Insecticide alters the evolution of glyphosate resistance in Ipomoea purpurea

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The study examined how exposure to an insecticide affects the evolution of glyphosate resistance in the plant Ipomoea purpurea using a factorial field experiment that manipulated glyphosate and insecticide presence. Glyphosate was found to be the primary selective agent, with higher glyphosate resistance favored under glyphosate exposure, and in the presence of glyphosate alone, positive correlational selection favored plants with a combination of higher glyphosate and herbivory resistance. Insecticide exposure increased glyphoslate resistance but weakened the strength of selection on the resistance trait, indicating that secondary stressors can reshape evolutionary trajectories. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ABSTRACT The evolution of plant resistance naturally occurs in complex, multifaceted environments that consist of multiple simultaneous stressors. Understanding how shifting environmental contexts may shape resistance evolution requires empirical studies that consider the combined effects of interacting stressors on fitness and selection. Here, we examined how exposure to an insecticide impacts the evolution of resistance to the herbicide glyphosate in Ipomoea purpurea (common morning glory). Through a factorial field experiment, we manipulated glyphosate and an insecticide to estimate selection on glyphosate and herbivory resistance. We found that glyphosate acted as the primary agent of selection, favoring higher levels of glyphosate resistance. In the presence of glyphosate alone, positive correlational selection favored a combination of higher glyphosate and herbivory resistance, supporting prior work that suggested these traits may be linked. Importantly, insecticide exposure modified both glyphosate resistance and the strength of selection acting upon the trait by increasing resistance and weakening selection. Together, our results indicate that the evolution of herbicide resistance is context-dependent and that secondary stressors like insecticide can alter the evolutionary trajectories of plant defense.
Full text 1,537 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT The evolution of plant resistance naturally occurs in complex, multifaceted environments that consist of multiple simultaneous stressors. Understanding how shifting environmental contexts may shape resistance evolution requires empirical studies that consider the combined effects of interacting stressors on fitness and selection. Here, we examined how exposure to an insecticide impacts the evolution of resistance to the herbicide glyphosate in Ipomoea purpurea (common morning glory). Through a factorial field experiment, we manipulated glyphosate and an insecticide to estimate selection on glyphosate and herbivory resistance. We found that glyphosate acted as the primary agent of selection, favoring higher levels of glyphosate resistance. In the presence of glyphosate alone, positive correlational selection favored a combination of higher glyphosate and herbivory resistance, supporting prior work that suggested these traits may be linked. Importantly, insecticide exposure modified both glyphosate resistance and the strength of selection acting upon the trait by increasing resistance and weakening selection. Together, our results indicate that the evolution of herbicide resistance is context-dependent and that secondary stressors like insecticide can alter the evolutionary trajectories of plant defense. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes The manuscript has been substantially reframed and rewritten, although most methods and results remain very similar.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00