Climate Change in the Western Balkans and Eu Green Deal – Coherence, Challenges, and Perspective

Climate Change in the Western Balkans and Eu Green Deal – Coherence, Challenges, and Perspective | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Original article Climate Change in the Western Balkans and Eu Green Deal – Coherence, Challenges, and Perspective Sandi Knez, Snežana Štrbac, Iztok Podbregar This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-829240/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 5 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: The European Commission (EC), based on the European Green Deal (2019) and the Recovery plan for Europe (2021) envisages investing 30% of the budget in climate-related programs, projects, and initiatives, which clearly shows Europe's commitment to becoming the first climate-neutral region by 2050. Activities are also planned for countries that are not members of the European Union (EU), which requires complex changes in the field of legislation, strategic planning, implementation, and monitoring. To successfully plan short-term and long-term activities on these grounds, it is necessary to have a realistic picture of the state of climate change in each country - as they spill over into the entire region of Europe. The main objective of this paper is to present the state of climate change in six Western Balkans countries, of which only Croatia is a member of the EU, for the needs of planning activities and initial harmonization with the EU plan to reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by 2050. Results: The main results of the research show that in all countries of the region, the average annual temperature increased by 1.2 °C compared to 1970, with stabilization and the beginning of the decline which can be expected around 2040. The main reasons for climate change in the region are: industry, energy, and heating sector based on coal exploitation, low energy efficiency, etc. Conclusions: It can be concluded that all countries of the Western Balkans have adopted (or are in the process of adopting) the necessary regulations and strategies towards climate change mitigation, but the implementation of specific activities is at a low level. The reasons for this most often lies in the insufficient commitment of decision-makers to make significant changes in the field of climate change transition (lower level of economic development, lack of investment, preservation of social peace). Finally, the paper provides an overview of climate change by country, scenario analysis, and policy recommendations. Energy Engineering Renewable Resources Climate Change Western Balkans European Union European Green Deal Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Background The atmosphere is warming and the climate is changing every year. One million of the eight million species on the planet risk being lost. Forests and oceans are polluted and destroyed ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ). Over the last 20 years, governments have intensified their consideration of the threats posed by climate change, by gradually implementing strategic action measures to combat such change, and in parallel, by advancing scientific knowledge on climate change. So far, the global policy response has mainly focused on mitigating climate change by reducing anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG). The European Commission (EC) officially adopted the European Union (EU) strategy on adaptation to climate change in 2021. The new strategy sets out how the EU can adapt to the unavoidable impacts of climate change and become climate resilient by 2050. In addition to the Strategy, European Green Deal (2019) is also a response to these challenges ( 5 ). The European Green Deal is part of the strategy of the EC for the implementation of the United Nation’s 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) ( 6 ) and aims to transform the EU into a prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient, and competitive economy, which has no net GHG emissions in 2050 and where economic growth is separate from resource use. It also aims to protect, preserve and enhance the EU's natural capital and to protect the citizen's health and well-being from the risks and impacts associated with changes in the environment. The EU must lead the coordination of international efforts to build a coherent financial system that supports sustainable solutions. The EU and its member states have become broadly committed to adaptation and have begun to address these challenges by establishing adaptation strategies at all levels. The most important of these are the national energy and climate plans and the proposed strategic national plans for the implementation of the common agricultural policy. Member states must also ensure that policies and laws are effectively enforced. The Commission has proposed a new (8th) Environmental Action Program - supporting the European Green Deal and includes new monitoring mechanisms to ensure that Europe stays on track to meet its environmental goals. The EC has encouraged all member states to develop adaptation strategies in line with national risk reduction plans, including cross-border issues. It also supports the efforts of European cities to prepare local adaptation strategies and plans. Which aims to increase support for local activities, provide a platform for greater engagement and networking of municipalities and raise public awareness of adaptation. To address the adjustment of the most vulnerable sectors, the EC continues to integrate adaptation into EU policies. The EC also seeks to improve the resilience of infrastructure to climate change in Europe through a review of existing standards in the fields of energy, transport, and construction. As climate change and biodiversity loss are not limited by national borders, the environmental ambition of the European Green Deal Europa will not achieve by acting alone. The EU must use its influence, expertise, and financial resources to mobilize its neighbors to join it on a sustainable path. Although the transferability of adaptation knowledge in European and neighboring countries is considered key to facilitating countries in the early stages of adaptation planning to quickly and efficiently develop and finalize the policy process and implement concrete measures, contextual dependence may affect actual transferability. From that aspect, the Western Balkans is a particularly interesting area for the EU. The Western Balkans can play an important role in maximizing the impact of the European Green Deal. The main objective of this paper is to present the state of climate change in six Western Balkans countries, of which only Croatia is a member of the EU, for the needs of planning activities and initial harmonization with the EU plan to reaching net-zero GHG emissions (GHG) by 2050. Most countries of the Western Balkans (Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Croatia) spent the 1990s affected by the conflict over the break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, which delayed economic transition and resulted in significantly lower living standards than EU countries ( 7 ). The Western Balkans is a term used by the European Union for a region that includes Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia, and Albania (Fig. 1). Today, the countries of the Western Balkans are at a turning point in the development of their societies, economy, and environment. The main goals of the countries in the region are EU integration and EU accession, with Croatia becoming a member in 2013 ( 7 ). As potential candidates and candidates for EU accession, all countries are motivated to respect the Paris Agreement and achieve the EU2020 and EU2030 goals of increasing energy efficiency, reducing GHG emissions, and producing energy from renewable sources. The EU integration will have a strong impact on climate and environmental policies, laws, and actions in the coming decades ( 8 ). Methods In this paper, the data were obtained through a desk research of the secondary literature: relevant publications, articles, documents, and relevant state documents of the Western Balkan countries. All data are not updated which particular attention should be noted. Results Climate change in the Western Balkans In proportion to the size of its geographical area, the Balkan countries are characterized by a different climate. Albania has a Mediterranean climate with humid, mild winters and dry, warm summers, as well as the southern part of Montenegro and the coastal and lowland areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In the remaining areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the climate ranges from moderately continental to alpine. The central and northern parts of Montenegro have the characteristics of a mountain climate, the far north of Montenegro has a continental climate, but with the influences of the Mediterranean Sea on temperature and precipitation. Most of Croatia has a rainy-moderately warm climate. The climate in North Macedonia varies from sub-Mediterranean to moderately continental/sub-Mediterranean to continental and from cold-continental to alpine sub-climate. Serbia's climate varies in most areas from moderately continental to continental in the mountains to Mediterranean subtropical and continental in the southwest ( 9 ). To assess the impact of global warming on climate change across the Western Balkans region, two meteorological parameters were selected: temperature and precipitation. Temperature Temperatures in the region have risen in the last fifty years and every country has experienced warming with the acceleration of this trend in recent decades ( 10 ). The average temperature increased by 1.2°C. The temperature increases from south to north. Through central and southern Albania and North Macedonia, changes are in the interval of 0.5°C to 1.0°C, and over northern Albania and other Western Balkan countries in the interval 1.0-1.5°C. The average ten-year trend has a similar spatial distribution of change intensity, with values of 0.15°C to 0.2°C, declining to the south, and mostly increasing in the central part of the region ( 8 ). Temperature changes can be analyzed seasonally in winter (December-January-February), spring (March-April-May), summer (June-July-August), and autumn (September-October-November). Undoubtedly, the highest increase in temperature is during the summer season ( 8 ). Summer is the season for which scenarios and trends with the highest temperature increases are predicted ( 11 ). The frequency of extreme temperatures (heat waves) has also increased across the region ( 7 ). According to the Two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP), two future climate change scenarios are foreseen for the Western Balkans region: RCP4.5 (stabilization scenario, with the peak of GHG emissions around 2040, and their decline thereafter) and RCP8.5 (a scenario of continuous increase, where GHG concentrations continue to rise until the end of the century) (Fig. 2). According to the RCP4.5 scenario, the expected temperature changes over the near future (2016–2035) are with an average increase of 0.8°C, and according to the RCP8.5 scenario, temperature changes are significant with an average regional increase of 1.0°C. The expected temperature changes according to the RCP4.5 scenario during the end of the century (2081–2100) are that the temperature increase shows stabilization with an average increase of 2.0°C, and according to the RCP8.5 scenario, the temperature will continue to rise significantly, reaching an average value of 4.4°C. During the end of the century (2081–2100) according to the RCP4.5 scenario, the temperature stabilizes, and according to the RCP8.5, frost days (over 50 days) are expected to decrease in the entire region ( 8 ). The medium-emission scenario predicts that the eastern Mediterranean will be warmer by the end of the twenty-first century of 3.5–7°C, with the largest daily increase recorded in the Western Balkans ( 12 ). Based on the high emission scenario, a warm-up of 5–8°C will be in the eastern Mediterranean in summer ( 13 ). Among the existing models, the consensus is that during the twenty-first century, the Western Balkans will experience significant warming ( 7 ), which will be higher than the world average ( 14 ). Precipitation In the last fifty years, changes in precipitation have not been as clear as changes in temperature. Due to the complex topography of the mountains, generalizing the observed climate trends is difficult, especially since the Western Balkans have two climatic areas - continental/Mediterranean and alpine ( 7 ). The average annual accumulation of precipitation in the Western Balkans region did not change compared to the period from 1961 to 1980. The current change in precipitation is 0.2%. During the 1980s and 1990s, the amount of precipitation decreased, only to then begin to increase and return to values from the period defined as the past climate (1961–1980). This is the reason for the small change of 0.2% ( 8 ). The Western Balkans will witness a significant reduction in annual rainfall. Two scenarios, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, can also be chosen for future precipitation predictions (Fig. 3). According to the scenario RCP4.5 during the near future period (2016–2035) compared to the base period (1986–2005), the amount of precipitation will not have significant expected changes in either annual or seasonal values, the mean annual change will be within the interval − 5% and + 5%. According to the RCP8.5 scenario, the change in precipitation shows a similar trend as in the RCP4.5 scenario, but with a slightly different distribution. During the middle ages (2046–2065) according to scenario RCP4.5, the expected changes in precipitation will not show statistically significant changes in average annual and seasonal values, and according to scenario RCP8.5, the decrease in precipitation will be significant in Albania and part of Montenegro during June-July-August. During the end of the century (2081–2100) according to the RCP4.5 scenario, the expected changes in the amount of precipitation will be stabilized, and according to the RCP8.5 scenario, a serious decrease in the amount of precipitation will be during the June-July-August season in southern Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Albania and North Macedonia ( 8 ). In high-emission scenarios, the expected decrease in precipitation is more pronounced and is especially pronounced in summer ( 13 ). In winter, on the contrary, the amount of precipitation will increase in the mountains and the region in general (15; 16). Extreme rainfall is not expected in the region, however, floods are predicted to become more frequent due to more winter rainfall which will cause spring floods ( 17 ). GHG emissions and mitigation From 1990 to 2018, CO 2 emissions for the Western Balkans ranged from 1 to just over 8 metric tons per capita (Fig. 4). Annual emissions per capita are slightly more than half of the emissions for EU countries, and slightly more than a quarter compared to the United States (Fig. 5) ( 9 ). The largest discrepancy is evident in the data on total emissions. Compared to China, the US, and the EU, emissions from the Western Balkans are barely registered (Fig. 5) ( 9 ). From 1990 to 2018, total GHG emissions (kt of CO 2 equivalent) for the Western Balkans are presented in Fig. 6. Greenhouse gas emissions in Albania between 1990 and 2000, associated with changes in land use and forestry, declined significantly, while emissions in all other sectors increased. Total emissions related to land-use change and forestry accounted for 45% of total emissions. The increase in emissions in the energy sector combined with the decrease in emissions related to changes in land use and forestry has resulted in the energy sector having the largest share in total emissions in Albania. The waste sector shows the largest percentage increase, but in absolute terms, waste emissions have increased less than in any other sector ( 9 ). Data on GHG emissions for Bosnia and Herzegovina for individual sectors are only available for one year, so trend analysis is not possible ( 9 ). In Croatia, in the period from 1990 to 2007, the energy sector accounted for 70% of total GHG emissions. During that period, emissions in the waste, transport, and energy sectors also increased, while in the agricultural and industrial processes sectors, emissions decreased. Thanks to changes in land use and forestry, the absorption of GHG emissions has increased, which have further reduced total emissions ( 9 ). In North Macedonia between 1990 and 2002, the reduction in emissions related to land-use change and forestry seems impressive, but this sector accounts for only 2% of total emissions. In 2002, the energy sector accounted for the largest share of 70%. In that period, total GHG emissions fell by 8%, which can be mainly attributed to the reduction of emissions from the agricultural sector ( 9 ). In Montenegro, total GHG emissions decreased by 2% between 1990 and 2003, with changes in land use and forestry making the largest contribution. However, in 2003, the sector accounted for only 17% of total emissions. Although emissions from the energy sector increased slightly during this period, the share of total emissions attributed to the energy sector increased slightly from 51 to 54% ( 9 ). Between 1990 and 1998, GHG emissions in Serbia decreased by 22%, with most coming from the energy sector (79%). Emissions related to land-use change in both the forestry and waste sectors have experienced a significant percentage change, but these sectors represent a small percentage of total emissions ( 9 ). Discussion Vulnerability of individual sectors to climate change In terms of the amount of water available per person, the countries of the Western Balkans are the richest in water in Europe (10,600 cubic meters, which is twice the European average) (18). Most of this water comes from mountain springs, and some countries receive a significant share of their water from other countries across transboundary rivers. Water resources have always played an important role in the economies of the Western Balkans. Agriculture is largely dependent on water, where disturbances in the precipitation regime and a higher risk of drought and extreme weather conditions have significant implications for the stability of this sector. Water resources are also used to produce electricity. On average, about 37% of electricity produced comes from hydropower, although it is much higher in Albania (100%), Croatia (42%), and Montenegro (45.3%). Hydropower is affected by accelerated evaporation and drought, as well as changes in the time and volume of water flow. More frequent extreme events, such as floods, can also threaten energy infrastructure. In terms of water resources, the region faces several common problems, including weak transboundary cooperation and water pollution. After the break-up of the former Yugoslavia, there are more than 13 internationally common basins and four cross-border lakes. Most states share one or more basins. However, cross-border cooperation is generally weak, with low political priorities, insufficient institutional capacity, poor information exchange and joint monitoring, and in some cases conflicts that are some of the main factors (19). Water quality is also a cause for serious concern. Wastewater discharges are a major source of pollution for both surface and groundwater, and wastewater treatment is often poor or absent (20). In many areas of the Western Balkans, groundwater sources are at risk of agricultural runoff pollution - the biggest impact of nitrogen pollution (18). Climate change poses additional challenges in terms of water availability, quality and management. Climate change will exacerbate existing pressures on water resources and pose significant risks to sectors where water is a limiting factor. Almost all climate projections agree that countries in the region will experience a significant drop in rainfall in the twenty-first century, followed by increasing drought conditions and thus declining water availability (21). Higher temperatures will also move the snow line. By 2050, the snow cover is expected to decrease (22). Intense precipitation and increased snowmelt during the winter will increase the risk of floods across the region (14). Land quality has widespread implications not only for agriculture but also for land production capacity, and the risk of land degradation is likely to increase with climate change. Rising temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, floods and droughts directly affect soil properties and processes, which can lead to accelerated erosion, soil degradation, and desertification (23). When drought is followed by periods of intense rain on steep, unstable terrain, the land is unable to absorb large amounts of water, resulting in the excessive runoff, landslides, and floods. Fires and overexploitation of resources can further contribute to desertification. All countries in the region have extremely diverse natural potential for agricultural production, from fertile plains and river valleys to less productive karst, hilly and mountainous areas. The agricultural sector in the region generates an average of 11% of gross domestic product (GDP) (24). Eighteen percent of the population is employed in agriculture (25), which is often an economic and development driver for rural areas, where the share of employees in agriculture is much higher than the national average. Agriculture is a sector that can be considered the most vulnerable to climate change. Droughts in the Balkans have been identified as a key risk for agricultural production (26). Future projections of climate change and their impact on agriculture at the European level indicate that there will be more losses in the southern areas, including the Balkans. Key risks include reduced and increased yield variability, as well as reduced areas suitable for growing traditional crops (27). The negative effects of climate change on yields could be reduced if adaptation options were applied, but this would require 40% more water (28). Some alpine-mountainous regions, which today are characterized by lower average temperatures and shorter growing seasons than lowland areas, may benefit. For example, wheat yields in alpine areas are projected to increase significantly (29). The livestock sector is currently underrepresented in climate impact research in the region and there are only a few modeling studies (14). Forests cover a large part of the land area of the Western Balkans (25) and play a significant economic and social role in all countries, both in terms of national economies and in terms of livelihoods. The wood industry significantly contributes to the development of local economies. In some countries, the contribution of forestry to GDP is high, such as in Montenegro (8%), while in other countries it ranges between 0.5 and 2.5% (30). Forests also provide several ecosystem services, including maintaining biodiversity, mitigating and adapting to the effects of climate change, and regulating soil and water regimes. The mountainous areas of the Western Balkans covered with forests are very rich in biodiversity, both in terms of flora and fauna, whether of global or European importance for conservation (7). There are vast areas of still preserved, natural, and semi-natural ecosystems that benefit both nature and humans through ecosystem services on which most local communities still depend heavily. Rainforest relics still exist in remote areas, mountains, and swamps, representing the last refuge of these forests in Europe (31). The reduction of the rural population and migration from rural to urban areas, especially from mountainous areas, has resulted in fewer and fewer young people engaging in forestry and exerting less pressure on cutting firewood for households. However, there are still concerns in the region about the quality of forests due to inadequate management of state-owned and privately owned forests (30), while factors such as illegal logging and corruption hinder the forestry sector from reaching its full potential. Climate change is also a risk to forests and their management. A significant increase in the number and intensity of forest fires across the region is associated with higher summer temperatures, prolonged droughts, and earlier melting of snow in the mountains. (32). In the future, the probability of an increase in forest fires, the length of the fire season, the frequency and intensity of fires will increase in the Mediterranean (33). Furthermore, the increase in CO 2 concentration in the atmosphere, higher temperatures, changes in precipitation, floods, and the duration and frequency of drought will have significant effects on tree growth. These changes will have consequences on the frequency of pest and disease outbreaks (7). The Western Balkans is a hotspot of biodiversity in Europe and contains a great diversity of ecosystems. The territory of the former Yugoslavia is one of the six European centers of biodiversity, containing 40% of vascular plants in Europe, 51% of fish, 74% of birds, and 68% of mammals (34). There is a high level of endemism in the Balkan countries due to the extremely diverse geology, soil, climatic ranges, and altitude. The number and size of protected areas in the region are increasing, although the share of protected land is still low compared to the share in the EU. Biodiversity in the region faces several threats, including deforestation, soil erosion, uncontrolled land use and pollution, as well as unsustainable hunting, fishing, and grazing (7). Climate change is expected to affect all ecosystems in the region, but ecosystems with limited species migration opportunities are particularly at risk. Large reductions in snow cover will lead to a decrease in alpine flora and fauna, as the vegetation of the foothill regions will be replaced by the vegetation of temperate zones (7). In the Western Balkans region, achieving efficient and modern internal transport networks and infrastructure and communication networks between the countries of the region will be a key driver of economic growth and transition. This is a political priority of the countries themselves and the EU because it is an important tool for improving ties across the region and the integration of neighboring countries into the political and economic flow of Europe (7). A series of infrastructure projects are planned, including funding from the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), which will connect capitals, major cities, and airports in the region, enabling faster economic progress by 2030. Although the transport system of the Western Balkan countries has improved over the years, the standards are significantly lower than European ones. Road congestion in and around cities, aging vehicles, poor vehicle maintenance, and changing road conditions all contribute to poor air quality. Pressure on road networks has also increased, between 2001 and 2006 freight transport has almost doubled, and public transport within and between cities is considered inadequate (34). Transport accounts for almost a quarter of the world's CO 2 emissions. Although this figure is lower for the Western Balkans region, at approximately 14%, the share of emissions in the transport sector is growing in line with socio-economic developments. However, despite all the benefits that air transport provides, airplanes are also large emitters of GHGes and contribute significantly to climate change. The number of emissions that occur during one continental flight in Europe is many times higher than the use of other means of transport. At the moment, the aviation industry is responsible for about 2% of total global emissions, and although there are initiatives and measures to reduce them, it is the sector in which emissions are currently growing the fastest. An even bigger problem is the fact that the emissions of international aviation are increasing from year to year, currently, the emissions are 70% higher on an annual level compared to 2005. It is predicted that, if measures are not introduced to reduce emissions, emissions will increase by an additional 300% by 2050. There are no available studies on GHG emissions resulting from air traffic in the region, but they are certainly significant, as the Balkan region is a transit route for a large number of flights. An additional problem is the relatively old airport infrastructure, air pollution, as well as the lack of key competencies of staff engaged in the air transport sector, as well as related companies (35). Air transport must be transformed into a zero-emission sector. There are few studies on the effects of climate change on transport networks in the region (7). For road infrastructure, time stress already represents 30 to 50% of the current cost of road maintenance in Europe. Ten percent of these costs (0.9 billion euros) are related to extreme events, and floods are taking the lead. Significant additional costs for road transport infrastructure are projected due to more frequent extreme rainfall and floods (50-192 million euros per year between 2040-2100). Climate change in combination with transport has a strong impact on air quality. Emissions from transport contribute to air pollution and GHGes that cause climate change, whose effects - especially higher temperatures - worsen human health reactions to air pollution. An efficient transport sector would reduce GHG emissions and reduce the health effects of air pollution. The region has a long history of mining. Exploitation includes aluminum, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, nickel, and zinc, and of precious metals gold, palladium, and platinum, and hydrocarbon fuels coal (lignite), natural gas, and oil (34). By the 1990s, mining, mineral processing, and exploitation had established the region as a major European source of copper, lead, and zinc, and the mining industry was one of the leading industrial sectors (7). After the collapse of the common Yugoslav market in the 1990s, industrial production declined significantly, resulting in reduced pollution, but also many abandoned mines scattered throughout the region. Within the region, approximately one-third of the 180 sites identified are considered significant environmental issues, and one-fifth pose cross-border risks. Environmental problems include waste generation, air pollution, adverse effects on land and biodiversity, water pollution, hazardous substances, noise and vibration, energy use, and visual/aesthetic impacts (7). The dominant route of exposure to pollutants is rivers, which poses a critical transboundary pollution risk for countries in the region. Climate change may exacerbate the above-mentioned existing environmental problems. The risk is increased by a combination of natural disasters such as floods (as a result of more intense precipitation expected in the winter and spring months) and poor infrastructure. The Western Balkans have huge potential for sustainable tourism due to its rich cultural heritage and diversity, attractive coastlines and historic cities. Tourism is one of the largest and fastest-growing economic sectors in the region, and most countries are expected to grow significantly in terms of both contributing to GDP and creating jobs. Similar to agriculture, tourism depends on natural conditions, especially in coastal and mountainous regions. Climate change is projected to have a significant impact on the sensitive mountain environment, with implications for the attractiveness of the mountain environment for tourism and the occurrence of natural hazards (7). Mountain ski resorts are among the tourist sectors that are considered to be the most endangered because it is expected that the duration of the snow season will be significantly reduced in the future. The concentration of activity on a smaller area and a shorter period during the year could also put more pressure on sensitive mountain ecosystems. Coastal regions are also considered very sensitive to climatic conditions, and the Mediterranean region as a whole is expected to become less attractive due to drought and higher temperatures. On the other hand, higher temperatures in the coastal region may favor tourism in hilly and mountainous areas. There are other broad, potential indirect impacts of climate on tourism in the region (changes in freshwater quality, changes, and losses in biodiversity, changed agricultural production - wine tourism, landslides and forest fires, higher incidence of vector diseases). Mitigation policies aimed at reducing GHG emissions will increase transport costs and may have an impact on tourists' travel patterns. In the region the tourism industry will undoubtedly continue to be a growing sector regardless of the climate change challenges. The energy sector is considered extremely important for the economic growth of the Western Balkan countries. There is great potential for the development of this sector primarily in new investments. High dependence on oil and natural gas (imported energy) raises concerns about the security of energy supply and the need to diversify new sources of renewables such as biomass, solar, and wind energy, as well as the introduction of energy efficiency. Current patterns of energy use in the Western Balkans lead to significant environmental impacts. The region as a whole has a high carbon intensity due to the high dependence and use of coal (lignite). Other environmental problems include pollution from energy combustion (e.g., indoor and local air pollution from inefficient and improperly used stoves) and deforestation and land degradation (from excessive use of wood for fuel). Taking into account all these characteristics, the energy sector in the region is the main source of GHG emissions, pollutants, and oil spills. The main domestic sources of electricity production in the region are lignite and hydropower. Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and North Macedonia are mainly dependent on lignite (coal) thermal power plants to generate electricity. Albania draws almost all its electricity from hydropower. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, and Montenegro also have significant hydropower capacity (7). The energy intensity (energy efficiency indicator) of the Western Balkans is high. This can be attributed to the degraded state of energy infrastructure, large energy losses during transformation, transmission, and distribution, and inefficiencies in the end-use sector. Energy systems in the region are considered to be very sensitive to extreme events and temperature changes (14). The extent and nature of the impact depend on the degree to which countries rely on different energy sources. Thermal energy production is sensitive to climate change due to the availability of water and temperature, due to the high dependence of these power plants on cooling water. Lower levels in lakes and rivers, reduced runoff, accelerated evaporation, and warmer water can also reduce the amount of cooling water or cause restrictions on cooling water intake or discharge, limiting production capacity (40). Taking into account the effects of climate change on river water temperature and river flows, the capacity of nuclear and fossil fuel power plants in Southern and Eastern Europe could face a decline of 6–19% for the period 2031–2060 compared to 1971–2000 (40). More frequent extreme events, such as floods, will also jeopardize all types of energy infrastructure and lead to increased maintenance costs (34). In the Western Balkans much of the energy infrastructure requires extensive rehabilitation and replacement, given that it was built in the 1960s and 1970s (7). Climate change is expected to pose risks to electricity transmission network functions and reduce efficiency or change structural integrity, especially for older, poorly maintained facilities (34). Following the expected decline in annual river water levels and the changing seasonality of river flows, total hydropower production in Europe, including the Western Balkans, is expected to fall by 1.66 TWh, or 1.43%, compared to 2005 production levels (40). On the demand side, the trend of warmer winter temperatures and even warmer summers is expected to align the electricity consumption profile, as the demand for cooling energy increases and the thermal energy decreases (34). Electricity systems can be burdened to meet more stringent air conditioning requirements, especially if they rely on hydropower (40). Energy consumption in the Western Balkans has already increased by 53% between 1995 and 2005, and demand is expected to grow by an additional 34% from 2006 to 2030 (23). Economic development, population growth and climate impacts (reduced production and interruptions in electricity production) can together contribute to rising electricity prices and the risk of electricity shortages in the region (40, 41). Adaptation to climate change Adaptation is a risk management strategy that intends to respond to the inevitable effects of climate change and increase resilience - the ability to respond to a change in function or condition in the environment by resisting damage and recovering quickly. The countries of the Western Balkans face several challenges in terms of their adaptability. Countries with well-established, efficient governance and strong, stable economies have a distinct advantage in their adaptable capacities. Croatia has the largest adaptive capacity of the five countries covered by the index. North Macedonia has the lowest adaptive capacity, while Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia are in the middle (9). There is not enough data for Montenegro. In Albania, hydropower sources produce more than 95% of the country's electricity. In 2007, the total supply of the country was only 12% while in 2000 it was 25%. Overall, the share of total demand for renewable energy including hydropower fell from 42% in 2000 to 22% in 2007. The expected increase in long-term mean annual and seasonal air temperatures in Albania and a decrease in mean annual and seasonal rainfall will reduce long-term mean annual and seasonal water runoff. It is predicted that a 20% reduction in runoff will cause a 60% reduction in production. This means that while hydropower may be good for reducing GHG emissions, relying on hydropower can increase a country’s vulnerability to climate change. The precipitation regime is also important for agriculture, which is still the backbone of the Albanian economy. In the transition from communist rule to multi-party democracy, Albania has undergone major political, institutional, and socio-economic changes, and governments have struggled with high unemployment, widespread corruption, poor infrastructure, and powerful organized crime networks, all in a disputed political environment. The transition from a centrally planned state to a more modern open-market economy has been difficult, but the government has adopted a package of fiscal reforms aimed at reducing the large gray economy and attracting foreign investment (9). In Croatia, concerns about water resources are widening as to whether water supply can continue to meet growing drinking water needs. The main issues in agriculture relate to water availability and elevated temperature and focus on the prospects of reduced water supply and higher frequency of droughts. Although Croatia has largely achieved macroeconomic stabilization, deep public resistance and weak political support have inhibited structural reforms. The long-term outlook for growth remains strong, but difficult problems - high unemployment, growing trade deficits, and uneven regional development - remain. The global financial crisis will create significant pressure, and Croatia's high external debt weakened the export sector, tight state budget, and excessive reliance on tourism revenues will result in a greater risk to economic stability in the medium term. In North Macedonia industry and agriculture are the two most important sectors of the economy, but the services sector has recently gained in importance. Agriculture is a priority sector that accounts for a significant share of GDP and employment and contributes to social security and poverty reduction. North Macedonia expects very different effects from changes in temperature and precipitation: projections for reducing effective rains vary from 15 to 40%. Of the country's available water resources, 84% is formed within its borders, so the country is particularly sensitive to the overall reduction of effective rainfall. Agriculture will bear the greatest burden of negative consequences, and the greatest effects are expected in the central and southeastern parts of the country. North Macedonia has limitations at the systemic, institutional, and individual levels. Lack of resources and staff is evident in the ministries of environment and spatial planning, economy, transport, health, and industry. The main economic problems of North Macedonia are low living standards, high unemployment, and relatively modest economic growth (9). Montenegro's vulnerability to climate change is greatest for forest ecosystems. Most Montenegrin forests are established by natural regeneration, and due to their climate and terrain, it is characterized by high biodiversity. They are important producers of biomass and are sources of fruits, herbs, and mushrooms. They provide habitat for wild plant and animal species, maintain and regulate the hydrological regime, protect against landslides and erosion, and absorb significant amounts of carbon. The extremely diverse ecosystems of Montenegro are characterized by rich flora and fauna - about 3,250 plant species, with the highest ratio of vascular flora and surface in Europe. Of the 526 European bird species, 297 can be found regularly in Montenegro, while about 29 other species are occasionally present. The country's small national economy was hit by the 2009 recession, which was significantly caused by negative global economic trends. Unemployment and regional disparities in development remain key political and economic problems (9). Like most of its neighbors in the Western Balkans, Serbia faces dangers associated with rising temperatures. Increasingly frequent and intense droughts during the last two decades have already caused great damage to Serbian agriculture, and it is expected that field production will fall by as much as 10% in the second half of this century. The Serbian agricultural sector is an important part of the national economy and thus increases the country's vulnerability to climate change. Serbian agriculture employs 10% of the workforce and accounts for 26% of export earnings. With incomplete privatization and incomplete structural reforms, Serbia's economy remains in transition. The country's economic challenges include high government spending on wages, pensions, and unemployment, outdated technologies, degraded infrastructure, and low levels of domestic investment. Other problems include the growing need for new government borrowing combined with growing public and private external debt and stagnant levels of foreign investment. An inefficient justice system, high levels of corruption, and an aging population add to the difficulties. Serbia's strategic position, relatively cheap and skilled labor, and a generous package of incentives for foreign investment are factors conducive to economic growth (9). Conclusions The main objective of this paper is to present the state of climate change in six Western Balkans countries, of which only Croatia is a member of the EU, for the needs of planning activities and initial harmonization with the EU plan to reaching net-zero GHG emissions by 2050. The paper provides an overview of climate change by country, scenario analysis, and policy recommendations. It can be concluded that all countries of the Western Balkans have adopted (or are in the process of adopting) the necessary regulations and strategies towards climate change mitigation. Climate change mitigation strategies in Albania for the energy sector include switching to power plants using cleaner energy sources. Initiatives within agriculture focus on improving manure management and grazing systems and crop rotation. Also, the construction of new landfills with methane recovery and solid waste incinerators is intended to reduce waste-related emissions. Strategies related to land-use change and forestry include the development of sustainable forestry, the improvement of forest management practices, and the rehabilitation of degraded forest land. The development of Bosnia and Herzegovina's climate change mitigation strategy should include a national mitigation policy related to national economic and development plans; identifying measures and activities necessary for implementation; and provisions for direct government involvement at the entity level. Croatia has implemented several measures to mitigate climate change. The largest percentage of changes occurred in transport, land-use change, forestry, and waste. In the energy sector, the implemented measures included the promotion of the use of renewable energy sources in electricity production, the application of cogeneration and the improvement of energy efficiency in building construction, and also the construction of 1,000 MW nuclear power plants by 2024. In the transport sector, biofuel and a program for the promotion of railway transport are being introduced. New measures related to industrial processes are intended to reduce N 2 O emissions in the production of nitric acid and emissions of volatile organic compounds in the use of solvents. New waste measures include avoiding and reducing municipal waste generation, increased recycling of municipal waste, and the use of landfill gas to generate electricity. In agriculture, efficient management of organic manure is promoted, and in the land use and forestry sector, efforts are being made to improve the management of private forests and new forest plantations. The plan to reduce emissions in North Macedonia envisages the use of natural gas for electricity production, maximizing the potential of hydropower and improving energy efficiency. Transport measures include improving the energy efficiency of vehicles and public urban and interurban transport. The waste strategy introduces sustainable management and measures for waste selection and recycling, composting, and reduction of landfilled waste. The main strategy in agriculture focuses on manure management and forestry on afforestation. Montenegro has identified emission reduction strategies for each sector. Strategies for the energy sector include combining heat and power generation, increasing the efficiency of industrial boilers and replacing coal with liquefied petroleum gas in industrial boiler rooms, and producing high-temperature heat. Plans for the transport sector envisage the replacement of fossil fuels with alternative fuels and the development of a more efficient transport system. Strategies for agriculture include improving manure management and encouraging organic agriculture. In the land use and forestry sector, Montenegro intends to increase the share of highly productive forests, rehabilitate damaged forests and preserve and improve forest habitats. Serbia's mitigation plans for the energy sector include improving energy efficiency and using more renewable energy sources. Automation, monitoring, and use of waste energy are the main strategies for reducing emissions in the field of industrial processes. In the transport sector, Serbia seeks to re-establish an efficient international railway system, repair roads, increase the level and efficiency of river transport and stop the production of leaded petrol. The use of biogas in the production of heat and electricity for local consumption is a key strategy for reducing agricultural emissions, and afforestation is a desirable strategy in the sector of land-use change and forestry. In the waste sector, Serbia plans to establish regional landfills and increase recycling rates. The implementation of specific activities is at a low level. The reasons for this most often lies in the insufficient commitment of decision-makers to make significant changes in the field of climate change transition (lower level of economic development, lack of investment, preservation of social peace). Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Availability of data and materials Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Funding Not applicable. Authors’ contributions "SK analyzed CO 2 emission in Western Balkans, SŠ analyzed how climate change affects Western Balkans, and IP analyzed GHG emission in Western Balkans. All authors read and approved the final manuscript." Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the Public Scholarship, Development, Disability, and Maintenance Fund of the Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia (Grant No: 11081-4/2019), and Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Grant No: 451-03-9/2021-14/200026) for financial support. References Allen MR, Dube OP, Solecki W, Aragón-Durand F., Cramer W, Humphreys S, Kainuma M, Kala J, Mahowald N, Mulugetta Y, Perez R, Wairiu M, Zickfeld K (2018) Framing and Context. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds.) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Available via https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_Low_Res.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2021. PBES (2019) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. In Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, Ngo HT, Guèze M, Agard J, Arneth A, Balvanera P, Brauman KA, Butchart SHM, Chan KMA, Garibaldi LA, Ichii K, Liu J, Subramanian SM, Midgley GF, Miloslavich P, Molnár Z, Obura D, Pfaff A, Polasky S, Purvis A, Razzaque J, Reyers B, Roy Chowdhury R, Shin YJ, Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Willis KJ, Zayas CN (eds.). IPBES secretariat. Available via https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/inline/files/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2021. RP (2019) Global Resources Outlook 2019: Natural resources for the future we want. Oberle, B, Bringezu S, Hatfield-Dodds S, Hellweg S, Schandl H, Clement J, Cabernard L, Che N, Chen D, Droz-Georget H, Ekins P, Fischer-Kowalski M, Flörke M, Frank S, Froemelt A, Geschke A, Haupt M, Havlik P, Hüfner R, Lenzen M, Lieber M, Liu B, Lu Y, Lutter S, Mehr J, Miatto A, Newth D, Oberschelp C, Obersteiner M, Pfister S, Piccoli E, Schaldach R, Schüngel J, Sonderegger T, Sudheshwar A, Tanikawa H, van der Voet E, Walker C, West J, Wang Z, Zhu B A Report of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme. Available via file:///C:/Users/PC/AppData/Local/Temp/GRO_2019.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2021. EEA (2019) The European environment — state and outlook 2020. Publications Office of the European Union. Available via https://d2ouvy59p0dg6k.cloudfront.net/downloads/soer_2020_executive_summary_embargoed_4_december.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2021. The European Green Deal (2019) Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the european council, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Available via https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2021. United Nations Development Programme UNDP https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld. Accessed 26 June 2021. Alfthan B, Krilasevic E, Venturini S, Bajrovic S, Jurek M, Schoolmeester T, Sandei PC, Egerer H, Kurvits T (2015) Outlook on climate change adaptation in the Western Balkan mountains. United Nations Environment Programme. GRIDArendal and Environmental Innovations Association. Available via https://gridarendal-website-live.s3.amazonaws.com/production/documents/:s_document/22/original/BalkanMountains_screen.pdf?1483646275. Accessed 27 June 2021. Vuković A, Vujadinović Mandić M (2018) Study on climate change in the Western Balkans region. Regional Cooperation Council Secretariat. Available via https://www.rcc.int/download/docs/2018-05-Study-on-Climate-Change-in-WB-2a-lowres.pdf/06af8f7432484a6ce384ebcb8c05e8d7.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2021. Bogdanovic J, Nikolayeva L, Novikov V, Siljic A, Simonett O, Egerer H, Sandei PC (2012) Climate change in the West Balkans. ENVSEC, Zoï environment network. Available via http://archive.zoinet.org/web/sites/default/files/publications/Climate-change-west-balkans.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2021. UNFCCC United Nations Climate Change (2015) Elements of Adaptation. Available via http://unfccc.int/adaptation/items/7006.php. Accessed 28 June 2021. Kostopoulou E, Jones PD (2005) Assessment of climate extremes in the Eastern Mediterranean. Meteorol Atmos Phys 89:69–85. doi:10.1007/s00703-005-0122-2. Lelieveld J, Hadjinicolaou P, Kostopoulou E, Chenoweth J, Maayar ME, Giannakopoulos C, Hannides C, Lange MA, Tanarhte M, Tyrlis E, Xoplaki E (2012) Climate change and impacts in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East. Clim Change 114:667–687. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0418-4. Önol B, Semazzi FHM (2009) Regionalization of climate change simulations over the Eastern Mediterranean. J. Climate 22:1944–1961. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI1807.1. World Bank (2014) Turn down the Heat: Confronting the new climate normal. World Bank. Available via https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20595. Accessed 28 June 2021. Kotlarski, S., Bosshard, T., Lüthi, D., Pall, P., Schär, C. (2011) Elevation gradients of European climate change in the regional climate model COSMO-CLM. Clim. Change, vol. 112, pp. 189–215. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0195-5 Hoppe T, van den Berg MM, Coenen FH (2014) Reflections on the uptake of climate change policies by local governments: facing the challenges of mitigation and adaptation. Energ Sustain Soc 4:8 doi:10.1186/2192-0567-4-8. Kharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Wehner M (2013) Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble. Clim Change 119:345–357. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0705-8. World Bank (2003) Water Resources Management in South Eastern Europe, Volume I. Issues and Directions. World Bank. Available via https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15280. Accessed 28 June 2021. UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2011) Second Assessment of Transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwaters: executive summary. Zoï Environment Network. Available via https://unece.org/DAM/env/water/publications/assessment/English/Executive_Summary_EN_web.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2021. EEA European Environment Agency (2010) Environmental trends and perspectives in the Western Balkans: future production and consumption patterns. Available via https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/western-balkans. Accessed 29 June 2021. Arnell NW, Gosling SN (2013) The impacts of climate change on river flow regimes at the global scale. J Hydrol 486:351–64. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.010. Schneider C, Laize CLR, Acreman M, Florke M (2013) How will climate change modify river flow regimes in Europe? Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 17:325–39. doi:10.5194/hess-17-325-2013. EEA European Environment Agency (2008) National emissions reported to the UNFCCC and to the EU greenhouse gas monitoring mechanism. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/national-emissions-reported-to-the-unfccc-and-to-the-eu-greenhouse-gas-monitoring-mechanism-14. Accessed 29 June 2021. Volk T, Erjavec E, Mortensen K (2014) Agricultural policy and european integration in South-Eastern Europe. FAO. Available via http://www.fao.org/3/i4166e/i4166e.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2021. World Bank (2012) Employment in agriculture (per cent of total employment), World Bank Available via https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.AGR.EMPL.ZS. Accessed 29 June 2021. Gocic M, Trajkovic S (2014) Spatiotemporal characteristics of drought in Serbia. J Hydrol 510:110–23. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.030. Olesen JE, Bindi M (2002) Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur J Agron 6:239–262. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00004-7 Giannakopoulos C, Le Sager P, Bindi M, Moriondo M, Kostopoulou E, Goodess CM (2009) Climatic changes and associated impacts in the mediterranean resulting from a 2°C global warming. Global Planet Change 68:209–24. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.06.001. Sutton WR, Srivastava JP, Neumann JE (2013) Looking beyond the horizon: how climate change impacts and adaptation responses will reshape agriculture in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. World Bank. Available via https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/676601468249642651/pdf/Looking-beyond-the-horizon-how-climate-change-impacts-and-adaptation-responses-will-reshape-agriculture-in-Eastern-Europe-and-Central-Asia.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2021. Markus-Johansson M, Mesquita B, Nemeth A., Dimovski M, Monnier C, Kiss-Parciu P (2010) Illegal logging in South Eastern Europe: Regional Report. REC Regional Environment Centre for Central and Eastern Europe. Available via http://documents.rec.org/publications/Illegal_Logging_in_South_Eastern_Europe_Regional_Report_EN_OCT_2010.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2021. Parviainen J (2005) Virgin and natural forests in the temperate zone of Europe. For Snow Landsc Res 79:9–18. Mátyás C (2010) Forecasts needed for retreating forests. Nature 464:1271. doi: 10.1038/4641271a. IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds.). Cambridge University Press. Available via https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ar4_wg2_full_report.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2021. Knez S (2021) A model of managerial competences in aviation micro-enterprises. Dissertation, University of Maribor. World Bank (2009) Adapting to Climate Change in Europe and Central Asia. World Bank. Available via https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/127181468024643244/pdf/489480ESW0ECA010Box338935B01PUBLIC1.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2021. Van Vliet MTH, Yearsley JR, Ludwig F, Vögele S, Lettenmaier DP, Kabat P (2012) Vulnerability of U.S. and European electricity supply to climate change. Nat Clim Change 2:676–81. doi:10.1038/nclimate1546 Hamududu B, Killingtveit A (2012) Assessing climate change impacts on global hydropower. Energies 5:305–22. doi:10.3390/en5020305. McDermott GR, Nilsen ØA (2014) Electricity prices, river temperatures, and cooling water scarcity. Land Econ 90:31–48. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1941820. EC European Commission (2013) An EU Strategy on adaptation to climate change. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. Available via http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2013:0216:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 1 July 2021. Ben Othman A, Ouni A, Besbes M (2020) Deep learning-based estimation of PV power plant potential under climate change: a case study of El Akarit, Tunisia. Energ Sustain Soc 10:34. doi:10.1186/s13705-020-00266-1. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revise before review 30 Aug, 2021 Editor assigned by journal 24 Aug, 2021 Submission checks completed at journal 24 Aug, 2021 Editor invited by journal 23 Aug, 2021 First submitted to journal 19 Aug, 2021 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-829240","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Original article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":47833685,"identity":"1c09df2a-f0a7-454b-a527-1fc8861f9694","order_by":0,"name":"Sandi Knez","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Aviation Carrer Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sandi","middleName":"","lastName":"Knez","suffix":""},{"id":47833686,"identity":"74554189-ce5b-4da4-9a7d-4692ee9e7053","order_by":1,"name":"Snežana Štrbac","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-6490","institution":"Institut za hemiju tehnologiju i metalurgiju","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Snežana","middleName":"","lastName":"Štrbac","suffix":""},{"id":47833687,"identity":"37c8731f-cb17-43e2-8e72-d4eae75f1598","order_by":2,"name":"Iztok Podbregar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Univerza v Mariboru Fakulteta za organizacijske vede","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Iztok","middleName":"","lastName":"Podbregar","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2021-08-20 10:30:03","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-829240/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-829240/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":12812244,"identity":"76172551-3290-4de9-b55a-e01edeff4a7d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-26 20:36:55","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":182897,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Western Balkans countries (9).","description":"","filename":"Figure1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-829240/v1/749e80bcc9ee4a61faecaed8.jpg"},{"id":12811866,"identity":"619e30b1-2069-4b7a-9fd4-8fb0323f2559","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-26 20:33:55","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":448447,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Temperature change (°C) in the Western Balkans. Top row – near future, middle row – mid-century, and bottom row – end of the century periods according to RCP4.5 scenario (left), RCP8.5 scenario (middle), and mean maximum temperature according to RCP8.5 scenario (right) (8).","description":"","filename":"Figure2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-829240/v1/0cec94c5067d5e963cd9ebf9.jpg"},{"id":12811864,"identity":"d03a7134-3053-484b-b9d2-ff4a23ef8796","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-26 20:33:55","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":355053,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Accumulated precipitation change (%) in Western Balkans. Top row – near future, middle row – mid-century, and bottom row – end of the century periods according to RCP4.5 scenario (left), RCP8.5 scenario (middle), and mean accumulated precipitation according to RCP8.5 scenario (right) (8).","description":"","filename":"Figure3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-829240/v1/9e1e8f4c2ff90137f1c657ac.jpg"},{"id":12811863,"identity":"297564b5-49c4-4fb0-a76b-9822fb7f9642","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-26 20:33:55","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":69874,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita) in the Western Balkans (source: World Bank)","description":"","filename":"Figure4.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-829240/v1/ca4541b8524178065d125ee9.jpg"},{"id":12811868,"identity":"337baf28-3d04-4188-9370-58e935fce5f3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-26 20:33:56","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":382465,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Annual total CO2 emissions, by world region (source: World Bank)","description":"","filename":"Figure5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-829240/v1/6e6b29fe1dd92d55ec0171eb.png"},{"id":12812245,"identity":"8584cc1c-44d0-4eb7-9045-bfb318906356","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-08-26 20:36:56","extension":"jpg","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":62797,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Total GHG emissions (kt of CO2 equivalent) for Western Balkans (source: World Bank)","description":"","filename":"Figure6.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-829240/v1/1a574bf086e97b07418a8745.jpg"},{"id":13711541,"identity":"60f5d686-a127-43b6-95d9-f7b9fd187593","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-17 14:23:35","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1228457,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-829240/v1/e0820f46-1ed3-44b6-b85e-785c6c3a10b7.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eClimate Change in the Western Balkans and Eu Green Deal – Coherence, Challenges, and Perspective\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe atmosphere is warming and the climate is changing every year. One million of the eight million species on the planet risk being lost. Forests and oceans are polluted and destroyed (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). Over the last 20 years, governments have intensified their consideration of the threats posed by climate change, by gradually implementing strategic action measures to combat such change, and in parallel, by advancing scientific knowledge on climate change. So far, the global policy response has mainly focused on mitigating climate change by reducing anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe European Commission (EC) officially adopted the European Union (EU) strategy on adaptation to climate change in 2021. The new strategy sets out how the EU can adapt to the unavoidable impacts of climate change and become climate resilient by 2050. In addition to the Strategy, European Green Deal (2019) is also a response to these challenges (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). The European Green Deal is part of the strategy of the EC for the implementation of the United Nation\u0026rsquo;s 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e) and aims to transform the EU into a prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient, and competitive economy, which has no net GHG emissions in 2050 and where economic growth is separate from resource use. It also aims to protect, preserve and enhance the EU's natural capital and to protect the citizen's health and well-being from the risks and impacts associated with changes in the environment. The EU must lead the coordination of international efforts to build a coherent financial system that supports sustainable solutions. The EU and its member states have become broadly committed to adaptation and have begun to address these challenges by establishing adaptation strategies at all levels. The most important of these are the national energy and climate plans and the proposed strategic national plans for the implementation of the common agricultural policy. Member states must also ensure that policies and laws are effectively enforced. The Commission has proposed a new (8th) Environmental Action Program - supporting the European Green Deal and includes new monitoring mechanisms to ensure that Europe stays on track to meet its environmental goals. The EC has encouraged all member states to develop adaptation strategies in line with national risk reduction plans, including cross-border issues. It also supports the efforts of European cities to prepare local adaptation strategies and plans. Which aims to increase support for local activities, provide a platform for greater engagement and networking of municipalities and raise public awareness of adaptation. To address the adjustment of the most vulnerable sectors, the EC continues to integrate adaptation into EU policies. The EC also seeks to improve the resilience of infrastructure to climate change in Europe through a review of existing standards in the fields of energy, transport, and construction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs climate change and biodiversity loss are not limited by national borders, the environmental ambition of the European Green Deal Europa will not achieve by acting alone. The EU must use its influence, expertise, and financial resources to mobilize its neighbors to join it on a sustainable path. Although the transferability of adaptation knowledge in European and neighboring countries is considered key to facilitating countries in the early stages of adaptation planning to quickly and efficiently develop and finalize the policy process and implement concrete measures, contextual dependence may affect actual transferability. From that aspect, the Western Balkans is a particularly interesting area for the EU. The Western Balkans can play an important role in maximizing the impact of the European Green Deal. The main objective of this paper is to present the state of climate change in six Western Balkans countries, of which only Croatia is a member of the EU, for the needs of planning activities and initial harmonization with the EU plan to reaching net-zero GHG emissions (GHG) by 2050.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMost countries of the Western Balkans (Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Croatia) spent the 1990s affected by the conflict over the break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, which delayed economic transition and resulted in significantly lower living standards than EU countries (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). The Western Balkans is a term used by the European Union for a region that includes Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia, and Albania (Fig.\u0026nbsp;1).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eToday, the countries of the Western Balkans are at a turning point in the development of their societies, economy, and environment. The main goals of the countries in the region are EU integration and EU accession, with Croatia becoming a member in 2013 (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). As potential candidates and candidates for EU accession, all countries are motivated to respect the Paris Agreement and achieve the EU2020 and EU2030 goals of increasing energy efficiency, reducing GHG emissions, and producing energy from renewable sources. The EU integration will have a strong impact on climate and environmental policies, laws, and actions in the coming decades (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn this paper, the data were obtained through a desk research of the secondary literature: relevant publications, articles, documents, and relevant state documents of the Western Balkan countries. All data are not updated which particular attention should be noted.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eClimate change in the Western Balkans\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn proportion to the size of its geographical area, the Balkan countries are characterized by a different climate. Albania has a Mediterranean climate with humid, mild winters and dry, warm summers, as well as the southern part of Montenegro and the coastal and lowland areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In the remaining areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the climate ranges from moderately continental to alpine. The central and northern parts of Montenegro have the characteristics of a mountain climate, the far north of Montenegro has a continental climate, but with the influences of the Mediterranean Sea on temperature and precipitation. Most of Croatia has a rainy-moderately warm climate. The climate in North Macedonia varies from sub-Mediterranean to moderately continental/sub-Mediterranean to continental and from cold-continental to alpine sub-climate. Serbia's climate varies in most areas from moderately continental to continental in the mountains to Mediterranean subtropical and continental in the southwest (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e). To assess the impact of global warming on climate change across the Western Balkans region, two meteorological parameters were selected: temperature and precipitation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eTemperature\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTemperatures in the region have risen in the last fifty years and every country has experienced warming with the acceleration of this trend in recent decades (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e). The average temperature increased by 1.2\u0026deg;C. The temperature increases from south to north. Through central and southern Albania and North Macedonia, changes are in the interval of 0.5\u0026deg;C to 1.0\u0026deg;C, and over northern Albania and other Western Balkan countries in the interval 1.0-1.5\u0026deg;C. The average ten-year trend has a similar spatial distribution of change intensity, with values of 0.15\u0026deg;C to 0.2\u0026deg;C, declining to the south, and mostly increasing in the central part of the region (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). Temperature changes can be analyzed seasonally in winter (December-January-February), spring (March-April-May), summer (June-July-August), and autumn (September-October-November). Undoubtedly, the highest increase in temperature is during the summer season (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). Summer is the season for which scenarios and trends with the highest temperature increases are predicted (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e). The frequency of extreme temperatures (heat waves) has also increased across the region (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to the Two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP), two future climate change scenarios are foreseen for the Western Balkans region: RCP4.5 (stabilization scenario, with the peak of GHG emissions around 2040, and their decline thereafter) and RCP8.5 (a scenario of continuous increase, where GHG concentrations continue to rise until the end of the century) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2). According to the RCP4.5 scenario, the expected temperature changes over the near future (2016\u0026ndash;2035) are with an average increase of 0.8\u0026deg;C, and according to the RCP8.5 scenario, temperature changes are significant with an average regional increase of 1.0\u0026deg;C. The expected temperature changes according to the RCP4.5 scenario during the end of the century (2081\u0026ndash;2100) are that the temperature increase shows stabilization with an average increase of 2.0\u0026deg;C, and according to the RCP8.5 scenario, the temperature will continue to rise significantly, reaching an average value of 4.4\u0026deg;C. During the end of the century (2081\u0026ndash;2100) according to the RCP4.5 scenario, the temperature stabilizes, and according to the RCP8.5, frost days (over 50 days) are expected to decrease in the entire region (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). The medium-emission scenario predicts that the eastern Mediterranean will be warmer by the end of the twenty-first century of 3.5\u0026ndash;7\u0026deg;C, with the largest daily increase recorded in the Western Balkans (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e). Based on the high emission scenario, a warm-up of 5\u0026ndash;8\u0026deg;C will be in the eastern Mediterranean in summer (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e). Among the existing models, the consensus is that during the twenty-first century, the Western Balkans will experience significant warming (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e), which will be higher than the world average (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePrecipitation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the last fifty years, changes in precipitation have not been as clear as changes in temperature. Due to the complex topography of the mountains, generalizing the observed climate trends is difficult, especially since the Western Balkans have two climatic areas - continental/Mediterranean and alpine (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). The average annual accumulation of precipitation in the Western Balkans region did not change compared to the period from 1961 to 1980. The current change in precipitation is 0.2%. During the 1980s and 1990s, the amount of precipitation decreased, only to then begin to increase and return to values from the period defined as the past climate (1961\u0026ndash;1980). This is the reason for the small change of 0.2% (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). The Western Balkans will witness a significant reduction in annual rainfall. Two scenarios, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, can also be chosen for future precipitation predictions (Fig.\u0026nbsp;3). According to the scenario RCP4.5 during the near future period (2016\u0026ndash;2035) compared to the base period (1986\u0026ndash;2005), the amount of precipitation will not have significant expected changes in either annual or seasonal values, the mean annual change will be within the interval \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;5% and +\u0026thinsp;5%. According to the RCP8.5 scenario, the change in precipitation shows a similar trend as in the RCP4.5 scenario, but with a slightly different distribution. During the middle ages (2046\u0026ndash;2065) according to scenario RCP4.5, the expected changes in precipitation will not show statistically significant changes in average annual and seasonal values, and according to scenario RCP8.5, the decrease in precipitation will be significant in Albania and part of Montenegro during June-July-August. During the end of the century (2081\u0026ndash;2100) according to the RCP4.5 scenario, the expected changes in the amount of precipitation will be stabilized, and according to the RCP8.5 scenario, a serious decrease in the amount of precipitation will be during the June-July-August season in southern Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Albania and North Macedonia (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). In high-emission scenarios, the expected decrease in precipitation is more pronounced and is especially pronounced in summer (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e). In winter, on the contrary, the amount of precipitation will increase in the mountains and the region in general (15; 16). Extreme rainfall is not expected in the region, however, floods are predicted to become more frequent due to more winter rainfall which will cause spring floods (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eGHG emissions and mitigation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom 1990 to 2018, CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e emissions for the Western Balkans ranged from 1 to just over 8 metric tons per capita (Fig.\u0026nbsp;4). Annual emissions per capita are slightly more than half of the emissions for EU countries, and slightly more than a quarter compared to the United States (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e). The largest discrepancy is evident in the data on total emissions. Compared to China, the US, and the EU, emissions from the Western Balkans are barely registered (Fig.\u0026nbsp;5) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom 1990 to 2018, total GHG emissions (kt of CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e equivalent) for the Western Balkans are presented in Fig.\u0026nbsp;6.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGreenhouse gas emissions in Albania between 1990 and 2000, associated with changes in land use and forestry, declined significantly, while emissions in all other sectors increased. Total emissions related to land-use change and forestry accounted for 45% of total emissions. The increase in emissions in the energy sector combined with the decrease in emissions related to changes in land use and forestry has resulted in the energy sector having the largest share in total emissions in Albania. The waste sector shows the largest percentage increase, but in absolute terms, waste emissions have increased less than in any other sector (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e). Data on GHG emissions for Bosnia and Herzegovina for individual sectors are only available for one year, so trend analysis is not possible (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e). In Croatia, in the period from 1990 to 2007, the energy sector accounted for 70% of total GHG emissions. During that period, emissions in the waste, transport, and energy sectors also increased, while in the agricultural and industrial processes sectors, emissions decreased. Thanks to changes in land use and forestry, the absorption of GHG emissions has increased, which have further reduced total emissions (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e). In North Macedonia between 1990 and 2002, the reduction in emissions related to land-use change and forestry seems impressive, but this sector accounts for only 2% of total emissions. In 2002, the energy sector accounted for the largest share of 70%. In that period, total GHG emissions fell by 8%, which can be mainly attributed to the reduction of emissions from the agricultural sector (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e). In Montenegro, total GHG emissions decreased by 2% between 1990 and 2003, with changes in land use and forestry making the largest contribution. However, in 2003, the sector accounted for only 17% of total emissions. Although emissions from the energy sector increased slightly during this period, the share of total emissions attributed to the energy sector increased slightly from 51 to 54% (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e). Between 1990 and 1998, GHG emissions in Serbia decreased by 22%, with most coming from the energy sector (79%). Emissions related to land-use change in both the forestry and waste sectors have experienced a significant percentage change, but these sectors represent a small percentage of total emissions (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVulnerability of individual sectors to climate change\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn terms of the amount of water available per person, the countries of the Western Balkans are the richest in water in Europe (10,600 cubic meters, which is twice the European average) (18). Most of this water comes from mountain springs, and some countries receive a significant share of their water from other countries across transboundary rivers. Water resources have always played an important role in the economies of the Western Balkans. Agriculture is largely dependent on water, where disturbances in the precipitation regime and a higher risk of drought and extreme weather conditions have significant implications for the stability of this sector. Water resources are also used to produce electricity. On average, about 37% of electricity produced comes from hydropower, although it is much higher in Albania (100%), Croatia (42%), and Montenegro (45.3%). Hydropower is affected by accelerated evaporation and drought, as well as changes in the time and volume of water flow. More frequent extreme events, such as floods, can also threaten energy infrastructure. In terms of water resources, the region faces several common problems, including weak transboundary cooperation and water pollution. After the break-up of the former Yugoslavia, there are more than 13 internationally common basins and four cross-border lakes. Most states share one or more basins. However, cross-border cooperation is generally weak, with low political priorities, insufficient institutional capacity, poor information exchange and joint monitoring, and in some cases conflicts that are some of the main factors (19). Water quality is also a cause for serious concern. Wastewater discharges are a major source of pollution for both surface and groundwater, and wastewater treatment is often poor or absent (20). In many areas of the Western Balkans, groundwater sources are at risk of agricultural runoff pollution - the biggest impact of nitrogen pollution (18). Climate change poses additional challenges in terms of water availability, quality and management. Climate change will exacerbate existing pressures on water resources and pose significant risks to sectors where water is a limiting factor. Almost all climate projections agree that countries in the region will experience a significant drop in rainfall in the twenty-first century, followed by increasing drought conditions and thus declining water availability (21). Higher temperatures will also move the snow line. By 2050, the snow cover is expected to decrease (22). Intense precipitation and increased snowmelt during the winter will increase the risk of floods across the region (14).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLand quality has widespread implications not only for agriculture but also for land production capacity, and the risk of land degradation is likely to increase with climate change. Rising temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, floods and droughts directly affect soil properties and processes, which can lead to accelerated erosion, soil degradation, and desertification (23). When drought is followed by periods of intense rain on steep, unstable terrain, the land is unable to absorb large amounts of water, resulting in the excessive runoff, landslides, and floods. Fires and overexploitation of resources can further contribute to desertification. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll countries in the region have extremely diverse natural potential for agricultural production, from fertile plains and river valleys to less productive karst, hilly and mountainous areas. The agricultural sector in the region generates an average of 11% of gross domestic product (GDP) (24). Eighteen percent of the population is employed in agriculture (25), which is often an economic and development driver for rural areas, where the share of employees in agriculture is much higher than the national average. Agriculture is a sector that can be considered the most vulnerable to climate change. Droughts in the Balkans have been identified as a key risk for agricultural production (26). Future projections of climate change and their impact on agriculture at the European level indicate that there will be more losses in the southern areas, including the Balkans. Key risks include reduced and increased yield variability, as well as reduced areas suitable for growing traditional crops (27). The negative effects of climate change on yields could be reduced if adaptation options were applied, but this would require 40% more water (28). Some alpine-mountainous regions, which today are characterized by lower average temperatures and shorter growing seasons than lowland areas, may benefit. For example, wheat yields in alpine areas are projected to increase significantly (29). The livestock sector is currently underrepresented in climate impact research in the region and there are only a few modeling studies (14).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eForests cover a large part of the land area of the Western Balkans (25) and play a significant economic and social role in all countries, both in terms of national economies and in terms of livelihoods. The wood industry significantly contributes to the development of local economies. In some countries, the contribution of forestry to GDP is high, such as in Montenegro (8%), while in other countries it ranges between 0.5 and 2.5% (30). Forests also provide several ecosystem services, including maintaining biodiversity, mitigating and adapting to the effects of climate change, and regulating soil and water regimes. The mountainous areas of the Western Balkans covered with forests are very rich in biodiversity, both in terms of flora and fauna, whether of global or European importance for conservation (7). There are vast areas of still preserved, natural, and semi-natural ecosystems that benefit both nature and humans through ecosystem services on which most local communities still depend heavily. Rainforest relics still exist in remote areas, mountains, and swamps, representing the last refuge of these forests in Europe (31). The reduction of the rural population and migration from rural to urban areas, especially from mountainous areas, has resulted in fewer and fewer young people engaging in forestry and exerting less pressure on cutting firewood for households. However, there are still concerns in the region about the quality of forests due to inadequate management of state-owned and privately owned forests (30), while factors such as illegal logging and corruption hinder the forestry sector from reaching its full potential. Climate change is also a risk to forests and their management. A significant increase in the number and intensity of forest fires across the region is associated with higher summer temperatures, prolonged droughts, and earlier melting of snow in the mountains. (32). In the future, the probability of an increase in forest fires, the length of the fire season, the frequency and intensity of fires will increase in the Mediterranean (33). Furthermore, the increase in CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e concentration in the atmosphere, higher temperatures, changes in precipitation, floods, and the duration and frequency of drought will have significant effects on tree growth. These changes will have consequences on the frequency of pest and disease outbreaks (7).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Western Balkans is a hotspot of biodiversity in Europe and contains a great diversity of ecosystems. The territory of the former Yugoslavia is one of the six European centers of biodiversity, containing 40% of vascular plants in Europe, 51% of fish, 74% of birds, and 68% of mammals (34). There is a high level of endemism in the Balkan countries due to the extremely diverse geology, soil, climatic ranges, and altitude. The number and size of protected areas in the region are increasing, although the share of protected land is still low compared to the share in the EU. Biodiversity in the region faces several threats, including deforestation, soil erosion, uncontrolled land use and pollution, as well as unsustainable hunting, fishing, and grazing (7). Climate change is expected to affect all ecosystems in the region, but ecosystems with limited species migration opportunities are particularly at risk. Large reductions in snow cover will lead to a decrease in alpine flora and fauna, as the vegetation of the foothill regions will be replaced by the vegetation of temperate zones (7).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the Western Balkans region, achieving efficient and modern internal transport networks and infrastructure and communication networks between the countries of the region will be a key driver of economic growth and transition. This is a political priority of the countries themselves and the EU because it is an important tool for improving ties across the region and the integration of neighboring countries into the political and economic flow of Europe (7). A series of infrastructure projects are planned, including funding from the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), which will connect capitals, major cities, and airports in the region, enabling faster economic progress by 2030. Although the transport system of the Western Balkan countries has improved over the years, the standards are significantly lower than European ones. Road congestion in and around cities, aging vehicles, poor vehicle maintenance, and changing road conditions all contribute to poor air quality. Pressure on road networks has also increased, between 2001 and 2006 freight transport has almost doubled, and public transport within and between cities is considered inadequate (34). Transport accounts for almost a quarter of the world\u0026apos;s CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e emissions. Although this figure is lower for the Western Balkans region, at approximately 14%, the share of emissions in the transport sector is growing in line with socio-economic developments. However, despite all the benefits that air transport provides, airplanes are also large emitters of GHGes and contribute significantly to climate change. The number of emissions that occur during one continental flight in Europe is many times higher than the use of other means of transport. At the moment, the aviation industry is responsible for about 2% of total global emissions, and although there are initiatives and measures to reduce them, it is the sector in which emissions are currently growing the fastest. An even bigger problem is the fact that the emissions of international aviation are increasing from year to year, currently, the emissions are 70% higher on an annual level compared to 2005. It is predicted that, if measures are not introduced to reduce emissions, emissions will increase by an additional 300% by 2050. There are no available studies on GHG emissions resulting from air traffic in the region, but they are certainly significant, as the Balkan region is a transit route for a large number of flights. An additional problem is the relatively old airport infrastructure, air pollution, as well as the lack of key competencies of staff engaged in the air transport sector, as well as related companies (35). Air transport must be transformed into a zero-emission sector. There are few studies on the effects of climate change on transport networks in the region (7). For road infrastructure, time stress already represents 30 to 50% of the current cost of road maintenance in Europe. Ten percent of these costs (0.9 billion euros) are related to extreme events, and floods are taking the lead. Significant additional costs for road transport infrastructure are projected due to more frequent extreme rainfall and floods (50-192 million euros per year between 2040-2100). Climate change in combination with transport has a strong impact on air quality. Emissions from transport contribute to air pollution and GHGes that cause climate change, whose effects - especially higher temperatures - worsen human health reactions to air pollution. An efficient transport sector would reduce GHG emissions and reduce the health effects of air pollution.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe region has a long history of mining. Exploitation includes aluminum, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, nickel, and zinc, and of precious metals gold, palladium, and platinum, and hydrocarbon fuels coal (lignite), natural gas, and oil (34). By the 1990s, mining, mineral processing, and exploitation had established the region as a major European source of copper, lead, and zinc, and the mining industry was one of the leading industrial sectors (7). After the collapse of the common Yugoslav market in the 1990s, industrial production declined significantly, resulting in reduced pollution, but also many abandoned mines scattered throughout the region. Within the region, approximately one-third of the 180 sites identified are considered significant environmental issues, and one-fifth pose cross-border risks. Environmental problems include waste generation, air pollution, adverse effects on land and biodiversity, water pollution, hazardous substances, noise and vibration, energy use, and visual/aesthetic impacts (7). The dominant route of exposure to pollutants is rivers, which poses a critical transboundary pollution risk for countries in the region. Climate change may exacerbate the above-mentioned existing environmental problems. The risk is increased by a combination of natural disasters such as floods (as a result of more intense precipitation expected in the winter and spring months) and poor infrastructure.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Western Balkans have huge potential for sustainable tourism due to its rich cultural heritage and diversity, attractive coastlines and historic cities. Tourism is one of the largest and fastest-growing economic sectors in the region, and most countries are expected to grow significantly in terms of both contributing to GDP and creating jobs. Similar to agriculture, tourism depends on natural conditions, especially in coastal and mountainous regions. Climate change is projected to have a significant impact on the sensitive mountain environment, with implications for the attractiveness of the mountain environment for tourism and the occurrence of natural hazards (7). Mountain ski resorts are among the tourist sectors that are considered to be the most endangered because it is expected that the duration of the snow season will be significantly reduced in the future. The concentration of activity on a smaller area and a shorter period during the year could also put more pressure on sensitive mountain ecosystems. Coastal regions are also considered very sensitive to climatic conditions, and the Mediterranean region as a whole is expected to become less attractive due to drought and higher temperatures. On the other hand, higher temperatures in the coastal region may favor tourism in hilly and mountainous areas. There are other broad, potential indirect impacts of climate on tourism in the region (changes in freshwater quality, changes, and losses in biodiversity, changed agricultural production - wine tourism, landslides and forest fires, higher incidence of vector diseases). Mitigation policies aimed at reducing GHG emissions will increase transport costs and may have an impact on tourists\u0026apos; travel patterns. In the region the tourism industry will undoubtedly continue to be a growing sector regardless of the climate change challenges.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe energy sector is considered extremely important for the economic growth of the Western Balkan countries. There is great potential for the development of this sector primarily in new investments. High dependence on oil and natural gas (imported energy) raises concerns about the security of energy supply and the need to diversify new sources of renewables such as biomass, solar, and wind energy, as well as the introduction of energy efficiency. Current patterns of energy use in the Western Balkans lead to significant environmental impacts. The region as a whole has a high carbon intensity due to the high dependence and use of coal (lignite). Other environmental problems include pollution from energy combustion (e.g., indoor and local air pollution from inefficient and improperly used stoves) and deforestation and land degradation (from excessive use of wood for fuel). Taking into account all these characteristics, the energy sector in the region is the main source of GHG emissions, pollutants, and oil spills. The main domestic sources of electricity production in the region are lignite and hydropower. Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and North Macedonia are mainly dependent on lignite (coal) thermal power plants to generate electricity. Albania draws almost all its electricity from hydropower. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, and Montenegro also have significant hydropower capacity (7). The energy intensity (energy efficiency indicator) of the Western Balkans is high. This can be attributed to the degraded state of energy infrastructure, large energy losses during transformation, transmission, and distribution, and inefficiencies in the end-use sector. Energy systems in the region are considered to be very sensitive to extreme events and temperature changes (14). The extent and nature of the impact depend on the degree to which countries rely on different energy sources. Thermal energy production is sensitive to climate change due to the availability of water and temperature, due to the high dependence of these power plants on cooling water. Lower levels in lakes and rivers, reduced runoff, accelerated evaporation, and warmer water can also reduce the amount of cooling water or cause restrictions on cooling water intake or discharge, limiting production capacity (40). Taking into account the effects of climate change on river water temperature and river flows, the capacity of nuclear and fossil fuel power plants in Southern and Eastern Europe could face a decline of 6\u0026ndash;19% for the period 2031\u0026ndash;2060 compared to 1971\u0026ndash;2000 (40). More frequent extreme events, such as floods, will also jeopardize all types of energy infrastructure and lead to increased maintenance costs (34). In the Western Balkans much of the energy infrastructure requires extensive rehabilitation and replacement, given that it was built in the 1960s and 1970s (7). Climate change is expected to pose risks to electricity transmission network functions and reduce efficiency or change structural integrity, especially for older, poorly maintained facilities (34). Following the expected decline in annual river water levels and the changing seasonality of river flows, total hydropower production in Europe, including the Western Balkans, is expected to fall by 1.66 TWh, or 1.43%, compared to 2005 production levels (40). On the demand side, the trend of warmer winter temperatures and even warmer summers is expected to align the electricity consumption profile, as the demand for cooling energy increases and the thermal energy decreases (34). Electricity systems can be burdened to meet more stringent air conditioning requirements, especially if they rely on hydropower (40). Energy consumption in the Western Balkans has already increased by 53% between 1995 and 2005, and demand is expected to grow by an additional 34% from 2006 to 2030 (23). Economic development, population growth and climate impacts (reduced production and interruptions in electricity production) can together contribute to rising electricity prices and the risk of electricity shortages in the region (40, 41).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAdaptation to climate change\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdaptation is a risk management strategy that intends to respond to the inevitable effects of climate change and increase resilience - the ability to respond to a change in function or condition in the environment by resisting damage and recovering quickly. The countries of the Western Balkans face several challenges in terms of their adaptability. Countries with well-established, efficient governance and strong, stable economies have a distinct advantage in their adaptable capacities. Croatia has the largest adaptive capacity of the five countries covered by the index. North Macedonia has the lowest adaptive capacity, while Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia are in the middle (9). There is not enough data for Montenegro.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn Albania, hydropower sources produce more than 95% of the country\u0026apos;s electricity. In 2007, the total supply of the country was only 12% while in 2000 it was 25%. Overall, the share of total demand for renewable energy including hydropower fell from 42% in 2000 to 22% in 2007. The expected increase in long-term mean annual and seasonal air temperatures in Albania and a decrease in mean annual and seasonal rainfall will reduce long-term mean annual and seasonal water runoff. It is predicted that a 20% reduction in runoff will cause a 60% reduction in production. This means that while hydropower may be good for reducing GHG emissions, relying on hydropower can increase a country\u0026rsquo;s vulnerability to climate change. The precipitation regime is also important for agriculture, which is still the backbone of the Albanian economy.\u0026nbsp;In the transition from communist rule to multi-party democracy, Albania has undergone major political, institutional, and socio-economic changes, and governments have struggled with high unemployment, widespread corruption, poor infrastructure, and powerful organized crime networks, all in a disputed political environment. The transition from a centrally planned state to a more modern open-market economy has been difficult, but the government has adopted a package of fiscal reforms aimed at reducing the large gray economy and attracting foreign investment (9).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn Croatia, concerns about water resources are widening as to whether water supply can continue to meet growing drinking water needs. The main issues in agriculture relate to water availability and elevated temperature and focus on the prospects of reduced water supply and higher frequency of droughts. Although Croatia has largely achieved macroeconomic stabilization, deep public resistance and weak political support have inhibited structural reforms. The long-term outlook for growth remains strong, but difficult problems - high unemployment, growing trade deficits, and uneven regional development - remain. The global financial crisis will create significant pressure, and Croatia\u0026apos;s high external debt weakened the export sector, tight state budget, and excessive reliance on tourism revenues will result in a greater risk to economic stability in the medium term.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn North Macedonia industry and agriculture are the two most important sectors of the economy, but the services sector has recently gained in importance. Agriculture is a priority sector that accounts for a significant share of GDP and employment and contributes to social security and poverty reduction. North Macedonia expects very different effects from changes in temperature and precipitation: projections for reducing effective rains vary from 15 to 40%. Of the country\u0026apos;s available water resources, 84% is formed within its borders, so the country is particularly sensitive to the overall reduction of effective rainfall. Agriculture will bear the greatest burden of negative consequences, and the greatest effects are expected in the central and southeastern parts of the country. North Macedonia has limitations at the systemic, institutional, and individual levels. Lack of resources and staff is evident in the ministries of environment and spatial planning, economy, transport, health, and industry. The main economic problems of North Macedonia are low living standards, high unemployment, and relatively modest economic growth (9).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMontenegro\u0026apos;s vulnerability to climate change is greatest for forest ecosystems. Most Montenegrin forests are established by natural regeneration, and due to their climate and terrain, it is characterized by high biodiversity. They are important producers of biomass and are sources of fruits, herbs, and mushrooms. They provide habitat for wild plant and animal species, maintain and regulate the hydrological regime, protect against landslides and erosion, and absorb significant amounts of carbon. The extremely diverse ecosystems of Montenegro are characterized by rich flora and fauna - about 3,250 plant species, with the highest ratio of vascular flora and surface in Europe. Of the 526 European bird species, 297 can be found regularly in Montenegro, while about 29 other species are occasionally present. The country\u0026apos;s small national economy was hit by the 2009 recession, which was significantly caused by negative global economic trends. Unemployment and regional disparities in development remain key political and economic problems (9).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLike most of its neighbors in the Western Balkans, Serbia faces dangers associated with rising temperatures. Increasingly frequent and intense droughts during the last two decades have already caused great damage to Serbian agriculture, and it is expected that field production will fall by as much as 10% in the second half of this century. The Serbian agricultural sector is an important part of the national economy and thus increases the country\u0026apos;s vulnerability to climate change. Serbian agriculture employs 10% of the workforce and accounts for 26% of export earnings. With incomplete privatization and incomplete structural reforms, Serbia\u0026apos;s economy remains in transition. The country\u0026apos;s economic challenges include high government spending on wages, pensions, and unemployment, outdated technologies, degraded infrastructure, and low levels of domestic investment. Other problems include the growing need for new government borrowing combined with growing public and private external debt and stagnant levels of foreign investment. An inefficient justice system, high levels of corruption, and an aging population add to the difficulties. Serbia\u0026apos;s strategic position, relatively cheap and skilled labor, and a generous package of incentives for foreign investment are factors conducive to economic growth (9).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe main objective of this paper is to present the state of climate change in six Western Balkans countries, of which only Croatia is a member of the EU, for the needs of planning activities and initial harmonization with the EU plan to reaching net-zero GHG emissions by 2050. The paper provides an overview of climate change by country, scenario analysis, and policy recommendations. It can be concluded that all countries of the Western Balkans have adopted (or are in the process of adopting) the necessary regulations and strategies towards climate change mitigation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eClimate change mitigation strategies in Albania for the energy sector include switching to power plants using cleaner energy sources. Initiatives within agriculture focus on improving manure management and grazing systems and crop rotation. Also, the construction of new landfills with methane recovery and solid waste incinerators is intended to reduce waste-related emissions. Strategies related to land-use change and forestry include the development of sustainable forestry, the improvement of forest management practices, and the rehabilitation of degraded forest land. The development of Bosnia and Herzegovina's climate change mitigation strategy should include a national mitigation policy related to national economic and development plans; identifying measures and activities necessary for implementation; and provisions for direct government involvement at the entity level. Croatia has implemented several measures to mitigate climate change. The largest percentage of changes occurred in transport, land-use change, forestry, and waste. In the energy sector, the implemented measures included the promotion of the use of renewable energy sources in electricity production, the application of cogeneration and the improvement of energy efficiency in building construction, and also the construction of 1,000 MW nuclear power plants by 2024. In the transport sector, biofuel and a program for the promotion of railway transport are being introduced. New measures related to industrial processes are intended to reduce N\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO emissions in the production of nitric acid and emissions of volatile organic compounds in the use of solvents. New waste measures include avoiding and reducing municipal waste generation, increased recycling of municipal waste, and the use of landfill gas to generate electricity. In agriculture, efficient management of organic manure is promoted, and in the land use and forestry sector, efforts are being made to improve the management of private forests and new forest plantations. The plan to reduce emissions in North Macedonia envisages the use of natural gas for electricity production, maximizing the potential of hydropower and improving energy efficiency. Transport measures include improving the energy efficiency of vehicles and public urban and interurban transport. The waste strategy introduces sustainable management and measures for waste selection and recycling, composting, and reduction of landfilled waste. The main strategy in agriculture focuses on manure management and forestry on afforestation. Montenegro has identified emission reduction strategies for each sector. Strategies for the energy sector include combining heat and power generation, increasing the efficiency of industrial boilers and replacing coal with liquefied petroleum gas in industrial boiler rooms, and producing high-temperature heat. Plans for the transport sector envisage the replacement of fossil fuels with alternative fuels and the development of a more efficient transport system. Strategies for agriculture include improving manure management and encouraging organic agriculture. In the land use and forestry sector, Montenegro intends to increase the share of highly productive forests, rehabilitate damaged forests and preserve and improve forest habitats. Serbia's mitigation plans for the energy sector include improving energy efficiency and using more renewable energy sources. Automation, monitoring, and use of waste energy are the main strategies for reducing emissions in the field of industrial processes. In the transport sector, Serbia seeks to re-establish an efficient international railway system, repair roads, increase the level and efficiency of river transport and stop the production of leaded petrol. The use of biogas in the production of heat and electricity for local consumption is a key strategy for reducing agricultural emissions, and afforestation is a desirable strategy in the sector of land-use change and forestry. In the waste sector, Serbia plans to establish regional landfills and increase recycling rates.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe implementation of specific activities is at a low level. The reasons for this most often lies in the insufficient commitment of decision-makers to make significant changes in the field of climate change transition (lower level of economic development, lack of investment, preservation of social peace).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026rsquo; contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026quot;SK analyzed CO\u003csub\u003e2\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sub\u003eemission in Western Balkans, S\u0026Scaron; analyzed how climate change affects Western Balkans, and IP analyzed GHG emission in Western Balkans. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.\u0026quot;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors would like to thank the Public Scholarship, Development, Disability, and Maintenance Fund of the Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia (Grant No: 11081-4/2019), and Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Grant No: 451-03-9/2021-14/200026) for financial support.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAllen MR, Dube OP, Solecki W, Arag\u0026oacute;n-Durand F., Cramer W, Humphreys S, Kainuma M, Kala J, Mahowald N, Mulugetta Y, Perez R, Wairiu M, Zickfeld K (2018) Framing and Context. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, P\u0026ouml;rtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, P\u0026eacute;an C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds.) Global Warming of 1.5\u0026deg;C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5\u0026deg;C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Available via https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_Low_Res.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePBES (2019) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. In D\u0026iacute;az S, Settele J, Brond\u0026iacute;zio ES, Ngo HT, Gu\u0026egrave;ze M, Agard J, Arneth A, Balvanera P, Brauman KA, Butchart SHM, Chan KMA, Garibaldi LA, Ichii K, Liu J, Subramanian SM, Midgley GF, Miloslavich P, Moln\u0026aacute;r Z, Obura D, Pfaff A, Polasky S, Purvis A, Razzaque J, Reyers B, Roy Chowdhury R, Shin YJ, Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Willis KJ, Zayas CN (eds.). IPBES secretariat. Available via https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/inline/files/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRP (2019) Global Resources Outlook 2019: Natural resources for the future we want. Oberle, B, Bringezu S, Hatfield-Dodds S, Hellweg S, Schandl H, Clement J, Cabernard L, Che N, Chen D, Droz-Georget H, Ekins P, Fischer-Kowalski M, Fl\u0026ouml;rke M, Frank S, Froemelt A, Geschke A, Haupt M, Havlik P, H\u0026uuml;fner R, Lenzen M, Lieber M, Liu B, Lu Y, Lutter S, Mehr J, Miatto A, Newth D, Oberschelp C, Obersteiner M, Pfister S, Piccoli E, Schaldach R, Sch\u0026uuml;ngel J, Sonderegger T, Sudheshwar A, Tanikawa H, van der Voet E, Walker C, West J, Wang Z, Zhu B A Report of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme. Available via file:///C:/Users/PC/AppData/Local/Temp/GRO_2019.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2021. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEEA (2019) The European environment \u0026mdash; state and outlook 2020. Publications Office of the European Union. Available via https://d2ouvy59p0dg6k.cloudfront.net/downloads/soer_2020_executive_summary_embargoed_4_december.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe European Green Deal (2019) Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the european council, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Available via https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnited Nations Development Programme UNDP https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld. Accessed 26 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlfthan B, Krilasevic E, Venturini S, Bajrovic S, Jurek M, Schoolmeester T, Sandei PC, Egerer H, Kurvits T (2015) Outlook on climate change adaptation in the Western Balkan mountains. United Nations Environment Programme. GRIDArendal and Environmental Innovations Association. Available via https://gridarendal-website-live.s3.amazonaws.com/production/documents/:s_document/22/original/BalkanMountains_screen.pdf?1483646275. Accessed 27 June 2021. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVuković A, Vujadinović Mandić M (2018) Study on climate change in the Western Balkans region. Regional Cooperation Council Secretariat. Available via https://www.rcc.int/download/docs/2018-05-Study-on-Climate-Change-in-WB-2a-lowres.pdf/06af8f7432484a6ce384ebcb8c05e8d7.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBogdanovic J, Nikolayeva L, Novikov V, Siljic A, Simonett O, Egerer H, Sandei PC (2012) Climate change in the West Balkans. ENVSEC, Zo\u0026iuml; environment network. Available via http://archive.zoinet.org/web/sites/default/files/publications/Climate-change-west-balkans.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUNFCCC United Nations Climate Change (2015) Elements of Adaptation. Available via http://unfccc.int/adaptation/items/7006.php. Accessed 28 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKostopoulou E, Jones PD (2005) Assessment of climate extremes in the Eastern Mediterranean. Meteorol Atmos Phys 89:69\u0026ndash;85. doi:10.1007/s00703-005-0122-2.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLelieveld J, Hadjinicolaou P, Kostopoulou E, Chenoweth J, Maayar ME, Giannakopoulos C, Hannides C, Lange MA, Tanarhte M, Tyrlis E, Xoplaki E (2012) Climate change and impacts in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East. Clim Change 114:667\u0026ndash;687. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0418-4.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026Ouml;nol B, Semazzi FHM (2009) Regionalization of climate change simulations over the Eastern Mediterranean. J. Climate 22:1944\u0026ndash;1961. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI1807.1.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWorld Bank (2014) Turn down the Heat: Confronting the new climate normal. World Bank. Available via https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20595. Accessed 28 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKotlarski, S., Bosshard, T., L\u0026uuml;thi, D., Pall, P., Sch\u0026auml;r, C. (2011) Elevation gradients of European climate change in the regional climate model COSMO-CLM. Clim. Change, vol. 112, pp. 189\u0026ndash;215. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0195-5\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHoppe T, van den Berg MM, Coenen FH (2014) Reflections on the uptake of climate change policies by local governments: facing the challenges of mitigation and adaptation. Energ Sustain Soc 4:8 doi:10.1186/2192-0567-4-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Wehner M (2013) Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble. Clim Change 119:345\u0026ndash;357. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0705-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWorld Bank (2003) Water Resources Management in South Eastern Europe, Volume I. Issues and Directions. World Bank. Available via https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15280. Accessed 28 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2011) Second Assessment of Transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwaters: executive summary. Zo\u0026iuml; Environment Network. Available via https://unece.org/DAM/env/water/publications/assessment/English/Executive_Summary_EN_web.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEEA European Environment Agency (2010) Environmental trends and perspectives in the Western Balkans: future production and consumption patterns. Available via https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/western-balkans. Accessed 29 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eArnell NW, Gosling SN (2013) The impacts of climate change on river flow regimes at the global scale. J Hydrol 486:351\u0026ndash;64. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.010.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchneider C, Laize CLR, Acreman M, Florke M (2013) How will climate change modify river flow regimes in Europe? Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 17:325\u0026ndash;39. doi:10.5194/hess-17-325-2013. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEEA European Environment Agency (2008) National emissions reported to the UNFCCC and to the EU greenhouse gas monitoring mechanism. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/national-emissions-reported-to-the-unfccc-and-to-the-eu-greenhouse-gas-monitoring-mechanism-14. Accessed 29 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVolk T, Erjavec E, Mortensen K (2014) Agricultural policy and european integration in South-Eastern Europe. FAO. Available via http://www.fao.org/3/i4166e/i4166e.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWorld Bank (2012) Employment in agriculture (per cent of total employment), World Bank Available via https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.AGR.EMPL.ZS. Accessed 29 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGocic M, Trajkovic S (2014) Spatiotemporal characteristics of drought in Serbia. J Hydrol 510:110\u0026ndash;23. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.030.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOlesen JE, Bindi M (2002) Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur J Agron 6:239\u0026ndash;262. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00004-7\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGiannakopoulos C, Le Sager P, Bindi M, Moriondo M, Kostopoulou E, Goodess CM (2009) Climatic changes and associated impacts in the mediterranean resulting from a 2\u0026deg;C global warming. Global Planet Change 68:209\u0026ndash;24. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.06.001.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSutton WR, Srivastava JP, Neumann JE (2013) Looking beyond the horizon: how climate change impacts and adaptation responses will reshape agriculture in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. World Bank. Available via https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/676601468249642651/pdf/Looking-beyond-the-horizon-how-climate-change-impacts-and-adaptation-responses-will-reshape-agriculture-in-Eastern-Europe-and-Central-Asia.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMarkus-Johansson M, Mesquita B, Nemeth A., Dimovski M, Monnier C, Kiss-Parciu P (2010) Illegal logging in South Eastern Europe: Regional Report. REC Regional Environment Centre for Central and Eastern Europe. Available via http://documents.rec.org/publications/Illegal_Logging_in_South_Eastern_Europe_Regional_Report_EN_OCT_2010.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eParviainen J (2005) Virgin and natural forests in the temperate zone of Europe. For Snow Landsc Res 79:9\u0026ndash;18.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eM\u0026aacute;ty\u0026aacute;s C (2010) Forecasts needed for retreating forests. Nature 464:1271. doi: 10.1038/4641271a.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds.). Cambridge University Press. Available via https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ar4_wg2_full_report.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKnez S (2021) A model of managerial competences in aviation micro-enterprises. Dissertation, University of Maribor.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWorld Bank (2009) Adapting to Climate Change in Europe and Central Asia. World Bank. Available via https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/127181468024643244/pdf/489480ESW0ECA010Box338935B01PUBLIC1.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVan Vliet MTH, Yearsley JR, Ludwig F, V\u0026ouml;gele S, Lettenmaier DP, Kabat P (2012) Vulnerability of U.S. and European electricity supply to climate change. Nat Clim Change 2:676\u0026ndash;81. doi:10.1038/nclimate1546\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHamududu B, Killingtveit A (2012) Assessing climate change impacts on global hydropower. Energies 5:305\u0026ndash;22. doi:10.3390/en5020305.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMcDermott GR, Nilsen \u0026Oslash;A (2014) Electricity prices, river temperatures, and cooling water scarcity. Land Econ 90:31\u0026ndash;48. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1941820.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEC European Commission (2013) An EU Strategy on adaptation to climate change. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. Available via http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2013:0216:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 1 July 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBen Othman A, Ouni A, Besbes M (2020) Deep learning-based estimation of PV power plant potential under climate change: a case study of El Akarit, Tunisia. Energ Sustain Soc 10:34. doi:10.1186/s13705-020-00266-1.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"energy-sustainability-and-society","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"esso","sideBox":"Learn more about [Energy, Sustainability and Society](https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"13705","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/13705/3","title":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","twitterHandle":"@OpenEnviron","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Climate Change, Western Balkans, European Union, European Green Deal","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-829240/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-829240/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground:\u003c/strong\u003e The European Commission (EC), based on the European Green Deal (2019) and \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ethe Recovery plan for Europe (2021) envisages investing 30% of the budget in climate-related programs, projects, and initiatives, which clearly shows Europe's commitment to becoming the first climate-neutral region by 2050. Activities are also planned for countries that are not members of the European Union (EU), which requires complex changes in the field of legislation, strategic planning, implementation, and monitoring. To successfully plan short-term and long-term activities on these grounds, it is necessary to have a realistic picture of the state of climate change in each country - as they spill over into the entire region of Europe. The main objective of this paper is to present the state of climate change in six Western Balkans countries, of which only Croatia is a member of the EU, for the needs of planning activities and initial harmonization with the EU plan to reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by 2050. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults:\u003c/strong\u003e The main results of the research show that in all countries of the region, the average annual temperature increased by 1.2 °C compared to 1970, with stabilization and the beginning of the decline which can be expected around 2040. The main reasons for climate change in the region are: industry, energy, and heating sector based on coal exploitation, low energy efficiency, etc. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusions:\u003c/strong\u003e It can be concluded that all countries of the Western Balkans have adopted (or are in the process of adopting) the necessary regulations and strategies towards climate change mitigation, but the implementation of specific activities is at a low level. The reasons for this most often lies in the insufficient commitment of decision-makers to make significant changes in the field of climate change transition (lower level of economic development, lack of investment, preservation of social peace). Finally, the paper provides an overview of climate change by country, scenario analysis, and policy recommendations.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Climate Change in the Western Balkans and Eu Green Deal – Coherence, Challenges, and Perspective","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-08-26 20:33:53","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-829240/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revise before review","date":"2021-08-31T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2021-08-25T01:57:29+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2021-08-24T12:02:19+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2021-08-23T23:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","date":"2021-08-19T11:05:37+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"energy-sustainability-and-society","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"esso","sideBox":"Learn more about [Energy, Sustainability and Society](https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"13705","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/13705/3","title":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","twitterHandle":"@OpenEnviron","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4749552b-1a4c-4a00-bdff-a048e49dba72","owner":[],"postedDate":"August 26th, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":6719087,"name":"Energy Engineering"},{"id":6719088,"name":"Renewable Resources"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-12-06T22:14:44+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2021-08-26 20:33:53","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-829240","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-829240","identity":"rs-829240","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"WrCJVZZCHTDjtuVLN7oU0","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}