdum and Trypanosoma evansi are
petite mutants of T. brucei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:1999-2004.
36. Dean S, Gould MK, Dewar CE, Schnaufer AC. Single point mutations in ATP
synthase compensate for mitochondrial genome loss in trypanosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 2013;110:14741-6.
37. Jensen RE, Simpson L, Englund PT. What happens when Trypanosoma brucei
leaves Africa. Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:428-31.
38. Chen XJ, Clark-Walker GD. The petite mutation in yeasts: 50 years on. Int Rev Cytol.
2000;194:197-238.
39. von Kanel C, Oeljeklaus S, Wenger C, Stettler P, Harsman A, Warscheid B, et al.
Intermembrane space-localized TbTim15 is an essential subunit of the single mitochondrial
inner membrane protein translocase of trypanosomes. Mol Microbiol. 2024;121(6):1112-26.
40. Peikert CD, Mani J, Morgenstern M, Käser S, Knapp B, Wenger C, et al. Charting
Organellar Importomes by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15272.
41. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly
accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596(7873):583-9.
42. Subrtova K, Panicucci B, Zikova A. ATPaseTb2, a unique membrane-bound FoF1-
ATPase component, is essential in bloodstream and dyskinetoplastic trypanosomes. PLoS
Pathog. 2015;11(2):e1004660.
43. Zikova A, Verner Z, Nenarokova A, Michels PAM, Lukes J. A paradigm shift: The
mitoproteomes of procyclic and bloodstream Trypanosoma brucei are comparably complex.
PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(12):e1006679.
44. Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. Locating proteins in the cell
using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(4):953-71.
45. van der Laan M, Chacinska A, Lind M, Perschil I, Sickmann A, Meyer HE, et al.
Pam17 is required for architecture and translocation activity of the mitochondrial protein
import motor. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(17):7449-58.
46. Gahura O, Subrtova K, Vachova H, Panicucci B, Fearnley IM, Harbour ME, et al. The
F(1) -ATPase from Trypanosoma brucei is elaborated by three copies of an additional p18-
subunit. FEBS J. 2018;285(3):614-28.
47. Wirtz E, Leal S, Ochatt C, Cross GA. A tightly regulated inducible expression system
for conditional gene knock-outs and dominant-negative genetics in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol
Biochem Parasitol. 1999;99:89-101.
48. Brun R, Schönenberger M. Cultivation an in vitro cloning of procyclic culture forms of
Trypansoma brucei in a semi-defined medium. Acta Trop. 1979;36:289-92.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
16
49. Hirumi H, Hirumi K. Continuous cultivation of Trypanosoma brucei blood stream
forms in a medium containing a low concentration of serum protein without feeder cell layers.
J Parasitol. 1989;75(6):985-9.
50. Oberholzer M, Morand S, Kunz S, Seebeck T. A vector series for rapid PCR-
mediated C-terminal in situ tagging of Trypanosoma brucei genes. Mol Biochem Parasitol.
2006;145:117-20.
51. Mani J, Desy S, Niemann M, Chanfon A, Oeljeklaus S, Pusnik M, et al. Mitochondrial
protein import receptors in Kinetoplastids reveal convergent evolution over large
phylogenetic distances. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6646.
52. Panigrahi AK, Zikova A, Dalley RA, Acestor N, Ogata Y, Anupama A, et al.
Mitochondrial complexes in Trypanosoma brucei: a novel complex and a unique
oxidoreductase complex. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7(3):534-45.
53. Wenger C, Harsman A, Niemann M, Oeljeklaus S, von Kanel C, Calderaro S, et al.
The Mba1 homologue of Trypanosoma brucei is involved in the biogenesis of oxidative
phosphorylation complexes. Mol Microbiol. 2023;119(5):537-50.
54. Chomczyinski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium
thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:156-9.
55. Lamour N, Riviere L, Coustou V, Coombs GH, Barrett MP, Bringaud F. Proline
metabolism in procyclic Trypanosoma brucei is down-regulated in the presence of glucose. J
Biol Chem. 2005;280:11902-10.
56. Dewar CE, Oeljeklaus S, Wenger C, Warscheid B, Schneider A. Characterisation of a
highly diverged mitochondrial ATP synthase Fo subunit in Trypanosoma brucei. J Biol Chem.
2022:101829.
57. Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized
p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol.
2008;26:1367–72.
58. Cox J, Neuhauser N, Michalski A, Scheltema RA, Olsen JV, Mann M. Andromeda: A
Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment. J Proteome Res.
2011;10:1794-805.
59. Breitling R, Herzyk P. Rank-based methods as a non-parametric alternative of the T-
statistic for the analysis of biological microarray data. J Bioinform Comput Biol.
2005;3(5):1171-89.
60. Del Carratore F, Jankevics A, Eisinga R, Heskes T, Hong F, Breitling R. RankProd
2.0: a refactored bioconductor package for detecting differentially expressed features in
molecular profiling datasets. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(17):2774-5.
61. Huber W, von Heydebreck A, Sultmann H, Poustka A, Vingron M. Variance
stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential
expression. Bioinformatics. 2002;18 Suppl 1:S96-104.
62. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential
expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article3.
63. Schwammle V, Leon IR, Jensen ON. Assessment and improvement of statistical
tools for comparative proteomics analysis of sparse data sets with few experimental
replicates. J Proteome Res. 2013;12(9):3874-83.
64. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and
Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1995;57:289–
300.
65. Aslett M, Aurrecoechea C, Berriman M, Brestelli J, Brunk BP, Carrington M, et al.
TriTrypDB: a functional genomic resource for the Trypanosomatidae. Nucleic acids research.
2010;38(Database issue):D457-62.
66. Osorio D, Rondon-Villarreal P, Torres R. Peptides: A package for data mining of
antimicrobial peptides. The R Journal. 2015;7:4-14.
67. Deutsch EW, Bandeira N, Perez-Riverol Y, Sharma V, Carver JJ, Mendoza L, et al.
The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update. Nucleic acids research.
2023;51(D1):D1539-D48.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
17
68. Perez-Riverol Y, Bandla C, Kundu DJ, Kamatchinathan S, Bai J, Hewapathirana S, et
al. The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update. Nucleic acids research.
2025;53(D1):D543-D53.
69. Tauriello G, Waterhouse AM, Haas J, Behringer D, Bienert S, Garello T, et al.
ModelArchive: A Deposition Database for Computational Macromolecular Structural Models.
Journal of molecular biology. 2025:168996.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
18
Main Figures
Figure 1. TbTim20 is an intermembrane space-localized TIM subunit
Visualization of proteins detected in SILAC-based quantitative mass spectrometry analysis of
TbTim15-HA (A) and TbTim20-HA (B) CoIPs. Differentially labelled uninduced and induced cells
were mixed and subjected to CoIP. The vertical dotted lines indicate the specified enrichment
factors. The horizontal dotted lines indicate an adjusted P value of 0.05. The CoIP baits are
highlighted in blue and TIM and PAM components in green. For numerical data see Table S1 and
S2. (C) Left panel, immunoblot of steady-state levels of TbTim20-HA in TbErv1 RNAi background
over five days of induction. Tim9 and ATOM40 were used as markers for mitochondrial
intermembrane space and outer membrane proteins, respectively. Right panel, densitometric
quantification of immunoblot signals of TbTim20-HA and Tim9 normalized to ATOM40 of
triplicate experiments shown on left panel. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (D) Total
cells (T) expressing either C- or N-terminally HA-tagged TbTim20 (TbTim20-HA, HA-TbTim20)
were extracted with 0.015% digitonin to obtain mitochondria-enriched fractions. Treatment of
these fractions with 0.05% digitonin allowed the generation of mitoplasts. Mitochondria-
enriched fractions and mitoplasts were treated with 0.05 mg/ml proteinase K and/or 1% Triton
X100 as indicated. The resulting immunoblots were probed with anti-tag antibodies. Tim9,
TbmHsp70 and ATOM69 served as controls for mitochondrial intermembrane space, matrix,
and outer membrane proteins, respectively.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
19
Figure 2. TbTim20 is essential for normal growth of BSFs with a decreased ΔΨ
(A) Growth curve of uninduced and induced (-/+Tet) TbTim20 RNAi BSF NYsm cells. Error bars
are too small to be visible and correspond to the standard deviation (SD) (n=3). Inset shows the
RT-PCR product of the TbTim20 mRNA in uninduced or two days induced cells. RT-PCR product
of Tubulin mRNA serves as loading control. (B) Growth curves of uninduced and induced (-
/+Tet) TbTim20-RNAi γL262P cell lines containing or lacking kDNA (+/-kDNA). SDs (n=3) are
indicated. Inset on the left as in (A). The microscopy pictures of DAPI-stained cells in the
bottom panels confirm the presence or absence of kDNA in the corresponding TbTim20-RNAi
γL262P cell lines (scale bar: 5 μm). To remove the kDNA cells were grown in medium containing
10 nM ethidium bromide (EtBr) prior to tetracycline induction. (C) Alamar blue cell viability
assays to determine the FCCP sensitivity of the indicated cell lines. Means and SD (n=3) are
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
20
indicated. (D) The means and SDs of triplicate experiments showing the ratios between the
generation times of uninduced and TbTim20-depleted normal BSF cells (NYsm),
gL262P(+kDNA), and gL262P(-kDNA) cells in the presence of the indicated concentration of
FCCP are depicted. Generation times were measured between two to three days after
tetracycline-induced TbTim20 depletion. A cross indicates that only dead cells or cell debris
were observed. Means and SD (n=3) are indicated. (E, F) ΔΨ measurement in the indicated
permeabilized cell lines. A decrease in safranine O fluorescence is indicative of the formation
of the ΔΨ. For each cell line a representative trace of three independent experiments is shown.
Panels (E) and (F) depict dependence of fluorescence intensity versus time or FCCP
concentration, respectively. The right panel in (F) shows fluorescence intensity of γL262P(-
kDNA) cells with an expanded y-axis.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
21
Figure 3. TbTim20-depletion changes the mitochondrial proteome in kDNA-lacking gL262P
cells
Mitochondria-enriched fractions of uninduced and two days induced TbTim20 RNAi gL262P(-
kDNA) were analysed by quantitative proteomics. To ablate the kDNA, cells were grown in
medium containing 10 nM ethidium bromide starting three days before RNAi induction. Only
putative BSF mitochondrial proteins are depicted. The mean log2 of normalized ratios
(induced/uninduced) was plotted against the corresponding negative log10 of the adjusted P
value (limma test). TbTim20 is highlighted in blue. Left: proteins with a predicted mitochondrial
presequence are highlighted in red. Right: subunits of the ATPase and the ADP/ATP carrier are
highlighted in orange and green, respectively. The horizontal dotted lines in both the volcano
plots mark an adjusted P value of 0.05. The vertical dotted lines in both volcano plots indicate a
+/- 1.5-fold-change in protein abundance. For numerical data see Table S3.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
22
Figure 4. TbTim20 facilitates growth of PCF T. brucei in the presence of a protonophore
(A) Growth of uninduced and induced (-Tet/+Tet) PCF TbTim20 RNAi cells in standard medium.
(B) As in (A) but growth was monitored in the presence of 2.5 µM of CCCP in standard medium.
Error bars correspond to standard deviation (n=2).
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
23
Supplementary Figures
Figure S1. Mitochondrial ΔΨ generation in PCF and BSF trypanosomes
Suggested mode of ΔΨ generation in (A) PCF, (B) BSF NYsm, (C) BSF γL262P (+kDNA), and (D)
BSF γL262P (+kDNA). ADP/ATP carrier (AAC, red), kDNA-encoded subunit a of the Fo-ATPase
(yellow), wild-type and mutant g-subunits of the ATPase are shown in two shades of orange
respectively. In (C) both wild-type and mutant version of the γ-subunit are present. It is unclear
whether both versions can engage with both the coupled and uncoupled ATPase. It is not
known in (C) and (D) whether the uncoupled F1-ATPase is completely detached from the IM. It
is also unclear in (D) how much of the Fo-ATPase is present in the assembled state. IMS:
intermembrane space, IM: inner mitochondrial membrane.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
24
Figure S2. AlphaFold2 predicted structure of TbTim20
(A) Cartoon representation of the predicted monomer structure of TbTim20 from two sides.
Colors represent the predicted local Distance Difference Test (plDDT). (B) Graphical
visualization of the predicted alignment score in Angstrom of the scored residues versus the
aligned residues. The model is available in ModelArchive (69)
at https://www.modelarchive.org/doi/10.5452/ma-ow6rg.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
25
Figure S3. TbTim20 is a subunit of the TIM complex in γL262P cells
The γL262P(+kDNA) cell line expressing TbTim20-HA was subjected to a co-
immunoprecipitation (CoIP) experiment. 5% of mitochondria-enriched fractions (Input), 5% of
unbound proteins (Unbound) and 100% of the final eluates (IP) were analysed by
immunoblotting. The immunoblot was probed with an anti-HA antibody, as well as with antisera
recognizing the TIM/PAM subunits (TbTim15, TbTim17, TbPam27, Tim9) and ATOM40.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint
26
Figure S4. TbTim20-dependency not due to high N-terminal positive charges or pI. Graphs
show the effect of the protein isoelectric point (pI) (A) or the theoretical net charge of the first 20
aa (B) on the mean log2 normalized ratio (induced/uninduced) of proteins with a predicted
presequence (PS) (n=94). Pearson’s r: Pearson correlation coefficient; R2: Coefficient of
determination for linear model. Solid lines show a linear regression line, dashed lines indicate
the 90% confidence intervals of the linear regression. The values for the theoretical net charge
of the first 20 aa in (B) were randomly scattered by maximal 0.4 units along the y-axis for better
datapoint discrimination.
.CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 27, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.25.650624doi: bioRxiv preprint