Abstract
Background: Abdominal wall endometriomas are quite uncommon. Awareness of the details of this rare
condition is therefore essential for prompt diagnosis and adequate treatment.
Introduction
Endometriosis though a condition commonly seen in the pelvic region can also occur at
extra-pelvic sites giving rise to a diagnostic dilemma.
Case Report: A case of abdominal wall endometrioma diagnosed clinically and treated by wide surgical
resection is presented to highlight the importance of clinical evaluation in the diagnosis of this condition.
Discussion
The presentation, investigations, and management are discussed briefly.
Conclusion
Clinical evaluation confirmed by supportive imaging is diagnostic.
Keywords
endometrioma, chocolate cyst, abdominal wall
Introduction
Endometriosis, first described by German pathologist Carl von Rokitansky as cystosarcoma
adenoids uterin um, defined as an estrogen -dependent condition in which ectopic endometrial
glands and stroma are found outside the uterus. Most endometrial deposits are found in the
pelvis (ovaries, peritoneum, uterosacral ligaments, pouch of Douglas, and rectovaginal se ptum)
[1]. The incidence of endometriosis is reported as 4%– 17% of all women during their
reproductive age. The ovary is variously reported to be involved in 17% to 44% of
endometriosis patients
[2]. Classical studies suggested that 30% to 50% of women wit h
endometriosis are infertile [3]. The endometrial implants may be categorized as cyst comtic,
mixed or solid, with the cystic implants being most common. Although, in some cases
endometrial implants may occur spontaneously. Endometriosis can be intra or e xtra pelvic in
location. Most cases are intra pelvic, usually involving ovary, pouch of Douglas, pelvic
peritoneum, uterosacral ligament, urinary bladder, rectum, broad and round ligament.
The presence of endometrium outside the uterine cavity can be expla ined by many theories; the
mechanism most widely accepted is that of retrograde menstruation
[4]. Other authors believe
that it is a result of celomic metaplasia [5]. The structure most frequently affected by
endometriosis is the ovary, but involvement of the fallopian tubes, pelvic serosa, rectum,
retroperitoneal structures, and lungs has also been described. Endometriotic cysts typically
contain old blood and are also referred to as chocolate cysts or endometriomas [6]. Generally,
endometriomas are diagno sed by ultrasonograpic examination, but sometimes it is difficult to
make a differential diagnosis preoperatively.
Case report
A 30 -year-old, 105 kg in weight, 1.75 cm in height, para 0 woman had been referred to our
hospital with a pelvic mass. Married life of 13 yrs with the history of 1st baby 7 yrs back/missed
abortion / 3 months of pregnancy and 2 nd baby 5 yrs back/ 3 months pregnancy /missed
abortion / followed by suction and evacuation). She was suffering from secondary infertility
since 4 yrs and complain of hypomenorrhoea associated with severe pain before and after
menses. On day of admission a lump of 7*8 cm in right iliac fossa, tender+ +, restricted mobility
from side to side. In Per speculum examination no abnormality detected and Per -vaginal pap
smear taken. Uterus anteverted, bulky, firm, mobile, non-tender, In right fornix a mass of 7*8
cm felt, tender, lower limit reachable and Left fornix free, non-tender. In pelvis ultrasonographic
examination a large cystic lesion of size 5.3*8.6*10 cm w ith internal echoes on right sided
adnexa, a cystic lesion with internal reticular pattern of size 2*3*2 cm in left adnexa and
Bicornuate / septate uterus large ovarian chocolate cyst.
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology http://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 98 ~
In transvaginal ultrasonographic examination, there was a
bilaterally cystic mass that is 10 × 8 cm in right adnexa and 2× 3
cm i n left adnexa. Hysterosalpingogram (HSG) test were as
follows Left sided hydrosalpinx with no free spillage suggestive
of left fallopian tube blockage and right sided fallopian tube
patent. Acid F ast Bacilli were not seen in the histologic
examination of endometrial biopsy by zn stain and Bact.
Decision for excision of endometriomas was taken, Abdominal
cystectomy was performed under general anesthesia, and was
successfully performed (fig.1) Cut se ction of the cysts revealed
chocolate coloured fluid (fig 2), and histopathological
examination confirmed the diagnosis of ovarian endometriosis.
Postoperative recovery was unremarkable.
Fig 1: cystic mass removal
Fig 2: cysts revealed chocolate coloured fluid
Discussion
The presence of endometrial glandular and stromal tissue
outside the uterus is called endometriosis. It is seen in women of
active reproductive age. The common sites for endometriosis are
the ovaries, pelvis, lower intestinal tract which includes the
sigmoid colon, and urinary system especially the bladder.
Endometriosis is classified into 4 stages based on the severity,
amount, location, depth, and size of growths: stage I (minimal),
stage II (mild), stage III (moderate), and stage IV (severe) [7].
Endometriosis is a relatively common gynaecological condition
affecting 6-10% of women in the reproductive age group. It is
the presence of functional endometrial glands and stroma
outside the uterine cavity and is usually characterized by chronic
pelvic pain and infertility. Risk factors for endometriosis include
nulliparity, previous pelvic surgeries, imperforate hymen,
cervical stenosis and gynaetresia. Several theories have been
proposed to explain the pathogenesis of the condition wit h the
most popular theory being the retrograde menstruation. Others
are the theory of coelomic metaplasia, immunologic theory,
mullerianosis and transplantation theory. Another presentation
of endometriosis is as a pelvic mass with the formation of an
endometrioma.
Endometriomas, commonly referred to as “chocolate cysts” are a
common presentation of endometriosis seen in about 17 –44% of
endometriosis and refers to cysts on the ovaries associated with
ectopic endometrial tissue and containing degraded hemorr hagic
content hence the appearance of a chocolate -coloured effluent
when ruptured. It is thought that endometriomas form from
deposition of endometriotic deposits with subsequent
invagination of the underlying ovarian cortex. Although
majority of chocolate cysts arise from the ovaries, a significant
proportion have been found in other sites including the
peritoneum overlying the anterior and posterior cul de sac,
within the broad ligament and inguinal canal as well as uterine
serosa. In addition, these cyst s could be bilateral and are usually
small to medium in size. However, a few have been reported to
grow to very large sizes 8. As in our case report presents an
atypical presentation of chocolate cyst be bil ateral small to
medium in size.
Interestingly, al though the abdomino- pelvic ultrasound scan
reported that the mass was extra-ovarian which was confirmed at
surgery, the abdominal CT scan erroneously reported the organ
of origin as the ovary. Radiological features noted in this patient
which were in keepi ng with those found in endometriosis
include the fact that it was bilaterally unilocular containing
internal echoes though not the classical “ground -glass”
appearance seen in endometrioma.
The differential diagnosis may include a variety of conditions
such as hernia, lipoma, desmoid tumour, or primary or
metastatic malignancy. Therefore a careful history with proper
interpretation of radiological findings can help in making a
correct preoperative diagnosis.
Conclusion
Extra- ovarian chocolate cysts can grow to huge sizes presenting
diagnostic dilemma. Transvaginal ultrasound scan is still a very
viable means of evaluating gynaecological patients and should
not be totally replaced by more advanced radiological
techniques such as CT scan and MRI. The pres ence of
endometriomas or chocolate cysts does not always indicate
severe pelvic disease. Hence, extra ovarian endometrioma
should be entertained as a possible differential diagnosis in the
evaluation of abdominopelvic masses.
Conflict of Interests
The author hereby declare that they do not have any conflict of
interests.
References
1. Ganesh AL , Chakravarty B . Spontaneous viable
pregnancies in cervical and rectal endometriosis: a report of
two cases, Fertility and Sterility 2007;87(3):697.e1-697.e4.
2. Ueda Y, Enomoto T, Miyatake T et al . A retrospective
analysis of ovarian endometriosis during pregnancy,
Fertility and Sterility 2010;94(1):78-84.
3. Endometriosis and Infertility: a Committee Opinion, t he
practice committee of the American Society for
Reproductive Medicine Birmingham, Alabama, Fertil Steril
2010;98(3):591-598.
4. Halme J, Hammond MG, Hulka JF et al . Retrograde
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology http://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 99 ~
menstruation in healthy women and in patients with
endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64:151-4.
5. Bulun SE. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 2009;360:268-79.
6. Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG. Evidence -based management of
endometrioma. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23:15-24.
7. Olive DL. Endometriosis in Clinical Practice. London a nd
New York: Taylor and Francis 2005.
8. Keyhan S, Hughes C, Price T, Muasher S. An Update on
Surgical versus Expectant Management of Ovarian
Endometriomas in Infertile Women. Biomed Res Int
2015;2015:204792.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.