A comparative analysis of urinary microbiome identifies putative probiotics

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,785 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most prevalent bacterial infections globally, and their management increasingly challenged by antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Probiotics offer a promising approach to mitigate AMR by competitively excluding uropathogens and enhancing host immunity by producing immune modulators. Despite being potential, key gaps persist between the discovery of uroprotective probiotic strains and optimization of formulations for urinary tract delivery. Here, we analyzed the urinary microbiome of UTI patients and healthy individuals to identify potential probiotic candidates for the prevention and management of UTIs. Publicly available 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data of the urinary tract were processed using a standardized pipeline for sequence quality assessment, taxonomic assignment, and microbial function prediction. Comparative analysis showed a significant shift in microbial composition between UTI patients and healthy controls. The dominated phyla identified included Acidobacteriota, Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Campylobacterota, Cyanobacteria, Firmicutes, Fusobacteriota, Patescibacteria, Proteobacteria, and Synergistota. Overall differential abundance analysis revealed Escherichia coli as the predominant UTI-associated species, while Lactobacillus crispatus was enriched in healthy samples. Additionally, predictive functional analysis indicated that metabolic pathways associated with beneficial microbes were enriched in the healthy group. Overall, the study highlights the association of distinct urinary microbiome signatures with infection status, which supports L. crispatus as the most promising probiotic for UTI prevention and control. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00