Laparoscopic versus Laparotomic Surgery for Endometriosis: Fertility and Recurrence in a Retrospective Cohort

Fan
dataset OA: green CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-09

This retrospective study compared laparoscopic and laparotomic surgery for endometriosis, finding laparoscopic surgery was associated with faster recovery and higher unadjusted pregnancy rates, though adjusted analyses for pregnancy and recurrence did not reach statistical significance.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-09 · read from full text

This retrospective cohort study compared laparoscopic surgery (LS) versus laparotomic surgery (LT) in 219 patients with pathologically confirmed endometriosis treated between 2020 and 2024, assessing fertility and composite recurrence within a 12-month postoperative window. LS was associated with faster perioperative recovery and higher unadjusted spontaneous clinical pregnancy rates, but the adjusted odds of achieving any clinical pregnancy within 12 months were not statistically significant (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.80–2.53), while composite recurrence was numerically lower after LS without statistical significance (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39–1.03; P=0.061). The authors note that comprehensive patient-level, subtype-specific analyses were not performed, limiting interpretation across heterogeneous endometriosis phenotypes and making phenotype-specific observations exploratory. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it directly compares laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgical approaches with outcomes for fertility and postoperative recurrence in endometriosis patients.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is frequently associated with infertility and postoperative recurrence, and fertility-sparing surgery may be considered when symptoms, endometriomas, adhesions, or deep infiltrating disease are unlikely to be adequately managed with medical therapy or assisted reproduction alone. Because the choice of laparoscopic surgery (LS) or laparotomic surgery (LT) is strongly influenced by lesion phenotype and disease burden, pooled surgical comparisons are vulnerable to confounding. This retrospective cohort study evaluated 219 surgically treated patients with pathologically confirmed endometriosis who underwent LS (n = 150) or LT (n = 69) between January 2020 and December 2024. Outcomes were assessed within a 12-month postoperative window. Because comprehensive patient-level subtype-specific analyses were not performed, findings should be interpreted cautiously across heterogeneous endometriosis phenotypes, and any phenotype-specific observations are exploratory. LS was associated with faster perioperative recovery and a higher unadjusted spontaneous clinical pregnancy rate (37.3% versus 23.2%; 42.4% versus 27.1% among patients attempting conception). However, the adjusted odds ratio for any clinical pregnancy within 12 months was not statistically significant (OR = 1.42, 95% CI, 0.80–2.53). Composite recurrence was numerically lower after LS (18.0% versus 29.0%), but the adjusted estimate did not reach statistical significance (HR = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.39–1.03; P = 0.061). These findings support cautious, individualized interpretation in surgically selected patients and should not be interpreted as evidence that LS is superior across all endometriosis phenotypes or all patients with infertility.
Full text 1,995 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Laparoscopic versus Laparotomic Surgery for Endometriosis: Fertility and Recurrence in a Retrospective Cohort Authors/Creators Description Endometriosis is frequently associated with infertility and postoperative recurrence, and fertility-sparing surgery may be considered when symptoms, endometriomas, adhesions, or deep infiltrating disease are unlikely to be adequately managed with medical therapy or assisted reproduction alone. Because the choice of laparoscopic surgery (LS) or laparotomic surgery (LT) is strongly influenced by lesion phenotype and disease burden, pooled surgical comparisons are vulnerable to confounding. This retrospective cohort study evaluated 219 surgically treated patients with pathologically confirmed endometriosis who underwent LS (n = 150) or LT (n = 69) between January 2020 and December 2024. Outcomes were assessed within a 12-month postoperative window. Because comprehensive patient-level subtype-specific analyses were not performed, findings should be interpreted cautiously across heterogeneous endometriosis phenotypes, and any phenotype-specific observations are exploratory. LS was associated with faster perioperative recovery and a higher unadjusted spontaneous clinical pregnancy rate (37.3% versus 23.2%; 42.4% versus 27.1% among patients attempting conception). However, the adjusted odds ratio for any clinical pregnancy within 12 months was not statistically significant (OR = 1.42, 95% CI, 0.80–2.53). Composite recurrence was numerically lower after LS (18.0% versus 29.0%), but the adjusted estimate did not reach statistical significance (HR = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.39–1.03; P = 0.061). These findings support cautious, individualized interpretation in surgically selected patients and should not be interpreted as evidence that LS is superior across all endometriosis phenotypes or all patients with infertility. Files Files (93.0 kB) | Name | Size | Download all | |---|---|---| | md5:031435d649bc2337052824b837947cff | 93.0 kB | Download |

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-09-08T06:07:36.077809+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK